Pdf 11733.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pdf 11733.Pdf US Army Engineer School By Order of the Secretary of the Army : 573-563-8080 I D$N 676-8080 PETER J. SCHOOMAKER COMMANDANT General, United States Army MG R.L. Van Antwerp Chief of Staff 563-6116 «ronen.vana ntwerp [email protected]/I> INCOMING COMMANDANT Official: MG Randal R. Castro 563-6116 #~~ I <[email protected] m l> ASSISTANTCOMMANDANT JOEL B. HUDSON BG William H. McCoy, Jr. 563-6192 Administrative Assistant to the <lVllllam.h.mccoy @us.army.mil> Secretary of the Army REGIMENTAL COMMAND SERGEANT MAJOR 0123204 CSM Clinlon J. Pearson 563-8060 Engineer (ISSN 0046-1989) is prepared quarterly <clinton.pearson @us.army.mll> by the US Army Engineer School, 320 MANSC EN DEPUTYASSISTANTCOMMANDANT Loop, Suite 210, Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri 65473­ COL John (Pat) Leak e 563-8080 8929. Periodica ls postage is paid at Fort Leonard <pat.leake @us.arrny.mll> Wood, Missouri, and additional mailing offices. DEPUTYASSISTANTCOMMANDANT-USAR POSTMASTER : Send address changes to US COL Gerald Lago Army EngineerSchool.Al'Ttc: ATSE-DOTLD-PMO (En­ 563-8045 <gerald lago@us army.mil> gineer), 320 MANSCEN Loop, Suite 370, Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri 65473-8929. DEPUTYASSISTANTCOMMANDANT-ARNG LTC Denn is V. Smith CORRESPONDENCE, letters to the editor, manu­ 563-8046 <dennis.v.smlth@ us.army mll> scripts, photographs , official unit requests to receive copies, and unit address changes should be sent to CHIEF of STAFF LTC Paul Grosskruger Engineer at the preceding address. Telephone: (573) 563-7116 563-4104, DSN 676-4104 . Engineer's e-mail address <[email protected]> is <engineer @wood.army.mil>. Our Internet home COMMANDER, 151 ENGINEER BRIGADE page is located at <http://w ww.wood.a rmy.mil/ COL Paul W, Kelly engrmag/emag_hp.htm> . 596-0224, DSN 581·0224 <paul.w.keJly @us army.mrl> DISCLAIMER : Engineer presents professional in­ TRADOC SYSTEMS MANAG ER tor ASSURED MOBILITY format ion designed to keep U.S. military and civil­ COL Robert Nicholson ian engineers informed of current and emerging de­ 563-4081 <robel1.ntChOlson @us.army mt/> velopments within their areas of expertise for the pur­ COUNTER EXPLOSIVE HAZARDS CENTER pose of enhancing their professional development. LTC Thomas T. Quigley Views expressed are those of the authors and not 596-0131 , ext. 38 142 those of the Department of Defense or its elements. <thomas t.qwgley @u$.army.mil> The contents do not necessarily reflect official US Army TRADOC PROGRAM INTEGRATION OFFICE-TERRAIN DATA COL David A. Kingston positions and do not change or supersed e informa­ 563-4086 tion in other US Army publications, Use of news items <david kmgston @us.army.mil> constitutes neither affirmation of their accuracy nor DIRECTOR of FUTURES and CAPABILITIES DEVELOPMENT product endorsement. Engineer reserves the right to COL Everett McDaniel edil material submitted for publication. 563-4076 <everetf.mcdanie/@us army.m il> CONTENT is not copyrighted. Material may be re­ CHIEF OF DOCTRINE printed if credit is given to Engineer and the author. LTC Edward Letler OFFICIAL DISTRIBUTION is targeted to all engi­ 563-7537 <[email protected]!> neer and engineer-related units. PERSONAL SUBSCRIPTIONS are available for DIRECTOR of TRAINING and LEADER DEVELOPMENT COL Thomas E. O'Donovan $19.00 ($26.60 foreign) per year by contact ing the 563-4093 Superintendent of Documents, P.O. Box 3719 54 , <thomas.odonovan @us.armymll> Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania 15250-7954. DIRECTOR of ENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRATION ADDRESS CHANGES for personal subscriptions Dr. Rebecca N. Johnson 563-4119 should be sent to the Superintendent of Docu­ <rebeccaj ohnson @us.army.mil> ments , ATTN: Mail List Branch, Mail Stop SSOM , Washington D.C. 20402. NGINEE The Professional Bulletin of Army Engineers July-September 2004 EHeadquarters, Department of the Army VolumeR 34 PB 5-04-3 UNITED STATES ARMY FEATURES ENGINEER SCHOOL 04 Assured Mobility in the Army’s First Stryker Brigade COMMANDANT By Major Heath C. Roscoe and Captain Kenneth Dean Mitchell Major General 08 Noncommissioned Officer Education System Structure Redesign R.L. Van Antwerp By Command Sergeant Major Clinton J. Pearson 09 Engineer Battalion Headquarters Company Operations MANAGING EDITOR By Captain Jerry McDaniel Shirley Bridges 13 Task Force Able Supporting Operation Iraqi Freedom CONTRIBUTING EDITORS By Colonel Christopher J. Toomey Nancy Baker Karin Gan 18 Engineer Mine Detection Dogs Cheryl Green By Mr. James Pettit and Captain Ronald J. Hughes Penny Moats 21 Operation Tunnel: Confined-Space Operations Within the Tunnels Kathy Webber of Chicago GRAPHIC DESIGNER By Captain David Noble and Captain James Allen Jennifer Morgan 26 Security Operations in Support of the Divisional Rear Area By Captain Bryan K. Sizemore and Master Sergeant James Duncan Front Cover: 29 The Engineer Command and Staff Course: A New Era US Army engineer of Leader Development soldier photos by Department of Defense By Major Craig Jolly Imagery Service – 30 Army’s Top Deployers Receive Excellence Awards Combat Camera By Mr. Henry H. Johnson Back Cover: 32 The Engineer Small-Group Leader The Soldier’s Creed By Major Chris A. Parks 34 The Survey Experience During Operation Iraqi Freedom By First Lieutenant Vilen Ayvazov and Captain Aaron Wolf DEPARTMENTS 37 Engineer Safety - “Hazards of Crystalline Silica” 02 Clear the Way By Mr. Fred Fanning By Major General R.L. Van Antwerp 38 Past In Review - “Terror on Flight 847” 03 Lead the Way By Major Ron Eschmann By Command Sergeant Major Clinton J. Pearson 36 Enlisted Personnel Notes - “Reclassification of Soldiers in Selected MOSs” By Major Ruben Matos July-September 2004 Engineer 1 Clear The Way By Major General R.L. Van Antwerp Commandant, US Army Engineer School reetings once again from Fort It’s exciting to see the direction the Army is Leonard Wood. Our stay here was going. We are well on our way to increasing the Gextended a few months, and Paula and number of Brigade Combat Teams to 43 in the I are thankful for the extra time with the Sol- Active Component. We are on our way toward diers here at the home of the Engineer Regi- growing the active force by 30,000 Soldiers, a ment. We will give it our best for as long as the job that will require all of us to be recruiters Army wants us to be here. We talk often about and retainers—a very important job. The Army Soldiers needing to be agile and adaptive, and now is moving in the right direction to make today’s we get a chance to model it. Major General Randy force more ready for tomorrow’s challenges. Castro and his wife Judy are ready to go as soon as We are growing the Army and paying for it out our change-of-command date is approved. Randy of go-to-war dollars. If we have to increase the is assigned as Acting Commander of Accessions end strength even more we will, but that means Command until the changeover. we have to recruit it and train it. Congratulations to all you sappers now au- Dr. Lenny Wong has written an article on thorized to wear the tab and to our Regimental “agile and adaptive” leaders and what the war Command Sergeant Major for this great achieve- has done to build these characteristics into our ment in recognition. I’ll let him tell you the details, junior leaders. You can find a link to it on the but I couldn’t be prouder. Engineer School Web site at <http://www.wood.army.mil/eschool>. Our challenge here at Fort Leonard Wood is to make sure our young leaders For you