DOCSLIB.ORG

Louisiana Pearlshell Conservation Environmental Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Louisiana Pearlshell Conservation Environmental Assessment United States Department of Agriculture Louisiana Pearlshell Conservation Environmental Assessment Forest Service Kisatchie National Forest March 2020 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, sex, religious creed, disability, age, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g. Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.), should contact the Agency (State or local) where they applied for benefits. Individuals who are deaf, hard of hearing or have speech disabilities may contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program complaint of discrimination, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, (AD-3027) found online at: How to File a Complaint, and at any USDA office, or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights 1400 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; (2) fax: (202) 690-7442; or (3) email: [email protected]. This institution is an equal opportunity provider. 1 Table of Contents Introduction ......................................................................................................................................3 Proposed Project Location ........................................................................................................................ 3 Background ............................................................................................................................................... 3 Purpose and Need for Action ..............................................................................................................8 Proposed Action and No Action Alternative ........................................................................................8 Proposed Action ........................................................................................................................................ 8 No Action .................................................................................................................................................. 9 Comparison of Alternatives ...................................................................................................................... 9 Environmental Impacts ......................................................................................................................9 Issues ......................................................................................................................................................... 9 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 10 Impacts .................................................................................................................................................... 10 Soil and Water .................................................................................................................................... 10 Fish and Aquatic Organisms ............................................................................................................... 11 Heritage .............................................................................................................................................. 18 Agencies and Persons Consulted....................................................................................................... 19 Interdisciplinary Team Members ............................................................................................................ 19 Federal, State, and Local Agencies .......................................................................................................... 19 Tribes ....................................................................................................................................................... 19 Others ..................................................................................................................................................... 19 Literature Cited ................................................................................................................................19 List of Tables Table 1. Comparison of Alternatives ............................................................................................................. 9 Table 2. Endangered Species Considered and Included/Excluded from Analysis. ..................................... 12 Table 3. Threatened Species Considered and Included/Excluded from Analysis. ...................................... 12 Table 4. Sensitive Species Considered and Included/Excluded from Analysis. .......................................... 13 Table 5. Conservation Species Considered and Included/Excluded from Analysis. ................................... 13 Table 6. Aquatic Management Indicator Species by Stream Habitat ......................................................... 16 List of Figures Figure 1. Proposed action watersheds, Catahoula Ranger District .............................................................. 4 Figure 2. Proposed action watersheds, Evangeline Unit of the Calcasieu Ranger District ........................... 5 Figure 3. Current and Historical Distribution of the Louisiana pearlshell mussel ........................................ 