DOCSLIB.ORG

Alexandria University Medical Research Institute Department Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Alexandria University Medical Research Institute Department Of Alexandria University Medical Research Institute Student name: ………………………........................……………… Department of Radiation Sciences Semester: Spring Ph.D. in Radiobiology Degree Academic year: 2019/2020 Course title: Assessment of occupational radiation doses Time allowed: 1 hr Course code: 1711807 Date: 20 / 7 / 2020 Final Exam Total marks: 75 marks Question 1: Choose the correct answer (45 marks, 1.5 each, 30 mins) 1. Recommendations regarding dosimetric quantities and units in radiation protection dosimetry are set forth by ……………………………… a. ICRU c. ICRP b. IRPA d. IAEA 2. Ambient and directional dose equivalent link the external radiation field to the ……………………………… a. effective dose c. exposure dose b. radiation weighing factor d. effective dose equivalent 3. The sensitivity is defined as the inverse of the ……………………………… a. Calibration factor c. conversion coefficient b. calibration coefficient d. air kerma in air 4. An example of direct reading dosimeters is ……………………………… a. optically stimulated luminescence detector b. film badge c. Thermo luminescent dosimeter d. electronic personal dosimeter 5. Optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters contain a thin layer of a. phosphate glass c. aluminium oxide b. CaF2:Mn d. LiF:Ti,Mg 6. Personal dosimeters should be calibrated in terms of ……………………………… for individual monitoring of external exposure a. operational quantities c. personal dose equivalent b. directional dose equivalent d. None of the above 7. For individual monitoring, the ……………………………… is used a. directional dose equivalent c. ambient dose equivalent b. personal dose equivalent d. tissue equivalent 8. The relevant depth in the ICRU sphere for strongly penetrating radiation is ……………………………… mm. a. d = 0.07 mm. c. d = 10 mm. b. d = 3 mm. d. none of the above. 9. For weakly penetrating radiation the personal dose equivalent Hp (3) is for the ………………….…… a. soft tissue. c. skin. b. lens of the eye. d. none of the above. Page 1 of 5 10. Radiation weighing factor for electrons equals ……………………………… a. 5 c. 1 b. 5-20 d. 20 11. Proportional detectors belong to the class of ……………………………… a. gas filled detectors c. solid state detectors b. radiophotoluminescent detectors d. semiconductor detectors 12. ……………………………… are the major carriers for n-type semiconductors. a. Electrons c. Atoms b. Holes d. Molecules 13. Present radiation safety standards for occupational exposure to whole body radiation limits an individual’s dose equivalent to ….……………………………. a. 100 mrem/week c. 2000 mrem/year b. 166 mrem/month d. 5000 mrem/year 14. Which of the following diseases can be regarded as a stochastic effect due to ionizing radiation? a. reduction in the number of WBC c. temporary sterility b. leukemia d. permanent sterility 15. Direct Reading Dosimeter operate by measuring the ....................... produced by radiation. a. current c. ionizations b. pulse d. electrons 16. The most important advantage of film dosimeter is …………………………. a. It is inexpensive c. It can be read in-site b. It gives real-time dose measurement d. It can measure neutron dose 17. The most important advantage of the semiconductor detectors, compared to other types of radiation counters, is their superior ……………….. a. efficiency c. energy resolution b. dead time d. signal multiplication 18. Thermal Neutrons are more likely to interact with tissue through …………………. a. Radiative neutron capture c. Inelastic scattering b. Transmutation d. Elastic scattering 19. The opposite figure represents ………………………………….. a. Semiconductor detector b. Two-diode detector c. Multi-diode detector d. MOSFET detector 20. When exposed to neutrons, most physical effects in detectors show a lower efficiency at higher ionization densities owing to ………………………. a. effect of recombination b. greater radiobiological effectiveness c. the protons produced through capture by nitrogen d. the recoil protons from elastic scattering with hydrogen Page 2 of 5 21. It has been estimated that about ………………….. of biological damage caused by low LET radiation is due to indirect action. a. 25% c. 66% b. 50% d. 75% 22. In OSL, ...................... is used to release the trapped energy in the form of luminescence. a. heat b. laser c. optical fiber d. blackening of the film 23. In a semiconductor junction, all interactions with radiation occurs in ................ a. P-type semiconductor c. Reverse bias b. N-type semiconductor d. Depletion region 24. The gas-filled detector that operates in region II is a. Ionization chamber c. Proportional counter b. GM-counter d. Gaseous scintillators 25. A MOSFET devices will respond to energy deposition from all types of charged particle, but with different efficiencies owing to............ a. increased recombination c. accumulating positive space-charge b. decreased recombination d. altering the electrical characteristics 26. ……………….. uses several detectors to extend the detectable range and have greatly enhanced sensitivity. a. Two-diode device c. Diode Array Detectors b. Multi-diode device d. MOSFET detector 27. When radiation is absorbed, ............. is a measure of kinetic energy released per unit mass of absorber. a. absorbed dose c. KERMA b. dose rate d. Effective dose 28. Fast Neutrons are more likely to interact with tissue through …………………. a. Radiative neutron capture c. Inelastic scattering b. Transmutation d. Elastic scattering 29. The opposite figure represents ………………………………….. a. Semiconductor junction b. Semiconductor detector c. MOSFET detector d. Reverse bias 30. The major source of difficulty, for the measurement of neutron dose is that it involves a ……………….. a. radiobiological effectiveness c. recombination or saturation effect b. ionizing radiation d. weighting factor Page 3 of 5 Question no. 2: True or false (20 marks, 1.0 each, 20 mins) 31. Neutron area survey meters operate in the proportional region so that the photon background can be easily discriminated against. ( ) 32. Individual monitoring is the measurement of the radiation doses received by individuals working with radiation. ( ) 33. Holes are the major carriers for n-type semiconductors and electrons are the major carriers for p-type semiconductors. ( ) 34. In badge films, cumulative doses of different radiations are evaluated by measuring the film optical luminescence . ( ) 35. Commercially available RPL dosimeters cover the dose range of 30 mSv to 10 Sv . ( ) 36. RPL dosimeters are very useful in emergency situations for immediate readout of the equivalent doses received. ( ) 37. In insulators, the highest allowed band, called the valence band, is completely occupied. ( ) 38. Optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters are less sensitive than thermoluminescence badges with a lower detection limit of 10–30 mSv. ( ) 39. Personal monitors must have a wide dose range to cover both radiation protection and background monitoring. ( ) 40. Film dosimeters can identify and estimate doses of X rays, ɣ rays, β particles and thermal neutrons. ( ) 41. Exposure to ionizing radiation ultimately cause cancer. ( ) 42. Uncertainty in a measurement in the workplace may significantly increase because the energy spectrum and orientation of the radiation field are generally not well known. ( ) 43. Radiation dosimetry is defined as the measurement of the absorbed dose, or other relevant quantities, which is produced due to the interaction of the ionizing radiation with a material. ( ) 44. Ionizing radiation exerts its indirect effects on biological targets through via radiolysis of cellular water, forming hydroxyl ions. ( ) 45. Personal monitors must have as wide a dose range as possible so that they can cover both radiation protection and accidental situations. ( ) 46. In a Multi-diode Device, there are four surface barrier detectors, three covered with different thickness of 10B, with cadmium shields to absorb incident albedo neutrons and with or without a boron shield on the body side to absorb thermal neutrons. ( ) Page 4 of 5 47. The response of a TLD is dependent upon the dose rate. ( ) 48. External dosimetry is a measure of the KERMA produced from radiation sources, which are outside of the body of the exposed worker. ( ) 49. Neutron weighting factor is variable depending only on the energy of the neutron. ( ) 50. Cells that normally proliferate more rapidly are more sensitive to ionizing radiation. ( ) Question no. 3: Match the two columns (10 marks, 1.0 each, 10 mins) I. Film badge 51 a consists of a small (~1 mm3) chip of carbon doped aluminium oxide. Thermoluminescent Dosimeter 52 b Cannot be reused Optically Stimulated 53 c is a highly insulating silicon dioxide film, Luminescence System on irradiation accumulates positive charge which alters the electrical characteristics of the transistors. Direct Reading Dosimeter 54 d Heating the crystal causes the crystal lattice to vibrate, releasing the trapped electrons in the process. MOSFET Dosimeter 55 e contains a small ionization chamber with a volume of approximately two milliliters. II. Solid State Dosimeter 56 a can be used to detect the charged particles from capture reactions on boron, lithium or nitrogen to cover the albedo region; and protons from elastic scattering on hydrogen for the fast region. Two-diode device 57 b uses several detectors to extend the detectable range to higher neutron energies. Multi-diode device 58 c is a semiconductor detector operating as a microdosimetric counter. An adequate estimation of tissue dose equivalent may be obtained. However, the neutron sensitivity is low. Array Detector 59 d The selection of suitably thin radiator and gate, combined with a detector for subtraction of the photon response, should give a dosimeter of acceptable fast neutron energy dependence. MOSFET Dosimeter 60 e are a group of position sensitive detectors, coupled to a triple dispersive unit. GOOD LUCK Page 5 of 5 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 3 Gamma-Ray Detectors
