DOCSLIB.ORG

Calculus II Series - Things to Consider

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Calculus II Series - Things to Consider Calculus II Series - Things to Consider Important: This cheat sheet is not intended to be a list of guaranteed rules to follow. This intro- duces some hints and some ideas you may consider when choosing tests for convergence or divergence when evaluating a given series. It is usually a good idea to try using the Test for Divergence as a first step when evaluating a series for convergence or divergence. If we can show that: lim an 6= 0 n!1 Then we can say that the series diverges without having to do any extra work. Below are some general cases in which each test may help: P-Series Test: P 1 • The series be written in the form: np Geometric Series Test: P n−1 P n • When the series can be written in the form: anr or anr Direct Comparison Test: • When the given series, an looks like a known, or more simple, series, bn Limit Comparison Test: • When you can see that the series looks like another convergent or divergent series, bn • But it is hard to say whether bn > an or bn < an Root Test: P n • When the series can be written in the form: (an) Alternating Series Test: P n+1 P n • When the series can be written in the form: (−1) an or (−1) an Ratio Test: • Whenever we are given something involving a factorial, e.g. n! th P n+5 • Whenever we are given something involving a constant raised to the n power, e.g. 5n Integral Test: • If the sequence is: { continuous { positive { decreasing (we can use the First Derivative Test here) csusm.edu/stemsc xxx @csusm_stemcenter Tel: North: 760-750-4101 South: 760-750-7324 Calculus II Series - Things to Consider Remember: These are just suggestions. There are other tests which may get us to the same answer. Convergent Divergent Test for Test for Divergence 1 1 Divergence X n2 − 1 X 1 lim an 6= 0 lim an 6= 0 n!1 n2 + n 1 n!1 n=1 n=1 P-Series 1 15 1 (−3)n+1 P-Series Test X X Test 3n3 23n n=1 n=1 1 1 Geometric X (−3)n+1 X n2 − 1 Geometric Series Test Series Test 23n n2 + n n=1 n=1 Direct Direct 1 1 Comparison X tan−1(n) X n2 − 1 Comparison Test p Test n n n2 + n n=1 n=1 Test for Test for Limit Divergence 1 1 2 Divergence Limit Comparison Fails X 1 X n − 1 Fails Comparison Test 2 3 Test lim an = 0 n + n n + 4 lim an = 0 n!1 n=1 n=1 n!1 1 n 1 n Root Test X 3n X (n!) Root Test 1 + 8n n4n n=1 n=1 1 1 Alternating X n2 − 1 X 1 Alternating (−1)n (−1)n Series Test n2 + n 1 Series Test n=1 n=1 1 1 X 2nn! X 1 Ratio Test Ratio Test (n + 2)! 1 n=1 n=1 1 1 1 1 X e n X Integral Test Integral Test n2 1 n=1 n=1 csusm.edu/stemsc xxx @csusm_stemcenter Tel: North: 760-750-4101 South: 760-750-7324.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Calculus and Differential Equations II
    Calculus and Differential Equations II MATH 250 B Sequences and series Sequences and series Calculus and Differential Equations II Sequences A sequence is an infinite list of numbers, s1; s2;:::; sn;::: , indexed by integers. 1n Example 1: Find the first five terms of s = (−1)n , n 3 n ≥ 1. Example 2: Find a formula for sn, n ≥ 1, given that its first five terms are 0; 2; 6; 14; 30. Some sequences are defined recursively. For instance, sn = 2 sn−1 + 3, n > 1, with s1 = 1. If lim sn = L, where L is a number, we say that the sequence n!1 (sn) converges to L. If such a limit does not exist or if L = ±∞, one says that the sequence diverges. Sequences and series Calculus and Differential Equations II Sequences (continued) 2n Example 3: Does the sequence converge? 5n 1 Yes 2 No n 5 Example 4: Does the sequence + converge? 2 n 1 Yes 2 No sin(2n) Example 5: Does the sequence converge? n Remarks: 1 A convergent sequence is bounded, i.e. one can find two numbers M and N such that M < sn < N, for all n's. 2 If a sequence is bounded and monotone, then it converges. Sequences and series Calculus and Differential Equations II Series A series is a pair of sequences, (Sn) and (un) such that n X Sn = uk : k=1 A geometric series is of the form 2 3 n−1 k−1 Sn = a + ax + ax + ax + ··· + ax ; uk = ax 1 − xn One can show that if x 6= 1, S = a .
