Transportation Tunnels in Greater Boston

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Transportation Tunnels in Greater Boston Survey Transportation Tunnels in Greater Boston capacity of public transportation in the Boston A summary of all major trans­ area. In 1888, there were more than eight thou­ sand horses pulling streetcars in Boston. The portation tunnels in the Boston many rapid transit facilities built since that area, with notes on how their time (Woodhouse & Barosh, 1991; Clarke & Cummings, 1997; Cheney, 2002; Cudahy, 2004; construction added to under­ McKendry, 2005) formed the foundations of standing Boston's geology. today's Red, Orange, Blue, Green and Silver subway lines of the MBTA (see Figure 6-1). This subway network, now 125 kilometers DAVID WOODHOUSE & PATRICK J. BAROSH (77.4 miles) in length, carries an estimated 250 n order to accommodate Boston's growth, million riders annually, and has planned and to facilitate commerce, a number of extensions. The system includes 50 kilometers Ipublic works have been designed and con­ (31 miles) of active subway tunnels. For a met­ structed since the late nineteenth century. ropolitan area the size of Boston, its rapid Tunnels have been built for vehii:ular traffic as transit system is large when compared to well as for mass transit. The tunnels have rapid transit facilities elsewhere in the United largely been excavated by means of open-cut States. Boston has 1ong been a leader in rapid excavations, with notable exceptions for the transit development, starting with America's trans-harbor crossings and the Massachusetts first subway part of the Green Line, which Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) Red . opened in 1897, and the second undersea tun­ Line extension through Porter Square, nel, the East Boston Tunnel on the Blue Line, Cambridge. Tunnel excavations offer a unique put in service in 1904. Both lines remain in opportunity tq examine soil and rock over a daily use and are augmented by the area's long cross-section not always afforded by commuter rail system. The subway tunnels building excavations. were largely constructed by cut-and-cover methods with three notable exceptions. Subway Tunnels Early Subway Construction History. A three­ More than a century has passed since state person Board of Subway Commissioners, and local governments in Massachusetts first subject to approval of the Boston City Council recognized the need for decreasing street con­ and appointed by the mayor, was created in gestion and for increasing the speed and 1893 by the state legislature to report on the CIVIL ENGINEERING PRACTICE 2011/2012 295 FIGURE 6-1. Map of the Boston area showing routes of the MBTA system, July 2011. feasibility of building a subway under Boston During the fall and winter of 1894-1895, the Common for the purpose of removing street­ engineering staff of the Boston Transit car traffic from Tremont Street. The council Commission took the Tremont Street Subway gave its consent, and the board was appoint­ from the planning phase to final design. Ground ed on January 1, 1894. After hearing from crit­ breaking took place on March 28, 1895, at a pub­ ics and supporters of the subway, various lic ceremony presided over by the governor. technical experts in the construction, trans­ Work progressed so rapidly that the first Tremont portation and health fields, as well as from Street section beneath Boston Common was proponents of elevated railways, the legisla­ opened on September 1, 1897, from Park Street to ture enacted a bill on July 2, 1894, to create the a portal in the Public Garden, near Arlington and Boston Transit Commission and the Boston Boylston Streets. (see Figure 6-3). Two additional Elevated Railway Company. The Boston segments of subway were opened later. The leg Transit Commission would be a governmen­ under Tremont Street from Boylston Street tal body whose primary function would be to Station to Pleasant Street (now Br~adway in the construct the Tremont Street Subway, now · Boston South End) opened on October 1, 1897, part of the Green Line (see Figure 6-2). The and on September 3, 1898, operations com­ Boston Elevated Railway Company, on the menced on the final section to Haymarket near other hand, would be privately owned and North Station (Whitehill, 1968) for streetcar traf­ charged with building elevated lines. The leg­ fic. The Haymarket end of the tunnel was con­ islation required a local referendum, and nected by an elevated loop that circled to the east Boston voters overwhelmingly approved the above Atlantic Avenue to connect South and bill on July 24, 1894. North stations in 1901 (see Figure 6-4). 