    3 Gamma-Ray Detectors Hastings A Smith,Jr., and Marcia Lucas S.1 INTRODUCTION In order for a gamma ray to be detected, it must interact with matteu that interaction must be recorded. Fortunately, the electromagnetic nature of gamma-ray photons allows them to interact strongly with the charged electrons in the atoms of all matter. The key process by which a gamma ray is detected is ionization, where it gives up part or all of its energy to an electron. The ionized electrons collide with other atoms and liberate many more electrons. The liberated charge is collected, either directly (as with a proportional counter or a solid-state semiconductor detector) or indirectly (as with a scintillation detector), in order to register the presence of the gamma ray and measure its energy. The final result is an electrical pulse whose voltage is proportional to the energy deposited in the detecting medhtm. In this chapter, we will present some general information on types of’ gamma-ray detectors that are used in nondestructive assay (NDA) of nuclear materials. The elec- tronic instrumentation associated with gamma-ray detection is discussed in Chapter 4. More in-depth treatments of the design and operation of gamma-ray detectors can be found in Refs. 1 and 2. 3.2 TYPES OF DETECTORS Many different detectors have been used to register the gamma ray and its eneqgy. In NDA, it is usually necessary to measure not only the amount of radiation emanating from a sample but also its energy spectrum. Thus, the detectors of most use in NDA applications are those whose signal outputs are proportional to the energy deposited by the gamma ray in the sensitive volume of the detector.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Gamma-Ray Detectors for Nondestructive Analysis P
    1. GAMMA-RAY DETECTORS FOR NONDESTRUCTIVE ANALYSIS P. A. Russo and D. T. Vo I. INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW Gamma rays are used for nondestructive quantitative analysis of nuclear material. Knowledge of both the energy of the gamma ray and its rate of emission from the unknown mass of nuclear material is required to interpret most measurements of nuclear material quantities. Therefore, detection of gamma rays for nondestructive analysis of nuclear materials requires both spectroscopy capability and knowledge of absolute specific detector response. Some techniques nondestructively quantify attributes other than nuclear material mass, but all rely on the ability to distinguish elements or isotopes and measure the relative or absolute yields of their corresponding radiation signatures. All require spectroscopy and most require high resolution. Therefore, detection of gamma rays for quantitative nondestructive analysis (NDA) of the mass or of other attributes of nuclear materials requires spectroscopy. A previous book on gamma-ray detectors for NDA1 provided generic descriptions of three detector categories: inorganic scintillation detectors, semiconductor detectors, and gas-filled detectors. This report described relevant detector properties, corresponding spectral characteristics, and guidelines for choosing detectors for NDA. The current report focuses on significant new advances in detector technology in these categories. Emphasis here is given to those detectors that have been developed at least to the stage of commercial prototypes. The type of NDA application – fixed installation in a count room, portable measurements, or fixed installation in a processing line or other active facility (storage, shipping/receiving, etc.) – influences the choice of an appropriate detector. Some prototype gamma-ray detection techniques applied to new NDA approaches may revolutionize how nuclear materials are quantified in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • DRC-2016-012921.Pdf