7 2 Introduction The Forest Service is proposing various management actions to enhance Louisiana pearlshell mussel (LPM), Margaritifera hembeli, habitat and populations. Planning of the project will occur in a manner which incorporates the strategic purposes of the Kisatchie National Forest’s 1999 Revised Land and Resource Management Plan (RLRMP) and the Louisiana Pearlshell Recovery Plan (LPRP). The primary purpose of this proposal is to maintain and/or improve LPM habitat and populations. The Forest Service has prepared this Environmental Assessment in compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and other relevant Federal and State laws and regulations. This project implements the KNF RLRMP and is subject to the predecisional objection process at 36 CFR 218 Subparts A and B, as published in the Federal Register on March 27, 2013. This Environmental Assessment discloses the direct, indirect, and cumulative environmental impacts that would result from the proposed action. Additional documentation, including more detailed analyses of project-area resources, may be found in the project planning record located at the Kisatchie National Forest Supervisor’s Office in Pineville, Louisiana. This EA tiers (40 CFR 1502.20) to the FEIS for the Kisatchie National Forest RLRMP. The Plan and FEIS are on-line at https://www.fs.usda.gov/detail/kisatchie/landmanagement/planning/?cid=STELPRDB5391441. Proposed Project Location Project work would occur on Forest Service lands within the sub-watersheds (12-digit 6th level) and township ranges where the LPM currently or historically occurred. The locations are as follows: Black Creek, Gray Creek, Bayou Rigollette-Walden Bayou, Hudson Creek sub- watersheds in T7N R2W & T6N R2W & T6N R1W of the Catahoula Ranger District (RD) and Bayou Cocodrie-Bayou Rapides, Kincaid Reservoir-Bayou Boeuf, Middle Bayou-Bayou Boeuf, Bayou Clear-Bayou Boeuf sub-watersheds in T4N R3W & T3N R3W & T3N R2W & T2N R3W & T2N R2W & T2N R1W of the Evangeline Unit of the Calcasieu RD (Figures 1 and 2). Background The Louisiana pearlshell mussel is a federally threatened species of bivalve mollusk in the family Margaritiferidae and is endemic to central Louisiana. Existing populations are known from headwater streams in Rapides and Grant Parishes. The mussel was first classified as endangered on February 5, 1988, under the Endangered Species Act (Act). At the time of listing, the LPM was thought to be restricted to 11 streams in the Bayou Boeuf and Bayou Rapides drainages of Rapides Parish, Louisiana. After the initial listing, the mussel was discovered in the Bayou Rigolette drainage of Grant Parish, Louisiana, in 1991. The LPM is currently distributed across four management watersheds: Bayou Rapides and Bayou Boeuf south of the Red River in Rapides Parish and Black Creek and Bayou Rigolette north of the Red River in Grant Parish (Figure 3). Occupied streams are found in drainage areas that cross both privately owned and publicly owned lands in both parishes. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) reclassified the mussel from endangered to threatened on September 24, 1993 (USFWS 2017). Currently, there is a Revised Recovery Plan for Louisiana Pearlshell (USFWS 2019) that contains a recovery strategy. The recovery strategy is to eliminate or 3 Figure 1. Proposed action watersheds, Catahoula Ranger District 4 Figure 2. Proposed action watersheds, Evangeline Unit of the Calcasieu Ranger District 5 minimize threats in order to promote
Load more

Recommended publications
  • United States National Museum Bulletin 282
    Cl>lAat;i<,<:>';i^;}Oit3Cl <a f^.S^ iVi^ 5' i ''*«0£Mi»«33'**^ SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION MUSEUM O F NATURAL HISTORY I NotUTus albater, new species, a female paratype, 63 mm. in standard length; UMMZ 102781, Missouri. (Courtesy Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan.) UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM BULLETIN 282 A Revision of the Catfish Genus Noturus Rafinesque^ With an Analysis of Higher Groups in the Ictaluridae WILLIAM RALPH TAYLOR Associate Curator, Division of Fishes SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION PRESS CITY OF WASHINGTON 1969 IV Publications of the United States National Museum The scientific publications of the United States National Museum include two series, Proceedings of the United States National Museum and United States National Museum Bulletin. In these series are published original articles and monographs dealing with the collections and work of the Museum and setting forth newly acquired facts in the fields of anthropology, biology, geology, history, and technology. Copies of each publication are distributed to libraries and scientific organizations and to specialists and others interested in the various subjects. The Proceedings, begun in 1878, are intended for the publication, in separate form, of shorter papers. These are gathered in volumes, octavo in size, with the publication date of each paper recorded in the table of contents of the volume. In the Bulletin series, the first of which was issued in 1875, appear longer, separate publications consisting of monographs (occasionally in several parts) and volumes in which are collected works on related subjects. Bulletins are either octavo or quarto in size, depending on the needs of the presentation. Since 1902, papers relating to the botanical collections of the Museum have been published in the Bulletin series under the heading Contributions from the United States National Herbarium.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Fish Report
