DOCSLIB.ORG

Crime in Washington State 2010

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Crime in Washington State 2010 The Crime In Washington 2010 Annual Report is prepared by Criminal Justice Information Support Staff: Kellie Lapczynski, Statistical Compiler Linda Schaffel, NIBRS Specialist Tonya Todd, Document Imager Joan Smith, CJIS Manager The Washington State Uniform Crime Reporting Program is a cooperative effort of: W0B ashington Association of Washington State Criminal Sheriffs1B and Police Chiefs Justice Training Commission 3060 Willamette Drive NE 19010 1st Avenue South Lacey, WA 98516 Seattle, WA 98148 Phone: (360) 486-2380 Phone: (206) 835-7300 Fax:3B (360) 486-2381 Fax: (206) 439-3752 Website:2B www.waspc.orgH H Website: www.cjtc.state.wa.usH Donald G. Pierce, William J. Hawe, Executive4B Director Executive Director CRIME IN WASHINGTON STATE - 2010 SUMMARY RATE OF INDEX CRIME Index crimes in Washington State totaled 268,102 for 2010, constituting 39.8 offenses per 1,000 persons. This represents a decrease of 0.3% in the index crime rate (per 1,000 persons) from 2009. POPULATION **The estimated population in Washington for 2010 was 6,733,250 as compared to 6,668,200 for 2009. This represents a 0.98% increase. VIOLENT CRIME Violent crime offenses are murder, forcible rape, robbery, and aggravated assault. Reported violent crime offenses totaled 20,599 for 2010. The violent crime rate per 1,000 persons for 2010 is 3.06, which is a decrease of 7.0% compared to 2009. While simple assault can be violent, it is not generally serious in nature therefore is excluded from the categorization of violent crime for this publication. PROPERTY CRIME Property crime offenses are burglary, larceny, motor vehicle theft, and arson. Reported property crime offenses totaled 247,503 for 2010. The property crime rate per 1,000 persons for 2010 is 36.8, which is an increase of 0.3% compared to 2009. VALUE OF PROPERTY Property valued at $310,137,376 was reported stolen in 2010. Of this STOLEN AND RECOVERED amount, $92,075,527 or 29.7% was recovered. The value of property stolen shows an increase of 9.1% over 2009. NUMBER OF LAW One officer was killed accidently while in the line of duty. A total of 1,019 law ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS enforcement officers were assaulted during the year. Assaults on officers KILLED OR ASSAULTED increased 24.0% when compared to 2009 with 822 officer assaults reported for that year. RATE OF CRIME There was an 18.3% clearance rate for all index crimes reported in 2010. CLEARANCES The clearance rate for 2009 was 18.6%. ARRESTS A total of 226,624 arrests were reported in 2010 constituting a decrease of 7.3% from the year 2009. DRUG ABUSE ARRESTS There were 21,765 reported drug abuse arrests. Of this number, 13.2% were persons under 18 years of age. DUI ARRESTS A total of 34,594 arrests were made for DUI, which constituted 15.3% of the total arrests reported in 2010. The total represents the arrests of 34,202 adults and 392 juveniles. i LAW ENFORCEMENT In 2010, there were 14,545 full-time law enforcement employees in the State EMPLOYEES of Washington. Of these, there were 10,418 commissioned officers, which is a decrease of 1.4% from 2009. DOMESTIC VIOLENCE There were 49,270 domestic violence offenses including simple assault and violation of protection/no contact orders. This was an increase of 2.24% over 2009. A total of 244 law enforcement agencies participated in this data collection. HATE/BIAS CRIME There were 213 reported hate bias crime incidents by 265 participating law enforcement agencies. This represents an increase of .9% over 2009. Of the 213 incidents, there were 274 hate/bias offenses. It is important to remember that there can be more than one offense within a single incident. Of 265 reporting agencies, 206 reported that there was no hate crime activity in their jurisdiction. ** Source: Office of Financial Management, Forecasting Division Population Trends for Washington State (April 1, 2010) ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS CRIME IN WASHINGTON STATE 2010 was compiled from data submitted to the Washington Uniform Crime Reporting program and National Incident-Based Reporting System of the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs by Washington State Law Enforcement agencies during 2010. Coverage is 99.9% of the state population. This report would not be possible without the voluntary cooperation of Washington State’s law enforcement agencies and the commitment to submit timely, complete, and accurate crime statistics. iii Introduction This is the thirty-first annual report of criminal offenses, arrests, law enforcement officers killed or