DOCSLIB.ORG

Argentine Chamber of Deputies, 1904-1955: Roll Call Records and Member Characteristics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Argentine Chamber of Deputies, 1904-1955: Roll Call Records and Member Characteristics Argentine Chamber of Deputies, 1904-1955: Roll Call Records and Member Characteristics Principal Investigator Peter H. Smith TERMS OF USE Users of these data are requested to cite them properly. Below is an example of the citation of this work. You should consult a style manual specific to your discipline and modify the example to maintain consistency in punctuation and typeface. Argentine Chamber of Deputies, 1904-1955: Roll Call Records and Member Characteristics. [machine- readable data file] / Peter H. Smith [principal investigator] / Data and Information Services Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison [distributor]. <http://www.disc.wisc.edu/archive/Argentina/index.html>. These data and other materials are solely for research or statistical purposes. They cannot be redistributed without the written agreement of Data and Information Services Center (DISC). Authors of publications based on these data are required to send citations of their published works to DISC ([email protected]) for inclusion in a list of related publications. Data & Information Services Center (DISC) 3314 Sewell Social Science Building University of Wisconsin-Madison 1180 Observatory Drive Madison, Wisconsin 53706 (608) 262-0750 Fax: (608) 262-9711 http://www.disc.wisc.edu/ ARGENTINE CHAHBER OF DEPUTIES ROLL CALLS, SESSIONS 1904-1955 Collected by Professor Peter Smith Department of History Deposited at The Data and Program Library Service University of Wisconsin-i'iadison April 1974 m.DERING OF CARDS First card= copy of card 1 of biography data set (type 01) Second card = first roll call card, first year of legislative session (that is, card type 11) Third card= second roll call card, first year of legislative session (card type 12) IF APPLICABLE Fourth card= first roll call card, second year of legislative session (card 21) BUT IF TRERE IS tlO CARD TYPE 12, THIS WOULD APPEAR AS THE THIRD CARD IN THE DATf.. SET, IWT TPE FOURTJ1 Fifth card= second roll call card, second vear of legislative session (card type 22) IF APPLICABLE sEssim~ CATWS PRESEfT 1904--05 Biop card, card 11, card 21 1906-07 Biog card, card 11, card 21 1908-09 Biog card, card 11, card 21 1910-11 Biog card, card 11, card 21 1912-13 Biog card, card 11, card 21 1914-15 Biog card, card 11, card 21 1916-17 Eiog card, card 11, card 21 1918-19 Biog card, card 11, card 21 1920-21 :Cio~ carcl, card 11, card 21 1922-23 Biog card, card 11, card 21 1924-25 Biog card, card 11, card 21 1926-27 Iliog card, card 11, card 21 1928--29 Bio~ card, card 11, card 21 1930 Biog card, card 11 1932-33 Biog card, card 11, card 21 1934-35 Biog card, card 11, card 21 1936-37 Bfog card, card 11, card 21 1938-39 Biog card, card 11, card 21 1940-41 Biog card, card 11, card 21 1942 Biog card, card 11 •) ') 1946-47 Biog card, card 11, card 12, card 13, card 21, card -'-~ 1948-49 Biog card, card 11, card 12, card 21, card 22 1950-51 Biog cardt card 11, card :'.1, card ---'>? 1952-54 Biog cart!, c.ard 11, card 21, card 31 1955 Biog card, card 11 ARGENTINE CHAMBER OF DEPUTIES ~OLL CALLS, SESSIONS 1904-1955 JORMAT FOR ROLL CALL Cols. Variable ____ ,, __ ---------- 1-4 Personal identification number 5-6 Type of data card 11 = first roll call card, first year of session 12 = second roll call card, first year of session 13 = third roll call card, first year of session 21 = first roll call card, second year of session 22 = second roll call card, second year of session 7 Blank 8-9 Congressional year (last two digits only) 10 Status 1 = regularly elected Deputy 2 = filling out another Deputy's term 3 = delegado (appointee from federal territory, with no voting rights in Chamber) 11-12 Province