Food Security & Livelihoods Assessment Kaabong & Moroto, Karamoja August – September 2008

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Food Security & Livelihoods Assessment Kaabong & Moroto, Karamoja August – September 2008 September 2008 Updated Version May 2009 Food Security & Livelihoods Assessment Kaabong & Moroto, Karamoja August – September 2008 CONTENTS 1. BACKGROUND ................................................................................ 9 2. OBJECTIVES & METHODOLOGY ......................................................... 11 2.1 Location ................................................................................. 11 2.2 Data Collection Methods .............................................................. 12 2.3 Data Analysis ............................................................................ 13 3. ANALYSIS .................................................................................... 13 3.1 Livelihood Systems ..................................................................... 13 3.2 Livestock Production .................................................................. 16 3.3 Crop Production ........................................................................ 19 3.4 Markets .................................................................................. 21 3.5 Wealth Groups .......................................................................... 23 3.6 Changes in Household Food Sources ................................................ 24 3.7 Changes in Household Income Sources ............................................. 25 3.8 Changes in Household Expenditure .................................................. 26 3.9 Changes in Household Coping Strategies ........................................... 27 4. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................. 29 APPENDIX FIGURES Figure 1. Karamoja Map and ACF Programme Areas ................................................ 9 Figure 2. Karamoja Ethnic Groupings ................................................................ 10 Figure 3. Assessment Locations ....................................................................... 12 Figure 4. Livelihood Zones of Uganda ................................................................ 13 Figure 5. Uganda Seasonality ......................................................................... 14 Figure 6. Land Tenure Terminology .................................................................. 16 Figure 7. Hazard Ranking .............................................................................. 16 Figure 8. Diseases Threatening Livestock Production ............................................. 18 Figure 9. Herd Migration Dynamics ................................................................... 18 Figure 10. Threats to Agricultural Production ...................................................... 20 Figure 11. Pests Threatening Agricultural Production ............................................ 20 Figure 12. Average Retail Prices of Commodities .................................................. 21 Figure 13. Average Retail Prices of Animal Products .............................................. 21 Figure 14. Average Retail Prices of Livestock ...................................................... 22 Figure 15. Reasons for Price Fluctuations ........................................................... 23 Figure 16. Market Access .............................................................................. 23 Figure 17. Wealth Group Breakdown ................................................................. 24 Figure 18. Changes in Food Sources by Wealth Group ............................................ 24 Figure 19. Changes in Income Sources by Wealth Group ......................................... 25 Figure 20. Changes in Expenditure by Wealth Group .............................................. 27 Figure 21. Changes in Coping Strategies by Wealth Group ....................................... 28 ACF Karamoja Assessment - 2 - August-September 2008 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Karamoja region is located in the Northeast corner of Uganda and administratively divided into five districts: Abim, Kaabong, Kotido, Moroto, and Nakapiripirit. Karamoja lies roughly between 1-40 latitude and 33-350 longitude, and covers an area of approximately 30,000 square kilometres. It is bordered in the East by Turkana and West Pokot districts of Kenya and in the North by Sudan. The total population of the region is estimated at around one million, which constitutes roughly 4% of the total Uganda population.1 Karamoja is the least populated area of Uganda, with only 35 people per square kilometre. The region is classified as semi-arid by Ugandan standards, and the high variability in temporal and spatial distribution of rain is the determining factor that influences livelihood strategies. Agro- pastoralism is the dominant livelihood system of the region. The livestock production system integrates seasonal movement of herds between wet and dry season grazing lands. Cereals such as sorghum, millet and maize are also cultivated during the wet season and contribute to the household production and economy. Due to its inherent risk minimisation, agro-pastoralism is an appropriate livelihood system in semi-arid lands, particularly livestock which are more resilient to seasonal inconsistencies than crops. Traditionally, livestock raiding with small handheld weapons like spears and sticks was practiced between (and usually not among) different clans for socioeconomic reasons such as asset creation, dowry, or expression of manhood. Raiding was sanctioned by elders and the intensity, frequency, and fatality were limited. The practice has however changed shape in the recent past and today is among the main reasons for disrupted