DOCSLIB.ORG

Uva-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Uva-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Ethnic and civic identity: incompatible loyalties? The case of Armenians in Post- Soviet Georgia Hin, J.A. Publication date 2003 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Hin, J. A. (2003). Ethnic and civic identity: incompatible loyalties? The case of Armenians in Post-Soviet Georgia. Universiteit van Amsterdam/AGIDS. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:27 Sep 2021 11 INTRODUCTION 1.11.1 Multi-ethnicity and the legitimacy of post-Soviet states Withh the collapse of the Soviet Union about a decade ago, post-Soviet states came into being.. This statement may seem logical and lacking substantive content but a collective conceptt for the newly independent states that emerged from the former Soviet Union is valuable.. These states, no matter how different they are, not only have a common past but sharee a particular legacy of a regime that profoundly changed the structure of its society andd the attitudes of its people. Nowadays, while trying to develop democratic regimes, all thee post-Soviet states are having to deal with this specific heritage from Soviet times. Thee struggle around a crucial issue facing these newly independent states, the questionn concerning the legitimacy of their democratic regimes, clearly reveals distinct tracess left from Soviet times. A regime can be regarded as legitimate if the citizens of the statee consider it to be legitimate, even though it may be considered 'wrong' according to universall standards (Bakker & Schulte Northolt 1996: 21). The former Soviet regime so oftenn used arbitrary policies and high-ranking officials abused their power so frequently thatt nowadays most people in the post-Soviet states distrust the institutions coordinating thee civil administration, the police and the military. This distrust is reinforced by the fact thatt the former leaders - the so-called Nomenklatura - still hold most of the high-level positionss within the regimes of these recently established states. Since there has been no traditionn of participation in state structures and only punishment for those who chose to challengee the previous regime, there is not much significant or effective protest to be heard,, in spite of the high level of education in these states, the relatively modern infrastructuree and the large number of civic organizations - for example, political parties, culturall organizations, youth organizations. Nevertheless, one cannot conclude that the citizenss of a state regard a regime as legitimate on the basis of a lack of organized protest againstt it: people might be disinterested in politics or accept the regime but disobey the basicc political laws thereby undermining its authority. Itt is generally assumed that the legitimacy of a regime is complicated when the compositionn of the population is multi-ethnic - as it is in almost all the newly independentt states in the former Soviet Union. The proposition that ethnic and civic identityy comprise incompatible loyalties stems from the fact that an integration of various ethnicc groups is uncertain and potentially destabilizing since people tend to identify with theirr own (ethnic) group and view other (ethnic) groups as a threat to their position and status.. In order to establish a legitimate regime, however, the various ethnic groups need too be integrated to such an extent that they all support the regime and comply with basic politicall laws. In post-Soviet states, the integration of various ethnic groups is complicatedd by their specific history. The regime of the Soviet Union not only stressed butt even institutionalized the ethnic identity of people, and linked ethnicity to status by assigningg dominant political and cultural positions within the fifteen Union Republics onlyy to the members of the titular groups of these republics, for example, Georgians in Georgiaa and Armenians in Armenia. Some non-titular ethnic groups were granted more authorityy than others through the establishment of autonomous regions and areas within 15 5 thesee Union Republics. These features have left their mark on post-Soviet citizenries and theirr states. Legitimizationn of the state is essential but problematic in multi-ethnic states, and post-Soviett states have encountered specific problems in this area. Important questions arise:: Is the authority in post-Soviet states firmly in the hands of the newly established regimes?? Are the various ethnic groups in post-Soviet states integrated to such an extent thatt they support their regimes? Do they generally comply with basic political laws? To whatt extent is this legitimization in post-Soviet