A Historical and Semantical Study of Turkmens and Turkmen Tribes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Historical and Semantical Study of Turkmens and Turkmen Tribes A HISTORICAL AND SEMANTICAL STUDY OF TURKMENS AND TURKMEN TRIBES A Master’s Thesis by F. ESİN ÖZALP DEPARTMENT OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS BILKENT UNIVERSITY ANKARA August 2008 To my beloved sister Elif, A HISTORICAL AND SEMANTICAL STUDY OF TURKMENS AND TURKMEN TRIBES The Institute of Economics and Social Sciences of Bilkent University by F. ESİN ÖZALP In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS in THE DEPARTMENT OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS BILKENT UNIVERSITY ANKARA August 2008 I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in International Relations. --------------------------- Dr. Hasan Ali Karasar Supervisor I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in International Relations. --------------------------- Associate Prof. S. Hakan Kırımlı Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in International Relations. --------------------------- Prof. Dr. Hasan Ünal Examining Committee Member Approval of the Institute of Economics and Social Sciences --------------------------- Prof. Dr. Erdal Erel Director ABSTRACT Özalp, F. Esin M.A. Department of International Relations Supervisor: Dr. Hasan Ali Karasar August 2008 This work traces the history and the tribal organization of the Turkmen tribes of today’s Turkmenistan. The study covers the period from the beginning of the tenth century up until the Russian conquest of the nineteenth century with a special emphasis given to the very early history of the Oghuz, the early Seljuk Turkmens and lastly the Turkmens under Uzbek Khanates and Persian rule. The aim is to find out how Turkmen tribes, tribal confederations and clans had taken their contemporary shape. Considering the role they played in history, the Oghuz, the forefathers of the Turkmens, enjoy great importance among the various branches of the Turkish people. Thus, in order to accomplish a comprehensive study of the Turkmen people within Turkistan, this work begins with detailed information about the etymology of the word “Turkmen,” the names of the Turkmen tribes, and their structure by relying on the valuable works of the leading ancient scholars. Throughout centuries, the territory which is known to be the Turkmen land witnessed several conquerors; the Oghuz, Seljuks, Mongols, Timurids, Shaybanids, Uzbek Khanates and finally the Russians. By examining these troublesome periods in particular, this work aims to analyze the Turkmen people’s struggle against the Khivan, Persian and Russian dominance, and their tribal structure prior to the Russian conquest. Key words: Oghuz, Turkmen, Turkmen Tribes, Subtribes, and Clans iii ÖZET Özalp, F. Esin Master tezi, Uluslararası İlişkiler Bölümü Tez Yöneticisi: Dr. Hasan Ali Karasar Ağustos 2008 Bu çalışma onuncu yüzyıl başlarından on dokuzuncu yüzyıldaki Rus işgaline kadar olan zamanı esas alarak günümüz Türkmenistan topraklarında yaşayan ve tarihsel süreçte Oğuz Yabgu Devleti, Selçuk İmparatorluğu, Özbek Hanlıkları ve İran egemenliğinde yaşayan Türkmenlerin tarihini ve boy yapılarını incelemektedir. Çalışmanın amacı, Türkmen boyları, boy konfederasyonları ve kabilelerinin tarihsel süreçte bugünkü şekillerini nasıl aldığını göstermektir. Tarihte oynadıkları rol göz önüne alınırsa, Türkmenlerin ataları Oğuzlar, diğer Türk boyları arasında ayrıcalıklı bir konuma sahiptirler. Bu nedenle, Türkmenler konusunda kapsamlı bir inceleme yapabilmek için çalışmaya, İslam dünyasının en önde gelen âlimlerinin kıymetli eserleri ışığında “Türkmen” kelimesinin etimolojisi, Türkmen boylarının isimleri ve yapıları hakkında detaylı bir bilgi verilerek başlanmıştır. Yüzyıllar boyunca Türkmen toprakları olarak bilinen bölge, Oğuz Devleti, Selçuk, Moğol, Timur ve Şeybânî İmparatorlukları, Özbek Hanlıkları, İran İmparatorluğu ve son olarak Rus egemenliğinde kalmıştır. Çalışma, Türkmen tarihindeki bu zor dönemleri detaylı bir şekilde incelerken, Türkmen halkının on dokuzuncu yüzyılda Hive, İran ve Rus nüfuzuna karşı verdikleri mücadeleyi, bu dönemlerde geçirdikleri değişimi ve Rus işgalinden önceki Türkmen boy yapısını incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Anahtar Kelimeler: Oğuz, Türkmen, Türkmen Boy, Uruğ ve Tîreleri iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First and most of all, I wish to express my