    CLN-SRT-011 R1.0 Page 2 of 33 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 3 Sources of Radiation .................................................................................................................. 3 Radiation: Particle vs Electromagnetic ....................................................................................... 5 Ionizing and non- ionizing radiation ............................................................................................ 8 Radioactive Decay ....................................................................................................................10 Interaction of Radiation with Matter ...........................................................................................15 Radiation Detection and Measurement .....................................................................................17 Biological Effects of Radiation ...................................................................................................18 Radiation quantities and units ...................................................................................................18 Biological effects .......................................................................................................................20 Effects of Radiation by Biological Organization .........................................................................20 Mechanisms of biological damage ............................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Portable Front-End Readout System for Radiation Detection
    Portable Front-End Readout System for Radiation Detection by Maris Tali THESIS for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE (Master in Electronics) Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences University of Oslo June 2015 Det matematisk- naturvitenskapelige fakultet Universitetet i Oslo Portable Front-End Readout System for Radiation Detection Maris Tali Portable Front-End Readout System for Radiation Detection Maris Tali Portable Front-End Readout System for Radiation Detection Acknowledgements First of all, I would like to thank my advisor, Ketil Røed, for giving me the opportunity to write my master thesis on such an interesting and challenging subject as radiation instrumentation and measurement. I would also like to thank him for his insight and guidance during my master thesis and for the exciting opportunities during my studies to work in a real experimental environment. I would also like to thank the Electronic Laboratory of the University of Oslo, specif- ically Halvor Strøm, David Bang and Stein Nielsen who all gave me valuable advice and assistance and without whom this master thesis could not have been finished. Lastly, I would like to thank the co-designer of the system whom I worked together with during my master thesis, Eino J. Oltedal. It is customary to write that half of ones master thesis belongs to ones partner. However, this is actually the case in this instance so I guess 2/3 of my master thesis is yours and I definitely could not have done this without you. So, thank you very much! Oslo, June 2015 Maris Tali I Maris Tali Portable Front-End Readout System for Radiation Detection Contents Acknowledgments I Glossary VI List of Figures X List of Tables X Abstract XI 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background and motivation .
    [Show full text]
  • Semiconductor Detectors Silvia Masciocchi GSI Darmstadt and University of Heidelberg
    Semiconductor detectors Silvia Masciocchi GSI Darmstadt and University of Heidelberg 39th Heidelberg Physics Graduate Days, HGSFP Heidelberg October 10, 2017 Semiconductor detector: basics IONIZATION as in gas detectors → Now in semiconductors = solid materials with crystalline structure (Si, Ge, GaAs) → electron-hole pairs (instead of electron-ion) + use microchip technology: structures with few micrometer precision can be produced at low cost. Read-out electronics can be directly bonded to the detectors + only a few eV per electron-hole pair → 10 times more charge produced (wrt gas) → better energy resolution + high density compared to gases → need only thin layers (greater stopping power) – apart from silicon, the detectors need to be cooled (cryogenics) – crystal lattices → radiation damage [email protected] Semiconductor detectors, October 11, 2017 2 Applications Main applications: ● γ spectroscopy with high energy resolution ● Energy measurement of charged particles (few MeV) and particle identification (PID) via dE/dx (multiple layers needed) ● Very high spatial resolution for tracking and vertexing A few dates: 1930s – very first crystal detectors 1950s – first serious developments of particle detectors 1960s – energy measurement devices in commerce [email protected] Semiconductor detectors, October 11, 2017 3 Semiconductor detectors: outline ● Principle of operation of semiconductor detectors ● Properties of semiconductors (band structure) ● Intrinsic material ● Extrinsic (doped) semiconductors ● p-n junction ● Signal generation ● Energy measurement with semiconductor detectors ● Position measurement with semiconductor detectors ● Radiation damage [email protected] Semiconductor detectors, October 11, 2017 4 Principle of operation ● Detector operates as a solid state ionization chamber ● Charged particles create electron-hole pairs ● Place the crystal between two electrodes that set up an electric field → charge carriers drift and induce a signal ● Less than 1/3 of energy deposited goes into ionization.
