DOCSLIB.ORG

Technologies for Civic Mobilization

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Technologies for Civic Mobilization Technologies for Civic Mobilization Civil resistance is a way for groups to advance rights, freedoms, governance and peace using nonviolent strategies. As you’ll see from the list below, technology has become an increasingly important part of the way nonviolent protestors spread campaign awareness, organize, connect with fellow activists, and remain secure in volatile or non-permissive environments. A collaboration between the Academy and the PeaceTech Initiative at the United States Institute of Peace, this is a list of practical technology tools that activists are currently using to further their civic mobilization goals, as well as specific examples of how these tools are having an impact all over the world – from Turkey to Ukraine to Venezuela. The examples range from simple mobile-phone based tools to more complex software applications. Some of the tools were created explicitly for activists. Others take mainstream communication applications and cleverly repurpose them for the needs of activists on the ground. This document is intended to be a primer for nonviolent civic activists who intend to incorporate technologies into their work more effectively. As with other civil resistance techniques, some technology tools are more relevant to certain situations than to others, and these tools do not come without their risks. Many repressive regimes are willing and able to employ a range of means to counter, intercept, and monitor the use of these tools by activists. Activists are advised to employ appropriate security measures, both technical and non-technical, before using these tools in the field. 1. Organizing Activists A. Twitter: A microblogging service that enables people in conflict zones with similar interests and motivations to connect with each other Use Cases: a. November 2013 Ukrainian protests against President Yanukovych: see here b. June 2013 Turkish protests to contest the urban development plan for Istanbul’s Taksim Gezi Park: see here c. June 2009 Iranian Election Protests: see here B. Zello: A face-to-face video messaging app (available for iOS and Android smartphones) that connects people in conflict zones Use Cases: a. 2014 Venezuelan protests in opposition to the government: see here b. November 2013 Ukrainian protests against President Yanukovych: see here c. NPR report: Zello App Gains Popularity With World’s Protesters (March 2014) C. Facebook: An online social networking site that helps to connect and mobilize protesters Use Cases: a. 2011 Arab Spring Egyptian Revolution: see here b. 2011 Arab Spring Tunisian uprising: see here D. Skype: A voice-over internet protocol service and instant messaging platform that allows groups to create invite-only ongoing conversations to coordinate protest efforts Use Case: a. 2010-present Syrian anti-Assad rebellion: see here E. People Power: A free iPhone and iPod touch application that offers access to the International Center on Nonviolent Conflict’s (ICNC) educational modules, research materials, and news on nonviolent struggles throughout the world 2. Raising Public Awareness A. Ustream: A video streaming service that allows protesters to share information with the wider public in real-time Use Cases: a. November 2013 Ukrainian protests against President Yanukovych: see here b. May 2012 anti-Putin protests in Russia: see here B. YouTube: A free video platform used by protesters to widely share information relevant to their cause Use Cases: a. November 2013 Ukrainian protesters using YouTube to counter Russian narrative of events: see here b. 2010-present Syrian anti-Assad rebellion: see here c. Google Report: Digital Activism on YouTube (July 2009) C. SMS Reporting: There are a number of open-source messaging software platforms that empower journalists and activist leaders to communicate with large groups of people over a mobile network Use Cases: a. CGSwara used to bring news to rural Indian communities 2014: see here b. Governance Pour Le Mobile: A 2009-2012 UNDP funded mobile based initiative to collect youth input and encourage civic engagement in Madagascar: see here c. FrontlineSMS used during the 2011 Nigerian elections: see here 3. Gaining Situational Awareness A. Find My Friends: A location-based mobile app that helps reconnect people with their friends during protests and in other unstable environments Use Case: a. Currently being used in Ukraine and Venezuela: see here B. Check-In Tools: Location-based social networking services that allow people to engage with other likely supporters based on their similar locations Examples: a. Ushahidi “Check-In”: see here b. Foursquare: see here C. Ushahidi: A crowdsourcing software used to monitor elections and map crisis information a. Used to