gratitude to Dr. Hasan Ali Karasar, who supervised me throughout the preparation of my thesis with a great patience and diligence. He carefully read the text word by many times and kindly provided his valuable comments. He has always had great faith in me and I am sure that without his encouragements I could not finalize this work. Apart from being my thesis adviser, in time, he has been a really good friend of mine. It is my pleasure to acknowledge the support of Associate Prof. Hakan Kırımlı for his being a truly inspiring academician. His invaluable guidance made a huge difference for all of us in our pursuit of academic excellence. I am also thankful to Prof. Dr. Hasan Ünal for spending his valuable time to read my thesis and kindly participating in my thesis committee. My thanks are also due to my very special friends and colleagues in Center for Russian Studies, namely Abdürrahim Özer, Nâzım Arda Çağdaş, Melih Demirtaş, and Pınar Üre. Our unique friendship and their kind support made this study possible. My dear friends Mahir Büyükyılmaz and Aslı Tan also deserve my special thanks for being there for me when I needed them the most. Last but not least, I owe my beloved parents and my dearest sister more than a general acknowledgement. If I happen to be a good academician one day, it is due to the generous love, continuous support, understanding and patience of the best mother and father on earth. v TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ..........................................................................................................iii ÖZET.....................................................................................................................iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS..................................................................................... v TABLE OF CONTENTS.....................................................................................vi APPENDICES ....................................................................................................viii LIST OF TABLES................................................................................................. x INTRODUCTION................................................................................................. 1 CHAPTER I: THE DERIVATION OF THE “TURKMEN” TERM ............ 11 1.1. The Origin of the “Turkmen” Term .................................................... 11 1.2. Turkmen Term in the Works of Islamic Scholars ............................... 19 1.2.1. Turkmen Tribes’ Names, Ranks, Belges (Tamgas), and Onguns According to Various Islamic Scholars.....................................................25 1.2.1.1 List of the Oghuz/Turkmen Tribes According to Kaşgarlı Mahmud, Reşîdeddin Fazlullah, Yazıcıoğlu Ali, Mehmet Neşrî, and Ebulgazi Bahadır Khan....................................................................... 26 1.2.1.2 List of the Enumeration of the Oghuz/Turkmen Tribes According to Kaşgarlı Mahmud, Reşîdeddin Fazlullah, Yazıcıoğlu Ali, Mehmet Neşrî, and Ebulgazi Bahadır Khan................................ 30 1.2.1.3 The Division of the Oghuz/Turkmen Tribes into Bozok and Üçok Tribes According to Reşîdeddin Fazlullah................................ 34 1.2.1.4 The Division of the Oghuz/Turkmen Tribes into Bozok and Üçok Tribes According to Ebulgazi Bahadır Khan............................ 35 1.2.1.5 The Belges [Tamgas] of the Oghuz/Turkmen Tribes According to Kaşgarlı Mahmud ......................................................... 37 1.2.1.6 List of the Names, Tamgas, Onguns and Ülüş of the Oghuz/Turkmen Tribes According to Reşîdeddin Fazlullah.............. 39 vi 1.2.1.7 List of the Names, Onguns, Tamgas and Ülüş of the Oghuz/Turkmen Tribes According to According to Ebulgazi Bahadır Khan ............................................................................................. 45 1.3. Modern Scholars’ Views on the Etymology of the Turkmen Term.... 47 1.4. Conclusions on the derivation of the “Turkmen” term .......................55 CHAPTER II: THE HISTORY OF THE EARLY TURKMENS.................. 61 2.1 The Rise of the Seljuk Dynasty...........................................................61 2.2 Early Seljuk Turkmens........................................................................ 66 2.3 Seljuk Turkmens after Selçuk’s Death................................................ 72 2.4 Late Seljuk Turkmens under the Seljuk Realm................................... 76 2.5 Seljuks of Rûm (Anatolia)................................................................... 83 2.6 Seljuk Turkmens under the Mongol Rule ........................................... 86 2.7 Conclusions on the Turkmens after the Mongol Rule......................... 88 CHAPTER III: THE UZBEK KHANATES AND THE CONQUEST OF THE TURKMEN LAND .................................................................................... 90 3.1. Rise of the Uzbek Dynasty..................................................................91 3.2. The Khivan Khanate............................................................................92
