Comparative Analysis of Two Lumber Production Systems| Thrasher Thin Blade Versus a Conventional Mill Operation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Comparative Analysis of Two Lumber Production Systems| Thrasher Thin Blade Versus a Conventional Mill Operation University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1973 Comparative analysis of two lumber production systems| Thrasher thin blade versus a conventional mill operation John Michael Shepherd The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Shepherd, John Michael, "Comparative analysis of two lumber production systems| Thrasher thin blade versus a conventional mill operation" (1973). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 1840. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/1840 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OP TWO LUMBER PRODUCTION SYSTEMS: THRASHER THIN BLADE VERSUS A CONVENTIONAL MILL OPERATION By John M. Shepherd B.S., University of Montana, 1972 Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science In Business Administration UNIVERSITY OP MONTANA 1973 Approved by: UMI Number: EP34208 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent on the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMT umnfaraQn nHwsning UMI EP34208 Copyright 2012 by ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This edition of the work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 h TABLE OP CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE LIST OP TABLES iii LIST OP EXHIBITS v I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. DESCRIPTION OP THE THRASHER SYSTEM: AN EPPORT TO REDUCE WASTE 11 III. DESCRIPTION OP THE CONVENTIONAL MILL 20 IV. THE EVALUATION OP KERP REDUCTION: THE SAWMILL SIMULATION MODEL 2^1 1 V. RESULTS OP REDUCING KERP AS CALCULATED BY THE SIMULATION MODEL 36 VI. SUMMARY: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. 5^ BIBLIOGRAPHY 60 APPENDIX 63 ii LIST OP TABLES TABLE PAGE I. Current Wholesale Prices per Thousand Board Feet Douglas Fir - Random Lengths 28 II. Simplified Flowchart of Sawmill Simulation Model 29 III. Conversion of Current Lumber Prices per 1,000 Board Feet (MBF) to Lumber Prices per 1,000 Lineal Feet (MLF) 33 IV. Results of Sawmill Simulation Model Using the Conventional Mill Operation 38 V. Summation of Values for the Four Sides Plus the Cant Conventional Mill ^0 VI. Results of Sawmill Simulation Model using the Thrasher Production System VII. Thrasher Mill Systems ^^3 VIII. Comparison of Value Obtained from Selected Log Diameters by Thrasher System and Conventional Mill System ^5 IX. Comparison of Scaled Log Volume to Conventional Mill Tally for l6-Poot Logs Scribner Decimal C ^9 X. Volumetric Comparison of Lumber Recovery by Thrasher System and the Conventional Mill using the Simulation Model 50 XI. Differences in Volume of Material That Must be Planed from Rough Green Lumber When Comparing the Thrasher System to the Conventional Mill 53 ill TABLE PAGE XII. Effect on Cash Plows of Converting to the Thrasher System Over the Ten-year Life of the Asset 56 XIII. Calculations of Internal Rate of Return and Pay Back Period 58 XIV. Common Fractions and Their Decimal Equivalents XV. Conventional Mill: Monthly Production Figures by Years Beginning January 1968 to January 1972 Sawmill Only (In MBF) ... XVI. Conventional Mill Production Costs for Years 1968-I969 (Sawmilling Only) XVII. Inland Mills, Western Wood Products - Association December 7, 1972 XVIII. Cubic Content of Commonly Manufactured Lumber Sizes Dressed to 1972 W.W.P.A. Standard Lumber Sizes 1 XIX. Conventional Mill Total Volume of Wood Needed to Produce the Nominal Sizes Under the Present Manufacturing System per Lineal Foot ' ^ XX. Thrasher System Total Volume of Wood Needed to Produce the Nominal Sizes of Lumber using the Thrasher System of . Manufacturing XXI. Additional Volume of Wood Used by Conventional Mill as Compared to Thrasher System of Manufacturing '5 XXII. 1966 Output of Roundwood Products from Montana Timberlands by Land Ownership, Class and Product, 1966 XXIII. 