296 CIVIL ENGINEERING PRACTICE 2011 /2012 FIGURE 6-2. Map of the Tremont Street subway (Green Line) showing gradual extensions . and their dates of completion. (Courtesy of spuimap.) The original Boston Elevated Railway Act December 4, 1908, streetcar service fully of 1894, which was amended in 1897, provid­ resumed through all parts of the subway that ed for a transit tunnel under Boston Harbor to were formerly used by the high-platform East Boston and the Boston segment of a sub­ trains of the elevated system. way to Cambridge. The East Boston Tunnel, The Boston Elevated Railway and the the first underwater transit tunnel in North Boston Transit Commission shared joint America, opened for streetcar traffic in 1904. responsibility for constructing a line to connect The tunnel, now part of the Blue Line, extend­ Park Street in Boston with Harvard Square in ed from Maverick Square, East Boston, to Cambridge. This line consists of a cut-and­ Court Street Station, near Scollay Square (now cover Cambridge Tunnel from Harvard that Government Center) in downtown Boston rises on the Longfellow Bridge, crosses over and allowed passenger transfer to the elevated the Charles River and then runs through a train at a midway station at Atlantic Avenue shield-driven, hand-mined tunnel under and State Street. Beacon Hill and under the Park Street Station. A 2 kilometer (1.23 mile) long subway tun­ This segment is now part of the Red Line (see nel was then dug under Washington Street Figure 6-1). The Cambridge section was built between 1905 and 1908 for the Sullivan­ by the Boston Elevated Railway, but all sec­ Dudley line and replaced the use of the tions in Boston were built by the Boston Transit Tremont Street Tunnel for service to Dudley Commission. Construction in Cambridge start- . Square. The Washington Street Tunnel, which ed July 12, 1909, on the first segment and the follows the old Boston Neck, was opened for subway began operation on March 23, 1912. public use on November 30, 1908. Removal of An extension to South Station, known as the high-platform and third-rail equipment (the Dorchester Tunnel, opened on December 3, third rail was never used) from the Tremont 1916. A further extension, which opened on Street Subway began at once, and on June 29, 1918, continued southward through a CIVIL ENGINEERING PRACTICE 2011 /2012 297 FIGURE 6-3. Construction trench for Tremont Street subway circa 1896. (Courtesy of the Society for the Preservation of New England Antiquities.) tunnel under Fort Point Channel to reach mont Street Subway near the Public Garden Andrew Square in South Boston. Incline to a portal in Governor Square, now The need for rapid transit service in the Kenmore Square (see Figure 6-2). As part of congested Back Bay area led to a proposal to the subway construction, the incline itself construct a new subway line, which was would be shifted to the middle of Boylston approved by the state legislature in 1907. The Street, parallel to its old location. The subway bill specified that the facility be built under the opened on October 3, 1914. Charles River Embankment and be kno,·vn as A short extension of the East Boston, street­ the Riverbank Subway, with stations located car based subway system took place between at Charles Street, Dartmouth Street and Mas­ 1912 and 1916. The East Boston Tunnel, when sachusetts Avenue. The Boston Elevated Rail­ originally opened, ran downtown to Court way strongly opposed the location of the Street Station, which was a stub-end single­ Riverbank Subway, and abutting property track terminal. Traffic volume through the owners, who were worried about the effects tunnel increased tremendously over the years, that the construction of the subway would and this single-track tum-back became an have on sewers and other underground utili­ operational nuisance. The answer was a short ties, joined together and protested to the legis­ 796 meter (2,610 foot) extension to Bowdoin lature. The protest succeeded and in 1911 the Square. The tunnel runs through the deformed lawmakers abandoned the Riverbank Subway Pleistocene soil deposits of Beacon Hill in favor of a line beneath Boylston Street. The (Boston Transit Commission, 1913; Kaye, Boylston Street Subway, now the Green Line, 1976b), where an underground station, a loop began construction in March 1912 for a two­ and a surface incline to Cambridge Street were track cut-and-cover tunnel, which would built. The loop allowed a quick turnaround for eventually run from a connection with the Tre- streetcars from East Boston, while the incline 298 C IVTT. F.r..:CL'\IEERJNt; PRACl'ICE 2011/ 2012 permitted cars to come to the surface and travel all the way through from Cambridge to East Boston. Streetcar tracks were laid across the Longfellow Bridge along with the sub­ way in the center. The East Boston Tunnel Extension was opened on March 8, 1916. The Boston Transit Commission had by this time opened the East Boston Tunnel and its extension to Bowdoin, the Washington Street Tunnel, the Boylston Street Subway and the Tremont Street Subway. In the late 1930s, the Boston Transit Department (which succeeded the Bos­ ton Transit Commission in 1918) began the Hunting­ ton Avenue Subway (see Figure 6-2), now a branch of the Green Line, through a variety of deposits (Aldrich & Lambrechts, 1986).