new commanders who haven’t had a chance to hear and Soldiers don’t lose sight of what’s key to success. We are looking at me talk about priorities, here goes: support for the war; initial- ways to empower them and allow them to retain ownership for their entry training—the top priority in training (meet the standards, education and actions. and fully resource it); training and leader development—all initial military training; recruiting and retaining the force; transforma- We are also working to build the “go-to-war and sustain-our- tion; and joint relationships. selves-during-war” mentality. In our initial-entry training environ- ment, we need to get rid of administrative time-outs when we are If you have any questions about these or other areas within the going to the field and practice what our Soldiers are experiencing Regiment, send your requests and questions here, and we will work when deployed. We will work improvised explosive devices (IEDs) the issues. You will see some new names on the Fort Leonard Wood into the field scenarios as much as possible. Convoys need to train team in this issue, and they come ready to contribute to the fight. like combat patrols because that is what they have become. Every My philosophy is that we need to continually work the mission and movement on the battlefield is a combat operation. I ask you to resources to find the balance and to get the “walnuts” done first and remember this in your training exercises at home station and our well. Where we have resource issues, we will make decisions in light combat training centers as well. As we incorporate the 40 warrior of the priorities. I would rather “do less with less, but do it much tasks and 9 battle drills into our standardized training here, we keep better” than “do more with less.” Sticking to excellence in basic one statistic in mind: approximately half of the casualties in Opera- fundamentals proves its worth in our training base as well as it does tion Iraqi Freedom are 21 years old or younger.
Recommended publications
  • Cost-Effective Levee Design for Cases Along the Meuse River Including Uncertain- Ties in Hydraulic Loads
    Cost-effective levee design for cases along the Meuse river including uncertain- ties in hydraulic loads B. Broers Delft University of Technology . Cost-effective levee design for cases along the Meuse river including uncertainties in hydraulic loads by Ing. B. Broers in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Civil Engineering at the Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences to be defended publicly on January 15, 2015 Student number: 4184408 Supervisor: Prof. dr. ir. M. Kok, TU Delft - Hydraulic Engineering section Thesis committee: Dr. ir. T. Schweckendiek, TU Delft - Hydraulic Engineering section Ir. drs. J. G. Verlaan, TU Delft - Construction Management and Engineering section Ir. S.A. van Lammeren, Royal HaskoningDHV Ir. drs. E. R. Kuipers, Waterschap Peel en Maasvallei An electronic version of this thesis is available at http://repository.tudelft.nl/. Preface This MSc Thesis reflects the final part of the Master of Science degree in Hydraulic Engineering at the Civil Engineering and Geosciences Faculty of the Delft University of Technology. The research is per- formed under guidance of the Delft University of Technology in cooperation with Royal HaskoningDHV and Waterschap Peel & Maasvallei. I like to thank many people for their support and cooperation during my graduation thesis. In the first place I thank my direct supervisors: Timo Schweckendiek, Enno Kuipers and Bas van Lammeren for their helpful feedback, enthusiasm and guidance during the thesis. Many thanks to Prof. Matthijs Kok for his support and advice. My thanks to Jules Verlaan too, who helped me especially in the field of LCCA.