1971 Agricultural Statistics United States Department of Agriculture, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C '' iv. LIST OP EXHIBITS EXHIBIT PAGE 1. Thrasher Method 2. Thrasher Method 3. Breakdovm of a l4-lnch Log Thrasher Mill. 31 Best Breakdown of a 14" Log Using the Thrasher System 35 5. Conventional Mill Wood Required to Manufacture Common Nominal Sizes of Lumber 61 Thrasher System Wood Required to Manufacture Common Nominal Sizes of Lumber V. CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION In Western Montana, the forest products industry supports 43 per cent of the population, either directly or indirectly, and generates 51 per cent of the personal income (Johnson, 1972). Just as Western Montana is dependent on the timber * industry, the timber industry is dependent on the avail­ ability of timber. The volume of timber that can be cut in any year is dependent on the number of acres available forJ harvesting (at a fixed level of management) and any reduction in acreage will have a corresponding effect on timber production and thus on the economy of Western Montana. The individual mill owner faces stumpage prices that are rising faster than the market value of lumber. The mill owner must become more efficient, and the Thrasher system of thin- blade precision sawing may offer an opportunity to increase efficiency and profitability of the sawmill (Thrasher 1972). Until recently, the woods products industry and the 1 2 Forest Service were primarily concerned with the harvesting of timber in the most economical way for the short run. The logging pressure on the national forests has increased sub­ stantially during the past 25 years. Between 1952 and 1969, total timber harvested in the Western states showed an increase of 35 per cent. During the same period, timber cutting on Western National forests increased from 3,855 million board feet to 9,798 million board feet, or 15^ per cent (Wikstrom and Hutchison, 1971). Sixty per cent of the wood harvested in Montana comes from the national forests (Johnson, 1972). During the past decade, changes in attitudes by the American public have resulted in legislation and directives that may have serious repercussions for many in the forest products industry. The Multiple Use Act recognizes that our national forests have important uses other than timber. (i960). The American public has increased its demands for more recreation land, more wilderness areas, better harvesting methods, and a reduction or total elimination of clearcutting on the national forests. The end result is an estimated reduction in the allowable cut by the Forest Service of 22 per cent. (M. Johnson, 1972). In 1963, the allowable cut for the lands comprising the Ninth District Federal Reserve system was approximately 3 455 million cubic feet with an estimated growth rate of 320 million cubic feet and a reservoir of 17 billion cubic feet of standing timber (Nelson,. 1963). The allowable cuts exceeded the current growth rate by 135 million cubic feet. The figures quoted by Nelson are not actual but esti­ mated volumes. With estimates such as the current annual growth of 320 million cubic feet, it must be remembered that changes in the intensity of management can alter the figures drastically. If the apparent level of overharvesting continues, the timber reservoir will be completely depleted in 126 years. When Edgar T. Ensign conducted the first survey of Western Montana Forests in 1887 for the United States Department of Agriculture, he was appalled at the amount of timber being harvested in the Missoula area and felt certain the supply would be exhausted in 15 years (1888). An interesting figure developed by Nelson is the estimated 155 million cubic feet of logging and mill residue. One-hundrec fifty-five million cubic feet of solid wood could be processed into approximately 900 million board feet of lumber by a conventional mill operation (155 MMCP x 12 BF/Cublc Foot). ( 2(avg. recovery)) of the 1963 allowable cut would remove 100 million cubic feet of standing lumber and 600 million board feet of lumber The projected 22 per cent reduction in timber to be harvested is expected to drive the stumpage value of timber higher. The mill owners can be expected to try to continue to operate their miles at the present or higher levels of production. With a smaller supply of logs, the increased competition for the available logs will drive the stumpage prices higher (Johnson, 1972). The higher stumpage prices will make the selling and harvesting of timber more attrac­ tive to small woodlot owners (Bolle, i960). However, the total board foot volume available from private woodlots cannot compensate for the volume of timber to be removed from the market by the Forest Service (Setzer and Wilson, 1970). In the Rocky Mountain States, national forests accounted for 500 million of the 800 million cubic foot volume of round wood products in 1966 (includes posts, poles, veneer, lumber, etc.). In Montana, national forests accounted for 59.^ per cent of the round wood usage in 1966. Non- industrial private resources contributed less than 10 per cent for the Rocky Mountain region and 15 per cent for Montana (Setzer and Wilson, 1970). The price paid for stumpage by the mills has increased drastically over the past decade. In 196I, the national average was $27.60 for Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesil) and $12.10 for ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) per thousand board feet (MBP).