map the 2011 Egyptian and Libyan crises: see here b. Project Crowdmap 1. Syria Tracker: A crisis mapping system that collects citizen reports on human rights violations and casualties in Syria since April 2011: see here c. The Guardian report: Ushahidi: Giving Citizens the Power to Put News On the Map (August 2010) D. Network Mapper: A Google project that visually maps out the connections between activist individuals and groups to improve understanding of the affiliations and key nodes of influence between them Use Case: a. 2011 Government leadership defection mapping in Syria: see here 4. Accessing the Internet Privately and Securely A. Secure and anonymous browsing: Examples: a. Tor: Free software for enabling online anonymity used by activists subject to government spying 1. Used across the region during the 2011 Arab Spring to circumvent internet censorship: see here b. Orbot: A free proxy app created by the Guardian Project that empowers other apps to use the internet more securely; it uses Tor to encrypt Internet traffic and then hides it by bouncing through a series of computers around the world c. Orweb: a private web browser (by the Guardian Project) that evades tracking and censorship by bouncing one’s encrypted traffic several times through computers around the world B. Secure online messaging Example: a. ChatSecure: A free, private, and secure platform to message activists over Facebook Chat, Google Talk, and Google hangouts compatible with Android, iPhone, Mac, Linux or PC C. Virtual Private Networks (VPNs): Offer activists internet anonymity by enabling them to send and receive data across shared public networks as though they were directly connected to a private network Use Cases and Examples: a. Lantern software currently being used in China to avoid internet censorship: see here b. uProxy: A browser extension that lets users share alternative more secure routes to the Internet; it helps users protect each other from third parties who may try to watch, block, or redirect users’ Internet connections c. HotSpot Shield 1. 2014 Venezuelan protests in opposition to the government: see here 2. November 2013 Ukrainian protests against President Yanukovych: see here 3. June 2013 Turkish protests to contest the urban development plan for Istanbul’s Taksim Gezi Park: see here 4. Interview with the founder: see here c. Other: June 2013 Turkish protests to contest the urban development plan for Istanbul’s Taksim Gezi Park: see here .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • What Is Threat Hunting?
    $whoami ◎ Apurv Singh Gautam (@ASG_Sc0rpi0n) ◎ Security Researcher, Threat Intel/Hunting ◎ Cybersecurity @ Georgia Tech ◎ Prior: Research Intern at ICSI, UC Berkeley ◎ Hobbies ◎ Contributing to the security community ◎ Gaming/Streaming (Rainbow 6 Siege) ◎ Hiking, Lockpicking ◎ Social ◎ Twitter - @ASG_Sc0rpi0n ◎ Website – https://apurvsinghgautam.me 2 Agenda ◎ Introduction to the Dark Web ◎ Why hunting on the Dark Web? ◎ Methods to hunt on the Dark Web ◎ Can the Dark Web hunting be automated? ◎ Overall Picture ◎ OpSec? What’s that? ◎ Conclusion 3 Clear Web? Deep Web? Dark Web? 5 Image Source: UC San Diego Library Accessing the Dark Web ◎ Tor /I2P/ZeroNet ◎ .onion domains/.i2p domains ◎ Traffic through relays Image Sources: Hotspot Shield, Tor Project, I2P Project, ZeroNet 6 What’s all the Hype? ◎ Hype ○ Vast and mysterious part of the Internet ○ Place for cybercriminals only ○ Illegal to access the Dark Web ◎ Reality ○ Few reachable onion domains ○ Uptime isn’t ideal ○ Useful for free expression in few countries ○ Popular sites like Facebook, NYTimes, etc. ○ Legal to access the Dark Web 7 Relevant site types? ◎ General Markets ◎ PII & PHI ◎ Credit Cards ◎ Digital identities ◎ Information Trading ◎ Remote Access ◎ Personal Documents ◎ Electronic Wallets ◎ Insider Threats Image Source: Intsights 8 Sites Examples 9 Cost of products? ◎ SSN - $1 ◎ Fake FB with 15 friends - $1 ◎ DDoS Service - $7/hr ◎ Rent a Hacker - $12/hr ◎ Credit Card - $20+ ◎ Mobile Malware - $150 ◎ Bank Details - $1000+ ◎ Exploits or 0-days - $150,000+ ◎ Critical databases - $300,000+ 10 Product Examples 11 Image Source: Digital Shadows 12 Image Source: Digital Shadows 13 What is Threat Hunting? ◎ Practice of proactively searching for cyber threats ◎ Hypothesis-based approach ◎ Uses advanced analytics and machine learning investigations ◎ Proactive and iterative search 15 Why So Serious (Eh! Important)? ◎ Hacker forums, darknet markets, dump shops, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • An Investigation Into the Security and Privacy of Ios VPN Applications