    [Show full text]
  • Engineering Evaluation of Hesco Barriers Performance at Fargo, ND 2009," May 2009 Engineering Evaluation of Hesco Barriers Performance at Fargo,ND 2009
    ENCLOSURE 2 Wenck Associates, Inc., "Engineering Evaluation of Hesco Barriers Performance at Fargo, ND 2009," May 2009 Engineering Evaluation of Hesco Barriers Performance at Fargo,ND 2009 Wenck File #2283-01 Prepared for: Hesco Bastion, LLC 47152 Conrad E. Anderson Drive Hammond, LA 70401 Prepared by: WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. 3310 Fiechtner Drive; Suite 110 May 2009 Fargo, North Dakota (701) 297-9600 SWenck Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Purpose of Evaluation......................................................................................... 1-3 1.2 Background Information ...................................................................................... 1-3 2.0 CITY OF FARGO USES OF HESCO BARRIERS ......................... 2-1 2.1 Number of Miles Used Versus Total ................................................................... 2-1 2 .2 S izes ........................................................................................................ ............. 2 -1 2.3 Installation Rates .................................................................................................. 2-1 2.4 Complicating Factors .......................................................................................... 2-1 3.0 INTERVIEWS WITH CITY AND CITY REPRESENTATIVES ............................. 3-1 3.1 Issues Raised and Areas of Concern .................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Comments
    [Show full text]
  • Triple Nickel Tribune
    Triple Nickel Tribune “Willing and Able!” NEWSLETTER OF THE 555 TH ENGINEER BRIGADE JOINT BASE LEWIS - M C CHORD, WASHINGTON Spring 2014 www.Facebook.com/555enbde Message from the Commander Colonel Timothy Holman, “Able 6” Triple Nickel Team, At A Glance… 555TH HAS COMPLETED RESET Welcome to the spring edi- PERIOD FROM 2013 DEPLOYMENT tion of our newsletter. We’re excited to show FULLY IMMERSED IN TRAINING TO you the won- PREPARE FOR FUTURE MISSIONS derful work UNITS PREPARE FOR REDUCTIONS being done by Photo by U.S. Army Spc. Jasmine Higgins, 28th Public Affairs Detachment The 570th Engineer Company’s command team cases their unit AND OTHER CHANGES AS BRIGADE our Willing and TRANSFORMS AND DOWNSIZES Able Soldiers, guidon prior to departing for Afghanistan earlier this spring. Families and TOWN HALLS HELD IN APRIL TO leaders across Amid transformation, 555th remains EDUCATE SOLDIERS/FAMILIES ABOUT the Triple Nickel Brigade. THE IMPACT OF RESTRUCTURING; combat ready, deployment focused VIDEO LINK TO THE TOWN HALL STILL Being a part of this team for AVAILABLE ON FACEBOOK… OR BY six months, I have been im- Story by Capt. Spencer Garrison Triple Nickel construction units CLICKING HERE IF VIEWING ONLINE pressed with the discipline and 555th Eng. Bde. Public Affairs inactivating as the brigade trans- 555TH CONSISTS OF 4 BATTALIONS hard work of our units. BJ and I forms in line with Army downsizing. AND OTHER DETACHMENTS AT JBLM have enjoyed meeting our Sol- JBLM — The 555th Engineer August will see the conversion diers as well as their Families. Brigade approaches the summer of the 14th Eng.
    [Show full text]
  • Construction Guide V2 LR.Pdf
    1 Introduction – protect and survive 2 Basic construction guidelines 3 Design of Concertainer structures 4 Fill selection and characteristics 5 Preconfigured structures 6 Improvised structures 7 Maintenance and repair 8 Product technical information 9 Trial information 10 Packing and shipping 11 Conversion tables 12 Contacts 1 Introduction – protect and survive Introduction – protect and survive 1.01 HESCO® Concertainer® has Delivered flat-packed on standard been a key component in timber skids or pallets, units providing Force Protection since can be joined and extended the 1991 Gulf War. using the provided joining pins and filled using minimal Concertainer units are used manpower and commonly extensively in the protection of available equipment. personnel, vehicles, equipment and facilities in military, Concertainer units can be peacekeeping, humanitarian installed in various configurations and civilian operations. to provide effective and economical structures, tailored They are used by all major to the specific threat and level military organisations around of protection required. Protective the world, including the UK structures will normally be MOD and the US Military. designed to protect against ballistic penetration of direct fire It is a prefabricated, multi- projectiles, shaped charge cellular system, made of warheads and fragmentation. Alu-Zinc coated steel welded HESCO Guide Construction for Engineers mesh and lined with non-woven polypropylene geotextile. Introduction – protect and survive 1.02 Protection is afforded by the fill In constructing protective material of the structure as a structures, consideration must consequence of its mass and be given to normal structural physical properties, allied with design parameters. the proven dynamic properties of Concertainer units. The information included in this guide is given in good faith, Users must be aware that the however local conditions may protection afforded may vary affect the performance of HESCO Guide Construction for Engineers with different fill materials, and structures.
