Damascus: from the Fall of Persia to the Roman Conquest

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Damascus: from the Fall of Persia to the Roman Conquest Dead Sea Discoveries 25 (2018) 299–318 brill.com/dsd Damascus: From the Fall of Persia to the Roman Conquest Paul J. Kosmin Harvard University [email protected] Abstract This contribution aims to provide an outline of the political dynamics, cultural devel- opments, and, ultimately, historical semantics of the city of Damascus for the circle(s) of its eponymous Document. Keywords Damascus – Seleucid empire – Ptolemaic empire – Damascus Document – urbanism 1 Introduction Damascus appears seven times in the Document that bears its name. “The land -is named as the dwelling of the “returners” or “con (ארץ דמשק) ”of Damascus from the land of Judah (CD 6:5). Four ( שבי ישראל) verts” or “penitents” of Israel times, “the land of Damascus” is the site where a new covenant was established or entered into (CD 6:19, 8:21, 19:33‒34, and 20:12). Finally, Damascus appears with reference to two biblical passages: in allusion to Amos 5:26‒27a—“I will exile the tents of your king and the foundation of your images beyond the tents ;(as the destination of displacement (CD 7:15—”(מאהלי דמשק) of Damascus and in an interpretation of Numbers 24:17—“A star has left Jacob, a staff has risen from Israel”—the star is identified as “the Interpreter of the Law who will CD 7:18‒20). The latter use is also) ”(דורש התורה הבא דמשק) come to Damascus attested in the Qumran manuscript 4Q266 3 iii 20. Damascus is the only loca- tion outside Israel or Judah to be mentioned in this Document; no other such references to the city are found in the extant Dead Sea Scrolls. © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, 2018 | doi:10.1163/15685179-12341482Downloaded from Brill.com09/27/2021 01:49:57PM via free access 300 Kosmin The Syrian city’s prominence within this one text has been understood in various ways. On the basis of internal scriptural allusion, an influential strand of scholarship has taken the Document’s “Damascus” and “the land of Damascus” to be a cipher for Babylonia and the Babylonian exile.1 Others have identified “the land of Damascus” as a textual symbol for Qumran itself, on the basis of a tradition that interpreted Damascus as the site of God’s eschatologi- cal sanctuary.2 Indeed, it has also been claimed, implausibly, that “the land of Damascus” was employed as a geopolitical label for the Nabatean kingdom, and so a term that could at certain moments include Qumran and the shores of the Dead Sea.3 Finally, “Damascus” and “the land of Damascus” have been taken in their plain sense, with the Document recounting a real, historically- situated migration to and community formation within the ancient Syrian city and its chōra.4 With a text as allusive and polyvalent as the Damascus Document, it is not possible to determine finally whether “Damascus” stands for Babylon, Qumran, or, indeed, Damascus. Yet, the actual city and region of Damascus have been entirely missing from scholarly analysis. Damascus was a real place, a near neighbor to the north, that occupied a significant and increasingly urgent role in the political and cultural life of third- to first-century BCE Judea. Even if the 1 See, e.g., Stephen Hultgren, From the Damascus Covenant to the Covenant of the Community: Literary, Historical, and Theological Studies in the Dead Sea Scrolls, STDJ 66 (Leiden: Brill, 2007), 96–108; Philip Davies, The Damascus Covenant: An Interpretation of the “Damascus Document,” JSOTSS 25 (Sheffield: Journal for the Study of the Old Testament, 1983), 122–23; Jerome Murphy-O’Connor, “The Essenes and their History,” RB 81 (1974): 215–44; Annie Jaubert, “Le pays de Damas,” RB 65 (1958): 214–48 (225–34); Isaac Rabinowitz, “A Reconsideration of ‘Damascus’ and ‘390 Years’ in the ‘Damascus’ (‘Zadokite’) Fragments,” JBL 73 (1954): 11–35. 2 See, e.g., Geza Vermes, Scripture and Tradition in Judaism: Haggadic Studies (Leiden: Brill, 1973), 43–49, and Jaubert, “Le pays,” 234–35. 3 Robert North, “The Damascus of Qumran Geography,” PEQ 86 (1955): 34–47. This is very un- likely: while it is true that the Nabatean king Aretas III briefly occupied Damascus, perhaps at the request of its citizens, this rule extended only from 83/2 to 72/1 BCE, with possible interruptions (see below); the city was not claimed again even when opportunity permitted with the retreat of Tigranes II. It is highly unlikely that the name of a city so briefly dominat- ed and at a political periphery transferred to all the territory of a long-established kingdom by now centered at Petra. 