    An Investigation Into the Security and Privacy of iOS VPN Applications Jack Wilson Division of Cybersecurity School of Design and Informatics Abertay University, Dundee A thesis submitted for the degree of Bachelor of Science with Honours in Ethical Hacking 1st May 2018 Word Count: 11,448 Abstract Due to the increasing number of recommendations for people to use VPN’s for privacy reasons, more app developers are creating VPN apps and publishing them on the Apple App Store and Google Play Store. In this ‘gold rush’, apps are being developed quickly and, in turn, not being developed with security fully in mind. This paper investigated a selection of free VPN applications available on the Apple App Store (for iOS devices) and test the apps for security and privacy. This includes testing for any traffic being transmitted over plain HTTP, DNS leakage and transmission of personally-identifiable information (such as phone number, IMEI 1, email address, MAC address) and evaluating the security of the tunnelling protocol used by the VPN. The testing methodology involved installing free VPN apps on a test device (an iPhone 6 running iOS 11), simulating network traffic for a pre-defined period of time and capturing the traffic (either through ARP spoofing, or through a proxy program such as Burpsuite). This allows for all traffic to be analysed to check for anything being sent without encryption. Other issues that often cause de-anonymisation with VPN applications such as DNS leakage can be tested using websites such as dnsleaktest.com. The research found several common security issues with the VPN applications that were tested, with a large majority of the applications tested failing to implement HTTPS.
    [Show full text]
  • User Guide Contents
    USER GUIDE CONTENTS What's new 4 About Magnet OUTRIDER 5 Getting started with Magnet OUTRIDER 6 System requirements 6 Use Magnet OUTRIDER on a dongle 6 Use a trial license of Magnet OUTRIDER 6 Understanding changes made to the system 7 Detecting Bitlocker encrypted drives 8 Scanning a target 9 Scan a computer 9 Encryption screening 9 Scan an external drive 10 Scan a folder 10 Configuring scan options 11 Locate files and apps settings 11 Collect artifacts and scan browser history settings 13 CSAM Detection Technology settings 14 Scan options 15 Reporting options 16 Miscellaneous options 16 Adding keywords and NCMEC report data to a search 17 Import a keyword list or NCMEC report data 17 View a keyword list or NCMEC report data 17 Export a keyword list or NCMEC report data 18 Reviewing scan results 19 Mark a CRC CSAM hit as a false positive 19 Starting a new scan 20 Supported application categories 20 Viewing and exporting scan reports 22 View scan reports 22 Navigating your scan report folder 22 Contents of scan reports 23 View and export an error list 23 Exporting filename keyword hits and CRC CSAM hits 25 Export filename keyword hits or CRC CSAM hits 25 Export a list of saved hits 25 Updating Magnet OUTRIDER 27 Update Magnet OUTRIDER manually 27 Automatically check for updates 27 User Guide WHAT'S NEW VERSION DESCRIPTION 2.1.0 l Updated Configuring scan options with information about scanning connected networks, new supported operating system artifacts, and customizing case and report locations. 2.0.0 l Updated Reviewing scan results with information about new supported apps.
    [Show full text]
  • Threat Modeling and Circumvention of Internet Censorship by David Fifield
    Threat modeling and circumvention of Internet censorship By David Fifield A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Computer Science in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor J.D. Tygar, Chair Professor Deirdre Mulligan Professor Vern Paxson Fall 2017 1 Abstract Threat modeling and circumvention of Internet censorship by David Fifield Doctor of Philosophy in Computer Science University of California, Berkeley Professor J.D. Tygar, Chair Research on Internet censorship is hampered by poor models of censor behavior. Censor models guide the development of circumvention systems, so it is important to get them right. A censor model should be understood not just as a set of capabilities|such as the ability to monitor network traffic—but as a set of priorities constrained by resource limitations. My research addresses the twin themes of modeling and circumvention. With a grounding in empirical research, I build up an abstract model of the circumvention problem and examine how to adapt it to concrete censorship challenges. I describe the results of experiments on censors that probe their strengths and weaknesses; specifically, on the subject of active probing to discover proxy servers, and on delays in their reaction to changes in circumvention. I present two circumvention designs: domain fronting, which derives its resistance to blocking from the censor's reluctance to block other useful services; and Snowflake, based on quickly changing peer-to-peer proxy servers. I hope to change the perception that the circumvention problem is a cat-and-mouse game that affords only incremental and temporary advancements.