    [Show full text]
  • All Action MS502 Over USD100000
    This report provides information about FAO’s vendors and their goods and services for 2013 where the value of the Purchase Order exceeds US$100,000. This data is presented to the best of FAO's knowledge as correct. If there are omissions, errors or comments please do contact FAO Vendors with procurement actions over USD100,000 for 2013 [email protected] Name of Vendor Vendor Country General Description of Goods or Services Sum of USD Total Net Value A.G. THOMAS (PTY) LTD Swaziland Construction of Ndlolowane dam and Irrigation scheme 329,722.81 A.G. THOMAS (PTY) LTD Total 329,722.81 A.K. Bhuiyan & Co. Bangladesh Measurement instruments 172,529.31 A.K. Bhuiyan & Co. Total 172,529.31 A.T.I. SANITAL-PIEMONTE-LATECNICA Italy Facility Support Services HQ 4,490,956.25 A.T.I. SANITAL-PIEMONTE-LATECNICA Total 4,490,956.25 AASTRA ITALIA SPA Italy Technical Support Services HQ 107,679.97 AASTRA ITALIA SPA Total 107,679.97 ABDEL AAL RAGHEB COMPANY Palestinian Territory,Occupied Procurement of sheep 239,095.24 ABDEL AAL RAGHEB COMPANY Total 239,095.24 ABID HUSSAIN SHAH CORPORATION Pakistan Breeding Goats 7,865.05 Feeding Kit, Milking Kit & Milk Collection Unit 39,408.72 Milk Collection units 3,212.94 Seeds Silos 27,124.00 Seed Silos & Tool Kits 42,607.67 ABID HUSSAIN SHAH CORPORATION Total 120,218.38 ACADEV COMPANY LIMITED Ghana Constuction and rehabilitation works RAF 75,813.31 Constuction and rehabilitation works RAF 96,702.27 ACADEV COMPANY LIMITED Total 172,515.58 ACEA ENERGIA SPA Italy Electricity - Utilities 2,559,681.70 Electricity - Utilities
    [Show full text]
  • A Strategic Planning Framework for Arverne East
    Planning for a Resilient Rockaways: A Strategic Planning Framework for Arverne East Waterfront Solutions (NYU): Alda Chan, Sa Liu, Jon McGrath, Rossana Tudo, Kathleen Walczak Acknowledgements This project was made possible thanks to the support of many individuals and organizations. Waterfront Solutions would like to thank everyone at Rockaway Waterfront Alliance and NYU Wagner who contributed to this endeavor. We are grateful to a number of experts and individuals who provided participated in meetings and shared information to support this report. Thanks to Arjan Braamskamp and Robert Proos (Consulate General of the Netherlands in New York), David Bragdon (NYC Department of Parks and Recreation), John Boule, (Parsons Brinkerhoff), John Young and Barry Dinerstein (NYC Department of City Planning), Jonathan Gaska (Queens Community District 14); Gerry Romski (Arverne by the Sea), Michael Polo (NYC Department of Housing Preservation and Development), Ron Schiffman (Pratt Institute); Ron Moelis and Rick Gropper (L+M Development), and Steven Bluestone (The Bluestone Organization). We would like to express our gratitude towards Robert Balder (Cornell Architecture, Art and Planning) and Walter Meyer (Local Office Landscape) for their guidance and insight during the research process. Our sincere thanks to faculty advisors Michael Keane and Claire Weisz for their feedback and support throughout this process. Front and back cover photo credit: Joe Mabel Table of Contents Executive Summary.........................................................02
    [Show full text]
  • Restoring Gulf Oyster Reefs: Opportunities for Innovation
    RESTORING GULF OYSTER REEFS June 2012 Opportunities for Innovation Shawn Stokes Susan Wunderink Marcy Lowe Gary Gereffi Restoring Gulf Oyster Reefs This research was prepared on behalf of Environmental Defense Fund: http://www.edf.org/home.cfm Acknowledgments – The authors are grateful for valuable information and feedback from Patrick Banks, Todd Barber, Dennis Barkmeyer, Larry Beggs, Karim Belhadjali, Anne Birch, Seth Blitch, Rob Brumbaugh, Mark Bryer, Russ Burke, Rob Cook, Jeff DeQuattro, Blake Dwoskin, John Eckhoff, John Foret, Sherwood Gagliano, Kyle Graham, Timm Kroeger, Ben LeBlanc, Romuald Lipcius, John Lopez, Gus Lorber, Tom Mohrman, Tyler Ortego, Charles Peterson, George Ragazzo, Edwin Reardon, Dave Schulte, Todd Swannack, Mike Turley, and Lexia Weaver. Many thanks also to Jackie Roberts for comments on early drafts. None of the opinions or comments expressed in this study are endorsed by the companies mentioned or individuals interviewed. Errors of fact or interpretation remain exclusively with the authors. We welcome comments and suggestions. The lead author can be contacted at: [email protected] List of Abbreviations BLS Bureau of Labor and Statistics COSEE Centers for Oceans Sciences Education Excellence CWPPRA Coastal Wetlands Planning Protection and Restoration Act DEP Department of Environmental Protection DMR Mississippi Department of Marine Resources DNR Louisiana Department of Natural Resources EPA Environmental Protection Agency FWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NPCA National Precast Concrete Association NRDC Natural Resources Defense Council NSF National Science Foundation OBAR Oyster Break Artificial Reef OCPR Office of Coastal Protection and Restoration SBA Small Business Association TNC The Nature Conservancy TPWD Texas Parks and Wildlife Department USACE United States Army Corps of Engineers Cover Photo: © Erika Nortemann/The Nature Conservancy.
