Mayor Patrick Slayter City Council r~~nda Report Reviewed by. — Neysa Hinton, Vice Mayor City of Sebastopol City Manager/City Atto Michael Carnacchi 02 Sarah Glade Gurney Una Glass
City Ma aper/C ty Aftorney Larry McLaughlin Meeting Date: Meeting of May 1, 2018 City Clerk To: Mayor and City Council Mary Gourfey From: Kenyon Webster, Planning Director Dana Morrison, Assistant Planner Subject: Approval of Design for New Restroom Project, Burbank Experiment Farm- Park Project Review Recommandation: Approve Design Applicant: West Sonoma County Historical Society Address: 7777 Bodega Avenue Funding: Currently Budgeted:_ Yes X No ...... NIA
Introduction: This staff report addresses a proposed new restroom facility at the Luther Burbank Experiment Farm, located at 7777 Bodega Avenue. The Planning Commission, which serves as the ‘parks board’ for the City, reviewed the proposed project at their April 10, 2018 meeting. The Planning Commission was supportive of the project and did not raise any concerns regarding the project; baring the consensus that an agreement for the maintenance, cleaning and opening/closing of the bathrooms should be determined. The Commission recommended the project to the City Council for approval. Funding and other aspects of this project will be addressed in the City’s budget process. Background: The Luther Burbank Experiment Farm is located in and owned by the City of Sebastopol, and is considered a public park. The property is maintained by volunteers, who are members of the West Sonoma County Historical Society. Currently, there is an existing historic cottage on site which has a bathroom, but which is not ADA compliant. Altering the cottage to ensure compliance with handicap accessible codes would be difficult and could potentially compromise the historic nature of the cottage; which was built in 1906 and restored in the 1960’s. A small barn is also located on site, but does not have adequate space to accommodate the proposed restrooms. Project Descriøtion: The West Sonoma County Historical Society is looking to add an ADA compliant restroom to the existing Luther Burbank Experiment Farm facility. Specifically the request involves a proposal
1 to build a small freestanding building to serve as a much needed restroom. The building will house two restrooms, one for women and one for men. The new building will be largely, but not completely, screened from view by trees and bushes. The construction also includes an accessible path from the nearby parking lot. The 192 square foot bathroom facility will be detailed to complement the existing architectural style of the existing cottage and barn. The attached materials from the applicant explain its location, and provide its design.
The site is zoned as Community Facility.
In accordance with CEQA regulations and guidelines, Evans and De Shazo Inc. (EDS) conducted an Archaeological Study to determine if there are archaeological resources present that could be impacted by the proposed restroom project. The study did not result in the identification of any archaeological sites within the project area. Therefore, no impacts to archaeological resources is expected to occur as a result of the proposed project. Due to the lack of archaeological resources identified, EDS had no project-specific recommendations to make however, general recommendations were provided at the end of the report in the event that any archaeological resources are discovered during earth-moving activities associated with the project.
Environmental Review:
As a small improvement to an existing facility, the project is exempt under CEQA, per Class 1, existing facilities.
Public Comment:
The Planning Department has not received any comments on the application from the public, as of writing the staff report.
Departmental Comment:
The application was routed to the following departments: Building, Fire, Police, Engineering and Public Works. The Police Chief stated the following: “No law enforcement concerns or conditions. Although a bathroom screened from view may lessen security (if people can hide from view).” In addition, the Public Works department added construction notes on the site plan which are attached to the end of this report.
Analysis:
The proposed project would be constructed in an already-developed area and is very minor in scope. Staff has not identified issues from a parks perspective.
Parks are a permitted use in the CF, Community Facility District.
The purpose of the CF District is to implement the “Community Facilities”, “Parks” and “Open Space” land use categories of the General Plan. This district is applicable to lands accommodating governmental, public utility, and educational facilities, as well as parks and open space land in public ownership. There are development standards in the CF District which are outlined below.
Development Standard CF: Requirements Proposed Maximum building height 32 ft. l4ft. 5 in. 2 Minimum building setbacks - - Front Yard 15 ft. 480 ft. Side Yard 5 ft. 5.5 ft. Rear Yard 15 ft. 46 ft. Floor area ratio 0.10 0.0014
The proposed project is in conformance with the development standards of the CF District.
Funding, Other Aspects:
A funding request regarding this project has been submitted to the Budget Committee for consideration in the budget process. Other aspects of the project construction may need further City review.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council approved the project design.
Attachments:
Project information submitted by applicant:
- Master Planning Application Form
- Written Statement
- Photos
- Site Plan! Approximate Property Lines
- Parcel Map
- Archeological Study
- Plans
- Construction notes from Dante
- Minutes from 4.10.18 PC Meeting
3 City of Sebastopoi Planning Department 7120 Bodega Avenue Sebastopol, CA 95472 (707) 823-6167 (Phone) or (707) 823-1135 (Fax) www.ci.sebastopol.ca.us MASTER PLANNING APPLICATION FORM
PROJECT INFORMATION: Fon CITY USE ONLY PLANNING FILE #: ~ 1 E~/ 2E3
DATE FILED: ITh≥L -. I
TOTAL FEES PAID: $ ,~~)/r’
RECEIVED BVcV~~~~’\
DATE APPLICATION
DEEMED COMPLETE: ______
APPLUCAUT OR A~NT: / 4 OWNER OF PROPERTY ~ (4’6~J~ IF OTHER THANAPPLICANT: Name: ‘lie’ C.Awcc I14;9c~ Name: di7y C/-’
Email Address: &XI,C~. ,v~7 Email Address: ______
Mailing Address: ~~fZ4~6 ,dvt Mailing Address: ______
City/State/Zip: t_-~MJ7&flL ~2 City/State/Zip: ______Phone: 7nz 64fl 9775 Phone:
Fax: Fax: ______
Business License #: A-’,9 Business License #:
Signature: ~ Signature: / CeIl/fr that this application is being made with my consent. Date: // 7 Date:
OTHER PERSONS TO BE NOTIFIED: (Include Agents, Architects, Engineers, etc.).
Name: ,1/4 Name: C—rAvi8 94Jamca~c2 C-cE 7, /
Email Address: ,“J~5~Ø C,C cP Email Address: ______
Mailing Address: On- / fl1~e~. d&&EZA 14ve; Mailing Address: S&&;4-rñ ~~4/h~7d~e City/State/Zip: Jsnsiev~ot tst’7Z City/State/Zip: ~_Ct~~-4 .t~c4 L≤-i_~c27 Phone: ~?e9 9~~y~5 Phone: %~543 376y
Fax: ______Fax: ______- C ‘)nndr
Master Planning Application FornV2OI 7-18 Planning Fees/Last updated: 1/2118 @ 2:1 ~ Page I PROJECT DESCRllPT~ON:
DESCRIBE IN DETAIL, the proposed project and permit request. (Attach additional pages, if needed): 4- ,&‘/t-,) I ,eerrea~~v
Se //;t’gic Ste, ~itt j3e •r~ a ma I / / I /
This application includes the checklist for the type of application requested: C Yes C No
Please indicate the type(s) of application that is being requested (example: Use Permit, Design Review, Variance, Planned Community Rezone, etc.):
Please describe existing uses (businesses, residences, etc.) and other structures on the property:
fl~ ii ~e r//~ 8G≤)/C ~ I / F.
/~ ~ /o VE ~4 -
DEVELOPMENT DATA:
SQUARE FEET BUILDING EXISTING: ~/A SQUARE FEET BUILDING DEMOLISHED: ~/A SQUARE FEET BUILDING NEW: /fe C N/A NET CHANGE IN BUILDING SQUARE FEET: Fl N/A C 0 Bedrooms C 1 Bedrooms NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS EXISTING: C 2 Bedrooms C 3 Bedrooms C 4+ Bedrooms ~-N / A C 0 Bedrooms C 1 Bedrooms NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS PROPOSED: C 2 Bedrooms C 3 Bedrooms C 4+ Bedrooms ~‘~N / A NET CHANGE IN DWELLING UNITS: imN7 A Existing: Proposed:
D Front Yard C Front Yard SETBAcKS: D Side Yard C Side Yard C Rear Yard C Rear Yard ~‘N /A C N/A
Master Planning Application ForniJZOl7-l8 Planning Fees/Last updated: 1/2/IS @2:13 PM Page 2 Will the project involve a new curb cut or driveway? C Yes C1~o Are there existing easements on the property? LW~es C No
Will Trees be removed? C Yes If yes, v/ease describe (Example: Type, Size. Location on
Will Existing Landscaping be revised? C Yes If yes, what is square footage of new or revised landscaping?
E Will Signs be Changed or Added? ~ C No
Business: Hours of Operation? Open: ______Close: ______Is alcohol service proposed? C Yes If yes, what type of State alcohol license is proposed? If yes, have you applied to the State Alcoholic Beverage Control for a license? C Yes if this is a restaurant, café or other food service, bar, or nightclub, please indicate total number of seats: Is any live entertainment proposed? C Yes C-’
If yes, please describe: ______
Master Planning Application FornV2O] 7-IS Planning Fees/Last updated: 1/2/I S @ 2:13 PM Page 3 DN!D!Eh11dh~1FOCATIION AGP1EEUkI~Er~T
As part of this application, applicant agrees to defend, indemnify, release and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers, attorneys, employees, boards and commissions from any claim, action or proceeding brought against any of the foregoing indiyiduals or entities, the purpose of which is to attack, set aside, void or annul the approval of this application or the adoption of the environmental document which accompanies it or otherwise arises out of or in connection with the City’s action on this application. This indemnification shall include, but not be limited to, damages, costs, expenses, attorney fees or expert witness fees that may be asserted by any person or entity, including the applicant, arising out of or in connection with the City’s action on this application, whether or not there is concurrent passive or active negligence on the part of the City.
If, f~ any rpa~öW~tny portion of this indemnification agreement is held to be void or unenforceable by a court of competent j~jptiction1 the remainder of the greement shall remain in full force and effect. ~ ~~ry 4~ Applicant’s Signat/e ‘Date,~i~ned 1/ Zo’ Planning File Number
NOTE: The purpose of the indemnification agreement is to allow the City to be held harmless in terms of potential legal costs and liabilities in conjunction with permit processing and approval.
NOTICE OF MAILING:
Email addresses or facsimiles will be used for sending out staff reports and agendas to applicants, their representatives, property owners, and others to be notified.
Please sign and acknowledge you have been notified of the Notice of Mailing for applications and have provided an email address or fax number.
/ ~I ______~O~W\QO, D ~Q. Signature / Printed Name
NOTh: It is the responsibility of the applicant and their representative to be aware of an abide by City laws and policies. City staff, Boards, Commissions, and the City Council will review applications as required by law; however the applicant has responsibility for determining and following applicable regulations.
Master Planning Application Pornt/2017-18 Planning Fees/Last updated: 1/2/18 @ 2:13 PM Page 4 NE~GO1BOR ~‘liOTIIF~CA uiO~
In the interest of being a good neighbor, it is highly recommended that you contact those homes or businesses directly adjacent to, or within the area of your project. Please inform them of the proposed project, including construction activity and possible impacts such as noise, traffic interruptions, dust, larger structures, tree removals, etc.
Many projects in Sebastopol are remodel projects which when initiated bring concern to neighboring property owners, resident and businesses. Construction activities can be disruptive, and additions or new buildings can affect privacy, sunlight or landscaping. Some of these concerns can be alleviated by neighbor-to-neighbor contacts early in the design and construction process.
It is a ‘good neighbor policy” to inform your neighbors so that they understand your project. This will enable you to begin your construction with the understanding of your neighbors and will help promote good neighborhood relationships.
Many times development projects can have an adverse effect on the tranquility of neighborhoods and tarnish relationships along the way. If you should have questions about who to contact or need property owner information in your immediate vicinity, please contact the Building and Safety Department for information at (707) 823-8597, or the Planning Department at (707) 823-6167. I have informed site neighbors of my proposed project: C Yes No If yes, or if you will inform neighbors in the future, please describe outreach efforts:
~ WEBS~TE REQUARED FOR MAJOR PROJECTS
Applicants for major development projects (which involves proposed development of 25,000 square feet of new floor area or greater, or 25 or more dwelling units), are required to create a project website in conjunction with submittal of an application for Planning approval (including but not limited to Subdivisions, Use Permits, Rezoning’s, and Design Review). Required information may be provided on an existing applicant web site
The website address shall be provided as part of the application. The website shall be maintained and updated, as needed until final discretionary approvals are obtained for the project.
Such website shall include, at a minimum, the following information:
Project description q Contact information for the applicant, including address, phone number, and email address q Map showing project location ~J Photographs of project site q Project plans and drawings
Master Planning Application Fonn/20]7.J 8 Planning Fees/Last updated: 1/2/18 @2:13 PM Page 5 Luther Burbank Experiment Farm 7777 Bodega Avenue, Sebastopol California NARRATIVE To accompany master planning application February 2018
The Luther Burbank Experiment Farm is a unique property, located in and owned by the city of Sebastopol. The property is maintained by volunteers, members of the West Sonoma County Historical Society. The City has declared the farm to be a public park. There is an historic cottage on the property. The City maintains the exterior walls, roof, plumbing and electrical systems, while volunteers maintain the interior space. There is a toilet room in the cottage, which does not comply with handicap access codes. It would be very difficult to make the existing toilet room comply without compromising the historic nature of the cottage. The cottage was completely rebuilt after the 1906 earthquake, and then restored in the 1960s. A small barn, built by volunteers about 20 years ago, is used for storage of a tractor, and tools and supplies. There is no toilet in the barn. There is not adequate space in the barn to accommodate toilet rooms. The exterior of the barn was designed and built to coordinate with the historic cottage. This proposal is to build a small freestanding building. The building will have two restrooms, one for women and one for men. The new restroom building will be largely but not completely screened from view by trees and bushes. The new building will be served by a handicap accessible path from the nearby parking area end.
FEB 2 0 7018 7,
HI. ‘S., -; u.~
I, • -:~. - ‘C
—
a..’-’
~
‘I
a
~1&~ ~ I •% _p_l .,‘ t St b ‘Ic 4
‘ ,‘~
• ~ 4IL~-
H ~ 4! I .0•~$.