    [Show full text]
  • Internal and External Exposure Exposure Routes 2.1
    Exposure Routes Internal and External Exposure Exposure Routes 2.1 External exposure Internal exposure Body surface From outer space contamination and the sun Inhalation Suspended matters Food and drink consumption From a radiation Lungs generator Radio‐ pharmaceuticals Wound Buildings Ground Radiation coming from outside the body Radiation emitted within the body Radioactive The body is equally exposed to radiation in both cases. materials "Radiation exposure" refers to the situation where the body is in the presence of radiation. There are two types of radiation exposure, "internal exposure" and "external exposure." External exposure means to receive radiation that comes from radioactive materials existing on the ground, suspended in the air, or attached to clothes or the surface of the body (p.25 of Vol. 1, "External Exposure and Skin"). Conversely, internal exposure is caused (i) when a person has a meal and takes in radioactive materials in the food or drink (ingestion); (ii) when a person breathes in radioactive materials in the air (inhalation); (iii) when radioactive materials are absorbed through the skin (percutaneous absorption); (iv) when radioactive materials enter the body from a wound (wound contamination); and (v) when radiopharmaceuticals containing radioactive materials are administered for the purpose of medical treatment. Once radioactive materials enter the body, the body will continue to be exposed to radiation until the radioactive materials are excreted in the urine or feces (biological half-life) or as the radioactivity weakens over time (p.26 of Vol. 1, "Internal Exposure"). The difference between internal exposure and external exposure lies in whether the source that emits radiation is inside or outside the body.
    [Show full text]
  • A Direct Search for Dark Matter with the Majorana Demonstrator
    A DIRECT SEARCH FOR DARK MATTER WITH THE MAJORANA DEMONSTRATOR Kristopher Reidar Vorren A dissertation submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Physics. Chapel Hill 2017 Approved by: Reyco Henning Chris Clemens Jonathan Engel Christian Iliadis John F. Wilkerson c 2017 Kristopher Reidar Vorren ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Kristopher Reidar Vorren: A Direct Search for Dark Matter with the Majorana Demonstrator (Under the direction of Reyco Henning) The Majorana Demonstrator is a neutrinoless double-beta decay experiment cur- rently operating 4850 ft underground in the Sanford Underground Research Facility in Lead, SD. Sub-keV thresholds and excellent low-energy resolution are features of the p-type point- contact high-purity germanium detectors deployed by Majorana, making them ideal for use in direct dark matter searches when combined with Majorana's ultra-low backgrounds. An analysis of data from a 2015 commissioning run of the Demonstrator with 478 kg d of exposure was performed to search for mono-energetic lines in the detectors' energy-spectrum from bosonic dark matter absorption. No dark matter signature was found in the 5-100 keV range, and upper limits were placed on dark bosonic pseudoscalar and vector-electric cou- plings. The same analysis produced null results and upper limits for three additional rare- event searches: Pauli-Exclusion Principle violating decay, solar axions, and electron decay. Improvements made to Majorana since commissioning will result in increased sensitivity to rare-event searches in future analyses.