assaulted, and full-time law enforcement employees produced by the Washington Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program. Funding for the UCR Program is provided through contract with the Washington State Criminal Justice Training Commission (CJTC). Administration of the UCR Program is the responsibility of the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs (WASPC) Criminal Justice Information Support (CJIS) Department. Washington’s UCR Program is unique in that it is sponsored, administered, and supported by an organization of contributing agency administrators rather than a bureau or department of state government. Background Although the collection of nationwide crime information dates back to the 1890's, no ongoing program was initiated until the International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP) established a committee on uniform crime records in 1917. The committee's responsibility to provide management information to law enforcement agencies was eventually turned over to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in 1930 when the FBI received a congressional mandate to collect and disseminate national crime information. The IACP has continued to serve the UCR Program in an advisory capacity and has been joined in this responsibility by the National Sheriffs Association. Data for Crime in Washington State 2010 are compiled from monthly Summary UCR submissions by individual law enforcement agencies throughout the State of Washington. The UCR Program was activated in October 1979 and began the collection of monthly reports from contributing agencies in January 1980. Today, the UCR program offers on-line data input processing and provides various reports necessary for statistical purposes in the criminal justice system. Objectives of Washington UCR Segments of our population need more complete, accurate, and timely information for a variety of reasons. Citizens are interested in the probability of crime in their neighborhoods and criminal justice practitioners need to know what is occurring in order to deploy personnel and equipment more efficiently to support public safety. Legislators need statewide information about crime in order to pass realistic laws that will increase the stability of our society. Researchers and planners need to know what is actually happening to predict trends and recommend changes. The primary objectives of Crime in Washington State 2010 are to implement and administer a uniform system of collecting crime and arrest statistical data from contributing law enforcement agencies in the State of Washington and present the information needed by each of these groups. This information will not, in itself, prevent crime but it may encourage segments of society to understand the problem and to work together with law enforcement agencies to reduce crime. Additional objectives of Crime in Washington WASPC Crime in Washington 2010 1 State 2010 when compiled and evaluated are: 1. To identify the number of crimes reported by contributing agencies. 2. To identify the geographical distribution of reported offenses. 3. To determine whether or not reported crimes have increased or decreased. 4. To determine whether or not reported crimes have increased or decreased by population groups. 5. To determine the number of clearances and the clearance rate for reported offenses. 6. To determine the reported number of arrests by offense, age, sex, and race. 7. To determine the number of law enforcement officers assaulted and killed. 8. To determine the number of commissioned (sworn) and civilian law enforcement employees by gender. 9. To determine the rate per population group of commissioned (sworn) and civilian law enforcement employees. Crime Factors Factors relating to crime reporting practices, law enforcement policies, population characteristics, and interpretation all contribute to variation in reported data. Some general factors which may affect the amount of crime reported and type of crime committed are: 1. The density and size of the community population and of its surrounding area. 2. The variations in composition of the population, particularly to age. 3. The economic status, education, and recreation characteristics of the community population. 4. The stability of population with respect to residents' mobility, commuting patterns, and transient factors. 5. The climate, including seasonal weather conditions, and other geographical variations. 6. The religious characteristics of the population. 7. The effective strength of law enforcement agencies. 8. The policies of other components of the criminal justice system (i.e., prosecutorial, judicial, correctional and probational). 