A I
0;
ft a an. 0~ S Parcel Map No. 2402 REC. 06—25-197; IN BK. 155, MIPS, P65. 32 COIJN7Y ASSESSOR’S PARCEL MAP 0 TAX RATE AREA Parcel Map No. 3167 * 155—007 5—001 5—026 060—22 REC. 70—30-7972 IN SIC 187, MIPS, P05. 39 Parcel Map No. 3510 BOOEGA HIGHWAY 155—009 5—02 1 REC 07-09-797,3 IN 5K 793, MAPS. P05. 49 Parcel Map No. 4447 REC. 09—30—7974 INBK2/3, MAPS. P05. 42 Parcel Map No. 5660 REC. 07—79—7977 IN 81(255, MAPS. POS. 46 04 Parcel Map Na. 25 5—026 37 REC. 07—02-1975 IN 81(223, MIPS. P05. 23 9CC. Parcel Map No. 5464 09—07—1977 IN BK 256 MIPS. PCS. 43 Reversion to Acreage Parcel Map No. PEC 01—03-1977 IN BK. 245, MIfiS, P05. 28 9CC. 6084 12—23—7977 IN BK 263, MIPS. P05. 07 Parcel Mop No. 5038 REC 03 10 1977 IN 91(248. MAPS, P65. 25 68
p/S •a7/39 04 40
,/24
97/07 709/05—06
-SB- 38
w
p/S 5 73/09 RE’OISED
R/S 54 7/06 04 27—O7Cor—l,W rRD 10 I 5—0782m(22 1)—lw \\ 03 27—08=R/S—LW 04 04—08=t~—K0 I0—08—15..Cor—KB Parcel Map No. 6365 02 15—17=Cor—KO REC 72-26-1978 IN BK 28?, MAPS, POS. 44 0 ‘50 ‘ax NorE: this ‘nap —as p,epored for ASsessment I Parcel Map No. 97 REC. 08-13—198.3 IN 91(347 • MIPS P05. 72-13 ~ NOTE: Assessors parcels do no I necessarily pulponenlegality orachya reedand buildingdoos notsiteindicateNO liahilityci Iher isparcel I constitute legal lots. To verity legal parcel status, esso.med br the accuracy at lire dots delineated. I Parcel Map No. 104 check with the appropriate city or county SnçøiedteThe arrearslineaugAssessorbased en(i C INCrecordedinlorniollan50mev unap4I REC 17-07-7985 IN 81(374, MIPS, 705 44-45 Assessor’s Map Bk. 060, Pg. 22 community development or planning divi&on. recorded deeds, prior os.eeau’neat mops, eta) Parcel Map Na. /21 Sonoma County, Ca/if (ACID) REC 09-25-7989 IN BK 443 MAPS, P05. 46-47 KEY 70-02—75 KB F. v
RESULTS OF AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDY FOR THE PROPOSED RESTROOM FACILITY WIHTIN THE LUTHER BURBANK GOLD RIDGE E PERIMENTAL FARM, 7777 BODEGA AVENUE, SEBASTOPOL, SONOMA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
PREPARED FOR: City of Sebastopol do Western Sonoma County Historical Society
PREPARED BY: Sally Evans, MA., RPA FE-S 20 ZOlS Principal Archaeologist Evans & De Shazo, LLC [email protected]
August 19, 2017 (updated February 16, 2018) www.evans-deshazo.com (J-2017-06-AO1-o151) EVANS D~ SHAZO, INC AIICTI;’EOIOGV II STall r TRESEIIVATION
STATEMENT OF CONRDENTDALDTY This report identifies the locations of cultural resources within the City of Sebastopol that is confidential information because archaeological sites are nonrenewable resources that can be significantly Impacted by disturbances that can affect their cultural, scientific, and artistic values. Disclosure of this information to the public may be in violation of both federal and state laws. Applicable U.S. laws include, but may not be limited to, Section 304 of the National Historic Preservation Act (16 usc 470w-3) and the Archaeological Resources Protection Act (16 USC 470hh). California state laws that apply include, but may not be limited to, Government Code Sections 6250 et seq. and 6254 et seq. Furthermore, disclosure of archaeological site location information to individuals other than those meeting the U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s professional standards or california State Personnel Board criteria for Associate State Archaeologist or State Historian Ii violates the California Office of Historic Preservation’s records access policy.
Evans & De Shozo, Inc. Page i ~, EVANS DE SHAZO, INC ‘~~~~AftcTI.4roloov II ISTOR Ir nItI:xI:Itv:~TIc,N
TaMe of Contents STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY INTRODUCTION 1 PROJECT LOCATION 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 REGULATORY SETtING 4
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Act 4
CULTURAL SETTING 6
PREHISTORIC SETrING 6 ETHNOGRAPHIC SETtING 8 HISTORIC PERIOD SETTING 10 HISTORY OF LUTHER BURBANK AND Gow RIDGE FARM 13
METHODS USED TO IDENTIFY ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 16
RECORD SEARCH AND REVIEW 17 NATIVE AMERICAN SACRED SITES INVENTORY AND CONSULTATION 17 FIELD SURVEY 17
RESULTS OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDY 17
RESULTS OF RECORD SEARCH AND REVIEW 18 RESULTS OF SACRED SITES INVENTORY AND NATIVE AMERICAN CONSULTATION 21 RESULTS OF FIELD SURVEY 22 CONCLUSIONS 24 RECOMMENDATIONS 25 REFERENCES CITED 26 APPENDIX A: CORRESPONDANCE RELATED TO SACRED SITES INVENTORY AND NATIVE AMERICAN CONSULTATION
Evans & DeShazo, Inc. Page ii ? ,?AIWIIAEOLOGYEVANS(53DEFIISTOLOCSHAZO,PIIESrItv,vrwNINC
IINTRODUCTDON Evans & De Shazo (EDS), at the request of the Western Sonoma County Historical Society (WSCHR), conducted a Secretary of Interior Standards Review and an archaeological study for the proposed project located within Luther Burbank’s Gold Ridge Experimental Farm (Gold Ridge Farm) located at 7777 Bodega Avenue, Sebastopol, Sonoma County, California1. The proposed Project includes the construction of a single-story building that will serve as a public restroom, and a gravel walkway that will lead from an existing parking lot to the new restroom building (Project). The Gold Ridge Farm includes a ca. 1910 cottage and a 1997 barn located within a 3-acre parcel that was originally part of the 18-acre property purchased by Luther Burbank in 1885, The 3-acre parcel is owned by the City of Sebastopol, but is maintained by the WSCHS, a non-profit organization. The Gold Ridge Farm is listed on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) (#78000803), the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR), and is locally listed (Peterson and Peterson 1991). In compliance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), due to the potential for the proposed Project to impact a Historical Resource, the City of Sebastopol has required an archaeological study and a Secretary of Interior Standards review to determine if the proposed Project will impact historical resources. OS Principal Archaeologist, Sally Evans, M.A., RPA, who exceeds the Secretary of Interior’s professional qualification standards in Archaeology conducted an archeological study of the Project Area. The results of the study are presented herein. EDS Principal Architectural Historian, Stacey De Shazo, M.A., completed a Standards compliance review to determine if the propose Project will impact existing built- environment resources, the results of which are presented in a separate report titled “Secretary of Interior Standards Compliance Review of the Luther Burbank Said Ridge Experimental Farm Project Located at 777 Bodega Avenue, Sebastapol, Sonoma County, California.”
PROJECT LOCATDON The Gold Ridge Farm is located one mile west of downtown Sebastopol at 7777 Bodega Avenue, Sebastopol, Sonoma County, within the 3-acre Assessor Parcel Number (APN) 060-222-028. The Gold Ridge Farm is bounded by the Sebastopol Memorial Lawn cemetery on the west, Bodega Avenue on the north, Burbank Heights and Orchard senior apartments to the east and south. The USGS 7.5-minute Sebastopol quadrangle (1980) (Figure 1) shows the property located within unsectioned land of Township 6 North, Range 9 West, Mt. Diablo Base and Meridian. The Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) grid coordinates at the approximate center of the project area are: 4249885 meters North and 514418 meters East Zone 10. The Project Area is located at the south end of the 3-acre property approximately 150 feet west of the ca. 1910 cottage (Figure 2). PROJECT DESCRÜPTDON The proposed Project entails the construction of a new 16 x 12-foot, single-story restroom building and a gravel walkway leading from the existing paved parking lot to the new building. The new building will be situated approximately 70 feet west of the existing 1997 barn and 150 feet west of the ca. 1910 cottage (Figure 3).
‘EDS conducted the studies pro bono as a courtesy to the wscHs.
Evans& DeShazo, Inc Page 1 EVANS BE SHAZO, INC iRCIIAEOI.O(fl IIIS1ORI( pxrsnn’ATION
~.
S
.4,
S.Tb.u:uj.. I
—
Project Location
op guI 20 3 NaILOnO Goog phic .≥ocety •.çij
o 0.25 0.5 I MIles 1:24,000 • I
Project Location Map Legend Luther Burbank Gold Ridge Experiment Fa,m C Project LccaUon 7777 Bodega Avenue. Sebastopol. Sonoma Count~ CA APN 060-222-029 (322 acres)
I~VANS&P~A’i~i?: iMt . . . -
Figure 1.: Gold Ridge Farm property shown on the USGS 7.5-minute quadrangle (1380).
Evans & De Shazo, Inc Page 2 EVANS DE SHAZO, INC ~~~yAEtC~FIAYOWGy FE WRTh IC’ I’xr.SEItVATION
G o 62.5I 125I 250 Feet 1:1,000 Project Location Map Legend Geld Ridge Farm 7777 Bodega Avenue. Sebastopol, Sonoma County. California J~ ProjectArea APN 060-222-028 (3-acres) J5G~ ~ Quodrangth Sobtstepel (1980) t4jW/ ~A~$s ~ ThwnsIiIp 6 North 410 V, Zr ((N Range 2£ Wool
Figure 2: Aerial view of the Project Area location within the 3-acre Gold Ridge Farm property.
Evans & De Shazo, Inc Page 3 EVANS DE SHAZO, INC EI{SU(N~TC ItISI~V,\I’io~J
U.?,, I
-
I’APi
Figure 3: Layout of proposed new restroom building.
REGULATORY SET~IING The project is subject to CEQA regulations and guidelines as described below.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
CEQA and the guidelines for implementing CEQA (State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15064.5) give direction and guidance for evaluation of properties as well as the preparation of Initial Studies (that include a CRE), Categorical Exemptions, Negative Declarations, Mitigated Negative Declarations, and Environmental Impact Reports (EIR5). According to CEQA, cultural resources (i.e. building, structure, object, site or districts) and Tribal Cultural Resources are aspects of the environment that require identification and assessment for potential significance. According to California Code of Regulations §15064.5, cultural resources are historically significant if they are:
o Listed in, or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historic Resources (CRHR) (Public Resources Code 5024.1, Title 14 CCR, Section 4850 et. seq.);
o Listed in, or eligible for listing in, the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP);
Evans & De Shazo, Inc Page 4 EVANS £~ D~ SUAZO, INC AIICTTAIOLOGV ~.._J IIISfl)ItIC pIcI:SERVATION
a Included in a local register of historical resources, as defined in an historical resource survey meeting the requirements of Section 5024.1(g) of the Public Resource Code; or
o Any object, building, structure, site, area, place, record, or manuscript which a lead agency determines to be historically significant or significant in the architectural, engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational, social, political, military, or cultural annals of California, provided the lead agency’s determination is supported by substantial evidence in light of the whole record.
California Register of Historical Resources As stated in subdivision (c) of §5024.1, a resource may be listed as an historical resource in the California Register if it has integrity and meets any of the following National Register of Historic Places criteria:
1) Associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local or regional history or the cultural heritage of California or the United States;
2) Associated with the lives of persons important to local, California or national history;
3) Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region or method of construction or represents the work of a master or possesses high artistic values; or
4) Has yielded, or has the potential to yield, information important to the prehistory or history of the local area, California or the nation.
Buildings, sites, structures, objects, and districts representative of California and United States history, architecture, archaeology, engineering, and culture convey significance when they also possess integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. A resource has integrity if it retains the characteristics that were present during the resource’s period of significance. Enough of these characteristics must remain to convey the reasons for its significance.
Unique Archaeological Resources CEQA (PRC §21083.2) distinguishes between two classes of archaeological resources: archaeological sites that meet the definition of an historical resource as described above, and “unique archaeological resources.” A unique archaeological resource is defined as an archaeological artifact, object, or site about which it can be clearly demonstrated that without merely adding to the current body of knowledge, there is a high probability that it meets any of the following criteria: 1. Contains information needed to answer important scientific research questions and that there is a demonstrable public interest in that information, 2. Has a special and particular quality such as being the oldest of its type or the best available example of its type, or 3. is directly associated with a scientifically recognized important prehistoric or historic event or person.
Evans & De Shazo, Inc Page 5 1> EVANS DE SHAZO, INC ,~ WTIAF.nI.oc;y H SIOIOC pRrs~m varluN
Tribal Cultural Resources According to Public Resource Code §21074, Tribal Cultural Resources (TCRs) are: 1. Sites, features, places, cultural landscapes, sacred places, or objects with cultural value to a California Native American tribe that are either (A) included or determined to be eligible for inclusion in the CRHR, or (B) included in a local register of historical resources as defined in subdivision (k) of §3020.1.; or,
2. A resource that the lead agency chooses, In its discretion and supported by substantial evidence,
to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of ~5024.1 - taking into account the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe.
CULTURAL SETTiNG This section of the report provides a pre-contact, ethnographic and historic setting of the Sebastopol area. Each setting provides the basis for understanding the types of archaeological resources that are potentially located within the Project Area and how they may relate to broader patterns of resource use, changing environmental conditions, and settlement of the region. The cultural setting is also used in part as the basis for determining the significance of archaeological resources that are potentially located within the Project Area.
PREHISTORIC SETTING Archaeologist, David A. Fredrickson (1974) provides a chronology that forms the framework many archaeologists use to interpret and define Sonoma County prehistory. Fredrickson’s taxonomy consists of broad time periods defined by shifts in adaptive patterns that reflect changes in the environment and the movement and influences of native groups within a region. He defined three periods for the North
Coast Ranges, including the Paleo-lndian Period (ca. 10,000-6000 B.C.); Archaic Period (6000 BC - AD 500) that is divided into the Lower Archaic (6000-3000 BC), Middle Archaic (3000-1000 BC) and Upper
Archaic (1000 BC - AD 500) periods; and the Emergent Period (AD 500-1500). These time periods are further defined by spatial and cultural units called Patterns, Phases, and Aspects. Patterns are units of culture having similar economic and technical manifestations, mortuary patterns, concepts of wealth, and trade practices. Phases are cultural manifestations within a Pattern bounded by time and place. Aspects are cultural units bounded regionally, but not temporally (Fredrickson 1973, 1974). Fredrickson (1989) defined Aspects specific to the Santa Rosa Plain, and these include the Spring Lake Aspect of the Borax Lake Pattern in the Lower Archaic Period, the Black Hills Aspect of the Mendocino Pattern in the Middle Archaic Period, the l.aguna Aspect of the Berkeley Pattern in the Upper Archaic Period, and the Rincon and Gables Aspects of the Augustine Pattern in the Emergent Period.
Paleo-lndian Period (Ca. 10,000-6000 B.C.) Sonoma County was inhabited during the Paleo-lndian Period, as indicated by the presence of fluted projectile points and chipped stone crescents that have been found in a few archaeological sites located in Sonoma County nearthe Laguna de Santa Rosa, Bodega Bay, and Warm Springs Creek dam, as well as in the neighboring Mendocino and Lake counties. Based on limited archaeological evidence from this period, it appears populations within and surrounding Sonoma County consisted of small, highly mobile
Evans & De Show, Inc Page 6 ;,> EVANS JJ~ SHAZO, INC ARC’ I,~EOl.OGV ‘r~rioh’ IC pN~;srRvAr~c,N
groups that practiced broad-spectrum hunting and gathering techniques. Research conducted by Jones and Hayes (1989, 1993) indicates that Paleo-lndlan forgers in the Santa Rosa and Sebastopol areas focused on resources located near lakes, wetlands, and riparian zones during this time.
Lower Archaic Period (6000-3000 B.C.) Several sites in Sonoma County date to the Lower Archaic Period and contain artifacts consistent with a mobile hunting and gathering economy. Mobile foragers appeared to have resided in camps situated along marshes and on grasslands and utilized the surrounding uplands to acquire a wide array of food resources available in those areas on a seasonal basis. The types of artifacts that are found in archaeological sites dating to this period include large, wide-stemmed projectile points, cobble tools, handstones, and milling slabs. These artifacts are characteristic of the Borax Lake Pattern, a distinctive cultural pattern recognized throughout much of the North Coast Ranges during this time. In Sonoma County, the Borax Lake Pattern is recognized by the Spring Lake Aspect, specifically at sites located in Santa Rosa and Duncan’s l.anding on the Sonoma Coast. A pre-contact archaeological site located in the Rincon Valley area of Santa Rosa, known as CA-Son-20, is the “type site” for the Spring Lake Aspect. This site dates to 6300 B.C. and contains artifacts such as wide-stemmed points, milling slabs and handstones (Wickstrom and Fredrickson 1989).
