International Organizations and Democratic Backsliding

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

International Organizations and Democratic Backsliding The Unintended Consequences of Democracy Promotion: International Organizations and Democratic Backsliding Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Anna M. Meyerrose, M.A. Graduate Program in Political Science The Ohio State University 2019 Dissertation Committee: Alexander Thompson, Co-Advisor Irfan Nooruddin, Co-Advisor Marcus Kurtz William Minozzi Sara Watson c Copyright by Anna M. Meyerrose 2019 Abstract Since the end of the Cold War, international organizations (IOs) have engaged in unprecedented levels of democracy promotion and are widely viewed as positive forces for democracy. However, this increased emphasis on democracy has more re- cently been accompanied by rampant illiberalism and a sharp rise in cases of demo- cratic backsliding in new democracies. What explains democratic backsliding in an age of unparalleled international support for democracy? Democratic backsliding oc- curs when elected officials weaken or erode democratic institutions and results in an illiberal or diminished form of democracy, rather than autocracy. This dissertation argues that IOs commonly associated with democracy promotion can support tran- sitions to democracy but unintentionally make democratic backsliding more likely in new democracies. Specifically, I identify three interrelated mechanisms linking IOs to democratic backsliding. These organizations neglect to support democratic insti- tutions other than executives and elections; they increase relative executive power; and they limit states’ domestic policy options via requirements for membership. Lim- ited policy options stunt the development of representative institutions and make it more difficult for leaders to govern. Unable to appeal to voters based on records of effective governance or policy alternatives, executives manipulate weak institutions to maintain power, thus increasing the likelihood of backsliding. ii Empirically, this dissertation makes several contributions. First, I create and val- idate a latent variable-based cross-national indicator, the Democratic Institutional Strength (DIS) index. The DIS index draws on a theoretically based conceptual- ization of democratic backsliding, an increasingly important concept for which there had been no previous metric. Second, I combine original and existing panel data to test my theory and find that membership in IOs associated with democracy pro- motion makes subsequent democratic backsliding more likely. Such IOs also lead to reduced checks on executive power, limited economic policy options, and stunted party development in new democracies. Case studies of democratic backsliding in the European Union (EU) illuminate these causal mechanisms. Focusing on the EU’s two most extreme cases to date, Hungary and Poland, I illustrate how EU requirements contribute to backsliding by decreasing states’ domestic policy space and increasing executive power. The theory and findings contribute to debates on how international factors impact domestic outcomes, especially processes of democratization, as well as to nascent theories of democratic backsliding. iii This is dedicated to my parents, Seth, and Minette, all of whom have been unfailing sources of love, support, and purrs. iv Acknowledgments This dissertation is a result of invaluable support I received throughout my six years at The Ohio State University. I am particularly indebted to my co-chairs, Alexander Thompson and Irfan Nooruddin, without whom this project would not exist. I cannot thank Alex enough for agreeing to advise what was initially a heavily comparative dissertation, his guidance as I identified the international relations com- ponent of my research, his conscientious advising and feedback on countless drafts of this project, and his willingness to spend two or more hours per meeting helping me through my latest crisis with a combination of intellectual guidance and exceedingly dry wit. I also want to thank Irfan in particular for sparking the initial idea for this project during my first year at Ohio State, for introducing me to countless amazing and kind political scientists around the country, for helping me navigate the publish- ing process, and for breaking up the drudgery of conferences with group gatherings. Thank you for the long-distance support of your “last” Ohio State student. I am equally thankful to my other committee members, in particular for their day-to-day advising and emotional support. I thank Sara Watson for our countless meetings, our research forays into the French Senate, and her constant consideration for my personal as well as professional well-being and her unwaveringly positive out- look. Most if not all of the analyses in this project would have been problematic v without William Minozzi, who, along with Jason Morgan, became a sort of quantita- tive methods sherpa for my cohort. Finally, I thank Marcus Kurtz for forcing me to think hard about the design and assumptions in this project as well as his ongoing support as my graduate path evolved over time. In addition to my committee, my other colleagues at Ohio State have been critical sources of support and intellectual inspiration. My cohort, over the course of our in- numerable workshops and other informal meetings, should be commended for reading countless drafts of my work, and helping me realize not only when what I said was absolute nonsense, but also helping me identify solutions. I am especially thankful for their willingness to accept me as the “only girl” in the group and for an inordinate amount of time spent gossiping in offices and at bars. I am also thankful for my female colleagues