    [Show full text]
  • Best VPN Services in 2017 (Speed, Cost & Usability Reviews)
    10/8/2017 Best VPN Services in 2017 (Speed, Cost & Usability Reviews) Best VPN Services VPN Reviews & In-Depth Comparisons Brad Smith Sep 18, 2017 With the help of John & Andrey (https://thebestvpn.com/contact-us/), we’ve put together a list of best VPNs. We compared their download/upload speed, support, usability, cost, servers, countries and features. We also analyzed their TOS to see if they keep logs or not and whether they allow P2P and work with Netflix. here’s a link to the spreadsheet (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/11IZdVCBjVvbdaKx2HKz2hKB4F Z_l8nRJXXubX4FaQj4/) You want to start using a VPN, but don’t know which software/service to use? In this page, we’ve reviewed 30+ most popular VPN services (on going process). In order to find out which are best VPNs, we spent some time on research and speed testing: 1. Installed 30+ VPN software on our personal devices, such as Windows, Mac, Android and iOS and compared their usability. 2. Performed Download/Upload speed tests on speedtest.net to see which had best performing servers. 3. Double checked if they work with Netflix and allow P2P. 4. Read their TOS to verify if they keep logs or not. 5. Compared security (encryption and protocols). That means we’ve dug through a large number of privacy policies (on logging), checked their features, speed, customer support and usability. If you know a good VPN provider that is not listed here, please contact us and we’ll test it out as soon as possible. 5 Best VPNs for Online Privacy and Security Here are the top 5 VPN services of 2017 after our research, analysis, monitoring, testing, and verifying.
    [Show full text]
  • A Privacy Threat for Internet Users in Internet-Censoring Countries
    A Privacy Threat for Internet Users in Internet-censoring Countries Feno Heriniaina R. College of Computer Science, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China Keywords: Censorship, Human Computer Interaction, Privacy, Virtual Private Networks. Abstract: Online surveillance has been increasingly used by different governments to control the spread of information on the Internet. The magnitude of this activity differs widely and is based primarily on the areas that are deemed, by the state, to be critical. Aside from the use of keywords and the complete domain name filtering technologies, Internet censorship can sometimes even use the total blocking of IP addresses to censor content. Despite the advances, in terms of technology used for Internet censorship, there are also different types of circumvention tools that are available to the general public. In this paper, we report the results of our investigation on how migrants who previously had access to the open Internet behave toward Internet censorship when subjected to it. Four hundred and thirty-two (432) international students took part in the study that lasted two years. We identified the most common circumvention tools that are utilized by the foreign students in China. We investigated the usability of these tools and monitored the way in which they are used. We identified a behaviour-based privacy threat that puts the users of circumvention tools at risk while they live in an Internet-censoring country. We also recommend the use of a user-oriented filtering method, which should be considered as part of the censoring system, as it enhances the performance of the screening process and recognizes the real needs of its users.
    [Show full text]
  • VPN Report 2020
    VPN Report 2020 www.av-comparatives.org Independent Tests of Anti-Virus Software VPN - Virtual Private Network 35 VPN services put to test LANGUAGE : ENGLISH LAST REVISION : 20 TH MAY 2020 WWW.AV-COMPARATIVES.ORG 1 VPN Report 2020 www.av-comparatives.org Contents Introduction 4 What is a VPN? 4 Why use a VPN? 4 Vague Privacy 5 Potential Risks 5 The Relevance of No-Logs Policies 6 Using VPNs to Spoof Geolocation 6 Test Procedure 7 Lab Setup 7 Test Methodology 7 Leak Test 7 Kill-Switch Test 8 Performance Test 8 Tested Products 9 Additional Product Information 10 Consolidations & Collaborations 10 Supported Protocols 11 Logging 12 Payment Information 14 Test Results 17 Leak & Kill-Switch Tests 17 Performance Test 19 Download speed 20 Upload speed 21 Latency 22 Performance Overview 24 Discussion 25 General Security Observations 25 Test Results 25 Logging & Privacy Policies 26 Further Recommendations 27 2 VPN Report 2020 www.av-comparatives.org Individual VPN Product Reviews 28 Avast SecureLine VPN 29 AVG Secure VPN 31 Avira Phantom VPN 33 Bitdefender VPN 35 BullGuard VPN 37 CyberGhost VPN 39 ExpressVPN 41 F-Secure Freedome 43 hide.me VPN 45 HMA VPN 47 Hotspot Shield 49 IPVanish 51 Ivacy 53 Kaspersky Secure Connection 55 McAfee Safe Connect 57 mySteganos Online Shield VPN 59 Norton Secure VPN 63 Panda Dome VPN 65 Private Internet Access 67 Private Tunnel 69 PrivateVPN 71 ProtonVPN 73 PureVPN 75 SaferVPN 77 StrongVPN 79 Surfshark 81 TorGuard 83 Trust.Zone VPN 85 TunnelBear 87 VPNSecure 89 VPN Unlimited 91 VyprVPN 93 Windscribe 95 ZenMate VPN 97 Copyright and Disclaimer 99 3 VPN Report 2020 www.av-comparatives.org Introduction The aim of this test is to compare VPN services for consumers in a real-world environment by assessing their security and privacy features, along with download speed, upload speed, and latency.