Middle Archaic Period (3000-1000 B.C.) As in the Lower Archaic period, mobile foragers on the Santa Rosa Plain during the Middle Archaic Period resided in camps situated along marshes and on grasslands and utilized the surrounding uplands to hunt and gather a wide array of plant and animal resources available in those areas on a seasonal basis. During this period, the Borax Lake Pattern was replaced by the Mendocino Pattern, characterized by groups practicing a more localized foraging strategy. Mendocino Pattern sites are well-represented on the Santa Rosa Plain. According to Fredrickson (1989), there was overlapping use of the Laguna de Santa Rosa area by both mobile foragers (Black Hills Phase of the Mendocino Pattern) and collectors (Laguna Phase of the Berkeley Pattern) between 1500 B.C. and AL. 1. By 1000 B.C., it is thought that Berkeley Pattern groups, who were more sedentary and practiced a collecting economic strategy, began to spread into the Santa Rosa Plain while mobile Mendocino Pattern foragers focused on the surrounding uplands. The Middle Archaic Period was also marked by new ground stone technology, as well as an increase in trade, which is evident by cut marine shell (Oliveilci sp.) beads, often found in association with burials. Formalized exchange relationships appear to have been established in the flake stone industry as well, which is indicated by a greater amount of obsidian originating from sources in Napa Valley rather than the locally available obsidian source at Annadel in Santa Rosa. Furthermore, mortars and pestles first appear in sites dating to this period, and this is thought to signal an increased dietary reliance on acorns rather than hard seeds, and a concomitant increase in sedentism. The Middle Archaic Period was also marked by significant climatic changes during which warmer and drier conditions led to the reduction of lake basins in southern California, and across California there is a general decrease in the number of sites. This is thought to be the result of a reduced population during this time; however, it is suggested that the paucity of sites may not be due to a decrease in population, but rather may related to a period of increased alluvial deposition that buried many former living surfaces that date to this period (Meyer and Rosenthal 2007; Milllken et al. 2007).
Evans & De Shazo, Inc Page 7 ~, EVANS £~ Dn SHAZO, INC ~ .•~RcTJA~oLor.v ~._J iI~roLtIr PkESI;RVATIOM
Upper Archaic Period (1000 B.C. - A.D. 500) The Upper Archaic Period was characterized by cooler conditions accompanied by increased precipitation in northern and central California, which likely resulted in more favorable conditions for human occupation. Sites dating to this period demonstrate marked differences In their constituents relative to Borax Lake Pattern sites of the Middle Archaic Period. These new occupations are ascribed to the Berkeley Pattern, which appears to have originated in the Clear Lake area during the Lower Archaic Period. Although firm dating for the end of the Borax Lake Pattern is lacking, it is believed to have been replaced by the Berkeley Pattern (possibly representing Miwokan influence) about 500 B.C. (Moratto 1984:517). Berkeley Pattern sites are characterized by a higher degree of sedentism, a highly developed bone tool industry, numerous mortars and pestles that further imply a greater reliance on acorns, and tightly flexed burials with few to no associated artifacts or preference toward orientation. When present, associated burial artifacts typically include Olivella saddle and saucer beads and Haliotis pendants (Milliken et al. 2007). The Berkeley Pattern is represented at archaeological sites in Sonoma, Napa and Lake counties.
Emergent Period (A.D. 500-1500) Although A.D. 500 is marked as the beginning of the Lower Emergent Period, more recent work suggests the beginning of the l.ower Emergent Period may not have occurred until •around AiX 1000. The Emergent Period is thought to be associated with a new level of sedentism, status ascription, ceremonial integration, and regional trade, as indicated by the presence of finished artifacts and food remains that could not be obtained locally; and this is referred to as the Augustine Pattern. There appears to have been a diversity of socioeconomic strategIes associated with Augustine Pattern sites in the North Bay, with some sites revealing a continuance of sedentary systems initiated by the Berkeley Pattern and others apparently resulting from mobile foraging adaptations. The North Bay became the “seat of innovation” during the Upper Emergent Period, as new ornament forms and technologies emerged, such as the bow and arrow, toggle harpoon, hopper mortar, clamshell disk beads, and steatite and magnesite beads and tubes (Milliken et al. 2007). This period was marked by wide-ranging changes in OIive!Ia bead forms and their distribution, The Olivella saucer bead trade network appears to have collapsed suddenly between A.D. 430 and 1050, and Ohvella saucer bead industry was replaced by more regionally-integrated shell bead forms, such as Olivella wall beads and clamshell disk beads. This change possibly indicates an increased importance of communicating identify, status and cultural affiliation within an increasingly populated region. The manufacture of clamshell disk beads seems to have centered primarily on the Santa Rosa Plain and within the Napa Valley. These type beads were used as exchange currency with a standardized value. The burial practice of cremation was also Introduced in the North Bay during this time (Milliken et al. 2007). These shifts in technology, artifact types and mortuary practices, which for the most part spread throughout the San Francisco Bay Area from north to south, appear to indicate that another upward cycle of regional integration took place during this period; however, this cycle was stopped short by the Contact Period, which is marked by Russian and Spanish settlement within the region.
ETHNOGRAPHIC SETTING
The Project Area lies within the ethnographic territory of the Konhomtara tribelet of the Southern Porno linguistic affiliation (Barrett 1908; Kroeber 1925; Stewart 1943). According to Stewart (1943:53), the
Evans & De Shazo, Inc Page 8 —. a o — in in in n ~ Q n fl 0 0) 0 3 ~ =0 CD CD an o no~=-.~ t 00 fl ~i 0 0 0 fl in 0—CD .-tW Di Di 0 CD CD in in in — -Il ~ atfl2: CD 0 C, O~ CD a >< — CD 2 o ~. •g ‘g -g ~ n~•in=’ — ~‘ — — -r- — ot 0CDEr~.. _.o a- a o ~ ‘~ 0 N * ≤ 0 3’ TJ ~ = U D.C an n~ o -% 3 — ~ p ,~‘ 6~• - t_tintc $-z. a~ ~= ~E 0 00 a — a -‘ in 3
to I,, — = Di Di °-‘o ~ CD 2.° a Sn a -q, =‘ Z ‘< 2 —~ -‘ Di O’D Ow in~~Oifl
at 000 In 000 a -, =- 3~ = 00 00C0 I_I C, ~0 ~ in .-,0 •- — — ~ 0 ~- o3 * CD 0 00 Di 3 ag’g~ 2 ~ r Di o —-‘i I-n inCt CD — 00 0 ~ CD a a Di 0 0 ,~ ~, -< m Di ~ — 0 C -f v-_i =- -‘ ~ 0 0 = t 3 ~ UT Di CO a 0-~ ~ C’ .0 g 0 =~v-_i~• tmanta ef N) = -t -t m~ ~ a ,~ 0) 0 =~ =‘• -‘ • vf~0~CD CD —CD a a g,-~ c C * * in in in CD in — in CD 94 tCD~ Corn Di C =~ 3 ~• in in 300 =Di CD — a c-oW ~ 0 — — l~DC Q~in it’ ~ inçO~ 5~ Z3~ ~ Di 2,8 4J a a 0 — ~- 3. o Di S. -, CD 0 in 2: ~ r- ,— 0- ~ Q Di ~ Di Di CI -+0 in Z —‘— 0000 = W’tt ~‘ ra o—. CD c- a = t0 0 -, CD Di CD—.~ ~n ~a CD0- — — an ~. a ~ — 0 ~ z ~ a CD ç~ CD o ~ !i -< ~z- 0- •< I-n a °‘!! UI z- ~ CD = — * a < o Di Q in — i-to — °- Zr — — — ~- Di Di n in — 0-0_CD o CD 0 CD — toW ~ h -‘C 0) ~ Di~~Ct ~ — * ~ ~ ~n 00-4, in I )~- It = Di Di -. ~ a 0 Di ?t — = Ow —I- ~ in 0 0 — 0 — ~ ~,• -. — a0~0 —Ct r=-Ct CD CD 1’ ‘~Ttin COO tt~Di -. o * in = a -U a ~- ° Di ~ @ o i a- Di On 0* -R—~— an ~ < CD ~ Di * CI r r < * Din0 ~o0O i-f ~- et ‘-0 CD r r ~ ~i in ~. h -I, •t -‘ CD 0, ~ CD Di EVANS DE SHAZO, INC ~>ARCIJAEOIOr.y ,Ir,roh,Ic PI~EsEItvArwN’
Southern Porno built structures using wooden poles tied together at the top and covered with brush and grass, or tule. Large semi-~ubterranean sweathouses and dance houses structures were also constructed within main village sites. The subsistence economy was based on hunting, fishing, and collecting a variety of vegetable resources. Southern Porno groups relied heavily on acorns, which could be gathered and stored. Other plants including buckeye nuts, berries, grasses seeds, roots, bulbs, and edible greens, were also gathered. Food obtained from the coast included dried seaweed and kelp, as well as fish, especially salmon and steelhead, and sea mammals. Large game animals, such as deer, elk, and antelope were important dietary constituents, as well as small game, such as rabbits and squirrels, and many varieties of birds. Trade with neighboring groups was an important way is which they acquired resources that were not locally available, such as marine shell and obsidian. Porno people were also specialists in gaming, and the production of clamshell disk beads and magnesite cylinders (McLendon and Oswalt 1978). Native Americans throughout the Bay Area were significantly affected by the establishment of missions by the Spanish in San Francisco (1776), Santa Clara (1777), and San Jose (1797). As a result, Native Americans throughout the Bay Area were forcibly relocated, converted to Catholicism, and forced to abandon their Native traditions, languages and ceremonies. European-introduced diseases (e.g. measles and smallpox), for which Native Americans had no immunity, sickened populations and lowered birth rates, which led to an overall decline in the Native population. By 1821 Native Americans living on the Santa Rosa Plain began to be baptized and relocated to the newly established missions in San Rafael (1817) and Sonoma (1323), which accelerated the conversion of many Southern Porno and Coast Miwok that resided in the area (Milliken 2008). Beginning in 1333, the missions were “de-secularized,” and Native Americans living at the missions were forced to leave. Many returned to their traditional home and some found work on newly established ranchos as laborers; while others lived in refugee villages. However, during the American period in California (post 1848) a flood of new settlers swallowed up available land for farming and ranching purposes, the Southern Pomo were further displaced, and many were forced onto reservations. It is reported that in 1870 there were only 19 Native Americans living within the Analy Township, which was once home to thousands of Native Americans prior to American period (Thompson 1877:95). By 1908, there were only seven Native Americans reportedly living within Sebastopol that occupied an old village site, and ten others that lived at a site located about one mile east of the town (Barrett 1903:214). Today, there are many Coast Miwok and Southern Porno living within their ancestral territory, and in 2000 members of these tribes merged to form the Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria (FIGR), which is a Federally recognized tribe. Other Federally-recognized tribes in the area include the Lytton Band of Porno Indians and the Dry Creek Rancheria Band of Pomo Indians.
HISTORIC PERIOD SETTING
Russian Settlement of the Sonoma Coast (1812-1842) Russia began their expansion into North America with a massive scientific expedition to Alaska in 1741. The expedition motivated Russian investment in the Alaskan fur trade, and by the nineteenth century the Russian-American Company was actively competing with British and American fur-trading interests as far south as California. As a result, permanent settlements were established along the shores of northern California by the Russians that could supply food and a base for exploiting sea otter
Evans& DeShazo, Inc Page 10 ~, EVANS D~ SHAZO, INC ABCI b’iEOi,OGV II S3Gflft PIti~E~JtV~~TION
populations up and down the coast. In 1812, after exploring the Sonoma Coast, the Russian-American Company selected a place located 18 miles north of Bodega Bay, called Met!ni by the native Kashaya Porno, where they established an administrative center called Fort Ross. Later, a number of smaller Russian settlements were established, including a port at Bodega Bay called Port Rumianstev, a sealing station on the Farallon Islands, and by 1830 three small farming communities located south of Ross, including Kostromitinov located on the Russian River near Willow Creek, Ichlebnikov located one mile north of Bodega Bay in the Salmon Creek valley, and Chernykh located near present-day town of Graton (Schneider 2007; Stewart 1986). The Kostromitinov Ranch was an important way station between Fort Ross and the Russian colony at Bodega Bay and the river essentially acted as a “Russian highway” to the unexplored interior (Bancroft 1886).
The Mexican Period (1821- 1846) In 1821, Mexico won its independence from Spain with the signing of the Treaty of Córdoba and took possession of California, marking the end of the Spanish mission period and the beginning of the rancho period in “Alta California”. Dramatic changes occurred throughout California under Mexican rule due to the lack of strong oversight and military rule imposed by the Spanish, and soon new opportunities arose for trade, as foreign ships that had previously been held off by Spanish guarded military ports were allowed to dock and provide a variety of provisions to local settlers. In 1835, at the direction of Mexican Governor Jose Figueroa, Mariano Guadalupe Vallejo, a famous military commander, politician, and rancher, began construction of the Presidio of Sonoma (Mission Sonoma) to counter the Russian presence at Fort Ross. Vallejo also sent three men, Edward McIntosh, James Black and James Dawson, west to settle the Sebastopol I Valley Ford / Freestone areas to prevent further settlement by the Russians. However, in 1842, the Russian-American Company sold Fort Ross, its outposts and holdings to Captain John Sutter of Sacramento, and left California (Watrous 1998). As with many politically prominent citizens and military leaders that served the Mexican government, Mcintosh, Black and Dawson each applied for and received huge land holdings, called ranchos. In 1839, Dawson and McIntosh planned to jointly apply for the Rancho Estero Americana land grant. When Mcintosh went to Monterey for the necessary papers, he returned with papers made out only in his name, which infuriated Dawson who sawed their residence in half and moved his half onto land that would later become his own land grant, Rancho Canada de Pogolimi. In that same year, the 8,849-acre Rancho Estero Americana was granted to Mcintosh. The Project Area is located in the former Rancho Canada de Jonive that was granted to James Black in 1845. Rancho Canada de Jonive was 10,787-acres and extended from present-day Sebastopol on the east to present-day Freestone on the west. in 1848, Black sold Rancha Canada de Janive to Jasper O’Farrell, and O’Farrell sold Black this land grant called Rancho Nicasio. O’Farrell married Mary McChristian in 1849 and they resided on the Rancho Canada de Jonive until he died in 1875.