household livelihoods. The proliferation of small arms and light weapons (SALW) into the area from neighbouring Sudan, Kenya, and to a lesser extent Ethiopia and Somalia has fuelled the conflict.2 Armed Karamojong repeatedly raided these regions and planted the seed for today’s mistrust and animosity between these different ethnic groups. All human development indices show that Karamoja is one of the least developed parts of the country. Socioeconomic infrastructure and services such as schools, health centres, potable drinking water, roads, and production, processing, and marketing facilities are weak. Approximately 82% of the Karamoja population lives in poverty (defined as less than US$1/day), compared to the national average of 31%; global acute malnutrition (GAM) is 11% versus a national average of 6%.3 Many sources indicate historical marginalisation, misguided pastoral policies, and a lack of development programmes as the major causes of the region’s tenacious poverty and conflict. A number of humanitarian and development actors are implementing programmes in nutrition, food security, water and sanitation, and relief distribution; the World Food Programme (WFP) is distributing food aid for an estimated 700,000 people considered highly food insecure (of the roughly one million people in the region). ACF was first operational in Karamoja during the severe drought and emergency response of 1980- 1983. Following a needs assessment conducted in late 2007, ACF committed itself to continue feeding programmes formerly established by MSF Spain during their emergency response. Food security and livelihood (FSL) programming is also envisaged for 2009 to complement the core nutrition work in order to address underlying factors of malnutrition in Karamoja. Hence, a food security and livelihoods (FSL) assessment was initiated to define FSL priorities and provide guidance for subsequent responses. A total of thirteen sub-counties were assessed by ACF in Kaabong and Moroto districts within a two week period in August 2008. The assessment primarily focused on the status of household food security and livelihoods, with supplementary but limited data collection on nutrition, water, sanitation, and hygiene4 in Kaabong and Moroto districts of Karamoja. This resulting report attempts to elaborate shifts in household food and income sources, coping strategies, performance of crop and livestock production. 1 OCHA-OPM (Office of the Prime Minister) Joint Fact sheet on Karamoja: Humanitarian and Development Realities in the Region, 18 April 2008. 2 Mkutu (2008) Guns and Governance in the Rift Valley: pastoralist conflict and small arms. Indiana University Press. 3 The statistics in this paragraph are from UNOCHA (OPM) 2008, op cit. 4 Internal analysis of nutrition, water, sanitation, and hygiene data for which WASH findings are summarised in the Appendices. ACF Karamoja Assessment - 3 - August-September 2008 Primary and secondary data were collected at district, community, and household (wealth group) levels. Focus group discussions with community elders were conducted in two stages, first to establish specific wealth group criteria for households. Secondly, in-depth discussions were conducted regarding the various community based aspects, for example land tenure system, adaptive strategies, challenges and opportunities of different wealth groups, and priority areas of interventions. A total 190 household representative interviews were conducted using structured questionnaires. The interviews achieved fair representations of gender and age. Key informant interviews were conducted with officials from district and sub-county administrations, district agriculture, livestock, and fishery departments, staff of different NGOs and agro-pastoral civil society groups of Karamoja. In total 15 key informant interviews were conducted using checklists and semi-structured questionnaires. An additional 40 interviews
Recommended publications
  • Uganda 2015 Human Rights Report
    UGANDA 2015 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Uganda is a constitutional republic led since 1986 by President Yoweri Museveni of the ruling National Resistance Movement (NRM) party. Voters re-elected Museveni to a fourth five-year term and returned an NRM majority to the unicameral Parliament in 2011. While the election marked an improvement over previous elections, it was marred by irregularities. Civilian authorities generally maintained effective control over the security forces. The three most serious human rights problems in the country included: lack of respect for the integrity of the person (unlawful killings, torture, and other abuse of suspects and detainees); restrictions on civil liberties (freedoms of assembly, expression, the media, and association); and violence and discrimination against marginalized groups, such as women (sexual and gender-based violence), children (sexual abuse and ritual killing), persons with disabilities, and the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LGBTI) community. Other human rights problems included harsh prison conditions, arbitrary and politically motivated arrest and detention, lengthy pretrial detention, restrictions on the right to a fair trial, official corruption, societal or mob violence, trafficking in persons, and child labor. Although the government occasionally took steps to punish officials who committed abuses, whether in the security services or elsewhere, impunity was a problem. Section 1. Respect for the Integrity of the Person, Including Freedom from: a. Arbitrary or Unlawful Deprivation of Life There were several reports the government or its agents committed arbitrary or unlawful killings. On September 8, media reported security forces in Apaa Parish in the north shot and killed five persons during a land dispute over the government’s border demarcation.