from other cohorts that became a constant source of support and friendship, especially Leyla Tosun, Ruthie Pertsis, and Linnea Turco. These fellow graduate students, along with Macarena Guerrero and Amy Knuppe, have become lifelong friends for whom I am immensely grateful. I would not have reached this point without the unconditional love and support from my family and long-distance friends. I especially want to thank my parents, who never seem to doubt that I can do anything I want, as well as my friends who have been there from the beginning, especially Kate, Elizabeth, Vanessa, Nuray, Allie, Julie, and Danielle. Finally, I thank my partner, Seth. Through all my doubts, all my missteps, and also through my successes, he has always believed in, supported, and, when necessary, tolerated me. vi Vita 2012 . .B.A. International Studies, Rhodes College 2013–2018 . Graduate Associate, The Ohio State University 2015 . .M.A. Political Science, The Ohio State University 2017–2018 . Virtual Student Federal Service E- Intern, United States Agency for International Development, Democracy, Human Rights, and Gov- ernance Center Publications Research Publications Meyerrose, A. M. (2018). It is all about value: How domestic party brands influence voting patterns in the European Parliament. Governance, 31(4), 625–642. Meyerrose, A. M., Flores, T. E., & Nooruddin, I. (2019). From Elections to Democ- racy in Hard Times. In Oxford research encyclopedia of politics. University of Oxford Press. Fields of Study Major Field: Political Science vii Table of Contents Page Abstract....................................... ii Dedication...................................... iv Acknowledgments..................................v Vita......................................... vii List of Tables.................................... xi List of Figures................................... xiv 1. Introduction: Democratic Backsliding in an Age of International Democ- racy Promotion................................1 1.1 Research Design............................9 1.2 Plan of the Dissertation........................ 13 2. Conceptualizing and Measuring Democratic Backsliding: The Democratic Institutional Strength Index......................... 16 2.1 Democracy and Democratic Backsliding............... 19 2.1.1 What Is Democracy?...................... 19 2.1.2 Theories of Autocratic Reversion............... 21 2.1.3 Defining Democratic Backsliding............... 24 2.2 The Democratic Institutional Strength Index............ 29 2.2.1 DIS Measurement Validation................. 36 2.3 Next Steps............................... 39 viii 3. A Theory of International Organizations and Democratic Backsliding.. 42 3.1 Existing Theories of Democratic Backsliding............. 45 3.2 The International Side of Democracy................. 47 3.3 International Organizations and Democracy............. 49 3.3.1 Why Do IOs Promote Democracy?.............. 50 3.3.2 Which IOs Promote Democracy?............... 53 3.4 Theoretical Framework: Linking International Organizations and Democratic Backsliding........................ 54 3.4.1 Indirect Mechanism: Neglecting Important Democratic In- stitutions............................ 55 3.4.2 Direct Mechanism 1: Increasing Executive Power...... 58 3.4.3 Direct Mechanism 2: Limiting the Domestic Policy Space. 60 3.5 Scope Conditions............................ 65 3.6 Alternative Explanations........................ 69 3.7 The Counterfactual and Research Design............... 74 4. Linking International Organizations to Democratic Backsliding: A Cross- National Analysis............................... 78 4.1 Research Design............................ 79 4.1.1 Dependent Variable: The DIS Index............. 80 4.1.2 Independent Variables: IO Membership........... 80 4.1.3 Control Variables........................ 85
Recommended publications
  • Democratic Satisfaction, Political Knowledge and the Acceptance of Clientelism in a New Democracy
    Democratization ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/fdem20 Dissatisfied, uninformed or both? Democratic satisfaction, political knowledge and the acceptance of clientelism in a new democracy Sergiu Gherghina, Inga Saikkonen & Petar Bankov To cite this article: Sergiu Gherghina, Inga Saikkonen & Petar Bankov (2021): Dissatisfied, uninformed or both? Democratic satisfaction, political knowledge and the acceptance of clientelism in a new democracy, Democratization, DOI: 10.1080/13510347.2021.1947250 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2021.1947250 © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group Published online: 07 Jul 2021. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=fdem20 DEMOCRATIZATION https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2021.1947250 RESEARCH ARTICLE Dissatisfied, uninformed or both? Democratic satisfaction, political knowledge and the acceptance of clientelism in a new democracy Sergiu Gherghina a, Inga Saikkonen b and Petar Bankov a aDepartment of Politics and International Relations, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK; bSocial Science Research Institute, Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland ABSTRACT In many countries, voters are targeted with clientelistic and programmatic electoral offers. Existing research explores the demand side of clientelism, but we still know very little about what determines voters’ acceptance of clientelistic and programmatic electoral offers. This article builds a novel theoretical framework on the role that democratic dissatisfaction and political knowledge play in shaping voters’ acceptance of different types of electoral offers. We test the implications of the theory with a survey experiment conducted after the 2019 local elections in Bulgaria.