    [Show full text]
  • Invitation to Bid
    INVITATION TO BID Civil Works at United Nations Common Compound (UNCC) in Garowe, Somalia ITB No.: 143259/21 Project: UNCC Country: Somalia Issued on: August 4, 2021 P a g e | 1 CONTENTS Section 1. Letter of Invitation ..................................................................................................................... 5 Section 2. Instruction to Bidders ................................................................................................................ 6 GENERAL PROVISIONS ........................................................................................................................................................ 6 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................. 6 2. Fraud & Corruption, Gifts and Hospitality .................................................................................................................. 6 3. Eligibility ........................................................................................................................................................................ 6 4. Conflict of Interests ...................................................................................................................................................... 7 B. PREPARATION OF BIDS ............................................................................................................................................. 7 5. General Considerations
    [Show full text]
  • Infrastructure Defense Technologies
    In the United States Court of Federal Claims (Filed April 7, 2008) (Originally Filed Under Seal March 14, 2008) INFRASTRUCTURE DEFENSE ) TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ) No. 07-582 C Plaintiff, ) (Consolidated Lead Case) ) v. ) Pre-award bid protest; subject matter ) jurisdiction; standing; prejudice; waiver; bridge THE UNITED STATES, ) contract; sole source supply contract; cross- Defendant, ) motions for judgment on the administrative ) record; motion to dismiss; one responsible and ) source exception to the Competition in ) Contracting Act; standard of review; national HESCO BASTION, LTD, ) defense and security. Defendant-Intervenor. ) ) INFRASTRUCTURE DEFENSE ) TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ) Plaintiff, ) ) No. 07-695 C v. ) (Consolidated Member Case) ) THE UNITED STATES, ) Defendant. ) C. Joël Van Over, McLean, VA, for plaintiff. Jack Y. Chu, of counsel. David A. Harrington and A. Bondurant Eley, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for defendant, with whom were Jeffrey S. Bucholtz, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, and Brian M. Simkin, Assistant Director. Douglas C. Proxmire, Washington, D.C., for defendant-intervenor. Elizabeth Gill, of counsel. OPINION AND ORDER1/ Merow, Senior Judge In this pre-award procurement protest, brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1491(b)(1), the protestor, Infrastructure Defense Technologies, LLC (hereinafter “IDT”), seeks injunctive and declaratory relief to preclude the Defense Logistics Agency (“DLA”) from awarding a follow-on sole source Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (“IDIQ”) contract for collapsible force protection (“Concertainer”) units to Hesco Bastion, Ltd. (“Hesco”). Hesco has intervened in this action. Pursuant to RCFC 52.1, motions have been filed, by all parties, for judgment on the administrative record of this procurement which record was supplemented by the deposition of DLA official Thomas Lauersen and material submitted by plaintiff.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide De Construction Pour Les Opérateurs Version 2