    [Show full text]
  • Karamoja and Northern Uganda Comparative Analysis of Livelihood Recovery in the Post-Conflict Periods November 2019
    Karamoja and Northern Uganda Comparative analysis of livelihood recovery in the post-conflict periods November 2019 Karamoja and Northern Uganda Comparative analysis of livelihood recovery in the post-conflict periods November 2019 Published by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and Tufts University Rome, 2019 REQUIRED CITATION FAO and Tufts University. 2019. Comparative analysis of livelihood recovery in the post-conflict periods – Karamoja and Northern Uganda. November 2019. Rome. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) or Tufts University concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO or the University in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO or the University. ISBN 978-92-5-131747-1 (FAO) ©FAO and Tufts University, 2019 Some rights reserved. This work is made available under the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo/legalcode/legalcode). Under the terms of this licence, this work may be copied, redistributed and adapted for non-commercial purposes, provided that the work is appropriately cited.
    [Show full text]
  • Uganda Humanitarian Update
    UGANDA HUMANITARIAN UPDATE MAY – JUNE 2010 I. HIGHLIGHTS AMID HEAVY RAINS, HUMANITARIAN ACCESS IN PARTS OF KARAMOJA AND TESO HAMPERED BY DETERIORATING ROAD CONDITIONS OVER 1,000 CHOLERA CASES REGISTERED IN KARAMOJA SINCE APRIL 2010 90% OF IDPS IN NORTHERN UGANDA NO LONGER LIVING IN CAMPS, BUT LAND CONFLICTS AND LANDMINES IMPEDING RETURN IN SOME AREAS II. SECURITY AND ACCESS SECURITY The general situation in Karamoja remained fragile, according to the United Nations Department for Safety and Security (UNDSS). Cattle raids, including on protected kraals, particularly affected Moroto and Kotido, with some resulting in fierce clashes between the Uganda People’s Defence Forces and the raiders. In South Karamoja incidents associated with food distributions involved theft of food and non-food items (NFIs), and attacks on food distributors as well as on food recipients. Following three road ambushes in Alerek sub-county of Abim District during the month, UNDSS issued an advisory limiting UN movement along the Abim-Kotido road to between 09.00Hrs and 16.00Hrs with effect from 28 June 2010. Three civilians were killed in one of those ambushes. In northern Uganda, Amuru District officials and partners carried out a joint assessment in the wake of a violent land dispute that occurred in Koli village of Pabbo sub-county on 23 June. Preliminary findings indicated that one person was killed and several others injured in the dispute involving two clans. Some 40 huts were torched and many members of either clan had fled the village. Also of concern in the region during the reporting period were raids by illegally armed Karamojong, particularly in Pader District.
    [Show full text]
  • What's New in 2003?
    Public Health Service Centers for Disease Control DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES and Prevention (CDC) Memorandum Date: February 21, 2003 From: WHO Collaborating Center for Research, Training and Eradication of Dracunculiasis Subject: GUINEA WORM WRAP-UP #130 To: Addressees What’s New in 2003? UGANDA INTERRUPTS GW TRANSMISSION IN RECORD TIME? Uganda's Guinea Worm Eradication Program reported only 7 indigenous cases in 7 endemic villages, and 18 cases imported from Sudan during 2002. Eighteen (76%) of the 24 cases were reportedly contained - all in case containment centers. Thus, the indigenous case reported in Lorukumo village of Moroto District in December 2002 might be the final instance of indigenously transmitted dracunculiasis in Uganda. That patient, a 48-year-old woman, was confined in a local hospital from the swelling stage until the worm was completely removed. If no indigenous cases are reported in 2003, Uganda will become the first endemic country to interrupt transmission since Chad reported its last case in 1998. This is a remarkably rapid achievement for the Ugandan program, which recorded 126,639 cases in 2,677 endemic villages of 16 districts during its national case search in 1991-1992 (figure 1). Most cases (94.9%) were located in only three contiguous districts (Kitgum, Kotido, Moroto) in the northeast of the country (figure 2). Before the national village-by-village search, which was one of the last to be conducted among the endemic countries, Uganda had reported only 1,960 and 1,309 cases for the entire country in 1988 and 1989, Figure 1 respectively. When Uganda reported 42,852 cases of NUMBER OF CASES OF DRACUNCULIASIS REPORTED SINCE 1992 IN UGANDA dracunculiasis in 1993, it ranked as the second- AND YEAR OF INTRDUCTION OF INTERVENTIONS AND STRATEGIES highest endemic country, exceeded only by Nigeria (75,752 cases), and followed by Niger 10000000 (21,564) and Ghana (17,918).