Recommended publications
  • Report Metropolitan Boston Transportation Commission
    SENATE No. 686 Cfre Commontocalti) of egasgacbusettg % REPORT OF THE METROPOLITAN BOSTON TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Created by Chapter 121 of the Resolves op 1957 January 1958 * BOSTON WRIGHT A POTTER PRINTING CO., LEGISLATIVE PRINTERS 32 DERNE STREET 1968 Cl')t CommoniuealtJ) ot spassacimsetts * RESOLVE OF AUTHORIZATION. [Chapter 121] Resolve providing for an investigati )N AND STUDY BY A SPECIAL COMMISSION RELATIVE TO THE CREATION OF A METE DPOLITAN RAPID TRANSIT COMMISSION TO STUDY THE EXTENSION OF RAPID TBANSI' ERVICE THROUGHOUT THE AREA SERVED BY THE METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHO TY AND RELATIVE TO TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES IN THE BOSTON METROPOLI AN AREA Resolved, That an unpaid special comr ion to consist of two members of the senate to be designated by the president thereof, three members of the house of representatives to be designated by the ipeaker thereof, and two persons to be appointed by the governor, is hereby es stablished for the purpose of making an investigation and study of the subject mai tter of current house document numbered 862, relative to providing for the creationn of a metropolitan rapid transit commis- sion to study the extension of rapid transi?it service throughout the area now served by the metropolitan transit authority: and of the investigation proposed by em- rent house document numbered 1736. ulative to transportation facilities in the Boston metropolitan area. Said commission shallbe provided with quarters in the state house or elsewhere, and may expend for clerical and other services and expenses such sums as may be appropriated therefor. Said commission shall report to the general court the re- sults of its investigation and study, and its recommendations, if any, together with drafts of legislation necessary to carry said recommendations into effect, by filing the same with the clerk of the senate on or before the fourth Wednesday of January in the year nineteen hundred and fifty-eight.
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts Oversize/ Overweight Permit Manual
    Oversize/ Overweight Permit Manual Massachusetts Foreword The Specialized Carriers & Rigging Association is pleased to publish this Oversize/ Overweight Permit Manual. Each state analysis includes information in a standardized format: contact, legal limits, special permit limits, general restrictions, types of permits available, fees, escort needs, fines, and restricted travel areas. Telephone numbers, locations, and hours of operation are listed for ports of entry and permit branches. However, readers are always advised to check with the state offices on current laws and procedures. This project could not have been completed without the advice and consultation of many state officials. We thank all of those who provided permit manuals, maps, laws, regulations, and various other forms of documentation. Legal Notice This SC&RA Oversize/Overweight Permit Manual is intended only to provide concise, easily read information, useful in planning movements of overdimensional and overweight loads. This Permit Manual is not intended to be an accurate summary of all the applicable laws and regulations. Users of the Permit Manual should confirm the information contained herein before dispatching vehicles and loads. The SC&RA cautions Permit Manual users that state laws and regulations are subject to change without notice, and that some time elapses between the effective date of such changes and the amendment of the Permit Manual to reflect those changes. The SC&RA assumes no responsibility for accident, injury, loss or claim, penalties or any other
