DOCSLIB.ORG

Nineteenth-Century British Child Law and Literature

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nineteenth-Century British Child Law and Literature City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 9-2015 Knowing Children/Children Knowing: Nineteenth-Century British Child Law and Literature Donna Paparella Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/1085 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] KNOWING CHILDREN/CHILDREN KNOWING: NINETEENTH-CENTURY BRITISH CHILD LAW AND LITERATURE by DONNA PAPARELLA A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in English in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of English, The City University of New York 2015 Paparella ii © 2015 DONNA PAPARELLA All Rights Reserved Paparella iii This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in English to satisfy the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Talia Schaffer ___________________ ______________________ Date Chair of Examining Committee Mario DiGangi ___________________ ______________________ Date Executive Officer Talia Schaffer Rachel Brownstein Anne Humpherys Supervisory Committee THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK Paparella iv Abstract KNOWING CHILDREN/CHILDREN KNOWING: NINETEENTH-CENTURY BRITISH CHILD LAW AND LITERATURE by Donna Paparella Adviser: Professor Talia Schaffer Why are nineteenth-century literary narratives filled with children’s accounts of bad parents, dead parents, absent parents, and surrogate parents? What are the origins of our current preoccupation with children as evidenced, for example, in Ian McEwan’s new novel, The Children Act; New York State’s recent amendments to the name and role of “Attorney for the Child”; and today’s vehement debates over parenting styles? The mid-nineteenth century was a period of intense preoccupation with “the child”: it engendered family law; it generated an explosion of representations of children in art and literature; and it witnessed the beginnings of the scientific study of childhood. Knowing Children/Children Knowing: Nineteenth-Century British Child Law and Literature pursues the relatively uncharted relation between nineteenth- century Anglo-American child law reform and Victorian literary representations of childhood and childhood consciousness, arguing that this relation is the origin of our present concerns. Examining issues of childhood and personhood, freedom, and choice, and using primary literary, legal, and historical sources, I argue that novelists and autobiographers used changes in the law as a creative opportunity, engaging legal debates about children in their plots, in their forms, and in their portrayals of childhood. These narratives, when read in their historical context, mark a Paparella v change in the understanding and representation of childhood that anticipate contemporary thinking about child welfare. Correlatively, these historical roots give us a lens through which to see and understand formal literary invention. This project begins to fill a gap in the disciplinary intersection of Victorian family law and literature. In a 2007 Victorian Literature and Culture review of law and literature criticism, Simon Petch proclaimed that “Victorian Studies seems to have gained very little from the Law and Literature movement,” because of the movement’s narrow focus on a handful of texts. Much law and literature criticism has two main issues: it is oftentimes ahistorical and, as Petch points out, it treats “literature” as “culture.” For example, Kieran Dolin’s work is based on his assumption that law, like literature, is a fiction. Ian Ward, writing “as a member of the legal academy,” notes that the “‘law and literature’ movement has been nurtured in the main, from within this academy,” and challenges literary scholars to take up this relationship. Although there has been work on divorce law in the nineteenth century and much work done on “the child” by literary critics, these two are rarely considered together: custody law is most often viewed as a by-product of divorce reform and understood primarily as an expansion of a wife's rights developed by Victorian suffragism. Likewise, in this context, literary representations of the child are often treated as part of the marriage and/or divorce plot or of “the woman question.” I present an alternative history, arguing that literary treatments of the child are primary and generative: the child is not secondary to these other plots but offers us another plot entirely. Child-centric literature participates in new ways of thinking about and structuring families and new ways of organizing narrative form. Maintaining the differences between legal and literary discourses, I read a reciprocal relationship between law and literature concerning children: child-centric literature is both influenced by child law and influences child law. As the law recognized that Paparella vi children have a voice and that childhood interests exist, literature gave expression to the child’s voice and interests. The history of custody law shows us that there is a rhetoric of personhood that developed with specific applications to childhood, which has to do both with the child as such, as well as with the symbolic nature of the child as a figure of fundamental human being-ness. At the same time that the law acknowledged childhood subjectivity, it also considered children as dependents and in need of protection. In response, the court became parens patriae—literally, “parent of the nation”—displacing biological parents. By the early twentieth century the conception of the child changed from that of an object of possession to (paradoxically) that of an object in need of guardianship who is also a subject: as a result, children’s lives became regulated by the state more than by their parents. The literary works I am examining have a stake in making adults understand