represented in this session (see Appendix to Biography Data Set) 13-14 Political Party represented in this session (see Appendix to Biography Data Set) 15 First roll call 16 Second roll call 17 Third roll call (and so on, with as many columns punched as there are roll calls, which are entered according to chronological order) ROLL CALL VOTU:G CODE Position on roll calls (one roll call per column) 0 = ineligible; presiding officer or not a member On votes for officers of Chamber: l = eventual winner 2 = runner-up 3 = third-place candidate 4 = fourth-place candidate 5 = fifth or lower-olace candidate (original code allowed for 6 places, but not in this particular data set) - !. - 7 = abstain (in this data set, winners of elections who cast courtesy votes for other .Jeputies have been given 7 on such roll calls) On substantive issues: 6 = yes 7 = absta:i.n 3 = no Absenteeism: 9 = one of at least five consecutive abstentions; Deputy probably absent ,. SESSTOI; 1904-05 19'l4 Date Column P,oll ~:all (mo/_<J._ayjvear) 15 Officership: Provision.al President 4/26/04 16 Officership: President 5/02/04 17 Officership: Vice-president 5/02/04 18 Officership: Second \'ice-president 5/02/04 19 Off icersh:i.p: Comisi6n de CuentaA 5/06/04 20 l)fficership: Comisi6n de Cuentas 5/06/04 21 Officership: Comisi6n de Cucntas 5/06/04 22 Officership: Comisi6n de Cuentas 5/06/04 23 Officership: Comision de Cuentas 5/06/04 24 Officership: Comisi6n de Cuentas 5/06/04 25 Officership: President 7/13/04 26 Officership: Vice-president 7/13/04 27 0fficcrship: Second Vice-president 7 /13/04 28 Designate for Presidential Succession 8/31/04 1905 15 Officership: Provisional President 4/28/05 16 Officership: President 4/28/05 17 Officership: Vice-president 4/28/05 18 Officership: Second Vice-president 4/28/05 19 Officership: President 7/14/05 20 Officership: Vice-president 7 /H/05 21 Officership: Second Vice-president 7/14/05 22 Vote on Electoral ~eform 7/15/05 23 Designate for Presidential Succession 9/01/05 1906 :Jate Column Eoll Call (mo/dav/vear) 15 Officership: Provisional President 4/26/06 16 Officership: President 5/08/06 17 Officership: Vice-president 5/08/06 18 Officership: Second Vice-president 5/08/06 19 Officership: Comisi6n de Cuentas 5/16/06 20 Officership: Comisi6n de Cuentas 5/16/06 21 Off :i.cership: Comision de Cuentas 5/16/06 22 Off icershiTJ: ComiRi6n de Cucntas 5/16/06 23 ('fficership: Conisi6n de Cuentas 5/16/06 24 Officership: Comision de Cuentas 5/16/06 25 nfficership: President 7 /13/% 26 Officership: Vice-president 7 /13/06 27 Officership: Second Vice-president 7 /13/06 28 nesignate for Presidential Succession 9/05/06 29 Approval of Election in Buenos Ai.res 9/12/06 30 Officership: President 10/24/06 31 Officership: Vice-oresident 10/24/()6 32 Officership: Second Vice-president 10/24/06 1907 15 Officership: Provisional President 4/29/07 16 Officership: President 4/29/07 17 Officership: Vice-president 4/29/07 18 Officership: Vice-president 4/29/07 19 Officership: Second Vice-president !1/29/07 20 Officership: Comision de Cuentas 5/31/07 21 Officership: Comision de Cuentas 5/31/07 22 Officership: Comisi6n de Cuentas 5/31/07 23 Officership: Comisi6n de Cuentas 6/07/07 24 Officership: Comisi6n <le Cuentas 6/07/07 25 Officership: Comisi6n de Cuentas 6/07/07 26 Officership: Comisi6n de Cuentas 6/07/07 - 2 - Date Column Roll Call (mo/day/year) 27 Officership: President 7/15/07 28 Officership: Vice-president 7/15/07 29 Officership; Second Vice-president 7/15/07 30 Designate for Presidential Succession 9/02/07 31 Intervention in Corri0.ntes 9/16/07 (Decision: to take it up in next session) srssro:; 190;:;-09. 