    [Show full text]
  • Oversight Hearing on the Boston Central Artery/Tunnel Project
    S. HRG. 106–1110 OVERSIGHT HEARING ON THE BOSTON CENTRAL ARTERY/TUNNEL PROJECT HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE, AND TRANSPORTATION UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED SIXTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION MAY 3, 2000 Printed for the use of the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 80–706 PDF WASHINGTON : 2003 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Apr 24 2002 08:01 Jun 10, 2003 Jkt 080706 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\80706.TXT SCOM1 PsN: CAROLT SENATE COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE, AND TRANSPORTATION ONE HUNDRED SIXTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION JOHN MCCAIN, Arizona, Chairman TED STEVENS, Alaska ERNEST F. HOLLINGS, South Carolina CONRAD BURNS, Montana DANIEL K. INOUYE, Hawaii SLADE GORTON, Washington JOHN D. ROCKEFELLER IV, West Virginia TRENT LOTT, Mississippi JOHN F. KERRY, Massachusetts KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas JOHN B. BREAUX, Louisiana OLYMPIA J. SNOWE, Maine RICHARD H. BRYAN, Nevada JOHN ASHCROFT, Missouri BYRON L. DORGAN, North Dakota BILL FRIST, Tennessee RON WYDEN, Oregon SPENCER ABRAHAM, Michigan MAX CLELAND, Georgia SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas MARK BUSE, Republican Staff Director MARTHA P. ALLBRIGHT, Republican General Counsel KEVIN D. KAYES, Democratic Staff Director MOSES BOYD, Democratic Chief Counsel (II) VerDate Apr 24 2002 08:01 Jun 10, 2003 Jkt 080706 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 S:\WPSHR\GPO\DOCS\80706.TXT SCOM1 PsN: CAROLT C O N T E N T S Page Hearing held on May 3, 2000 ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Big Dig $458.2 Million Global Agreement
    Big Dig $458.2 Million Global Agreement State Agencies State A-Z Topics Skip to main content Need help resizing text? State Forms The Official Website of the Attorney General of Massachusetts Attorney General in Attorney General Martha Coakley About the Attorney Consumer Doing Business in Government News and Updates Public Safety Bureaus General's Office Resources Massachusetts Resources Home News and Updates Press Releases 2008 MARTHA COAKLEY For Immediate release - January 23, 2008 ATTORNEY GENERAL Big Dig Management Consultant and Designers To Pay $450 Million Media Contact Press Conference Audio and Supporting Documents Included Below Massachusetts Attorney General's Office: Emily LaGrassa (617) 727-2543 BOSTON - The joint venture of Bechtel/Parsons Brinckerhoff, Bechtel Infrastructure Corp., and PB Americas, Inc., f/k/a Parsons U.S. Attorney's Office: Brinckerhoff Quade and Douglas, Inc. ("Bechtel/Parsons Brinckerhoff"), the management consultant to the Central Artery/Tunnel Christina DiIorio-Sterling Project ("the Big Dig") has agreed to pay over $407 million to resolve its criminal and civil liabilities in connection with the collapse (617) 748-3356 of part of the I-90 Connector Tunnel ceiling and defects in the slurry walls of the Tip O'Neill tunnel. In addition, 24 Section Design Consultants-other contractors who worked on various parts of the project--have agreed to pay an additional $51 million to resolve certain cost recovery issues associated with the design of the Big Dig. In total, the United States and the Commonwealth will recover $458 million, including interest. United States Attorney Michael J. Sullivan, Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley, Theodore L.
