1 Mean Value Theorem 1 1.1 Applications of the Mean Value Theorem

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1 Mean Value Theorem 1 1.1 Applications of the Mean Value Theorem Seunghee Ye Ma 8: Week 5 Oct 28 Week 5 Summary In Section 1, we go over the Mean Value Theorem and its applications. In Section 2, we will recap what we have covered so far this term. Topics Page 1 Mean Value Theorem 1 1.1 Applications of the Mean Value Theorem . .1 2 Midterm Review 5 2.1 Proof Techniques . .5 2.2 Sequences . .6 2.3 Series . .7 2.4 Continuity and Differentiability of Functions . .9 1 Mean Value Theorem The Mean Value Theorem is the following result: Theorem 1.1 (Mean Value Theorem). Let f be a continuous function on [a; b], which is differentiable on (a; b). Then, there exists some value c 2 (a; b) such that f(b) − f(a) f 0(c) = b − a Intuitively, the Mean Value Theorem is quite trivial. Say we want to drive to San Francisco, which is 380 miles from Caltech according to Google Map. If we start driving at 8am and arrive at 12pm, we know that we were driving over the speed limit at least once during the drive. This is exactly what the Mean Value Theorem tells us. Since the distance travelled is a continuous function of time, we know that there is a point in time when our speed was ≥ 380=4 >>> speed limit. As we can see from this example, the Mean Value Theorem is usually not a tough theorem to understand. The tricky thing is realizing when you should try to use it. Roughly speaking, we use the Mean Value Theorem when we want to turn the information about a function into information about its derivative, or vice-versa. 1.1 Applications of the Mean Value Theorem Example 1.1. Consider the equation (x + y)n = xn + yn If either x or y is zero, the equation holds. Also, if x = −y and n is odd, the equation holds. Are there other values of x; y 2 R and n 2 N for which we can find solutions for above equation? Solution. We will show that the answer is no. First, we note the following lemma we can prove using the Mean Value Theorem: 0 Lemma 1.1. Let f be a differentiable function with k distinct roots a1 < a2 < ··· < ak. Then, f has at least k − 1 distinct roots b1 < b2 < ··· < bk−1 such that a1 < b1 < a2 < b2 < ··· < ak−1 < bk−1 < ak Page 1 of 10 Seunghee Ye Ma 8: Week 5 Oct 28 Proof. Since f is differentiable on [a1; a2], by the Mean Value Theorem, we can find b1 2 (a1; a2) such that 0 f(a2) − f(a1) 0 − 0 f (b1) = = = 0 a2 − a1 a2 − a1 In other words, b1 is a root of f. Repeating this argument for [ai; ai+1] for i = 1; : : : ; k − 1, we find k − 1 0 distinct roots b1; : : : ; bk−1 of f with the desired property. How can we use this lemma to solve our problem? Let's fix a nonzero value y 2 R and n 2 N, and look at the equation n n n fn(x) = (x + y) − x − y Note that we are trying to find out which values of x satisfy f(x) = 0. Currently we know that the following values of x are roots of f(x): 1. If n is even, the only root we know is x = 0. 2. If n is odd, we know that x = 0 and x = −y are roots 0 Can there be more distinct roots? By Lemma 1.1 we know that if fn(x) has k distinct roots, fn(x) must 0 have at least k − 1 distinct roots. So let's see how many roots fn(x) can have. Differentiating we obtain 0 n−1 n−1 fn(x) = n(x + y) − nx 0 Now, if x is a root of fn(x), we have 0 = n(x + y)n−1 − nxn−1 (1) , nxn−1 = n(x + y)n−1 (2) , xn−1 = (x + y)n−1 (3) Now, we have two cases depending on whether n is even or odd. If n is even, n − 1 is odd. Hence, (3) is equivalent to x = x + y , y = 0 0 which contradicts our nonzero choice of y. Hence, when n is even, fn(x) does not have a root. Therefore, fn(x) can have at most 1 distinct root, namely x = 0. If n is odd, then n − 1 is even. Now (3) is equivalent to jxj = jx + yj , ±x = x + y , y = 0 or y = −2x 0 y Again, since we chose y to be nonzero, fn(x) has