1908 Date Column Roll Call (mo/day/vear) 15 Officership: Provisional President 5/01/08 16 Officership: President 5/07/03 17 Officership: President 5/07/08 18 Officership: Second Vice-president 5/07/08 19 Budget Bill 5/13/08 20 0fficership: Comisi~n de Cuentas 5/18/()8 21 Officership: Comision de Cnentas 5/18/fJ8 22 Officership: President 7/20/08 23 Officership: Vice-presid•'nt 7/20/08 24 Officership: Second qice-president 7/20/08 25 Designate for Presidential Succession 9/02/08 15 Officership: President 5/0.5/09 16 Officership: Vice-president 5/05/09 17 Officership: Second Vice-president 5/05/09 rn Officership: Pr~~i<lcnt 7/19/09 19 Officership: Vice-president 7/19/'1') 20 Officership: Second '!ice-president 7/19/09 21 Intervention in co'rdo:,a 8/11/00 22 ,lesi?.:nate for Presidential Successi.on 9/01/09 SESSH':·: l '.'10-11 191n Date Column --- :'."'.ol l Call (mo/day/year) 15 Officership: Provisional President 4/26/10 16 0ff icership: Presi.dent 5/02/10 17 Officership: Vice-prP.sident 5/02/10 18 Officership: Second Vice-president 5/02/10 19 Officership: President 7/15/10 20 Officership: Vicc···president 7 /15/10 21 Officership: Second Vi.ce-president 7/15/10 22 Designate for Presidential Succession 9/02/10 1911 15 Officership: President 5/05/11 16 Officership: Vice-president 5/05/11 17 Officership: Second Vice-president 5/05/11 18 Officership: President 7 /17 /11 19 Officership: Vice-president 7 /17 /11 20 Off ice rs hip; Second Vice-president 7 /17 /11 21 Investifation of Judicial Neglip,ence 8/21/11 22 Designate for Presi.dential Succession 9/01/11 23 Designation of Interim Secretary 9/01/11 24 Opposition to Presidential Objections 9/29/11 25 Electoral Reform 11/24/11 26 Opposition to Presidential Ohjections 2/13/12 SESSION 1912-13 1912 Date Column Roll Call (mo I oaylv"-':Jl_I) 15 Officership: Provisional President 5/13/12 16 Officership: President 6/03/12 17 Officership: Vice-president 6/03/12 18 Officership: Second Vice-president 6/03/12 19 Subsidy for.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Impact of Federalism on National Party Cohesion in Brazil
    National Party Cohesion in Brazil 259 SCOTT W. DESPOSATO University of Arizona The Impact of Federalism on National Party Cohesion in Brazil This article explores the impact of federalism on national party cohesion. Although credited with increasing economic growth and managing conflict in countries with diverse electorates, federal forms of government have also been blamed for weak party systems because national coalitions may be divided by interstate conflicts. This latter notion has been widely asserted, but there is virtually no empirical evidence of the relationship or even an effort to isolate and identify the specific features of federal systems that might weaken parties. In this article, I build and test a model of federal effects in national legislatures. I apply my framework to Brazil, whose weak party system is attributed, in part, to that country’s federal form of government. I find that federalism does significantly reduce party cohesion and that this effect can be tied to multiple state-level interests but that state-level actors’ impact on national party cohesion is surprisingly small. Introduction Federalism is one of the most widely studied of political institutions. Scholars have shown how federalism’s effects span a wide range of economic, policy, and political dimensions (see Chandler 1987; Davoodi and Zou 1998; Dyck 1997; Manor 1998; Riker 1964; Rodden 2002; Ross 2000; Stansel 2002; Stein 1999; Stepan 1999; Suberu 2001; Weingast 1995). In economic spheres, federalism has been lauded for improving market competitiveness and increasing growth; in politics, for successfully managing diverse and divided countries. But one potential cost of federalism is that excessive political decentralization could weaken polities’ ability to forge broad coalitions to tackle national issues.1 Federalism, the argument goes, weakens national parties because subnational conflicts are common in federal systems and national politicians are tied to subnational interests.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Dependence in Brazil's 2010 Elections for Federal Deputy*
