DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft EIA for MFF CAREC Corridor 2 (Mangystau Oblast Sections), Tranche 2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft EIA for MFF CAREC Corridor 2 (Mangystau Oblast Sections), Tranche 2 Environmental Impact Assessment P43439-KAZ July 2012 KAZ: CAREC Corridor 2 (Mangystau Oblast Section) Investment Program, Tranche 2 Prepared by Ministry of Transport and Communications for the Asian Development Bank Draft EIA for MFF CAREC Corridor 2 (Mangystau Oblast Sections), Tranche 2 List of Abbreviations ADB Asian Development Bank Akimat Town Mayor Office AMP Asphalt Mixing Plant CAREC Central Asia Regional Economic Cooperation Program CEAP Construction Environmental Action Plan Ch km Chainage kilometer CL Center Line (of carriageway) CFH MOA’s Committee for Forestry and Hunting CR MOTC’s Roads Committee dBA decibel DOE Department of Environment (Oblast level) EA Executing Agency EARF Environmental Assessment and Review Framework EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EMP Environmental Management Plan ES Executive Summary FS Feasibility Study GoK Government of Kazakhstan IFI International Financing Institution IEE Initial Environmental Examination KAZNIIPIDORTRANS (DORTRANS) Design Consultant KSRNP Kyzylsai State Regional Nature Park KKSGR Karagie-Karakol State Game Reserve km Kilometer (mostly referred to as Chainage km) LARP Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan MFF Multi-tranche Financing Facility MOEP Ministry of Environmental Protection MOH Ministry of Health MOTC Ministry of Transport and Communication NGO Non-Governmental Organization Oblast Province OM Operational Manual (of ADB) PC Public Consultation PEIA Preliminary EIA (of DORTRANS, 2010) PMU Project Managing Unit PPTA Project Preparatory Technical Assistance (Concept Paper) Rayon District RE Resident Engineer RoW Right of Way SES Sanitary and Epidemiological Services of MOH STD Sexually transmitted diseases (such as HIV/AIDS) ToR Terms of Reference WB World Bank Currency Exchange Rates as of 27 July 2012: 1 US$ = 149.89 KZT (Kazakhstan Tenge) ($ refers in this report to US-Dollars) 2 | Page Draft EIA for MFF CAREC Corridor 2 (Mangystau Oblast Sections), Tranche 2 Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................. 7 A. Introduction and the Background .................................................................... 7 B. Critical Facts ................................................................................................... 7 C. Significant Findings ......................................................................................... 8 D. Recommended Actions ................................................................................... 9 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................... 12 A. Objective and Background of the EIA ........................................................... 12 Background ......................................................................................................... 12 Objective ............................................................................................................. 12 Proponent ............................................................................................................ 12 Programmatic Context of the Proposed Actions ................................................. 12 B. Nature, Location and Size of the Project ...................................................... 13 Nature of the Project ........................................................................................... 13 Location of the Project ........................................................................................ 13 C. Scope of the EIA ........................................................................................... 14 D. Baseline of the EIA ....................................................................................... 15 E. Structure and Contents of the EIA ................................................................ 15 F. Acknowledgement ............................................................................................ 16 2. Description of Project .......................................................................................... 17 A. Need and Justification for the Project, and Expected Benefits ..................... 17 B. Legal and Administrative Framework, Required Approvals ......................... 19 C. Analysis of Alternatives ................................................................................. 21 D. Identification of the Project and Project Components .................................. 23 E. Project Type .................................................................................................. 24 F. Environmental Category of the Project ............................................................ 24 G. Scope of Civil Works, and Materials Required ............................................. 25 H. Anticipated Schedule of Implementation and Life Span ............................... 27 I. Project Layout and Work Components ............................................................ 28 3. Description of the Environment ........................................................................... 30 A. Physical Environment ................................................................................... 30 Climate ................................................................................................................ 30 Air Quality and Noise .......................................................................................... 30 Topography, Geology and Soils ......................................................................... 31 Seismicity ............................................................................................................ 