    [Show full text]
  • UNICEF Uganda End-Of-Year Humanitarian Situation Report
    Uganda Country Office Humanitarian Situation Report No. 5 UNICEF/UNI3255804/Abdul © Reporting Period: May 2020 Situation in Numbers Highlights • As of 31 May, Uganda had a cumulative total of 457 COVID-19 cases, including 2.12 million 73 recoveries and zero deaths. Seven new cases among health care workers # of children in need of were confirmed during this reporting period. Uganda has tested a cumulative humanitarian assistance 96,825 individuals for COVID-19 since the beginning of the outbreak. (UNICEF HAC 2020) • 923,994 people (463,845 female) were reached with key messages on the prevention and control of COVID-19 in May. • On 4 May, Moroto District confirmed its first cholera outbreak since 2016. 3.48 million # of people in need • 39,214 people were reached with sufficient quantities of water for drinking, cooking and personal hygiene. (UNICEF HAC 2020) • Flooding displaced 24,335 people, according to the Office of the Prime Minister, while affecting 176,620 people through the destruction of homes, crops and 840,380 infrastructure and the disruption of livelihood activities. # of refugees and asylum- • 353,833 women and children (176,209 male, 177,624 female) were reached seekers who are children with essential health care services during the reporting period. • Since April 2020, 499,929 primary caregivers of children (248,965 male, 250,964 female) were reached with infant and young child feeding (IYCF) 1.42 million counselling through facilities and community platforms. # of total refugees and • 61,625 children (30,689 boys, 30,936 girls) were reached with home- asylum-seekers (OPM, Pro based/distance learning to ensure continuity of learning as of May 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Sironko District
    National Population and Housing Census 2014 Area Specific Profiles Sironko District April 2017 National Population and Housing Census 2014 Area Specific Profiles – Sironko District This report presents findings of National Population and Housing Census (NPHC) 2014 undertaken by the Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS). Additional information about the Census may be obtained from the UBOS Head Office, Statistics House. Plot 9 Colville Street, P. O. Box 7186, Kampala, Uganda; Telephone: +256-414 706000 Fax: +256-414 237553; E-mail: [email protected]; Website: www.ubos.org Cover Photos: Uganda Bureau of Statistics Recommended Citation Uganda Bureau of Statistics 2017, The National Population and Housing Census 2014 – Area Specific Profile Series, Kampala, Uganda. FOREWORD Demographic and socio-economic data are useful for planning and evidence-based decision making in any country. Such data are collected through Population Censuses, Demographic and Socio-economic Surveys, Civil Registration Systems and other Administrative sources. In Uganda, however, the Population and Housing Census remains the main source of demographic data, especially at the sub-national level. Population Census taking in Uganda dates back to 1911 and since then the country has undertaken five such Censuses. The most recent, the National Population and Housing Census 2014, was undertaken under the theme ‘Counting for Planning and Improved Service Delivery’. The enumeration for the 2014 Census was conducted in August/September 2014. The Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS) worked closely with different Government Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs) as well as Local Governments (LGs) to undertake the census exercise. The 2014 census provides several statistics on different aspects of the population.