    Corporate Dependence in Brazil's 2010 Elections for Federal Deputy* Wagner Pralon Mancuso Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil Dalson Britto Figueiredo Filho Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Brazil Bruno Wilhelm Speck Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil Lucas Emanuel Oliveira Silva Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Brazil Enivaldo Carvalho da Rocha Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Brazil What is the profile of candidates whose electoral campaigns are the most dependent on corporate donations? Our main objective is to identify factors that help explaining the level of corporate dependence among them. We answer this question in relation to the 2010 elections for federal deputy in Brazil. We test five hypotheses: 01. right-wing party candidates are more dependent than their counterparts on the left; 02. government coalition candidates are more dependent than candidates from the opposition; 03. incumbents are more dependent on corporate donations than challengers; 04. businesspeople running as candidates receive more corporate donations than other candidates; and 05. male candidates are more dependent than female candidates. Methodologically, the research design combines both descriptive and multivariate statistics. We use OLS regression, cluster analysis and the Tobit model. The results show support for hypotheses 01, 03 and 04. There is no empirical support for hypothesis 05. Finally, hypothesis 02 was not only rejected, but we find evidence that candidates from the opposition receive more contributions from the corporate sector. Keywords: Corporate dependence; elections; campaign finance; federal deputies. * http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1981-38212016000300004 For data replication, see bpsr.org.br/files/archives/Dataset_Mancuso et al We thank the editors for their careful work and the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions.
    [Show full text]
  • The November 2011 Elections in Nicaragua: a Study Mission Report of the Carter Center
    The November 2011 Elections in Nicaragua Study Mission Report Waging Peace. Fighting Disease. Building Hope. The November 2011 Elections in Nicaragua: A Study Mission Report of the Carter Center THE NOVEMBER 2011 ELECTIONS IN NICARAGUA: A STUDY MISSION REPORT OF THE CARTER CENTER OVERVIEW On November 6, 2011 Nicaragua held general elections for president and vice president, national and departmental deputies to the National Assembly, and members of the Central American Parliament. Fraudulent local elections in 2008, a questionable Supreme Court decision in October 2009 to permit the candidacy of incumbent President Daniel Ortega, and a presidential decree in January 2010 extending the Supreme Electoral Council (CSE) magistrates in office after their terms expired provided the context for a deeply flawed election process. Partisan election preparations were followed by a non-transparent election day and count. The conditions for international and domestic election observation, and for party oversight, were insufficient to permit verification of compliance with election procedures and Nicaraguan electoral law, and numerous anomalies cast doubt on the quality of the process and honesty of the vote count. The most important opposition party rejected the election as fraudulent but took its seats in the legislature. Nicaragua’s Supreme Electoral Council dismissed opposition complaints and announced that President Daniel Ortega had been re-elected to a third term. In addition, the official results showed that Ortega’s Sandinista National Liberation Front (FSLN) party had won enough legislative seats both to reform articles of the constitution (requires a 60% majority) and to call a constituent assembly to write a new constitution (requires 66%).