    [Show full text]
  • Math 142 – Quiz 6 – Solutions 1. (A) by Direct Calculation, Lim 1+3N 2
    Math 142 – Quiz 6 – Solutions 1. (a) By direct calculation, 1 + 3n 1 + 3 0 + 3 3 lim = lim n = = − . n→∞ n→∞ 2 2 − 5n n − 5 0 − 5 5 3 So it is convergent with limit − 5 . (b) By using f(x), where an = f(n), x2 2x 2 lim = lim = lim = 0. x→∞ ex x→∞ ex x→∞ ex (Obtained using L’Hˆopital’s Rule twice). Thus the sequence is convergent with limit 0. (c) By comparison, n − 1 n + cos(n) n − 1 ≤ ≤ 1 and lim = 1 n + 1 n + 1 n→∞ n + 1 n n+cos(n) o so by the Squeeze Theorem, the sequence n+1 converges to 1. 2. (a) By the Ratio Test (or as a geometric series), 32n+2 32n 3232n 7n 9 L = lim (16 )/(16 ) = lim = . n→∞ 7n+1 7n n→∞ 32n 7 7n 7 The ratio is bigger than 1, so the series is divergent. Can also show using the Divergence Test since limn→∞ an = ∞. (b) By the integral test Z ∞ Z t 1 1 t dx = lim dx = lim ln(ln x)|2 = lim ln(ln t) − ln(ln 2) = ∞. 2 x ln x t→∞ 2 x ln x t→∞ t→∞ So the integral diverges and thus by the Integral Test, the series also diverges. (c) By comparison, (n3 − 3n + 1)/(n5 + 2n3) n5 − 3n3 + n2 1 − 3n−2 + n−3 lim = lim = lim = 1. n→∞ 1/n2 n→∞ n5 + 2n3 n→∞ 1 + 2n−2 Since P 1/n2 converges (p-series, p = 2 > 1), by the Limit Comparison Test, the series converges.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Mean Value Theorem 1 1.1 Applications of the Mean Value Theorem
    Seunghee Ye Ma 8: Week 5 Oct 28 Week 5 Summary In Section 1, we go over the Mean Value Theorem and its applications. In Section 2, we will recap what we have covered so far this term. Topics Page 1 Mean Value Theorem 1 1.1 Applications of the Mean Value Theorem . .1 2 Midterm Review 5 2.1 Proof Techniques . .5 2.2 Sequences . .6 2.3 Series . .7 2.4 Continuity and Differentiability of Functions . .9 1 Mean Value Theorem The Mean Value Theorem is the following result: Theorem 1.1 (Mean Value Theorem). Let f be a continuous function on [a; b], which is differentiable on (a; b). Then, there exists some value c 2 (a; b) such that f(b) − f(a) f 0(c) = b − a Intuitively, the Mean Value Theorem is quite trivial. Say we want to drive to San Francisco, which is 380 miles from Caltech according to Google Map. If we start driving at 8am and arrive at 12pm, we know that we were driving over the speed limit at least once during the drive. This is exactly what the Mean Value Theorem tells us. Since the distance travelled is a continuous function of time, we know that there is a point in time when our speed was ≥ 380=4 >>> speed limit. As we can see from this example, the Mean Value Theorem is usually not a tough theorem to understand. The tricky thing is realizing when you should try to use it. Roughly speaking, we use the Mean Value Theorem when we want to turn the information about a function into information about its derivative, or vice-versa.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.3 Convergence Tests for Infinite Series
    3.3 Convergence Tests for Infinite Series 3.3.1 The integral test We may plot the sequence an in the Cartesian plane, with independent variable n and dependent variable a: n X The sum an can then be represented geometrically as the area of a collection of rectangles with n=1 height an and width 1. This geometric viewpoint suggests that we compare this sum to an integral. If an can be represented as a continuous function of n, for real numbers n, not just integers, and if the m X sequence an is decreasing, then an looks a bit like area under the curve a = a(n). n=1 In particular, m m+2 X Z m+1 X an > an dn > an n=1 n=1 n=2 For example, let us examine the first 10 terms of the harmonic series 10 X 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 = 1 + + + + + + + + + : n 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 1 1 If we draw the curve y = x (or a = n ) we see that 10 11 10 X 1 Z 11 dx X 1 X 1 1 > > = − 1 + : n x n n 11 1 1 2 1 (See Figure 1, copied from Wikipedia) Z 11 dx Now = ln(11) − ln(1) = ln(11) so 1 x 10 X 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 = 1 + + + + + + + + + > ln(11) n 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 and 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 + + + + + + + + + < ln(11) + (1 − ): 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Z dx So we may bound our series, above and below, with some version of the integral : x If we allow the sum to turn into an infinite series, we turn the integral into an improper integral.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mean Value Theorem Math 120 Calculus I Fall 2015
