Changes in the Rpb3 Interactome Caused by the Deletion of Rpb9

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Changes in the Rpb3 Interactome Caused by the Deletion of Rpb9 CHANGES IN THE RPB3 INTERACTOME CAUSED BY THE DELETION OF RPB9 IN SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE Eric A Talbert Submitted to the faculty of the University Graduate School in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Indiana University August 2016 Accepted by the Graduate Faculty, Indiana University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Master’s Thesis Committee ________________________________________ Amber L. Mosley, PhD. Chair ________________________________________ Mark G. Goebl, PhD. ________________________________________ Andy Hudmon, PhD ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to extend my heartfelt thanks to the following people for their aid completing this project. It would not have been possible without their help. To Dr. Amber Mosley- For taking me in and helping me make the best of a bad situation, and for being patient and kind when that was the most important thing in the world. To Dr. Mark Goebl- For being a constant source of guidance and mentorship throughout my time with the Biochemistry Department. To Dr. Andy Hudmon- For being a teacher and mentor, and also a friend. To my colleagues in the Mosley Lab, Whitney Smith-Kinnaman, Dr. Melanie Fox, Dr. Jerry Hunter, Sarah Peck, and Jose Victorino- For your help and instruction, as well as the use of your data. To my parents, Larry and Margaret Talbert- For your unwavering love and support throughout my life. To my sister, Dr. Erin Talbert- For your advice and mentorship, and for lending an ear when I needed one. iii Eric A Talbert CHANGES IN THE RPB3 INTERACTOME CAUSED BY THE DELETION OF RPB9 IN SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE RNA Polymerase II (Pol II) is the primary actor in the transcription of mRNA from genes. Pol II is a complex composed of twelve protein subunits. This study focused on the changes in the interactome of Rbp3 in S. cerevisiae when the Pol II subunit Rpb9 is removed. Rpb3 is one of the core subunits of Pol II, and any significant changes to the Rpb3 incteractome due to the loss of Rpb9 can be used to infer new information about Rpb9’s role in the Pol II complex. Rpb3 was pulled down using FLAG purification from both wild type and rpb9Δ S. cerevisiae cultures. Rpb3 and the proteins complexed with it were then analyzed using multi-dimensional protein identification technology (MudPIT), a form of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). This data was searched using the SEQUEST database search algorithm, and the results were further analyzed for likelihood of interaction using Significance Analysis of INTeractome (SAINT), as well as for post-translational phosphorylation. Deletion of rpb9 did not present any changes in Pol II phosphorylation however it did cause several changes in the interaction network. The rpb9Δ strain showed new interactions with Rtr1, Sen1, Vtc4, Pyc1, Tgl4, Sec61, Tfb2, Hfd1, Erv25, Rib4, Sla1, Ubp15, Bbc1, and Hxk1. The most prominent of these hits are Rtr1, an Rpb1 C-terminal domain phosphatase linked to transcription termination, and Sen1, an RNA/DNA nuclease that terminates transcription. In addition, this mutant showed no interaction with Mtd1, an interaction that is present in the wild type. In all cases, these hits should be considered fuel for future research, rather than conclusive evidence of novel interactions. Amber L Mosley, PhD Chair iv TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................................... vi LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................. vii INTRODUCTION Genes and Gene Expression............................................................................................................. 1 Transcription .................................................................................................................................... 3 RNA Polymerase II Function ............................................................................................................. 9 MATERIALS AND METHODS Bioinformatics ................................................................................................................................ 13 Affinity Purification ........................................................................................................................ 13 Multidimensional Protein Identification Technology .................................................................... 14 Peptide Spectra Analysis ................................................................................................................ 16 Significance Analysis of INTeractome ............................................................................................ 16 Isolation of Protein Fraction from FLAG Tagged S. cerevisiae ....................................................... 17 Pull-Down and Digestion of Protein Fraction ................................................................................ 18 MudPIT Analysis ............................................................................................................................. 18 Analysis of MS/MS Spectra ............................................................................................................ 19 RESULTS Phosphorylation Analysis ............................................................................................................... 21 SAINT Analysis of Pol II ................................................................................................................... 