33 3 | Page Draft EIA for MFF CAREC Corridor 2 (Mangystau Oblast Sections), Tranche 2 Surface Waters ................................................................................................... 33 Ground Water - Quantity and Quality ................................................................. 33 B. Biological Resources .................................................................................... 36 Ecological Zones, and Characteristic Vegetation ............................................... 36 Fauna and Flora, Rare and Endangered Species in the Project Area ............... 37 Sensitive Habitats and Protected Areas ............................................................. 38 C. Human and Social Environment ................................................................... 39 Demography and Settlements ............................................................................ 39 Ethnic and Religious Groups .............................................................................. 39 Quality of Life Values .......................................................................................... 40 Public Health Conditions and Common Diseases .............................................. 40 Gender Issues ..................................................................................................... 40 Land-uses and Agricultural Activities .................................................................. 41 D. Infrastructure, Economic Activities and Public Facilities .............................. 42 Markets and Economically Active Sections of Population .................................. 42 Housing Development and Communication Facilities ........................................ 42 Water Supply, Sewerage, Waste Facilities ......................................................... 42 Education Facilities ............................................................................................. 43 E. Industrial Development and Transport Facilities .......................................... 43 Oil and Mineral Resources .................................................................................. 43 Development Plans, particularly those targeting the Transport Sector .............. 44 Other Transport Facilities .................................................................................... 44 F. Historical and Cultural Assets .......................................................................... 45 Archaeological and Historical Heritage ............................................................... 45 Cultural Events and Recreational Facilities ........................................................ 45 4. Analysis of Potential Impacts and Mitigation Measures ..................................... 46 A. Preliminary Environmental Screening Results ............................................. 46 B. Issues being addressed during the Pre-Construction Phase ....................... 46 Visual and Topographic Changes in the Landscape .......................................... 46 Inclusion of Safety Features into the Road Design ............................................ 46 Road Safety Issues associated with Pedestrian Crossings ............................... 47 Addressing Potential Impacts on Local Livestock and Wildlife Crossing the Road ............................................................................................................................ 47 Potential Impacts due to Removal of Roadside Vegetation ............................... 48 Potential Impacts due to Site Selection of Work Camps and Facilities .............. 48 4 | Page Draft EIA for MFF CAREC Corridor 2 (Mangystau Oblast Sections), Tranche 2 Sourcing of Water, and Potential Impacts on Local Water Resources .............. 49 Sourcing of Materials, Selection of Borrow Pits .................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Short Report on the Results Conducted During the Expedition to the Kazakh Part of the South Ustyurt and the Kaplankyr Chink in April and Mai 2018
    The short report on the results conducted during the expedition to the Kazakh part of the South Ustyurt and the Kaplankyr Chink in April and Mai 2018. In the period of 26 April to 5 Mai, in a framework of the CADI project (Central Asian Desert Initiative), a second comprehensive expedition to the southern part of the Ustyurt Plateau in Kazakhstan took place. In the expedition participated: Mark Pestov (herpetologist, Russia), Alexey Laktionov (botanist, Russia), Zhaskairat Nurmukhambetov (ornithologist, Kazakhstan), Vladimir Terentjev (environmental scientist, Kazakhstan), Orunbek Mukhanov (driver, Kazakhstan) and Rustam Karabalaev (driver, Kazakhstan). During the expedition, a group of researchers got a permission from the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the Border Guard Service of the Republic of Kazakhstan to enter a territory lying close to the state border among Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan to research the Kaplankyr Chink area. The border guards at the Ustyrt border post shared with a group of researchers a delicious meal in their soldiers' canteen and reported about encountering with a honey badger (lat. Mellivora capensis). A border guard team reported additionally about a placement of 8-row barrier barbed-wire fence on the border, which represents an insurmountable barrier for wild ungulates. In addition, it was reported about an area with a deep sinkhole and overhanging vertical sides, which was unknown for researchers earlier. One of the most significant results of the expedition was a proof of an occurrence of the Ustyurt urial (lat. Ovis orientalis vignei) habitat and a large group of goitered gazelle (lat. Gazella subgutturosa) in Southern Ustyurt, which is a crucial biotope for these populations and therefore should be granted a protected area status.