4 Joseph Baumgarten, Qumran Cave 4. XIII: The Damascus Document (4Q266–273), DJD 18 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996), 9–10; Samuel Iwry, “The Exegetical Method of the Damascus Document Reconsidered”, in Methods of Investigation of the Dead Sea Scrolls and the Khirbet Qumran Site, ed. Michael Wise, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 722 (New York: New York Academy of Sciences, 1994), 329–38. See also Ben Zion Wacholder, The New Damascus Document: The Midrash on the Eschatological Torah of the Dead Sea Scrolls: Reconstruction, Translation, and Commentary, STDJ 56 (Leiden: Brill, 2007), 10, 158–59, 229, 237–38, who considers “Damascus” as Damascus but the migration as a prediction. Dead Sea DiscoveriesDownloaded 25 from (2018) Brill.com09/27/2021 299–318 01:49:57PM via free access Damascus: From the Fall of Persia to the Roman Conquest 301 Document’s “Damascus” were but a fictional label or a future destination, the historical developments of the contemporary city gave the term a wider seman- tic force. This is in no way to dismiss the role of biblical and prophetic associa- tions; rather, it is to suggest an additional range of meanings and concerns that were present to the authors and audience of the Damascus Document, even as the total shipwreck of Hellenistic historiography and the disciplinary reflexes of biblical studies have led to their systematic overshadowing. Since the earliest copy of the Damascus Document (4Q266) (with mention at 3 iii 20) dates to the first half or the middle of the first century BCE,5 דמשק of I will examine the history of Damascus down to the Roman provincialization of Syria in 64/3 BCE. The following contribution aims to provide an outline of the political dynamics, cultural developments, and, ultimately, historical se- mantics of the city of Damascus for the circle(s) of its eponymous Document. It must be acknowledged that our evidence is extremely exiguous, amounting to not much more than a few brief references in classical texts, especially geog- raphers and historians paraphrasing now-lost Hellenistic histories, a couple of relevant papyri or inscriptions, and coins. The history of Damascus, from the fall of the Achaemenid empire to the Roman conquest, can be understood as the combined effect of two fundamen- tal conditions, one geographical—oasis urbanism—and the other political— imperial conflict. 2 Oasis Urbanism Much of the character and dynamics of Hellenistic, indeed, of pre-modern Damascus derive from its intersectional location between the Levantine coast- al system and the Syrian desert (see Map 1). The Antilebanon mountain range, looming above Damascus to its west, cuts the city off from easy access to the Mediterranean Sea and the Phoenician littoral; Damascus would never enjoy substantial maritime interests nor a share in the developing cultural koinē of the Hellenized Phoenician world. Instead, the Barada river (Abana in the Bible, Chrysorhoas to the Greeks) channeled the mountain’s trapped rain and snowmelt eastward, down into the gentle plain of Damascus, making it the best-watered of all the inland Levantine cities. Significant investment in an irri- gation infrastructure—canals, wells, and water-lifting technology—formed the 5 Baumgarten, The Damascus Document, 266. Dead Sea Discoveries 25 (2018) 299–318 Downloaded from Brill.com09/27/2021 01:49:57PM via free access 302 Kosmin Map 1 The geographical setting of Damascus Adapted from Burns, Damascus, xvii, Fig. 0.2, by the Harvard Map Collection extensive, miraculously fertile Ghouta oasis to the city’s east.6 The Ghouta’s or- chards and gardens were famed across west Asia and the wider Mediterranean: the Peripatetic philosopher and botanist Theophrastus, for instance, noted that the Damascene terebinth was far taller and more handsome than that of Macedonia or the Troad;7 plums came to be called damaskēna in the Greek- speaking Mediterranean after the city’s favored fruit.8 All Damascene history takes place within this embrace of agricultural abundance, a hypertrophy cel- ebrated most brilliantly in the paradisiacal visions of the Umayyad mosque’s mosaic facade. An Imperial-period inscription from Harran el-Awamid, some forty kilometers east of the city, commemorates local aristocrats hunting 6 Thomas Weber, “‘Damaskòs Pólis Epísēmos’: Hellenistische, römische und byzantinische Bauwerke in Damaskus aus der Sicht griechischer und lateinischer Schriftquellen,” Damaszener Mitteilungen 7 (1993): 135–76 (139–44). 7 Theophrastus, Hist. pl. 3.15.3. 8 Athenaeus, 1.49d–e, with Thomas Weber, “ΔΑΜΑΣΚΗΝΑ: Landwirtschaftliche Produkte aus der Oase von Damaskus im Spiegel griechisher und lateinischer Schriftquellen,” ZDPV 105 (1989): 151–65 (155–62). Dead Sea DiscoveriesDownloaded 25 from (2018) Brill.com09/27/2021 299–318 01:49:57PM via free access Damascus: From the Fall of Persia to the Roman Conquest 303 gazelles at the oasis’ edge,9 an activity also celebrated by the later Arab court. Sadly, the nature of the relationship between the city and oasis is little known for the Hellenistic and Roman periods: it remains unclear, for instance, where village settlements clustered, to what extent they functioned as autonomous administrative units, how irrigation was organized and maintained, and in what ways modes of exploitation and land ownership changed.
