DOCSLIB.ORG

Notes of a Geobiology Watcher, Or How to Love Your Bacteria

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Notes of a Geobiology Watcher, Or How to Love Your Bacteria Notes of a Geobiology Watcher, or How to Love Your Bacteria Interactions Between Life Forms And The Earth’s Physical And Chemical Systems Prepared by Michael McGoodwin (MCM) Autumn 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction and Disclaimers ...................................................................................................................................................3 Instructors, Website, and Recommended Textbooks .............................................................................................................4 Geobiology Journal..........................................................................................................................................................4 LECTURE-RELATED MATERIALS ....................................................................................................................................4 Definition of Geobiology and Course Emphases.....................................................................................................................4 Topics of Study in Geobiology..................................................................................................................................................5 Typical Geobiological Research Questions.....................................................................................................................5 What is Life?..............................................................................................................................................................................6 Some of the relevant issues and questions:......................................................................................................................6 Characteristics of Life as we know it:..............................................................................................................................7 What are the essential characteristics of life? (How could extraterrestrial life differ and still be life?) ..........................8 Origin Of Life (How Did Life Start?) ......................................................................................................................................9 Extraterrestrial Life ................................................................................................................................................................17 Habitable Planets: Factors Predisposing to Habitability .....................................................................................................18 Presumed Characteristics of Habitable Planets (and Moons) ........................................................................................18 Water and Ice Line ........................................................................................................................................................21 Circumstellar Habitable Zone........................................................................................................................................22 Faint Young Sun Paradox..............................................................................................................................................24 Runaway Greenhouse Effect .........................................................................................................................................25 Galactic Habitable Zone (GHZ) ....................................................................................................................................25 Potential Sites of Life in the Solar System ....................................................................................................................26 Martian Life...................................................................................................................................................................28 Life Outside the Solar System .......................................................................................................................................31 Panspermia.....................................................................................................................................................................31 How Did Earth Become Habitable? (Early Earth History) .................................................................................................31 1. When did Earth form? ...............................................................................................................................................32 2. Moon Forming Impact (and Attainment of Final Earth Mass): .................................................................................33 3. Earth Differentiation: When Did the Core Segregate From The Mantle? .................................................................35 4. Crustal Differentiation...............................................................................................................................................36 5. Where Did The Atmosphere Come From? ................................................................................................................37 6. When Did The Oceans Condense? ............................................................................................................................38 7. Impact Frustration of Life..........................................................................................................................................38 Archean Environment.............................................................................................................................................................39 1. Was Surface Temperature Similar to Present? ..........................................................................................................39 2. Were Day Length and Size of Tides Different in the Archean? ................................................................................41 3. Tectonic Evolution: How Early Did Plate Tectonics Start?.......................................................................................43 First Signs of Life (When Did Life First Appear?)