    The Mean Value Theorem Math 120 Calculus I Fall 2015 The central theorem to much of differential calculus is the Mean Value Theorem, which we'll abbreviate MVT. It is the theoretical tool used to study the first and second derivatives. There is a nice logical sequence of connections here. It starts with the Extreme Value Theorem (EVT) that we looked at earlier when we studied the concept of continuity. It says that any function that is continuous on a closed interval takes on a maximum and a minimum value. A technical lemma. We begin our study with a technical lemma that allows us to relate 0 the derivative of a function at a point to values of the function nearby. Specifically, if f (x0) is positive, then for x nearby but smaller than x0 the values f(x) will be less than f(x0), but for x nearby but larger than x0, the values of f(x) will be larger than f(x0). This says something like f is an increasing function near x0, but not quite. An analogous statement 0 holds when f (x0) is negative. Proof. The proof of this lemma involves the definition of derivative and the definition of limits, but none of the proofs for the rest of the theorems here require that depth. 0 Suppose that f (x0) = p, some positive number. That means that f(x) − f(x ) lim 0 = p: x!x0 x − x0 f(x) − f(x0) So you can make arbitrarily close to p by taking x sufficiently close to x0.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is on Today 1 Alternating Series
    MA 124 (Calculus II) Lecture 17: March 28, 2019 Section A3 Professor Jennifer Balakrishnan, [email protected] What is on today 1 Alternating series1 1 Alternating series Briggs-Cochran-Gillett x8:6 pp. 649 - 656 We begin by reviewing the Alternating Series Test: P k+1 Theorem 1 (Alternating Series Test). The alternating series (−1) ak converges if 1. the terms of the series are nonincreasing in magnitude (0 < ak+1 ≤ ak, for k greater than some index N) and 2. limk!1 ak = 0. For series of positive terms, limk!1 ak = 0 does NOT imply convergence. For alter- nating series with nonincreasing terms, limk!1 ak = 0 DOES imply convergence. Example 2 (x8.6 Ex 16, 20, 24). Determine whether the following series converge. P1 (−1)k 1. k=0 k2+10 P1 1 k 2. k=0 − 5 P1 (−1)k 3. k=2 k ln2 k 1 MA 124 (Calculus II) Lecture 17: March 28, 2019 Section A3 Recall that if a series converges to a value S, then the remainder is Rn = S − Sn, where Sn is the sum of the first n terms of the series. An upper bound on the magnitude of the remainder (the absolute error) in an alternating series arises form the following observation: when the terms are nonincreasing in magnitude, the value of the series is always trapped between successive terms of the sequence of partial sums. Thus we have jRnj = jS − Snj ≤ jSn+1 − Snj = an+1: This justifies the following theorem: P1 k+1 Theorem 3 (Remainder in Alternating Series).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Approximating Integrals Using Taylor Polynomials 1 1.1 Definitions
    Seunghee Ye Ma 8: Week 7 Nov 10 Week 7 Summary This week, we will learn how we can approximate integrals using Taylor series and numerical methods. Topics Page 1 Approximating Integrals using Taylor Polynomials 1 1.1 Definitions . .1 1.2 Examples . .2 1.3 Approximating Integrals . .3 2 Numerical Integration 5 1 Approximating Integrals using Taylor Polynomials 1.1 Definitions When we first defined the derivative, recall that it was supposed to be the \instantaneous rate of change" of a function f(x) at a given point c. In other words, f 0 gives us a linear approximation of f(x) near c: for small values of " 2 R, we have f(c + ") ≈ f(c) + "f 0(c) But if f(x) has higher order derivatives, why stop with a linear approximation? Taylor series take this idea of linear approximation and extends it to higher order derivatives, giving us a better approximation of f(x) near c. Definition (Taylor Polynomial and Taylor Series) Let f(x) be a Cn function i.e. f is n-times continuously differentiable. Then, the n-th order Taylor polynomial of f(x) about c is: n X f (k)(c) T (f)(x) = (x − c)k n k! k=0 The n-th order remainder of f(x) is: Rn(f)(x) = f(x) − Tn(f)(x) If f(x) is C1, then the Taylor series of f(x) about c is: 1 X f (k)(c) T (f)(x) = (x − c)k 1 k! k=0 Note that the first order Taylor polynomial of f(x) is precisely the linear approximation we wrote down in the beginning.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Improper Integrals