    [Show full text]
  • Semiconductor Detectors Part 1
    1 Lectures on Detector Techniques Stanford Linear Accelerator Center September 1998 – February, 1999 Semiconductor Detectors Part 1 Helmuth Spieler Physics Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory for more details see UC Berkeley Physics 198 course notes at http://www-physics.lbl.gov/~spieler Semiconductor Detectors Helmuth Spieler SLUO Lectures on Detector Techniques, October 23, 1998 LBNL 2 1. Principles Important excitations when radiation is absorbed in solids 1. atomic electrons ⇒ mobile charge carriers ⇒ lattice excitations (phonons) 2. elastic scattering on nuclei Recoil energy < order 10 eV ⇒ ionization ⇒ lattice excitations (phonons) at higher recoil energies ⇒ radiation damage (displacement of from lattice sites) Semiconductor Detectors Helmuth Spieler SLUO Lectures on Detector Techniques, October 23, 1998 LBNL 3 Most Semiconductor Detectors are Ionization Chambers Detection volume with electric field Energy deposited → positive and negative charge pairs Charges move in field → current in external circuit (continuity equation) Semiconductor Detectors Helmuth Spieler SLUO Lectures on Detector Techniques, October 23, 1998 LBNL 4 Ionization chambers can be made with any medium that allows charge collection to a pair of electrodes. Medium can be gas liquid solid Crude comparison of relevant properties gas liquid solid density low moderate high atomic number Z low moderate moderate ionization energy εi moderate moderate low signal speed moderate moderate fast Desirable properties: low ionization energy ⇒ 1. increased charge
    [Show full text]
  • Semiconductor Detectors - an Introduction
    Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Title SEMICONDUCTOR DETECTORS - AN INTRODUCTION Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8vn2v63q Author Goulding, F.S. Publication Date 1978-04-01 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California NOTICE 1 Tkk itfon Ml ptepued w an account of work •pouored by (he United Sum Government. Nrtthei the United Sutei not ft* United SUM Deptflment of SEMICONDUCTOR DETECTORS - AN INTRODUCTION* Eneigy, nor My of theft emptoytti, nor my of iheti LBL-7282 eantnclon, nibcoatricfon, o.- their employee], tukei •ny wtmnty, tiprtn or (replied, or utiana any lefaJ F. S. Goulding Ikbfliiy oi raponrtffity foi <heKcuncy,cttii|4ctene(( Of lacfulncM o( any information, apparatus, product or Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory piODcm dfcetaed, o( reprMenb thil !u tnr would not University of California infrinfc primely owned dtfiw. Berkeley, California 94720 I. History (i) To first order charge collection in a detector only occurs from regions where an electric Semiconductor detectors appeared on the scene' of field exists. Diffusion does occur from Nuclear Physics in about I960, although McKay of Bell field-free regions, but it is slow and its Laboratories had demonstrated the detection of alpha effects are usually undesirable. In junction particles by semiconductor diodes several years or surface-barrier (sometimes called Schottky- earlier. The earliest work, just prior to 1960, barrler) detectors, this means that the "de­ focused on relatively thin surface barrier germanium pletion layer" is the sensitive region of a detectors, used to detect short-range particles. detector. These detectors, used at low temperature to reduce leakage current, demonstrated the potential of semi­ (11) The thickness of a depletion layer 1 a semi­ conductor detectors to realize energy resolutions conductor diode is proportional to substantially better than the ionization (gas) chambers used earlier.
    [Show full text]
  • Semiconductor Pixel Detectors for Characterisation of Therapeutic Proton Beams
    AGH University of Science and Technology Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science Engineering thesis Semiconductor pixel detectors for characterisation of therapeutic proton beams Paulina Stasica Medical Physics Supervisor: dr inż. Jan Gajewski Proton Radiotherapy Group The Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences Kraków, January 2020 dr inż. Jan Gajewski Instytut Fizyki Jądrowej PAN Merytoryczna ocena pracy przez opiekuna: Pani Paulina Stasica przygotowała pracę inżynierską, która jest elementem projektu ba- dawczego Fundacji na Rzecz Nauki Polskiej zatytułowanego „Ocena niepewności zasięgu efektu biologicznego w celu poprawy skuteczności