Early American Period (1846- 1900) The early American Period in California is marked by the end of the of the Mexican American War when the United States (U.S.) took possession of the territories of California and New Mexico in the signing of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo (1848). The treaty provided the resident Mexicans their American citizenship and guaranteed title to land granted in the Mexican period. Following admission of California into the Union in 1850, the U.S. Congress created the U.S. Land Commission in 1851 to validate the titles
Evans & Be Shazo, Inc Page 11 ~> EVAnS £~ D~ SHAZO INC ~ ARC’ ,AEOIor.v ~._J HI SF011 IC I’ItESIUt&~TION
of Mexican land grants in California and to resolve land ownership disputes. As required by the Land Act of 1851, a claim for Rancha Canada de Jonive was filed with the Public Land Commission in 1852, and the grant was patented to Jasper O’Farrell in 1858 (Munro-Fraser 1880). The discovery of gold in California in 1848, as well as excellent soil and abundant water, drew numerous American settlers to the area from all over, and soon squatters began to take over land held by former Mexican citizens. The Homestead Act, signed into law by President Abraham Lincoln in 1862 further encouraged settlers to move west by providing them with 160-acres (‘/. of a Section) of public land in exchange for a small filing fee and a commitment to occupy and “improve the land for a period of five years. The Public Lands Survey System (P155) that was established by the Land Ordinance of 1785 was utilized to subdivide public-owned land into 6-mile square Townships that were then subdivided into 36 one-mile square Sections made available to citizens to own. Some of the earliest American settlers to arrive in Sebastopol included Otis Allen, James Delaney, M. Gillian, James M. Miller, John Walker, and Orlando Sowers who also settled in 1850. In 1855, J. H. P. Morris took up a claim for 120-acres of land within present-day Sebastopol, which he called Pine Grove. Morris came to Sonoma in 1853 and was in business for a while with James A. Miller and John Walker before filing his land claim and moving a building from Miller and Walker’s property to his claim in Sebastopol where he opened a grocery store and saloon (Munro-Fraser 1880:175). Morris offered lots for free to anyone who would start a business, including John Dougherty who was given a plot of land under the condition he open a store (Mcclure 1995:9; Thompson 1877:23). George H. Jacobs then opened a blacksmith and wagon-making shop and Captain Auser erected a hotel. Other businesses soon followed, and Sebastopol quickly grew because the fertile and well-irrigated soil prompted settlement and steady growth (Munro-Fraser 1880:176). The name Pine Grove was later changed to Sebastopol in 1859 when an official post office was established and it was found that a town called Pine Grove, California already existed (Gudde 1998:354). In 1269 William J. Hunt, who traveled by ox-team six years earlier from Jefferson County, Missouri, planted several Gravenstein apple trees on a small orchard farm he owned located northwest of Sebastopol where he built a dehydrator. it was there that Hunt developed a process for dehydrating apples and established the Hunt Brother’s Fruit Company. In 1883 Nathaniel Griffith purchased 85 acres in the Gold Ridge District and planted the first commercial orchard of Gravenstein apple trees with the help of Luther Burbank, who himself purchased farm and planted 1,800 trees (WSCHS 2003). During this time, Sebastopol experienced continuous growth as more and more apple orchards, vineyards, berries and hops were planted and sold successfully in the local markets.
Late American Period (post 1900) By 1902 Sebastopol was incorporated and consisted of schools, churches, hotels, canneries, mills, lumber yards, wineries, and an opera house. By 1911, Sebastopol had a population of 2,000 (Peterson and Peterson 1981). The 1906 earthquake reduced many of the early buildings in Sebastopol to rubble, but like many of the towns affect by the earthquake, the town was quickly rebuilt. The apple industry in particular flourished as the commercial potential of the Gravenstein apple was realized and the industry supported steady growth throughout the Sebastopol and Graton areas. The berry industry was also important and in the early years was as profitable as the apple industry. It was common for farmers to plant berries between the rows of young orchards and by 1920 some 360
Evans & Dc Shaza, Inc Page 12 ~, EVANS D~ SHAZO, INC ‘\ItCIJ;~EOWGV I ~to,, IC I’RESET~ V:\TION
farmers grew berries around Sebastopol with a production of about 3,200 tons that were canned or shipped. Blackberries and Logan berries were the principle types grown (Western Sonoma County Historical Society 2003:30).
When the Northwestern Pacific Railroad was extended to Sebastopol around the turn of the century the farms were put in touch with distant as well as local markets, and by 1904 the Petaluma and Santa Rosa electric railroad (P&SR) reached Sebastopol, which also offered passenger service. In the early 1900s prominent citizens of Sonoma County that included Petaluma grain dealer Frank P. McNear, Santa Rosa banker Frank A. Brush, and Spreckels Sugar Corporation head Rudolph Spreckels, determined the need for the region to construct an electric railroad to support the developing fruit and poultry industries in the area that would directly link Petaluma, Santa Rosa, Sebastopol, Graton, and Forestville. In 1903, with one million dollars in capital stock, the P&SR was contracted to build 32 miles of electric tracks that linked Petaluma, Santa Rosa, Sebastopol, Graton, and Forestville (McGraw 1909). Sebastopol’s fruit industry was boasted significantly by the arrival of the railroads because it was the first mode of transportation that offered over-night freight service from Sebastopol to San Francisco and beyond. From Sebastopol, the cars of the P&SR traveled to the dock in Petaluma where freight was unloaded onto one of two steamer boats that traveled down the Petaluma River and across the bay to San Francisco. That year alone the Gold Ridge district shipped out ten cars of fresh fruit on the P&SR (Toumey 1926).
The coming of the railroads created an economically viable industry in Sebastopol and apple processing became a multi-million-dollar business in the years before World War II (LeBaron and Mitchell 1993:90) with 1936 being the peak apple production year (WSCHS 2003:20). In 1920, Sonoma County had more than 11,000 acres in apple production with all varietals represented. In 1924, two thousand train carloads of fresh and dried fruit were shipped (Tuomey 1926). Apple plants and dehydrators popped up all over as families like R.E. Oehlmann, founder of Manzana Products, Hallberg, Frei Brothers, Will Hotle, O’connell, Barlow and Silveira became well known in the region, all of them growers as well as processors. Owners of smaller orchards sold to the Sebastopol Apple Growers Union (Meagher 2010). At the peak there were approximately fifteen apple processors (individuals and cooperatives) operating in the area and 80 dehydrators, many of which were owned and operated by members of the local Chinese and Japanese communities (WSCHS 2003:21). The apple industry slowly declined, and by 1958 there were 40 apple processors in Sonoma County and only 5,449 acres of Gravenstein apples. Today there is only one producer in Sebastopol and less than 1,000 acres of Gravenstein apples in production (Meagher 2010).
HISTORY OF LUTHER BURBANK AND GOLD RIDGE FARM
Luther Burbank was born on a farm near Lancaster Massachusetts on March 7, 1849, where from a very young age he was interested in nature and mechanics. Burbank attended a local district school until he was fifteen years old and then spent four winters at the Lancaster Academy, but he did not attend college. During this time, Burbank’s keen interest in learning about nature was encouraged by his uncle, who headed a department at a Boston museum, and by his uncle’s friend, Swiss-American naturalist Louis Agassiz (WSCHS 2017). Burbank also spent a great deal of time in local libraries and was greatly influenced by the work of Charles Darwin and his research published in the book Variation of Animals and Plants Under Domestication, which led to Luther’s ongoing experiments with plant propagation (WSC[-IS 2017). Burbank’s father, Samuel Burbank, died in 1868 and the family moved to nearby Groton,
Evans& Deshazo, Inc Page 13 EVANS D~ SHAZO, INC ,uwIIAEoInr.v IlISRIIUC pRI:srn’c~TIoN
Massachusetts. At the age of twenty-one, Burbank used the inheritance from his father to help purchase 17-acres of land in nearby Lunenburg where he set-up a market garden business, which also allowed him the opportunity to continue to pursue his passion to conduct plant experiments that included crossbreeding and hybridization (Dreyer 1975). During this time, Luther discovered a superior type of potato that he called the Burbank Potato that grew quickly and was disease resistant. The Burbank Potato is considered the parent of the most widely grown potato in the United States today, known as the Russet Potato (Luther Burbank Home & Gardens 2017). In 1875, at the age of 26, Burbank left Massachusetts for California. He arrived in San Francisco via the transcontinental railway and immediately set out for the City of Santa Rosa. In 1877 his mother Olive and his sister Emma joined him in Santa Rosa. Rose purchased 4-acres on Tupper and Park Streets. That same year, Luther rented 2.8 acres of his mothers property and started the Santa Rosa Nursery. By 1881, Burbank purchased the 2.8-acre property from his mother (Historic American Buildings Survey, nd). By 1884, Burbank’s Santa Rosa Nursery was very prosperous and he purchased 4-acres of land near downtown Santa Rosa, where he built a house, planted a garden, and constructed a green house, known today as Luther Burbank’s Home and Garden (Luther Burbank Home & Gardens 2017). However, Burbank’s passion for experimentation required more land, and by 1885 he purchased nearly 18-acres in Sebastopol known as the Gold Ridge Farm from Chalmer A. and Clara S. Bonham for use as his experimental farm (Figure 5). Burbank stated that in Sebastopol “the conditions were more favorable for the growing of some types of plants” (Burbank et al. 1914).
.,~, ..t 4’ 4~)~4.
Figure 5. Photo ca. 1.900 taken at Gold Ridge Farm, showing the original house and barn.
Evans & De Shozo, Inc Page 14 EVANS DE SHAz0, INC ,>?~ IftHA rotnov (ç3 ii ISlOIl IC RESP.RVA1ION
It was at the Gold Ridge Farm where Burbank conducted the bulk of his research, and although Burbank’s home remained in Santa Rosa, he made the trip to Sebastopol by buggy or bicycle several times a week, often staying in the small cottage on the property. Burbank planted over 2-acres of lilies, watsonias, roses, gladioli, hawthorns, bottlebrushes, morning glories, poppies and sweet peas, and his daisies, in rows 700 feet long at his farm in Sebastopol. Plants from all over the world were sent to Burbank’s Gold Ridge Farm for crossing, testing, and selecting (Dreyer 1975). The experimentation that resulted in the creation of the Shasta daisy, an experiment that spanned seventeen years and involved hundreds of selections from hybrid seedlings of four species of Chrysanthemum, was largely carried out at the Gold Ridge Farm in Sebastopol where there was sufficient space for the many seedlings. The Shasta daisy, which is still popular today, was considered a new race of daisies, although the details of its ancestry are now uncertain. In 1901, the first Shasta daisies were offered for sale, and in 1904, Burbank introduced three different kinds of daisies, which he named ‘California’, ‘Westralia’ and ‘Alaska’.
By the early twentieth century, Burbank had become a nationally recognized public figure and had attracted the attention of many of the world’s scientific minds due to his significant contributions to horticulture. In his time, Luther Burbank was as famous as his friends Thomas Edison and Henry Ford (Figure 6) (WSCHS 1978).
Figure 6: Luther Burbank (right) with Thomas Edison (left) (WSCHS 2017).
Because of his popularity, he spent less time in Santa Rosa, and more time at Gold Ridge Farm where he conducted most of his fruit and nut experiments, as well as a significant number of ornamental trials. Gold Ridge Farm was a place “where the press and public (at least at first) could not disturb him, and where he had room to raise, for example, five hundred varieties of peach alone, as well as many rows
Evans & De Shazo, Inc Page iS EVANS DE SHAZO, INC ~ AI,rlcAr.oLor.y fs3 ETIS1OkIC’
of Shasta Daisy seedlings, each 700 ft. long” (WSCHS 1978). In 1914, to help maintain his privacy and concentrate on his work, Burbank’s seed catalog requested that before visitors came to the Gold Ridge Farm that they needed to fill out an application that contained such questions as “for whose benefit is this interview?” (WSCHS 1978). In addition, to further reduce the number of visitors at Gold Ridge Farm, Burbank charged his guests for time spent on the farm. A 1910 appointment card, on display at the ca. 1910 cottage, details the fees as “$10 for an hour’s visit, $5 for half an hour, and $2.50 for 15 minutes” (WSCHS 1978). The appointment card further explains, “The burden of entertaining the multitude has become so great that the experimental work has been seriously crippled and must be wholly discontinued unless visitors are greatly reduced.”
In 1923, at age seventy-four, Burbank sold 3-acres of the Sebastopol Farm to the local cemetery association. Burbank died in 1926, and in 1927, Mrs. Burbank, who was only thirty-seven years old, announced that Stark Brothers Nurseries and Orchards Company of Missouri would be taking over the operation of the Gold Ridge Farm. The Stark Brothers leased approximately 10-acres of the property in 1927, except for the 3-acres that is part of the NRHP designation. The final lease of the Gold Ridge Farm by the Stark Brothers ended in 1957. From 1957 until 1973, the 3-acres around the ca. 1910 Cottage remained relatively undisturbed, except for some maintenance that was taking place on the adjacent 12-acre apple orchard that Mrs. Burbank had planted. During this period, some of the original Burbank plants growing within the 3-acres continued to thrive.
In 1973, the entire 15-acre Gold Ridge Farm was purchased by the Sebastopol Area Housing Corporation for a senior citizen housing development. Mrs. Burbank sold the property under the condition that the 3-acre portion of the 15-acre property remain undisturbed, which included the ca. 1910 cottage and any remaining plants and trees originally planted by Burbank. On August 20, 1973, as part of a condition of approval for development of the senior housing project, the 3-acre Gold Ridge Farm was added to the Sebastopol city limits. In 1975 the senior housing development project was completed within a portion of the original Gold Ridge Farm, and due to concerns about the future preservation and use of the 3- acre property, the WSCHS was formed. By 1980, the WSCHS appeared before the Sebastopol Planning Commission due to the lack of action by the Sebastopol Area Housing Corporation to preserve and restore the 3-acre property, as required under their Use Permit and the Master Plan for Rehabilitation developed by the City of Sebastopol that stated, “it is of considerable importance to restore the house on the property as soon as possible. Delay will result in considerable damage to the floor and its supports which may in turn further damage sills and wall studs” (WSCHS 1978). The City determined that although there was an agreement, the Sebastopol Area Housing Corporation was not technically in violation of their Use Permit. During this time, the Sebastopol Area Housing Corporation determined it was in their best interest to sell the 3-acre property. In 1986, the Housing Corporation Board, agreed to donate the property to the City of Sebastopol.
METHODS USED TO ~DENflFY ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
In accordance with CEQA, to identify the presence or absence of potentially significant archaeological resources within the Project Area the following methods were utilized: a record search and review, a Native American Sacred Sites inventory, and a field survey. The methods used to complete each of these tasks are described below.
Evans& Deshazo, Inc Page 16 ~, EVANS(~3DE SHAZO, INC - ~ ARLI I ,‘EOT.OGV I Ii$~ouIc PRI:SI~II V:~TON
RECORD SEARCH AND REVIEW
A record search and review of the Project Area was conducted to 1) determine if there are any other previously recorded cultural resources located within the Project Area besides those associated with Gold Ridge Farm, 2) to assess the potential for archaeological resources, including buried archaeological resources, to be present within the Project Area, and 3) to understand the types of archaeological resources that might be encountered within the Project Area.
The record search included a review of information on file at the Northwest Information Center (NWIC) of the California Historical Resources Information Systems (CHRIS)2, a review of the Office of Historic Preservation (OHP) Directory of Properties in the Historic Property Data File for Sebastopol, Sonoma County (dated 4/5/2012) that includes resources listed on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR), the California inventory of Historic Resources, California Historical Landmarks, and California Points of Historical Interest, a review of appropriate historic and prehistoric references to provide background information on the prehistory and history of the Project Area, a review of historic maps dating from 1857 to 1954, and a review of geologic and soil data to identify the potential for buried archaeological resources to be present within the Project Area.
NATIVE AMERICAN SACRED SITES INVENTORY AND CONSULTATION
A Sacred Sites inventory and consultation with local Native American tribes was also conducted, The purpose of the Sacred Sites inventory and consultation with local Native American tribes is to determine if there are any Native American Sacred Sites or Tribal Cultural Resources located within or near the Project Area that could be impacted by the proposed Project.