the child’s perspective and, in doing so, invite the reader to use this as the key to understanding one’s own development. Childhood became necessary; it needed to be protected and managed because it was essential in formulating personhood in both real and symbolic ways. As such, childhood is a crucial component of modern identity itself. Paparella vii Acknowledgments I am so fortunate to have worked with a dream dissertation committee and I am incredibly grateful to them. My advisor, Talia Schaffer, is a true mentor. Her profound generosity, encouragement, and intelligence have infused every page of this project. It has been a privilege to work with Rachel Brownstein, who has read everything and knows everything. Anne Humpherys’s exacting readings of my early work on this project set the highest standards. I am grateful to my dear friends Kirsten Tranter, Tanya Agathocleous, and Bob Bettendorf, who have sustained me with their friendship, love, and intellectual and emotional support over many years. Bob Bettendorf read a portion of this project in the meticulous way that only he can do. My thanks to Jeremy Glick for his early input and continued interest in this work. I thank my colleagues in office 1436 at Hunter College, who have made daily life and work infinitely happier, especially Jason Ueda, Josh Ginsberg, Jen Mitchell, Joost Burgers, Kathryn Narramore, and Liz Goetz. Thank you to my friend, Barbara Wilding, who, when I was at a crossroads in my life, gave me the advice I needed to take on this project. I also wish to thank my family—Linda, Anthony, Phoebe, Eileen, and my father—for their enthusiasm and support for my work. My mother and grandparents would be very proud. Most of all, I am grateful to my son, Sam, who has made my life and writing more meaningful, worthwhile, and wonderful than anything I could ever have imagined. I dedicate this to him. Paparella viii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. The Empire of the Child: British Court Intervention in Nineteenth-Century Custody Law 1 2. Inventing Motherhood: Moral Crimes and the Maternal Plot 44 3. Splitting the Baby: What Maisie Knew about Joint Custody 92 4. “O how I do hate that Law”: Rewriting the Law of the Father 137 Epilogue: Our Children/Ourselves 185 Bibliography 192 Paparella 1 1. The Empire of the Child: British Court Intervention in Nineteenth-Century Custody Law The legal power of a father,—for a mother, as such, is entitled to no power, but only to reverence and respect; the power of a father, I say, over the persons of his children ceases at the age of twenty-one: for they are then enfranchised by arriving at years of discretion, or that point which the law has established, as some must necessarily be established, when the empire of the father, or other guardian, gives place to the empire of reason. Yet, till that age arrives, this empire of the father continues even after his death; for he may by his will appoint a guardian to his children. (William Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England, 1765) The first education is the most important and this first education belongs incontestably to women; if the Author of nature had wanted it to belong to men, He would have given them milk with which to nurse the children . The laws—always so occupied with property and so little with persons, because their object is peace not virtue—do not give enough authority to mothers. However their status is more certain than that of fathers; their duties are more painful; their cares are more important for the good order of the family; generally they are more attached to the children. Fathers’ ambition, avarice, tyranny, and false foresight, their negligence, their harsh insensitivity are a hundred times more disastrous for children than is the blind tenderness of mothers. (Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Emile, 1762) The next century will be the century of the child, just as this century has been the women’s century.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Annual Survey of Virginia Law: Legal Issues Involving Children Robert E
    University of Richmond Law Review Volume 22 | Issue 4 Article 11 1988 Annual Survey of Virginia Law: Legal Issues Involving Children Robert E. Shepherd Jr. University of Richmond Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/lawreview Part of the Juvenile Law Commons Recommended Citation Robert E. Shepherd Jr., Annual Survey of Virginia Law: Legal Issues Involving Children, 22 U. Rich. L. Rev. 691 (1988). Available at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/lawreview/vol22/iss4/11 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School Journals at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Richmond Law Review by an authorized editor of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LEGAL ISSUES INVOLVING CHILDREN Robert E. Shepherd, Jr.* I. ABUSE AND NEGLECT, FOSTER CARE AND TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS A. Abuse and Neglect This article last year noted the disturbing increase in the num- ber of reported cases involving individuals prosecuted for the sex- ual abuse of children, and the persistence of legislative efforts to address the profound difficulties encountered by young children called as witnesses in those cases." This year, the General Assem- bly finally yielded to the urgings of those seeking changes in the law, and to the recommendations of a joint legislative subcommit- tee created in 1987 to study the problem of child abuse victims as witnesses in the courtroom.2 The subcommittee recommended the enactment of four bills in an effort to minimize the adverse impact of the courtroom atmosphere on young children who testify in child abuse cases while trying, at the same time, to protect the le- gitimate rights of the person accused of abuse.3 All four of the pro- posed bills were enacted into law with few amendments.