states the result of the multi-ethnic compositionn of its populations? What is the influence of the specific Soviet heritage? Transcaucasiaa is an interesting region in which to study these questions because of its strategicc location and its links to Russia and the Middle East. The recent rivalry between thee United States, Russia, Iran and Turkey to gain influence in the region and control overr the enormous oil reserves in the Caspian Sea has emphasized once more the importantt geopolitical position of Transcaucasia. Stability in the three Transcaucasian statess including the legitimization of their regimes by their citizens is an important issue nott only to the region itself but also to other countries eager to exploit the oil fields and layy pipelines for the transportation of this oil. Anotherr factor that makes a study of the legitimacy of Transcaucasian regimes interestingg is that they have to deal with an unprecedented entanglement of smaller and largerr nations, clans, tribes, cultures, religions, alphabets, traditions and customs in the region.. (The Arabs used to call the Caucasus range 'The Mountains of Languages'.) That legitimizationn by such a diverse population is difficult has become clear ever since the disintegrationn of the Soviet Union. The political situation in the newly independent states off Transcaucasia - Georgia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan - has remained turbulent and troublesome.. While Azerbaijan and Armenia have been in conflict over the Nagorno- Karabakhh region since 1988, Georgia has experienced three civil wars since the late 1980s. Off the three Transcaucasian states, Georgia has the largest number of ethnic minoritiess living within its borders. According to the last Soviet census of 1989, 30 percentt of the population in Georgia did not belong to the Georgian ethnic group. Among thee population of Azerbaijan, the same census found only 17 percent without the titular ethnicityy - of which most of the Armenians outside Nagorno-Karabakh (4%) have since leftt as a result of the conflict in this region. In the population of Armenia only 6 percent weree recorded as not belonging to the Armenian ethnic group, of which most were Azeri (3%)) and do not live there anymore for the same reason (Anderson & Silver 1996). Thatt multi-ethnicity has been problematic for the Georgian state is illustrated by thee record of civil wars in Georgia since independence: two out of the three wars which ragedd through the state were based on ethnic conflicts, and the third was the result of tensionss over nationalistic policies and the nationalistic attitude of the country's first democraticallyy elected president. Peace returned in the end of 1993 though the problems inn the areas of conflict have not been solved and a cease-fire is in effect. Since then the state,, under the leadership of President Shevardnadze, has made a fresh start: a new democraticc constitution was passed, parliament became more decisive, and in 1995 the 16 6 economyy started to grow for the first time in years.' But a regime has to be legitimized by variouss ethnic groups if stability is to be retained and consolidated in Georgia. Sincee Georgia faced complications of legitimacy from having a multi-ethnic populationn but has found political stability (at least temporarily), it is interesting to focus onn Georgia in a study on the legitimacy of a post-Soviet regime. Georgia finds itself at thee center of geopolitical games around the oil reserves in Azerbaijan and while Armenia hass been excluded from transporting oil from Azerbaijan as a result of conflicts between thee two states, Georgia has already become involved in various options related to oil- pipelinee (re)construction. 1.21.2 The Republic of Georgia Thee Republic of Georgia regained its independence in 1991. Like the other two Transcaucasiann republics, it was independent for a short period after the collapse of the Russiann Empire until being invaded by the Bolsheviks (1918-1921). The first time the Georgiann state appeared on the map as a unified kingdom was in the twelfth century. Georgiaa is thus an ancient entity but the centuries and decades in which it was not an autonomouss unity account for most of its history. The Transcaucasian region was conqueredd time and again by various invaders because of its important geopolitical locationn at the crossroads between East and West, between the Christian and the Muslim worlds. Thesee various conquerors left their mark on the Georgian land, among other thingss in the diversity of the population whether by converting groups to another religion, byy changing their mother tongue, by welcoming new ethnic groups or by deporting other ethnicc groups.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The HOMENETMEN LEADER's GUIDE