Recommended publications
  • Calculating Board Feet Board Feet Linear Feet Z "Board Feet" Is a Measurement of Lumber Square Feet Volume
    Calculating Board Feet board Feet linear feet z "Board Feet" is a measurement of lumber square feet volume. z A board foot is equal to 144 cubic inches of wood. TED 126 Spring 2007 z Actually it's easy to calculate using the following formula: Bd. Ft. = T (inches) x W (inches) x L (feet) / 12 2 Board Feet Board Feet z When you are figuring up board feet, keep in mind a waste factor. Bd. Ft. = T (inches) x W (inches) x L (feet) / 12 z If you purchase good clear material add about 15% for waste, Bd. Ft. = T (inches) x W (inches) x L (inches) / 144 z if you elect to use lower grade material you will have to allow for defects and more wasted material ---add about 30%. 3 4 Board Feet and Linear feet Board Feet and Linear feet z A linear foot is a measure of length 12 inches z To convert linear feet to board feet: long and a Thickness” x Width” x Length’ ÷ 12 z board foot is a number calculated by determining the volume of a board that is 12 z To convert board feet to linear feet: inches wide and 1 inch thick. • In other words, a 1" x 6" board that measures 24" 12 ÷ Thickness” x Width” x Board Foot long is exactly one board foot. (width" x thickness" x length' / 12) 5 6 1 Linear feet and Square Feet The math…. z It is not possible to convert linear footage into z A Linear Feet is just a measurement of square footage because a linear foot is only one length and does not take into account its dimension and a square foot is two dimensions, width or thickness.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Analysis of a Small Log Sawmill in Southeast Alaska
    1 Feasibility analysis of a small log sawmill in Southeast Alaska Executive Summary Unlike most Southern Yellow Pine sawmills, a small log mill in Southeast Alaska that manufactured lumber from 60-year old trees, would not be profitable. There are many additional operating costs in the remote forests of Southeast Alaska that the Southern Yellow Pine sawmills do not incur. The two most costly disadvantages are; 1. An additional $SO per thousand board feet of lumber that is required to transport lumber from Southeast Alaska to the Pacific Northwest and, 2. The lack ofany reasonable economy of scale. The small timber sale volume projected to be available to the manufacturing industry in Southeast Alaska is inadequate to support more than a single mid-size sawmill. Consequently the regions sawmills will not produce any income from the residual products - chips, sawdust and bark. The chips are currently barged to pulp mills in the Pacific Northwest and Canada, while the Yellow Pine sawmills can deliver chips to nearby pulp mills at a much lower cost than the Alaska sawmills. Similarly, there are no fiberboard plants to utilize the sawdust from Southeast Alaska sawmills and there is no market for the bark in Southeast Alaska. Instead, most ofthe sawdust and bark must be disposed of in landfills. Introduction The purpose of this analysis is to compare several financial estimates of the feasibility of manufacturing lumber from immature young growth timber in Southeast Alaska. Four sawmill proformas are 1 examined : 1. A summary of five actual Southern Yellow Pine sawmills. This proforma was used because much of the rhetoric surrounding the Secretary of Agriculture unilateral decision to transition to 60+ year old Alaska young growth was based on assertions that Yellow Pine sawmills harvest their 2 timber before age 60 • Other than the obvious difference in tree species, the yellow pine region has much different logistic issues than Southeast Alaska.
    [Show full text]
  • Useful Forestry Measurements Acre: a Unit of Area Equaling 43,560
    Useful Forestry Measurements Acre: A unit of area equaling 43,560 square feet or 10 square chains. Basal Area: The area, usually in square feet, of the cross-section of a tree stem near its base, generally at breast height and inclusive of bark. The basal area per acre measurement gives you some idea of crowding of trees in a stand. Board Foot: A unit of area for measuring lumber equaling 12 inches by 12 inches by 1 inch. Chain: A unit of length. A surveyor’s chain equals 66 feet or 1/80-mile. Cord: A pile of stacked wood measuring 4 feet by 4 feet by 8 feet when originally conceived. Cubic Foot: A unit of volume measure, wood equivalent to a solid cube that measures 12 inches by 12 inches by 12 inches or 1,728 cubic inches. Cunit: A volume of wood measuring 3 feet and 1-1/2 inches by 4 feet by 8 feet and containing 100 solid cubic feet of wood. D.B.H. (diameter breast height): The measurement of a tree’s diameter at 4-1/2 feet above the ground line. M.B.F. (thousand board feet): A unit of measure containing 1,000 board feet. Section: A unit of area containing 640 acres or one square mile. Square Foot: A unit of area equaling 144 square inches. Township: A unit of land area covering 23,040 acres or 36 sections. Equations Cords per acre (based on 10 Basal Area Factor (BAF) angle gauge) (# of 8 ft sticks + # of trees)/(2 x # plots) Based on 10 Basal Area Factor Angle Gauge Example: (217+30)/(2 x 5) = 24.7 cords/acre BF per acre ((# of 8 ft logs + # of trees)/(2 x # plots)) x 500 Bd ft Example: (((150x2)+30)/(2x5))x500 = 9000 BF/acre or