Recommended publications
  • Toponimys with Ancient Turk Origins in the Balkans
    IBAC 2012 vol.2 TOPONIMYS WITH ANCIENT TURK ORIGINS IN THE BALKANS Prof .Ass. Hajiyeva GALIBA Nakhchivan State Univresity, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract One of the sources dealing with the ancient Turkic history are toponyms. Toponymic investigations show that most of the ancient geographical names which have spread in Eurosia, in Central Asia, from North Africa, to Eastern Turkistan even in Siberia and these names were formed before Roman and Byzantine periods. So development of toponymic investigations, study of the history of Turkic peoples and scientific investigation of existing geographical names which keep the history of Turkic peoples have great significance. One of the uninvestigated fields of the Turkic history are geographical names keeping historical facts within are the holy Balkan areas. The toponymic investigations carried on the Balkans show that these territories are the places were the ancient Turkic tribes were firstly settled and possessed. This fact is proved by the Turkic tribe names and by the words of different semantic meaning of the languages of Turkic tribes. The great deal of Balkan geographical names are the names derived out of ethnoniyms thus the names reflecting ancient Turkic tribe names (Astipos//Astepe//Ishtip, Izletdere, Vardar, Sofular, Gilan, Sahsuvar kariyesi, Kosalar village, Tatarli kariyesi, in the Kosova, Uskup, Usturumca, Kumanova, Propishtip, Kochana, Makedonska Kamenika in Makedony, Araz district, Arazli, Azman, Cepine, Coban, Chorlu, Culfalar, Horozlar, Kangirlar, Sakarli, Sungurlar, Karuk, Kaspi, Kaz//Kas, Kazancilar, Kecililer, Kuman, Padarlar, Sofular, Tatar, Uzlar in Bulgaria) show that Balkans historically were Turkic areas. Geographical names are the real witnesses of history. We must pay great attention to the scientific investigations of the geographical names in Balkan states.
    [Show full text]
  • Selected Works of Chokan Valikhanov Selected Works of Chokan Valikhanov
    SELECTED WORKS OF CHOKAN VALIKHANOV CHOKAN OF WORKS SELECTED SELECTED WORKS OF CHOKAN VALIKHANOV Pioneering Ethnographer and Historian of the Great Steppe When Chokan Valikhanov died of tuberculosis in 1865, aged only 29, the Russian academician Nikolai Veselovsky described his short life as ‘a meteor flashing across the field of oriental studies’. Set against his remarkable output of official reports, articles and research into the history, culture and ethnology of Central Asia, and more important, his Kazakh people, it remains an entirely appropriate accolade. Born in 1835 into a wealthy and powerful Kazakh clan, he was one of the first ‘people of the steppe’ to receive a Russian education and military training. Soon after graduating from Siberian Cadet Corps at Omsk, he was taking part in reconnaissance missions deep into regions of Central Asia that had seldom been visited by outsiders. His famous mission to Kashgar in Chinese Turkestan, which began in June 1858 and lasted for more than a year, saw him in disguise as a Tashkent mer- chant, risking his life to gather vital information not just on current events, but also on the ethnic make-up, geography, flora and fauna of this unknown region. Journeys to Kuldzha, to Issyk-Kol and to other remote and unmapped places quickly established his reputation, even though he al- ways remained inorodets – an outsider to the Russian establishment. Nonetheless, he was elected to membership of the Imperial Russian Geographical Society and spent time in St Petersburg, where he was given a private audience by the Tsar. Wherever he went he made his mark, striking up strong and lasting friendships with the likes of the great Russian explorer and geographer Pyotr Petrovich Semyonov-Tian-Shansky and the writer Fyodor Dostoyevsky.