a unique root x = − 2 . By Lemma 1.1, we conlcude that fn(x) can have at most 2 distinct roots, namely x = 0 and x = −y. Therefore, there can be no other type of roots to the original equation than the ones listed. Example 1.1 showed how we could turn information about our function (specifically, knowledge of where its roots are) into information about the derivative. The Mean Value Theorem can also be used to turn information about the derivative into information about the function as we illustrate here: Example 1.2. Let p(t) denote the current location of a particle moving in a one-dimensional space. Suppose that p(0) = 0; p(1) = 1 and p0(0) = p0(1) = 0. Show that there must be some point in time in [0; 1] where jp00(t)j ≥ 4. Solution. We will prove this by contradiction. Page 2 of 10 Seunghee Ye Ma 8: Week 5 Oct 28 Suppose for every t 2 [0; 1], we have jp00(t)j < 4. Where can we go from here? We have some boundary conditions, i.e. p(0) = 0; p(1) = 1; p0(0) = p0(1) = 0, and one piece of global information, i.e. jp00(t)j < 4. How can we turn this knowledge of the second derivative to information about the rest of the function? What does the Mean Value Theorem say about p0(t)? It tells us that on any interval [a; b], we can find c 2 (a; b) such that p0(b) − p0(a) = (p0)0(c) = p00(c) b − 1 In particular, we know that for all [a; b] ⊂ [0; 1] the Mean Value Theorem tells us that 0 0 p (b) − p (a) 00 = jp (c)j < 4 b − a where c 2 (a; b) ⊂ [0; 1]. In particular, if we set a = 0; b = t and remember that p0(0) = 0, we see that 0 0 0 0 p (t) − p (0) p (t) − 0 jp (t)j = = < 4 t − 0 t t Hence, jp0(t)j < 4t. Similarly, if we let a = 1 − t; b = 1 and remember p0(1) = 0, we get 0 0 0 0 p (1) − p (1 − t) 0 − p (1 − t) jp (1 − t)j = = < 4 1 − (1 − t) t t Hence, jp0(1 − t)j < 4t. Great. So we managed to turn information about the second derivative to information about the first derivative. Let's pretend for the moment that you are back in your high school calculus course and you know how to find antiderivatives. In this situation, we have a function p(t) with the following properties: • p(0) = 0; p(1) = 1 •j p0(t)j < 4t for all t 2 (0; 1) •j p0(1 − t)j < 4t for all t 2 (0; 1) Well, if p0(t) < 4t, we can integrate to get p(t) < 2t2 + C. Since p(0) = 0, we see that p(t) < 2t2 8t 2 (0; 1) Now, since p0(1 − t) < 4t we know that −p0(1 − t) > −4t. Integrating, we get p(1 − t) > −2t2 + C and using p(1) = 1, we see that p(1 − t) > −2t2 + 1 8t 2 (0; 1) 1 But what happens when we take a look at t = 2 ? In our first inequality, we have 1 12 1 p < 2 = 2 2 2 But in our second inequality we have 1 12 1 p 1 − > −2 + 1 = 2 2 2 Hence, we get 1 1 1 < p < 2 2 2 Page 3 of 10 Seunghee Ye Ma 8: Week 5 Oct 28 which is a contradiction. Of course, this was assuming we knew how to find antiderivatives. Let's solve this problem using just the tools we have available to us. In fact, let's use the Mean Value Theorem one more time to solve the problem. Earlier, we turned information about the second derivative into information about the first derivative. Can we try the same trick to get information about the original function, p(x)? By the Mean Value Theorem, we know that for all t 2 [0; 1], we can find c 2 (0; t) such that p(t) − p(0) p(t) = = p0(c) t − 0 t However, we know that jp0(c)j < 4c < 4t for all c 2 (0; t) ⊂ (0; 1). Hence, we get p(t) 0 2 = jp (c)j < 4c < 4t ) jp(t)j < 4t t This isn't exactly the bound jp(t)j < 2t2 we obtained by integrating. But we can take this bound and look at the interval [t; 2t] ⊂ [0; 1]. By the Mean Value Theoren, we can find c 2 (t; 2t) ⊂ (0; 1) such that p(2t) − p(t) = p0(c) 2t − t Hence, we get jp(2t) − p(t)j = tjp0(c)j < t · 4c < t · 4 · 2t = 8t2 ) jp(2t)j < jp(t)j + 8t2 < 4t2 + 8t2 Hence, for all t such that 2t 2 [0; 1], we have jp(2t)j < 4t2 + 8t2 = 4t2(1 + 2) Let's do one more step.