radioterapii protonowej w Centrum Cyklotronowym Bronowic”, realizowanego w Instytucie Fizyki Jądrowej PAN w Krakowie. Praca inżynierska podzielona jest na trzy części: wstęp teoretyczny, część opisującą zasto- sowane metody eksperymentalne oraz wyniki i dyskusję pomiarów i symulacji Monte Carlo. Pracę kończy rozdział z wnioskami. We wstępie teoretycznym zostały opisane formy oddziaływań wysokoenergetycznych pro- tonów z materią oraz podstawy radioterapii protonowej, w tym rola względnej wydajności biologicznej i jej zależność od liniowego przekazu energii. W kolejnym rozdziale opisano zastosowanie półprzewodnikowych detektorów pikselowych typu Timepix MiniPIX do pomiaru depozycji energii w mieszanych polach promieniowania indukowanych przez wiązkę protonową. Opisano dwa typy eksperymentów przeprowadzonych przez Autorkę pracy, mających na celu zbadanie zdolności
    [Show full text]
  • Radiation Dosimetry in Cases of Normal and Emergency Situations
    Radiation Dosimetry in Cases of Normal and Emergency Situations A Thesis Submitted to Department of Physics Faculty of Science, Al Azhar University for The Degree of PhD. in Physics by Tarek Mahmoud Morsi M.Sc. (Physics, 2003) Radiation Protection Department, Nuclear Research Center, Atomic Energy Authority Under Supervision Emeritus Prof. M. I. El Gohary Emeritus Prof. M. A. Gomaa Prof. of Biophysics Prof. of Radiation Physics Al Azhar University Atomic Energy Authority Emeritus Prof. Samia M. Rashad Emeritus Dr. Eid M. Ali Prof. of Radiation Emergencies Lecturer of Radiation Physics Atomic Energy Authority Atomic Energy Authority 2010 Approval Sheet for Submission Ti tle of the PhD. Thesis Radiation Dosimetry in Cases of Normal and Emergency Situations Name of the Candidate Tarek Mahmoud Morsi Atomic Energy Authority This thesis has been approved for submission by the supervisors : Emeritus Prof. M. I. El Gohary Emeritus Prof. M. A. Gomaa Prof. of Biophysics Prof. of Radiation Physics Al Azhar University Atomic Energy Authority Emeritus Prof. Samia M. Rashad Emeritus Dr. Eid M. Ali Prof. of Radiation Emergencies Lecturer of Radiation Physics Atomic Energy Authority Atomic Energy Authority Acknowledgement First and above all, all thanks to ALLAH the Merciful, the Compassionate without his help. I couldn't finish this work. I wish to express my sincere thanks and gratitude to Professor Dr. Mohamed I. EL-Gohary, Prof. of Biophysics, faculty of science, Al- Azhar University and Professor Dr. Mohamed A. Gomaa, Prof. of Radiation Physics, Atomic Energy Authority (A.E.A) for their kind supervision, continuous encouragement and helps during the course of this work.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture Notes
    Fortieth Training Course on Safety and Regulatory Measures for BARC Facilities February 26-29, 2020 Anushaktinagar, Mumbai Lecture Notes BARC SAFETY COUNCIL SECRETARIAT BARC SAFETY FRAMEWORK Competent Authority Director, BARC BARC Safety Council BARC Safety Council -Specific Facilities Safety Committees for (BSC) (BSC-SF) Specific Facilities DSRCs & SRCs PPSRC OPSRC CFSRC CRAASDRW 1. DSRC-AP: Accelerator Projects Physical Protection System Operating Plants Safety Conventional and Fire Committee to Review Application for 2. DSRC -CFB: Common Facility Building Review Committee Review Committee Safety Review Committee Authorisation of Safe Disposal of 3. DSRC-CFV: Conventional Facilities, Vizag Radioactive Waste 4. DSRC-HFRR: High Flux Research ULSCs Reactor 1. MOSC: Metallurgical ULSCs 5. DSRC-IPF: I-131 Processing Facility All ULSCS Operations SC 1. ULSC-AG 6. DSRC-NRFN: Nuclear Reactor Facility- 2. ULSC-RO Radiological 2. ULSC-CEO All ULSCS North Site Operations) 3. ULSC-CFS Kalpakkam 7. DSRC -NRB: Nuclear Recycle Board 3. ULSC-RR (Research 4. ULSC-CFS Tarapur 8. DSRC-NRG: Nuclear Recycle Group Reactors) 5. ULSC-CFS Vizag Expert Committees 9. DSRC -RMRC: Radiation Medicine 4. ULSC-NRB-Kalpakkam 6. ULSC-ESG 1. ACOH: Advisory Committee on Research Centre, Kolkata 5. ULSC-NRB-Tarapur 7. ULSC-Med: Medical Occupational Health 10. DSRC -SNRF: Safe-guarded Nuclear 6. ULSC-NRG 8. ULSC-ML: Mod Lab 2. CRLRSO: Committee to Recycle Facility 7. ULSC-PA (Particle 9. ULSC-RDDG Recommend Licensing of 11. SRC-LNTC: Live Nuclear Training Accelerators) Radiological Safety Officers Complex, CME, Pune 3. DAC: Standing Committee on 12. SRC- NC: New Constructions Expert Committees Dose Apportionment Expert Committees 1.
    [Show full text]