    [Show full text]
  • Shared Parenting Laws: Mistakes of Pooling? Margaret F
    Notre Dame Law School NDLScholarship Journal Articles Publications 2014 Shared Parenting Laws: Mistakes of Pooling? Margaret F. Brinig Notre Dame Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/law_faculty_scholarship Part of the Family Law Commons Recommended Citation Margaret F. Brinig, Shared Parenting Laws: Mistakes of Pooling?, Notre Dame Legal Studies Paper No. 1426 (August 14, 2014). Available at: https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/law_faculty_scholarship/1116 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Publications at NDLScholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of NDLScholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Shared Parenting Laws: Mistakes of Pooling? Margaret F. Brinig, Notre Dame Law School In their recent paper “Anti-Herding Regulation,” forthcoming in the Harvard Business Review,1 Ian Ayres and Joshua Mitts argue that many well-intentioned public policy regulations potentially harm rather than help situations. That is, because the rules seek to pool—or herd—groups of people, treating them as equal, they miss or mask important differences among the regulated, thus magnifying systematic risk. Anti- herding regulation, on the other hand, can produce socially beneficial information, in their words steering “both private and public actors toward better evidence-based outcomes.” Left to their own, or with various carrot-and-stick incentives, some groups, anyway, would instead fare better if allowed to separate or diverge. Ayres and Mitts buttress their case with examples from engineering (bridges collapsing because soldiers crossed them in cadences matched to the structures’ oscillations), finance (mandating only low percentages down for real estate purchasers), biodiversity and ecosystem stability, and genetic variation itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Creating Parenting Plans Presentation
    Custody must be awarded to “such person as will best promote the interest and welfare of the child.” Court may grant: ◦ Joint custody to the parents ◦ Exclusive custody to one person ◦ Custody to two or more persons 1 Order shall include such terms, including visitation as will best promote the interest and welfare of the child Visitation is a “lesser form of custody” ◦ Clark v. Clark, 294 NC 554 (1978) Order should establish the time, place and conditions for exercising visitation. ◦ Ingle v. Ingle, 53 NC App 227 (1981) Between mother and father, no presumption shall apply as to who will better promote the interest and welfare of the child ◦ GS 50-13.2 Parent cannot be denied reasonable visitation unless court finds parent unfit or that visitation is not in best interest of the child ◦ GS 50-13.5(i) ◦ Supervised visitation is not “reasonable visitation” Hinkle v. Hartsell, 131 NC App 833 (1998) Cannot allow custodial parent to control visitation ◦ Brewington v. Serrato, 77 N.C.App. 726, 336 S.E.2d 444 (1985) Physical Custody ◦ No definition in statutes or cases Legal Custody ◦ Right and responsibility to make decisions with important and long-term implications for a child’s best interest and welfare ◦ Includes “education, health care, religious training and the like.” Diehl v. Diehl, 177 NC App 642 (2006) No presumptions regarding legal custody Order should be specific 2 Must be considered “upon request of either party” ◦ GS 50-13.2 There is no presumption in favor of joint custody ◦ Hall v. Hall, 655 SE2d 901, n3 (NC App, Feb.