    [Show full text]
  • Tolling and Transponders in Massachusetts
    DRIVING INNOVATION: TOLLING AND TRANSPONDERS IN MASSACHUSETTS By Wendy Murphy and Scott Haller White Paper No. 150 July 2016 Pioneer Institute for Public Policy Research Pioneer’s Mission Pioneer Institute is an independent, non-partisan, privately funded research organization that seeks to improve the quality of life in Massachusetts through civic discourse and intellectually rigorous, data-driven public policy solutions based on free market principles, individual liberty and responsibility, and the ideal of effective, limited and accountable government. This paper is a publication of the Center for Better Government, which seeks limited, accountable government by promoting competitive delivery of public services, elimination of unnecessary regulation, and a focus on core government functions. Current initiatives promote reform of how the state builds, manages, repairs and finances its transportation assets as well as public employee benefit reform. The Center for School Reform seeks to increase the education options available to parents and students, drive system-wide reform, and ensure accountability in public education. The Center’s work builds on Pioneer’s legacy as a recognized leader in the charter public school movement, and as a champion of greater academic rigor in Massachusetts’ elementary and secondary schools. Current initiatives promote choice and competition, school-based man- agement, and enhanced academic performance in public schools. The Center for Economic Opportunity seeks to keep Massachusetts competitive by pro- moting a healthy business climate, transparent regulation, small business creation in urban areas and sound environmental and development policy. Current initiatives promote market reforms to increase the supply of affordable housing, reduce the cost of doing business, and revitalize urban areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Computer-Aided Construction Planning for Boston's Central Artery Project
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD 1282 57 Computer-Aided Construction Planning for Boston's Central Artery Project BRIAN R. BRENNER Some new computer applications are being developed for and Roule IA applied to the construction planning and traffic studies associated with the design of the Central Artery and Third Harbor Tunnel in Boston. This project is one of the most massive and complex urban highway projects in the country. It features an immersed­ tube harbor tunnel, depression of the downtown expressway in a cut-and-cover tunnel without interrupting service on the existing overhead viaduct, major new or revised urban interchanges, and long-span river crossings. The construction site, with its old exist­ ing and historic buildings and subways, permits limited clear­ ances, posing formidable challenges to engineers planning the work. The computer applications described include computerized composite mapping for archeological planning; analysis of mul­ tilevel curved-girder viaducts; transportation forecasting using highway network models; planning associated with the construc­ tion of the depressed Central Artery tunnels; and computer-aided 1-90 planning and mitigation measures for underpinning, protection of a subway tube, and other construction problems. The Central Artery and Third Harbor Tunnel (CA/THT) SOUTH BOSTON project is a massive urban highway improvement job being planned and designed in Boston. A key map is shown in Figure 1. The work features the addition of a third harbor tunnel, a •••• • • • • Artery/Tunnel Project new immersed tube tunnel that will cross Boston Harbor and extend I-90 to Logan Airport and Route lA. The six-lane FIGURE 1 Key map, CA/THT project.
    [Show full text]
  • Southbay Report.Qxd
    August 30, 2004 Mr. Mark Maloney Director of the Boston Redevelopment Authority City of Boston 9th Floor City Hall Plaza Boston, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Maloney- On behalf of the South Bay Planning Study Task Force, I am pleased to present to you the South Bay Planning Study - Phase One. Over the past seven months our group of seventeen devoted volunteers, including representatives from Chinatown and the Leather District, have worked to create a plan for this important new part of the City of Boston. The vision that has emerged from our efforts is exciting and broad-reaching, and at the same time identifies many issues that will require further study in the second phase of our work. Conclusions that we have reached include: The project should be expanded from a set of parcels totaling 10 acres to a District consisting of 20 acres, transforming it from a project to a neighborhood. The district, which currently consists of highway infrastructure that divides and separates it from the neighborhoods, should become a series of city blocks that knit together and connect many important assets of the City of Boston. The southern entrance into the City that is now dominated by transportation infrastructure should instead be revealed as a great gateway portal for the City from the South. We must collectively work towards providing housing for all income levels and towards providing employment and employment training to benefit the adjacent neighborhoods. We should create a terminus to the Rose Kennedy Greenway in the form of a signature park that will help to meet the recreational needs of the neighborhoods and connect the Greenway to Fort Point Channel.
