On the Structure, Ecology and Distribution of the Species of Mitrula S.Lat
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Carotenoid Distribution in Nature
Chapter 1 Carotenoid Distribution in Nature Jennifer Alcaíno, Marcelo Baeza, and Víctor Cifuentes Abstract Carotenoids are naturally occurring red, orange and yellow pigments that are synthesized by plants and some microorganisms and fulfill many important physiological functions. This chapter describes the distribution of carotenoid in microorganisms, including bacteria, archaea, microalgae, filamentous fungi and yeasts. We will also focus on their functional aspects and applications, such as their nutritional value, their benefits for human and animal health and their potential protection against free radicals. The central metabolic pathway leading to the synthesis of carotenoids is described as the three following principal steps: (i) the synthesis of isopentenyl pyrophosphate and the formation of dimethylallyl pyrophosphate, (ii) the synthesis of geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate and (iii) the synthesis of carotenoids per se, highlighting the differences that have been found in several carotenogenic organisms and providing an evolutionary perspective. Finally, as an example, the synthesis of the xanthophyll astaxanthin is discussed. Keywords Carotenogenesis • Microbial carotenoids • Astaxanthin 1.1 Introduction Carotenoids are red, orange and yellow natural pigments that are synthesized by plants and some microorganisms fulfilling important physiological functions. For example, in photosynthetic organisms, carotenoids are essential for photosynthesis and photoprotection, whereas in non-photosynthetic organisms; they participate in alleviating photooxidative damage. Considering their properties, carotenoids have various industrial applications as dyes, and due to their various beneficial effects for health, they have been exploited by the food and nutraceutical industries and recently, by the pharmacological industry, with an estimated annual production greater than 100 million tons (Fraser and Bramley 2004). For these reasons, there J. -
The Family Geoglossaceae Spicuous Inoperculate Discomycetes
PERSOONIA Published by Rijksherbarium / Hortus Botanicus, Leiden Volume Part 405-430 15, 4, pp. (1994) Ultrastructure of the ascus apical apparatus in Leotia lubrica and some Geoglossaceae (Leotiales, Ascomycotina) Gerard+J.M. Verkley Rijksherbarium/Hortus Botanicus, P.O. Box 9514, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands The ultrastructure of the apical apparatus and lateral ascus wall is compared in Leotia lubrica and five species currently placed in the Geoglossaceae. The lateral ascus wall consists of two layers, of which the inner one increases in thickness in the apical apparatus. Considerable differences in substructure of both layers are described. On the basis of generalmorphology of the apical apparatus, structure and PA-TCH-SP reactivity of the apical thickening and annulus, and occurrence of an annular protrusion four main categories are distinguished. A reactive annulus is demonstrated in the apical apparatus of all species, including L. lubrica. The species studied are arranged as follows: Category 1a. Geoglossum nigritum and G. cookeianum; 1b. Trichoglossum hirsutum; 2. Leotia lubrica; 3. Microglossum viride; 4. Mitrula paludosa. Most fundamental is considered the position of the annulus in the api- cal thickening, either fully (category 1) or partly (2—4) occupying the apical thickening, either associated with an annular protrusion (3, 4) or not (1, 2). The data on the ultrastruc- ture of the ascus apical apparatus and lateral wall, and mode of dehiscence indicate that L. lubrica takes an isolated position, distant from the other Leotioideae (including Ombro- philoideae) and the Geoglossaceae. Geoglossum, Trichoglossum, and Microglossum can best be maintained as separate genera in the family Geoglossaceae. -
