University of Florida Thesis Or Dissertation Formatting Template

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

University of Florida Thesis Or Dissertation Formatting Template GENETIC VARIATION IN CALADIUM AND PETUNIA By ZHE CAO A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2016 © 2016 ZHE CAO To my family and friends ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my Ph.D. committees, Drs. Zhanao Deng, David G. Clark, Kenneth Quesenberry, Natalia Peres, and Ryan Warner for their guidance on my research projects. We are grateful to Dr. Jaroslav Doležel (Institute Experimental Botany, Olomouc, Czech Republic) for providing rye seeds and to the University of Florida’s Interdisciplinary Center for Biotechnology Research for access to its flow cytometer. Completion of my Ph.D. projects required five years. I also must thank my parents for supporting me and understanding my absence from their lives for such a long time. My wife always provides me with supports and advices both in daily life and my research projects and without which I would not finish my projects. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .................................................................................................. 4 LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................ 9 LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................ 11 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................... 13 ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................... 15 CHAPTER 1 LITERATURE REVIEW .......................................................................................... 17 Overview ................................................................................................................. 17 Floriculture in Florida ........................................................................................ 17 Caladium .......................................................................................................... 18 Petunia ............................................................................................................. 20 Challenges in Caladium and Petunia Breeding ................................................ 21 Exploration of Genetic Variation ............................................................................. 23 Use of Wild Relatives, Progenitor Species, and Primitive Cultivars .................. 23 Inducing Genetic Variation (Somaclonal Variation) .......................................... 24 Genetic Variation in Caladium ................................................................................ 26 Caladium Wild Species..................................................................................... 26 Somaclonal Variation ....................................................................................... 27 Variation in Major Leaf Characteristics ............................................................. 28 Genetic Variation in Petunia ................................................................................... 29 Important Wild Species in Petunia .................................................................... 29 Challenges in Using Wild Germplasm in Breeding Programs ........................... 30 Linkage Map Development and QTL Analysis in Petunia Wild Germplasm ..... 30 Research Objectives ............................................................................................... 31 Caladium .......................................................................................................... 31 Petunia ............................................................................................................. 32 2 INTERSPECIFIC GENOME SIZE AND CHROMOSOME NUMBER VARIATION IN CALADIUM (ARACEAE) .................................................................................... 33 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 33 Materials and Methods............................................................................................ 34 Plant Materials .................................................................................................. 34 Genome Size Determination ............................................................................ 35 Chromosome Counting .................................................................................... 36 Results .................................................................................................................... 37 Genome Size Estimates ................................................................................... 37 5 Chromosome Counts ....................................................................................... 39 Discussion .............................................................................................................. 41 Classification of Caladium Species .................................................................. 41 Genome Size Variation in Caladium ................................................................. 43 Chromosome Number Variation in Caladium ................................................... 44 Possible Modes of Genome Size and Chromosome Number Evolution in Caladium ....................................................................................................... 47 Implications for Preservation of Caladium Diversity and Caladium Breeding ... 50 3 SOMACLONAL VARIATION IN CALADIUM ’RED FLASH’ .................................... 62 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 62 Materials and Methods............................................................................................ 63 Plant Materials .................................................................................................. 63 Tissue Culture and Plant Regeneration ............................................................ 64 Plants Acclimatization ...................................................................................... 64 Identification of Somaclonal Variants ............................................................... 65 Determination of Nuclear DNA Contents .......................................................... 66 Data Analysis ................................................................................................... 66 Chromosome Counting .................................................................................... 