9. The attitude of the public toward law enforcement problems. 10. The crime reporting practices of the citizenry. 11. The administrative and investigative follow-up of the local law enforcement agency, including the degree of adherence to crime reporting standards. UCR Statistical Interpretation Statistics are a tool used to summarize information so that patterns or trends become clearer. All statistics must be interpreted with an understanding of what they represent. To draw appropriate conclusions, it is necessary to know what information is included and how it is reported. To obtain accurate information from many different agencies, the national UCR program has to define the precise methods for counting the number of offenses, arrests, clearances, and value of stolen or recovered property. The methods of counting and some resulting limitations are explained below. WASPC Crime in Washington 2010 2 Classification of Offenses Summary UCR divides offenses into two major classifications designated as Part I and Part II offenses and different information is collected for each classification.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Washington Infonet Statewide Data Report
    Washington InfoNet Statewide Data Report July 1, 2009 through June 30, 2010 Introduction 303, 567 hours of direct service were provided to victims of crime in Washington last year. That number tells a story, doesn’t it? July, 2010 marks the fourth anniversary of the InfoNet data collection system, designed by the Office of Crime Victims Advocacy in partnership with DSHS Children’s Administration to ease data collection, improve the quality and quantity of victim service data available in Washington State, and provide an integrated means of data collection for victim services providers. InfoNet provides agencies an easy way to comply with a myriad of federal and state reporting requirements, but it is also intended to give agencies a flexible and user‐friendly data collection tool for analyzing information in a variety of ways. Prior to InfoNet, over a dozen different reports were submitted manually to different funders. Each separate report took hours, even days for each agency to compile. A huge amount of time was spent on answering the same questions in slightly different variations. Victim advocates collected the data, compiled the data, typed up reports and hurried to meet postmarking deadlines, sometimes four times a year per report. Advocates and administrators around the state labored beneath a veritable mountain of paperwork. No more! Now, InfoNet generates over 30 different types of reports automatically, ready as soon as client data is entered. For more complex analysis, users may also request custom reports from OCVA via e‐mail. Since InfoNet began, OCVA has compiled over 2,000 custom reports for individual agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Crime in Washington Annual Report
    3060 Willamette Drive NE Lacey, WA 98516 360-486-2380 (Phone) 360-486-2381 (Fax) www.waspc.org President FOR RELEASE Sheriff Rick Scott Grays Harbor County July 7, 2021 President-Elect Statements attributable to: Chief Steve Crown City of Wenatchee Steven D. Strachan Executive Director Vice President Sheriff Tom Jones Grant County WASHINGTON LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES REPORTED Past President INCREASE IN CRIME STATEWIDE IN 2020 Chief Craig Meidl City of Spokane (Lacey, WA) – Overall crime in Washington State increased in 2020 according to a Treasurer report released this week by the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs Chief Brett Vance City of Montesano (WASPC). The annual report tracks crime and arrest data from contributing law enforcement agencies throughout Washington. Executive Board Chief John Batiste The Crime in Washington 2020 report is compiled with data from 233 state, county, Washington State Patrol municipal, and Tribal agencies and is published in conjunction with the FBI, which will Chief Cherie Harris compile and release national data based upon state reports later this year. The City of Kirkland report is designed to give residents, elected officials, and law enforcement data- Sheriff Mitzi Johanknecht driven information about crime in their communities. King County Chief Darrell Lowe The report shows that in 2020 murders were up almost 47% and have increased City of Redmond overall 67% since 2016. Manslaughter went up 100%, fraud increased by 131%, while Sheriff Kevin Morris drug and narcotic offenses, and reported hate crimes were down slightly. The total Douglas County number of commissioned officers statewide was down from 1.24 per thousand to st Chief Rafael Padilla 1.19 per thousand people.