    Aquatic Fish Report Acipenser fulvescens Lake St urgeon Class: Actinopterygii Order: Acipenseriformes Family: Acipenseridae Priority Score: 27 out of 100 Population Trend: Unknown Gobal Rank: G3G4 — Vulnerable (uncertain rank) State Rank: S2 — Imperiled in Arkansas Distribution Occurrence Records Ecoregions where the species occurs: Ozark Highlands Boston Mountains Ouachita Mountains Arkansas Valley South Central Plains Mississippi Alluvial Plain Mississippi Valley Loess Plains Acipenser fulvescens Lake Sturgeon 362 Aquatic Fish Report Ecobasins Mississippi River Alluvial Plain - Arkansas River Mississippi River Alluvial Plain - St. Francis River Mississippi River Alluvial Plain - White River Mississippi River Alluvial Plain (Lake Chicot) - Mississippi River Habitats Weight Natural Littoral: - Large Suitable Natural Pool: - Medium - Large Optimal Natural Shoal: - Medium - Large Obligate Problems Faced Threat: Biological alteration Source: Commercial harvest Threat: Biological alteration Source: Exotic species Threat: Biological alteration Source: Incidental take Threat: Habitat destruction Source: Channel alteration Threat: Hydrological alteration Source: Dam Data Gaps/Research Needs Continue to track incidental catches. Conservation Actions Importance Category Restore fish passage in dammed rivers. High Habitat Restoration/Improvement Restrict commercial harvest (Mississippi River High Population Management closed to harvest). Monitoring Strategies Monitor population distribution and abundance in large river faunal surveys in cooperation
    [Show full text]
  • Louisiana's Animal Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN)
    Louisiana's Animal Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN) ‐ Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Animals ‐ 2020 MOLLUSKS Common Name Scientific Name G‐Rank S‐Rank Federal Status State Status Mucket Actinonaias ligamentina G5 S1 Rayed Creekshell Anodontoides radiatus G3 S2 Western Fanshell Cyprogenia aberti G2G3Q SH Butterfly Ellipsaria lineolata G4G5 S1 Elephant‐ear Elliptio crassidens G5 S3 Spike Elliptio dilatata G5 S2S3 Texas Pigtoe Fusconaia askewi G2G3 S3 Ebonyshell Fusconaia ebena G4G5 S3 Round Pearlshell Glebula rotundata G4G5 S4 Pink Mucket Lampsilis abrupta G2 S1 Endangered Endangered Plain Pocketbook Lampsilis cardium G5 S1 Southern Pocketbook Lampsilis ornata G5 S3 Sandbank Pocketbook Lampsilis satura G2 S2 Fatmucket Lampsilis siliquoidea G5 S2 White Heelsplitter Lasmigona complanata G5 S1 Black Sandshell Ligumia recta G4G5 S1 Louisiana Pearlshell Margaritifera hembeli G1 S1 Threatened Threatened Southern Hickorynut Obovaria jacksoniana G2 S1S2 Hickorynut Obovaria olivaria G4 S1 Alabama Hickorynut Obovaria unicolor G3 S1 Mississippi Pigtoe Pleurobema beadleianum G3 S2 Louisiana Pigtoe Pleurobema riddellii G1G2 S1S2 Pyramid Pigtoe Pleurobema rubrum G2G3 S2 Texas Heelsplitter Potamilus amphichaenus G1G2 SH Fat Pocketbook Potamilus capax G2 S1 Endangered Endangered Inflated Heelsplitter Potamilus inflatus G1G2Q S1 Threatened Threatened Ouachita Kidneyshell Ptychobranchus occidentalis G3G4 S1 Rabbitsfoot Quadrula cylindrica G3G4 S1 Threatened Threatened Monkeyface Quadrula metanevra G4 S1 Southern Creekmussel Strophitus subvexus
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Arkansas Fishes Thomas M
    Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science Volume 27 Article 11 1973 Checklist of Arkansas Fishes Thomas M. Buchanan University of Arkansas – Fort Smith Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas Part of the Population Biology Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Buchanan, Thomas M. (1973) "Checklist of Arkansas Fishes," Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science: Vol. 27 , Article 11. Available at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas/vol27/iss1/11 This article is available for use under the Creative Commons license: Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0). Users are able to read, download, copy, print, distribute, search, link to the full texts of these articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 27 [1973], Art. 11 Checklist of Arkansas Fishes THOMAS M.BUCHANAN Department ot Natural Science, Westark Community College, Fort Smith, Arkansas 72901 ABSTRACT Arkansas has a large, diverse fish fauna consisting of 193 species known to have been collected from the state's waters. The checklist is an up-to-date listing of both native and introduced species, and is intended to correct some of the longstanding and more recent erroneous Arkansas records.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Inland Fishes of Louisiana
    Southeastern Fishes Council Proceedings Volume 1 Number 61 2021 Article 3 March 2021 Checklist of the Inland Fishes of Louisiana Michael H. Doosey University of New Orelans, [email protected] Henry L. Bart Jr. Tulane University, [email protected] Kyle R. Piller Southeastern Louisiana Univeristy, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/sfcproceedings Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, and the Biodiversity Commons Recommended Citation Doosey, Michael H.; Bart, Henry L. Jr.; and Piller, Kyle R. (2021) "Checklist of the Inland Fishes of Louisiana," Southeastern Fishes Council Proceedings: No. 61. Available at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/sfcproceedings/vol1/iss61/3 This Original Research Article is brought to you for free and open access by Volunteer, Open Access, Library Journals (VOL Journals), published in partnership with The University of Tennessee (UT) University Libraries. This article has been accepted for inclusion in Southeastern Fishes Council Proceedings by an authorized editor. For more information, please visit https://trace.tennessee.edu/sfcproceedings. Checklist of the Inland Fishes of Louisiana Abstract Since the publication of Freshwater Fishes of Louisiana (Douglas, 1974) and a revised checklist (Douglas and Jordan, 2002), much has changed regarding knowledge of inland fishes in the state. An updated reference on Louisiana’s inland and coastal fishes is long overdue. Inland waters of Louisiana are home to at least 224 species (165 primarily freshwater, 28 primarily marine, and 31 euryhaline or diadromous) in 45 families. This checklist is based on a compilation of fish collections records in Louisiana from 19 data providers in the Fishnet2 network (www.fishnet2.net).