Recommended publications
  • The Directional Derivative the Derivative of a Real Valued Function (Scalar field) with Respect to a Vector
    Math 253 The Directional Derivative The derivative of a real valued function (scalar field) with respect to a vector. f(x + h) f(x) What is the vector space analog to the usual derivative in one variable? f 0(x) = lim − ? h 0 h ! x -2 0 2 5 Suppose f is a real valued function (a mapping f : Rn R). ! (e.g. f(x; y) = x2 y2). − 0 Unlike the case with plane figures, functions grow in a variety of z ways at each point on a surface (or n{dimensional structure). We'll be interested in examining the way (f) changes as we move -5 from a point X~ to a nearby point in a particular direction. -2 0 y 2 Figure 1: f(x; y) = x2 y2 − The Directional Derivative x -2 0 2 5 We'll be interested in examining the way (f) changes as we move ~ in a particular direction 0 from a point X to a nearby point . z -5 -2 0 y 2 Figure 2: f(x; y) = x2 y2 − y If we give the direction by using a second vector, say ~u, then for →u X→ + h any real number h, the vector X~ + h~u represents a change in X→ position from X~ along a line through X~ parallel to ~u. →u →u h x Figure 3: Change in position along line parallel to ~u The Directional Derivative x -2 0 2 5 We'll be interested in examining the way (f) changes as we move ~ in a particular direction 0 from a point X to a nearby point .
    [Show full text]
  • Cauchy Integral Theorem
    Cauchy’s Theorems I Ang M.S. Augustin-Louis Cauchy October 26, 2012 1789 – 1857 References Murray R. Spiegel Complex V ariables with introduction to conformal mapping and its applications Dennis G. Zill , P. D. Shanahan A F irst Course in Complex Analysis with Applications J. H. Mathews , R. W. Howell Complex Analysis F or Mathematics and Engineerng 1 Summary • Cauchy Integral Theorem Let f be analytic in a simply connected domain D. If C is a simple closed contour that lies in D , and there is no singular point inside the contour, then ˆ f (z) dz = 0 C • Cauchy Integral Formula (For simple pole) If there is a singular point z0 inside the contour, then ˛ f(z) dz = 2πj f(z0) z − z0 • Generalized Cauchy Integral Formula (For pole with any order) ˛ f(z) 2πj (n−1) n dz = f (z0) (z − z0) (n − 1)! • Cauchy Inequality M · n! f (n)(z ) ≤ 0 rn • Gauss Mean Value Theorem ˆ 2π ( ) 1 jθ f(z0) = f z0 + re dθ 2π 0 1 2 Related Mathematics Review 2.1 Stoke’s Theorem ¨ ˛ r × F¯ · dS = F¯ · dr Σ @Σ (The proof is skipped) ¯ Consider F = (FX ;FY ;FZ ) 0 1 x^ y^ z^ B @ @ @ C r × F¯ = det B C @ @x @y @z A FX FY FZ Let FZ = 0 0 1 x^ y^ z^ B @ @ @ C r × F¯ = det B C @ @x @y @z A FX FY 0 dS =ndS ^ , for dS = dxdy , n^ =z ^ . By z^ · z^ = 1 , consider z^ component only for r × F¯ 0 1 x^ y^ z^ ( ) B @ @ @ C @F @F r × F¯ = det B C = Y − X z^ @ @x @y @z A @x @y FX FY 0 i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Calculus and Differential Equations II
    Calculus and Differential Equations II MATH 250 B Sequences and series Sequences and series Calculus and Differential Equations II Sequences A sequence is an infinite list of numbers, s1; s2;:::; sn;::: , indexed by integers. 1n Example 1: Find the first five terms of s = (−1)n , n 3 n ≥ 1. Example 2: Find a formula for sn, n ≥ 1, given that its first five terms are 0; 2; 6; 14; 30. Some sequences are defined recursively. For instance, sn = 2 sn−1 + 3, n > 1, with s1 = 1. If lim sn = L, where L is a number, we say that the sequence n!1 (sn) converges to L. If such a limit does not exist or if L = ±∞, one says that the sequence diverges. Sequences and series Calculus and Differential Equations II Sequences (continued) 2n Example 3: Does the sequence converge? 