    [Show full text]
  • 43439-033: CAREC Corridor 2 (Mangystau Oblast Sections
    Social Monitoring Report Project Number: 43439-033 July 2020 KAZ: CAREC Corridor 2 (Mangystau Oblast Section) Investment Program – Tranche 2 Prepared by the "SNS-2017" LLP for the Ministry of Industry and Infrastructure Development, Republic of Kazakhstan and the Asian Development Bank. This bi-annual social monitoring report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section on ADB’s website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status or any territory or area. 5th BIANNUAL REPORT ON SOCIAL SAFEGUARD MEASURES Internal Monitoring Loan: 2967-KAZ Project of reconstruction of the highway "Zhetybay–Zhanaozen– Kenderli–Turkmenistan Border" (to Turkmenbashy) section km 0–73 Report on Social Safeguard Measures. Internal Monitoring. Project of Reconstruction of the highway "Zhetybay–Zhanaozen–Kenderli–Turkmenistan Border" (to Turkmenbashy) section km 0–73. 5th Bi-annual Report. Prepared by: Consultant for Supervision Construction "SNS-2017" LLP (Kazakhstan) For: - Committee for Roads, Ministry of Industry and Infrastructure Development of RK - Asian Development Bank; - Project Management Consultant: “Renardet S.A.” Report period: January-June 2020 1 Report on Social Safeguard Measures. Internal Monitoring. Project of Reconstruction of the highway "Zhetybay–Zhanaozen–Kenderli–Turkmenistan Border" (to Turkmenbashy) section km 0–73.
    [Show full text]
  • Progress Report on the Implementation of the Grant ECE/GC/2017/11/025 “Improved Understanding of Key Water Management Issues by Mid-Level Government Officials”
    Progress Report on the implementation of the grant ECE/GC/2017/11/025 “Improved understanding of key water management issues by mid-level government officials” . Kazakh-German University 1 January – 31th of July, 2018 1 part (Aktau training) Narrative report prepared by the German-Kazakh University 1. BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT Within the framework of the project 025 “Improved understanding of key water management issues by mid-level government officials”, German-Kazakh University was responsible to implement the following tasks under the grant ECE/GC/2017/11/025: • Organization of training for civil servants on Integrated Water Resources Management in collaboration with the State Academy of Management under the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan (State Academy) Aktau, Kazakhstan – April 9 – 11/2018 • Organization of training for civil servants on Integrated Water Resources Management in collaboration with the State Academy of Management under the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan (State Academy) Almaty, Kazakhstan – May 28 – 30/2018 Below is the description of activities implemented under each of the above tasks. Task I: Organization of IWRM training for civil servants in Aktau Based on the previous grant ECE/GC/2017.07.013 the second training for government officials was organized in Mangystay region (Aktau city) in order to cover water professionals from the Southwest region of the Republic of Kazakhstan. The training was organized by the Kazakh-German University with the support of the UNECE and in partnership with the RK State Academy Mangystay branch. The training was organized for 30 participants including trainers and organizational staff. The target audience of the training was the mid-level government staff.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Asia
    #1 Central Asia Snow leopard. All three big cats in the region – Persian leopard, Asiatic cheetah and snow leopard – are threatened by illegal hunting. Hunting of the cats' natural prey also causes starvation and increases the likelihood of attacks on domestic animals. 14 | | 15 Contents #1 3 _ Ongoing conservation efforts 54 List of figures 18 List of tables 18 3.1 Government 56 List of boxes 18 3.1.1 Institutions for conservation 56 List of abbreviations and acronyms 18 3.1.2 Protected areas 59 3.1.3 Transboundary initiatives 60 3.1.4 Wildlife law enforcement 62 3.1.5 National and local policies 63 0 _ Executive summary 20 3.1.6 International agreements 66 3.2 Community-based conservation 67 3.3 Civil society 67 1 _ Background 24 3.3.1 CSOs in Central Asia 67 3.3.2 CSO/NGO approaches and projects 68 1.1 Socio-economic setting 26 3.4 Private sector 72 1.1.1 Political and administrative context 26 3.5 International agencies and donors 73 1.1.2 Population and livelihoods 27 1.1.3 Economy 29 1.1.4 Resource ownership and governance 30 1.2 Key biodiversity features 31 4 _ Lessons learned 78 1.2.1 Geography and climate 31 4.1 Protected areas 80 1.2.2 Habitats and ecosystems 32 4.2 Landscape approaches to conservation 81 1.2.3 Species diversity, endemicity and extinction risk 35 4.3 Transboundary initiatives 82 1.2.4 Geographic priorities for conservation 36 4.4 Wildlife crime 82 4.5 Trophy and market hunting 84 4.6 Civil society organisations 85 2 _ Conservation challenges 40 4.7 Biodiversity conservation research 85 4.8 Private sector 85