    [Show full text]
  • Download/Print the Study in PDF Format
    GENERAL ELECTION IN GREECE 7th July 2019 European New Democracy is the favourite in the Elections monitor Greek general election of 7th July Corinne Deloy On 26th May, just a few hours after the announcement of the results of the European, regional and local elections held in Greece, Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras (Coalition of the Radical Left, SYRIZA), whose party came second to the main opposition party, New Analysis Democracy (ND), declared: “I cannot ignore this result. It is for the people to decide and I am therefore going to request the organisation of an early general election”. Organisation of an early general election (3 months’ early) surprised some observers of Greek political life who thought that the head of government would call on compatriots to vote as late as possible to allow the country’s position to improve as much as possible. New Democracy won in the European elections with 33.12% of the vote, ahead of SYRIZA, with 23.76%. The Movement for Change (Kinima allagis, KINAL), the left-wing opposition party which includes the Panhellenic Socialist Movement (PASOK), the Social Democrats Movement (KIDISO), the River (To Potami) and the Democratic Left (DIMAR), collected 7.72% of the vote and the Greek Communist Party (KKE), 5.35%. Alexis Tsipras had made these elections a referendum Costas Bakoyannis (ND), the new mayor of Athens, on the action of his government. “We are not voting belongs to a political dynasty: he is the son of Dora for a new government, but it is clear that this vote is Bakoyannis, former Minister of Culture (1992-1993) not without consequence.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S.-Japan Approaches to Democracy Promotion
    U.S. JAPAN APPROACHES TO DEMOCRACY PROMOTION U.S. JAPAN Sasakawa Peace Foundation USA 1819 L St NW #300 Washington, DC 20036 [email protected] U.S.-JAPAN APPROACHES TO DEMOCRACY SASAKAWA USA SASAKAWA PROMOTION Edited by Michael R. Auslin and Daniel E. Bob ISBN 9780996656764 51000 > 9 780996 656764 U.S.-JAPAN APPROACHES TO DEMOCRACY PROMOTION Edited by Michael R. Auslin Daniel E. Bob Sasakawa Peace Foundation USA Sasakawa Peace Foundation USA is an independent, American non-profit and non- partisan institution devoted to research, analysis and better understanding of the U.S.-Japan relationship. Sasakawa USA accomplishes its mission through programs that benefit both nations and the broader Asia Pacific region. Our research programs focus on security, diplomacy, economics, trade and technology, and our education programs facilitate people-to-people exchange and discussion among American and Japanese policymakers, influential citizens and the broader public in both countries. ISBN: 978-0-9966567-6-4 Printed in the United States of America. © 2017 by Sasakawa Peace Foundation USA LCCN Number applied for Sasakawa USA does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views expressed herein are the authors’ own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Sasakawa USA, its staff or its board. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by and means without permission in writing from Sasakawa USA. Please direct inquiries to: Sasakawa Peace Foundation USA Research Department 1819 L Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20036 P: +1 202-296-6694 This publication can be downloaded at no cost at http://spfusa.org/ Cover photo: © EPA/Barbara Walton Contents Preface .............................................................................................................................v Dennis Blair and Yasushi Akashi INTRODUCTION U.S.-Japan Approaches to Democracy Promotion ............................................