    [Show full text]
  • Children's Participation in Child Protection
    CHILDREN’S PARTICIPATION IN CHILD PROTECTION Tool 4 www.keepingchildrensafe.org.uk Copyright © Keeping Children Safe Coalition 2011 Graphics & Layout www.ideenweberei.com Produced by the Keeping Children Safe Coalition Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................2 Module One: Children recognise what is child abuse ................................................................................10 Exercise 1.1: Children’s rights .............................................................................................. 11 Exercise 1.2: Feeling safe and unsafe .................................................................................. 18 Exercise 1.3: Understanding child abuse ............................................................................. 22 Module Two: Children keeping themselves and others safe ..............................................................................................38 Exercise 2.1: Talking about feelings ..................................................................................... 38 Exercise 2.2: Decision-making ............................................................................................. 44 Exercise 2.3: Children keeping children safe ....................................................................... 49 Module Three: Making organisations feel safe for children................................................................................................56
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship Between Child Protection Workers and School Social Workers
    St. Catherine University SOPHIA Master of Social Work Clinical Research Papers School of Social Work 3-2014 The Relationship Between Child Protection Workers and School Social Workers Daniel S. Gibbel St. Catherine University Follow this and additional works at: https://sophia.stkate.edu/msw_papers Part of the Social Work Commons Recommended Citation Gibbel, Daniel S.. (2014). The Relationship Between Child Protection Workers and School Social Workers. Retrieved from Sophia, the St. Catherine University repository website: https://sophia.stkate.edu/ msw_papers/317 This Clinical research paper is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Social Work at SOPHIA. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master of Social Work Clinical Research Papers by an authorized administrator of SOPHIA. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Running Head: Relationships Between Social Service Colleagues The Relationship Between Child Protection Workers and School Social Workers Daniel S. Gibbel MSW Clinical Research Paper Presented to the Faculty of School of the Social of Social Work St. Catherine University and the University of St. Thomas St. Paul, Minnesota In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Social Work Committee Members Karen Carlson, Ph.D. (Chair) Dana Hagemann, LSW Tricia Sedlacek MSW, LGSW The Clinical Research Project is a graduation requirement for MSW students at St. Catherine University/University of St. Thomas School of Social Work in St. Paul, Minnesota and is conducted within a nine-month time frame to demonstrate facility with basic social research methods. Students must independently conceptualize a research problem, formulate a research design that is approved by a research committee and the university Institutional Review Board, implement the project, and publicly present the findings of the study.
    [Show full text]
  • Child Custody Arrangements: Say What You Mean, Mean What You Say
    Land & Water Law Review Volume 31 Issue 2 Article 15 1996 Child Custody Arrangements: Say What You Mean, Mean What You Say DeNece Day Koenigs Kimberly A. Harris Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.uwyo.edu/land_water Recommended Citation Koenigs, DeNece Day and Harris, Kimberly A. (1996) "Child Custody Arrangements: Say What You Mean, Mean What You Say," Land & Water Law Review: Vol. 31 : Iss. 2 , pp. 591 - 621. Available at: https://scholarship.law.uwyo.edu/land_water/vol31/iss2/15 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by Law Archive of Wyoming Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Land & Water Law Review by an authorized editor of Law Archive of Wyoming Scholarship. Koenigs and Harris: Child Custody Arrangements: Say What You Mean, Mean What You Say Comment CHILD CUSTODY ARRANGEMENTS: Say What You Mean, Mean What You Say INTRODUCTION In Wyoming, custody battles place judges and court commissioners in King Solomon's' position nearly everyday as they are asked to split children between divorcing parents.2 Of course, judges and commissioners do not wield swords, but they do use legal terms which are often inade- quate and misused.' Unfortunately, the modem day result, though not as graphic as that from the Bible, is just as severe. As many as one in every two marriages will result in divorce.4 Thirty percent of children today will be the focus of a custody decision., For too many of these children, their lives will be adversely affected by an improper custody arrangement caused by the erroneous use of the term "joint custody." 6 The law as it stands in Wyoming does not adequately consider the non-legal aspects of custody or give practitioners and judges the guidance necessary to make appropriate custody determinations.' Gurney v.