    July 14, 2019 MAT136 { Week 6 Justin Ko 1 Improper Integrals In this section, we will introduce the notion of integrals over intervals of infinite length or integrals of functions with an infinite discontinuity. These definite integrals are called improper integrals, and are understood as the limits of the integrals we introduced in Week 1. Definition 1. We define two types of improper integrals: 1. Infinite Region: If f is continuous on [a; 1) or (−∞; b], the integral over an infinite domain is defined as the respective limit of integrals over finite intervals, Z 1 Z t Z b Z b f(x) dx = lim f(x) dx; f(x) dx = lim f(x) dx: a t!1 a −∞ t→−∞ t R 1 R a If both a f(x) dx < 1 and −∞ f(x) dx < 1, then Z 1 Z a Z 1 f(x) dx = f(x) dx + f(x) dx: −∞ −∞ a R 1 If one of the limits do not exist or is infinite, then −∞ f(x) dx diverges. 2. Infinite Discontinuity: If f is continuous on [a; b) or (a; b], the improper integral for a discon- tinuous function is defined as the respective limit of integrals over finite intervals, Z b Z t Z b Z b f(x) dx = lim f(x) dx f(x) dx = lim f(x) dx: a t!b− a a t!a+ t R c R b If f has a discontinuity at c 2 (a; b) and both a f(x) dx < 1 and c f(x) dx < 1, then Z b Z c Z b f(x) dx = f(x) dx + f(x) dx: a a c R b If one of the limits do not exist or is infinite, then a f(x) dx diverges.
    [Show full text]
  • Series: Convergence and Divergence Comparison Tests
    Series: Convergence and Divergence Here is a compilation of what we have done so far (up to the end of October) in terms of convergence and divergence. • Series that we know about: P∞ n Geometric Series: A geometric series is a series of the form n=0 ar . The series converges if |r| < 1 and 1 a1 diverges otherwise . If |r| < 1, the sum of the entire series is 1−r where a is the first term of the series and r is the common ratio. P∞ 1 2 p-Series Test: The series n=1 np converges if p1 and diverges otherwise . P∞ • Nth Term Test for Divergence: If limn→∞ an 6= 0, then the series n=1 an diverges. Note: If limn→∞ an = 0 we know nothing. It is possible that the series converges but it is possible that the series diverges. Comparison Tests: P∞ • Direct Comparison Test: If a series n=1 an has all positive terms, and all of its terms are eventually bigger than those in a series that is known to be divergent, then it is also divergent. The reverse is also true–if all the terms are eventually smaller than those of some convergent series, then the series is convergent. P P P That is, if an, bn and cn are all series with positive terms and an ≤ bn ≤ cn for all n sufficiently large, then P P if cn converges, then bn does as well P P if an diverges, then bn does as well. (This is a good test to use with rational functions.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 9 Optimization: One Choice Variable
    RS - Ch 9 - Optimization: One Variable Chapter 9 Optimization: One Choice Variable 1 Léon Walras (1834-1910) Vilfredo Federico D. Pareto (1848–1923) 9.1 Optimum Values and Extreme Values • Goal vs. non-goal equilibrium • In the optimization process, we need to identify the objective function to optimize. • In the objective function the dependent variable represents the object of maximization or minimization Example: - Define profit function: = PQ − C(Q) - Objective: Maximize - Tool: Q 2 1 RS - Ch 9 - Optimization: One Variable 9.2 Relative Maximum and Minimum: First- Derivative Test Critical Value The critical value of x is the value x0 if f ′(x0)= 0. • A stationary value of y is f(x0). • A stationary point is the point with coordinates x0 and f(x0). • A stationary point is coordinate of the extremum. • Theorem (Weierstrass) Let f : S→R be a real-valued function defined on a compact (bounded and closed) set S ∈ Rn. If f is continuous on S, then f attains its maximum and minimum values on S. That is, there exists a point c1 and c2 such that f (c1) ≤ f (x) ≤ f (c2) ∀x ∈ S. 3 9.2 First-derivative test •The first-order condition (f.o.c.) or necessary condition for extrema is that f '(x*) = 0 and the value of f(x*) is: • A relative minimum if f '(x*) changes its sign y from negative to positive from the B immediate left of x0 to its immediate right. f '(x*)=0 (first derivative test of min.) x x* y • A relative maximum if the derivative f '(x) A f '(x*) = 0 changes its sign from positive to negative from the immediate left of the point x* to its immediate right.