5n 1 Yes 2 No n 5 Example 4: Does the sequence + converge? 2 n 1 Yes 2 No sin(2n) Example 5: Does the sequence converge? n Remarks: 1 A convergent sequence is bounded, i.e. one can find two numbers M and N such that M < sn < N, for all n's. 2 If a sequence is bounded and monotone, then it converges. Sequences and series Calculus and Differential Equations II Series A series is a pair of sequences, (Sn) and (un) such that n X Sn = uk : k=1 A geometric series is of the form 2 3 n−1 k−1 Sn = a + ax + ax + ax + ··· + ax ; uk = ax 1 − xn One can show that if x 6= 1, S = a .
    [Show full text]
  • 3.3 Convergence Tests for Infinite Series
    3.3 Convergence Tests for Infinite Series 3.3.1 The integral test We may plot the sequence an in the Cartesian plane, with independent variable n and dependent variable a: n X The sum an can then be represented geometrically as the area of a collection of rectangles with n=1 height an and width 1. This geometric viewpoint suggests that we compare this sum to an integral. If an can be represented as a continuous function of n, for real numbers n, not just integers, and if the m X sequence an is decreasing, then an looks a bit like area under the curve a = a(n). n=1 In particular, m m+2 X Z m+1 X an > an dn > an n=1 n=1 n=2 For example, let us examine the first 10 terms of the harmonic series 10 X 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 = 1 + + + + + + + + + : n 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 1 1 If we draw the curve y = x (or a = n ) we see that 10 11 10 X 1 Z 11 dx X 1 X 1 1 > > = − 1 + : n x n n 11 1 1 2 1 (See Figure 1, copied from Wikipedia) Z 11 dx Now = ln(11) − ln(1) = ln(11) so 1 x 10 X 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 = 1 + + + + + + + + + > ln(11) n 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 and 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 + + + + + + + + + < ln(11) + (1 − ): 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Z dx So we may bound our series, above and below, with some version of the integral : x If we allow the sum to turn into an infinite series, we turn the integral into an improper integral.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is on Today 1 Alternating Series
    MA 124 (Calculus II) Lecture 17: March 28, 2019 Section A3 Professor Jennifer Balakrishnan, [email protected] What is on today 1 Alternating series1 1 Alternating series Briggs-Cochran-Gillett x8:6 pp. 649 - 656 We begin by reviewing the Alternating Series Test: P k+1 Theorem 1 (Alternating Series Test). The alternating series (−1) ak converges if 1. the terms of the series are nonincreasing in magnitude (0 < ak+1 ≤ ak, for k greater than some index N) and 2. limk!1 ak = 0. For series of positive terms, limk!1 ak = 0 does NOT imply convergence. For alter- nating series with nonincreasing terms, limk!1 ak = 0 DOES imply convergence. Example 2 (x8.6 Ex 16, 20, 24). Determine whether the following series converge. P1 (−1)k 1. k=0 k2+10 P1 1 k 2. k=0 − 5 P1 (−1)k 3. k=2 k ln2 k 1 MA 124 (Calculus II) Lecture 17: March 28, 2019 Section A3 Recall that if a series converges to a value S, then the remainder is Rn = S − Sn, where Sn is the sum of the first n terms of the series. An upper bound on the magnitude of the remainder (the absolute error) in an alternating series arises form the following observation: when the terms are nonincreasing in magnitude, the value of the series is always trapped between successive terms of the sequence of partial sums. Thus we have jRnj = jS − Snj ≤ jSn+1 − Snj = an+1: This justifies the following theorem: P1 k+1 Theorem 3 (Remainder in Alternating Series).