...............................................................................................................46 1. Difficulties in Detecting Earliest Life........................................................................................................................46 2. Microfossils ...............................................................................................................................................................47 3, Stromatolites..............................................................................................................................................................48 4. Isotope Fractionation As Evidence of Archean Life:.................................................................................................49 Domains of Life........................................................................................................................................................................51 1. Construction of the Tree of Life (TOL).....................................................................................................................51 2. Pattern of the Tree of Life: Three Domains...............................................................................................................53 3. Bacteria Domain, Specific Additional Details...........................................................................................................57 4. Archaea Domain ........................................................................................................................................................62 5. Eukaryote Domain.....................................................................................................................................................65 GeobiologyESS313.doc 4/13/2008 21:21 Page 1 of 225 Biochemical Cycles ..................................................................................................................................................................67 1. Characteristics of Biochemical Cycles ......................................................................................................................67 2. Carbon Cycles............................................................................................................................................................67 Short Term Organic Carbon Cycle ........................................................................................................................68 Long Term Organic Carbon Cycle: .......................................................................................................................70 Inorganic Carbon Cycle.........................................................................................................................................71 3. Sulfur Cycle...............................................................................................................................................................73 4. Nitrogen Cycle...........................................................................................................................................................75 Microbial Mineralization ........................................................................................................................................................76 1. Carbonate Precipitation in Stromatolites ...................................................................................................................76
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Snakes in the Plane
    Snakes in the Plane by Paul Church A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Mathematics in Computer Science Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2008 c 2008 Paul Church I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii Abstract Recent developments in tiling theory, primarily in the study of anisohedral shapes, have been the product of exhaustive computer searches through various classes of poly- gons. I present a brief background of tiling theory and past work, with particular empha- sis on isohedral numbers, aperiodicity, Heesch numbers, criteria to characterize isohedral tilings, and various details that have arisen in past computer searches. I then develop and implement a new “boundary-based” technique, characterizing shapes as a sequence of characters representing unit length steps taken from a finite lan- guage of directions, to replace the “area-based” approaches of past work, which treated the Euclidean plane as a regular lattice of cells manipulated like a bitmap. The new technique allows me to reproduce and verify past results on polyforms (edge-to-edge as- semblies of unit squares, regular hexagons, or equilateral triangles) and then generalize to a new class of shapes dubbed polysnakes, which past approaches could not describe. My implementation enumerates polyforms using Redelmeier’s recursive generation algo- rithm, and enumerates polysnakes using a novel approach.
    [Show full text]
  • Alfred Romer – Wikipedia
    Alfred Romer – Wikipedia https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Romer aus Wikipedia, der freien Enzyklopädie Alfred Sherwood Romer (* 28. Dezember 1894 in White Plains, New York; † 5. November 1973) war ein US-amerikanischer Paläontologe. Sein Fachgebiet war die Evolution der Wirbeltiere. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Leben 2 Romer-Lücke 3 Auszeichnungen und Ehrungen 4 Schriften 5 Weblinks 6 Einzelnachweise Leben Alfred Sherwood Romer wurde in White Plains, New York geboren, wo er seinen High-School-Abschluss machte. Danach arbeitete er ein Jahr lang als Angestellter bei der Eisenbahn und entschloss sich dann doch für den Besuch eines College. Mit Hilfe eines Stipendiums vom Amherst College konnte er dort Geschichte und deutsche Literatur studieren. Durch häufige Besuche des American Museum of Natural History entdeckte er seine Begeisterung für naturkundliche Fossilien. Bei Ausbruch des Ersten Weltkriegs meldete er sich als Freiwilliger zum Kriegsdienst und wurde sofort in Frankreich eingesetzt. 1919 kam er zurück nach New York und nahm das Studium der Biologie an der Columbia University auf, das er bereits zwei Jahre später mit der Promotion abschloss. Danach war er als wissenschaftliche Hilfskraft an der Bellevue Medical School der New York University beschäftigt und lehrte insbesondere Histologie, Embryologie und Allgemeine Anatomie. 1923 erhielt er einen Ruf von der Universität Chicago, wo er seine spätere Ehefrau Ruth kennenlernte, mit der er drei Kinder hatte. In Chicago fand er Bedingungen vor, die es ihm ermöglichten, sein Hauptinteresse zu intensivieren - die Paläontologie. So entstanden in den Jahren von 1925 bis 1935 37 Fachartikel, die sich mit diesem Thema befassten. 1934 wurde er zum Professor für Biologie an der Harvard University ernannt.