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 Crime in Washington
    The Crime In Washington 2009 Annual Report is prepared by Criminal Justice Information Support Staff: Kellie Lapczynski, Statistical Compiler Linda Schaffel, NIBRS Specialist Tonya Todd, Document Imager Joan Smith, CJIS Manager The Washington State Uniform Crime Reporting Program is a cooperative effort of: Washington Association of Washington State Criminal Sheriffs and Police Chiefs Justice Training Commission 3060 Willamette Drive NE 19010 1st Avenue South Lacey, WA 98516 Seattle, WA 98148 Phone: (360) 486-2380 Phone: (206) 835-7300 Fax: (360) 486-2381 Fax: (206) 439-3752 Website: www.waspc.org Website: www.cjtc.state.wa.us Donald G. Pierce, Michael D. Parsons, Ph. D., Executive Director Executive Director Front cover designed by Tonya Todd CRIME IN WASHINGTON STATE - 2009 SUMMARY RATE OF INDEX CRIME Index crimes in Washington State totaled 266,288 for 2009, constituting 40.0 offenses per 1,000 persons. This represents a decrease of 1.7% in the index crime rate over 2008. POPULATION **The estimated population in Washington for 2009 was 6,668,200 as compared to 6,587,600 for 2008. This represents a 1.22% increase. VIOLENT CRIME Violent crime offenses are murder, forcible rape, robbery, and aggravated assault. Reported violent crime offenses totaled 21,920 for 2009. The violent crime rate per 1,000 persons for 2009 is 3.29, which is an increase of 0.8% compared to 2008. While simple assault can be violent, it is not generally serious in nature therefore is excluded from the categorization of violent crime for this publication. PROPERTY CRIME Property crime offenses are burglary, larceny, motor vehicle theft, and arson.
    [Show full text]
  • Juvenile Curfew Practices in Washington State
    Juvenile Curfew Practices in Washington State Sharon Silas with Roxanne Lieb November 1997 Juvenile Curfew Practices in Washington State Sharon Silas with Roxanne Lieb November 1997 WASHINGTON STATE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY The Evergreen State College Mail Stop: TA-00, Seminar 3162 Olympia, Washington 98505 Phone: (360) 866-6000, ext. 6380 Fax: (360) 866-6825 World Wide Web: http://www.wa.gov/wsipp Document Number: 97-11-1201 WASHINGTON STATE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY MISSION The Washington Legislature created the Washington State Institute for Public Policy in 1983. A Board of Directors—representing the legislature, the governor, and public universities— governs the Institute, hires the director, and guides the development of all activities. The Institute’s mission is to carry out practical research, at legislative direction, on issues of importance to Washington State. The Institute conducts research activities using its own policy analysts, academic specialists from universities, and consultants. New activities grow out of requests from the Washington Legislature and executive branch agencies, often directed through legislation. Institute staff work closely with legislators, as well as legislative, executive, and state agency staff to define and conduct research on appropriate state public policy topics. Current assignments include a wide range of projects in criminal justice, youth violence, social services, K-12 education, and state government organization. BOARD OF DIRECTORS Senator Karen Fraser Ken Conte, House Office of Program
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Advocacy Essentials a Core Training for Legal Advocates
    Legal Advocacy Essentials A core training for legal advocates Table of Contents What is a legal advocate? Legal advocacy, safety & self-determination Legal advocacy Do’s & Don’ts Legal advocacy vs. legal advice & the unauthorized practice of law Criminal legal issues Duties of law enforcement DV Crimes How criminal cases proceed System-based advocates Crime Victims’ Bill of Rights Crime Victims Compensation Frequently Asked Questions for Victims in DV Criminal Cases Role of community-based DV advocate Survivors arrested for/charged with DV (“victim-defendants”) Batterer Intervention Programs Practical Strategies for DV Advocates Civil legal issues Protective Orders – General information Role of Advocates No Contact Orders Protection Orders Anti-Harassment Orders Restraining Orders Sexual Assault Protection Orders Vulnerable Adult Protection Orders Full Faith & Credit Divorce & Legal Separation Parenting Plans Paternity & Parentage Actions Family court services, GALs, parenting evaluators & CASA volunteers Role of Advocates in Family Law issues Working with Attorneys Pro Se & Unbundled legal services Parental Kidnapping Lawsuits Interpreters Immigration information Legal Advocacy Essentials: a core training for legal advocates Presented by the Washington State Coalition Against Domestic Violence, 2008. 