    [Show full text]
  • Jusan Operation Sets Example for Other Countries, Says UN Official Lutsenko Wins Gold in Individual, Group Races at Cycling
    +1° / +1°C WEDNESDAY, JULY 10, 2019 No 13 (175) www.astanatimes.com Nur-Sultan hosts capital day celebrations, EU announces raises money for Arys assistance new programmes in Central Asia tral Asia relations as the new EU By Elya Altynsarina strategy takes effect, and it calls for ensuring the integrity, visu- NUR-SULTAN – The European alisation and visual perception of Union’s political commitment and EU-CA cooperation,” said Foreign a set of European Union-funded Minister of Kazakhstan Beibut regional programmes were an- Atamkulov at the 15th EU-Central nounced during a recent high- Asia Ministerial on July 7. level meeting in Bishkek between He said he was pleased Kazakh- Central Asian ministers of foreign stan’s proposals on women entre- affairs and Representative for For- preneurship, small- and medium- eign Affairs and Security Policy/ sized businesses, transport and Vice-President of the European logistics infrastructure, energy Commission Federica Mogherini. efficiency, environmental protec- The announcement marks the offi- tion, combating climate change, cial start of the implementation of and rational use of water resourc- the European Union’s new Strat- es, education and digitisation were egy on Central Asia. reflected in the document. In addition to the existing $1.12 Earlier in its statement, the Ka- billion bilateral and regional as- zakh Ministry of Foreign Affairs sistance for the period 2014-2020, welcomed the decision by the programmes within those worth European Council to adopt the $80.7 billion, the amount available strategy and noted that Kazakh- for the overall international devel- stan equally shares the conceptual opment assistance by the EU to the foundations of the document where world, will also benefit sustainable “sustainability” and “prosperity” development, economic empower- are given a special importance.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Economic Zone «Seaport Aktau »
    SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONE «SEAPORT AKTAU » THE AREA OF YOUR SUCCESS SEZ Advantageous geographical location SEAPORT AKTAU RUSSIAN FEDERATION Type of government Presidental Republic BELARUS Head of State KAZAKHSTANI MONGOLIA President Nazarbayev N.A. Population TURKEY China 18.376 million people IRAN Total area PAKISTAN 2,724,900 sq km. INDIA Capital: Astana Official languages kazakh, russian Why Kazakhstan? A business Bridge between Europe and Asia Availability of rich natural resources and minerals Single customs area with Russian Federation, the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Armenia and the Kyrgyz Republic The protection of investors' rights are ensured by political, economic and social stability in the country. Mangystau region SEZ SEAPORT AKTAU Located in the south-western part of Kazakhstan, on the east cost of Caspian sea. One of the leading regions of Kazakhstan, that makes a significant contribution to the socio-economic development and modernization of the country. ATYRAU REGION Opornyy Karazhanbas Kalamkas AKTOBE REGION Turush Bautino. Tushikudyk Kyzan Beyneu FORT-SHEVCHENKO Akzhigit Tigen Taushyq Shetpe Sai-Utes Mangystau (Mangyshlak) AKTAU (Shevchenko) Ushtagan Omirzak Zhetybay Munaishy Kyzylsai (Uzen) Zhanaozen REPUBLIC UZBEKISTAN Kuryk (Eraliev) Tenge Senek 1 Beineu district 2 Tupkaragan district Mangystau district Caspian Aksu 3 4 Karakiya district sea 4 Regional center 4 District center 4 City, village REPUBLIC 4 Railway TURKMENISTAN 5 Highway 4 Villages TRANSPORT AND LOGISTICS POTENTIAL SEZ OF THE REGION SEAPORT
    [Show full text]
  • Expanding the Opportunities of the Mangystau Region in Achieving
    Expanding the opportunities of the Mangystau region in achieving sustainable development and socio-economic modernization MPTF OFFICE ANNUAL PROGRAMME NARRATIVE PROGRESS REPORT REPORTING PERIOD: 1 JANUARY – 31 DECEMBER 2015 Country, Locality(s), Priority Area(s) / Strategic Programme Title & Project Number Results • Programme Title: “Expanding the opportunities Kazakhstan, Mangystau region of the Mangystau region in achieving sustainable Priority area/ strategic results development and socio-economic • Reduction of inequities and disparities in social modernization” well-being for the vulnerable populations, • Programme Number: increase of employment, improving key health • MPTF Office Project Reference Number: indicators • Enhancement of the capacities of local government to plan for diversified and balanced local economic growth and expansion of income generation opportunities and local self- governance development • Formation and use of sustainable development practices in response to the current problems caused by climate change, natural and man-made aspects of development Participating Organization(s) Implementing Partners UNDP, UNESCO, UNFPA, UNHCR, UNICEF, • The Ministry of National Economy of the UN Women, and WHO Republic of Kazakhstan and the Akimat of Mangystau Region Programme/Project Cost (US$) Programme Duration Total approved budget as per project document: Overall Duration $8,259,333 30 months JP Contribution Agency Contribution: UNDP ($700,000); UNICEF ($306,500); WHO Start Date ($250,000); UNHCR ($90,000); UNFPA ($70,000);