    [Show full text]
  • A Historical Contextual Analysis Study of Persian Silk Fabric: (Pre-Islamic Period- Buyid Dynasty)
    Proceedings of SOCIOINT 2017- 4th International Conference on Education, Social Sciences and Humanities 10-12 July 2017- Dubai, UAE A HISTORICAL CONTEXTUAL ANALYSIS STUDY OF PERSIAN SILK FABRIC: (PRE-ISLAMIC PERIOD- BUYID DYNASTY) Nadia Poorabbas Tahvildari1, Farinaz Farbod2, Azadeh Mehrpouyan3* 1Alzahra University, Art Faculty, Tehran, Iran and Research Institute of Cultural Heritage & Tourism, Traditional Art Department, Tehran, IRAN, [email protected] 2Alzahra University, Art Faculty, Tehran, IRAN, [email protected] 3Department of English Literature, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, IRAN, email: [email protected] *Corresponding author Abstract This paper explores the possibility existence of Persian silk fabric (Diba). The study also identifies the locations of Diba weave and its production. Based on the detailed analysis of Dida etymology and discovery locations, this paper present careful classification silk fabrics. Present study investigates the characteristics of Diba and introduces its sub-divisions from Pre-Islamic period to late Buyid dynasty. The paper reports the features of silk fabric of Ancient Persian, silk classification of Sasanian Empire based on discovery location, and silk sub-divisions of Buyaid dynasty. The results confirm the existence of Diba and its various types through a historical contextual analysis. Keywords: Persian Silk, Diba, Silk classification, Historical, context, location, Sasanian Empire 1. INTRODUCTION Diba is one of the machine woven fabrics (Research Institute of Cultural Heritage, Handicrafts and Tourism, 2009) which have been referred continuously as one of the exquisite silk fabrics during the history. History of weaving in Iran dated back to millenniums AD. The process of formation, production and continuity of this art in history of Iran took advantages of several factors such as economic, social, cultural and ecological factors.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of the Cultural Grounds in Formation and Growth of Ethnic Challenges in Azerbaijan, Iran
    Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies Copyright 2018 2018, Vol. 5, No. 2, 64-76 ISSN: 2149-1291 A Study of the Cultural Grounds in Formation and Growth of Ethnic Challenges in Azerbaijan, Iran Mansour Salehi1, Bahram Navazeni2, Masoud Jafarinezhad3 This study has been conducted with the aim of finding the cultural bases of ethnic challenges in Azerbaijan and tried to provide the desired solutions for managing ethnic diversity in Iran and proper policy making in order to respect the components and the culture of the people towards increasing national solidarity. In this regard, this study investigates the cultural grounds of the formation and growth of ethnic challenges created and will be created after the Constitutional Revolution in Azerbaijan, Iran. Accordingly, the main question is that what is the most influential cultural ground in formation and growth of ethnic challenges in Azerbaijan? Research method was the in-depth interview, which was followed by an interview with 32 related experts, and after accessing all the results obtained, analysis of interview data and quotative analysis performed with in-depth interview. Findings of the research indicate that emphasis on the language of a country, cultural discrimination, and the non- implementation of Article 15 of the Constitution for the abandonment of Turkish speakers with 39% were the most important domestic cultural ground, and the impact of satellite channels in Turkey and Republic of Azerbaijan with 32% and superior Turkish identity in the vicinity of Azerbaijan with 31%, were the most important external grounds in formation and growth of ethnic challenges in Azerbaijan in Iran.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Cambridge Medieval History, Volume IV - C