    Guide de construction pour les opérateurs Version 2 1 Introduction - protéger et survivre 2 Instructions générales de construction 3 Conception de structures Concertainer 4 Matériau de remplissage 5 Structures préconfigurées 6 Structures improvisées 7 Maintenance et réparation 8 Informations techniques sur le produit 9 Informations sur les essais 10 Conditionnement et acheminement 11 Tableaux de conversion 12 Contacts 1 Introduction - protéger et survivre Introduction - protéger et survivre 1.01 HESCO® Concertainer® a joué Livrées à plat sur des palettes un rôle clé dans la protection de bois standards, les unités des forces depuis la Guerre du peuvent être assemblées et Golfe de 1991. Les produits étendues grâce aux goupilles Concertainer sont beaucoup fournies et remplies par un employés dans la protection des minimum de personnel au individus, des véhicules, des moyen d'équipements équipements et des installations communément disponibles. dans les opérations militaires, humanitaires, civiles et de Les unités Concertainer peuvent maintien de la paix. être installées dans différents types de configurations afin de Ils sont également utilisés par proposer des structures toutes les plus grandes économiques et efficaces, organisations militaires dans le adaptées à la menace monde, notamment le ministère spécifique et au niveau de de la Défense britannique et protection requis. Les structures l'armée américaine. protectrices seront normalement conçues pour assurer la Il s'agit d'un système multi- protection contre la pénétration cellulaire préfabriqué, constitué balistique des projectiles directs, d'un maillage d'acier enduit des ogives à charge creuse et d'alu-zinc et garni d'un géotextile des projectiles à fragmentation. en polypropylène non tissé.
    [Show full text]
  • Class of 2022
    Department Catalog and Guide to Academic Programs Class of 2022 Department of Geography and Environmental Engineering - 0 – DEPARTMENT CATALOG GUIDE TO THE ACADEMIC PROGRAMS CLASS OF 2022 TABLE OF CONTENTS Message to Cadets ............................................................................................................... 2 After Graduation ................................................................................................................. 5 Department Opportunities .............................................................................................. 7 Center for Academic Excellence ................................................................................... 10 Programs for Class of 2022 ............................................................................................. 11 Academic Major Descriptions ........................................................................................ 12 Academic Major Details.................................................................................................... 14 Faculty Counselors ........................................................................................................... 30 Course Offerings and Descriptions ................................................................................ 32 Complementary Support Courses ................................................................................... 45 Department Faculty ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Doe/Ea-1606 Environmental Assessment for The
    DOE/EA-1606 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED USE OF SAVANNAH RIVER SITE LANDS FOR MILITARY TRAINING December 2011 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY SAVANNAH RIVER OPERATIONS OFFICE SAVANNAH RIVER SITE DOE/EA-1606 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED USE OF SAVANNAH RIVER SITE LANDS FOR MILITARY TRAINING December 2011 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY SAVANNAH RIVER OPERATIONS OFFICE SAVANNAH RIVER SITE This page is intentionally left blank ii TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................1 1.1 Background ..................................................................................................1 1.2 Purpose and Need for Action .......................................................................3 1.3 Public Involvement ......................................................................................3 2.0 PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES ....................................................4 2.1 Proposed Action: Use of a Proposed Area of SRS for Non-Live-Fire Tactical Maneuver Training .........................................................................4 2.1.1 Non-Live-Fire Tactical Maneuver Training Activities ..................10 2.1.1.1 Reconnaissance and Surveillance Operations ..............10 2.1.1.2 Temporary Forward Arming and Refueling Point .......10 2.1.1.3 Refuel on the Move Operations ...................................11 2.1.1.4 Mobile Resupply Operation .........................................13 2.1.1.5 Chemical,
    [Show full text]