67 SSR Marker Analysis ....................................................................................... 67 Results .................................................................................................................... 68 Effect of PGR and Explant Type on Plant Regeneration and Occurrence of Somaclonal Variation .................................................................................... 68 Somaclonal Variation and Variant Types ......................................................... 69 Nuclear DNA Contents ..................................................................................... 71 Chromosome Counts ....................................................................................... 72 SSR Marker Profiling ........................................................................................ 73 Discussion .............................................................................................................. 74 4 INHERITANCE OF LEAF RUGOSITY IN CALADIUM ............................................ 86 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 86 Materials and Methods............................................................................................ 87 Plant Materials .................................................................................................. 87 Flower Induction and Crossing ......................................................................... 88 Progeny Growing .............................................................................................. 88 Phenotypic Analysis ......................................................................................... 89 Statistical Analysis ............................................................................................ 89 Results .................................................................................................................... 90 Inheritance of Rugose Leaf .............................................................................. 90 Genetic Relationship between Rugose Leaf and Leaf Shape .......................... 91 Genetic Relationship between Rugose Leaf and Leaf Spotting ........................ 92 Genetic Relationship between Rugose Leaf and Main Vein Color ................... 94 Genetic Distances and Gene Order among Rugose Leaf, Leaf Spotting and Main Vein Color ............................................................................................. 95 Discussion .............................................................................................................. 96 6 5 INHERITANCE OF LEAF BACKGROUND COLOR IN CALADIUM ..................... 111 Introduction ..........................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • ORNAMENTAL GARDEN PLANTS of the GUIANAS: an Historical Perspective of Selected Garden Plants from Guyana, Surinam and French Guiana
    f ORNAMENTAL GARDEN PLANTS OF THE GUIANAS: An Historical Perspective of Selected Garden Plants from Guyana, Surinam and French Guiana Vf•-L - - •• -> 3H. .. h’ - — - ' - - V ' " " - 1« 7-. .. -JZ = IS^ X : TST~ .isf *“**2-rt * * , ' . / * 1 f f r m f l r l. Robert A. DeFilipps D e p a r t m e n t o f B o t a n y Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. \ 1 9 9 2 ORNAMENTAL GARDEN PLANTS OF THE GUIANAS Table of Contents I. Map of the Guianas II. Introduction 1 III. Basic Bibliography 14 IV. Acknowledgements 17 V. Maps of Guyana, Surinam and French Guiana VI. Ornamental Garden Plants of the Guianas Gymnosperms 19 Dicotyledons 24 Monocotyledons 205 VII. Title Page, Maps and Plates Credits 319 VIII. Illustration Credits 321 IX. Common Names Index 345 X. Scientific Names Index 353 XI. Endpiece ORNAMENTAL GARDEN PLANTS OF THE GUIANAS Introduction I. Historical Setting of the Guianan Plant Heritage The Guianas are embedded high in the green shoulder of northern South America, an area once known as the "Wild Coast". They are the only non-Latin American countries in South America, and are situated just north of the Equator in a configuration with the Amazon River of Brazil to the south and the Orinoco River of Venezuela to the west. The three Guianas comprise, from west to east, the countries of Guyana (area: 83,000 square miles; capital: Georgetown), Surinam (area: 63, 037 square miles; capital: Paramaribo) and French Guiana (area: 34, 740 square miles; capital: Cayenne). Perhaps the earliest physical contact between Europeans and the present-day Guianas occurred in 1500 when the Spanish navigator Vincente Yanez Pinzon, after discovering the Amazon River, sailed northwest and entered the Oyapock River, which is now the eastern boundary of French Guiana.
    [Show full text]
  • Leaf Variegation in Caladium Steudneriifolium (Araceae): a Case of Mimicry?
    Evol Ecol (2009) 23:503–512 DOI 10.1007/s10682-008-9248-2 ORIGINAL PAPER Leaf variegation in Caladium steudneriifolium (Araceae): a case of mimicry? Ulf Soltau Æ Stefan Do¨tterl Æ Sigrid Liede-Schumann Received: 27 November 2007 / Accepted: 25 February 2008 / Published online: 6 March 2008 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008 Abstract The leaves of Caladium steudneriifolium (Araceae) of the understorey of a submontane rainforest in the Podocarpus National Park (South East Ecuador, 1,060 m a.s.l.) are plain green or patterned with whitish variegation. Of the 3,413 individual leaves randomly chosen and examined in April 2003, two-thirds were plain green, whereas one third were variegated (i.e., whitish due to absence of chloroplasts). Leaves of both morphs are frequently attacked by mining moth caterpillars. Our BLAST analysis based on Cytochrome-c-Oxidase-subunit-1 sequences suggests that the moth is possibly a member of the Pyraloidea or another microlepidopteran group. It was observed that the variegated leaf zones strongly resemble recent damages caused by mining larvae and therefore may mimic an attack by moth larvae. Infestation was significantly 4–12 times higher for green leaves than for variegated leaves. To test the hypothesis that variegation can be interpreted as mimicry to deter ovipositing moths, we first ruled out the possibility that variegation is a function of canopy density (i.e., that the moths might be attracted or deterred by factors unrelated to the plant). Then plain green leaves were artificially variegated and the number of mining larvae counted after 3 months.