    Cambridge University Press 0521414113 - The New Cambridge Medieval History, Volume IV - c. 1024-c. 1198 Edited by David Luscombe and Jonathan Riley-Smith Index More information INDEX Aachen, 77, 396, 401, 402, 404, 405 Abul-Barakat al-Jarjara, 695, 700 Aaron, bishop of Cologne, 280 Acerra, counts of, 473 ‘Abbadids, kingdom of Seville, 157 Acre ‘Abbas ibn Tamim, 718 11th century, 702, 704, 705 ‘Abbasids 12th century Baghdad, 675, 685, 686, 687, 689, 702 1104 Latin conquest, 647 break-up of empire, 678, 680 1191 siege, 522, 663 and Byzantium, 696 and Ayyubids, 749 caliphate, before First Crusade, 1 fall to crusaders, 708 dynasty, 675, 677 fall to Saladin, 662, 663 response to Fatimid empire, 685–9 Fatimids, 728 abbeys, see monasteries and kingdom of Jerusalem, 654, 662, 664, abbots, 13, 530 667, 668, 669 ‘Abd Allah al-Ziri, king of Granada, 156, 169–70, Pisans, 664 180, 181, 183 trade, 727 ‘Abd al-Majid, 715 13th century, 749 ‘Abd al-Malik al-Muzaffar, 155, 158, 160, 163, 165 Adalasia of Sicily, 648 ‘Abd al-Mu’min, 487 Adalbero, bishop of Wurzburg,¨ 57 ‘Abd al-Rahman (Shanjul), 155, 156 Adalbero of Laon, 146, 151 ‘Abd al-Rahman III, 156, 159 Adalbert, archbishop of Mainz, 70, 71, 384–5, ‘Abd al-Rahman ibn Ilyas, 682 388, 400, 413, 414 Abelard of Conversano, 109, 110, 111, 115 Adalbert, bishop of Prague, 277, 279, 284, 288, Aberconwy, 599 312 Aberdeen, 590 Adalbert, bishop of Wolin, 283 Abergavenny, 205 Adalbert, king of Italy, 135 Abernethy agreement, 205 Adalgar, chancellor, 77 Aberteifi, 600 Adam of Bremen, 295 Abingdon, 201, 558 Adam of
    [Show full text]
  • Tribes and Empire on the Margins of Nineteenth-Century Iran
    publications on the near east publications on the near east Poetry’s Voice, Society’s Song: Ottoman Lyric The Transformation of Islamic Art during Poetry by Walter G. Andrews the Sunni Revival by Yasser Tabbaa The Remaking of Istanbul: Portrait of an Shiraz in the Age of Hafez: The Glory of Ottoman City in the Nineteenth Century a Medieval Persian City by John Limbert by Zeynep Çelik The Martyrs of Karbala: Shi‘i Symbols The Tragedy of Sohráb and Rostám from and Rituals in Modern Iran the Persian National Epic, the Shahname by Kamran Scot Aghaie of Abol-Qasem Ferdowsi, translated by Ottoman Lyric Poetry: An Anthology, Jerome W. Clinton Expanded Edition, edited and translated The Jews in Modern Egypt, 1914–1952 by Walter G. Andrews, Najaat Black, and by Gudrun Krämer Mehmet Kalpaklı Izmir and the Levantine World, 1550–1650 Party Building in the Modern Middle East: by Daniel Goffman The Origins of Competitive and Coercive Rule by Michele Penner Angrist Medieval Agriculture and Islamic Science: The Almanac of a Yemeni Sultan Everyday Life and Consumer Culture by Daniel Martin Varisco in Eighteenth-Century Damascus by James Grehan Rethinking Modernity and National Identity in Turkey, edited by Sibel Bozdog˘an and The City’s Pleasures: Istanbul in the Eigh- Res¸at Kasaba teenth Century by Shirine Hamadeh Slavery and Abolition in the Ottoman Middle Reading Orientalism: Said and the Unsaid East by Ehud R. Toledano by Daniel Martin Varisco Britons in the Ottoman Empire, 1642–1660 The Merchant Houses of Mocha: Trade by Daniel Goffman and Architecture in an Indian Ocean Port by Nancy Um Popular Preaching and Religious Authority in the Medieval Islamic Near East Tribes and Empire on the Margins of Nine- by Jonathan P.