    [Show full text]
  • A Quotient Rule Integration by Parts Formula Jennifer Switkes ([email protected]), California State Polytechnic Univer- Sity, Pomona, CA 91768
    A Quotient Rule Integration by Parts Formula Jennifer Switkes ([email protected]), California State Polytechnic Univer- sity, Pomona, CA 91768 In a recent calculus course, I introduced the technique of Integration by Parts as an integration rule corresponding to the Product Rule for differentiation. I showed my students the standard derivation of the Integration by Parts formula as presented in [1]: By the Product Rule, if f (x) and g(x) are differentiable functions, then d f (x)g(x) = f (x)g(x) + g(x) f (x). dx Integrating on both sides of this equation, f (x)g(x) + g(x) f (x) dx = f (x)g(x), which may be rearranged to obtain f (x)g(x) dx = f (x)g(x) − g(x) f (x) dx. Letting U = f (x) and V = g(x) and observing that dU = f (x) dx and dV = g(x) dx, we obtain the familiar Integration by Parts formula UdV= UV − VdU. (1) My student Victor asked if we could do a similar thing with the Quotient Rule. While the other students thought this was a crazy idea, I was intrigued. Below, I derive a Quotient Rule Integration by Parts formula, apply the resulting integration formula to an example, and discuss reasons why this formula does not appear in calculus texts. By the Quotient Rule, if f (x) and g(x) are differentiable functions, then ( ) ( ) ( ) − ( ) ( ) d f x = g x f x f x g x . dx g(x) [g(x)]2 Integrating both sides of this equation, we get f (x) g(x) f (x) − f (x)g(x) = dx.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Points and Classifying Local Maxima and Minima Don Byrd, Rev
    Notes on Textbook Section 4.1 Critical Points and Classifying Local Maxima and Minima Don Byrd, rev. 25 Oct. 2011 To find and classify critical points of a function f (x) First steps: 1. Take the derivative f ’(x) . 2. Find the critical points by setting f ’ equal to 0, and solving for x . To finish the job, use either the first derivative test or the second derivative test. Via First Derivative Test 3. Determine if f ’ is positive (so f is increasing) or negative (so f is decreasing) on both sides of each critical point. • Note that since all that matters is the sign, you can check any value on the side you want; so use values that make it easy! • Optional, but helpful in more complex situations: draw a sign diagram. For example, say we have critical points at 11/8 and 22/7. It’s usually easier to evaluate functions at integer values than non-integers, and it’s especially easy at 0. So, for a value to the left of 11/8, choose 0; for a value to the right of 11/8 and the left of 22/7, choose 2; and for a value to the right of 22/7, choose 4. Let’s say f ’(0) = –1; f ’(2) = 5/9; and f ’(4) = 5. Then we could draw this sign diagram: Value of x 11 22 8 7 Sign of f ’(x) negative positive positive ! ! 4. Apply the first derivative test (textbook, top of p. 172, restated in terms of the derivative): If f ’ changes from negative to positive: f has a local minimum at the critical point If f ’ changes from positive to negative: f has a local maximum at the critical point If f ’ is positive on both sides or negative on both sides: f has neither one For the above example, we could tell from the sign diagram that 11/8 is a local minimum of f (x), while 22/7 is neither a local minimum nor a local maximum.
    [Show full text]