    [Show full text]
  • Leaf Blotching in Caladium
    HORTSCIENCE 44(1):40–43. 2009. (Deng and Harbaugh, 2006; Wilfret, 1986). The presence of leaf spots is controlled by a single locus with two alleles that are inherited Leaf Blotching in Caladium (Araceae) independently from leaf shape but closely linked with the color of the main vein (Deng Is Under Simple Genetic Control and et al., 2008). Another major foliar trait in caladium is Tightly Linked to Vein Color leaf blotching, the occurrence of numerous irregularly shaped color areas between major Zhanao Deng1 and Brent K. Harbaugh veins on leaf blades. Leaf blotches may University of Florida, IFAS, Environmental Horticulture Department, appear singly or coalesce to large areas of Gulf Coast Research and Education Center, 14625 County Road 672, coloration, up to several inches on mature leaves. This pattern of coloration in combi- Wimauma, FL 33598 nation with bright colors has resulted in Additional index words. Caladium ·hortulanum, leaf characteristics, inheritance, breeding, attractive, highly valued and desired cala- ornamental aroids dium cultivars, including Carolyn Whorton and White Christmas. With large pink or Abstract. Cultivated caladiums (Caladium ·hortulanum Birdsey) are valued as important white blotches, ‘Carolyn Whorton’ and pot and landscape plants because of their bright, colorful leaves. Improving leaf ‘White Christmas’ have been the most pop- characteristics or generating new combinations of these characteristics has been one of ular fancy-leaved pink or white cultivars the most important breeding objectives in caladium. A major leaf characteristic in (Bell et al., 1998; Deng et al., 2005). Interest caladium is leaf blotching, the presence of numerous irregularly shaped color areas in incorporating this coloration pattern into between major veins on leaf blades.
    [Show full text]
  • The Exclusively Neotropical Genus Scaphispatha Was Formerly Considered Monospecific. the Type Species
    A REVISION OF SCAPHISPATHA (ARACEAE – CALADIEAE) INCLUDING A NEW SPECIES Eduardo Gomes Gonçalves1 ABSTRACT (A revision of Scaphispatha (Araceae – Caladieae) including a new species) The formerly considered monospecific genus Scaphispatha (Araceae – Caladieae) is here revised. Scaphispatha robusta E.G.Gonç, a second species for the genus is newly described from the Cerrado Biome and the transition Cerrado- Amazonia. It differs from S. gracilis Brongn. ex Schott by the much more robust petioles and leaves, primary lateral veins drying clearer than the lamina, lateral secondary veins conspicously more prominent than tertiary veins and for the female spadix with 11-15 rows of flowers visible in side view. A key to separate both species is provided, as well as ink illustrations and general remarks on the genus. Key-words: Scaphispatha, Cerrado, Caladieae, Araceae, geophyte. RESUMO (Revisão de Scaphispatha (Araceae – Caladieae), incluíndo a descrição de uma nova espécie para o gênero) O gênero Scaphispatha (Araceae – Caladieae), até então considerado monoespecífico, é aqui revisado. Scaphispatha robusta E.G.Gonç., uma segunda espécie para o gênero é descrita para o bioma Cerrado e a transição Cerrado-Amazonia. Difere de S. gracilis Brongn. ex Schott pelos pecíolos e folhas muito mais robustas, nervuras laterais mais claras que o limbo quando secas, nervuras laterais secundárias mais proemi- nentes que as terciárias e pela porção feminina do espádice com 11-15 espirais de flores visíveis em vista lateral. Uma chave para separar as espécies, assim como ilustrações em nanquim e aspectos gerais para o gênero são apresentados. Palavras-chave: Scaphispatha, Cerrado, Caladieae, Araceae, geófita. INTRODUCTION was recognized when plants from Pará state The exclusively neotropical genus (Northern Brazil) flowered in cultivation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Amerindian Charm Plants in the Guianas Tinde Van Andel1* , Sofie Ruysschaert2, Karin Boven3 and Lewis Daly4
    van Andel et al. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine (2015) 11:66 DOI 10.1186/s13002-015-0048-9 JOURNAL OF ETHNOBIOLOGY AND ETHNOMEDICINE RESEARCH Open Access The use of Amerindian charm plants in the Guianas Tinde van Andel1* , Sofie Ruysschaert2, Karin Boven3 and Lewis Daly4 Abstract Background: Magical charm plants to ensure good luck in hunting, fishing, agriculture, love and warfare are known among many Amerindians groups in the Guianas. Documented by anthropologists as social and political markers and exchangeable commodities, these charms have received little attention by ethnobotanists, as they are surrounded by secrecy and are difficult to identify. We compared the use of charm species among indigenous groups in the Guianas to see whether similarity in charm species was related to geographical or cultural proximity. We hypothesized that cultivated plants were more widely shared than wild ones and that charms with underground bulbs were more widely used than those without such organs, as vegetatively propagated plants would facilitate transfer of charm knowledge. Methods: We compiled a list of charm plants from recent fieldwork and supplemented these with information from herbarium collections, historic and recent literature among 11 ethnic groups in the Guianas. To assess similarity in plant use among these groups, we performed a Detrended Component Analysis (DCA) on species level. To see whether cultivated plants or vegetatively propagated species were more widely shared among ethnic groups than wild species or plants without rhizomes, tubers or stem-rooting capacity, we used an independent sample t-test. Results: We recorded 366 charms, representing 145 species. The majority were hunting charms, wild plants, propagated via underground bulbs and grown in villages.