22 Significant Hits from SAINT Analysis .............................................................................................. 25 DISCUSSION ................................................................................................................................... 30 CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................................. 40 APPENDIX 1: SAINT TABLE ............................................................................................................ 41 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................... 74 CURRICULUM VITAE v LIST OF TABLES 1. Selected Actors in mRNA Transcription .................................................................................... 12 2. Reagents and Media ................................................................................................................. 18 vi LIST OF FIGURES 1. Transcription of Messenger RNA ................................................................................................ 4 2. Initiation of Messenger RNA Transcription ................................................................................. 6 3. Changes in Phosphorylation State of Serine-5 of the RNA Polymerase II CTD Heptapeptide .... 8 4. Schematic of RNA Polymerase II Holoenzyme .......................................................................... 11 5. Schematics of Wild Type and rpb9Δ Pol II ................................................................................ 24 6. SP Values of WT and rpb9Δ strains for Pol II Subunits and Significant Hits .............................. 24 7. Changes in the Protein Network of Rpb3 between Wild Type and rp9Δ Cells ......................... 31 vii INTRODUCTION Genes and Gene Expression Transcription is the process of transforming genetic information stored within DNA into functional RNA molecules. These molecules perform a variety of roles within the cell, from structural and catalytic functions in ribosomes to blueprints for the synthesis of proteins. In all cases, however, transcription starts with a DNA template. DNA is a polymer of nucleotides that serves as the primary information storage medium for living cells. DNA chains form a distinctive double-helix shape, with two phospho-sugar chains linked together by nitrogenous bases, forming a set of rungs on the twisted ladder of the DNA molecule. The sequence of these base pairs makes up a code that contains the actual genetic information stored within DNA (Watson, 1953). A section of DNA that codes for a specific functional product is called a gene. Genes are the primary target of transcription. Genes can be divided into several sections based on function. Most notable of these is the transcribed region, which is the stretch of DNA that is copied during transcription. The first point of the transcribed region is called the transcription start site (TSS). Promoters are regions upstream of the TSS that interact directly or indirectly with the transcription complex, the group of proteins that, when bound together, perform transcription (Bayev, 1980). Most genes contain a core promoter region just upstream of the TSS. This is the binding site of the preinitiation complex, a grouping of proteins that work together to initiate transcription. Along with this core promoter, many promoter regions also contain enhancer elements that are bound by transcriptional activators, which are other proteins that encourage transcription of the gene (Bran, 1985). 1 Much of an organism’s genome functions to regulate gene expression, or how and when genes are transcribed. In addition to transcriptional activators discussed above, some of this control comes from how DNA molecules are organized into structures called chromosomes.
Recommended publications
  • Analysis of Gene Expression Data for Gene Ontology
    ANALYSIS OF GENE EXPRESSION DATA FOR GENE ONTOLOGY BASED PROTEIN FUNCTION PREDICTION A Thesis Presented to The Graduate Faculty of The University of Akron In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Robert Daniel Macholan May 2011 ANALYSIS OF GENE EXPRESSION DATA FOR GENE ONTOLOGY BASED PROTEIN FUNCTION PREDICTION Robert Daniel Macholan Thesis Approved: Accepted: _______________________________ _______________________________ Advisor Department Chair Dr. Zhong-Hui Duan Dr. Chien-Chung Chan _______________________________ _______________________________ Committee Member Dean of the College Dr. Chien-Chung Chan Dr. Chand K. Midha _______________________________ _______________________________ Committee Member Dean of the Graduate School Dr. Yingcai Xiao Dr. George R. Newkome _______________________________ Date ii ABSTRACT A tremendous increase in genomic data has encouraged biologists to turn to bioinformatics in order to assist in its interpretation and processing. One of the present challenges that need to be overcome in order to understand this data more completely is the development of a reliable method to accurately predict the function of a protein from its genomic information. This study focuses on developing an effective algorithm for protein function prediction. The algorithm is based on proteins that have similar expression patterns. The similarity of the expression data is determined using a novel measure, the slope matrix. The slope matrix introduces a normalized method for the comparison of expression levels throughout a proteome. The algorithm is tested using real microarray gene expression data. Their functions are characterized using gene ontology annotations. The results of the case study indicate the protein function prediction algorithm developed is comparable to the prediction algorithms that are based on the annotations of homologous proteins.