    [Show full text]
  • PSCI 5113 / EURR 5113 Democracy in the European Union Mondays, 11:35 A.M
    Carleton University Fall 2019 Department of Political Science Institute of European, Russian and Eurasian Studies PSCI 5113 / EURR 5113 Democracy in the European Union Mondays, 11:35 a.m. – 2:25 p.m. Please confirm location on Carleton Central Instructor: Professor Achim Hurrelmann Office: D687 Loeb Building Office Hours: Mondays, 3:00 p.m. – 4:00 p.m., and by appointment Phone: (613) 520-2600 ext. 2294 Email: [email protected] Twitter: @achimhurrelmann Course description: Over the past seventy years, European integration has made significant contributions to peace, economic prosperity and cultural exchange in Europe. By contrast, the effects of integration on the democratic quality of government have been more ambiguous. The European Union (EU) possesses more mechanisms of democratic input than any other international organization, most importantly the directly elected European Parliament (EP). At the same time, the EU’s political processes are often described as insufficiently democratic, and European integration is said to have undermined the quality of national democracy in the member states. Concerns about a “democratic deficit” of the EU have not only been an important topic of scholarly debate about European integration, but have also constituted a major argument of populist and Euroskeptic political mobilization, for instance in the “Brexit” referendum. This course approaches democracy in the EU from three angles. First, it reviews the EU’s democratic institutions and associated practices of citizen participation: How
    [Show full text]
  • Calvinism Vs Wesleyan Arminianism
    The Comparison of Calvinism and Wesleyan Arminianism by Carl L. Possehl Membership Class Resource B.S., Upper Iowa University, 1968 M.C.M., Olivet Nazarene University, 1991 Pastor, Plantation Wesleyan Church 10/95 Edition When we start to investigate the difference between Calvinism and Wesleyan Arminianism, the question must be asked: "For Whom Did Christ Die?" Many Christians answer the question with these Scriptures: (Failing, 1978, pp.1-3) JOH 3:16 For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. (NIV) We believe that "whoever" means "any person, and ...that any person can believe, by the assisting Spirit of God." (Failing, 1978, pp.1-3) 1Timothy 2:3-4 This is good, and pleases God our Savior, (4) who wants all men to be saved and to come to a knowledge of the truth. (NIV) 2PE 3:9 The Lord is not slow in keeping his promise, as some understand slowness. He is patient with you, not wanting anyone to perish, but everyone to come to repentance. (NIV) REV 22:17 The Spirit and the bride say, "Come!" And let him who hears say, "Come!" Whoever is thirsty, let him come; and whoever wishes, let him take the free gift of the water of life. (NIV) (Matthew 28:19-20 NIV) Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, (20) and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you.
    [Show full text]
  • Wien Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna
    Institut für Höhere Studien (IHS), Wien Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna Reihe Politikwissenschaft / Political Science Series No. 45 The End of the Third Wave and the Global Future of Democracy Larry Diamond 2 — Larry Diamond / The End of the Third Wave — I H S The End of the Third Wave and the Global Future of Democracy Larry Diamond Reihe Politikwissenschaft / Political Science Series No. 45 July 1997 Prof. Dr. Larry Diamond Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace Stanford University Stanford, California 94305-6010 USA e-mail: [email protected] and International Forum for Democratic Studies National Endowment for Democracy 1101 15th Street, NW, Suite 802 Washington, DC 20005 USA T 001/202/293-0300 F 001/202/293-0258 Institut für Höhere Studien (IHS), Wien Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna 4 — Larry Diamond / The End of the Third Wave — I H S The Political Science Series is published by the Department of Political Science of the Austrian Institute for Advanced Studies (IHS) in Vienna. The series is meant to share work in progress in a timely way before formal publication. It includes papers by the Department’s teaching and research staff, visiting professors, students, visiting fellows, and invited participants in seminars, workshops, and conferences. As usual, authors bear full responsibility for the content of their contributions. All rights are reserved. Abstract The “Third Wave” of global democratization, which began in 1974, now appears to be drawing to a close. While the number of “electoral democracies” has tripled since 1974, the rate of increase has slowed every year since 1991 (when the number jumped by almost 20 percent) and is now near zero.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Disinformation on Democratic Processes and Human Rights in the World
    STUDY Requested by the DROI subcommittee The impact of disinformation on democratic processes and human rights in the world @Adobe Stock Authors: Carme COLOMINA, Héctor SÁNCHEZ MARGALEF, Richard YOUNGS European Parliament coordinator: Policy Department for External Relations EN Directorate General for External Policies of the Union PE 653.635 - April 2021 DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR EXTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT STUDY The impact of disinformation on democratic processes and human rights in the world ABSTRACT Around the world, disinformation is spreading and becoming a more complex phenomenon based on emerging techniques of deception. Disinformation undermines human rights and many elements of good quality democracy; but counter-disinformation measures can also have a prejudicial impact on human rights and democracy. COVID-19 compounds both these dynamics and has unleashed more intense waves of disinformation, allied to human rights and democracy setbacks. Effective responses to disinformation are needed at multiple levels, including formal laws and regulations, corporate measures and civil society action. While the EU has begun to tackle disinformation in its external actions, it has scope to place greater stress on the human rights dimension of this challenge. In doing so, the EU can draw upon best practice examples from around the world that tackle disinformation through a human rights lens. This study proposes steps the EU can take to build counter-disinformation more seamlessly into its global human rights and democracy policies.