Suomen Helttasienten Ja Tattien Ekologia, Levinneisyys Ja Uhanalaisuus
Suomen ympäristö 769 LUONTO JA LUONNONVARAT Pertti Salo, Tuomo Niemelä, Ulla Nummela-Salo ja Esteri Ohenoja (toim.) Suomen helttasienten ja tattien ekologia, levinneisyys ja uhanalaisuus .......................... SUOMEN YMPÄRISTÖKESKUS Suomen ympäristö 769 Pertti Salo, Tuomo Niemelä, Ulla Nummela-Salo ja Esteri Ohenoja (toim.) Suomen helttasienten ja tattien ekologia, levinneisyys ja uhanalaisuus SUOMEN YMPÄRISTÖKESKUS Viittausohje Viitatessa tämän raportin lukuihin, käytetään lukujen otsikoita ja lukujen kirjoittajien nimiä: Esim. luku 5.2: Kytövuori, I., Nummela-Salo, U., Ohenoja, E., Salo, P. & Vauras, J. 2005: Helttasienten ja tattien levinneisyystaulukko. Julk.: Salo, P., Niemelä, T., Nummela-Salo, U. & Ohenoja, E. (toim.). Suomen helttasienten ja tattien ekologia, levin- neisyys ja uhanalaisuus. Suomen ympäristökeskus, Helsinki. Suomen ympäristö 769. Ss. 109-224. Recommended citation E.g. chapter 5.2: Kytövuori, I., Nummela-Salo, U., Ohenoja, E., Salo, P. & Vauras, J. 2005: Helttasienten ja tattien levinneisyystaulukko. Distribution table of agarics and boletes in Finland. Publ.: Salo, P., Niemelä, T., Nummela- Salo, U. & Ohenoja, E. (eds.). Suomen helttasienten ja tattien ekologia, levinneisyys ja uhanalaisuus. Suomen ympäristökeskus, Helsinki. Suomen ympäristö 769. Pp. 109-224. Julkaisu on saatavana myös Internetistä: www.ymparisto.fi/julkaisut ISBN 952-11-1996-9 (nid.) ISBN 952-11-1997-7 (PDF) ISSN 1238-7312 Kannen kuvat / Cover pictures Vasen ylä / Top left: Paljakkaa. Utsjoki. Treeless alpine tundra zone. Utsjoki. Kuva / Photo: Esteri Ohenoja Vasen ala / Down left: Jalopuulehtoa. Parainen, Lenholm. Quercus robur forest. Parainen, Lenholm. Kuva / Photo: Tuomo Niemelä Oikea ylä / Top right: Lehtolohisieni (Laccaria amethystina). Amethyst Deceiver (Laccaria amethystina). Kuva / Photo: Pertti Salo Oikea ala / Down right: Vanhaa metsää. Sodankylä, Luosto. Old virgin forest. Sodankylä, Luosto. Kuva / Photo: Tuomo Niemelä Takakansi / Back cover: Ukonsieni (Macrolepiota procera). -
Note on the New Record of Mitrula Paludosa (Geoglossaceae) in Korea
The Korean Journal of Mycology 한국균학회지 © The Korean Society of Mycology Kor. J. Mycol. 37(1) : 104-107 (2009) 콩나물버섯과 미기록종 Mitrula paludosa (습지등불버섯 : 신칭)의 보고 박용우1·구창덕1*·홍대의2·김태헌2 1충북대학교 산림학과, 2속리산국립공원 사무소 Note on the New Record of Mitrula paludosa (Geoglossaceae) in Korea Yong-Woo Park1, Chang-Duck Koo1*, Dae-Eui Hong2 and Tae-Heon Kim2 1Department of Forest Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 361-763, Korea 2Sogri Mountain National Park, Boun 376-860, Korea (Received April 9, 2009. Accepted June 15, 2009) ABSTRACT: Mitrula paludosa (Geoglossaccae, Helotiales, Ascomycetes) is reported about morphological and ecological characteristics for the first time in Korea. The mushroom fruited on rotten pine leaves or fine twigs in ditches with flowing or standing water in Sogri Mountain National Park from May to June. The apothecium of M. paludosa is 20 to 50 mm tall. The cap is bright yellow to orange, cylindrical to wrinkled ovoid and 5~10 × 10~20 mm. The stem is whitish and cylindrical distinctly set off from the cap. The ascospore is hyaline, smooth long elliptical fusoid with round ends and 13~17 × 1.5~2.0 μm. The ascus is unitunicate, 90~110 × 5~6 μm, and has eight spores biseriately lined to the inoperculate apex. Paraphyses are septate filiform, 95~120 × 1.0-1.5 μm, 7~10 μm longer than the asci. KEYWORDS: Ascomycetes, Ascospore, Ascus, Geoglossaceae, Mitrula paludosa Mitrula paludosa Fr.(1821)는 습지에 나는 노란색의 등 학교 산림학과 생태학실험실로 가져와서 알콜에 보관하면서 불모양 작은 버섯으로, 학명 Mitrula paludosa에서 Mitrula 자실체, 자낭, 자낭포자, 측균사의 특징을 광학현미경으로 관 는 '모자(Mitr) 같은(-ula)' 뜻이고, paludosa는 '습지(palud) 찰하였다. -