Recommended publications
  • The Orontids of Armenia by Cyril Toumanoff
    The Orontids of Armenia by Cyril Toumanoff This study appears as part III of Toumanoff's Studies in Christian Caucasian History (Georgetown, 1963), pp. 277-354. An earlier version appeared in the journal Le Muséon 72(1959), pp. 1-36 and 73(1960), pp. 73-106. The Orontids of Armenia Bibliography, pp. 501-523 Maps appear as an attachment to the present document. This material is presented solely for non-commercial educational/research purposes. I 1. The genesis of the Armenian nation has been examined in an earlier Study.1 Its nucleus, succeeding to the role of the Yannic nucleus ot Urartu, was the 'proto-Armenian,T Hayasa-Phrygian, people-state,2 which at first oc- cupied only a small section of the former Urartian, or subsequent Armenian, territory. And it was, precisely, of the expansion of this people-state over that territory, and of its blending with the remaining Urartians and other proto- Caucasians that the Armenian nation was born. That expansion proceeded from the earliest proto-Armenian settlement in the basin of the Arsanias (East- ern Euphrates) up the Euphrates, to the valley of the upper Tigris, and espe- cially to that of the Araxes, which is the central Armenian plain.3 This expand- ing proto-Armenian nucleus formed a separate satrapy in the Iranian empire, while the rest of the inhabitants of the Armenian Plateau, both the remaining Urartians and other proto-Caucasians, were included in several other satrapies.* Between Herodotus's day and the year 401, when the Ten Thousand passed through it, the land of the proto-Armenians had become so enlarged as to form, in addition to the Satrapy of Armenia, also the trans-Euphratensian vice-Sa- trapy of West Armenia.5 This division subsisted in the Hellenistic phase, as that between Greater Armenia and Lesser Armenia.
    [Show full text]
  • Odyssey Glossary of Names
    GLOSSARY OF NAMES GLOSSARY OF NAMES [Note, the following is raw output from OCR software, and is otherwise unedited.] (First appearance noted by book and line number.) Achaeans (A-kee'-unz): General term used by Homer to reFer to Greeks. 2.139 Acheron (A'-ker-on): River in the Underworld, land of the dead. 10.537 Achilles (A-kil'-eez): Son of Peleus and Thetis. He is the heroic leader of the Myrmidons in the Trojan War and is slain by Paris. Odysseus consults him in the Underworld. 3.117 Aeaea (Ee-ee'-a): Island on which Circe lives. 9.34 Aegisthus (Ee-jis'-thus): Son of Thyestes and Pelopia. He seduces Clytemnestra, wife of Agamemnon, while Agamemnon is away fighting the Trojan War and helps her slay Agamemnon when he returns. Orestes avenges this action years later by murdering both Clytemnestra and Aegisthus. 1.35 GLOSSARY OF NAMES Aegyptus (Ee-jip'-tus): The Nile River. 4.511 Aeolus (Ee'-oh-lus): King of the island Aeolia and keeper of the winds. 10.2 Aeson (Ee'-son): Son oF Cretheus and Tyro; father of Jason, leader oF the Argonauts. 11.262 Aethon (Ee'-thon): One oF Odysseus' aliases used in his conversation with Penelope. 19.199 Agamemnon (A-ga-mem'-non): Son oF Atreus and Aerope; brother of Menelaus; husband oF Clytemnestra. He commands the Greek Forces in the Trojan War. He is killed by his wiFe and her lover when he returns home; his son, Orestes, avenges this murder. 1.36 Agelaus (A-je-lay'-us): One oF Penelope's suitors; son oF Damastor; killed by Odysseus.