    [Show full text]
  • Karamoja Rapid Crop and Food Security Assessment
    KARAMOJA RAPID CROP AND FOOD SECURITY ASSESSMENT KAMPALA, AUGUST 2013 This Rapid Assessment was conducted by: World Food Programme (WFP) - Elliot Vhurumuku; Hamidu Tusiime; Eunice Twanza; Alex Ogenrwoth; Swaleh Gule; James Odong; and Joseph Ndawula Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) - Bernard Onzima; Joseph Egabu; Paddy Namurebire; and Michael Lokiru Office of the Prime Minister (OPM) - Johnson Oworo; Timothy Ojwi; Jimmy Ogwang; and Catherine Nakalembe Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries (MAAIF) - James Obo; and Stephen Kataama Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 2 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 3 1.1. Background .............................................................................................................................. 3 1.2. Objectives ................................................................................................................................ 4 1.3. Methodology ........................................................................................................................... 4 1.3.1. Sampling methodology .................................................................................................... 4 1.3.2. Selection of respondents ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • List of URA Service Offices Callcenter Toll Free Line: 0800117000 Email: [email protected] Facebook: @Urapage Twitter: @Urauganda
    List of URA Service Offices Callcenter Toll free line: 0800117000 Email: [email protected] Facebook: @URApage Twitter: @URAuganda CENTRAL REGION ( Kampala, Wakiso, Entebbe, Mukono) s/n Station Location Tax Heads URA Head URA Tower , plot M 193/4 Nakawa Industrial Ara, 1 Domestic Taxes/Customs Office P.O. Box 7279, Kampala 2 Katwe Branch Finance Trust Bank, Plot No 115 & 121. Domestic Taxes 3 Bwaise Branch Diamond Trust Bank,Bombo Road Domestic Taxes 4 William Street Post Bank, Plot 68/70 Domestic Taxes Nakivubo 5 Diamond Trust Bank,Ham Shopping Domestic Taxes Branch United Bank of Africa- Aponye Hotel Building Plot 6 William Street Domestic Taxes 17 7 Kampala Road Diamond Trust Building opposite Cham Towers Domestic Taxes 8 Mukono Mukono T.C Domestic Taxes 9 Entebbe Entebbe Kitooro Domestic Taxes 10 Entebbe Entebbe Arrivals section, Airport Customs Nansana T.C, Katonda ya bigera House Block 203 11 Nansana Domestic Taxes Nansana Hoima road Plot 125; Next to new police station 12 Natete Domestic Taxes Natete Birus Mall Plot 1667; KyaliwajalaNamugongoKira Road - 13 Kyaliwajala Domestic Taxes Martyrs Mall. NORTHERN REGION ( East Nile and West Nile) s/n Station Location Tax Heads 1 Vurra Vurra (UG/DRC-Border) Customs 2 Pakwach Pakwach TC Customs 3 Goli Goli (UG/DRC- Border) Customs 4 Padea Padea (UG/DRC- Border) Customs 5 Lia Lia (UG/DRC - Border) Customs 6 Oraba Oraba (UG/S Sudan-Border) Customs 7 Afogi Afogi (UG/S Sudan – Border) Customs 8 Elegu Elegu (UG/S Sudan – Border) Customs 9 Madi-opei Kitgum S/Sudan - Border Customs 10 Kamdini Corner
    [Show full text]
  • WHO UGANDA BULLETIN February 2016 Ehealth MONTHLY BULLETIN
    WHO UGANDA BULLETIN February 2016 eHEALTH MONTHLY BULLETIN Welcome to this 1st issue of the eHealth Bulletin, a production 2015 of the WHO Country Office. Disease October November December This monthly bulletin is intended to bridge the gap between the Cholera existing weekly and quarterly bulletins; focus on a one or two disease/event that featured prominently in a given month; pro- Typhoid fever mote data utilization and information sharing. Malaria This issue focuses on cholera, typhoid and malaria during the Source: Health Facility Outpatient Monthly Reports, Month of December 2015. Completeness of monthly reporting DHIS2, MoH for December 2015 was above 90% across all the four regions. Typhoid fever Distribution of Typhoid Fever During the month of December 2015, typhoid cases were reported by nearly all districts. Central region reported the highest number, with Kampala, Wakiso, Mubende and Luweero contributing to the bulk of these numbers. In the north, high numbers were reported by Gulu, Arua and Koti- do. Cholera Outbreaks of cholera were also reported by several districts, across the country. 1 Visit our website www.whouganda.org and follow us on World Health Organization, Uganda @WHOUganda WHO UGANDA eHEALTH BULLETIN February 2016 Typhoid District Cholera Kisoro District 12 Fever Kitgum District 4 169 Abim District 43 Koboko District 26 Adjumani District 5 Kole District Agago District 26 85 Kotido District 347 Alebtong District 1 Kumi District 6 502 Amolatar District 58 Kween District 45 Amudat District 11 Kyankwanzi District