    [Show full text]
  • Estimating the Board Foot to Cubic Foot Ratio
    United States Department of Agriculture Estimating the Forest Service Forest Board Foot to Products Laboratory Cubic Foot Ratio Research Paper FPL-RP-616 Steve Verrill Victoria L. Herian Henry Spelter Abstract Contents Certain issues in recent softwood lumber trade negotiations Page have centered on the method for converting estimates of 1 Introduction .................................................................... 1 timber volumes reported in cubic meters to board feet. Such conversions depend on many factors; three of the most im- 2 The F3 × F2 × F1 Model.................................................. 2 portant of these are log length, diameter, and taper. Average log diameters vary by region and have declined in the west- 3 The F1 Factor.................................................................. 2 ern United States due to the growing scarcity of large diame- ter, old-growth trees. Such a systematic reduction in size in 4 F3 × F2............................................................................. 3 the log population affects volume conversions from cubic units to board feet, which makes traditional rule of thumb 5 Applying the F3 × F2 × F1 Model to a Population conversion factors antiquated. In this paper we present an of West Coast Logs ........................................................ 3 improved empirical method for performing cubic volume to board foot conversions. 6 Smoothing the F3 × F2 Surface....................................... 4 Keywords: Scribner scaling, diameter, length, taper, 7 Optimal Smoothing
    [Show full text]
  • California Assessment of Wood Business Innovation Opportunities and Markets (CAWBIOM)
    California Assessment of Wood Business Innovation Opportunities and Markets (CAWBIOM) Phase I Report: Initial Screening of Potential Business Opportunities Completed for: The National Forest Foundation June 2015 CALIFORNIA ASSESSMENT OF WOOD BUSINESS INNOVATION OPPORTUNITIES AND MARKETS (CAWBIOM) PHASE 1 REPORT: INITIAL SCREENING OF POTENTIAL BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES PHASE 1 REPORT JUNE 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE CHAPTER 1 – EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................. 1 1.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Interim Report – brief Summary ...................................................................................................... 1 1.2.1 California’s Forest Products Industry ............................................................................................... 1 1.2.2 Top Technologies .............................................................................................................................. 2 1.2.3 Next Steps ........................................................................................................................................ 3 1.3 Interim Report – Expanded Summary .............................................................................................. 3 1.3.1 California Forest Industry Infrastructure .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Determining Lumber Recovery in Sawmilling
    United States Department of Agriculture Factors Determining Forest Service Forest Products Lumber Recovery in Laboratory General Technical SawmiI ling Report FPL-39 Philip H. Steele Abstract Lumber volume recovery in sawmilling is determined by a confusing interaction of several factors. The more one knows about each individual factor, the more one can understand how the factors interact. The author identifies and discusses in detail seven factors influencing lumber recovery. Past and current research is cited, and examples are given to illustrate the points made. Keywords: Lumber recovery, sawmills, sawmilling. April 1984 Steele, Philip H. Factors determining lumber recovery in sawmilling. Gen. Tech. Rep. FPL-39. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Servrice, Forest Products Laboratory, 1984. 8 p. A limited number of free copies of this publication are available to the public from the Forest Products Laboratory, P.O. Box 5130, Madison, WI 63706. Laboratory publications are sent to over 1,000 libraries in the United States and elsewhere. The Laboratory is maintained in cooperation with the University of Wisconsin. Factors Determining Lumber Recovery in Sawmilling Philip H. Steele, Forest Products Technologist Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, Wis. Introduction The Factors Identified Lumber recovery in sawmilling is determined by a The following factors influence lumber recovery during the confusing interaction of several variables. Since no two sawmilling process and are examined in detail in this sawmills are alike, the variables that influence lumber report: recovery are seldom the same from one sawmill to (1) Log diameter, length, taper, and quality. another. This complexity confuses even those with a wide (2) Kerf width.