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Fishes of Caddo and Bossier Parishes, Louisiana
    BULLETIN OF THE MUSEUM OF LIFE SCIENCES NUMBER 3 CHECKLIST OF THE FISHES OF CADDO AND BOSSIER PARISHES, LOUISIANA LAURENCE M. HARDY AND WILLIAM H. LEGRANDE SHREVEPORT LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY IN SHREVEPORT 1979 Numbers of the BULLETIN OF THE MUSEUM OF LIFE SCIENCES are published at irregular intervals. Articles concerning any aspect of the natural history, systematics, or ecology of the flora and fauna of the southeastern United States are acceptable. Laurence M. Hardy, Editor Communications concerning manuscripts, the purchase or exchange of any number of the BULLETIN, or any editorial matters should be addressed to the Editor, Museum of Life Sciences, Louisiana State University in Shreveport, 8515 Youree Drive, Shreveport, Louisiana 71115. Date of publication: October 1, 1979 Price for this issue 50¢ This public document was published at a cost of 47 cents per copy by Louisiana State Uni- versity in Shreveport to inform citizens of Louisiana under authority of the Louisiana State Constitution. This material was printed in accordance with the standards for printing by state agencies pursuant to R.S. 43:31. Printing of this material was purchased in accordance with the provisions of Title 43 of the Louisiana Revised Statutes. BULLETIN of the MUSEUM OF LIFE SCIENCES Number 3, Pages 1-12 October 1. 1979 CHECKLIST OF THE FISHES OF CADDO AND BOSSIER PARISHES, LOUISIANA LAURENCE M. HARDY Museum of Life Sciences Louisiana State University in Shreveport 8515 Youree Drive Shreveport, Louisiana 71115 WILLIAM H. LEGRANDE Department of Biology University of Wisconsin/Stevens Point Stevens Point, Wisconsin 54481 Copyright @ 1979 by Louisiana State University in Shreveport 1979 HARDY AND LEGRANDE: CHECKLIST OF FISHES 3 INTRODUCTION SOURCES OF INFORMATION Species are included in this list on the basis Bossier Parish or on published records in the of museum specimens (examined by one or both scientific literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Laboratory Operations Manual Version 2.0 May 2014
    United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water Washington, DC EPA 841‐B‐12‐010 National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013‐2014 Laboratory Operations Manual Version 2.0 May 2014 2013‐2014 National Rivers & Streams Assessment Laboratory Operations Manual Version 1.3, May 2014 Page ii of 224 NOTICE The intention of the National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013‐2014 is to provide a comprehensive “State of Flowing Waters” assessment for rivers and streams across the United States. The complete documentation of overall project management, design, methods, quality assurance, and standards is contained in five companion documents: National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013‐14: Quality Assurance Project Plan EPA‐841‐B‐12‐007 National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013‐14: Site Evaluation Guidelines EPA‐841‐B‐12‐008 National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013‐14: Non‐Wadeable Field Operations Manual EPA‐841‐B‐ 12‐009a National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013‐14: Wadeable Field Operations Manual EPA‐841‐B‐12‐ 009b National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013‐14: Laboratory Operations Manual EPA 841‐B‐12‐010 Addendum to the National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013‐14: Wadeable & Non‐Wadeable Field Operations Manuals This document (Laboratory Operations Manual) contains information on the methods for analyses of the samples to be collected during the project, quality assurance objectives, sample handling, and data reporting. These methods are based on the guidelines developed and followed in the Western Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (Peck et al. 2003). Methods described in this document are to be used specifically in work relating to the NRSA 2013‐2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Mussel Report M-Z