    The HOMENETMEN LEADER’S GUIDE Հ.Մ.Ը.Մ.ական ՂԵԿԱՎԱՐԻ ՈՒՂԵՑՈՅՑ English Version Second Edition 2.1 February 2019 Prepared by: Dr. Shahe Yeni-Komshian Commissioned by: Homenetmen Western USA Regional Executive Board Sponsored by: Homenetmen Central Executive Board The content of the Homenetmen Leader’s Guide includes original writings by SY, as well as edited past documents and/or reproduction of already prepared documents. The Guide is available on-line as an e-document, at: www. Homenetmen.net The Homenetmen Leader’s Guide was Developed on the Occasion of the 100th Anniversary of HOMENETMEN As a Tribute to its Remarkable Contribution to Armenian Society, In the Hopes of Educating Future Generations of Leaders to Carry on the Torch. SY 2 PREFACE Homenetmen has bylaws, rules and regulations, but no formal leadership development program. Governing bodies also do not have a comprehensive orientation guide for new board members. Hence this guidebook. This Guide is primarily written for the leadership of Western USA Region. However, the entire Homenetmen family with all of its Regions and Chapters could use this guidebook, with minor adjustments of region specific information. WHY Do We Need to HAVE a GUIDE for LEADERS? Every nonprofit organization needs a board development process. Homenetmen has to give tools to those leaders who are expected to lead our youth, to better explain to them their role and responsibilities, educate them about their position and functions and help improve their performance. Quality leaders are better mentors. This Guide may be utilized for two purposes: 1. As a reference handbook, adopted by any Homenetmen leader, or 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Armenians in the Making of Modern Georgia
    Armenians in the Making of Modern Georgia Timothy K. Blauvelt & Christofer Berglund While sharing a common ethnic heritage and national legacy, and an ambiguous status in relation to the Georgian state and ethnic majority, the Armenians in Georgia comprise not one, but several distinct communities with divergent outlooks, concerns, and degrees of assimilation. There are the urbanised Armenians of the capital city, Tbilisi (earlier called Tiflis), as well as the more agricultural circle of Armenians residing in the Javakheti region in southwestern Georgia.1 Notwithstanding their differences, these communities have both helped shape modern Armenian political and cultural identity, and still represent an intrinsic part of the societal fabric in Georgia. The Beginnings The ancient kingdoms of Greater Armenia encompassed parts of modern Georgia, and left an imprint on the area as far back as history has been recorded. Moreover, after the collapse of the independent Armenian kingdoms and principalities in the 4th century AD, some of their subjects migrated north to the Georgian kingdoms seeking save haven. Armenians and Georgians in the Caucasus existed in a boundary space between the Roman-Byzantine and Iranian cultures and, while borrowing from both spheres, struggled to preserve their autonomy. The Georgian regal Bagratids shared common origins with the Armenian Bagratuni dynasty. And as part of his campaign to forge a unified Georgian kingdom in the late 11th and early 12th centuries, the Georgian King David the Builder encouraged Armenian merchants to settle in Georgian towns. They primarily settled in Tiflis, once it was conquered from the Arabs, and in the town of Gori, which had been established specifically for Armenian settlers (Lordkipanidze 1974: 37).
    [Show full text]
  • Mother Tongue: Linguistic Nationalism and the Cult of Translation in Postcommunist Armenia
    University of California, Berkeley MOTHER TONGUE: LINGUISTIC NATIONALISM AND THE CULT OF TRANSLATION IN POSTCOMMUNIST ARMENIA Levon Hm. Abrahamian Berkeley Program in Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies Working Paper Series This PDF document preserves the page numbering of the printed version for accuracy of citation. When viewed with Acrobat Reader, the printed page numbers will not correspond with the electronic numbering. The Berkeley Program in Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies (BPS) is a leading center for graduate training on the Soviet Union and its successor states in the United States. Founded in 1983 as part of a nationwide effort to reinvigorate the field, BPSs mission has been to train a new cohort of scholars and professionals in both cross-disciplinary social science methodology and theory as well as the history, languages, and cultures of the former Soviet Union; to carry out an innovative program of scholarly research and publication