    [Show full text]
  • Old School Water and Wastewater Operator Training
    Inte rnational Correspondence Schools Scranton, Pa. Weights and Measures PREPARED ESPECIALLY FOR HOME ST UDY By I.C.S. STAFF 53766 1978 EDITION 1 WEIGHTS AND MEASURES Serial 1978 Edition I DENOMINATE NUlUBERS REVIEW NOTICE This t~xt includes tables a~d ezplanations of the various English ENGLISH MEASURES a.nd metnc ~easures. T~e subJects of reduction descending and reduc­ bon ascending are ezpla1ned and also the conversion from one system to anoth.er. There; a.re ~U ezplanations of the rules for the addition, su~trachon, multipl!cahon and . div~aion of compound numbers, and DEFJXITJOXS dnll problems shoWlng the apphcahon of these processes in practical problems. 1. Varieties of Measures.-A :m.easure is a standard From time t~ time s.light changes have been made in the text since it unit, established by law or custom, by means of which a quan­ was first pubhshed, 1~ order to ~i mplify those passages that were tity of any kind may be measured. For example, the inch and found to cause some d1~culty. Th1s text was reviewed in 1941 by J. W. Law.rence, A. M., Duector of the School of Mathematics of the the mile are measures of leugth; the pint and the gallon are Internabonal Correspondence Schools and found to be fundamentall aouna. ' Y measures of capacil)•, as used for liquids; the ounce and the ton are measnres of weight; the second and the month are measures Copyright, 1921, by I NTERNATIONAL T EXTBOOK COKPASY. Copyright in Great of time, and so on. Britain. All rights resen-ed 1978 Printed in U.
    [Show full text]
  • The International System of Units (SI) - Conversion Factors For
    NIST Special Publication 1038 The International System of Units (SI) – Conversion Factors for General Use Kenneth Butcher Linda Crown Elizabeth J. Gentry Weights and Measures Division Technology Services NIST Special Publication 1038 The International System of Units (SI) - Conversion Factors for General Use Editors: Kenneth S. Butcher Linda D. Crown Elizabeth J. Gentry Weights and Measures Division Carol Hockert, Chief Weights and Measures Division Technology Services National Institute of Standards and Technology May 2006 U.S. Department of Commerce Carlo M. Gutierrez, Secretary Technology Administration Robert Cresanti, Under Secretary of Commerce for Technology National Institute of Standards and Technology William Jeffrey, Director Certain commercial entities, equipment, or materials may be identified in this document in order to describe an experimental procedure or concept adequately. Such identification is not intended to imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor is it intended to imply that the entities, materials, or equipment are necessarily the best available for the purpose. National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publications 1038 Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. Spec. Pub. 1038, 24 pages (May 2006) Available through NIST Weights and Measures Division STOP 2600 Gaithersburg, MD 20899-2600 Phone: (301) 975-4004 — Fax: (301) 926-0647 Internet: www.nist.gov/owm or www.nist.gov/metric TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD.................................................................................................................................................................v
    [Show full text]
  • Making the Grade a Guide to Appearance Grading UK Grown Hardwood Timber
    Making the Grade A guide to appearance grading UK grown hardwood timber Contents Authors Ivor Davies 1 and Guy Watt 2 Introduction 3 Photography Unless otherwise stated, all photographs are by G R Brearley, Forest Research The appearance grading system used in this guide 5 Acknowledgements This guide has been commissioned by the Forestry Commission, the Welsh Development Detailed grading criteria Agency, the Northern Ireland Forest Service, 8 Scottish Enterprise and the Scottish Forestry Trust. Ash The authors gratefully acknowledge the 10 support of the project steering group and a large number of busy people throughout the hardwood supply-chain. Most of the Beech 12 timber samples were generously supplied by Woodschool Ltd, English Woodlands Timber Ltd and Scottish Wood Ltd. Oak 14 Disclaimer Appearance grading can only be a first approximation and it is always up to the customer to ensure that the characteristics of Sycamore 18 the timber selected will suit their envisaged use. In case of dispute, reference should be made to the relevant standards listed in the bibliography. While every effort has been made Sweet chestnut 20 to ensure the accuracy of this publication, the authors, sponsors, and publishers cannot accept liability for any loss or damage arising Cherry from the information supplied. 22 Publication details This publication should be cited as: Lime Davies I. and Watt G., 2005, 23 Making the Grade – A guide to appearance grading UK grown hardwood timber. Published by Elm 24 arcamedia 8 Campbell’s Close, Edinburgh EH8 8JJ Appendix 1 Telephone: 0131 556 7963 A comparison between this system and Email: [email protected] 26 the European and British standards Printed by Keyline ISBN 1-904320-03-1 Appendix 2 Text © Crown Copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Timber Products Harvested from Your Woodland Paul Oester and Steve Bowers