    [Show full text]
  • Series: Convergence and Divergence Comparison Tests
    Series: Convergence and Divergence Here is a compilation of what we have done so far (up to the end of October) in terms of convergence and divergence. • Series that we know about: P∞ n Geometric Series: A geometric series is a series of the form n=0 ar . The series converges if |r| < 1 and 1 a1 diverges otherwise . If |r| < 1, the sum of the entire series is 1−r where a is the first term of the series and r is the common ratio. P∞ 1 2 p-Series Test: The series n=1 np converges if p1 and diverges otherwise . P∞ • Nth Term Test for Divergence: If limn→∞ an 6= 0, then the series n=1 an diverges. Note: If limn→∞ an = 0 we know nothing. It is possible that the series converges but it is possible that the series diverges. Comparison Tests: P∞ • Direct Comparison Test: If a series n=1 an has all positive terms, and all of its terms are eventually bigger than those in a series that is known to be divergent, then it is also divergent. The reverse is also true–if all the terms are eventually smaller than those of some convergent series, then the series is convergent. P P P That is, if an, bn and cn are all series with positive terms and an ≤ bn ≤ cn for all n sufficiently large, then P P if cn converges, then bn does as well P P if an diverges, then bn does as well. (This is a good test to use with rational functions.
    [Show full text]
  • MATH 25B Professor: Bena Tshishiku Michele Tienni Lowell House
    MATH 25B Professor: Bena Tshishiku Michele Tienni Lowell House Cambridge, MA 02138 [email protected] Please note that these notes are not official and they are not to be considered as a sub- stitute for your notes. Specifically, you should not cite these notes in any of the work submitted for the class (problem sets, exams). The author does not guarantee the accu- racy of the content of this document. If you find a typo (which will probably happen) feel free to email me. Contents 1. January 225 1.1. Functions5 1.2. Limits6 2. January 247 2.1. Theorems about limits7 2.2. Continuity8 3. January 26 10 3.1. Continuity theorems 10 4. January 29 – Notes by Kim 12 4.1. Least Upper Bound property (the secret sauce of R) 12 4.2. Proof of the intermediate value theorem 13 4.3. Proof of the boundedness theorem 13 5. January 31 – Notes by Natalia 14 5.1. Generalizing the boundedness theorem 14 5.2. Subsets of Rn 14 5.3. Compactness 15 6. February 2 16 6.1. Onion ring theorem 16 6.2. Proof of Theorem 6.5 17 6.3. Compactness of closed rectangles 17 6.4. Further applications of compactness 17 7. February 5 19 7.1. Derivatives 19 7.2. Computing derivatives 20 8. February 7 22 8.1. Chain rule 22 Date: April 25, 2018. 1 8.2. Meaning of f 0 23 9. February 9 25 9.1. Polynomial approximation 25 9.2. Derivative magic wands 26 9.3. Taylor’s Theorem 27 9.4.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mean Value Theorem) – Be Able to Precisely State the Mean Value Theorem and Rolle’S Theorem
    Math 220 { Test 3 Information The test will be given during your lecture period on Wednesday (April 27, 2016). No books, notes, scratch paper, calculators or other electronic devices are allowed. Bring a Student ID. It may be helpful to look at • http://www.math.illinois.edu/~murphyrf/teaching/M220-S2016/ { Volumes worksheet, quizzes 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12, and Daily Assignments for a summary of each lecture • https://compass2g.illinois.edu/ { Homework solutions • http://www.math.illinois.edu/~murphyrf/teaching/M220/ { Tests and quizzes in my previous courses • Section 3.10 (Linear Approximation and Differentials) { Be able to use a tangent line (or differentials) in order to approximate the value of a function near the point of tangency. • Section 4.2 (The Mean Value Theorem) { Be able to precisely state The Mean Value Theorem and Rolle's Theorem. { Be able to decide when functions satisfy the conditions of these theorems. If a function does satisfy the conditions, then be able to find the value of c guaranteed by the theorems. { Be able to use The Mean Value Theorem, Rolle's Theorem, or earlier important the- orems such as The Intermediate Value Theorem to prove some other fact. In the homework these often involved roots, solutions, x-intercepts, or intersection points. • Section 4.8 (Newton's Method) { Understand the graphical basis for Newton's Method (that is, use the point where the tangent line crosses the x-axis as your next estimate for a root of a function). { Be able to apply Newton's Method to approximate roots, solutions, x-intercepts, or intersection points.