    [Show full text]
  • A Political History of the Kingdom of Jerusalem 1099 to 1187 C.E
    Western Washington University Western CEDAR WWU Honors Program Senior Projects WWU Graduate and Undergraduate Scholarship Spring 2014 A Political History of the Kingdom of Jerusalem 1099 to 1187 C.E. Tobias Osterhaug Western Washington University Follow this and additional works at: https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwu_honors Part of the Higher Education Commons, and the History Commons Recommended Citation Osterhaug, Tobias, "A Political History of the Kingdom of Jerusalem 1099 to 1187 C.E." (2014). WWU Honors Program Senior Projects. 25. https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwu_honors/25 This Project is brought to you for free and open access by the WWU Graduate and Undergraduate Scholarship at Western CEDAR. It has been accepted for inclusion in WWU Honors Program Senior Projects by an authorized administrator of Western CEDAR. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 Tobias Osterhaug History 499/Honors 402 A Political History of the Kingdom of Jerusalem 1099 to 1187 C.E. Introduction: The first Crusade, a massive and unprecedented undertaking in the western world, differed from the majority of subsequent crusades into the Holy Land in an important way: it contained no royalty and was undertaken with very little direct support from the ruling families of Western Europe. This aspect of the crusade led to the development of sophisticated hierarchies and vassalages among the knights who led the crusade. These relationships culminated in the formation of the Crusader States, Latin outposts in the Levant surrounded by Muslim states, and populated primarily by non-Catholic or non-Christian peoples. Despite the difficulties engendered by this situation, the Crusader States managed to maintain control over the Holy Land for much of the twelfth century, and, to a lesser degree, for several decades after the Fall of Jerusalem in 1187 to Saladin.
    [Show full text]
  • The Illnesses of Herod the Great 1. Introduction 2. Sources of Information
    The illnesses of Herod the Great THE ILLNESSES OF HEROD THE GREAT ABSTRACT Herod the Great, Idumean by birth, was king of the Jews from 40BC to AD 4. An able statesman, builder and warrior, he ruthlessly stamped out all perceived opposi- tion to his rule. His last decade was characterised by vicious strife within his family and progressive ill health. We review the nature of his illnesses and suggest that he had meningoencephalitis in 59 BC, and that he died primarily of uraemia and hyper- tensive heart failure, but accept diabetes mellitus as a possible underlying etiological factor. The possibility that Josephus’s classical description of Herod’s disease could be biased by “topos” biography (popular at the time), is discussed. The latter conside- ration is particularly relevant in determining the significance of the king’s reputed worm- infested genital lesions. 1. INTRODUCTION Herod the Great, king of the Jews at the onset of the Christian era, had no Jewish blood in his veins. Infamous in Christian tradition for the massacre of the newborn in Bethlehem, he was nevertheless a vigorous and able ruler, a prolific builder, friend and ally of Rome and founder of an extensive Herodian dynasty which significantly influenced the history of Palestine. His miserable death at the age of 69 years was seen by the Jewish religious fraternity as Jahweh’s just retribution for his vio- lation of Judaic traditions (Ferguson 1987:328-330; Sizoo 1950:6-9). The nature and cause of his illness and death is the subject of this study. 2. SOURCES OF INFORMATION With the exception of fragmentary contributions from Rabbinic tradi- tions, Christian records in the New Testament and evidence from con- temporary coins, Herod’s biography comes to us predominantly through the writings of Flavius Josephus, a Jewish priest of aristocratic descent, military commander in a revolt against Rome, but subsequent recipient of Roman citizenship.