    Archival copy. For current version, see: https://catalog.extension.oregonstate.edu/ec1127 FOREST MEASUREMENT EC 1127 • Revised December 2009 Measuring Timber Products Harvested from Your Woodland Paul Oester and Steve Bowers Contents Fundamentals of measurement ..............1 anaging woodland property offers you the opportunity Measurement units ...............................2 Board foot ............................................. 2 to harvest a variety of products, depending on timber Cubic foot .............................................. 2 quality and quantity, harvest economics, and market Cord ..................................................... 2 M availability. Among these products are saw logs (for lumber Linear measurements .............................. 2 or plywood), peeler logs (for plywood), pulpwood, fuelwood, Weight .................................................. 3 poles, piling, and posts. Measuring logs ....................................3 Board-foot log rules ................................ 3 Knowledge of measurements used in the wood products Log scaling ............................................ 4 industry can help you make management and marketing deci- Board-foot volume .................................. 4 sions that ultimately will increase financial returns from your Selling logs by weight ............................. 4 woodlot. Cubic-foot volume ................................... 5 Defects .................................................. 7 This publication describes measurements used to buy and
    [Show full text]
  • Date Thesis Is Presented Analysis Has Further Usefulness in Projecting The
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Douglas Sterling Smith for the Master of Science in Forest Management. Date thesis is presented November ZZ, 1966 Title A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF LOG VOLUME CONCEPTS AND PRODUCT DERIVATIVES Abstract approved Signature redacted for privacy. One of the most important challenges facing foresters is the development of a raw material measurement system designed to give a complete inventory of log volume and to assist in planning the com- plete management of log production.This paper introduces a concept of production analysis in terms of solid fiber content.The basis for the development of this concept is the measurement of logs and log production in terms of cubic feet.Total raw material accountability is maintained throughout the manufacturing process. A mill study was undertaken to compare the results of this type of analysis with results obtained by traditional analytical methods. It was found that raw material management by this analysis can be useful in measuring the effectiveness of a production design.This analysis has further usefulness in projecting the results of proposed changes in production design.The mill study was undertaken with 2 the log input, primary lumber products, and sawmill residuals measured in terms of cubic feet of wood fiber.This study is referred to as treatment A in this paper.The mill study data were used to project two changes in sawing practices, treatments B and C, and the expected results are presented.The 471 logs in the study had a volume of 172, 850 board feet gross, and 143, 490 board feet net, Scribner scale.The logs had a volume of 24, 574 cubic feet on the basis of Smalian? s cubic foot rule.The volumes in the study were assigned dollar values on the basis of grade and projected on the basis of an annual cut of 30 million board feet, assuming the same variables encountered in the test material.
    [Show full text]
  • A Collection of Log Rules U.S.D.A
    A COLLECTION OF LOG RULES U.S.D.A. FOREST SERVICE GENERAL TECHNICAL REPORT FPL U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST SERVICE FOREST PRODUCTS LABORATORY MADISON, WIS. CONTENTS Introduction 1 Symbology 3 A graphic comparison of log rules 4 Section I. Log Rules of United States and 9 Canada Section II. Some Volume Formulae, Lumber 41 Measures, and Foreign Log Rules Tables showing the board foot volume of 16- 50 foot logs according to various log rules Bibliography 56 A COLLECTION OF LOG RULES By FRANK FREESE, Statistician Forest Products Laboratory Forest Service U.S. Department of Agriculture INTRODUCTION A log rule may be defined as a table or formula names. In addition, there are numerous local showing the estimated net yield for logs of a given variations in the application of any given rule. diameter and length. Ordinarily the yield is ex- Basically, there are three methods of develop- pressed in terms of board feet of finished lumber, ing a new log rule. The most obvious is to record though a few rules give the cubic volume of the the volume of lumber produced from straight, log or some fraction of it. Built into each log rule defect-free logs of given diameters and lengths are allowances for losses due to such things as and accumulate such data until all sizes of logs slabs, saw kerf, edgings, and shrinkage. have been covered. These “mill scale” or “mill At first glance, it would seem to be a relative- tally” rules have the virtue of requiring no as- ly simple matter to devise such a rule and having sumptions and of being perfectly adapted to all the done so that should be the end of the problem.
    [Show full text]