    [Show full text]
  • Ediacaran) of Earth – Nature’S Experiments
    The Early Animals (Ediacaran) of Earth – Nature’s Experiments Donald Baumgartner Medical Entomologist, Biologist, and Fossil Enthusiast Presentation before Chicago Rocks and Mineral Society May 10, 2014 Illinois Famous for Pennsylvanian Fossils 3 In the Beginning: The Big Bang . Earth formed 4.6 billion years ago Fossil Record Order 95% of higher taxa: Random plant divisions domains & kingdoms Cambrian Atdabanian Fauna Vendian Tommotian Fauna Ediacaran Fauna protists Proterozoic algae McConnell (Baptist)College Pre C - Fossil Order Archaean bacteria Source: Truett Kurt Wise The First Cells . 3.8 billion years ago, oxygen levels in atmosphere and seas were low • Early prokaryotic cells probably were anaerobic • Stromatolites . Divergence separated bacteria from ancestors of archaeans and eukaryotes Stromatolites Dominated the Earth Stromatolites of cyanobacteria ruled the Earth from 3.8 b.y. to 600 m. [2.5 b.y.]. Believed that Earth glaciations are correlated with great demise of stromatolites world-wide. 8 The Oxygen Atmosphere . Cyanobacteria evolved an oxygen-releasing, noncyclic pathway of photosynthesis • Changed Earth’s atmosphere . Increased oxygen favored aerobic respiration Early Multi-Cellular Life Was Born Eosphaera & Kakabekia at 2 b.y in Canada Gunflint Chert 11 Earliest Multi-Cellular Metazoan Life (1) Alga Eukaryote Grypania of MI at 1.85 b.y. MI fossil outcrop 12 Earliest Multi-Cellular Metazoan Life (2) Beads Horodyskia of MT and Aust. at 1.5 b.y. thought to be algae 13 Source: Fedonkin et al. 2007 Rise of Animals Tappania Fungus at 1.5 b.y Described now from China, Russia, Canada, India, & Australia 14 Earliest Multi-Cellular Metazoan Animals (3) Worm-like Parmia of N.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1 Some Astrophysical Reminders
    Appendix 1 Some Astrophysical Reminders Marc Ollivier 1.1 A Physics and Astrophysics Overview 1.1.1 Star or Planet? Roughly speaking, we can say that the physics of stars and planets is mainly governed by their mass and thus by two effects: 1. Gravitation that tends to compress the object, thus releasing gravitational energy 2. Nuclear processes that start as the core temperature of the object increases The mass is thus a good parameter for classifying the different astrophysical objects, the adapted mass unit being the solar mass (written Ma). As the mass decreases, three categories of objects can be distinguished: ∼ 1. if M>0.08 Ma ( 80MJ where MJ is the Jupiter mass) the mass is sufficient and, as a consequence, the gravitational contraction in the core of the object is strong enough to start hydrogen fusion reactions. The object is then called a “star” and its radius is proportional to its mass. 2. If 0.013 Ma <M<0.08 Ma (13 MJ <M<80 MJ), the core temperature is not high enough for hydrogen fusion reactions, but does allow deuterium fu- sion reactions. The object is called a “brown dwarf” and its radius is inversely proportional to the cube root of its mass. 3. If M<0.013 Ma (M<13 MJ) the temperature a the center of the object does not permit any nuclear fusion reactions. The object is called a “planet”. In this category one distinguishes giant gaseous and telluric planets. This latter is not massive enough to accrete gas. The mass limit between giant and telluric planets is about 10 terrestrial masses.