    [Show full text]
  • Nicaragua: in Brief
    Nicaragua: In Brief Maureen Taft-Morales Specialist in Latin American Affairs September 14, 2016 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R44560 Nicaragua: In Brief Summary This report discusses Nicaragua’s current politics, economic development and relations with the United States and provides context for Nicaragua’s controversial November 6, 2016, elections. After its civil war ended, Nicaragua began to establish a democratic government in the early 1990s. Its institutions remained weak, however, and they have become increasingly politicized since the late 1990s. Current President Daniel Ortega was a Sandinista (Frente Sandinista de Liberacion Nacional, FSLN) leader when the Sandinistas overthrew the dictatorship of Anastasio Somoza in 1979. Ortega was elected president in 1984. An electorate weary of war between the government and U.S.-backed contras denied him reelection in 1990. After three failed attempts, he won reelection in 2006, and again in 2011. He is expected to win a third term in November 2016 presidential elections. As in local, municipal, and national elections in recent years, the legitimacy of this election process is in question, especially after Ortega declared that no domestic or international observers would be allowed to monitor the elections and an opposition coalition was effectively barred from running in the 2016 elections. As a leader of the opposition in the legislature from 1990 to 2006, and as president since then, Ortega slowly consolidated Sandinista—and personal—control over Nicaraguan institutions. As Ortega has gained power, he reputedly has become one of the country’s wealthiest men. His family’s wealth and influence have grown as well, inviting comparisons to the Somoza family dictatorship.
    [Show full text]
  • LETTER to G20, IMF, WORLD BANK, REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT BANKS and NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS
    LETTER TO G20, IMF, WORLD BANK, REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT BANKS and NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS We write to call for urgent action to address the global education emergency triggered by Covid-19. With over 1 billion children still out of school because of the lockdown, there is now a real and present danger that the public health crisis will create a COVID generation who lose out on schooling and whose opportunities are permanently damaged. While the more fortunate have had access to alternatives, the world’s poorest children have been locked out of learning, denied internet access, and with the loss of free school meals - once a lifeline for 300 million boys and girls – hunger has grown. An immediate concern, as we bring the lockdown to an end, is the fate of an estimated 30 million children who according to UNESCO may never return to school. For these, the world’s least advantaged children, education is often the only escape from poverty - a route that is in danger of closing. Many of these children are adolescent girls for whom being in school is the best defence against forced marriage and the best hope for a life of expanded opportunity. Many more are young children who risk being forced into exploitative and dangerous labour. And because education is linked to progress in virtually every area of human development – from child survival to maternal health, gender equality, job creation and inclusive economic growth – the education emergency will undermine the prospects for achieving all our 2030 Sustainable Development Goals and potentially set back progress on gender equity by years.
    [Show full text]
  • Federalism, Bicameralism, and Institutional Change: General Trends and One Case-Study*