    [Show full text]
  • Wesleys Trinitarian Ordo Salutis
    JOURNAL A Quarterly for Church Renewal VOLUME 14 . NUMBER 4 . 2005 Wesleys Trinitarian Ordo Salutis Corrie M. Aukema Cieslukowski Elmer M. Colyer INTRODUCTION .If)ne of the curious facts evident to anyone who spends ~ even a brief amount of time examining the secondary lit­ erature on John Wesley (the founder of Methodism) and his theology is how little has been written on Wesley's doctrine of the Trinity, save for a spate of recent articles.} Indeed, there is scant discussion of the Trinity in many books devoted to Wes­ ley's theology. This dearth of attention to the Trinity is especially clear in the area of Wesley's soteriology, his understanding of the ordo salutis (order of salvation). A classic example of this is The Scripture Way of Salvation: The Heart of John Wesley's Theology, a significant work by one of the premier contemporary experts on Wesley's theology.2 There is no chapter, and not even a subsection of a chapter, that deals with the Trinitarian deep­ structure of Wesley's understanding of salvation.3 In fact, there is no reference to the Trinity in the index and hardly any mention of the Trinity anywhere in the book despite the fact that Wesley understood the ordo in Trinitarian terms. Another example is Randy Maddox's book, Responsible Grace: John Wesley's Practical Theology.4 Maddox's study is out­ standing, possibly the best summary of Wesley's theology to WESLEY'S TRINITARIAN ORDO SALUTIS 107 106 WESLEY'S TRINITARIAN ORDO SALUTIS THE TRADITIONAL READING come into print in the past twenty years.
    [Show full text]
  • Egypt Presidential Election Observation Report
    EGYPT PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION OBSERVATION REPORT JULY 2014 This publication was produced by Democracy International, Inc., for the United States Agency for International Development through Cooperative Agreement No. 3263-A- 13-00002. Photographs in this report were taken by DI while conducting the mission. Democracy International, Inc. 7600 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 1010 Bethesda, MD 20814 Tel: +1.301.961.1660 www.democracyinternational.com EGYPT PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION OBSERVATION REPORT July 2014 Disclaimer This publication is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents are the responsibility of Democracy International, Inc. and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. CONTENTS CONTENTS ................................................................ 4 MAP OF EGYPT .......................................................... I ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................. II DELEGATION MEMBERS ......................................... V ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ....................... X EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.............................................. 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................ 6 ABOUT DI .......................................................... 6 ABOUT THE MISSION ....................................... 7 METHODOLOGY .............................................. 8 BACKGROUND ........................................................ 10 TUMULT
    [Show full text]
  • Political Parties and the Transition to Democracy
    POLITICAL PARTIES AND THE TRANSITION TO DEMOCRACY A Primer in Democratic Party-Building for Leaders, Organizers and Activists The National Democratic Institute for International Affairs (NDI) is a nonprofit organization working to strengthen and expand democracy worldwide. Calling on a global network of volunteer experts, NDI provides practical assistance to civic and political leaders advancing democratic values, practices and institutions. NDI works with democrats in every region of the world to build political and civic organizations, safeguard elections, and promote citizen participation, openness and accountability in government. POLITICAL PARTIES AND THE TRANSITION TO DEMOCRACY A Primer in Democratic Party-Building for Leaders, Organizers and Activists TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface Introduction 2 Section 1: What Makes a Political Party Democratic? 4 Section 2: The Party Constitution 6 Section 3: Party Organization 8 Section 4: Developing a Policy Agenda and Message 13 Section 5: Communication and Outreach 18 Section 6: Membership Recruitment 23 Section 7: Fundraising 27 Section 8: Training 35 Conclusion 39 Appendices 40 A. Constitution of the Progressive Conservative Association of Canada B. Organization and Structure of the Australian Labor Party and the Democratic Party of the Republic of Korea C. Sample newsletter and tips for creating newsletters from the Liberal Democrats of Britain D. Party platforms from the Alliance of Free Democrats of Hungary and the African National Congress of South Africa E. Communication techniques from the Social Democratic and Labour Party of Northern Ireland and a letter to supporters from the Labour Party of Britain F. Information on membership recruitment and activation from the Labour Party of Britain G.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Proceedings