    [Show full text]
  • Calculus Terminology
    AP Calculus BC Calculus Terminology Absolute Convergence Asymptote Continued Sum Absolute Maximum Average Rate of Change Continuous Function Absolute Minimum Average Value of a Function Continuously Differentiable Function Absolutely Convergent Axis of Rotation Converge Acceleration Boundary Value Problem Converge Absolutely Alternating Series Bounded Function Converge Conditionally Alternating Series Remainder Bounded Sequence Convergence Tests Alternating Series Test Bounds of Integration Convergent Sequence Analytic Methods Calculus Convergent Series Annulus Cartesian Form Critical Number Antiderivative of a Function Cavalieri’s Principle Critical Point Approximation by Differentials Center of Mass Formula Critical Value Arc Length of a Curve Centroid Curly d Area below a Curve Chain Rule Curve Area between Curves Comparison Test Curve Sketching Area of an Ellipse Concave Cusp Area of a Parabolic Segment Concave Down Cylindrical Shell Method Area under a Curve Concave Up Decreasing Function Area Using Parametric Equations Conditional Convergence Definite Integral Area Using Polar Coordinates Constant Term Definite Integral Rules Degenerate Divergent Series Function Operations Del Operator e Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Deleted Neighborhood Ellipsoid GLB Derivative End Behavior Global Maximum Derivative of a Power Series Essential Discontinuity Global Minimum Derivative Rules Explicit Differentiation Golden Spiral Difference Quotient Explicit Function Graphic Methods Differentiable Exponential Decay Greatest Lower Bound Differential
    [Show full text]
  • Math 6B Notes Written by Victoria Kala [email protected] SH 6432U Office Hours: R 12:30 − 1:30Pm Last Updated 5/31/2016
    Math 6B Notes Written by Victoria Kala [email protected] SH 6432u Office Hours: R 12:30 − 1:30pm Last updated 5/31/2016 Green's Theorem We say that a closed curve is positively oriented if it is oriented counterclockwise. It is negatively oriented if it is oriented clockwise. Theorem (Green's Theorem). Let C be a positively oriented, piecewise smooth, simple closed curve in the plane and let D be the region bounded by C. If F(x; y) = (P (x; y);Q(x; y)) with P and Q having continuous partial derivatives on an open region that contains D, then Z Z ZZ @Q @P F · ds = P dx + Qdy = − dA: C C D @x @y In other words, Green's Theorem allows us to change from a complicated line integral over a curve C to a less complicated double integral over the region bounded by C. The Operator r We define the vector differential operator r (called \del") as @ @ @ r = i + j + k: @x @y @z The gradient of a function f is given by @f @f @f rf = i + j + k: @x @y @z The curl of a function F = P i + Qj + Rk is defined as curl F = r × F: Written out more explicitly: i j k @ @ @ curl F = r × F = @x @y @z PQR @ @ @ @ @ @ = @y @z i − @x @z j + @x @y k QR PR PQ @R @Q @P @R @Q @P = − i + − j + − k @y @z @z @x @x @y 1 The divergence of function F = P i + Qj + Rk is defined as @P @Q @R div F = r · F = + + : @x @y @z Notice that the curl of a function is a vector and the divergence of a function is a scalar (just a number).