    brazilianpoliticalsciencereview ARTICLE Federalism, Bicameralism, and Institutional Change: General Trends and One Case-study* Marta Arretche University of São Paulo (USP), Brazil The article distinguishes federal states from bicameralism and mechanisms of territorial representation in order to examine the association of each with institutional change in 32 countries by using constitutional amendments as a proxy. It reveals that bicameralism tends to be a better predictor of constitutional stability than federalism. All of the bicameral cases that are associated with high rates of constitutional amendment are also federal states, including Brazil, India, Austria, and Malaysia. In order to explore the mechanisms explaining this unexpected outcome, the article also examines the voting behavior of Brazilian senators constitutional amendments proposals (CAPs). It shows that the Brazilian Senate is a partisan Chamber. The article concludes that regional influence over institutional change can be substantially reduced, even under symmetrical bicameralism in which the Senate acts as a second veto arena, when party discipline prevails over the cohesion of regional representation. Keywords: Federalism; Bicameralism; Senate; Institutional change; Brazil. well-established proposition in the institutional literature argues that federal Astates tend to take a slow reform path. Among other typical federal institutions, the second legislative body (the Senate) common to federal systems (Lijphart 1999; Stepan * The Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa no Estado
    [Show full text]
  • Campus Faes Argentina 2012*
    CAMPUS FAES ARGENTINA 2012* “PROPUESTAS PARA EL FUTURO” 14, 15 y 16 de marzo. Legislatura de la Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires. Perú 160, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires Miércoles 14 de marzo, “Retos y Desafíos para el Futuro” 09.00/09.15: Acreditación y desayuno (Hall de Honor). 09.15/10.00: Apertura (Salón Dorado). Mauricio Macri (Jefe de Gobierno de la Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires). Gerardo Bongiovanni (Presidente de Fundación Libertad, Vocal Fundación Pensar). Francisco Cabrera (Ministro de Desarrollo Económico, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires; Presidente de la Fundación Pensar). Javier Zarzalejos (Secretario General de Faes). 10.00/11.30: Panel I: “La agenda política del futuro” (Salón Dorado). Guillermo Hirschfeld (Coordinador de Programas para Iberoamérica de Fundación FAES). Miguel Braun (Director Ejecutivo de Fundación Pensar). Fernado Straface (Director Ejecutivo, CIPPEC). Fernando de Andreis (Jefe de Bloque PRO de la Legislatura de la CABA - Moderador) 11.30/12.00: Coffee Break 12.00/13.30: Panel II: “Desafíos Económicos de América Latina” (Salón Dorado). Luciano Laspina (Economista Jefe, Banco Ciudad) Jorge Triaca (Diputado Nacional). Rogelio Frigerio (Presidente de la Comisión de Presupuesto y Hacienda de la Legislatura de la CABA). Guillermo Lousteau (Filósofo. Doctor en Derecho. Experto constitucionalista. Profesor. Florida International University - Moderador). 13.30/14.30: Almuerzo – Brunch en la Fundación Pensar, Piedras 383, Piso 9, CABA. Disertante invitado: Miguel del Sel, candidato a Gobernador de PRO en la Provincia de Santa Fe en las elecciones en 2011. 14.45/16.45: Conferencia Especial I: “La Gestión Municipal” (Salón Dorado) Jorge Macri (Intendente de Vicente Lopez).
    [Show full text]
  • Argentina: Rudderless