    [Show full text]
  • Remembering Joseph Schacht (1902‑1969) by Jeanette Wakin ILSP
    ILSP Islamic Legal Studies Program Harvard Law School Remembering Joseph Schacht (1902-1969) by Jeanette Wakin Occasional Publications January © by the Presdent and Fellows of Harvard College All rghts reserved Prnted n the Unted States of Amerca ISBN --- The Islamic Legal Studies Program s dedcated to achevng excellence n the study of Islamc law through objectve and comparatve methods. It seeks to foster an atmosphere of open nqury whch em- braces many perspectves, both Muslm and non-Mus- lm, and to promote a deep apprecaton of Islamc law as one of the world’s major legal systems. The man focus of work at the Program s on Islamc law n the contemporary world. Ths focus accommodates the many nterests and dscplnes that contrbute to the study of Islamc law, ncludng the study of ts wrt- ngs and hstory. Frank Vogel Director Per Bearman Associate Director Islamc Legal Studes Program Pound Hall Massachusetts Ave. Cambrdge, MA , USA Tel: -- Fax: -- E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.law.harvard.edu/programs/ILSP Table of Contents Preface v Text, by Jeanette Wakin Bblography v Preface The followng artcle, by the late Jeanette Wakn of Columba Unversty, a frend of our Program and one of the leaders n the field of Islamc legal studes n the Unted States, memoralzes one of the most famous of Western Islamc legal scholars, her men- tor Joseph Schacht (d. ). Ths pece s nvaluable for many reasons, but foremost because t preserves and relably nterprets many facts about Schacht’s lfe and work. Equally, however—especally snce t s one of Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Tarihi Türk Sehri Balasagun Hakkinda Yeni Incelemeler
    TARİHİ TÜRK SEHRİ BALASAGUN HAKKİNDA YENİ İNCELEMELER VARİ S ABDURRAHMAN* Tarihi Türk şehri Balasagun Karahanlılar Devleti'nin başkentlerinden biri olup, eskiden beri Türk tarihindeki önemi itibariyle Türk kültürü araştırıcılarımn ilgisini çekmektedir. Ancak Balasagun hakkında yeterli bilgi veren orijinal kaynakların eksik olması, söz konusu şehir üzerine farklı görüşlerin ortaya atılmasına sebep olmuştur. Biz, elde mevcut yerli ve yabancı kaynaklardaki bilgilerin ışığında şimdiye kadar konuyla ilgili olarak yapılan çalışmaları da dikkate alarak, Balasagun şehrinin menşei, kuruluş tarihi, kurucuları ve sair hakkında yaptığım çalışmalar sonucu tespit ettiğimiz bazı hususları ortaya koymak istiyoruz. Balasagun şehrinin yerinin tespiti, Balasagun'la ilgili çalışmalardaki en önemli meselelerin biridir. Bu konuda yazılı kaynaklarda bazı ipuçları verilmiş ise de bir kısım araştırmacılar Arkeoloji ilminin eski şehirlerin tespiti konusunda sağladığı imkanlardanda, yararlanarak Balasagun'un ye- rini tespit etmeye çalıştı. Bunların başında meşhur Rus Türkolog W.Barthold gelmektedir. O, 20.yüzplın başında Orta Asya'daki Çu ve Talas Nehirleri kıyısında yaptığı çal ışmalar sonucu, söz konusu şehrin Ak-Beşim (Ak-Peşin) Harabelerinde kurulduğunu iddia ederek, Burana'nın Arapça- 'daki Manara'nın bozuk telaffuzu olduğunu savunuyor'. 1953-1955 yılları arasında Tokmak eski şehrinin Burana Harabesinde incelemelerde bulu- nan A.N.Bernştam, Ak-Beşim (Suyab) Kalesi'nin Balasagun olduğunu or- taya koyar2. P.N. Kojemyakov, Ak-Beşim Kalesi'nin haritasını çizdikten sonra Burana'nın IX.yüzyıla ait bir medeni yadigarlık olduğunu iddia eder. Kırgızistan ilimler Akademisi'nden W.D.Goryaçiva ise Burana'nın Balasagun olduğunu savunmaktadır3. Çinli araştırmacı Chang Kuang-ta da * Dr. Gazi Üniversitesi, Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi, Tarih Bölümü Öğretim Görevlisi. 1 W. Barthold, Orta Asya Türk Tarihi Hakkında Dersler (Çince Tercümesi), Pekin, 1984, s.83.