FIELD SURVEY
EDS Principal Archaeologist, Sally Evans, M.A., RPA conducted a pedestrian field survey of the Project Area to identify and record any archaeological resources within the Project Area. The field strategy included an on-foot visual inspection of 100 percent of the Project Area by conducting parallel transect spaced two meters apart. The surveyor inspected the Project Area for all evidence of past occupation, including prehistoric artifacts, such as chipped stone (obsidian and chert) flakes and tools (such as projectile points, knives, and scrapers), shellfish remains, ground stone, and fire-affected rock, as well as evidence of historic-era artifacts.
RESULTS OF ARCHAEOLOGACAL STUDY
This section of the report provides the results of the archaeological resource study that included a Record Search and Review, Sacred Sites Inventory and Native American Consultation, and Field Survey.
2 The cost of the record search was donated by the NwIc as a courtesy to the W5CH5.
Evans&DeShazo, Inc Page 17 EVANS (53DE SnAzo, INC IC I I’~F (11001 ICISi Oil IC PIll SF IIV,~ rro(
RESULTS OF RECORD SEARCH AND REVIEW
NWIC Record Search
The record search conducted at the NWIC (File #17-0069) on July 17, 2017 revealed that the Project Area has not previously been surveyed for archaeological resources. However, according to information on file at the NWIC, there have been only been two cultural resource studies previously conducted within a 1/4-mile of the Project Area, which are listed in Table 1. Study 5-2615 that was conducted by Thomas King on a volunteer basis included an archaeological survey of the adjacent 14-acres that was part of the 150-unit senior housing project, “Burbank Gardens” No archaeological resources were observed within the 14-acre property.
Tablet: Previous Cultural Resource Studies Conducted within a 1/4-Mile of the Project Area.
NWIC II Year Title Author(s) Results
2615 1973 An Archaeological Impact Evaluation of Two Housing Thomas F King Negative Development Projects in the City of Sebastopol, Sonoma county, California 38337 2011 A Cultural Resources Survey of the Parcel at 500 Vicki Beard Negative Robinson Road, Sebastopol, Sonoma County, California.
According to information on file at the NWIC, there is one Primary resources recorded within a 1/4-mile of the Project Area. This includes CA-SON-721 (P-49-000663), a prehistoric Native American site located ‘4-mile southwest of the Project Area that was described as an obsidian workshop location containing artifacts such as obsidian, chert, and glass debitage. Two domestic dogs (Cams famiiaris) and one domestic cat (Fe!is dornesticus) burial were also identified within the site (Del Cioppo 1973) The presence of glass debitage suggest the site was occupied by Native Americans in the historic period
A check of the OHP’s Directory of Properties in the Historic Property Data File for Sebastopol, Sonoma County (dated 4/5/2012) lists several built-environment resources in Sebastopol, including the 1890 Gold Ridge Farm, which has a National Register status code of is, meaning that it is listed individually on the NRHP and the CRHR (OHP 2012). The Gold Ridge Farm property (NRHP #78000803) was nominated to the National Register in 1978 by the WSCHS.
Historic Map Research
A review of historic maps and information was conducted to reveal past activities within the Project Area that can indicate the potential for historic-era archaeological sites to be present. The following maps were reviewed:
o 1857 Plat of the Rancho Canada Deionive
o 1867 Map of Sonoma County, California Made and published by A B. Bowers
o 1877 Map of Sonoma County, California. Made and published by Thos. H. Thompson
o 1898 Illustrated Atlas of Sonoma County California. Reynolds & Proctor, Santa Rosa.
Evans & De Shazo, Inc Page 18 EVANS~3DE SRAZ0, INC I ,~EOLOGV II ISIT~ IC PRESEIt\’,~TTON
o 1900 Official Map of Sonoma County, California. Compiled from the official maps in the County Assessor’s Office, with Additions and Corrections to June ~ 1900. By L.E. Ricksecker, City Engineer of Santa Rosa and Ex-County Surveyor, and W.B. Walkup, Publisher.
o 1908 Official Map of the County of Sonoma, California Compiled and Drawn from the Official records by Mclntire and Lewis.
o 1942 USGS 15-minute Sebastopol topographic map
o 1942 Department of War aerials for central Sonoma County
o 1954 USGS 7.5-minute Sebastopol quadrangle map
In the Mexican period, the Project Area was within the Canada de Jonive rancho granted to James Black in 1845, who sold the rancho to Jasper O’Farrell in 1948. O’Farrell resided on the Rancho Canada de Jonive until he died in 1875. During this time rancho land was divided up and sold to newly arriving settlers. According to the 1877 Historic Atlas of Sonoma County (Thompson 1877), by 1877, the 3-acre Gold Ridge Farm property was part of a 200-acre parcel owned by John Walker and two adjacent cemeteries, the Free Masons and Odd Fellow Cemetery and the Catholic Cemetery, were situated along Bodega Avenue between Walker’s property and present-day Pleasant Hill Road. Walker moved from Missouri to California in 1841, then to Sebastopol in 1850 where he was one of the town’s first American settlers. Walker eventually came to own 4,000 acres in the Sebastopol area that he farmed (Munro Fraser 1880:170-172).
By 1885, Walker’s property was subdivided, and Luther Burbank had purchased an 18-acre portion that included the 3-acre Gold Ridge Farm. The 1898, 1900, and 1908 maps (Mclntire and Lewis 1908; Reynolds and Proctor 1898; Ricksecker and Walkup 1900) list Luther Burbank as owner of the property but do not indicate the presence of any buildings within the 3-acre Gold Ridge Farm. Likewise, neither the 1942 or 1954 USGS maps indicate the presence of buildings within the 3-acre Gold Ridge Farm; however, the 1954 map indicates the presence of a large orchard that was part of Burbank’s original 18- acres, which is also shown on the 1942 aerial map (Figure 7). The 1942 aerial map also depicts the ca. 1910 cottage within the 3-acre Gold Ridge Farm and other buildings within the greater Luther Burbank property.
Evans & Deshaza, Inc Page 19 • EVANS 8,DE SHAZO, INC AurnAroLor.y IIISTORW PRESttRV:~Tk)N
Legend 3-Acre Gold Ridge Farm
0 50 l0~ 200 Feet I I I I
Figure 7: 1942 Department of War aerials for central Sonoma CountV showing the location of the 3-acre Gold Ridge Farm and the surrounding orchard within the former 18-acre Luther Burbank Farm.
Evans & De Shazo, Inc Page 20 / ~, EVANS £q D~ SHAZO, INC MtC~ I,’EOTOflV l.._) Filsiocuc pxI~smtv:vrloN
Review of Geology and Soils The Geologic Map of Sonoma County (California Department of Conservation 2008) shows that the geology underlying the 3-acre Gold Ridge Farm is made up of sedimentary rocks that are Pliocene and early Miocene in age. These sedimentary rocks are associated with the Wilson Grove (formerly Merced) Formation that is characterized by well-sorted, white to buff or gray, fine-grained sandstone (Bedrossian 1981:19; Travis 1952). The Soil Survey of Sonoma County (Miller 1972; USDA 2017) shows that the soils consist of Goldridge fine sandy loam, 2 to9 percent slopes and 15 to 30 percent slopes. Goldridge series consists of deep and very deep, moderately well drained soils formed in material weathered from weakly consolidated sandstone. Goldridge soils are found on rolling uplands with slopes of 2 to 50 percent. In a typical profile, Goldridge soil includes an A horizon consisting of 24-inches of fine sandy loam followed by a B horizon of sandy clay loam from 24 to 72 inches.
RESULTS OF SACRED SITES INVENTORY AND NATIVE AMERICAN CONSULTATION
On July 10, 2017, a letter and project location map were sent to the NAHC to request a Sacred Sites inventory of the Project Area. The results of the Sacred Sites inventory were received by the NAHC on July 26, 2017 with negative results. However, the results letter (Souza 2017) states that “the absence of specific site information in the Sacred Lands File does not indicate the absence of Native American cultural resources” (Souza 2017). The NAHC provided a list of Native American individuals and tribes to contact for further information. Five tribes were listed: The Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria (FIGR), Lytton Rancheria of California, Kashia Band of Porno Indians of the Stewarts Point Middletown Rancheria, and the Mishewal-Wappo Tribe of Alexander Valley. FIGR is represented by Chairperson Greg Sarris and FIGR tribal member Gene Buvelot; Lytton Rancheria of California is represented by Chairperson Marjorie Mejia; Kashia Band of Porno Indians of the Stewarts Point is represented by Chairperson Reno Keoni Franklin; Middletown Rancheria is represented by Chairperson Jose Simon III; and Mishewal-Wappo Tribe of Alexander Valley is represented by Chairperson Scoff Gabaldon. Each of these individuals was contacted via USPS on July 31, 2017. The following responses have been received.
a On August 4, 2017, Stephanie L. Reyes, Tribal Historic Preservation Officer (THPO) for Middletown Rancheria responded stating that “though we have no specific comments at this time, should any new information or evidence of human habitation be found as the project progresses, we request that ail work cease and that you contact us immediately” (Reyes 2017).
On August 4, 2017, Buffy McQuillen, THPO for FIGR responded via email stating, “Thank you for your outreach and request for identffication of cultural resources from the Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria. The project area identified in your correspondence is with the Tribe’s ancestral territory and there may be tribal cultural resource impacts. Please provide the Tribe with the results of your research efforts and recommendations” (McQuillen 2017).
o On September 5, 2017, EDS sent the draft Archaeological Study report via electronic mail to Ms. McQuillen for review and comment.
o As of the date of this report (February 16, 2018), no additional comments have been received from FIGR.
On August 14, 2017, Lorin W. Smith, Jr., THPO for the Kashia Band of Porno Indians of the Stewarts Point, responded via email stating, “The Proposed Project at 7777 Bodega Avenue,
Evans & Deshozo, Inc Page 21 4, EVANS DE SHAZO, INC ~~“AI~CII$EOI.OOV ITTWIVI~IC PItEsI:Itv,vrrc,N
Sebastopol, CA. is out of the Aboriginal territory of the Stewarts Point Rancheria Kashia Band of Porno Indians. We do not have any concerns or comrnents at this time” (Smith 2017).
No additional comments have been received as of the date of this report (February 16, 2018). All correspondence with the NAHC and the local Native American tribes pertaining to the proposed Project is included in Attachment A.
RESULTS OF FIELD SURVEY
A field survey of the entire 3-acre Gold Ridge Farm property was conducted by Sally Evans, M.A., RPA on August 18, 2017. The property was surveyed by walking east/west oriented transects spaced approximately 10 meters apart from the north to the south end of the property. During the survey, particular attention was paid to the proposed Project Area that includes the proposed restroom building location and the foot path leading from the existing parking lot to the proposed new restroom building.
Vegetation throughout the property consist of a variety of non-native grasses and forbs, as well as a large variety of fruit and nut trees. The ground visibility throughout the parcel was good, approximately 50%. The soil was most visible in and along the foot paths that meander through the property, and within the spoils created by ground-burrowing rodents. The proposed Project Area was heavily vegetated, and the ground surface was covered with a layer of detritus, which reduced the soil visibility to approximately 10%. Within the proposed Project Area, a hand trowel was used to push away the detritus to inspect the underlying soil.
No prehistoric or historic-era artifacts were observed within the property, or within the proposed Project Area.
Evans & Be Shazo, Inc Page 22 IWITAEOTOGVEVANS&30EI II~IflIISHAZO,It pI{I:sER~,nrc’wi~c
Figure 8: Overview of Gold Ridge Farm property, facing south.
Evans & De Shozo, Inc Page 23 ~4’AF~cflAEotoovEVANS HISTOTUCDE SHAZO,pIu:SHtVATrONINC
CONCLUSIONS
In accordance with CEQA regulations and guidelines, EDS conducted an Archaeological Study to determine if there are archaeological resources present that could be impacted by the proposed Project. The Archaeological Study included a record search and review, a Native American Sacred Sites inventory, consultation with local Native American tribes, and a field survey that were of the 3-acre Gold Ridge Farm property completed by EDS Principal Archaeologist, Sally Evans, M.A., RPA, who exceeds the Secretary of Interior’s qualification standards in Archaeology and has over 17 years of professional experience in California archaeology and Cultural Resource Management.
The following is a summary of findings:
o The record search did not identify the presence of any archaeological resources within or immediately adjacent to the Project Area.
o The Sacred Sites inventory conducted by the NANC did not identify the presence of a Native American Sacred Site within the Project Area (Souza 2017).
o Of the four local Native American tribes contacted, the Kashia Band of Porno Indians of the Stewarts Point and Middletown Rancheria do not have any information or comment regarding the proposed Project. FIGR has expressed concern that there may be tribal cultural resource impacts and requested the opportunity to review and comment on the Archaeological Study and recommendations for the project (Mcuuillen 2017). FIGR was provided with a copy of the draft report on September 5, 2017 for review and comment; however, no additional comments or recommendations have been received from 19CR. Lytton Rancheria of California has not yet responded.
o The review of historic maps for the Project Area determined that the Project Area has a moderate potential to contain historic-era archaeological resources since it was part of Luther Burbank’s 18-acre Gold Ridge Farm since 1885.
o The review of geologic and soils data revealed that Project Area has a low potential to contain buried prehistoric resources due to the presence Pliocene and early Miocene sedimentary deposits that pre-date human occupation, and soil that formed over a long period of time with no buried A horizons noted.
o The field survey did not result in the identification of any archaeological resources.
In conclusion, the Archaeological Study did not result in the identification of any archaeological sites within the Project Area. Therefore, no impacts to archaeological resources is expected to occur as a result of the proposed Project. However, FIGR as requested an opportunity to review the results of the study and may provide specific recommendations for the Project.
Due to the lack of archaeological resources identified, EDS has no project-specific recommendations; however, general recommendations are provided below should archaeological resources be discovered during earth-moving activities associated with the proposed Project.
Evans & De Shazo, inc Page 24 4t~‘IllE~VAN~II’ roI.or~ &3 II1%IDEGill’ FlU Si IG I II)%
RECOMMENDATOONS
The following general recommendations are provided in the event that archaeological resources are discovered within the Project Area during earth-disturbing activities associated with construction of the proposed restroom facility within the 3-acre Gold Ridge Farm.
It is recommended that if any prehistoric or historic-period material is encountered by equipment operators during ground-disturbing activities, or other individuals working within the Project Area, that work be halted in the immediate vicinity of the discovery area until a qualified archaeologist is retained to inspect the material and provide further recommendations for appropriate treatment of the resource pursuant to CEQA regulations and guidelines. It is also recommended that if a prehistoric resource is encountered that the local Native American Tribes, specifically FIGR and Lytton Rancheria of California are immediately notified.
Historic-period resources potentially include all by-products of human land use greater than 50 years of age, including alignments of stone or brick, foundation elements from previous structures, minor earthworks, brick features, surface scatters of farming or domestic type material, and subsurface deposits of domestic type material (e.g., glass, ceramic, metal, etc.).
Prehistoric artifacts that are typically found associated with sites in the area include humanly modified stone (chert, obsidian, basalt flakes and tools), shell, bone or other materials such as charcoal, ash and burned rock that can be indicative of food procurement or processing activities.
Although unlikely, if human remains are encountered within the Project Area during construction, all work must stop in the immediate vicinity of the discovered remains and the County Coroner must be notified immediately. if the remains are suspected to be those of a prehistoric Native American, then the NAHC must be contacted by the Coroner so that a Most Likely Descendant (MLD) can be designated to provide further recommendations regarding treatment of the remains. An archaeologist should also be retained to evaluate the historical significance of the discovery, the potential for additional remains to be present, and to provide further recommendations for treatment of the resource following CEQA regulations and guidelines.