on the Soviet Union and its successor states; and to undertake an active public outreach program for the local community, other national and international academic centers, and the U.S. and other governments. Berkeley Program in Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies University of California, Berkeley Institute of Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies 260 Stephens Hall #2304 Berkeley, California 94720-2304 Tel: (510) 643-6737 [email protected] http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~bsp/ MOTHER TONGUE: LINGUISTIC NATIONALISM AND THE CULT OF TRANSLATION IN POSTCOMMUNIST ARMENIA Levon Hm. Abrahamian Summer 1998 Levon Abrahamian is a Professor of Anthropology and head of the project Transfor- mations of Identity in Armenia in the 20th Century at the Institute of Ethnography of Yer- evan State University.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissertation Final Aug 31 Formatted
    Identity Gerrymandering: How the Armenian State Constructs and Controls “Its” Diaspora by Kristin Talinn Rebecca Cavoukian A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Political Science University of Toronto © Copyright by Kristin Cavoukian 2016 Identity Gerrymandering: How the Armenian State Constructs and Controls “Its” Diaspora Kristin Talinn Rebecca Cavoukian Doctor of Philosophy Department of Political Science University of Toronto 2016 Abstract This dissertation examines the Republic of Armenia (RA) and its elites’ attempts to reframe state-diaspora relations in ways that served state interests. After 17 years of relatively rocky relations, in 2008, a new Ministry of Diaspora was created that offered little in the way of policy output. Instead, it engaged in “identity gerrymandering,” broadening the category of diaspora from its accepted reference to post-1915 genocide refugees and their descendants, to include Armenians living throughout the post-Soviet region who had never identified as such. This diluted the pool of critical, oppositional diasporans with culturally closer and more compliant emigrants. The new ministry also favoured geographically based, hierarchical diaspora organizations, and “quiet” strategies of dissent. Since these were ultimately attempts to define membership in the nation, and informal, affective ties to the state, the Ministry of Diaspora acted as a “discursive power ministry,” with boundary-defining and maintenance functions reminiscent of the physical border policing functions of traditional power ministries. These efforts were directed at three different “diasporas:” the Armenians of Russia, whom RA elites wished to mold into the new “model” diaspora, the Armenians of Georgia, whose indigeneity claims they sought to discourage, and the “established” western diaspora, whose contentious public ii critique they sought to disarm.
    [Show full text]
  • Agbu Armenia Newsletter Issue 18, January-February, 2012 Agbu President Speaks to French News About Passing of Genocide Bill by the French Senate
    ARMENIAN GENERAL BENEVOLENT UNION AGBUAGBU ARMENIAARMENIA NEWSLETTERNEWSLETTER Yerevan, Armenia IN THIS ISSUE ISSUE 18, JANUARY-FEBRUARY, 2012 AGBU Central Board meets in Geneva (p. 1) ARMENIAN GENERAL BENEVOLENT UNION AGBU President speaks about CENTRAL BOARD MEETS IN French Senate’s draft bill on Armenian Genocide (p. 2) GENEVA AGBU-AYA “Ahramjian” The Armenian General Benevolent Union (AGBU) Central Board of Directors Center opens in Beirut (p. 2, 3) just completed two days of meetings in Geneva, Switzerland, where Board AGBU Central Board member members discussed a host of topics, including new programs and projects, Sam Simonian received by the education initiatives and upcoming events across the globe. Also attending Yerevan Mayor (p. 3) the meetings were AVC virtual tour in Matenada- representatives of ran (p. 4) AGBU Council of AGBU AVC presentation in Trustees, AGBU Tbilisi (p. 4) Europe and the AGBU AVC announced Strategic Advisory Spring Term 2012 (p. 4) Council to the Bo- Second phase of NUR starts in ard. Artsakh (p. 5) AGBU Yerevan Scouts ascend "It had been the mount Hatis (p. 5) practice and tradi- Eduard Topchjan’s first con- tion of the Central cert with Spain’s Premium Board to hold its Symphony Orchestra (p. 6) meetings from ti- Winter events of AGBU me to time in Swit- Youth Centers (p. 6) zerland, where the worldwide organi- UGAB Jeunes receives RA AGBU Central Board and AGBU CB member Vahe Gabrache of Geneva Diaspora Ministry award (p. 7) zation has been incorporated since 1924. In addition, Geneva provided an ideal location for AGBU Diaspora Youth pro- grams in Armenia and Mos- Board members from around the world to convene, report on projects under- cow for summer 2012 (p.