    [Show full text]
  • Concept of a Crusade Within Each Faith in an Attempt to Ascertain the Roots of the Actions of Christian and Muslim Crusades
    InSight: RIVIER ACADEMIC JOURNAL, VOLUME 5, NUMBER 2, FALL 2009 CONCEPT OF A CRUSAID Thomas Jackson* Master of Arts in Teaching Social Studies Program, Rivier College Keywords: Crusades, Islam, Pope, Warfare, Christianity Abstract Mention the word Crusade and depending on who is listening, the word's meaning and cultural impact varies significantly. Specifically, the Medieval Crusades, often traditionally defined by historians as offensive military campaigns waged by Christians to recapture the Holy Land from Muslims are held out as an example of western exploitation of Islam. Much work by authors such as John M. Riddle and Jonathan Riley-Smith has highlighted the historical events but has not considered the possibility these Crusades were defensive actions to counter previous Islamic advances into Christian territories. This paper will first examine the origins of Christianity and Islam, their spread, and the general concept of a Crusade within each faith in an attempt to ascertain the roots of the actions of Christian and Muslim Crusades. There will be an examination of the early Islamic advances into the Christian Levant. The work will assess the 1094 call for help by Byzantine Emperor Alexius Comnenus I to thwart the Seljuk Muslim invaders. The paper will also examine the abhorrent Western European behavior during the Crusades. Finally, in a thoughtful postmortem analysis, the case will made that if the Crusades were not undertaken, Europe and its culture that we know today may not have existed. Introduction Mention the word Crusades and depending on who you converse with, the word's connotation and historical impact varies significantly with Christians and Muslims often holding diametrically opposing views.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    chapter 1 Introduction The study of Herod Antipas is relevant from both histor- region. This volume is meant to help expand the current ical and theological perspectives. Research of his life and understanding of Herod Antipas, his reign and his territo- reign is important for the understanding, inter alia, of first- ries and its inhabitants by examining and discussing his century Galilee and the historical Jesus. coinage in detail. Antipas ruled Galilee, a region in the northern part of Palestine, along with Peraea, which lay in Transjordan. Naturally, “Antipas has emerged as the decisive factor of 1.1 Documentary Sources for Antipas explanation of the socio-economic realities of early first- century Galilee” (Jensen 2010:46). Numismatic studies, in As with many important individuals and events that took particular, are fundamental components of any study of place in Early Roman Palestine (63bce–70ce), most of the the Galilean economy. The dispersion and reasons for primary information we have regarding Herod Antipas is minting of coins of Antipas provide reflections of how from the works of Jewish historian Flavius Josephus (c. 37– trade was carried out. c. 100ce). His works are an invaluable and often unique Research on Antipas has become a vital component of source for near-eastern history. They provide insight into understanding the so-called “urban-rural” relationship in the society and culture of the late Second Temple period. Galilee: did Antipas act as a “buffer against direct Roman Josephus was a military leader in Galilee at the beginning rule and exploitation, thereby providing a good basis for of the First Revolt, thereby obtaining first-hand knowledge trade and mutual enrichment of both urban and rural of the region, albeit after Antipas’ rule (bj 2:568; Vita 28– areas” or was he a “typical tyrant extracting heavy taxes 29).
    [Show full text]
  • Who's Anti-Roman? Sallust and Pompeius Trogus on Mithridates." Classical Journal 101.4 (N.D.): 383-407