Evans & De Shazo, Inc Page 25 Ad’ EVANS DE SHAZO, !NC Will ~IOl41( lll¼rOllI( I 1IlSFII\ ~Un~3
REFERENCES CITED
Barrett, S. A. 1908 The Ethno-geography of the Porno and Neighboring Indians. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 6 (1): 1-332, Berkeley. Bedrossian, Trinda L. 1981 Geology and Slope Stability of the West Sebastopol Study Area, Sonoma County, California. California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology in Cooperation with the Sonorna County Planning Department. Bower, A.B. 1867 Map of Sonoma County, California. Made and published by A.B, Bowers in accordance with an Act of the Legislature, approved 28 March 1863 with additions and corrections to September First 1867. Burbank, Luther, John Whitson, Robert John, and Henry Smith Williams 1914 Luther Burbank, his methods and discoveries and their practical application. Luther Burbank Press, New York. California Department of Conservation 2008 California Geological Survey map of USGS 7.5-minute Sebastopol quadrangle. Electronic document, ftp://ftp.consrv.ca.gov/pub/dmg/rgmp/Prelimgeopdf/sebastopolprelim.pdf. Accessed August 15, Dreyer, Peter 1975 Gardener Touched with Genius; the Life of Luther Burbank. Coward, New York. Fredrickson, D. A. 1973 Early cultures of the North Coat Ranges, California. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Davis. 1974 Cultural diversity in early central California: A view from the North Coast Ranges. The Journal of California Archaeology 1(1): 41-54. 1989 Prehistory of the Laguna: An Overview. Unpublished report on file at the Northwest Information Center, Rohnert Park, California. Gudde, Erwin 1998 California Place Names: the Origin and Etymology of Current Geographical Names. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA. Jones, T. L., and J. Hayes 1989 Archaeological Data Recovery at CA-Son-120, Sonoma County, California. Environmental Research Branch, California Department of Transportation, Oakland. Unpublished report on file at the Northwest Information Center, Rohnert Park, California. 1993 Problems and Prospects in Sonoma County Archaeology. In, There Grows a Green Tree: Papers in Honor of DavidA. Fredrickson, edited by G. White, P. Mikkelsen, W. R. Hildebrandt, and M. E. Basgall, pp. 197- 216. Center for Archaeological Research at Davis Publication no. 11. University of California, Davis. Historic American Buildings Survey nd. Gold Ridge Farm, 7777 Badega Avenue, Sebastopol, Sonoma County, CA. California Sebastopol Sonoma County. Documentation Compiled After 1933. Retrieved from the Library of Congress, https://www.loc.gov/item/ca1438/, Accessed August 15, 2017. Kunkel, Peter 1962 Yokut and Porno Political Institutions: A Comparative Analysis. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
Evans & De Show, Inc Page 26 EVANS D~ SHAZO, INC ,~EOT.O’;V I IIWroIN~ I’IIESER VAIIO~
Kroeber, Alfred 1925 Handbook of the Indians of California. Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 78, Smithsonian Institution, Washington D.C. LeBaron, Gaye, and ioann Mitchell 1993 Santa Rosa, A Twentieth Century Town. Historia Ltd. Santa Rosa. Luther Burbank Home & Gardens 2017 Burbank Potato: Burbank’s Own Story of How He Developed the Burbank Potato. Electronic document, http://www.lutherburbank.org/about-us/Iuther-burbank/burbank-potato. Accessed August 8, 2017. McClure, Evelyn S. 1995 Sebastopol, California History, Homes & People, 1855-1920. Belle View Press, Sebastopol, CA. McGraw Publishing Company 1909 McGraw Electric Railway Manual, Volume 16. McLendon, Sally and Robert L. Oswalt 1978 Porno: Introduction. In Handbook of North American Indians, William Sturtevant (editor), Volume 8, California, Robert F. Heizer (volume editor), pp. 274-288. Smithsonian Institution, Washington. Mclntire and Lewis 1908 Official Map of the County of Sonoma, California Compiled and Drawn from the Official Records by Mclntire and Lewis. California Map Collection, Sacramento, CA. Meyer, Jack and Jeffrey Rosenthal 2007 Geoarchaeological Overview of the Nine Bay Area Counties in Caltrans District 4. Report on file at the Northwest Information Center, Rohnert Park, California under 5-33600. Miller, Vernon 1972 Soil Survey of Sonoma County, California. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service and Soil Conservation Service. Milliken, Randall 2008 Mission Period Ethnohistory. In “The Creekside Village Archaeological Testing Program) Santa Rosa, Sonoma County) California Archaeological Investigations at the Carrillo Adobe Site (SON-41-Ij, to Fulfill the Requirements of the Creekside Village Condominiums and Senior Apartments Project Revised Mitigation Monitoring Program” by William Roop et. al. (ABS 05-056). Unpublished report on file at the Northwest Information Center, Rohnert Park, California. Milliken, Randall and Richard T. Fitzgerald, Mark C. Hylkema, Randy Groza, Tom Origer, David C. Bieling, Alan Leventhal, Randy S. Wiberg, Andrew Gottsfield, Donna Gillette, Viviana Bellifemine, Eric Strother, Robert Cattier and David A. Fredrickson 2007 Punctuated Cultural Change in the San Francisco Bay Area. In California Prehistory, edited by Terry L. Jones and Kathryn A. KIar, pp. 99-123. AltaMira Press, a Division of Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. New York. Moratto, Michael 1984 California Archaeology. Academic Press, Inc., Orlando, Florida. Munro-Fraser, i. P. 1880 History of Sonoma County. Alley, Bowen & Co., Publishers, San Francisco, CA. Office of Historic Preservation 2012 Directory of Properties in the Historic Property Data File for Sebastopol, Sonoma County, dated 4/5/2012. On file at the Northwest Information Center, Rohnert Park, California. Peterson, Dan, and Geraldine Peterson
Evans & Dc Shazo, Inc Page 27 EVANS D~ SHAZO, INC V ,\ RCflAEOIOCY El Isroluc l’RESEIt~’A’lloN
1981 Final Report Western Sonorna County Historic Resource Inventory. Report on file at the Western Sonoma County Historical Society, Sebastopol, California and at the Northwest Information Center, Rohnert Park, California. Praetzellis, Adrian and Mary Praetzellis 1977 An Archaeo-Environmental Synthesis: the Konhomtara Pomo. Unpublished report on file at the Northwest Information Center, Rohnert Park, California under S-00658. Reynolds and Proctor 1898 Illustrated Atlas of Sonoma County California. Reynolds & Proctor, Santa Rosa. Republished by Windmill Publications, Inc. Mt. Vernon, IN, 1998. Ricksecker, L.E. and W.B. Walkup 1900 official Map of Sonoma County, California. Compiled from the official maps in the County Assessor’s Office, with Additions and Corrections to June Vt 1900. By L.E. Ricksecker, City Engineer of Santa Rosa and Ex-County Surveyor, and W.B. Walkup, Publisher. Approved and declared to be the official map of Sonoma County by resolution of the Board of Supervisors, September 7, 1900. Copywrite Sept. 1900 by W.B. Walkup. Scale: one mile to one inch. Souza, Sharaya 2017 Results of Sacred Lands Inventory. Native American Heritage Commission, Sacramento, CA. Stewart, Ornar 1943 Notes on Porno Ethnogeography. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 40 (2): 29-62. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles. The Lewis Publishing Company 1889 An Illustrated History of Sonoma County, California. Thompson, Thomas H. 1877 Historical Atlas Map of Sonoma County, California. Thos. H. Thompson & Co. Oakland. Tourney, Honoria 1926 History of Sonoma County. Volume 1, pp 321. The Si. Clarke Publishing Co., San Francisco Western Sonoma County Historical Society. Travis, Russell B. 1952 Geology of the Sebastopol quadrangle, California. San Francisco, State of California, Department of Natural Resources, Division of Mines. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) 2017 Natural Resource Conservation Service Web Soil Survey. Electronic application, http://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/webSoilsurveyaspx accessed August 15, 2017. Western Sonoma County Historical Society
1978 National Register of Historical Places Inventory — Nomination Forms for Gold Ridge Farm, Electronic document, https://npgallery.nps.gov/GetAsset?assetlD=3agfbofd-6f7b.4d73-g51c77~d~ocga59g 2003 Images of America: Sebastopol. Arcadia Publishing. 2017 Western Sonoma County Historical Society, Electronic Document, http://www.wschsgrf.org. Accessed August 12, 2017. Wickstrorn, Brian P., and David A. Fredrickson 1989 Archaeological Investigations at CA-SON-20, Santa Rosa, Sonoma County, California. Unpublished report on file at the Northwest Information Center, Rohnert Park, California, under S-2870.
Evans & Dc Shazo, Inc Page 28 EVANS DE SHAZO, INC V I IJSIOIIIL PIlI5K11 VAI1ON
APPENDIX A:
CORRESPONDANCE RELATED TO SACRED SITES INVENTORY AND NATIVE AMERICAN CONSULTATION
6876 Sebastopol Avenue Sebastopol, CA 95472 wwwevans-des hazocom ~, EVANS £~ DR SHAZO LLC t.J FIISTOIUC I~TWSFIfltAffON
July 10, 2017
Native American Heritage Commission 915 Capitol Mall, Room 364 Sacramento, CA 95814
RE: Sacred Lands Inventory Request Project Information:
Cultural Resources Study for Development of a Restroom Facility at Luther Burbank’s Gold Ridge Experiment Farm, 777 Bodega Avenue, Sebastopol, Son oma County, California 7777 Bodega Avenue, Sebastopol, Sonoma County, California Sebastopol (1980) Township 6 North Range 2 and 3 West Unsectioned land
Proiect Description: Evans & De Shazo, Inc. (EDS) is in the process of conducting a Cultural Resources Study for the proposed development of a restroom building within the Luther Burbank Gold Ridge Experiment Farm located within a 3.22-acre property at 7777 Bodega Highway, Sebastopol, Sonoma County, California, within Assessor Parcel Number (APN) 060-222-029 (Project Area). The Cultural Resource Study is being conducted due to a requirement by the City of Sebastopol Planning Department to ensure that Historical Resources and Tribal Cultural Resources are identified pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) regulations and guidelines. We are contacting you to request a Sacred Sites inventory for the Project Area (map attached) and a list of Native Americans to contact for further information. Please email the results to [email protected].
Respectfully,
—-
Sally Evans, M.A., RPA Principal Archaeologist PLEASE REPLY TO: [email protected]
6876 Sebastopol Avenue Sebastopol, CA 95472 (707) 812-7400 I www.evans-deshazo.com S t?pu A
/ 2?
V ~
I 3~t I1W~
Copyright © 2th 3 National Geographic Societ~ -cul
0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles County 0 1:24,000 Project Location Map Luther Burbank Gold Ridge Experiment Farm 7777 Bodega Avenue, Sebastopol, Sonoma County, CA. APN 060-222-029 (3.22 acres) ~3JAIEOELALIEORN1A gdmu~j~~awn. Jr.. On vprn or NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION 1550 Harbor Blvd., Suite 100 West Sacramento1 CA 95691 (916) ~73-37l0 Fax (916) 373-5471
July 26, 2017 Sally Evans Evans & De Shazo
Sent by Email: [email protected] Number of Pages: 2
RE: Restroom Facility at Luther Burbank, Sebastopol, Sonoma County
Dear Ms. Evans:
A record search of the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) Sacred Lands File was completed for the area of potential project effect (APE) referenced above with negative results, Please note that the absence of specific site information in the Sacred Lands File does not indicate the absence of Native American cultural resources in any APE.
I suggest you contact all of those listed, if they cannot supply information, they might recommend others with specific knowledge. The list should provide a starting place to locate areas of potential adverse impact within the APE. By contacting all those on the list, your organization will be better able to respond to claims of failure to consult. If a response has not been received within two weeks of notification, the NAHC requests that you follow-up with a telephone call to ensure that the project information has been received. If you receive notification of change of addresses and phone numbers from any of these individuals or groups, please notify me, With your assistance we are able to assure that our lists contain current information. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact via email: Sharaya.souza~nahc.ca.gov. Sincerely,
C .C4 C
Sharaya Souza Staff Services Analyst Native American Heritage Commission Native American Contacts 7/21/2017
Federated Indians of Graton Rancherla Mishewal-Wappo Tribe of Alexander Valley Greg Sarris, Chairperson Scott Gabaldon, Chairperson 8400 Redwood Drive, Ste 300 Coast Miwok 2275 Silk Road Wappo
Rohnert Park CA 94928 Southern Porno Windsor , CA 95492 (707) 566-2288 Office [email protected] (707) 566-2291 Fax (707) 494-9159
Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria Gene Buvelot 6400 Redwood Drive, Ste 300 Coast Miwok
Rohnert Park , CA 94928 Southern Porno gbuvelot@gratonrancheria. (415) 279-4844 Cell (707) 566-2288 ext 103
Kashia Band of Porno Indians of the Stewarts Point Reno Keoni Franklin, Chairperson 1420 Guerneville Rd. Ste 1 Porno
Santa Rosa , CA 95403 [email protected] (707) 591-0580 Office (707) 591-0583 Fax Lytton Rancheria of California Marjorie Mejia, Chairperson 437Aviation Blvd Porno
Santa Rosa , CA 95403 [email protected] (707) 575-5917 (707)575-6974- Fax
Middletown Rancheria Jose Simon Ill, Chairperson P.O. Box 1035 Porno
Middletown , CA 95461 Lake Miwok (707) 987-3670 Office (707) 987-9091 Fax
This fist is current only as of the date of this document and is based On the Information available to the Commission on the date it was produced. Distribution of this list does not relieve any person of statutory responsibility as defined in Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code, section 509194 of the Public Resource Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code. This list is only applicable for contacting local Native Americans with regard to cultural resources assessments for the updated contact fist for Restroom Facility at Luther Burbank, Sebastopol, Sonoma County. ), EVANS £~ DE SHAZO, INC ‘~~‘AflcTIAgOI.OOY i_fl JI!S1OX IC PRESERV:\TION
July 31, 2017
Mr. Gene Buvelot Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria 6400 Redwood Drive, Ste 300 Rohnert Park, CA 94928
Re: Cultural Resource Study for Development of a Restroom Facility at Luther Burbank’s Gold Ridge Experiment Form, 7777 Bodego Avenue, Sebastopol, Sonomo County, California
Dear Mr. Buvelot, Evans & De Shazo, Inc. (EDS) is in the process of conducting a Cultural Resources Study (CR5) for the proposed development of a restroom building within the Luther Burbank Gold Ridge Experiment Farm located within a 3.22- acre property at 7777 Bodega Highway, Sebastopol, Sonoma County, Califàrnia, within Assessor Parcel Number (APN) 060-222-029 (Project Area). The Cultural Resource Study is being conducted due to a requirement by the City of Sebastopol Planning Department to ensure that Historical Resources and Tribal Cultural Resources are identified pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) regulations and guidelines. EDS is conducting the study pro-bono for the Western Sonoma County Historical Society, the non-profit organization who is proposing the development of the new restroom facility. The methods being used to conduct the CRS include a record search at the Northwest Information Center (NWIC), a literature review, a Native American Sacred Sites inventory conducted by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), and a field survey. The Native American Sacred Sites inventory that was conducted by the NAHC for the Project Area on July 26, 2017 did not indicate the presence of any Native American Sacred Sites within the Project Area. Although the Sacred Sites inventory was negative, the NAHC recommended that we contact you for further information about Sacred Sites, Tribal Cultural Resources, or other Native American resources that have the potential to be impacted by the Project. If you have any information regarding Native American traditional cultural resources, including Sacred Sites, or Tribal Cultural Resources located within the Project Area, or if you have any concerns about Tribal Cultural Resources being impacted by the proposed project, please contact me at your earliest convenience at (707) 812- 7400, or sally~evans-deshazo.com. Please know that your comments and concerns about the Project are very important to EDS, the Project applicant, and the City of Sebastopol Planning Department, as well as to successful completion of the Project. Thank you in advance for taking the time to review this request for information and consultation. I look forward to hearing from you at your earliest convenience.