    [Show full text]
  • Inducible Gene Expression: Diverse Regulatory Mechanisms
    REVIEWS MODES OF TRANSCRIPTIONAL REGULATION Inducible gene expression: diverse regulatory mechanisms Vikki M. Weake and Jerry L. Workman Abstract | The rapid activation of gene expression in response to stimuli occurs largely through the regulation of RNA polymerase II‑dependent transcription. In this Review, we discuss events that occur during the transcription cycle in eukaryotes that are important for the rapid and specific activation of gene expression in response to external stimuli. In addition to regulated recruitment of the transcription machinery to the promoter, it has now been shown that control steps can include chromatin remodelling and the release of paused polymerase. Recent work suggests that some components of signal transduction cascades also play an integral part in activating transcription at target genes. Chromatin Cells must be able to rapidly respond to changes in RNA polymerase II (Pol II)‑dependent transcription. A nucleoprotein structure their external environment — such as temperature or Although a traditional model of activator‑dependent formed of repeating nutrient availability — to exploit and survive in new recruitment of Pol II and the general transcription nucleosomal units in which conditions. Even cells in a multicellular organism need factors (GTFs) holds true for many inducible genes, 147 base pairs of DNA are wrapped around an octamer of to respond to developmental cues such as signalling recent studies suggest that Pol II is already present and 1–6 histone proteins consisting molecules to determine when to divide, migrate or poised for transcription at many inducible genes . of an H3–H4 tetramer flanked die. The production of new proteins in response to Therefore, it is becoming increasingly apparent that by two H2A–H2B dimers external stimuli results largely from rapid activation there is an additional level of regulation that occurs of gene transcription — this is known as inducible during the initial stages of transcription elongation Co-activator A protein that is recruited to gene expression.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamic Molecular Linkers of the Genome: the First Decade of SMC Proteins
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on October 8, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press REVIEW Dynamic molecular linkers of the genome: the first decade of SMC proteins Ana Losada1 and Tatsuya Hirano2,3 1Spanish National Cancer Center (CNIO), Madrid E-28029, Spain; 2Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York 11724, USA Structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) proteins in eukaryotes. The proposed actions of cohesin and con- are chromosomal ATPases, highly conserved from bac- densins offer a plausible, if not complete, explanation for teria to humans, that play fundamental roles in many the sudden appearance of thread-like “substances” (the aspects of higher-order chromosome organization and chromosomes) and their longitudinal splitting during dynamics. In eukaryotes, SMC1 and SMC3 act as the mitosis, first described by Walther Flemming (1882). core of the cohesin complexes that mediate sister chro- Remarkably, SMC proteins are conserved among the matid cohesion, whereas SMC2 and SMC4 function as three phyla of life, indicating that the basic strategy of the core of the condensin complexes that are essential chromosome organization may be evolutionarily con- for chromosome assembly and segregation. Another served from bacteria to humans. An emerging theme is complex containing SMC5 and SMC6 is implicated in that SMC proteins are dynamic molecular linkers of the DNA repair and checkpoint responses. The SMC com- genome that actively fold, tether, and manipulate DNA plexes form unique ring- or V-shaped structures with strands. Their diverse functions range far beyond chro- long coiled-coil arms, and function as ATP-modulated, mosome segregation, and involve nearly all aspects of dynamic molecular linkers of the genome.
    [Show full text]
  • Rps3/Us3 Promotes Mrna Binding at the 40S Ribosome Entry Channel
    Rps3/uS3 promotes mRNA binding at the 40S ribosome PNAS PLUS entry channel and stabilizes preinitiation complexes at start codons Jinsheng Donga, Colin Echeverría Aitkenb, Anil Thakura, Byung-Sik Shina, Jon R. Lorschb,1, and Alan G. Hinnebuscha,1 aLaboratory of Gene Regulation and Development, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892; and bLaboratory on the Mechanism and Regulation of Protein Synthesis, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892 Contributed by Alan G. Hinnebusch, January 24, 2017 (sent for review December 15, 2016; reviewed by Jamie H. D. Cate and Matthew S. Sachs) Met The eukaryotic 43S preinitiation complex (PIC) bearing Met-tRNAi rearrangement to PIN at both near-cognate start codons (e.g., in a ternary complex (TC) with eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF)2-GTP UUG) and cognate (AUG) codons in poor Kozak context; hence scans the mRNA leader for an AUG codon in favorable “Kozak” eIF1 must dissociate from the 40S subunit for start-codon rec- context. AUG recognition provokes rearrangement from an open ognition (Fig. 1A). Consistent with this, structural analyses of PIC conformation with TC bound in a state not fully engaged with partial PICs reveal that eIF1 and eIF1A promote rotation of the “ ” the P site ( POUT ) to a closed, arrested conformation with TC tightly 40S head relative to the body (2, 3), thought to be instrumental bound in the “P ” state. Yeast ribosomal protein Rps3/uS3 resides IN in TC binding in the POUT conformation, but that eIF1 physically in the mRNA entry channel of the 40S subunit and contacts mRNA Met clashes with Met-tRNAi in the PIN state (2, 4), and is both via conserved residues whose functional importance was unknown.