    1 110TH CONGRESS " ! S. PRT. 2d Session COMMITTEE PRINT 110–48 ARGENTINA: RUDDERLESS REPORT TO THE MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION SEPTEMBER 9, 2008 Printed for the use of the Committee on Foreign Relations Available via World Wide Web: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/congress/ index.html U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 44–239 PDF WASHINGTON : 2008 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Aug 31 2005 16:39 Sep 11, 2008 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5012 Sfmt 5012 H:\DOCS\44239.TXT sfrela2 PsN: MIKEB seneagle COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., DELAWARE, Chairman CHRISTOPHER J. DODD, Connecticut RICHARD G. LUGAR, Indiana JOHN F. KERRY, Massachusetts CHUCK HAGEL, Nebraska RUSSELL D. FEINGOLD, Wisconsin NORM COLEMAN, Minnesota BARBARA BOXER, California BOB CORKER, Tennessee BILL NELSON, Florida JOHN E. SUNUNU, New Hampshire BARACK OBAMA, Illinois GEORGE V. VOINOVICH, Ohio ROBERT MENENDEZ, New Jersey LISA MURKOWSKI, Alaska BENJAMIN L. CARDIN, Maryland JIM DEMINT, South Carolina ROBERT P. CASEY, JR., Pennsylvania JOHNNY ISAKSON, Georgia JIM WEBB, Virginia DAVID VITTER, Louisiana ANTONY J. BLINKEN, Staff Director KENNETH A. MYERS, JR., Republican Staff Director (II) VerDate Aug 31 2005 16:39 Sep 11, 2008 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 H:\DOCS\44239.TXT sfrela2 PsN: MIKEB CONTENTS Page Letter of Transmittal ............................................................................................... v Introduction .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Elections in Ecuador February 17 Presidential & Legislative Elections
    Elections in Ecuador February 17 Presidential & Legislative Elections Frequently Asked Questions The Americas International Foundation for Electoral Systems 1850 K Street, NW | Fifth Floor | Washington, D.C. 20006 | www.IFES.org February 13, 2013 Frequently Asked Questions Who will Ecuadorians elect in the 2013 elections? ...................................................................................... 1 When are elections in Ecuador? ................................................................................................................... 1 When did the electoral process begin? ........................................................................................................ 1 How is Ecuador organized politically? .......................................................................................................... 1 What are the main political parties? ............................................................................................................ 2 Who is running for president and vice president? ....................................................................................... 2 How is election administration structured in Ecuador? ............................................................................... 3 Who can vote in this election? ..................................................................................................................... 3 During what hours will polling stations be open? .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • De Cliënt in Beeld
    Reforming the Rules of the Game Fransje Molenaar Fransje oftheGame theRules Reforming DE CLIËNTINBEELD Party law, or the legal regulation of political parties, has be- come a prominent feature of established and newly transi- tioned party systems alike. In many countries, it has become virtually impossible to organize elections without one party or another turning to the courts with complaints of one of its competitors having transgressed a party law. At the same Reforming the Rules of the Game time, it should be recognized that some party laws are de- signed to have a much larger political impact than others. Th e development and reform of party law in Latin America It remains unknown why some countries adopt party laws that have substantial implications for party politics while other countries’ legislative eff orts are of a very limited scope. Th is dissertation explores why diff erent party laws appear as they do. It builds a theoretical framework of party law reform that departs from the Latin American experience with regulating political parties. Latin America is not necessarily known for its strong party systems or party organizations. Th is raises the important ques- tion of why Latin American politicians turn to party law, and to political parties more generally, to structure political life. Using these questions as a heuristic tool, the dissertation advances the argument that party law reforms provide politicians with access to crucial party organizational resources needed to win elections and to legislate eff ectively. Extending this argument, the dissertation identifi es threats to party organizational resources as an important force shaping adopted party law reforms.