Respectfully,
Sally Evans, M.A., RPA Principal Archaeologist
Evans & De Shazo, Inc. 6876 Sebastopol Avenue Sebastopol, CA 95472 EVANS DE SHAZO, INC IlISTOKIC PIIESERV.V]’IC)N
July 31, 2017
Mr. Reno Keoni Franklin, Chairperson Kashia Band of Porno Indians of the Stewarts Point 1420 Guerneville Road, STE 1 Santa Rosa, CA 95403
Re: Cultural Resource Study for Development of a Restroom Facility at Luther Burbank’s Gold Ridge Experiment Farm, 7777 Bodego Avenue, Sebastopol, Sonoma County, Colifornia
Dear Mr. Franklin, Evans & be Shazo, Inc. (EDS) is conducting a Cultural Resources Study (CR5) for the proposed development of a restroom building within the Luther Burbank Gold Ridge Experiment Farm located within a 3.22-acre property at 7777 Bodega Highway, Sebastopol, Sonorna County, California, within Assessor Parcel Number (APN) 060-222-029 (Project Area). The Cultural Resource Study is being conducted due to a requirement by the City of Sebastopol Planning Department to ensure that Historical Resources and Tribal Cultural Resources are identified pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) regulations and guidelines. EDS is conducting the study pro-bono for the Western Sonoma County Historical Society, the non-profit organization who is proposing the development of the new restroom facility. The methods being used to conduct the CR5 include a record search at the Northwest Information Center (NWIC), a literature review, a Native American Sacred Sites inventory conducted by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), and a field survey. The Native American Sacred Sites inventory that was conducted by the NAHC for the Project Area on July 26, 2017 did not indicate the presence of any Native American Sacred Sites within the Project Area. Although the Sacred Sites inventory was negative, the NAHC recommended that we contact you for further information about Sacred Sites, Tribal Cultural Resources, or other Native American resources that have the potential to be impacted by the Project. If you have any information regarding Native American traditional cultural resources, including Sacred Sites, or Tribal Cultural Resources located within the Project Area, or if you have any concerns about Tribal Cultural Resources being impacted by the proposed project, please contact me at your earliest convenience at (707) 812- 7400, or [email protected]. Please know that your comments and concerns about the Project are very important to EDS, the Project applicant, and the City of Sebastopol Planning Department, as well as to successful completion of the Project. Thank you in advance for taking the time to review this request for information and consultation. I look forward to hearing from you at your earliest convenience.
Respectfully,
Sally Evans, MA., RPA Principal Archaeologist
Evans & De Shazo, Inc. 6876 Sebastopol Avenue Sebastopol, CA 95472 EVANS DE SHAZO, INC ~~~pF~’kRduAf:C)LoGY IIISTOIUC PILESERV:V][ON
July 31, 2017
Mr. Scott Gabaldon, Chairperson Mishewal-Wappo Tribe of Alexander Valley 2275 Silk Road Windsor, CA 95492
Re: Cultural Resource Study for Development of a Restroom Facility at Luther Burbank’s Gold Ridge Experiment Farm, 7777 Bodega Avenue, Sebastopol, Sonoma County, California
Dear Mr. Gabaldon, Evans & Dc Shazo, Inc. (EDS) is conducting a Cultural Resources Study (CR5) for the proposed development of a restroom building within the Luther Burbank Gold Ridge Experiment Farm located within a 3.22-acre property at 7777 Bodega Highway, Sebastopol, Sonoma County, California, within Assessor Parcel Number (APN) 060-222-029 (Project Area). The Cultural Resource Study is being conducted due to a requirement by the City of Sebastopol Planning Department to ensure that Historical Resources and Tribal Cultural Resources are identified pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) regulations and guidelines. EDS is conducting the study pro-bono for the Western Sonoma County Historical Society, the non-profit organization who is proposing the development of the new restroom facility. The methods being used to conduct the CRS include a record search at the Northwest Information Center (NWIC), a literature review, a Native American Sacred Sites inventory conducted by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), and a field survey. The Native American Sacred Sites inventory that was conducted by the NAHC for the Project Area on July 26, 2017 did not indicate the presence of any Native American Sacred Sites within the Project Area. Although the Sacred Sites inventory was negative, the NAHC recommended that we contact you for further information about Sacred Sites, Tribal Cultural Resources, or other Native American resources that have the potential to be impacted by the Project. If you have any information regarding Native American traditional cultural resources, including Sacred Sites, or Tribal Cultural Resources located within the Project Area, or if you have any concerns about Tribal Cultural Resources being impacted by the proposed project, please contact me at your earliest convenience at (707) 812- 7400, or [email protected]. Please know that your comments and concerns about the Project are very important to EDS, the Project applicant, and the City of Sebastopol Planning Department as well as to successful completion of the Project. Thank you in advance for taking the time to review this request for information and consultation. I look forward to hearing from you at your earliest convenience.
Respectfully,
Sally Evans, M.A., RPA Principal Archaeologist
Evans & De Shazo, Inc. 6876 Sebastopol Avenue Sebastopol, CA 95472 EVANS DE SHAZO, INC ~~~W~/ARCltAItOl.OGY hISTORIC pRI:SERv:vno2q
July 31, 2017
Ms. Marjorie Mejia, Chairperson Lytton Rancheria of California 437 Aviation Blvd Santa Rosa, CA 95403
Re: Cultural Resource Study for Development of a Restroom Facility at Luther Burbank’s Gold Ridge Experiment Farm, 7777 Bodega Avenue, Sebastopol, Sonoma County, California
Dear Ms. Mejia, Evans & De Shazo, Inc. (EDS) is conducting a Cultural Resources Study (CR5) for the proposed development of a restroom building within the Luther Burbank Gold Ridge Experiment Farm located within a 3.22-acre property at 7777 Bodega Highway, Sebastopol, Sonoma County, California, within Assessor Parcel Number (APN) 060-222-029 (Project Area). The Cultural Resource Study is being conducted due to a requirement by the City of Sebastopol Planning Department to ensure that Historical Resources and Tribal Cultural Resources are identified pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) regulations and guidelines. EDS is conducting the study pro-bono for the Western Sonoma County Historical Society, the non-profit organization who is proposing the development of the new restroom facility. The methods being used to conduct the CRS include a record search at the Northwest Information Center (NWIC), a literature review, a Native American Sacred Sites inventory conducted by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), and a field survey. The Native American Sacred Sites inventory that was conducted by the NAHC for the Project Area on July 26, 2017 did not indicate the presence of any Native American Sacred Sites within the Project Area. Although the Sacred Sites inventory was negative, the NANC recommended that we contact you for further information about Sacred Sites, Tribal Cultural Resources, or other Native American resources that have the potential to be impacted by the Project. If you have any information regarding Native American traditional cultural resources, including Sacred Sites, or Tribal Cultural Resources located within the Project Area, or if you have any concerns about Tribal Cultural Resources being impacted by the proposed project, please contact me at your earliest convenience at (707) 812- 7400, or [email protected]. Please know that your comments and concerns about the Project are very important to EDS, the Project applicant, and the City of Sebastopol Planning Department, as well as to successful completion of the Project. Thank you in advance for taking the time to review this request for information and consultation. I look forward to hearing from you at your earliest convenience.
Respectfully,
Sally Evans, MA., RPA Principal Archaeologist
Evans & De Shazo, Inc. 6876 Sebastopol Avenue Sebastopol, CA 95472 -‘S 4~) EVANS DE SRAzo~ INC RCI3AI~C)T.O(n’ H1S1CIRJC PRT~SE k\ :\1ION
July 31, 2017
Mr. Greg Sarris, Chairperson Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria 6400 Redwood Drive, Ste 300 Rohnert Park, CA 94928
Re: Cultural Resource Study for Development of a Restroom Facility at Luther Burbank’s Gold Ridge Experiment Farm, 7777 Bodego Avenue, Sebastopol, Sonoma County, California
Dear Mr. Sarris, Evans & Dc Shazo, Inc. (EDS) is in the process of conducting a Cultural Resources Study (CR5) for the proposed development of a restroom building within the Luther Burbank Gold Ridge Experiment Farm located within a 3.22- acre property at 7777 Bodega Highway, Sebastopol, Sonoma County, California, within Assessor Parcel Number (APN) 060-222-029 (Project Area). The Cultural Resource Study is being conçiucted due to a requirement by the City of Sebastopol Planning Department to ensure that Historical Resources and Tribal Cultural Resources are identified pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) regulations and guidelines. EDS is conducting the study pro-bono for the Western Sonoma County Historical Society, the non-profit organization who is proposing the development of the new restroom facility. The methods being used to conduct the CRS include a record search at the Northwest Information Center (NWIC), a literature review, a Native American Sacred Sites inventory conducted by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), and a field survey. The Native American Sacred Sites inventory that was conducted by the NAHC for the Project Area on July 26, 2017 did not indicate the presence of any Native American Sacred Sites within the Project Area. Although the Sacred Sites inventory was negative, the NAHC recommended that we contact you for further information about Sacred Sites, Tribal Cultural Resources, or other Native American resources that have the potential to be impacted by the Project. If you have any information regarding Native American traditional cultural resources, including Sacred Sites, or Tribal Cultural Resources located within the Project Area, or if you have any concerns about Tribal Cultural Resources being impacted by the proposed project, please contact me at your earliest convenience at (707) 812- 7400, or [email protected]. Please know that your comments and concerns about the Project are very important to LOS, the Project applicant, and the City of Sebastopol Planning Department, as well as to successful completion of the Project. Thank you in advance for taking the time to review this request for information and consultation. I look forward to hearing from you at your earliest convenience.
Respectfully,
Sally Evans, M.A., RPA Principal Archaeologist
Evans & De Shazo, Inc. 6876 Sebastopol Avenue Sebastopol, CA 95472 44111) EVANS DE SHAZO; INC \ç~5j~*:~I{C!IAEOLOGY TIJSTOIttL ?REsIm\ ATl0~
July 31, 2017
Mr. Jose Simon Ill, Chairperson Middletown Rancheria P.O. Box 1035 Middletown, CA 95461
Re: Cultural Resource Study for Development of a Restroom Facility at Luther Burbank’s Gold Ridge Experiment Farm, 7777 Bodeqa Avenue, Sebastopol, Sonoma County, California
Dear Mr. Simon, Evans & De Shazo, Inc. (EDS) is conducting a Cultural Resources Study (CR5) for the proposed development of a restroom building within the Luther Burbank Gold Ridge Experiment Farm located within a 3.22-acre property at 7777 Bodega Highway, Sebastopol, Sonoma County, California, within Assessor Parcel Number (APN) 060-222-029 (Project Area). The Cultural Resource Study is being conducted due to a requirement by the City of Sebastopol Planning Department to ensure that Historical Resources and Tribal Cultural Resources are identified pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) regulations and guidelines. EDS is conducting the study pro-bono for the Western Sonoma County Historical Society, the non-profit organization who is proposing the development of the new restroom facility. The methods being used to conduct the CR5 include a record search at the Northwest Information Center (NWIC), a literature review, a Native American Sacred Sites inventory conducted by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), and a field survey. The Native American Sacred Sites inventory that was conducted by the NAHC for the Project Area on July 26, 2017 did not indicate the presence of any Native American Sacred Sites within the Project Area. Although the Sacred Sites inventory was negative, the NAHC recommended that we contact you for further information about Sacred Sites, Tribal Cultural Resources, or other Native American resources that have the potential to be impacted by the Project. If you have any information regarding Native American traditional cultural resources, including Sacred Sites, or Tribal Cultural Resources located within the Project Area, or if you have any concerns about Tribal Cultural Resources being impacted by the proposed project, please contact me at your earliest convenience at (707) 812- 7400, or sally@evans-deshazo,com. Please know that your comments and concerns about the Project are very important to EDS, the Project applicant, and the City of Sebastopol Planning Department, as well as to successful completion of the Project. Thank you in advance for taking the time to review this request for information and consultation. I look forward to hearing from you at your earliest convenience.
Respectfully,
Sally Evans, MA., RPA Principal Archaeologist
Evans & De Shazo, Inc. 6876 Sebastopol Avenue Sebastopol, CA 95472 Middletown Rancheria Tribal Historic Preservation Department P.O. Box 1035 Middletown, CA 95461
August 4,2017 Via Electronic Mail
Ms. Sally Evans, MA., RPA Principal Archaeologist Evans & Dc Shazo, LLC 6876 Sebastopol Avenue Sebastopol, CA 95472
Re: Cultural Resource Study for Development of a Restroom Facility at Luther Burbank’s Gold Ridge Experiment Farm, 7777 Bodega Avenue, Sebastopol, Sonoma County, California
Dear Ms. Evans:
The Middletown Rancheria (Tribe) is in receipt of your letter dated, July 31, 2017, regarding 7777 Bodega Avenue, Sebastopol, Sonoma County, California,
Though we have no specific comments at this time, should any new information or evidence of human habitation be found as the project progresses, we request that all work cease and that you contract us immediately. We do have a process to protect such important and sacred resources.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments to the above referenced project. The Tribe looks forward to continuing to be a part of the archaeological processes.
Nothing herein should be construed to be a waiver of or limitation of any of the Tribe’s rights in law, in equity, or otherwise. All rights. claims and remedies are specifically reserved. Sincerely,
S ephanie Reyes Tn istoric Preservation Officer
Fax (707) 987-9091 Phone (707) 987-3670 ext 115 8/15/2017 Evans & De Show, LLC Mall - Luther Burbank’s Gold Ridge Experiment Farm
C ~ Sally Evans ~saIIy@evans deshazo corn>
Luther Burbank’s Gold Ridge Experiment Farm 3 messages
[email protected]
Sally Evans
Take care,
—Sally [Quoted text hIdden]
Sally Evans, M.A., RPA Principal Archaeologist! Cultural Resource Specialist Evans & Do Shazo, Inc. (DBEISBEIWBE) http://www.evans-deshazo.com!
Main Office 707-812-7400 office 707-484-9628 I cell 6876 Sebastopol Avenue Sebastopol, CA 95472
Oregon Field Office 971-344-2826
EVANS SHAZO, INC 1,1 SIOICI~ L:rSI;.V.flIC,S
Iorin~stewartspoint.org
1/2 81412017 Evans & De Shazo, LLC Mail - Luther Burbanks Gold Ridge Experiment Farm, 7777 Bodega Avenue, Sebastopol, Sonoma County n ~i r~i ~ Sally Evans [email protected]>
Luther Burbanks Gold Ridge Experiment Farm, 7777 Bodega Avenue, Sebastopol, Sonoma County 2 messages
[email protected]
Dear Sally Evans,
Thank you for your outreach and request for identification of cultural resources from the Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria. The project area identified in your correspondence is within the Tribe’s ancestral territory and there may be tribal cultural resource impacts. Please provide the Tribe with the results of your research efforts and recommendations. The information can be enialled or mailed to the following address.
Sincerely, Buffy McQuillen Tribal Heritage Preservation Officer (THPO) Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) Office: 707.566.2288; ext. 137 Cell: 707.318.0485 FAX: 707.566.2291
Antonette Tomic
THPO Administrative Assistant Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria
6400 Redwood Drive, Suite 300 Rohnert Park, CA 94928
Office: 707.566.2288, ext. 143
Fax: 707.566.2291 atomic~gratonrancheria.com
& ~ please consider our environment before printing this email.
Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria and Tribal TANF of Sonoma & Mann. Proprietary and confidential CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This transmittal is a confidential communication or may othenvise be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this transmittal In error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this transmittal is strictly
112 814/2017 Evans & De Shazo, LLC Mail - Luther Burbanks Gold Ridge Experiment Farm, 7777 Bodega Avenue, Sebastopol, Sonoma County prohibited. If you have received this communication In en-or, please notify this office at 707-566-2288, and immediately delete this message and all its attachments, if any. Thank you.
Sally Evans
Thank you for the quick response. I will forward you the draft report once it is complete, which I expect will be in the next two weeks.
All the best,
Sally LQuoted text hidden]
Sally Evans, M.A., RPA Principal Archaeologist) Cultural Resource Specialist Evans & De Shazo, Inc. (DBEISBEIWBE) http:/Jwww.evans-cleshamcoml
Main Office 707-812-7400 ofl1ce 707-484-9628 I cell 6876 Sebastopol Avenue Sebastopol, CA 95472
Oregon Field Office 971-344-2826
,~≠ EVANS(~3DE SHAZO, INC (LI APIII.LIUr II I~1I)ILIL IIIISI1V,VYPI)N
2/2 9/5/2017 Evans & Do Shazo, LLC Mail - Luther Burbanks Gold Ridge Experiment Farm, 7777 Bodega Avenue, Sebastopol, Sonoma County n icii r~1 Sally Evans ~saIly~evans-deshazo.com>
Luther Burbanks Gold Ridge Experiment Farm, 7777 Bodega Avenue, Sebastopol, Sonoma County
Sally Evans
As requested, I have attached the Archaeological Study report for the proposed restroom building at Luther Burbank’s Gold Ridge Farm in Sebastopol. Once you have had a chance to review the report, please let me know if you have any questions or comments.
I have also cc’d Jim Passage, who is President of the Board of Directors for the West County Historical Society. The WCI-IS maintains the Gold Ridge Farm and are the one’s responsible for the project. The work is being done pro bono by various members of the community in support of the WCHS, a non-profit organization.
Respectfully,
Sally
On Fri, Aug 4,2017 at 9:08 AM, THPO~gratonrancheria.com
Sally Evans, M.A., RPA Principal Archaeologist I Cultural Resource Specialist Evans & Os Shazo, Inc. (DBEISBEIWBE) http:/fwww.evans-deshazo.com/
Main Office 707-812-7400 office 707-464-9628 I cell 6876 Sebastopol Avenue Sebastopol, CA 95472
Oregon Field Office 971-344-2826
I41P EVANS~DESHAZO, INC poI,,Qn IJI~IOIcI~ ‘ftISI I: V~IIc
J-2017-06-AO1 -0151 Gold Ridge Luther Burbank Farm Archaeological Report_Reduced.pdf 2855K
1/1 ~9~~Az /~q O~
March 12, 2018, except as modified by th nditions of approval, and is valid for a period of three (3) years during w me the rights granted must be exercised. However, the applicant may est one (1) one-year extension of this Use Permit from the Planning Dire , pursuant to Zoning Ordinance §17.250.050.
AYES: air Fritz, Vice Chair Douch, and Commissioners Glaser, Kelley, Wilson, Jacob and Doyle
NOE . None TAIN: None
B. PUBLIC PARK PROJECT REVIEW: The West Sonoma County Historical Society, has applied for a park project review for a project at the Burbank Experiment Farm, 7781 Bodega Avenue. The request involves a proposal to build a small freestanding building to serve as a restroom, a much needed use. The building would house two restrooms, one for women and one for men. The new building would be largely, but not completely, screened from view by trees and bushes. The construction would include a handicap accessible path from the nearby parking area. The Commission’s action on this matter is advisory to the City Council.
Assistant Planner Morrison presented the staff report.
The Commission asked questions of Director Webster. Chair Fritz asked if the applicant wished to make a presentation.
On behalf of the West Sonoma County Historical Society, Jim Passage, gave a brief presentation and was available for questions.
The Commission asked questions of Mr. Passage.
Chair Fritz asked if members of the public wished to speak on this item. ila Benavidez-Heaster, Bodega Avenue, commented: o Has been reviewing this application. • Lives nearby at Burbank Heights. o Concerned with homeless population.
- A lot of our homeless hang out at the Burbank Experiment Farm.
- The police have had to be called on them over the years. o Glad to hear that the bathrooms will not be open 24 hours per day. o Even after looking at the drawings, she finds it hard to understand how exactly the structure is going to be operated. o Fully supports this application and the addition of the restrooms.
- People who are visiting the Experiment Farm will sometimes go into the rec room at Burbank Heights and ask to use their restroom.
- These restrooms are needed at the Burbank Experiment Farm. o Expressed some concern over parking, however she did not consider that a big issue at this time.
- Parking is something that should be paid attention to however. o The folks at the Burbank Experiment Farm are very generous with the residents of Burbank Heights.
- They have a good relationship with each other. o Questioned what would happen on days when City offices were closed if Public Works was responsible for locking and unlocking the restrooms. o Unsure how to deter the homeless.
Hearing nothing further, Chair Fritz closed the public hearing and brought it back to the Commission for discussion.
The Commission asked additional questions of Director Webster and Mr. Passage.
Commissioner Doyle commented: • There should be a plan worked out for maintenance, services, locking and unlocking, supplies, cleaning, etc. before a lot of money is spent. • Would hate to build these restrooms only to leave them regularly locked due to maintenance or other issues.
Chair Fritz concurred.
The Commission agreed on being supportive of this application and commented that it was appropriate for the site.
Hearing nothing further, Chair Fritz adjourned the meeting at 7:58 p.m. for a brief break.
Chair Fritz reconvened the meeting at 8:03 p.m.
C. DRAFT ZONING ORDINANCE COMPREHENSIVE TEX~puø~ATE: This entails a comprehensive update to the City’s Zoning Ordinanc9.-t6 make a variety of amendments. The Planning Commission has bee_p*orking on the revisions at a series of public meetings since fall 2017 and ~ is expected to be the Commission’s final review before transmit~Lrf~ its recommendations to the City Council, which will also have a public htring on the matter. The amendments include changes related to definitiony’use allowances, general development standards, zoning districts, and afiditional revisions. Specific revisions include but are not limited to consolidatio!JAf several similar zoning districts, standards for mobile food trucks and compf’ercial outdoor barbeques, downtown noise standards, updating of formula busi~3a~s provisions, and organizational changes. The intent of the revisions is to achie consistency with the City’s new General Plan, address selected policy issue/streamline provisions, provide standards for several uses not currently addressØ, and address internal consistency issues. A public hearing was conducted on7’rch 27; the item was continued for further review.
Beth Thompson,7”Novo Planning Group, provided an introduction.
The CommisØd~ asked questions of Ms. Thompson and Director Webster throughout their discussion),”
Comm~p~ioner Glaser commented: 0/Referred to, ‘17.08.080 Definitions ‘F’ and noted a typo under, ‘Family Day Care Homes. 2.’ o Referred to the definition of, ‘Floor area ratio (FAR)’ and asked why it includes the option of decimals in, ‘one or two places’.
Ms. Thompson responded that it could be either or
5 4wdn uPip{n~
,‘/ Von accnnamhVI~nn / J’petpicn.nnn hula!
/c:nnlnrslonnoo paddep spaces
P11110, Pin CCC 1101! slas pheil ha ~j~rr~Pflhr 2~, ~ Ill ~
Pile, Vfnmadanal synph~ ci .Iatnrnaiancl 0500id01dill bCFpcrColPonrda NO -. PARIGNG aconisblly ccc lil.Po3j2ll bpldaocudeChcolnrll I ONLY Vl1dlhlnllnMo ni,in. B,sncCanllSjG3flI CA~KIN ~j:~ bcCh!PCLJP11 MINIMUM • ~3:~ L. COfltheE — ~ FINE $2~J 4- drmh4empjm 45~~yi ATC~S~Lt-~ - above he ~tnde ~L.— Muovilea null
Pare: u~ aacnuPin poddeip uiolusnau unclean to CoItnc~ bolcEnIpcodePiOI3 coupon lb. ‘Pipe ‘hal be nnnaciarftnd. 2. P0110,0 spaCe ldnnhlccnljon hgm to camp hCoilolrda boOcho code il&sncflon tIl$02.d 3. VfClrnoIion 000111 *tjol cho,oclnn, con be cued Os lacIer, I lb70Zd.
ACCESSIBLE STALL STRIPING ACCESSIBILITY SIGN SCALP: I d41b0 ICALPi 3~rO [1~
/ )
011”
~0 ?ZELIMIN1A2~N’- Fog
?LAnjs P 9~ILleO gw: fl++-Ar,nn gpptflLF~fl
Pg#; C 4L/70tj.
‘4 (e~A C ~1N~- LOT—. PATRICK STAtWJ~P AE6REVIATIONS PROJECT INFORHATIÔ AS ?OTE+ifXOLT ~aa ‘00 AETET[EN~L CITY OF SEBASIOFOL PATRICK SLATTIER S~AVTER P0,1 00.LXT?XLX ALT LOgE 1120 EOVESA AVEILE PQ BOX 141 AIDS ATOIIXCF.RAL SESASTOPOL, CA 15472 SEBASTOPOL CA 15413 PHI SJ’TEOX 107 - 523 - [53 707 - 521 - 1010 ARCUITECT ErO 040Th EtC ILEOCTO 0,4 TacO POST OFFICE DIX 041 SI TOM SE B A STOP CL POT TOTTEM 610 CII. FOR NI A 95473 lISA OTECa 701 829 . 9090 Ca CAIJFOISJ00510X10000 Cl. CaTER LEO ‘[6 00,100 COO ‘[EAR Cot CrJcWT Coo CTIOLTITO COAT COATAITES d FV.A1JT[~LX1T,1 Pt COOS TOT TOTAl, Cf TflAOFLR PROJECT NOTES 5054) TLEXSLR 0,14 PLASOA’L ALL CONSTR.LOTIO[l SHALL COMPLY NITh TIE PEOJREMENTS OF THE FOLLCtOING; ElI OT000 2010 CALIFORNIA AVMINISTRAT[’/E COVE (Tills 24, Port I) TI TOTOA 2010 CALIFORNIA BJILVING COVE (Title 24, Port 2) PR COO TIAR ERSOOlO 2010 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL COVE (TalC 24. PortS) 2016 CALIFORNIA IECHANICAL COVE (Title 24, Port 4) [A TIM Er? EW?AT100 2016 CALIFORNIA FL[AOBINS COVE (Title 24, Port 5) TCTRCIL 2016 CALIFORNIA ENERGY COVE (Title 24, PortS) — LOAETI EAST EWATION sctlnl ElEVATION SeGtQN A TO TaTE [fQ 4 r.o’ SCALE IN FEET 114’ [01 SCALE [[I FEET [14” [-0 [CALl 01 FEET 2076 CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL EVILVING COVE (Title 24, Port 5) [0? LOCATE 2016 CALIFORNIA FIRE COVE (TItle 24, Port I) EXT [0110101 fEll FOIOPITEI 2016 CALIFORNIA EXISTiNG BJILVING COVE (Title 24, Port [0) PA PlATO 2010 CALIFORNIA REFERENCED STMVARVS COVE (Title 24, Port 2) IX FifThS ft FLOOR 2016 INTERNATiONAL PROPERTY I{AJNTEILX1CE COVE CITY OF SEBASTOPOL COVES MV REGAJLATIO[S POOlS TRQTT6 Ft TOOT CR PET ES P00106 flaB VRM’ANGS SMALL NOT BE 03EV FOR MW OThER PROJECT [N IWLE OR IN 0 GAElIC PART BY ANYONE NOT MNNG A CONTRACT NIlE THE ARCHITECT OR NIT[~T SALT GAU000EEO THE 10ZITTEN CONSENT OF TIE ARCHITECt ASH 1t4,VR000 0111 [OVAl. ‘01 ‘00,10 P141 XCERVATI[R 61010. 60 41110 VIMENSIONS SKM,L NOT BE SCALED FROM IHESE VRNNINGS, NT~ITTEX4 AR ClAD! VIMENSIONS SHALL GOVERIL COIFLICTS POTHIN THE VRM[A+SS SHALL BE 0W40 611011 TePID PAlATE. AT 9100 AS [ClOTS ERO4GHT TO THE Il-SOEVIATE ATTENTION OF TEE ARCHITECT. ANT’ VISCREPANCY PRINT DATES tICOTA NICE 40 TOW-oaT OR CCS01LICT NITH PEPICTEV CONVITIONS MV EXISTING PIELV CONDITIONS, OR 01OCT03 04114117 1)001 TOIL 000,1053 NORM IN PROGRESS, SHALE. BE E,RC~5HT TO ThE I1IEVIATE ATIENTION OP ThE PESTlES 0014111 ION 50004011 I ATLO’EOPOOTEA EXT TItER ARCHITECT. ALL VIVE1ISIONS MV CONDITIONS SHALL BE EXANINEP ANV TOFU 0if[ZORATAL VERIFIED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTiON. AS [t1[COITAL lEVER / 01 fEAST TAT ETE6JCI4 IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF ThE GEMERAL CONTRACTOR MV ALL ST XST SJECONIRACTORS TO REVIEN COMPLETE SETS OP VOOMENTS FOR ALL ER EXOFOOT [MI [MOSS!! PORTIONS 0’ ItIRX ANV TO ERRING TO ThE ANCHITECTS ATTENTION THE [65 P0104 REOOIREMENT FOR CLANIPICATION FOR NAY COWLICTS PHICH HAl’ BE VEPICTEV [00 LOCATES g6s gooLO FRJOR TO THE CONTRACTOR COISIENCING MW NORM OR PREPARNS Mt BIV 100 TA04[A[. FOR TEAT PORTION OP WORM. fax — 100)1 XTCAAA000L 100 1004006 VI1eSIONS ARE TO FACE OP FRAMING UNLESS OTAIERHIEE NOTED. HE lOCAL ~tgn~ ElEVATION ItT ELEVATION ~ECN1OH B ~4H 10~ fLOW00001X 114,1-01 [IV SCALE [05 FEET [/4. A SCALE IN FEET PROTECT OJILVING MATERIALS VELIVEREV TO TOE CONST~tTION SITE PROM liE VISIONS HA 0.00TH 41’ TAOAW0000 RAN MV OTHER SCLRCCS OF MOISTURE. IL KCTO4JAI 1”H 00 [ES WA 101 AFRJCAFLE PRO’,TVE OPNER PATTI ALL MMIJFACTURER INSTALLATiON NOV OPERATING 400) A[XALO 00 06006 HMISALS FOR ALL INSTALLEV IWAFACTUREV COMPONENTS. SITS [6110 SCALE TA 0010000 0’ OACCA[0< CIT CTTCA6L PEP Poll ifr,if P101011 LOCATION HAP PER 001100 EEOC CAl, 001106340 POW FEI700ME TOOl TEO{’OEAV POW PEWLOE’OSAR 9, TEAl! 9,1 9,11110 PIP P0104 PLO SOlAcE TOOT if TOILS POT CAERE 104 PT 900651 1[E’TWERPQST PIER POOlE SEATTO CESAIXIT GTE AThlETE OWl P0006? F-’— lIAR 516101010406 r ~ TOOT PETAIO,LAR aLt: ~ “4- 0 OW
I ‘I 1 F
I’
S
a
~d fl
Arflt~SD SY~ ~~‘w~jI~j