The Hereford Fungus Eaters a Pilgrimage to the Site of the First Fungal Foray George H
6 FUNGI Volume 11:2 Summer 2018 The Hereford Fungus Eaters A Pilgrimage to the Site of the First Fungal Foray George H. Caughey hen was the first fungal “foray?” You may think mushroom reproduction by spotting fungal “sperm.” Early in that hunters and gatherers have assembled to the process of acquiring fungal expertise, he poisoned himself, W collect mushrooms from time immemorial—and wife and child with foraged mushrooms, evidently mistaking likely you’re right. However, it appears that the first formal the “furiously poisonous” Entoloma sinuatum (then known outing of that name took place in the West Midlands in mid- 19th century Victorian England under the auspices of the Woolhope Naturalists’ Field Club. This event was organized in Herefordshire at the urging of polymath, pomologist, and fungus enthusiast Dr. Henry Graves Bull, who was assisted by two invited experts. The first was Edwin Lees, Esq. from a neighboring county, where 20 years earlier he co-founded the Worcestershire Naturalists’ Club and began publishing tracts on regional botany and acquiring familiarity with local mushrooms. He developed sufficient taxonomical repute to be elected a Fellow of the Linnean Society (F.L.S.), whose most illustrious member then was Charles Darwin. Like many British citizen-scientists of the era, Lees appended initials (“F.L.S., F.G.S., &c, &c”) to his name signifying membership in scientific societies, in his case more than a few. Worthington G. Smith The other foray “ringer” was Worthington George Smith of Dunstable. Smith was an architect, botanical artist, cartoonist and amateur mycologist who later became even better known as an authority on English fungi. -
Evolution of Helotialean Fungi (Leotiomycetes, Pezizomycotina): a Nuclear Rdna Phylogeny
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 41 (2006) 295–312 www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Evolution of helotialean fungi (Leotiomycetes, Pezizomycotina): A nuclear rDNA phylogeny Zheng Wang a,¤, Manfred Binder a, Conrad L. Schoch b, Peter R. Johnston c, Joseph W. Spatafora b, David S. Hibbett a a Department of Biology, Clark University, 950 Main Street, Worcester, MA 01610, USA b Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA c Herbarium PDD, Landcare Research, Private bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand Received 5 December 2005; revised 21 April 2006; accepted 24 May 2006 Available online 3 June 2006 Abstract The highly divergent characters of morphology, ecology, and biology in the Helotiales make it one of the most problematic groups in traditional classiWcation and molecular phylogeny. Sequences of three rDNA regions, SSU, LSU, and 5.8S rDNA, were generated for 50 helotialean fungi, representing 11 out of 13 families in the current classiWcation. Data sets with diVerent compositions were assembled, and parsimony and Bayesian analyses were performed. The phylogenetic distribution of lifestyle and ecological factors was assessed. Plant endophytism is distributed across multiple clades in the Leotiomycetes. Our results suggest that (1) the inclusion of LSU rDNA and a wider taxon sampling greatly improves resolution of the Helotiales phylogeny, however, the usefulness of rDNA in resolving the deep relationships within the Leotiomycetes is limited; (2) a new class Geoglossomycetes, including Geoglossum, Trichoglossum, and Sarcoleo- tia, is the basal lineage of the Leotiomyceta; (3) the Leotiomycetes, including the Helotiales, Erysiphales, Cyttariales, Rhytismatales, and Myxotrichaceae, is monophyletic; and (4) nine clades can be recognized within the Helotiales. -