    [Show full text]
  • ART WORK HAMAZKAYIN English HAMAZKAYIN ARTWORK
    CONTENT EDITORIAL 1 IN TUNE WITH THE TIMES CULTURAL ACTIVITIES 2-13 HAMAZKAYIN COMBINES THE TRADITIONAL WITH THE REFRESHING AND THE INNOVATIVE THE HAMAZKAYIN THEATRE GROUP OF NEW YORK HAMAZKAYIN’S MOZAIC V CONCERT THE EREBUNI DANCE ENSEMBLE AND THE HAMAZKAYIN DANCE INSTITUTE A WEEK DEDICATED TO SOS SARGSIAN LITERATURE MUSIC HAMAZKAYIN EVENTS LECTURES EXPANSION DANCE ART THEATRE MOVIES EDUCATION 14 MELANKTON AND HAIG ARSLANIAN DJEMARAN THE ARMENOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF HAMAZKAYIN THE MARSEILLE DJEMARAN FORUM HAMAZKAYIN CENTRAL BOARD PROJECTS 15 GOAL-ORIENTED PROJECTS AND NEW AREAS OF ACTIVITIES HAMAZKAYIN INSTITUTIONS 16-25 ARSHAK AND SOPHIE GALSTAUN COLLEGE (SPECIAL REPORT) AN ARMENIAN ENVIRONMENT IN SYDNEY CURRENT TOPIC 26-28 ORGANIZING THE DIASPORA HAMAZKAYIN ARCHIVES 29 THE NATION IN THE WHIRLWIND OF LETTERS HAMAZKAYIN PUBLICATIONS 30 Editor: Loucig Guloyan-Srabian Design: Unicess Cover: Araz Kelian Layout: Ani Pehlivanian-Sarkissian Printing: Hamazkayin Vahe Sethian Publishing House EDITORIAL IN TUNE WITH THE TIMES In keeping with its mission of struggling for the survival of the Armenian homeland and the nation Hamazkayin aims at preserving, developing and spreading Armenian culture and education. In 2013 the Society celebrated its 85th year of dedicated service. Long-lived organizations may develop over time distinctive positive or negative characteristics. A positive example would be the accumulated experience, if, of course, a significant amount of experience is transmitted from one generation to the next. On the other hand, negative characteristics, such as misplaced self-confidence built up over time, could also be a determining factor. The 85-year-old Hamazkayin does not claim to be experienced; it does not claim to be free from neg- ative aspects.
    [Show full text]
  • XIX Saukune Saqartvelos Istoriasi Gardamtexi Epoqaa
    George Sanikidze G. Tsereteli Institute of Oriental Studies, Ilia State University, Georgia BETWEEN EAST AND WEST: 19TH C. FRENCH PERCEPTION OF GEORGIA The 19th century is a turning point in the history of Georgia. After its incorporation into the Russian Empire radical changes took place in the country. Europeans have taken an ever increasing interest in Georgia, specifically in its capital Tbilisi. This article discusses a change in France’s perception of Georgia and its capital during the nineteenth century. The nineteenth century French memoirs and records on Georgia can be divided into three basic groups. These groups reflect changes in the political and economic situation in the East-West relations which had immediate implications for Georgia. The first period coincides with the “Great Game” during the Napoleonic wars when Georgia inadvertently became part of France’s Eastern policy. The French sources on Georgia are comprised of so- called Treaty of Finkenshtein between France and Persia, French newspapers (Le moniteur, Journal de l’Empire, Nouvelles étrangères...) reporting, and data on Georgia by French envoys in Persia (General Ange de Gardane (1766–1818), Amadée Jaubert (1779-1847), Joseph Rousseau (1780-1831), Camille Alphonse Trézel (1880-1860)...). The second period was a time of taking interest economically in Georgia and its capital Tbilisi, which by then (especially under the so-called preferential tariff policy) had become a transit trade route for European goods going East, Iran in particular. In this regard an invaluable source is the work by the first French consul in Tbilisi Chevalier Jacques François Gamba (1763-1833). Although the economic activity of France in the Caucasus relatively slowed after the preferential tariff was revoked (1831), many French still traveled to Georgia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Theater and Library in Tbilisi Austin Jersild Old Dominion University, [email protected]