1 This information is not intended as a substitute for legal advice. Confidential identity APS & CPS DSHS Public Assistance Employment issues Housing issues RCWs, WACs and GRs to know and love Legal Advocacy Essentials: a core training for legal advocates Presented by the Washington State Coalition Against Domestic Violence, 2008. 2 This information is not intended as a substitute for legal advice. What is a legal advocate? Legal Advocacy, Safety & Self-Determination • Most survivors have legal needs & will want to discuss legal matters.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington State Implementation Plan FY 17 - 20 Violence Against Women STOP Grant Award No
    Violence Against Women STOP Grant Award No. 2017-WF-AX-0030 Washington State Implementation Plan FY 17 - 20 Violence Against Women STOP Grant Award No. 2017-WF-AX-0030 Washington State Implementation Plan FY 17 - 20 TABLE OF CONTENTS STATE OF WASHINGTON I. 3INTRODUCTION Plan Approval ..........................................................................................................1 Time Period Covered by Plan ..................................................................................2 II. 4BDESCRIPTION OF PLANNING PROCESS Description of Planning Process ..............................................................................2 Documentation from Planning Members .................................................................4 Collaboration Efforts with Victim Service Providers not included in the Planning Committee ................................................................................................................4 Collaboration Efforts with Tribal Governments ......................................................5 Coordination of Plan with FVPSA, VOCA & RPE Plans .......................................6 III. 5BNEEDS AND CONTEXT State Demographic Information ...............................................................................7 Methods Used for Demographic Information ..........................................................9 Washington State’s Crime Statistics ......................................................................11 IV. 6BPLAN PRIORITIES AND APPROACHES Identified Goal .......................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • 2020-11-28 Resolution on Securing Public Safety For
    Resolution on Securing Public Safety for ALL1 WHEREAS, the role of police in a democracy is to serve and protect all individuals. Everyone’s right to life and liberty requires personal safety: protection against intimidation, assault, murder, rape, etc. Securing that safety is a noble calling. WHEREAS, officer misconduct violates this purpose, breaks the public trust, and jeopardizes the lives of those they are sworn to protect. WHEREAS, we support racial justice movements and efforts to end systemic racism nationwide, statewide, and here in Whatcom County; WHEREAS, we strongly support the right to non-violent protest and the First Amendment rights of free speech, freedom of assembly, and the ability to petition government for the redress of grievances; WHEREAS, our Platform includes planks that align with racial justice reforms and assert that homelessness, drug use, and nonviolent mental health issues should never be treated as crimes;2 WHEREAS, in Whatcom County, Black, American Indian and Alaska Native, and Hispanic people are each arrested and jailed at over three times the rate of white people after eliminating the effect of multiple bookings per individual.3 Law enforcement is disproportionately and unjustly carried out against people of color, the poor, and the homeless. This is unacceptable. WHEREAS, our federal and state legislatures have criminalized activity that poses little or no serious threat to others. In doing so, they have burdened police with tasks that should never have been assigned to them, distracting from their core purpose of ensuring universal public safety. WHEREAS, we commend Whatcom County Prosecutor Eric Richey for establishing the new Whatcom Law Enforcement Assisted Diversion (LEAD) program, which allows law enforcement officers to divert persons to treatment when they’re apprehended for low-level drug offenses or crimes of poverty instead of entering the criminal justice system.4 WHEREAS, we commend Chief David Doll for removing the Thin Blue Line flag from the Bellingham Police Department sign in response to complaints.