    [Show full text]
  • 3A. Ottoman Empire.Pdf
    Brief history and culture of Turkey and Balkan areas under the former Ottoman Empire An Empire before its time? Or An Empire doomed to fail? Which do you think makes a better government… one that is accepting and tolerant of people who are different or one that encourages, by force if necessary its people to be the same in order to create a more unified nation? Find the connections between history and current culture Because… Like it or not; realize it or not, we are all affected by the past Pay attention to notes that have a ** These are things that are going to influence/affect the Ottomans or modern day culture Ottoman empire began in modern day Turkey People are descendants of pastoral nomadic tribes from Central Asia In 10th century these tribes begin to move east Called themselves Oguz called Turkomans/“Turks” by their enemies Raiding of weaker neighbors (esp. the Byzantines) was common No formal govt. or laws ◦ Temporary leadership in the form of “Hans” Tribal society** ◦ loyalty, bravery family and hospitality important Shamanistic beliefs** ◦ Nature worship ◦ Man was powerless ◦ Good & evil spirits Invaded Persia in the 11th Century and conquered Bagdad Became mercenary guards for the Abbasid caliphs in Bagdad and protected them against outside threats Tugrul Bey became protector of the faith and champion of Orthodox Islam Seljuk rule spread to Central Asia, Palestine, Iraq and northern Iran Alp Arslan extended Seljuk rule into Syria, Armenia and sent raids into Anatolia (alarmed Byzantines) Battle of
    [Show full text]
  • Kebijakan Politik Dan Orientasi Keagamaan Dinasti Buwayhiyyah Dan Saljuq Serta Hubungannya Dengan Kekhalifahan ‘Abbasiyyah
    ISTIGHNA, Vol. 2, No 1, Januari 2019 P-ISSN 1979-2824 Homepage: http://e-journal.stit-islamic-village.ac.id/index.php/istighna Mokhammad Ainul Yaqin Dinasti Buwayhiyyah dan Saljuq: Kebijakan Politik dan Orientasi Keagamaan serta Hubungannya dengan Kekhalifahan ‘Abbasiyyah KEBIJAKAN POLITIK DAN ORIENTASI KEAGAMAAN DINASTI BUWAYHIYYAH DAN SALJUQ SERTA HUBUNGANNYA DENGAN KEKHALIFAHAN ‘ABBASIYYAH Mokhammad Ainul Yaqin ([email protected]) Dosen Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang Abstract: Policy during the Adud in the past year 977 M. has managed to unite the tiny kingdoms that has emerged since the reign of the Buwayhid in Persia and Iraq. Religious orientation during the reign of Mu’iz al-Dawlah was participating by Shi’ah Zaidiyyah. Another case with the reign of the ‘Izz al-Dawlah and ad}ud al-Dawlah participating Shi’ah Imamiyyah. While the relationship between the Buwayhid with ‘Abbasiyah dynasty is there are linkages between the two. Policy during the reign of the Seljuk dynasty is expanding its territory from Kasygar up to Yerussalem and from Constantinopel up to Kaspia ocean. Besides its religious orientation under the Seljuk dynasty is the Sunni Islam. While the relationship between the Buwayhid with Abbasiyah dynasty it is because of the factor similarity participating and relation marriage, so they have an emotional closeness and influence of Abbasid empire. Keyword: Policy, Religious orientation, relationship between the with ‘Abbasiyah. A. Pendahuluan Setelah dinasti ‘Abbasiyyah mengalami kemunduran dan kehancuran, maka menunjukkan bahwa masa itu adalah masa disintegrasi. Masa ini adalah masa munculnya dinasti-dinasti kecil dibarat maupun ditimur Baghdad yang berusaha melepaskan diri atau otonomi dan masa perebutan kekuasaan oleh dinasti Buwayhiyyah dari Persia dan dinasti Saljuq dari Turki di pusat pemerintahan Bani ‘Abbas di Baghdad, sehingga mengakibatkan fungsi Khalifah sebagai gelar simbolis bagi kekuasaan di dalam kerajaan Islam.