    [Show full text]
  • GTL PI Meeting 2003 Presentation Nealson
    USCUSC Geobiology Astrobiology Ken Nealson Wrigley Professor of Geobiology USC SHEWANELLA and Genomes to Life !! THE FUTURE!! WHERE ARE WE GOING? HOW WILL WE GET THERE? WHAT ARE THE CHALLENGES AND TRAPS? USCUSC Geobiology Astrobiology Genomes to Life: Shewanella and the future !! Genomes & Genomics: For sake of this discussion, I include Genome composition, gene expression, & metabolism Genomics Physiology Ecophsyiology Ecology Predictable Community Behavior Successful Manipulation of Natural Communities USCUSC Geobiology Astrobiology Shewanella in the future: Short Term: Genomic/Proteomic/Metabolic Connections Linkage of physiology to genomic information Mid Term: Ecophysiology Questions regarding regulation of MR-1 How does the cell”work”? Linkage of laboratory to microcosm and field data Long Term: Community structure and activities Genetic variability and use of genomic approaches Predictable community ecology The “old view” of Shewanella oneidensis Gamma Purple proteobacteria MR-1; when Isolated was One of ~10, Now >50 ! USCUSC Geobiology Astrobiology The “new view” of Shewanella Now MR-1 is again one of 1, although a strain of S. benthica is almost finished by a Japanese group (JAMSTEC) USCUSC Geobiology Astrobiology Excitement of the “new view”: May be able to use this information to dissect specific aspects of both ecology and evolution: Ecology: Involved in many different redox processes Aerobic and anaerobic niches Metal cycling connected with carbon cycling Potential for dealing with many toxic metals and radionuclides Can we understand Shewanella well enough to begin to use it? what it does how it does it how it regulates how it interacts with other organisms All of this well enough to make predictions that work.
    [Show full text]
  • Debris the Science and Changing Perceptions of Dead Trees by Alexander Evans and Robert Perschel
    An Appreciation of Debris The Science and Changing Perceptions of Dead Trees By Alexander Evans and Robert Perschel oarse woody debris. To most people, two Coarse woody debris (CWD) is wood in the forest that’s no of the three words in that phrase have longer part of a living tree. Rather than being dead, this wood negative connotations. Debris is the worst is an important source of life in the forest. Foresters who value offender, suggesting random junk strewn it for its ecological functions have been searching for new terms about. When the debris is coarse, it’s even for CWD, and you’ll hear it referred to as biomass, dead wood, worse – it’s unrefined, it’s big. coarse woody material, and even retained organic matter. VIRGINIA BARLOW 44 Northern Woodlands / Winter 2008 Harry Dwyer, a forester in Fayette, Maine, likens the lan- as a seed bed for trees and plants, a mulch layer, and a slow- guage predicament to that of another formerly maligned mate- release fertilizer. Decomposing fungi depend on dead wood for rial: garden waste. He said, “You could look at a pile of rotting nutrients and moisture, and in turn many trees rely on mutu- vegetables as garbage, or you could note its value and call it alistic relationships with mycorrhizal fungi. Nitrogen fixation compost.” Digging into a rotten log in his woodlot, Dwyer in CWM by microbes (both anaerobic and microaerophyllic displays some of the dark, wet material in his hand. “It doesn’t bacteria) provides this important element in both terrestrial matter what you call this – coarse woody debris, coarse woody and aquatic ecosystems.
    [Show full text]
  • International Geological Correlation Programme. Project 591 "The Early to Middle Paleozoic Revolution"
    International Geological Correlation Programme. Project 591 "The Early to Middle Paleozoic Revolution". Proceedings of the 3rd IGCP 591 Annual Meeting : Lund, Sweden, 9–19 June 2013 Lindskog, Anders; Mehlqvist, Kristina 2013 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Lindskog, A., & Mehlqvist, K. (Eds.) (2013). International Geological Correlation Programme. Project 591 "The Early to Middle Paleozoic Revolution". Proceedings of the 3rd IGCP 591 Annual Meeting : Lund, Sweden, 9–19 June 2013. (International Geological Correlation Programme, UNESCO; Vol. 3). Department of Geology, Lund University. Total number of authors: 2 General rights Unless other specific re-use rights are stated the following general rights apply: Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Read more about Creative commons licenses: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. LUND UNIVERSITY PO Box 117 221 00 Lund +46 46-222 00 00 ANDERS LINDSKOG | KRISTINA MEHLQVIST Printed by Media-Tryck, Lund 2013 Proceedings of the 3rd IGCP 591 Annual Meeting Proceedings of the 3 Lund, Sweden, 9–19 June 2013 EDITED BY ANDERS LINDSKOG | KRISTINA MEHLQVIST DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY | LUND UNIVERSITY The abstracts within this volume were presented at the 3rd IGCP 591 Annual rd Meeting, which was held in Lund, Sweden, in June 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • AN ABSTRACT of the THESIS of Douglas William Havlina for The