    [Show full text]
  • Book Water 1A
    ATLAS OF WATER MINING DEVICES IN THE ARID ZONES OF KAZAKHSTAN (HISTORICAL EVOLUTION OF WATER USE IN THE MIDDLE DESERTS) ЛАБОРАТОРИЯ ГЕОАРХЕОЛОГИИ Алматы On the cover, above: Map of the belt-zonal division of the territory of Kazakhstan (Yevstifeev Yu.G., Rachkovskaya E.I., Sadvokasov R.E.) where 6 arid zones explored in this book are highlighted in yellow. Below: left: at a well in the South-Western Balkhash on the border of the Taukum desert (Rumyantsev, 1913) right: beginning of a karez line trapping groundwater between 2 dried aquifers of the Sauran district, Turkestan oasis (aerial photo by R. Sala 2003) AL-FARABI KAZAKH NATIONAL UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF HISTORY, ARCHAEOLOGY AND ETHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL LABORATORY "GEOARCHEOLOGY" R. SALA , J.-M. DEOM ATLAS OF WATER MINING DEVICES IN THE ARID ZONE OF KAZAKHSTAN (HISTORICAL EVOLUTION OF WATER USE IN THE MIDDLE DESERTS) Almaty Kazakh University 2020 УДК 55:902 C 16 Recommended to the Academic Council of the Faculty of History, Archeology and Ethnology. Minutes No. 2, dated September 25, 2020. Printed according to the project - “Traditional methods of water supply in arid zones of Kazakhstan: ethnological and geoarcheological approaches” Sala R., Deom J.-M. C 16 Atlas of water mining devices in the arid zone of Kazakhstan (Historical evolution of water use in the Middle deserts).Monographs. Almaty: Kazakh University, 2020. ISBN 978-601-04-4813-1 The research will be inclusive of field and cameral works and laboratory analyses: reading all available information about past and present, relict and active water collection devices; documenting their surface or buried structure and all the elements of the material culture associated with their activity; studying the hydrogeological, environmental and archaeological context; gathering ethnological data through local documents and interviews.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecotourism in Mangystau. a Survey of the European Consumer
    MARION DONHOFF WORKING PAPER 2019/20 Ecotourism in Mangystau. A survey of the European consumer IrinaApril 2020 Grigoryeva Ecotourism in Mangystau. A survey of the European consumer Imprint Succow Foundation partner in the Greifswald Mire Centre Ellernholzstrasse 1/3 D-17489 Greifswald Germany [email protected] http://www.succow-stiftung.de http://www.greifswaldmoor.de Cite as: Grigoryeva, I., 2020, Ecotourism in Mangystau. A survey of the European consumer, Marion Dönhoff Fellowship Working Paper, Michael Succow Foundation partner in the Greifswald mire Centre (self-published URL: https://www.succow- stiftung.de/fileadmin/Ablage/Projekte/Forschung_Weiterbildung/Grigoryeva_Irina_MD .pdf), "Disclaimer: This work had been carried out within a fellowship programme funded by Marion Dönhoff Foundation, implemented and supervised by Michael Succow Foundation The authors are fully responsible for the content of this working paper Marion Dönhoff Foundation has no liability." 2 Ecotourism in Mangystau. A survey of the European consumer About Irina Grigoryeva is a biologist (M.Sc.) from Kazakhstan. Her master's thesis dealt with the steppe marmot and its population in the Akmola and Karaganda areas in Kazakhstan. Her research was conducted using satellite images. Since her study, she works for the NGO Association of Conservation of Biodiversity of Kazakhstan (ACBK). During her Dönhoff Fellowship, she is focused on the development of ecotourism concepts in the Ustyurt Nature Reserve (IUCN Ia) and places around this reserve in Kazakhstan. Before coming to Greifswald, she already conducted investigations and discussions in the target area, on the basis of which she is now developing recommendations for tourist routes, other tourist infrastructure and information and communication materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Striking Oil, Striking Workers Violations of Labor Rights in Kazakhstan’S Oil Sector WATCH