    Mussel Report M-Z Margaritifera hembeli Class: Bivalvia Order: Unionoida Family: Margaritiferidae Priority Score: 80 out of 100 Population Trend: Unknown G Rank: G1 — Critically imperiled species S Rank: SH — Historic record. Possibly extirpated in Arkansas. Distribution Ecoregions where the species occurs: Ozark Highlands Mississippi Valley Loess Plains Boston Mountains Mississippi Alluvial Plain Arkansas Valley South Central Plains Ouachita Mountains Element Occurrence Records Taxa Association Team and Peer Reviewers AGFC Mr. Bill Posey, USFWS-ES Mr. Chris Davidson, ASU Dr. Alan Christian, TNC Mr. Doug Zollner, AHTD Dr. John Harris, AHTD Mr. Josh Seagraves Margaritifera hembeli Page 966 Louisiana Pearlshell Mussel Report M-Z Ecobasins where the species occurs Substrate Description ? Shell oblong, obovate to subrhomboid, sometimes a little arcuate, subsolid to solid, inequilateral; beaks moderately full, their sculpture not seen; posterior ridge low, rounded or somewhat doubled; Shell brownish or blackish; left valve with two low, stumpy, rough pseudocardinals and two remote, feeble laterals; right valve with one pseudocardinal and behind it a vestige of a second with one lateral; nacre whitish or lurid purplish with numerous pits. Host Fish striped shiner, redfin shiner, golden shiner Ecobasins South Central Plains - Red River Habitats Weight Natural Run: Headwater Optimal Problems Faced Threat: Nutrient loading Source: Grazing Threat: Nutrient loading Source: Urban development Data Gaps/Research Needs Conduct distribution surveys. Determine habitat preferences. Determine problems faced and sources of problems faced. Margaritifera hembeli Page 967 Louisiana Pearlshell Mussel Report M-Z Conservation Actions Importance Category More data is needed to determine conservation actions. High Data Gap Monitoring Strategies Additional information is needed before a monitoring strategy can be developed.
    [Show full text]
  • Noturus Eleutherus)
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 12-2017 Aspects of the Physiological and Behavioral Defense Adaptations of the Mountain Madtom (Noturus eleutherus) Meredith Leigh Hayes University of Tennessee, Knoxville, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Behavior and Ethology Commons, and the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Hayes, Meredith Leigh, "Aspects of the Physiological and Behavioral Defense Adaptations of the Mountain Madtom (Noturus eleutherus). " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2017. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/4968 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Meredith Leigh Hayes entitled "Aspects of the Physiological and Behavioral Defense Adaptations of the Mountain Madtom (Noturus eleutherus)." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Wildlife and Fisheries Science. J. Brian Alford, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Gerald Dinkins, Jeffrey Becker, J. R. Shute Accepted for the Council: Dixie L. Thompson Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) Aspects of the Physiological and Behavioral Defense Adaptations of the Mountain Madtom (Noturus eleutherus) A Thesis Presented for the Master of Science Degree The University of Tennessee, Knoxville Meredith Leigh Hayes December 2017 ii Copyright ã by Meredith Hayes Harris All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 2.1 SGCN List
    Appendix 2.1 SGCN List List of species of greatest conservation need ranked by Species Priority Score. A higher score implies a greater need for conservation concern and actions. Priority Common Name Scientific Name Taxa Association Score 100 Curtis Pearlymussel Epioblasma florentina curtisii Mussel 100 Turgid Blossom Epioblasma turgidula Mussel 100 Yellowcheek Darter Etheostoma moorei Fish 80 Bowed Snowfly Allocapnia oribata Insect 80 Winter Stonefly Allocapnia warreni Insect 80 Foushee Cavesnail Amnicola cora Invertebrate - other 80 Ouachita Rock Pocketbook Arcidens wheeleri Mussel 80 Magazine Mountain Mold Beetle Arianops sandersoni Insect 80 Benton County Cave Crayfish Cambarus aculabrum Crayfish 80 Hell Creek Cave Crayfish Cambarus zophonastes Crayfish 80 Ozark Big-eared Bat Corynorhinus townsendii ingens Mammal 80 Slenderwrist Burrowing