    [Show full text]
  • (TEX) Genes: a Review Focused on Spermatogenesis and Male Fertility
    Bellil et al. Basic and Clinical Andrology (2021) 31:9 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12610-021-00127-7 REVIEW ARTICLE Open Access Human testis-expressed (TEX) genes: a review focused on spermatogenesis and male fertility Hela Bellil1, Farah Ghieh2,3, Emeline Hermel2,3, Béatrice Mandon-Pepin2,3 and François Vialard1,2,3* Abstract Spermatogenesis is a complex process regulated by a multitude of genes. The identification and characterization of male-germ-cell-specific genes is crucial to understanding the mechanisms through which the cells develop. The term “TEX gene” was coined by Wang et al. (Nat Genet. 2001; 27: 422–6) after they used cDNA suppression subtractive hybridization (SSH) to identify new transcripts that were present only in purified mouse spermatogonia. TEX (Testis expressed) orthologues have been found in other vertebrates (mammals, birds, and reptiles), invertebrates, and yeasts. To date, 69 TEX genes have been described in different species and different tissues. To evaluate the expression of each TEX/tex gene, we compiled data from 7 different RNA-Seq mRNA databases in humans, and 4 in the mouse according to the expression atlas database. Various studies have highlighted a role for many of these genes in spermatogenesis. Here, we review current knowledge on the TEX genes and their roles in spermatogenesis and fertilization in humans and, comparatively, in other species (notably the mouse). As expected, TEX genes appear to have a major role in reproduction in general and in spermatogenesis in humans but also in all mammals such as the mouse. Most of them are expressed specifically or predominantly in the testis.
    [Show full text]
  • A Genome-Wide Screen for Genes Affecting Spontaneous Direct-Repeat Recombination In
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.11.943795; this version posted February 11, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 A genome-wide screen for genes affecting spontaneous direct-repeat recombination in 2 Saccharomyces cerevisiae 3 4 5 Daniele Novarina*, Ridhdhi Desai†, Jessica A. Vaisica†, Jiongwen Ou†, Mohammed Bellaoui†,1, 6 Grant W. Brown†,2 and Michael Chang*,3 7 8 *European Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University of Groningen, University 9 Medical Center Groningen, 9713 AV Groningen, the Netherlands 10 †Department of Biochemistry and Donnelly Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 11 3E1, Canada 12 13 1Current address: Genetics Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University Mohammed 14 Premier, Oujda, Morocco 15 16 2Co-corresponding author: Department of Biochemistry and Donnelly Centre, University of 17 Toronto, 160 College Street, Toronto, ON M5S 3E1 Canada. E-mail: [email protected] 18 3Co-corresponding author: European Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University of 19 Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV Groningen, 20 the Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected] 21 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.11.943795; this version posted February 11, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
    [Show full text]
  • A Computational and Evolutionary Approach to Understanding Cryptic Unstable Transcripts in Yeast
    A Computational and Evolutionary Approach to Understanding Cryptic Unstable Transcripts in Yeast By Jessica M. Vera B.S. University of Wisconsin-Madison, 2007 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology 2015 This thesis entitled: A Computational and Evolutionary Approach to Understanding Cryptic Unstable Transcripts in Yeast written by Jessica M. Vera has been approved for the Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology Tom Blumenthal Robin Dowell Date The final copy of this thesis has been examined by the signatories, and we find that both the content and the form meet acceptable presentation standards of scholarly work in the above mentioned discipline iii Vera, Jessica M. (Ph.D., Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology) A Computational and Evolutionary Approach to Understanding Cryptic Unstable Transcripts in Yeast Thesis Directed by Robin Dowell Cryptic unstable transcripts (CUTs) are a largely unexplored class of nuclear exosome degraded, non-coding RNAs in budding yeast. It is highly debated whether CUT transcription has a functional role in the cell or whether CUTs represent noise in the yeast transcriptome. I sought to ascertain the extent of conserved CUT expression across a variety of Saccharomyces yeast strains to further understand and characterize the nature of CUT expression. To this end I designed a Hidden Markov Model (HMM) to analyze strand-specific RNA sequencing data from nuclear exosome rrp6Δ mutants to identify and compare CUTs in four different yeast strains: S288c, Σ1278b, JAY291 (S.cerevisiae) and N17 (S.paradoxus).