    [Show full text]
  • Ornamental Garden Plants of the Guianas, Part 3
    ; Fig. 170. Solandra longiflora (Solanaceae). 7. Solanum Linnaeus Annual or perennial, armed or unarmed herbs, shrubs, vines or trees. Leaves alternate, simple or compound, sessile or petiolate. Inflorescence an axillary, extra-axillary or terminal raceme, cyme, corymb or panicle. Flowers regular, or sometimes irregular; calyx (4-) 5 (-10)- toothed; corolla rotate, 5 (-6)-lobed. Stamens 5, exserted; anthers united over the style, dehiscing by 2 apical pores. Fruit a 2-celled berry; seeds numerous, reniform. Key to Species 1. Trees or shrubs; stems armed with spines; leaves simple or lobed, not pinnately compound; inflorescence a raceme 1. S. macranthum 1. Vines; stems unarmed; leaves pinnately compound; inflorescence a panicle 2. S. seaforthianum 1. Solanum macranthum Dunal, Solanorum Generumque Affinium Synopsis 43 (1816). AARDAPPELBOOM (Surinam); POTATO TREE. Shrub or tree to 9 m; stems and leaves spiny, pubescent. Leaves simple, toothed or up to 10-lobed, to 40 cm. Inflorescence a 7- to 12-flowered raceme. Corolla 5- or 6-lobed, bluish-purple, to 6.3 cm wide. Range: Brazil. Grown as an ornamental in Surinam (Ostendorf, 1962). 2. Solanum seaforthianum Andrews, Botanists Repository 8(104): t.504 (1808). POTATO CREEPER. Vine to 6 m, with petiole-tendrils; stems and leaves unarmed, glabrous. Leaves pinnately compound with 3-9 leaflets, to 20 cm. Inflorescence a many- flowered panicle. Corolla 5-lobed, blue, purple or pinkish, to 5 cm wide. Range:South America. Grown as an ornamental in Surinam (Ostendorf, 1962). Sterculiaceae Monoecious, dioecious or polygamous trees and shrubs. Leaves alternate, simple to palmately compound, petiolate. Inflorescence an axillary panicle, raceme, cyme or thyrse.
    [Show full text]
  • Caladium Genetics and Breeding: Recent Advances
    ® Floriculture and Ornamental Biotechnology ©2012 Global Science Books Caladium Genetics and Breeding: Recent Advances Zhanao Deng University of Florida/IFAS, Environmental Horticulture Department, Gulf Coast Research and Education Center, 14625 County Road 672, Wimauma, FL 33598, USA Corresponding author : [email protected] ABSTRACT Caladiums are important ornamental aroids; they are valued for their colourful and variably-shaped leaves. Numerous advances have been made in recent decades in caladium breeding and genetic studies. Techniques have been developed to increase flower production, store pollen, and maintain seed viability. Sources of genetic resistance have been identified for important diseases and pests (such as Fusarium tuber rot, Pythium root rot, bacterial blight, and root-knot nematodes) and abiotic stress factors including chilling injury. Mode of inheritance for important foliar traits has been elucidated through analysis of trait segregation in progeny populations. Caladiums have evolved three alleles at one locus that control colour of leaf main veins (red, white or green) and two co-dominant alleles at an independent locus that determine leaf shapes (fancy, lance, or strap). Gene loci for leaf spotting and blotching are both simply inherited but tightly linked to green veins. In vitro culture and plant regeneration were successful with several types of tissues/organs through somatic embryogenesis and/or organogenesis. Shoot-tip culture has been used to eliminate viral and fungal pathogens and invigorate planting stock; protoplasts isolated from leaf callus regenerated into whole plants; foreign genes from maize or humans have been introduced into caladium through Agrobacterium co-cultivation. Molecular markers, including highly specific and informative SSRs, have been developed and applied to caladium to distinguish cultivars, assess genetic diversity, and analyze genetic relationships.