Crayfish Fallicambarus petilicarpus Crayfish 80 Sulphur Springs Diving Beetle Heterosternuta sulphuria Insect 80 Magazine Mountain Shagreen Inflectarius magazinensis Invertebrate - other 80 Magazine Stripetail Isoperla szczytkoi Insect 80 Speckled Pocketbook Lampsilis streckeri Mussel 80 Isopod Lirceus bidentatus Invertebrate - other 80 Ozark Pyrg Marstonia ozarkensis Invertebrate - other 80 Caddo Madtom Noturus taylori Fish 80 Striate Supercoil Paravitrea aulacogyra Invertebrate - other 80 Microcaddisfly Paucicalcaria ozarkensis Insect 80 Irons Fork Burrowing Crayfish Procambarus reimeri Crayfish 80 Winged Mapleleaf Quadrula fragosa Mussel 80 Ground Beetle Rhadine ozarkensis Insect 80 Ouachita Pebblesnail
    [Show full text]
  • Section 8. Appendices
    Section 8. Appendices Appendix 1.1 — Acronyms Terminology AWAP – Arkansas Wildlife Action Plan BMP – Best Management Practice CWCS — Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy EO — Element Occurrence GIS — Geographic Information Systems SGCN — Species of Greatest Conservation Need LIP — Landowner Incentive Program MOA — Memorandum of Agreement ACWCS — Arkansas Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy SWG — State Wildlife Grant LTA — Land Type Association WNS — White-nose Syndrome Organizations ADEQ — Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality AGFC — Arkansas Game and Fish Commission AHTD — Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department ANHC — Arkansas Natural Heritage Commission ASU — Arkansas State University ATU — Arkansas Technical University FWS — Fish and Wildlife Service HSU — Henderson State University NRCS — Natural Resources Conservation Service SAU — Southern Arkansas University TNC — The Nature Conservancy UA — University of Arkansas (Fayetteville) UA/Ft. Smith — University of Arkansas at Fort Smith UALR — University of Arkansas at Little Rock UAM — University of Arkansas at Monticello UCA — University of Central Arkansas USFS — United States Forest Service 1581 Appendix 2.1. List of Species of Greatest Conservation Need by Priority Score. List of species of greatest conservation need ranked by Species Priority Score. A higher score implies a greater need for conservation concern and actions. Priority Common Name Scientific Name Taxa Association Score 100 Curtis Pearlymussel Epioblasma florentina curtisii Mussel 100
    [Show full text]
  • Glenn Ray Parsons
    VITA GLENN RAY PARSONS Address (office): Department of Biology University of Mississippi University, MS 38677 Address (home): 467 Highway 7 North Oxford, MS 38677 Occupation: Professor, 2001 to present Associate Professor, 1993 to 2000 Assistant Professor, 1988 to 1992 Phone: Office (662) 915-7479, Home (662) 234-3901 E-mail: [email protected] Born: October 30, 1953; Fairfield, Alabama. Married: Cheryl K. Bouler; October 25, 1980. Degrees: Ph.D.; Marine Science/Biological Oceanography, University of South Florida, 1987. M.S.; Biology, University of South Alabama, Mobile, 1981. B.S.; Biology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, 1977. 1 2 (Total competitive grants to date excluding in-house awards: $1,724,000.00) (With the exception of four awards they were awarded to me as sole investigator) Present Research Grants United States Fish and Wildlife Service/Mississippi Departrment of Wildlife Fisheries and Parks, Sportfish Restoration Program. “Crappie movement in North Mississippi Reservoirs”. $160,000. Past Research Grants National Marine Fisheries Service, MARFIN Program. Swimming performance of red snapper: Its application to by-catch reduction, 2005 to 2008. $296,000. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service, MARFIN Program. Swimming performance of red snapper: Its application to by-catch reduction, 2001 to 2004. $230,000. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service; Review, Synthesis and Summarization of Existing Shark Nursery Grounds Information in Alabama and Mississippi Waters. 2000. $2000.00 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service; The identification and characterization of shark nursery grounds in the northern Gulf of Mexico. 1997-2000. $158,589.00 U.S.
    [Show full text]