    HUMAN RIGHTS Striking Oil, Striking Workers Violations of Labor Rights in Kazakhstan’s Oil Sector WATCH Striking Oil, Striking Workers Violations of Labor Rights in Kazakhstan’s Oil Sector Copyright © 2012 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-937-2 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch is dedicated to protecting the human rights of people around the world. We stand with victims and activists to prevent discrimination, to uphold political freedom, to protect people from inhumane conduct in wartime, and to bring offenders to justice. We investigate and expose human rights violations and hold abusers accountable. We challenge governments and those who hold power to end abusive practices and respect international human rights law. We enlist the public and the international community to support the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org SEPTEMBER 2012 ISBN: 1-56432-937-2 Striking Oil, Striking Workers Violations of Labor Rights in Kazakhstan’s Oil Sector Summary ........................................................................................................................................... 1 Ersai Caspian Contractor
    [Show full text]
  • Deposits of the Hydrocarbon Raw Materials of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Where It Is Possible to Introduce a Microbiological Method for Stimulating the Formation
    E3S Web of Conferences 280, 01002 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202128001002 ICSF 2021 Deposits of the hydrocarbon raw materials of the Republic of Kazakhstan, where it is possible to introduce a microbiological method for stimulating the formation Olga Kuderinova1,*, Makhambet Shmanov1, and Mykhailo Filatiev2 1Karaganda Technical University, Development of Mineral Deposits Department, 56 N. Nazarbayev Str., 100027, Karaganda, Republic of Kazakhstan 2Volodymyr Dahl East Ukrainian National University, 59a Central Ave., Severodonetsk, 93406, Ukraine Abstract. The article is devoted to the analysis and systematization of data on hydrocarbon deposits in the Republic of Kazakhstan, highlighting those aspects that will allow the use of this method. The microbiological method of exposure refers to the chemical methods of the tertiary stage of development of oil reservoirs. It has already proven its effectiveness in highly depleted, waterflooded formations with irregular, diffuse oil saturation. Its main advantages are its relative cheapness, it does not require additional equipment during injecting of the microorganisms into the reservoir, and for their nutrition, as a rule, food industry waste is used, and its implementation cannot cause harmful effects on the environment. Also, a fairly extensive database was compiled, according to which various classifications of the republic's deposits were created. 1 Introduction removed, plus gases that can be extremely hazardous to health will be released. And chemical solutions can The purpose of the study was to identify the parameters permanently poison underground waters, which will needed for the introduction of the method of entail the death of all flora on the surface. microbiological influence on oil reservoirs, justification of the need for its use, as well as collection, analysis and systematization of data on all known this type deposits of 2 About the method of the the republic.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Development Report 2019
    SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 2019 STRIVING FOR PROGRESS CONTENTS | 2 Report Overview | 4 KMG Group Key Performance Indicators | 16 Message of the Chairman of the Board of Directors | 18 Message of the Chairman of the Management Board 20 34 48 56 88 102 Company Overview Sustainability Economic Environmental Social Appendices Management Performance Responsibility and Safety at the Workplace Responsibility Company’s Mission Sustainability Integration Generated and Distributed Our Approach to the Management Employment Appendix 1 and Strategic Intents | 34 Economic Value | 56 | 88 Reporting Limits, Changes, Notes | 24 | 49 | 102 Ethics and Integrity Workplace Safety Equal Opportunities Corporate Governance | 37 Implementation of Investment | 58 and Our Market Presence Appendix 2 | 25 Projects | 93 Environmental Indicators Mechanisms for Seeking Advice | 50 Occupational Health | 105 Key Corporate Events in 2019 on Unethical Conduct and Workplace Hygiene Observance of Human Rights | 31 | 37 Procurement Practices | 61 and Social Assistance Appendix 3 | 52 | 94 GRI Content Index Digital Transformation Stakeholder Engagement Industrial Safety | 108 | 32 | 39 Anti-Corruption Management | 62 Staff Development | 54 | 97 Appendix 4 Identification of Material Topics Environmental Performance Abbreviations and Acronyms of the Report | 64 Our Communities | 117 | 41 | 99 Transition to Low Carbon Contact details Initiatives and Memberships Development | 118 | 44 | 79 Compliance with Requirements | 85 HSE training | 86 1 Report Company Sustainability Economic Environmental Liability Social Appendices Overview Overview Management Performance and Workplace Safety Responsibility Sustainability report 2019 United Nations REPORT OVERVIEW Global Compact GRI 102-1, 102-32, 102-46, 102-50, 102-52, 102-54 Businesses should support and respect the protection of the internationally Principle 1 proclaimed human rights.
    [Show full text]