Floating Island Macromycetes from the Carpatho-Pannonian Region in Europe
ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Sydowia Jahr/Year: 2009 Band/Volume: 61 Autor(en)/Author(s): Zöld-Balogh A., Dima B., Albert László, Babos M., Balogh M., Bratek Zoltán Artikel/Article: Floating island macromycetes from the Carpatho-Pannonian Region in Europe. 149-176 ©Verlag Ferdinand Berger & Söhne Ges.m.b.H., Horn, Austria, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Floating island macromycetes from the Carpatho- Pannonian Region in Europe AÂ .ZoÈld-Balogh1, B. Dima2, L. Albert3, M. Babos4, M. Balogh5 & Z. Bratek1 1 Department of Plant Physiology and Molecular Plant Biology, EoÈtvoÈs LoraÂnd University, PaÂzmaÂny PeÂter seÂtaÂny 1/c, Budapest, H-1117 Hungary 2 Department of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, Faculty of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Szent IstvaÂn University, PaÂter KaÂroly u. 1, GoÈdoÈlloÍ, H-2103 Hungary 3 Karthauzi u. 4/a, Budapest, H-1121 Hungary 4 Szentes u. 52/a, Budapest, H-1147 Hungary 5 Paluster Bt. for Ecology and Conservation, VoÈlgy u. 21, Budapest, H-1214, Hungary ZoÈld-Balogh AÂ ., Dima B., Albert L., Babos M., Balogh M. & BratekZ. (2008) Floating island macromycetes from the Carpatho-Pannonian Region in Europe. ± Sydowia 61 (1): 149±176. This study summarizes research data of the last 50 years on basidiomes and ascomycetes from sudds in the Carpathian and Pannonian Regions in Europe. The 76 basidiomycetes taxa collected from Sphagnum sudds (282 collections) belong to 3 orders (Agaricales, Boletales and Russulales), 15 families, and 25 genera. The 77 collections from non-Sphagnum sudds contained 33 species representing 4 orders (the above mentioned and Cantharellales), 12 families and 18 genera. -
An Inventory of Fungal Diversity in Ohio Research Thesis Presented In
An Inventory of Fungal Diversity in Ohio Research Thesis Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation with research distinction in the undergraduate colleges of The Ohio State University by Django Grootmyers The Ohio State University April 2021 1 ABSTRACT Fungi are a large and diverse group of eukaryotic organisms that play important roles in nutrient cycling in ecosystems worldwide. Fungi are poorly documented compared to plants in Ohio despite 197 years of collecting activity, and an attempt to compile all the species of fungi known from Ohio has not been completed since 1894. This paper compiles the species of fungi currently known from Ohio based on vouchered fungal collections available in digitized form at the Mycology Collections Portal (MyCoPortal) and other online collections databases and new collections by the author. All groups of fungi are treated, including lichens and microfungi. 69,795 total records of Ohio fungi were processed, resulting in a list of 4,865 total species-level taxa. 250 of these taxa are newly reported from Ohio in this work. 229 of the taxa known from Ohio are species that were originally described from Ohio. A number of potentially novel fungal species were discovered over the course of this study and will be described in future publications. The insights gained from this work will be useful in facilitating future research on Ohio fungi, developing more comprehensive and modern guides to Ohio fungi, and beginning to investigate the possibility of fungal conservation in Ohio. INTRODUCTION Fungi are a large and very diverse group of organisms that play a variety of vital roles in natural and agricultural ecosystems: as decomposers (Lindahl, Taylor and Finlay 2002), mycorrhizal partners of plant species (Van Der Heijden et al. -