    [Show full text]
  • Blocking-Resistant Communication Through Domain Fronting
    Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies 2015; 2015 (2):46–64 David Fifield*, Chang Lan, Rod Hynes, Percy Wegmann, and Vern Paxson Blocking-resistant communication through domain fronting Abstract: We describe “domain fronting,” a versatile 1 Introduction censorship circumvention technique that hides the re- mote endpoint of a communication. Domain fronting Censorship is a daily reality for many Internet users. works at the application layer, using HTTPS, to com- Workplaces, schools, and governments use technical and municate with a forbidden host while appearing to com- social means to prevent access to information by the net- municate with some other host, permitted by the cen- work users under their control. In response, those users sor. The key idea is the use of different domain names at employ technical and social means to gain access to the different layers of communication. One domain appears forbidden information. We have seen an ongoing conflict on the “outside” of an HTTPS request—in the DNS re- between censor and censored, with advances on both quest and TLS Server Name Indication—while another sides, more subtle evasion countered by more powerful domain appears on the “inside”—in the HTTP Host detection. header, invisible to the censor under HTTPS encryp- Circumventors, at a natural disadvantage because tion. A censor, unable to distinguish fronted and non- the censor controls the network, have a point working fronted traffic to a domain, must choose between allow- in their favor: the censor’s distaste for “collateral dam- ing circumvention traffic and blocking the domain en- age,” incidental overblocking committed in the course of tirely, which results in expensive collateral damage.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Media Censorship: Evidence from a Field Experiment in China
    The Impact of Media Censorship: Evidence from a Field Experiment in China Yuyu Chen David Y. Yang* January 4, 2018 — JOB MARKET PAPER — — CLICK HERE FOR LATEST VERSION — Abstract Media censorship is a hallmark of authoritarian regimes. We conduct a field experiment in China to measure the effects of providing citizens with access to an uncensored Internet. We track subjects’ me- dia consumption, beliefs regarding the media, economic beliefs, political attitudes, and behaviors over 18 months. We find four main results: (i) free access alone does not induce subjects to acquire politically sen- sitive information; (ii) temporary encouragement leads to a persistent increase in acquisition, indicating that demand is not permanently low; (iii) acquisition brings broad, substantial, and persistent changes to knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and intended behaviors; and (iv) social transmission of information is statis- tically significant but small in magnitude. We calibrate a simple model to show that the combination of low demand for uncensored information and the moderate social transmission means China’s censorship apparatus may remain robust to a large number of citizens receiving access to an uncensored Internet. Keywords: censorship, information, media, belief JEL classification: D80, D83, L86, P26 *Chen: Guanghua School of Management, Peking University. Email: [email protected]. Yang: Department of Economics, Stanford University. Email: [email protected]. Yang is deeply grateful to Ran Abramitzky, Matthew Gentzkow, and Muriel Niederle
    [Show full text]
  • Download and Install a New Trusted Root Certificate in Order to Connect to ~250 Foreign Web Sites
    The Information Safety & Capacity (ISC) Project FINAL REPORT 2011-2020 Submitted to: USAID/DCHA Submitted by: Counterpart International DISCLAIMER: This publication was produced by Counterpart International for review by the United States Agency for International Development under Cooperative Agreement AID-OAA-LA-11-00008 and Leader Cooperative Agreement Number: FD-A-00-09-00141-00. The authors’ views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. 2 The ISC Project Final Report Table of Contents 04 Executive Summary 20 Locally Created Resources and Tools 04 Introduction 20 Technology Development 05 Achievements & Milestones 22 Investment in Technology 06 Investing in Trust 22 Technology Support Grants: 2013 06 Initial Threats and Fixes 24 Technology Support Grants: 2016 06 State Actors and Suppression 24 Technology Support Grants: 2018 07 Looking Ahead 24 Technology Support Grants: 2019 08 Part One: ISC Project Vision and Strategy 25 Technology Support Grants: 2020 08 The Importance of Cybersecurity in Civil Society 26 Cyber Policy Support 09 Global Threats and Trends: Old and New 26 Internet Freedom Landscape 09 Cybersecurity Threats in the Beginning 27 Design Principles for Internet Freedom Support 10 Evolution of Threats Through Technological 28 Internet Governance and Internet Freedom: 2017- Innovation 2019 Awardees 11 The ISC Project’s Network of Digital Security 30 Internet Freedom Policy Advocacy: 2020 Specialists Awardees