    Connecticut College Digital Commons @ Connecticut College Classics Faculty Publications Classics Department 4-2006 Who’s Anti-Roman? Sallust and Pompeius Trogus on Mithridates Eric Adler Connecticut College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.conncoll.edu/classfacpub Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons Recommended Citation Adler, E. "Who's Anti-Roman? Sallust And Pompeius Trogus On Mithridates." Classical Journal 101.4 (n.d.): 383-407. Web. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Classics Department at Digital Commons @ Connecticut College. It has been accepted for inclusion in Classics Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Connecticut College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The views expressed in this paper are solely those of the author. WHO'S ANTI-ROMAN? SALLUST AND POMPEIUS TROGUS ON MITHRIDATES Abstract: Contemporary scholars of Roman imperialism have discussed the ways in which ancient historians denigrate non-Romans and thereby present intellectual justificationsfor Roman conquest. This paper offers a case study that questions this position's validity: an examination of Sallust's Epistula Mithridatis (Hist. 4.69M) and Pompeius Trogus' speech of Mithridates (Justin 38.4-7). I argue that Sallust offers a more powerful attack on Roman foreign policy than does Trogus, whom many scholars have deemed "anti-Roman," and conclude that Roman historiansare capable of using
    [Show full text]
  • The Second Crusade, 1145-49: Damascus, Lisbon and the Wendish Campaigns
    The Second Crusade, 1145-49: Damascus, Lisbon and the Wendish Campaigns Abstract: The Second Crusade (1145-49) is thought to have encompassed near simultaneous Christian attacks on Muslim towns and cities in Syria and Iberia and pagan Wend strongholds around the southern shore of the Baltic Sea. The motivations underpinning the attacks on Damascus, Lisbon and – taken collectively – the Wendish strongholds have come in for particular attention. The doomed decision to assault Damascus in 1148 rather than recover Edessa, the capital of the first so-called crusader state, was once thought to be ill-conceived. Historians now believe the city was attacked because Damascus posed a significant threat to the Latin kingdom of Jerusalem when the Second Crusaders arrived in the East. The assault on Lisbon and the Wendish strongholds fell into a long-established pattern of regional, worldly aggression and expansion; therefore, historians tend not to ascribe any spiritual impulses behind the native Christians’ decisions to attack their enemies. Indeed, the siege of Lisbon by an allied force of international crusaders and those of the Portuguese ruler, Afonso Henriques, is perceived primarily as a politico-strategic episode in the on-going Christian-Muslim conflict in Iberia – commonly referred to as the reconquista. The native warrior and commercial elite undoubtedly had various temporal reasons for engaging in warfare in Iberia and the Baltic region between 1147 and 1149, although the article concludes with some notes of caution before clinically construing motivation from behaviour in such instances. On Christmas Eve 1144, Zangī, the Muslim ruler of Aleppo and Mosul, seized the Christian-held city of Edessa in Mesopotamia.
    [Show full text]
  • Pausanias' Description of Greece
    BONN'S CLASSICAL LIBRARY. PAUSANIAS' DESCRIPTION OF GREECE. PAUSANIAS' TRANSLATED INTO ENGLISH \VITTI NOTES AXD IXDEX BY ARTHUR RICHARD SHILLETO, M.A., Soiiii'tinie Scholar of Trinity L'olltge, Cambridge. VOLUME IT. " ni <le Fnusnnias cst un homme (jui ne mnnquo ni de bon sens inoins a st-s tlioux." hnniie t'oi. inais i}iii rn>it ou au voudrait croire ( 'HAMTAiiNT. : ftEOROE BELL AND SONS. YOUK STIIKKT. COVKNT (iAKDKX. 188t). CHISWICK PRESS \ C. WHITTINGHAM AND CO., TOOKS COURT, CHANCEKV LANE. fA LC >. iV \Q V.2- CONTEXTS. PAGE Book VII. ACHAIA 1 VIII. ARCADIA .61 IX. BtEOTIA 151 -'19 X. PHOCIS . ERRATA. " " " Volume I. Page 8, line 37, for Atte read Attes." As vii. 17. 2<i. (Catullus' Aft is.) ' " Page 150, line '22, for Auxesias" read Anxesia." A.-> ii. 32. " " Page 165, lines 12, 17, 24, for Philhammon read " Philanimon.'' " " '' Page 191, line 4, for Tamagra read Tanagra." " " Pa ire 215, linu 35, for Ye now enter" read Enter ye now." ' " li I'aijf -J27, line 5, for the Little Iliad read The Little Iliad.'- " " " Page ^S9, line 18, for the Babylonians read Babylon.'' " 7 ' Volume II. Page 61, last line, for earth' read Earth." " Page 1)5, line 9, tor "Can-lira'" read Camirus." ' ; " " v 1'age 1 69, line 1 , for and read for. line 2, for "other kinds of flutes "read "other thites.'' ;< " " Page 201, line 9. for Lacenian read Laeonian." " " " line 10, for Chilon read Cliilo." As iii. 1H. Pago 264, " " ' Page 2G8, Note, for I iad read Iliad." PAUSANIAS. BOOK VII. ACIIAIA.