    [Show full text]
  • Xvi. Yüzyil Anadolusu'nda Oğuz Boylarinin
    Ç.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt 26, Sayı 3, 2017, Sayfa 45-59 XVI. YÜZYIL ANADOLUSU’NDA OĞUZ BOYLARININ YERLEŞTİKLERİ YERLERİN SANCAKLARA DAĞILIMI Mehibe ŞAHBAZ* ÖZ Coğrafi konumu itibarıyla Anadolu tarihin her safahatında pek çok milletin ilgisini çekmiş ve bu yüzden dolayı da sayısız istilalara sahne olmuştur. Değişik din ve kültürlerin etkisi altında kalmıştır. Ancak bu istila ve kültür değişiklerinden hiç biri XI. yüzyılda başlayan ve Anadolu’nun Türkleşmesi ve İslâmlaşması ile sonuçlanan Oğuz (Türkmen) istilası kadar derin izler bırakamamıştır. Türk’ler tarihte birçok kollara ayrılır, Bu kollardan birisi olan Oğuz (Türkmen) adıyla bilinen kitlenin göç etmesi ve Anadolu’ya yerleşmesi, Büyük Selçuklu İmparatorluğu’ndaki siyasî ve demografik gelişmeleriyle ilgilidir. Bu gelişmeleri daha iyi anlayabilmek için Oğuzların Anadolu’ya gelmeden önceki durumlarına ve Anadolu’ya doğru yönelmelerinin sebeplerine kısada olsa temas etmek gerekir. Göktürk ve Uygur devletlerinin önemli bir unsuru olan Oğuzların boy teşkilatları, Selçuklu ve Osmanlı döneminde hüküm sürdükleri yerlere kültürlerini, gelenek ve göreneklerinin yanı sıra ruhi davranışlarını da getirerek, yerleştikleri bölgelerde mensup oldukları boyun oymağının adıyla anılmaktadırlar. Çalışmamızda Oğuzların Anadolu’ya nereden ve ne sebeple göç ettiğini ele almanın ötesinde başta Anadolu olmak üzere Oğuzların değişik coğrafyaları yurt edinmeleri üzerinde durulmuştur. X. asırdan XVI. asır’a kadar Anadolu’da yaşayan Oğuz boylarına mensup oymakların adlarının sancaklara dağılımını ulaşabildiğimiz kaynakların ışığı altında tespit etmeye çalıştık. Anahtar kelimeler: Oğuz, Türkmen, Boy, Yerleşim, Anadolu 16th CENTURY ANATOLIA OGHUZ TRIBES SETTLED TO STARBOARD OF THE PLACES DISTRIBUTION ABSTRACT Due to its geographical location, Anatolia has attracted many nations at every pace of history, and due to this, countless invasions have been the scene.
    [Show full text]
  • Al-'Usur Al-Wusta, Volume 23 (2015)
    AL-ʿUṢŪR AL-WUSṬĀ 23 (2015) THE JOURNAL OF MIDDLE EAST MEDIEVALISTS About Middle East Medievalists (MEM) is an international professional non-profit association of scholars interested in the study of the Islamic lands of the Middle East during the medieval period (defined roughly as 500-1500 C.E.). MEM officially came into existence on 15 November 1989 at its first annual meeting, held ni Toronto. It is a non-profit organization incorporated in the state of Illinois. MEM has two primary goals: to increase the representation of medieval scholarship at scholarly meetings in North America and elsewhere by co-sponsoring panels; and to foster communication among individuals and organizations with an interest in the study of the medieval Middle East. As part of its effort to promote scholarship and facilitate communication among its members, MEM publishes al-ʿUṣūr al-Wusṭā (The Journal of Middle East Medievalists). EDITORS Antoine Borrut, University of Maryland Matthew S. Gordon, Miami University MANAGING EDITOR Christiane-Marie Abu Sarah, University of Maryland EDITORIAL BOARD, BOARD OF DIRECTORS, AL-ʿUṢŪR AL-WUSṬĀ (THE JOURNAL OF MIDDLE EAST MEDIEVALISTS) MIDDLE EAST MEDIEVALISTS Zayde Antrim, Trinity College President Sobhi Bourdebala, University of Tunis Matthew S. Gordon, Miami University Muriel Debié, École Pratique des Hautes Études Malika Dekkiche, University of Antwerp Vice-President Fred M. Donner, University of Chicago Sarah Bowen Savant, Aga Khan University David Durand-Guédy, Institut Français de Recherche en Iran and Research
    [Show full text]