    [Show full text]
  • Big Dig Benefit: a Quicker Downtown Trip Turnpike Authority Report Cites Business Gain
    Big Dig benefit: A quicker downtown trip Turnpike Authority report cites business gain By Mac Daniel February 15, 2006 The $14.6-billion Big Dig project has cut the average trip through the center of Boston from 19.5 minutes to 2.8 minutes and has increased by 800,000 the number of people in Eastern Massachusetts who can now get to Logan International Airport in 40 minutes or less, according to a report that is scheduled to be released today. The report is the first to analyze and link the drive- time benefits of the project to its economic impact since the Big Dig built its final onramp last month. The report relies on data obtained since milestones were completed in 2003, such as opening of the Ted Williams Tunnel to all traffic and opening of the northbound and southbound Interstate 93 tunnels. Officials at the Massachusetts Turnpike Authority, which manages the project, released the executive summary portion of the report to the Globe yesterday. The improved drive times are projected to result in savings of $167 million annually: $24 million in vehicle operating costs and $143 million in time. The report estimates that the Big Dig will generate $7 billion in private investment and will create tens of the thousands of jobs in the South Boston waterfront area and along the I-93 corridor. The report was authored by the Economic Development Research Group, Inc., a Boston-based consulting firm, at the behest of the Massachusetts Turnpike Authority, which paid about $100,000 for the research, much of which was gathered from agencies such as the Boston Redevelopment Authority and the Boston Metropolitan Planning Organization, officials said.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 233/Monday, December 4, 2000
    Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 233 / Monday, December 4, 2000 / Notices 75771 2 departures. No more than one slot DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION In notice document 00±29918 exemption time may be selected in any appearing in the issue of Wednesday, hour. In this round each carrier may Federal Aviation Administration November 22, 2000, under select one slot exemption time in each SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, in the first RTCA Future Flight Data Collection hour without regard to whether a slot is column, in the fifteenth line, the date Committee available in that hour. the FAA will approve or disapprove the application, in whole or part, no later d. In the second and third rounds, Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the than should read ``March 15, 2001''. only carriers providing service to small Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. hub and nonhub airports may L. 92±463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: participate. Each carrier may select up is hereby given for the Future Flight Patrick Vaught, Program Manager, FAA/ to 2 slot exemption times, one arrival Data Collection Committee meeting to Airports District Office, 100 West Cross and one departure in each round. No be held January 11, 2000, starting at 9 Street, Suite B, Jackson, MS 39208± carrier may select more than 4 a.m. This meeting will be held at RTCA, 2307, 601±664±9885. exemption slot times in rounds 2 and 3. 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite Issued in Jackson, Mississippi on 1020, Washington, DC, 20036. November 24, 2000. e. Beginning with the fourth round, The agenda will include: (1) Welcome all eligible carriers may participate.
    [Show full text]
  • America's Tunnels / by Marcia Amidon Lusted
    Infrastructure of AMERICA’S Tunnels Marcia Amidon Lusted 2001 SW 31st Avenue Hallandale, FL 33009 www.mitchelllane.com Copyright © 2018 by Mitchell Lane Publishers. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced without written permission from the publisher. Printed and bound in the United States of America. Printing 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Design: Sharon Beck Editor: Jim Whiting Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Lusted, Marcia Amidon, author. Title: Infrastructure of America's tunnels / by Marcia Amidon Lusted. Description: Hallandale, FL : Mitchell Lane Publishers, [2018] | Series: Engineering feats | Includes bibliographical references and index. | Audience: Ages 9-13. Identifiers: LCCN 2017052245 | ISBN 9781680201505 (library bound) Subjects: LCSH: Tunnels—United States—Juvenile literature. | Infrastructure (Economics)—United States—Juvenile literature. Classification: LCC TA804.U6 L87 2018 | DDC 624.1/930973—dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2017052245 eBook ISBN: 9-781-6802-0151-2 PHOTO CREDITS: Cover, p. 1—Don Ramey Logan/cc by-sa 4.0; David Wilson/cc by-sa 2.0; Pedro Szekely/cc-by-sa 2.0; U.S. Navy/Public domain; US DoD Service/U.S. Federal Government/Public domain; Sahmeditor/Nicole Ezell/Public domain; Bernard Gagnon/GFDL/cc by-sa 3.0; Trevor Brown/EyeEm/Getty Images; (interior)—Hulinska_Yevheniia/Getty Images Plus. Cover, pp. 1, 6—Andrew Haliburton/Alamy Stock Photo; pp. 8-9—Michael Dwyer/Alamy Stock Photo; p. 10— Darren McCollester/Stringer/ Getty Images News, (inset)—Marcbela/Public domain; p. 11—AP Photo/Michael Dwyer, File/Associated Press; p. 12—AP Photo/ Mel Evans/Associated Press; p.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Artery/Tunnel Project: a Precast Bonanza
    PART 1 Central Artery/Tunnel Project: A Precast Bonanza by Vijay Chandra, P.E. Anthony 1. Ricci, RE. Senior Vice President Chief Bridge Engineer Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Central Artery/Tunnel Project Douglas, Inc. Massachusetts Turnpike Authority New York, New York Boston, Massachusetts This article provides an overview of the monumental efforts of Massachusetts transportation officials, their engineering consultants, and multitudes of construction industry professionals to ease congestion, improve motorist safety, and address issues of environmental quality in the heart of Boston, Massachusetts. The Central Artery/Tunnel Project is the largest highway construction job ever undertaken in the United States, involving many diverse types of precast concrete construction. maj or transportation infrastructure undertaking, • Standardized temporary structures utilizing precast con billed as “The Big Dig,” is transforming traffic op crete elements. A erations in and around Boston, Massachusetts. This • Precast segmental box girders integrated into cast-in-place $13.2 billion project, the biggest and most complex trans columns to provide seismically resistant connections. portation system ever undertaken in the United States, is • Precast segmental boxes cut at a skew to connect them on significant not only in this country, but worldwide. Nu either side of straddle bents. merous innovative construction techniques are being used, The project has brought out the best that precast con including: crete technology has to offer — in many cases utilizing • Precast tunnels jacked under railroad embankments. cutting edge techniques — and has been of immeasurable • Deep soil mixing to stabilize land reclaimed from the value to New England’s precasting industry. Precasters, ocean. faced with many complex and daunting challenges, are • Precast concrete immersed tube tunnels.
    [Show full text]
  • Boston a Guide Book to the City and Vicinity
    1928 Tufts College Library GIFT OF ALUMNI BOSTON A GUIDE BOOK TO THE CITY AND VICINITY BY EDWIN M. BACON REVISED BY LeROY PHILLIPS GINN AND COMPANY BOSTON • NEW YORK • CHICAGO • LONDON ATLANTA • DALLAS • COLUMBUS • SAN FRANCISCO COPYRIGHT, 1928, BY GINN AND COMPANY ALL RIGHTS RESERVED PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 328.1 (Cfte gtftengum ^regg GINN AND COMPANY • PRO- PRIETORS . BOSTON • U.S.A. CONTENTS PAGE PAGE Introductory vii Brookline, Newton, and The Way about Town ... vii Wellesley 122 Watertown and Waltham . "123 1. Modern Boston i Milton, the Blue Hills, Historical Sketch i Quincy, and Dedham . 124 Boston Proper 2 Winthrop and Revere . 127 1. The Central District . 4 Chelsea and Everett ... 127 2. The North End .... 57 Somerville, Medford, and 3. The Charlestown District 68 Winchester 128 4. The West End 71 5. The Back Bay District . 78 III. Public Parks 130 6. The Park Square District Metropolitan System . 130 and the South End . loi Boston City System ... 132 7. The Outlying Districts . 103 IV. Day Trips from Boston . 134 East Boston 103 Lexington and Concord . 134 South Boston .... 103 Boston Harbor and Massa- Roxbury District ... 105 chusetts Bay 139 West Roxbury District 105 The North Shore 141 Dorchester District . 107 The South Shore 143 Brighton District. 107 Park District . Hyde 107 Motor Sight-Seeing Trips . 146 n. The Metropolitan Region 108 Important Points of Interest 147 Cambridge and Harvard . 108 Index 153 MAPS PAGE PAGE Back Bay District, Showing Copley Square and Vicinity . 86 Connections with Down-Town Cambridge in the Vicinity of Boston vii Harvard University ...
    [Show full text]