    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons History Faculty Publications History 2002 The Dilemmas of Enlightenment in the Eastern Borderlands: The Theater and Library in Tbilisi Austin Jersild Old Dominion University, [email protected] Neli Melkadze Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/history_fac_pubs Part of the Cultural History Commons, and the European History Commons Repository Citation Jersild, Austin and Melkadze, Neli, "The Dilemmas of Enlightenment in the Eastern Borderlands: The Theater and Library in Tbilisi" (2002). History Faculty Publications. 35. https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/history_fac_pubs/35 Original Publication Citation Jersild, A., & Melkadze, N. (2002). The dilemmas of enlightenment in the eastern borderlands: The theater and library in Tbilisi. Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History, 3(1), 27-49. doi:10.1353/kri.2002.0012 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the History at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Dilemmas of Enlightenment in the Eastern Borderlands: The Theater and Library in Tbilisi* Austin Jersild and Neli Melkadze [The theater] cultivates taste, acquaints us with the works of great artists, with the ideas of geniuses, and presents to the crowd the beginnings of the fine arts, that is, the most noble aspirations of humanity. [Russian] G. S., Kavkaz, 1854 The awakening of the people is of no significance without theater and folk poetry. [Georgian] A. K., Droeba, 1876 The Russian field is quickly accumulating a wide variety of works on Russian imperialism.
    [Show full text]
  • Armenian Diaspora in Modern
    Armenian Diaspora in Modern World Factors of Changes Edited by Wojciech Bejda & Paweł Nieczuja-Ostrowski Title: Armenian Diaspora in Modern World: Factors of Changes Edited by: Wojciech Bejda & Paweł Nieczuja-Ostrowski Reviewers: Zviad Abashidze, Krzysztof Fedorowicz DTP: Patrycja Nieczuja-Ostrowska Cover Illustration: Paweł Nieczuja-Ostrowski Published: © Research Institute for European Policy, Gdańsk 2020 ISBN 978-83-954212-3-5 CONTENTS Introduction 7 Part I The Global Perspective Paweł Nieczuja-Ostrowski & Rafał Raczyński 1. Modern Diasporas from a Political Science Perspective: the Case of Armenian Diaspora 11 Edita Gzoyan 2. The League of Nations and Formation of Armenian Diaspora 35 Hayk Yengibaryan 3. The State Plan for the 1946-1948 Great Repatration of Armenians and the Armenian Apostolic Church 55 Adam Pomieciński 4. Syrian Armenians in Armenia. Adaptation-Reintegration- Diaspora 70 Paweł Nieczuja-Ostrowski 5. Political Factors of Changes of the Armenian Diaspora in Modern-Day World 86 Paweł Nieczuja-Ostrowski 6. Security as a Factor in Transforming the Armenian Diaspora 104 Part II The Case of Armenian Community in Poland Nikol Margaryan 7. Integration through Personal Names: The Experience of Armenian Diaspora in Poland 121 Marek Lichota 8. Armenians in Zamość in the Sixteenth and Eighteenth Centuries and Their Influence on Past and the Present of the City 131 Grzegorz Pełczyński 9. Changes in the Armenian-Catholic Rite in Poland in the 20th Century 149 Paweł Nieczuja-Ostrowski 10. Institutionalization of Armenian Life in Modern Poland 163 Renata Król-Mazur 11. Armenian Diaspora in Poland – an Outline of the Problem 199 Renata Król-Mazur 12. Armenian Education in Poland 234 Appendix 267 References 277 Index of Persons and Places 315 LIST OF TABLES 1.