    Second International Meeting on the Implementation of the Declaration of Principles for International Election Observation Summary of Proceedings Organization of American States (OAS) Washington, D.C., November 14-15, 2007 This document reflects the opinions expressed by the international organizations that participated in the Second International Meeting on the Implementation of the Declaration of Principles for International Election Observation. Consequently, the views expressed are exclusively those of the international organizations named herein, and they do not necessarily represent the points of view or the opinions of the OAS, its organs, its staff members, or the OAS Member States. Table of Contents I. Executive Summary II. Proceedings of the Meeting • Panel 1: Sharing Best Practices on Election Observation Criteria Andrew Bruce – Election Desk, External Relations Directorate General, European Commission David Pottie – Associate Director, Democracy Program, The Carter Center Gerardo Munck , Professor and Consultant, General Secretariat of the Organization of American States, Department for Electoral Cooperation and Observation External Discussant : Miriam Lapp , Acting Director, International Research and Cooperation, Elections Canada Moderator: Ms. Rumbidzai Kandawasvika-Nhundu (SADC-PF) • Panel 2: Harmonizing our Approaches to Electronic Technologies in Elections Domenico Tuccinardi – Senior Project Manager ACE Practitioners’ Network, International IDEA Avery Davis-Roberts – Program Associate, Democracy Program, The Carter Center Vladimir Pran – Chief of Party, WestBank/Gaza, IFES Moderator: Mr. Khabele Matlosa (EISA) • Panel 3: Post-Election Follow-up: Translating Observer Recommendations Into Action Robin Ludwig – Political Affairs Officer – United Nations Electoral Affairs Division (UNEAD) Mark Stevens – Advisor and Head, Democracy Section - Commonwealth Secretariat Pat Merloe – Senior Associate and Director of Election Programs, NDI Kingsley Rodrigo – Secretary General, Asian Network for Free Elections (ANFREL) Moderator: Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Democracy Promotion from Bush to Obama
    Working Paper N. 1 US DEMOCRACY PROMOTION FROM BUSH TO OBAMA (EUSPRING) April 2015 WORKING PAPER NO. 1 U.S. Democracy Promotion from Bush to Obama Emiliano Alessandri, Oz Hassan, Ted Reinerti The German Marshall Fund of the United States; the University of Warwick, UK. EUSPRING – WORKING PAPER N. 1 INTRODUCTION Throughout the twenty-first century the United States (U.S.) has attempted to balance its traditional national security interests, whilst also seeking to promote the long-term transformation of the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) towards democracy based on liberal values. With the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks providing a catalyst for policy change, the U.S. has moved away from its twentieth-century policy of pursuing a regional status quo and instinctively balking at political change. Yet, the U.S. has not abandoned its reliance on autocratic regimes that cooperate on more immediate national security interests such as counter-terrorism, counter-proliferation, and the free-flow energy sources into the global market. Rather, U.S. democracy promotion in the MENA has become incremental by design and is characterized by its gradualist and often- collaborative nature. U.S. foreign policy in the MENA is, therefore, depicted by a cautious evolutionary stance rather than supporting revolutionary shifts in power. Whilst the 2003 invasion of Iraq has tarnished public perceptions of “democracy promotion” and the legitimacy of the U.S. projecting its values beyond its shores, there is more substance to democracy promotion than “regime change” and the soaring rhetoric of the G.W. Bush administration’s Freedom Agenda. As a matter of fact, the G.W.
    [Show full text]