    [Show full text]
  • Online Security for Independent Media and Civil Society Activists
    Online Security for Independent Media and Civil Society Activists A white paper for SIDA’s October 2010 “Exile Media” conference Eric S Johnson (updated 13 Oct 2013) For activists who make it a priority to deliver news to citizens of countries which try to control the information to which their citizens have access, the internet has provided massive new opportunities. But those countries’ governments also realise ICTs’ potential and implement countermeasures to impede the delivery of independent news via the internet. This paper covers what exile media can or should do to protect itself, addressing three categories of issues: common computer security precautions, defense against targeted attacks, and circumventing cybercensorship, with a final note about overkill (aka FUD: fear, uncertainty, doubt). For each of the issues mentioned below, specific ex- amples from within the human rights or freedom of expression world can be provided where non-observance was cata- strophic, but most of those who suffered problems would rather not be named. [NB Snowden- gate changed little or nothing about these recommendations.] Common computer security: The best defense is a good … (aka “lock your doors”) The main threats to exile media’s successful use of ICTs—and solutions—are the same as for any other computer user: 1) Ensure all software automatically patches itself regularly against newly-discovered secu- rity flaws (e.g. to maintain up-to-date SSL certificate revocation lists). As with antivirus software, this may cost something; e.g. with Microsoft (Windows and Office), it may re- quire your software be legally purchased (or use the WSUS Offline Update tool, which helps in low-bandwidth environments).
    [Show full text]
  • Internet Censorship in Thailand: User Practices and Potential Threats
    Internet Censorship in Thailand: User Practices and Potential Threats Genevieve Gebhart∗†1, Anonymous Author 2, Tadayoshi Kohno† ∗Electronic Frontier Foundation †University of Washington [email protected] [email protected] 1 Abstract—The “cat-and-mouse” game of Internet censorship security community has proposed novel circumvention and circumvention cannot be won by capable technology methods in response [10, 25, 38]. alone. Instead, that technology must be available, The goal of circumventing censorship and attaining freer comprehensible, and trustworthy to users. However, the field access to information, however, relies on those largely focuses only on censors and the technical means to circumvent them. Thailand, with its superlatives in Internet circumvention methods being available, comprehensible, use and government information controls, offers a rich case and trustworthy to users. Only by meeting users’ needs can study for exploring users’ assessments of and interactions with circumvention tools realize their full technical capabilities. censorship. We survey 229 and interview 13 Internet users in With this goal in mind, the field lacks sufficient inquiry Thailand, and report on their current practices, experienced into the range of user perceptions of and interactions with and perceived threats, and unresolved problems regarding censorship. How do users assess censored content? What is censorship and digital security. Our findings indicate that the range of their reactions when they encounter existing circumvention tools were adequate for respondents to censorship? How does censorship affect the way they not access blocked information; that respondents relied to some only access but also produce information? extent on risky tool selection and inaccurate assessment of blocked content; and that attempts to take action with In addition to guiding more thorough anti-circumvention sensitive content on social media led to the most concrete strategies, these questions about users and censorship can threats with the least available technical defenses.
    [Show full text]