Evolution of Reproductive Morphology in Leaf Endophytes
Evolution of Reproductive Morphology in Leaf Endophytes Zheng Wang1*, Peter R. Johnston2, Zhu L. Yang3, Jeffrey P. Townsend1 1 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America, 2 Herbarium PDD, Landcare Research, Auckland, New Zealand, 3 Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Biogeography, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, China Abstract The endophytic lifestyle has played an important role in the evolution of the morphology of reproductive structures (body) in one of the most problematic groups in fungal classification, the Leotiomycetes (Ascomycota). Mapping fungal morphologies to two groups in the Leiotiomycetes, the Rhytismatales and Hemiphacidiaceae reveals significant divergence in body size, shape and complexity. Mapping ecological roles to these taxa reveals that the groups include endophytic fungi living on leaves and saprobic fungi living on duff or dead wood. Finally, mapping of the morphologies to ecological roles reveals that leaf endophytes produce small, highly reduced fruiting bodies covered with fungal tissue or dead host tissue, while saprobic species produce large and intricate fruiting bodies. Intriguingly, resemblance between asexual conidiomata and sexual ascomata in some leotiomycetes implicates some common developmental pathways for sexual and asexual development in these fungi. Citation: Wang Z, Johnston PR, Yang ZL, Townsend JP (2009) Evolution of Reproductive Morphology in Leaf Endophytes. PLoS ONE 4(1): e4246. doi:10.1371/ journal.pone.0004246 Editor: Jerome Chave, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, France Received September 25, 2008; Accepted December 17, 2008; Published January 22, 2009 Copyright: ß 2009 Wang et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. -
Mitrula Paludosa Mitrula ≡ Paludosa Var
© Demetrio Merino Alcántara [email protected] Condiciones de uso Mitrula paludosa Fr., Utkast. Sv. Fl., Edn 3 3: 664 (1816) Sclerotiniaceae, Helotiales, Leotiomycetidae, Leotiomycetes, Pezizomycotina, Ascomycota, Fungi = Clavaria epiphylla Dicks., Fasc. pl. crypt. brit. (London) 3: 22 (1793) = Clavaria phalloides Bull., Herb. Fr.: 214, tab. 463, fig. 3 (1789) = Clavaria spathula O.F. Müll., Fl. Danic. 4: tab. 658 (1775) = Helvella aurantiaca A. Cumino, Mém. Acad. imp. sci., litt. beaux-arts Turin, Mém. prés.: 221 (1805) = Leotia dicksonii Pers., Syn. meth. fung. (Göttingen) 2: 612 (1801) = Leotia epiphylla (Dicks.) Hook., Fl. Scot. 2: 30 (1821) = Leotia uliginosa Grev., Fl. Edin.: 416 (1824) = Leotia uliginosa var. aurantiaca (A. Cumino) Pers., Mycol. eur. (Erlanga) 1: 200 (1822) = Mitrula dicksonii (Pers.) Gray, Nat. Arr. Brit. Pl. (London) 1: 661 (1821) ≡ Mitrula paludosa f. lilacinorosea Verheyen, Sterbeeckia 14: 8 (1986) ≡ Mitrula paludosa f. pallens Eisf. & Benedix, 3: 402 (1962) ≡ Mitrula paludosa Fr., Utkast. Sv. Fl., Edn 3 3: 664 (1816) f. paludosa ≡ Mitrula paludosa var. aurantiaca (A. Cumino ex Boud.) Damblon & Lambinon, (1959) [1958] ≡ Mitrula paludosa Fr., Utkast. Sv. Fl., Edn 3 3: 664 (1816) var. paludosa = Mitrula phalloides (Bull.) Chevall., Fl. gén. env. Paris (Paris) 1: 214 (1826) = Mitrula phalloides var. aurantiaca (A. Cumino) Boud. = Mitrula phalloides var. castanea Velen., Monogr. Discom. Bohem. (Prague): 374 (1934) = Mitrula phalloides var. cylindrica Velen., Monogr. Discom. Bohem. (Prague): 374 (1934) = Mitrula phalloides var. pachyceps P. Karst., Acta Soc. Fauna Flora fenn. 2(no. 6): 110 (1885) [1881-1885] = Mitrula phalloides (Bull.) Chevall., Fl. gén. env. Paris (Paris) 1: 214 (1826) var. phalloides = Mitrula spathula (O.F. -
Helotiales, Ascomycota) Based on Cultural, Morphological, and Molecular Studies1