    [Show full text]
  • Calculus Formulas and Theorems
    Formulas and Theorems for Reference I. Tbigonometric Formulas l. sin2d+c,cis2d:1 sec2d l*cot20:<:sc:20 +.I sin(-d) : -sitt0 t,rs(-//) = t r1sl/ : -tallH 7. sin(A* B) :sitrAcosB*silBcosA 8. : siri A cos B - siu B <:os,;l 9. cos(A+ B) - cos,4cos B - siuA siriB 10. cos(A- B) : cosA cosB + silrA sirrB 11. 2 sirrd t:osd 12. <'os20- coS2(i - siu20 : 2<'os2o - I - 1 - 2sin20 I 13. tan d : <.rft0 (:ost/ I 14. <:ol0 : sirrd tattH 1 15. (:OS I/ 1 16. cscd - ri" 6i /F tl r(. cos[I ^ -el : sitt d \l 18. -01 : COSA 215 216 Formulas and Theorems II. Differentiation Formulas !(r") - trr:"-1 Q,:I' ]tra-fg'+gf' gJ'-,f g' - * (i) ,l' ,I - (tt(.r))9'(.,') ,i;.[tyt.rt) l'' d, \ (sttt rrJ .* ('oqI' .7, tJ, \ . ./ stll lr dr. l('os J { 1a,,,t,:r) - .,' o.t "11'2 1(<,ot.r') - (,.(,2.r' Q:T rl , (sc'c:.r'J: sPl'.r tall 11 ,7, d, - (<:s<t.r,; - (ls(].]'(rot;.r fr("'),t -.'' ,1 - fr(u") o,'ltrc ,l ,, 1 ' tlll ri - (l.t' .f d,^ --: I -iAl'CSllLl'l t!.r' J1 - rz 1(Arcsi' r) : oT Il12 Formulas and Theorems 2I7 III. Integration Formulas 1. ,f "or:artC 2. [\0,-trrlrl *(' .t "r 3. [,' ,t.,: r^x| (' ,I 4. In' a,,: lL , ,' .l 111Q 5. In., a.r: .rhr.r' .r r (' ,l f 6. sirr.r d.r' - ( os.r'-t C ./ 7. /.,,.r' dr : sitr.i'| (' .t 8. tl:r:hr sec,rl+ C or ln Jccrsrl+ C ,f'r^rr f 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Approaching Green's Theorem Via Riemann Sums
    APPROACHING GREEN’S THEOREM VIA RIEMANN SUMS JENNIE BUSKIN, PHILIP PROSAPIO, AND SCOTT A. TAYLOR ABSTRACT. We give a proof of Green’s theorem which captures the underlying intuition and which relies only on the mean value theorems for derivatives and integrals and on the change of variables theorem for double integrals. 1. INTRODUCTION The counterpoint of the discrete and continuous has been, perhaps even since Eu- clid, the essence of many mathematical fugues. Despite this, there are fundamental mathematical subjects where their voices are difficult to distinguish. For example, although early Calculus courses make much of the passage from the discrete world of average rate of change and Riemann sums to the continuous (or, more accurately, smooth) world of derivatives and integrals, by the time the student reaches the cen- tral material of vector calculus: scalar fields, vector fields, and their integrals over curves and surfaces, the voice of discrete mathematics has been obscured by the coloratura of continuous mathematics. Our aim in this article is to restore the bal- ance of the voices by showing how Green’s Theorem can be understood from the discrete point of view. Although Green’s Theorem admits many generalizations (the most important un- doubtedly being the Generalized Stokes’ Theorem from the theory of differentiable manifolds), we restrict ourselves to one of its simplest forms: Green’s Theorem. Let S ⊂ R2 be a compact surface bounded by (finitely many) simple closed piecewise C1 curves oriented so that S is on their left. Suppose that M F = is a C1 vector field defined on an open set U containing S.
    [Show full text]