    [Show full text]
  • Child Protection in Schools: a Four-Part Solution
    Child Protection in Schools: A Four-Part Solution According to recent U.S. statistics, over 770,000 children are victims of child abuse and neglect When a good portion of a student’s each year.1 Experiencing child abuse and neglect (maltreatment) is frequently associated with negative day is spent in school, it becomes the effects on children.2, 3 Many educational staff agree job of schools to make child protection that schools are at capacity in terms of taking on new initiatives, so determining how to protect children a top priority. and keep them safe may seem like an additional daunting task. safe and protected is a primary concern. When a When the bottom line appears set on achievement good portion of a student’s day is spent in school, it test scores, it can be hard for schools to justify any becomes the job of schools to make child protection change in focus. At the same time, keeping students a top priority. © 2014 Committee for Children ∙ SecondStep.org 1 priority and motivate staff to implement skills learned Four Components of School-Based Child Protection in training. Research by Yanowitz and colleagues6 underscores the importance of emphasizing policies Policies and Procedures and procedures in child abuse training within the Sta Training school setting. Student Lessons Family Education Administrators must assess their current child protection policies, Research indicates the most effective way to procedures and practices to develop do this is by training adults—all school staff and a comprehensive child protection caregivers—and teaching students skills.4, 5, 6 This can be accomplished by creating and implementing strategy for their school.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Social Work in International Child Protection
    Persona y Familia es una revista científica, multidisciplinaria, de periodicidadTHE ROLE OF SOCIAL WORK IN INTERNATIONAL CHILD anual del Instituto de la Familia de la Facultad de Derecho de la UniversidadPROTECTION: BEST PRACTICES IN STAKEHOLDER Femenina del Sagrado Corazón, dedicada a difundir las producciones de COOPERATION estudios en el campo de los Derechos de la persona y la familia. EL ROL DEL TRABAJO SOCIAL EN LA PROTECCIÓN INTERNACIONAL Hecho el Depósito Legal en la Biblioteca Nacional del Perú Nº 2013-05177DE LA NIÑEZ: MEJORES PRÁCTICAS EN COOPERACIÓN DE LAS PARTES INTERESADAS El contenido de cada artículo es de responsabilidad exclusiva de su autor o autores y no compromete la opinión de la revista. Julie Gilbert Rosicky,M.S.1 Felicity Sackville Northcott, Ph.D.2 Se necesita autorización del Instituto de la Familia de la Facultad de Derecho de la UNIFE para reproducir los artículos o partes de esta revista. Abstract Revista arbitrada The focus of this paper will be the intersection of law, policy implementation, PERSONA Y FAMILIA and social work in child protection, specifically child protection involving Revista del Instituto de la Família children who are separated by an international border from their families. Facultad de Derecho We will pay particular attention to international treaties, compacts, and Nº 0504 - 20162015 conventions on the one hand, and the need to increase the capacity of social ISSN versión impresa: 2310-3345 workers in the Americas to manage complex international child welfare cases in accordance with these laws and policies, on the other. The growing number of children migrants travelling between countries unaccompanied Dirección: are of special concern to social work agencies operating within the Northern UNIVERSIDAD FEMENINA DEL SAGRADO CORAZÓN-UNIFÉ Triangle and the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Zn the Nineteenth Century
    INTERNATIONAL LIBRARY OF SOCIOLOGY British AND SOCIAL RECONSTRUCTION Founded by Karl Mannhelm Social Work Editor W. J. H. Sprott zn the Nineteenth Century by A. F. Young and E. T. Ashton BC B 20623 73 9177 A catalogue of books available In the IN'rERNATIONAL LlDRARY OF ROUTLEDGE & KEGAN PAUL LTD SOCIOLOGY AND SOCIAL RECONSTRUCTION and new books m Broadway House, 68-74 Carter Lane preparation for the Library will be found at the end of this volume London, E.C.4 UIA-BIBLIOTHEEK 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11 """ ------------------------ Text continues after this page ------------------------ This publication is made available in the context of the history of social work project. See www.historyofsocialwork.org It is our aim to respect authors’ and publishers’ copyright. Should you feel we violated those, please do get in touch with us. Deze publicatie wordt beschikbaar gesteld in het kader van de canon sociaal werk. Zie www.canonsociaalwerk.eu Het is onze wens de rechten van auteurs en uitgevers te respecten. Mocht je denken dat we daarin iets fout doen, gelieve ons dan te contacteren. ------------------------ Tekst gaat verder na deze pagina ------------------------ r-= ! First published in 1956 I by Routledge and Kegan Paul Lld Broadway House, 68-74 Carter Lane London, E.C.4 Second impresszon 1963 I Third impression 1967 Printed in Great Britatn by CONTENTS Butler and Tanner Ltd Acknowledgments vu Frome and London I Introduction page I I . PART ONE I ' IDEAS WHICH INFLUENCED THE DEVELOPMENT OF SOCIAL WORK L I Influence of social and economic thought 7 I ConditWns-2 EcoROImc and Political Theories 2 Religious thought in the nineteenth century 28 I The Church if Engtar.d-2 The Tractarians-g Tilt Chris- tian Socialists-4 The JYonconformists-5 The Methodists- 6 The Unitarians-7 The Q.uakers-8 Conclusion 3 Influence of poor law prinClples and practice 43 I TIre problems and principles of poor law administration- 2 Criticisms by Social Workers and thezr results PART TWO MAIN BRANCHES OF SOCIAL WORK 4 Family case work-I.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Hindi Grammar