    [Show full text]
  • Drug Addiction Treatment and the Use of Criminal Sanctions
    IS IT TIME TO END THE WAR ON DRUGS? _______________________________________________________________________ AN EXAMINATION OF CURRENT LAW AND PRACTICE IN DRUG ABUSE PREVENTION, DRUG ADDICTION TREATMENT AND THE USE OF CRIMINAL SANCTIONS DECEMBER 2001 King County Bar Association Drug Policy Project 900 Fourth Avenue, Suite 600 Seattle, Washington 98164-1060 www.kcba.org Table of Contents King County Bar Association Drug Policy Statement Adopted by the Board of Trustees 5 Introduction 11 Conclusions and Recommendations 13 _______________________________________________________________________ SECTION I EFFECTIVE DRUG ABUSE PREVENTION: KEEPING OUR YOUTH OUT OF TROUBLE 1. Youth Involvement with Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drugs 28 Current Trends in Washington and the Nation 28 Statistical Caution: Drug Use vs. Drug Abuse 29 Criminal Justice Contact – Increased Cost and Increased Harm 30 Opportunity for Cost Savings 31 2. Trying to Explain Juvenile Substance Abuse: 32 Risk Factors and Protective Factors Risk Factors 32 Protective Factors 34 Washington State Profile 34 Co-Occuring Behaviors and the “Gateway Theory” Fallacy 35 3. The Promise and Perils of Drug Abuse Prevention Programs 36 Changing Approaches to Prevention 36 The Failure of D.A.R.E. 37 Searching for Effective Prevention Programs 37 Finding the Key Elements 38 Measuring Use or Abuse? 39 4. Improving Washington’s Drug Abuse Prevention Strategy 41 Prevention Goals 41 1 Table of Contents (cont.) SECTION II DRUG ADDICTION TREATMENT: THE NEED FOR RESOURCES 1. Drug addiction is a source of serious and costly problems in Washington. 44 2. Society is justified in offering and, sometimes, in requiring drug addiction treatment. 46 3. Drug treatment should have multiple objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • If I Had One More Day… (2006)
    If I had one more day… Findings and Recommendations from the Washington State Domestic Violence Fatality Review December 2006 By Kelly Starr and Jake Fawcett for the Washington State Coalition Against Domestic Violence If I Had One More Day… Table of Contents Findings and Recommendations Prologue …………………………………………………… 1 from the Washington Acknowledgements ……………………………………… 2 State Domestic Violence In This Report ……………………………………………… 4 Fatality Review Executive Summary ……………………………………… 5 By Overview of Fatalities …………………………………… 25 Kelly Starr and Spotlight on Suicide: Exploring the Jake Fawcett Connection Between Suicide for the and Domestic Violence ………………………………… 34 Washington State Coalition Planning for Safety ……………………………………… 42 Against Domestic Violence Teens ………………………………………………………… 47 December 2006 Building Community Capacity ………………………… 51 Economic Issues …………………………………………… 58 Alcohol and Other Drugs ………………………………… 63 Criminal Legal System …………………………………… 67 Civil Legal Issues ………………………………………… 77 Epilogue …………………………………………………… 83 List of Victims ……………………………………………… 84 Appendix A ………………………………………………… 87 History and Description of the Domestic Violence Fatality Review Appendix B ………………………………………………… 93 Glossary of Terms Appendix C ………………………………………………… 94 Copy-ready Pages for Handouts Appendix D ……………………………………………… 100 Index of Topics in Fatality Review Reports The Washington State Coalition Against Domestic Violence gratefully acknowledges that this project was supported by funding from the Washington State Department of Social and Health Services,
    [Show full text]
  • Violent Crime Trends and Geographic Variations SERVICES RESEARCH PROJECT by Joe Campo, MPH Research Brief No
    WASHINGTON STATE OFFICE OF FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT WASHINGTON STATE HEALTH Violent Crime Trends and Geographic Variations SERVICES RESEARCH PROJECT By Joe Campo, MPH Research Brief No. 079 OFM Health Care Research Center October 2016 The Office of Financial Management’s Health Care Research Center and its criminal justice Statistical Analysis Center have begun collaborating on the development of an online geographic information system. Once completed, that system will allow users to map various measures using both criminal justice and health-related data. In this research brief we use data compiled for that system to focus on violent crimes in Washington state. These data allow us to identify trends seen nationally, statewide and by county; to assess variations in violent crime rates seen among the counties; and, by in-depth examination of health- related data, to better understand the variation in the severity of injury among those violent crimes. For this brief, arrest data from the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Uniform Crime Reporting Program’s Summary Reporting System (SRS) are used as the primary source of crime data. Vital statistics death data are used in comparing murder arrests and deaths, and inpatient and observation unit stays are used in comparing aggravated assault arrests and hospital stays. Joinpoint1 is used in identifying trends and, unless otherwise noted, 95 percent confidence intervals are used in determining if differences seen are statistically significant. Trends Figure 1 Violent Crime Arrests per 100,000 Persons The rate of violent crime arrests, which includes murder WA and U.S. Trend of Rates, 1984–2011, SRS and manslaughter, forcible rape, robbery and aggravated 1000 assault, reached a high point in the United States (US) and in Washington in the early 1990s.