    [Show full text]
  • The Representation of Nicolaus of Damascus in Josephus' Judaean Antiquities
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CU Scholar Institutional Repository University of Colorado, Boulder CU Scholar Classics Graduate Theses & Dissertations Classics Spring 1-1-2012 The Representation of Nicolaus of Damascus in Josephus’ Judaean Antiquities Sarah Christine Teets University of Colorado at Boulder, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholar.colorado.edu/clas_gradetds Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, Classical Literature and Philology Commons, and the Jewish Studies Commons Recommended Citation Teets, Sarah Christine, "The Representation of Nicolaus of Damascus in Josephus’ Judaean Antiquities" (2012). Classics Graduate Theses & Dissertations. Paper 3. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Classics at CU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Classics Graduate Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of CU Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Historian Historicized: The Representation of Nicolaus of Damascus in Josephus’ Judaean Antiquities by Sarah Christine Teets B.A., California State University, Long Beach, 2007 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Colorado in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Classics 2012 !! This thesis entitled: Historian Historicized: The Representation of Nicolaus of Damascus in Josephus’ Judaean Antiquities written by Sarah Christine Teets has been approved for the Department of Classics Professor Jacqueline M. Elliott Professor John Gibert Date The final copy of this thesis has been examined by the signatories, and we Find that both the content and the form meet acceptable presentation standards Of scholarly work in the above mentioned discipline.
    [Show full text]
  • Amirani XXXIV. 2021
    56 Ярославamirani Валентинович XXXIV. Пилипчук2021 istoria t History t История Ярослав Валентинович Пилипчук* В тени Ирана. Внешняя политика древних армян Yaroslav Valentinovich Pylypchuk** In the shadow of Iran. Foreign policy of Ancient Armenians Abstract: This paper is devoted to the history of foreign policy of Ancient Armenia. The first component in the ethnogenesis of the Armenians was Luwians. The second component in the ethnogenesis of the Armenians was the Caucasian-speaking Hurrians who inhabited Urartu. The third component of the ethnogenesis of Armenians is flies, which came from Phrygia and founded the Armenian kingdom of Melid. Keywords: Hayasa, Hurrians, flies, Scythians, Ervanduni, Artashesians, Arshakuni, Greater Armenia, Roman Empire, Parthia, Eranshahr. Древняя Армения привлекала многих исследователей. Арменоло- гия популярна как в Армении, так и в России и на Западе. Важными аспектами истории Армении являеться этногенез армян и внешняя политика при династиях Эрвандуни, Арташесян, Аршакуни. Арме- ния в древности была тесно связана с иранскими государствами и эллинистическим миром. Заданием данного исследования являеться исследование армянской предыистории и выяснение главных тенден- ций во внешней политике Древней Армении. В шумерском эпоссе упоминаеться страна Аратта. Также она упоминаться в ’’Махабхарате’’. В шумерских источниках Аратта город. А. Мовсисян считает, что Аррата это Армения. Ю. Маджидзаде и Дж. Хансман локализируют эту страну в Восточном Иране. Д. Поттс считает Аррату страной существовавшей только в легендах����������. ��������Р. Ишха- нян считал, что Аратта, которую он отождествляет с Арменией, кон- тактировала с Шумером. Н. Мкртчян пытался показать влияние ак- * Доктор исторических наук, старший преподаватель кафедры истории и археологии славян исторического факультета Национального педагогического университета им. М. П. Драгоманова, г. Киев, Украина. [email protected] ** Phd, Senior lecturer at the department of the History and Archaelogy of Slavs, Institute of Historical Education, M.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies in Pausanias' Periegesis Akujärvi, Johanna
    Researcher, Traveller, Narrator : Studies in Pausanias' Periegesis Akujärvi, Johanna 2005 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Akujärvi, J. (2005). Researcher, Traveller, Narrator : Studies in Pausanias' Periegesis. Almqvist & Wiksell International. Total number of authors: 1 General rights Unless other specific re-use rights are stated the following general rights apply: Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Read more about Creative commons licenses: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. LUND UNIVERSITY PO Box 117 221 00 Lund +46 46-222 00 00 Studia Graeca et Latina Lundensia 12 Researcher, Traveller, Narrator Studies in Pausanias’ Periegesis Johanna Akujärvi Lund 2005 Almqvist & Wiksell International Stockholm/Sweden © 2005 Johanna Akujärvi Distributed by Almqvist & Wiksell International P.O. Box 7634 S-103 94 Stockholm Sweden Phone: + 46 8 790 38 00 Fax: + 46 8 790 38 05 E-mail: [email protected] ISSN 1100-7931 ISBN 91-22-02134-5 Printed in Sweden Media-Tryck, Lund University Lund 2005 To Daniel Acknowledgements There are a number of people to whom I wish to express my gratitude.
    [Show full text]