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Douglas William Havlina for the degree of Master of Science in Rangeland Resources presented on January 27, 1995 Title: Fire Effects on Vegetation Diversity, Structure, and Successional Dynamics in Shrub-Steppe and Mixed Conifer Environments of the Hells Canyon, Idaho. Abstract approved: The effects of fire severity on post-fire succession and shrub demography were quantified in shrub-steppe grasslands and subalpine forests in the Hells Canyon of the Payette National Forest, Idaho. Following the 1988 Eagle Bar Fire, species frequency, community diversity, fire adaptations, and stand ages were quantified at 12 plots in burned and unburned forests. Pre-fire composition was dominated by Pseudotsuga menziesii, Pinus contorta, Abies grandis, and Abies lasiocarpa in the overstory. Pre- fire basal area ranged from 41 to 80 m 2 ha-1 . Pre-fire stand ages ranged from 71 years in Abies lasiocarpa forests to > 200 years in Pseudotsuga menziesii stands. Fire scenarios which were sampled consisted of: (1) complete stand-replacement fires; (2) partial stand- replacement fires; and (3) unburned forests (control). Partial stand-replacement forests were characterized by significantly higher mean species diversity and richness (H'=3.16, S=36) than complete stand-replacement (H'=2.78, S=27) or unburned forests (H=2.26, S=15). Vegetation preferentially established in burned areas along a gradient of fire severity according to adapted fire guilds. Single-storied forests dominated by Pinus contorta and Abies lasiocarpa typified stand-replacement fire scenarios, with mean ages ranging from 99 to 159 years corresponding to fire return intervals common in this type.
    [Show full text]
  • Thoughts in Geobiology
    Journal of Geology and Mining Research Vol. 1(8), October, 2009 Available online http://www.academicjournals.org/jgmr ISSN 2006 – 9766 © 2009 Academic Journals Editorial Thoughts in Geobiology One of the possible ways to make connection between geologists and biologists is through studying subjects related to the newly established trend “Geobiology”. In the year 1972, Sylvester-Bradley stated that the Earth sciences include not only geology, but the hybrid-sciences geophysics, geochemistry and geobiology, of which the most complex and least rigorous is geobiology. Kump (2008) simply defined geobiology as the field that has recently energized the life and Earth sciences as geologists and biologists bring new tools to collaborations addressing fundamental problems that transcend the disciplines. The book edited by Xiao and Kaufman (2007) includes a set of multidisciplinary reviews on the Neoproterozoic fossil record (animals, algae, acritarchs, protists, and trace fossils), evolutionary developmental biology of animals, molecular clock estimates of phylogenetic divergences, and Neoproterozoic chemostratigraphy and sedimentary geology. The editors of this book believe that these topics are of continuing interest to geoscientists and bioscientists who are intrigued by the deep history of the Earth and its inhabitants. Yildirim et al. (2008) believe that microbial systems in extreme environments and in the deep biosphere may be analogous to potential life on other planetary bodies and hence may be used to investigate the possibilities of extraterrestrial life. I would add that astrobiologists are working on this point through studying materials from Mars. Through geobiology we search for origins and evolution of life, atmosphere, hydrosphere, lithosphere and biosphere, reasons of mass extinctions, interactions between microbes and minerals, global changes, and other subjects of interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Isotope Planetology