    [Show full text]
  • Nombre Direccion Ciudad
    NOMBRE DIRECCION CIUDAD 001EPICENTRAL AV RAMOS MEJIA 1900 CABA 001EPICENTRAL AV RAMOS MEJIA 1900 CABA 001EPICENTRAL AV RAMOS MEJIA 1900 CABA 001EPICENTRAL AV RAMOS MEJIA 1900 CABA 001MUFLUVIALSUD AV PEDRO DE MENDOZA 330 CABA 013COLOADUANADECOLON PEYRET 114 COLON 013MUCOLON PEYRET 114 COLON 018 CARREFOUR ROSARIO CIRC E PRESBIRERO Y CENTR ROSARIO 018 CARREFOUR ROSARIO CIRVUNVALACION Y ALBERTI ROSARIO 02 ALFA MIGUEL CANE 4575 QUILMES 022 CARREFOUR MAR DEL PLA CONSTITUCION Y RUTA 2 MAR DEL PLATA 073MUEZEIZA AU RICCHIERI KM 33 500 SN EZEIZA 12 DE OCTUBRE AV ANDRES BARANDA 1746 QUILMES 135 MARKET LA RIOJA 25 DE MAYO 151 LA RIOJA 135 MARKET LA RIOJA 25 DE MAYO 151 LA RIOJA 1558 SOLUCIONES TECNOLOGI AV ROCA 1558 GRAL ROCA 166LA MATANZA SUR CIRCUNV 2 SECCION GTA SEC CIUDAD EVITA 167 MARKET JUJUY 1 BALCARCE 408 SAN SALVADOR DE JUJUY 18 DE MAYO SRL 25 DE MAYO 660 GRAL ROCA 18 DE MAYO SRL 25 DE MAYO 660 GRAL ROCA 180 CARREFOUR R GRANDE II PERU 76 RIO GRANDE 187 EXP ESCOBAR GELVEZ 530 ESCOBAR 206 MARKET BERUTI BERUTI 2951 CABA 2108 PLAZA OESTE PARKING J M DE ROSAS 658 MORON 2108 PLAZA OESTE PARKING J M DE ROSAS 658 MORON 219 CARREFOUR CABALLITO DONATO ALVAREZ 1351 CABA 21948421 URQUIZA 762 SALTA 21956545 PJE ESCUADRON DE LOS GAU SALTA 21961143 MITRE 399 SALTA 21965217 HIPOLITO YRIGOYEN 737 SALTA 21968433 URQUIZA 867 SALTA 220 ELECTRICIDAD ENTRE RIOS 397 ESQ BELGR TICINO 22111744 ESPANA 1033 SALTA 22113310 LEGUIZAMON 470 SALTA 22116355 CALLE DE LOS RIOS 0 SALTA 22129878 SAN MARTIN 420 JESUS MARIA 22135806 LORENZO BARCALA 672 CORDOBA 22135940 AV RICHIERI
    [Show full text]
  • Mat. Apellido Nombre Descripcion Direccion N° Localidad Partido Telefono 015495 Marina Miguel Alberto Alergologia Av. Mitre
    MAT. APELLIDO NOMBRE DESCRIPCION DIRECCION N° LOCALIDAD PARTIDO TELEFONO 015495 MARINA MIGUEL ALBERTO ALERGOLOGIA AV. MITRE 1027 AVELLANEDA AVELLANEDA 011-20563346 026069 HRSAK CARMEN ROSA ALERGOLOGIA LOMAS DE ZAMORA 420 WILDE AVELLANEDA 011-42068502 027285 RUGGIA ALBERTO DELFOR ALERGOLOGIA ALSINA 214 AVELLANEDA AVELLANEDA 011-46117576 029730 POUSSIF MARTA INES ALERGOLOGIA AVENIDA MITRE 476 AVELLANEDA AVELLANEDA 011-42220947 036475 BENSIGNOR HECTOR ALEJANDRO ALERGOLOGIA CASTELLI 170 AVELLANEDA AVELLANEDA 011-42220883 016631 ELOSEGUI LILIAN MABEL ALERGOLOGIA VIAMONTE 433 BAHIA BLANCA BAHIA BLANCA - 016128 CARRILLO SANCHEZ ALFREDO ALERGOLOGIA AV DARDO ROCHA 339 BERAZATEGUI BERAZATEGUI 011-42266048 016128 CARRILLO SANCHEZ ALFREDO ALERGOLOGIA AV DARDO ROCHA 339 BERAZATEGUI BERAZATEGUI 011-42610047 019354 SANTOS ADRIANA LETICIA ALERGOLOGIA 141 Y 14 4121 BERAZATEGUI BERAZATEGUI 011-42160507 028669 FERRARA NICOLAS ANGEL ALERGOLOGIA 143 1357 BERAZATEGUI BERAZATEGUI 011-42562429 029246 LOPEZ RAUL OSVALDO ALERGOLOGIA 13 4741 BERAZATEGUI BERAZATEGUI - 029246 LOPEZ RAUL OSVALDO ALERGOLOGIA 14 2622 BERAZATEGUI BERAZATEGUI - 017692 CHIACCHIO ADRIANA ISABEL ALERGOLOGIA 8 3419 BERISSO BERISSO 0221-4614171 112267 ALVAREZ ELDA MABEL ALERGOLOGIA 20 4690 BERISSO BERISSO 0221-4642815 220242 DE GENNARO MONICA SILVIA ALERGOLOGIA LIBERTAD 613 CANUELAS CANUELAS 02226-422980 227266 FEITO MIRTA ELISA ALERGOLOGIA AMEGHINO 642 CANUELAS CANUELAS 02226-432783 227266 FEITO MIRTA ELISA ALERGOLOGIA LIBERTAD 620 CANUELAS CANUELAS 02226-422980 227266 FEITO MIRTA ELISA ALERGOLOGIA
    [Show full text]