    [Show full text]
  • For Submission
    Between Host-Countries and Homeland: Institutions, Politics and Identities in the Post-Genocide Armenian Diaspora (1920s to 1980s) by Vahe Sahakyan A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Near Eastern Studies) in the University of Michigan 2015 Doctoral Committee: Professor Kevork B. Bardakjian, Chair Associate Professor Carol B. Bardenstein Emeritus Professor Gerard J. Libaridian Associate Professor Ara Sanjian, University of Michigan - Dearborn Professor Ronald G. Suny Professor Khachig Tölölyan, Wesleyan University ©Vahe Sahakyan 2015 To my parents ii Acknowledgments The completion of this project owes much to a large number of scholars, academics and intellectuals, friends and family members. My academic journey in diaspora studies began due to my training as a sociologist at Yerevan State University, Armenia. My sociological curiosity was quick to capture the significant differences in how Armenianness was experienced and expressed in the diaspora, when I first encountered third-fourth generation Armenian-Americans upon my arrival at the University of Michigan as a Junior Faculty Development Program visiting scholar in Fall 2004. This generous grant I was awarded by the US Department of State’s Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs provided me a possibility to spend a year at one of the leading American universities, where my interest in Armenian diasporic identities and institutions took shape. Frequent and often endless conversations with Kevork Bardakjian and Gerard Libaridian provided additional impetus to my curiosity. It was due to their continued encouragement and support that two years after returning to Armenia I finally decided to apply and was admitted to the Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Armenian Studies Past to Present
    ARMENIAN STUDIES PAST TO ARMENIAN STUDIES INSTITUTE PRESENT Armenian Studies Past to Present ARMENIAN STUDIES PAST TO PRESENT Armenian Studies Past to Present table of contents Hrant Dink Foundation Bolis Armenian Studies Institute rapporteur Introduction 6 Aras Ergüneş editor Armenian Studies in Europe 9 Altuğ Yılmaz Armenian Studies in the United States 16 content support Vahakn Keşişyan, Mehmet Polatel Armenian Studies in the Middle East 21 translator Bob Beer Armenian Studies in Russia, Ukraine and Georgia 24 design Bülent Erkmen Armenian Studies in Armenia 26 graphics application Erge Yeksan The Foundations of Armenian Studies in Turkey 29 prepress assistance From the Early Republican Period to the 1990s 30 Barış Akkurt printed in The Role of Newspapers and Individual Researchers after 1923 31 Mas Matbaacılık San. ve Tic. A.Ş. Hamidiye Mahallesi, Soğuksu Caddesi 3 Kağıthane 34408 İstanbul, TR The 1990s and Transformation 36 T +90 212 294 10 00 [email protected] Armenian Studies in Turkey from 2000 to the Present 38 Istanbul, April 2018 Toward a New Research Center 42 ISBN xxxxxxxxx Hrant Dink Foundation Bolis (Armenian Studies) Institute 43 APPX. 1 Armenian Studies Periodicals 46 © Hrant Dink Foundation Publications APPX. 2 Armenian Studies Centers Outside Armenia 50 Anarad Hığutyun Binası, Papa Roncalli Sk. No: 128 Harbiye 34373 Şişli, İstanbul T: +90 212 240 33 61 F: +90 212 240 33 94 [email protected] hrantdink.org This report was prepared with support from table of contents the Consulate General of Sweden 5 ıntroductıon methodological approaches employed in these studies to produce scholarly knowledge, form the fundamental parameters which This report has been prepared as part of work to establish an in- determine whether they will or will not be included in the field of stitute within the Hrant Dink Foundation in order to present the Armenian Studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Uva-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Ethnic and civic identity: incompatible loyalties? The case of Armenians in Post- Soviet Georgia Hin, J.A. Publication date 2003 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Hin, J. A. (2003). Ethnic and civic identity: incompatible loyalties? The case of Armenians in Post-Soviet Georgia. Universiteit van Amsterdam/AGIDS. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:04 Oct 2021 33 GEORGIA IN HISTORICAL AND GEOGRAPHICAL PERSPECTIVE E Inn this chapter, an account is given of the relevant background factors for the analysis of identificationidentification among Armenians within the Republic of Georgia and includes historical as welll as geographical aspects of the state. The first part deals with Georgia in general and iss subdivided into three time periods: Georgia before 1918 and as the first independent Republicc of Georgia between 1918 and 1921 (3.1); Georgia as one of the Union Republicss within the Soviet Union (3.2); and Georgia from the transition in 1985 and sincee its renewed independence in 1991 (3.3).
    [Show full text]