    [Show full text]
  • A REVIEW Summary Dieffenbachia May Well Be the Most Toxic Genus in the Arace
    Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 5 (1982) 293 - 302 293 DIEFFENBACH/A: USES, ABUSES AND TOXIC CONSTITUENTS: A REVIEW JOSEPH ARDITTI and ELOY RODRIGUEZ Department of Developmental and Cell Biology, University of California, Irvine, California 92717 (US.A.) (Received December 28, 1980; accepted June 30, 1981) Summary Dieffenbachia may well be the most toxic genus in the Araceae. Cal­ cium oxalate crystals, a protein and a nitrogen-free compound have been implicated in the toxicity, but the available evidence is unclear. The plants have also been used as food, medicine, stimulants, and to inflict punishment. Introduction Dieffenbachia is a very popular ornamental plant which belongs to the Araceae. One member of the genus, D. seguine, was cultivated in England before 1759 (Barnes and Fox, 1955). At present the variegated D. picta and its numerous cultivars are most popular. The total number of Dieffenbachia plants in American homes is estimated to be in the millions. The plants can be 60 cm to 3 m tall, and have large spotted and/or variegated (white, yellow, green) leaves that may be 30 - 45 cm long and 15 - 20 cm wide. They grow well indoors and in some areas outdoors. Un­ fortunately, however, Dieffenbachia may well be the most toxic genus in the Araceae, a family known for its poisonous plants (Fochtman et al., 1969; Pam el, 1911 ). As a result many children (Morton, 1957, 1971 ), adults (O'Leary and Hyattsville, 1964), and pets are poisoned by Dieffenbachia every year (Table 1 ). Ingestion of even a small portion of stem causes a burn­ ing sensation as well as severe irritation of the mouth, throat and vocal cords (Pohl, 1955).
    [Show full text]
  • 2641-3182 08 Catalogo1 Dicotyledoneae4 Pag2641 ONAG
    2962 - Simaroubaceae Dicotyledoneae Quassia glabra (Engl.) Noot. = Simaba glabra Engl. SIPARUNACEAE Referencias: Pirani, J. R., 1987. Autores: Hausner, G. & Renner, S. S. Quassia praecox (Hassl.) Noot. = Simaba praecox Hassl. Referencias: Pirani, J. R., 1987. 1 género, 1 especie. Quassia trichilioides (A. St.-Hil.) D. Dietr. = Simaba trichilioides A. St.-Hil. Siparuna Aubl. Referencias: Pirani, J. R., 1987. Número de especies: 1 Siparuna guianensis Aubl. Simaba Aubl. Referencias: Renner, S. S. & Hausner, G., 2005. Número de especies: 3, 1 endémica Arbusto o arbolito. Nativa. 0–600 m. Países: PRY(AMA). Simaba glabra Engl. Ejemplares de referencia: PRY[Hassler, E. 11960 (F, G, GH, Sin.: Quassia glabra (Engl.) Noot., Simaba glabra Engl. K, NY)]. subsp. trijuga Hassl., Simaba glabra Engl. var. emarginata Hassl., Simaba glabra Engl. var. inaequilatera Hassl. Referencias: Basualdo, I. Z. & Soria Rey, N., 2002; Fernández Casas, F. J., 1988; Pirani, J. R., 1987, 2002c; SOLANACEAE Sleumer, H. O., 1953b. Arbusto o árbol. Nativa. 0–500 m. Coordinador: Barboza, G. E. Países: ARG(MIS); PRY(AMA, CAA, CON). Autores: Stehmann, J. R. & Semir, J. (Calibrachoa y Ejemplares de referencia: ARG[Molfino, J. F. s.n. (BA)]; Petunia), Matesevach, M., Barboza, G. E., Spooner, PRY[Hassler, E. 10569 (G, LIL, P)]. D. M., Clausen, A. M. & Peralta, I. E. (Solanum sect. Petota), Barboza, G. E., Matesevach, M. & Simaba glabra Engl. var. emarginata Hassl. = Simaba Mentz, L. A. glabra Engl. Referencias: Pirani, J. R., 1987. 41 géneros, 500 especies, 250 especies endémicas, 7 Simaba glabra Engl. var. inaequilatera Hassl. = Simaba especies introducidas. glabra Engl. Referencias: Pirani, J. R., 1987. Acnistus Schott Número de especies: 1 Simaba glabra Engl.