    [Show full text]
  • Crime in Washington 2007
    WASHINGTON STATE UNIFORM CRIME REPORT is prepared by Criminal Justice Information Support Staff: Linda Schaffel, CJIS Manager Tonya Todd, Document Imager Kellie Lapczynski, Statistical Compiler THE WASHINGTON STATE UNIFORM CRIME REPORTING PROJECT IS A COOPERATIVE EFFORT OF: WASHINGTON ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON STATE CRIMINAL SHERIFFS AND POLICE CHIEFS JUSTICE TRAINING COMMISSION 3060 Willamette Dr. NE 19010 – 1st Avenue South Lacey, WA 98516 Seattle, WA 98148 Phone: (360) 486-2380 Phone: (206) 835-7300 Fax: (360) 486-2381 Fax: (206) 439-3752 Website: www.waspc.org Website: www.cjtc.state.wa.us Donald G. Pierce, Michael D. Parsons, Ph. D., Executive Director Executive Director Front cover designed by Tonya Todd. CRIME IN WASHINGTON STATE - 2007 SUMMARY RATE OF INDEX CRIME - Index crimes in Washington State totaled 280,538 for 2007, constituting 43.3 offenses per 1,000 persons. This represents a decrease of 10.2% in the index crime rate over 2006. POPULATION - **The estimated population in Washington for 2007 was 6,488,000 as compared to 6,375,600 for 2006. This represents a 1.76% increase. VIOLENT CRIME - Violent crime offenses are murder, forcible rape, robbery, and aggravated assault. Reported violent crime offenses totaled 21,409 for 2007. The violent crime rate per 1,000 persons for 2007 is 3.30, which is a decrease of 3.8% compared to 2006. While simple assault can be violent, it is not generally serious in nature therefore is excluded from the categorization of violent crime for this publication. PROPERTY CRIME - Property crime offenses are burglary, larceny, motor vehicle theft, and arson. Reported property crime offenses totaled 259,129 for 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • Police Strategies LLC
    Demographic Disparity Analysis of Law Enforcement Data from the Spokane Police Department January 11, 2021 Police Strategies LLC www.policestrategies.com This study was funded by the Spokane Police Department. This research was conducted independently, and the findings and recommendations presented within this report are from the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official positions or opinions of the Spokane Police Department or the City of Spokane. The authors wish to thank Chief Craig Meidl, Assistant Chief Justin Lundgren, Jacqui MacConnell, Shawna Ernst, and Kathy Armstrong for providing the information and data needed to conduct this study. Please direct questions regarding this report to Bob Scales, CEO, Police Strategies LLC, 13197 N Madison Ave NE, Bainbridge Island, WA 98110; Phone: (206) 915-8683; Email: [email protected] ABOUT THE AUTHORS Police Strategies LLC is a Washington State based company that was formed in February 2015. The company was built by law enforcement professionals, attorneys, and academics with the primary goal of helping police departments use their own incident reports to make data-driven decisions and develop evidence-based best practices. The company’s three partners are all former employees of the Seattle Police Department and were directly involved with the Department of Justice’s pattern or practice investigation of the department in 2011 as well as the federal consent decree that followed. The partners took the lessons learned from that experience and now provide other police departments with the tools they need to monitor their use of force incidents, identify high risk behavior, and evaluate the outcomes of any reforms that are implemented.
    [Show full text]