    [Show full text]
  • PAR-CLIP Data Indicate That Nrd1-Nab3
    Webb et al. Genome Biology 2014, 15:R8 http://genomebiology.com/2014/15/1/R8 RESEARCH Open Access PAR-CLIP data indicate that Nrd1-Nab3-dependent transcription termination regulates expression of hundreds of protein coding genes in yeast Shaun Webb2, Ralph D Hector1, Grzegorz Kudla3 and Sander Granneman1,2* Abstract Background: Nrd1 and Nab3 are essential sequence-specific yeast RNA binding proteins that function as a heterodimer in the processing and degradation of diverse classes of RNAs. These proteins also regulate several mRNA coding genes; however, it remains unclear exactly what percentage of the mRNA component of the transcriptome these proteins control. To address this question, we used the pyCRAC software package developed in our laboratory to analyze CRAC and PAR-CLIP data for Nrd1-Nab3-RNA interactions. Results: We generated high-resolution maps of Nrd1-Nab3-RNA interactions, from which we have uncovered hundreds of new Nrd1-Nab3 mRNA targets, representing between 20 and 30% of protein-coding transcripts. Although Nrd1 and Nab3 showed a preference for binding near 5′ ends of relatively short transcripts, they bound transcripts throughout coding sequences and 3′ UTRs. Moreover, our data for Nrd1-Nab3 binding to 3′ UTRs was consistent with a role for these proteins in the termination of transcription. Our data also support a tight integration of Nrd1-Nab3 with the nutrient response pathway. Finally, we provide experimental evidence for some of our predictions, using northern blot and RT-PCR assays. Conclusions: Collectively, our data support the notion that Nrd1 and Nab3 function is tightly integrated with the nutrient response and indicate a role for these proteins in the regulation of many mRNA coding genes.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Program Book
    PROGRAM BOOK Note that TAGC was cancelled and held online with a different schedule and program. This document serves as a record of the original program designed for the in-person meeting. April 22–26, 2020 Gaylord National Resort & Convention Center Metro Washington, DC TABLE OF CONTENTS About the GSA ........................................................................................................................................................ 3 Conference Organizers ...........................................................................................................................................4 General Information ...............................................................................................................................................7 Mobile App ....................................................................................................................................................7 Registration, Badges, and Pre-ordered T-shirts .............................................................................................7 Oral Presenters: Speaker Ready Room - Camellia 4.......................................................................................7 Poster Sessions and Exhibits - Prince George’s Exhibition Hall ......................................................................7 GSA Central - Booth 520 ................................................................................................................................8 Internet Access ..............................................................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • RNA Polymerase II CTD Phosphatase Rtr1 Fine-Tunes Transcription Termination
    PLOS GENETICS RESEARCH ARTICLE RNA Polymerase II CTD phosphatase Rtr1 fine-tunes transcription termination 1☯ 1☯ 1 Jose F. VictorinoID , Melanie J. FoxID , Whitney R. Smith-KinnamanID , Sarah A. Peck 1 1 1 1 1 JusticeID , Katlyn H. BurrissID , Asha K. Boyd , Megan A. Zimmerly , Rachel R. Chan , 1 2,3 1,3¤ Gerald O. Hunter , Yunlong LiuID , Amber L. MosleyID * 1 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America, 2 Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America, 3 Center for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America a1111111111 a1111111111 ☯ These authors contributed equally to this work. a1111111111 ¤ Current address: Amber L. Mosley, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Indiana University a1111111111 School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America a1111111111 * [email protected] Abstract OPEN ACCESS RNA Polymerase II (RNAPII) transcription termination is regulated by the phosphorylation Citation: Victorino JF, Fox MJ, Smith-Kinnaman status of the C-terminal domain (CTD). The phosphatase Rtr1 has been shown to regulate WR, Peck Justice SA, Burriss KH, Boyd AK, et al. serine 5 phosphorylation on the CTD; however, its role in the regulation of RNAPII termina- (2020) RNA Polymerase II CTD phosphatase Rtr1 tion has not been explored. As a consequence of RTR1 deletion, interactions within the ter- fine-tunes transcription termination. PLoS Genet mination machinery and between the termination machinery and RNAPII were altered as 16(3): e1008317. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Analysis of the Hsm3 Protein Function in Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Nub4 Complex
    G C A T T A C G G C A T genes Article Genetic Analysis of the Hsm3 Protein Function in Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae NuB4 Complex Tatiyana A. Evstyukhina 1,2, Elena A. Alekseeva 1,2,* , Dmitriy V. Fedorov 1, Vyacheslav T. Peshekhonov 1,2 and Vladimir G. Korolev 1,2 1 Laboratory of Eukaryotic Genetics, Department of Molecular and Radiation Biophysics, Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute Named by B.P. Konstantinov of National Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”, 188300 Gatchina, Russia; [email protected] (T.A.E.); [email protected] (D.V.F.); [email protected] (V.T.P.); [email protected] (V.G.K.) 2 Laboratory of Molecular Genetic and Recombination Technologies, Kurchatov Genome Center— Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, mkr. Orlova Roscha 1, Leningrad District, 188300 Gatchina, Russia * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: In the nuclear compartment of yeast, NuB4 core complex consists of three proteins, Hat1, Hat2, and Hif1, and interacts with a number of other factors. In particular, it was shown that NuB4 complex physically interacts with Hsm3p. Early we demonstrated that the gene HSM3 participates in the control of replicative and reparative spontaneous mutagenesis, and that hsm3D mutants increase the frequency of mutations induced by different mutagens. It was previously believed that the HSM3 gene controlled only some minor repair processes in the cell, but later it was suggested that it had a chaperone function with its participation in proteasome assembly. In this work, we analyzed the properties of three hsm3D, hif1D, and hat1D mutants. The results obtained showed that the Citation: Evstyukhina, T.A.; Hsm3 protein may be a functional subunit of NuB4 complex.
    [Show full text]
  • Constructing and Analyzing Biological Interaction Networks for Knowledge Discovery
    Constructing and Analyzing Biological Interaction Networks for Knowledge Discovery Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Duygu Ucar Graduate Program in Computer Science and Engineering The Ohio State University 2009 Dissertation Committee: Srinivasan Parthasarathy, Advisor Yusu Wang Umit Catalyurek c Copyright by Duygu Ucar 2009 ABSTRACT Many biological datasets can be effectively modeled as interaction networks where nodes represent biological entities of interest such as proteins, genes, or complexes and edges mimic associations among them. The study of these biological network structures can provide insight into many biological questions including the functional characterization of genes and gene products, the characterization of DNA-protein bindings, and the under- standing of regulatory mechanisms. Therefore, the task of constructing biological interac- tion networks from raw data sets and exploiting information from these networks is critical, but is also fraught with challenges. First, the network structure is not always known in a priori; the structure should be inferred from raw and heterogeneous biological data sources. Second, biological networks are noisy (containing unreliable interactions) and incomplete (missing real interactions) which makes the task of extracting useful information difficult. Third, typically these networks have non-trivial topological properties (e.g., uneven degree distribution, small world) that limit the effectiveness of traditional knowledge discovery al- gorithms. Fourth, these networks are usually dynamic and investigation of their dynamics is essential to understand the underlying biological system. In this thesis, we address these issues by presenting a set of computational techniques that we developed to construct and analyze three specific types of biological interaction networks: protein-protein interaction networks, gene co-expression networks, and regulatory networks.
    [Show full text]