    [Show full text]
  • NJ Native Plants - USDA
    NJ Native Plants - USDA Scientific Name Common Name N/I Family Category National Wetland Indicator Status Thermopsis villosa Aaron's rod N Fabaceae Dicot Rubus depavitus Aberdeen dewberry N Rosaceae Dicot Artemisia absinthium absinthium I Asteraceae Dicot Aplectrum hyemale Adam and Eve N Orchidaceae Monocot FAC-, FACW Yucca filamentosa Adam's needle N Agavaceae Monocot Gentianella quinquefolia agueweed N Gentianaceae Dicot FAC, FACW- Rhamnus alnifolia alderleaf buckthorn N Rhamnaceae Dicot FACU, OBL Medicago sativa alfalfa I Fabaceae Dicot Ranunculus cymbalaria alkali buttercup N Ranunculaceae Dicot OBL Rubus allegheniensis Allegheny blackberry N Rosaceae Dicot UPL, FACW Hieracium paniculatum Allegheny hawkweed N Asteraceae Dicot Mimulus ringens Allegheny monkeyflower N Scrophulariaceae Dicot OBL Ranunculus allegheniensis Allegheny Mountain buttercup N Ranunculaceae Dicot FACU, FAC Prunus alleghaniensis Allegheny plum N Rosaceae Dicot UPL, NI Amelanchier laevis Allegheny serviceberry N Rosaceae Dicot Hylotelephium telephioides Allegheny stonecrop N Crassulaceae Dicot Adlumia fungosa allegheny vine N Fumariaceae Dicot Centaurea transalpina alpine knapweed N Asteraceae Dicot Potamogeton alpinus alpine pondweed N Potamogetonaceae Monocot OBL Viola labradorica alpine violet N Violaceae Dicot FAC Trifolium hybridum alsike clover I Fabaceae Dicot FACU-, FAC Cornus alternifolia alternateleaf dogwood N Cornaceae Dicot Strophostyles helvola amberique-bean N Fabaceae Dicot Puccinellia americana American alkaligrass N Poaceae Monocot Heuchera americana
    [Show full text]
  • Flowers and Foliage Plants
    Florida 4-H Horticulture Identification Form Name Contestant No. County Flowers and Foliage Plants Specimen # Common Name Botanical Name African Violet Saintpaulia spp. Aloe Vera Aloe barbadensis Amaryllis Hippeastrum spp. Beach Sunflower Helianthus debilis Begonia Begonia spp. Bird of Paradise Strelitzia reginae Bird’s Nest Fern Asplenium nidus Blanket Flower Gaillardia spp. Caladium Caladium × spp. Calathea Calathea spp. Canna Canna × generalis Celosia Celosia spp. Chinese Evergreen Aglaonema commutatum Chrysanthemum Dendranthema × grandiflorum Coleus Solenostemon scutellarioides Coreopsis, Tickseed Coreopsis spp. Daylily Hemerocallis spp. Dendrobium Orchids Dendrobium spp. Dianthus Dianthus chinensis Dieffenbachia Dieffenbachia spp. Dracaena Marginata Dracaena marginata English Ivy Hedera helix False Heather, Mexican Heather Cuphea hyssopifolia Geranium Pelargonium × hortorum Gerbera Daisy Gerbera jamesonii Globe Amaranth Gomphrena globosa Heart -Leaf Philodendron Philodendron scandens subsp. oxycarium Holly Fern Cyrtomium falcatum Impatiens Impatiens spp. Jade Plant Crassula argentea Lily of the Nile Agapanthus praecox & Agapanthus ssp. orientalis Marigold Tagetes spp. Moth Orchid Phalaenopsis spp. Neanthe Bella Palm Chamaedorea elegans Pentas Pentas lanceolata Peperomia Peperomia spp. Periwinkle Catharanthus roseus Pothos Epipremnum pinnatum ‘Aureum’ Salvia Salvia spp. Sansevieria Sansevieria spp. Spathiphyllum Spathiphyllum spp. Spider Plant Chlorophytum comosum Ti Plant Cordyline terminalis Torenia, Wishbone Flower Torenia fournieri Verbena Verbenia × hybrida Wax Plant Hoya carnosa Weeping Fig Ficus benjamina Zebra Plant Aphelandra squarrosa Zinnia Zinnia elegans ZZ Plant Zamioculcas zamiifolia .
    [Show full text]