    Table of Contents Preface .......................................................................................... i Abbreviations ............................................................................ iii References .................................................................................. iv 1. Introduction 1.1. Area and Its Speakers ......................................................... 1 1.2. Dialects and Classification ................................................. 1 1.3. Hindi - Urdu ....................................................................... 2 1.4. Linguistic Characteristics ................................................... 4 1.5. Status .................................................................................. 4 1.6. Grammars in Hindi ............................................................ 7 2. Phonology 2.1. Phonological Units (Segmental) ...................................... 11 2.1.1. Distinctive Segments .................................................. 11 Vowels ................................................................................ 11 Consonants .......................................................................... 12 2.1.2. Description of Phonemes ............................................ 12 2.1.2.1. Vowels ................................................................... 12 2.1.2.2. Consonants ............................................................. 14 2.1.2.3. Distribution of Phonemes and Allophones ............ 19 2.2. Phonotactics ....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SKY Journal of Linguistics Is Published by the Linguistic Association of Finland (One Issue Per Year)
    SKY Journal of Linguistics is published by the Linguistic Association of Finland (one issue per year). Notes for Contributors Policy: SKY Journal of Linguistics welcomes unpublished original works from authors of all nationalities and theoretical persuasions. Every manuscript is reviewed by at least two anonymous referees. In addition to full-length articles, the journal also accepts short (3-5 pages) ‘squibs’ as well as book reviews. Language of Publication: Contributions should be written in either English, French, or German. If the article is not written in the native language of the author, the language should be checked by a qualified native speaker. Style Sheet: A detailed style sheet is available from the editors, as well as via WWW at http://www.ling.helsinki.fi/sky/skystyle.shtml. Abstracts: Abstracts of the published papers are included in Linguistics Abstracts and Cambridge Scientific Abstracts. SKY JoL is also indexed in the MLA Bibliography. Editors’ Addresses (2006): Pentti Haddington, Department of Finnish, Information Studies and Logopedics, P.O. Box 1000, FIN-90014 University of Oulu, Finland (e-mail pentti(dot)haddington(at-sign)oulu(dot)fi) Leena Kolehmainen, Savonlinna School of Translation Studies, University of Joensuu, P.O. Box 48, FIN-57101 Savonlinna, Finland (e-mail leena(dot)kolehmainen(at-sign)joensuu(dot)fi) Mari Lehtinen, Department of Romance Languages, P.O. Box 24, FIN-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland (e-mail mari(dot)lehtinen(at- sign)helsinki(dot)fi) Jouni Rostila, German Language and Culture Studies, FIN-33014 University of Tampere, Finland (e-mail jouni(dot)rostila(at-sign)uta(dot)fi) Publisher: The Linguistic Association of Finland c/o Department of General Linguistics P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • THE FORMAL PROPERTIES of NON PARADIGMATIC SE* Javier
    THE FORMAL PROPERTIES OF NON PARADIGMATIC SE* Javier Ormazabala,b & Juan Romerob,c University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)a, Basque Group for Theoretical Linguistics (HiTT)b, University of Extremadura (UEx)c ABSTRACT. Following Oca (1914), this article argues that passive and impersonal se constructions in Spanish are regular transitive constructions where the pronominal clitic se is the argumental subject. Several arguments (secondary predication, non-argumental predicates, control and obviation, anaphora binding, active morphology or its alignment with overt nominative pronouns, among others) show that (i) both constructions are active structures, (ii) despite what agreement facts might suggest, in both the internal argument of the verb is not the subject but the direct object throughout the derivation, (iii) se is the active nominative pronominal subject of the construction. We argue that the alleged ‘special’ properties of passive-se are not construction-specific but follow from the lexical specifications of se agreeing with Tense as a quirky subject. Keywords. se constructions; quirky subject; Differential Object Marking; subject clitics RESUMEN. Este artículo propone siguiendo a Oca (1914) que las construcciones con se pasivas e impersonales son construcciones transitivas normales cuyo sujeto es el clítico pronominal se. Distintos argumentos (predicación secundaria, predicados no argumentales, control y obviación, ligamiento de anáforas, morfología activa o su coherencia con el comportamiento de los pronombres nominativos explícitos entre otros) muestran que (i) se trata de dos construcciones activas, (ii) a pesar de lo que parecen sugerir los hechos de concordancia, en ambas construcciones el argumento interno del verbo no es el sujeto sino el complemento directo de la derivación y (iii) se es el sujeto pronominal nominativo de la construcción.
    [Show full text]