American Journal of Botany 92(9): 1565–1574. 2005. LIFE HISTORY AND SYSTEMATICS OF THE AQUATIC DISCOMYCETE MITRULA (HELOTIALES, ASCOMYCOTA) BASED ON CULTURAL, MORPHOLOGICAL, AND MOLECULAR STUDIES1 ZHENG WANG,2 MANFRED BINDER, AND DAVID S. HIBBETT Department of Biology, Clark University, 950 Main Street, Worcester, Massachusetts 01610 USA Mitrula species represent a group of aquatic discomycetes with uncertain position in the Helotiales and an unknown life history. Mitrula species were studied using a combination of cultural, morphological, and molecular techniques. Pure colonies were isolated from Mitrula elegans, and conidia were induced in vitro. Herbarium materials from Europe, Asia, and North America were studied. Sequences of rDNA, including partial small subunit rDNA, large subunit DNA and ITS, were used to infer phylogenetic relationships both within Mitrula and between Mitrula and other inoperculate discomycetes, with special attention to fungi that resemble Mitrula in morphology or ecology. Equally weighted parsimony analyses, likelihood analyses, constrained parsimony analyses, and Bayesian analyses were performed. Results suggest that (1) the anamorph of M. elegans produces brown bicellular conidia, (2) a new subalpine species M. brevispora is distinct, (3) more than six lineages and clades can be recognized in Mitrula, (4) the morphological species M. elegans is not monophyletic, (5) a close relationship between Mitrula and either Geoglossaceae or Sclerotiniaceae is not supported, (6) the Helotiaceae is paraphyletic, and (7) Mitrula belongs to a clade within the Helotiales that also includes other aero-aquatic genera, Cudoniella, Hydrocina, Vibrissea, Ombrophila, and Hymenoscyphus. Key words: aquatic fungi; decomposition; ecology; mitosporic fungi; vernal pools. Mitrula Fr. species, the so-called swamp beacons, represent litter in forest ecosystems. -
Rijksherbarium, Leiden
PERSOONIA Published by the Rijksherbarium, Leiden Volume Part 2, 3, pp. 81-96 (1964) On some white-spored Geoglossaceae R. A. Maas+Geesteranus Rijksherbarium, Leiden (With 22 Text-figures) of characterized colourless and Some genera Geoglossaceae, by spores iodine reaction ofthe with the positive ascus pore, are compared respect to of the is reduced the of structure stipe. Ochroglossum to synonymy Microglos- Mitrula is The is sum. regarded as a monotypic genus. generic nameHeyderia restored. Thuemenidium is reintroduced to replace Corynetes. Nothomitra is accomodate proposed as a new genus to N. cinnamomea, a new species. Early in 1963, Mr. J. T. Palmer, Woodley (near Stockport), sent me two collec- tions of a geoglossaceous fungus. The specimens had been collected in Austria and showed colourless and iodinereaction of the spores a positive ascus pore. According Nannfeldt's three of to key (1942), these characters are common to genera Geoglos- and Mitrula. ruled saceae: Corynetes, Microglossum, Corynetes was immediately out, as the Austrian material was not black and the fertile head differently shaped, but it of of was impossible to decide in favour either the two remaining genera. The speci- mens resembled Mitrula the of the fertile but the rather as to shape head, spores were those ofa Microglossum. It was decided to search for other criteria by which it would be without This led possible to distinguish the two genera ambiguity. to some results. It found that there existed unexpected was (i) no generally agreed opinion on the generic limits between Corynetes, Microglossum, and Mitrula; (ii) the generic the Mitrula name Corynetes, although universally used, was not correct name; (iii) as understood in Europe and North America proved most heterogeneous; (iv) the Austrian material did not fitany described genus; (v) the structure of the stipe proved useful additional character in the distinction of a genera.