    Isotope Planetology Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität zu Köln vorgelegt von Maxwell Marzban Thiemens aus San Diego Köln, 2018 Berichterstatter Prof. Dr. Carsten Münker (Gutachter) Dr. Dominik Hezel Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 11.1.19 A process cannot be understood by stopping it. Understanding must move with the flow of the process, must join it and flow with it. Dune By F. Herbert 1965 Table of Contents Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................. 5 1.0 Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................. 7 2.0 Overview ................................................................................................................................... 9 2.1 Abstract ............................................................................................................................... 10 2.2 Zussamenfassung ................................................................................................................ 12 3.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 15 3.1 Early Solar System Evolution .............................................................................................. 16 3.2 Lunar Genesis .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Probable Case of Heterochrony in the Solutan
    A probable case of heterochrony in the solutan Dendrocystites Barrande, 1887 (Echinodermata: Blastozoa) from the Upper Ordovician of the Prague Basin (Czech Republic) and a revision of the family Dendrocystitidae Bassler, 1938 FLEUR NOAILLES, BERTRAND LEFEBVRE & LIBOR KAIÈKA The morphology of the Late Ordovician solutan Dendrocystites is reevaluated based on more than 300 specimens from the Letná and Zahořany formations (Prague Basin, Czech Republic). This genus is reported for the first time from the Bohdalec Formation, and its presence is confirmed in the Vinice Formation. The morphology of all specimens of the stratigraphically older species D. barrandei (Sandbian) is identical to that of small to medium-size individuals of D. sedgwicki (Katian). Distinctive characters of D. sedgwicki occur only in the largest specimens, and are all size-related (more asymmetrical thecal outlines, stronger ornamentation, rosetting pattern of thecal plates, proliferation of platelets in the proxistele). Consequently, the transition from D. barrandei to D. sedgwicki is interpreted as the result of heterochronic processes, with the largest individuals of D. sedgwicki displaying hyperadult morphologies (hyper- morphosis). Dendrocystites is locally abundant in both the Letná and Zahořany formations, but extremely rare in the deeper deposits of the Vinice and Bohdalec formations. This pattern coincides closely with first order fluctuations of the sea-level in the Prague Basin. The life orientation and implied feeding strategy of Dendrocystites and other solutans are both critically discussed. Several independent lines of evidence suggest that solutans were more likely detritus-feeders. Finally, it is proposed that two morphologically distinct patterns of dististele organization were elaborated independently from the polyplated, undifferentiated stalk-like appendage of Coleicarpus (plesiomorphic condition).
    [Show full text]
  • Morphology and Function in the Cambrian Burgess Shale
    Haug et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2012, 12:162 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/12/162 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Morphology and function in the Cambrian Burgess Shale megacheiran arthropod Leanchoilia superlata and the application of a descriptive matrix Joachim T Haug1*, Derek EG Briggs2,3 and Carolin Haug1 Abstract Background: Leanchoilia superlata is one of the best known arthropods from the middle Cambrian Burgess Shale of British Columbia. Here we re-describe the morphology of L. superlata and discuss its possible autecology. The re-description follows a standardized scheme, the descriptive matrix approach, designed to provide a template for descriptions of other megacheiran species. Results: Our findings differ in several respects from previous interpretations. Examples include a more slender body; a possible hypostome; a small specialised second appendage, bringing the number of pairs of head appendages to four; a further sub-division of the great appendage, making it more similar to that of other megacheirans; and a complex joint of the exopod reflecting the arthropod’s swimming capabilities. Conclusions: Different aspects of the morphology, for example, the morphology of the great appendage and the presence of a basipod with strong median armature on the biramous appendages indicate that L. superlata was an active and agile necto-benthic predator (not a scavenger or deposit feeder as previously interpreted). Keywords: Megacheira, Great-appendage arthropods, Chelicerata sensu lato, Descriptive matrix, Active predator Background shared with other species. As a consequence, morpho- The description of species is fundamental to the science logical details in many phylogenetic matrices have to be of zoology, including taxonomy, phylogenetic systema- (re-)interpreted, often without the benefit of a compre- tics, functional morphology and ultimately evolutionary hensive description.
    [Show full text]