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Arms Trafficking in the Border Regions Of
    REPORT ON ARMS TRAFFICKING IN THE BORDER REGIONS OF SUDAN, UGANDA AND KENYA (A case Study of Uganda: North, Northeastern & Eastern) By Action For Development of Local Communities (ADOL) WITH SUPPORT FROM SWEDISH GOVERNMENT AND ACTION OF CHURCHES TOGETHER (ACT), NETHERLANDS. APRIL - JUNE, 2001. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................. 3 1.1. BACKGROUND 7 1.2 RESEARCH OBJECTIVES, COVERAGE AND METHODOLOGY 8 2.0. RESEARCH FINDINGS ............................................................................ 10 2.1 MARKETS 10 2.2 ROUTES AND MODES OF ARMS TRAFFICKING 14 Map 2 showing Gun Market Belts 15 2.2 SOURCES OF SMALL ARMS AND AMMUNITIONS 16 2.3 DEALERS AND BUYERS OF SMALL ARMS AND AMMUNITIONS 17 2.4 NETWORKS AND OTHER METHODS OF ARMS ACQUISITION 18 Diagram 1: CURRENT NETWORK OF GUNS AND AMMUNITION SALES 20 2.5 EFFECTS OF GUN TRAFFICKING ON COMMUNITIES 21 2.6 EFFORTS TO CURB GUN TRAFFICKING 21 2.7 IMPACT OF GUN TRAFFICKING ON LOCAL ECONOMIES 23 3.0 CONCLUSION ............................................................................................. 25 APPENDICES .................................................................................................... 26 APPENDIX 1 26 APPENDIX 2 28 3 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The study was conducted in the districts of Moroto, Kotido, Nakapiripirit, Katakwi, Soroti, Kumi, Lira, Kitgum, Gulu, Pader, Adjumani, Moyo, Yumbe, and Kapchorwa with the following objectives: ♦ Collect first hand data from local authorities, community leaders, businessmen, police personnel and the army on the sources and causes of arms trafficking in the border regions of Sudan, Uganda and Kenya. ♦ Collect information on the location of gun markets, the quantity of traded arms, and the motives for trading in arms and ammunitions as well as the networks in which the gun traffickers operate.
    [Show full text]
  • Livelihood Dynamics in Northern Karamoja
    LIVELIHOOD DYNAMICS IN NORTHERN KARAMOJA A Participatory Baseline Study for the Growth Health and Governance Program John Burns – Gezu Bekele – Darlington Akabwai May 2013 II Table of Contents SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 4 1.1 Research Background and Overview .................................................................................... 4 1.2 Research Questions .............................................................................................................. 5 2. METHODS .................................................................................................................................. 5 2.1 Study Overview ..................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Sampling ............................................................................................................................... 6 2.2.1 Method and Size ............................................................................................................. 6 2.3 Data Collection Methods ....................................................................................................... 7 2.4 Pre-Testing ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • FY 2020/21 Vote:552 Sironko District
    LG Draft Budget Estimates Vote:552 Sironko District FY 2020/21 Part I: Local Government Budget Estimates A1: Revenue Performance and Plans by Source Current Budget Performance Uganda Shillings Thousands Approved Budget for Cumulative Receipts by Draft Budget for FY FY 2019/20 End Dec for FY 2019/20 2020/21 Locally Raised Revenues 382,010 191,005 638,793 o/w Higher Local Government 382,010 191,005 262,480 o/w Lower Local Government 0 0 376,313 Discretionary Government Transfers 4,803,712 2,674,814 4,729,133 o/w Higher Local Government 3,390,648 1,849,055 3,475,655 o/w Lower Local Government 1,413,064 825,759 1,253,477 Conditional Government Transfers 25,140,060 13,766,324 26,567,214 o/w Higher Local Government 25,140,060 13,766,324 26,567,214 o/w Lower Local Government 0 0 0 Other Government Transfers 2,449,749 489,335 2,381,228 o/w Higher Local Government 2,449,749 489,335 2,381,228 o/w Lower Local Government 0 0 0 External Financing 280,092 161,936 280,098 o/w Higher Local Government 280,092 161,936 280,098 o/w Lower Local Government 0 0 0 Grand Total 33,055,622 17,283,415 34,596,465 o/w Higher Local Government 31,642,558 16,457,655 32,966,676 o/w Lower Local Government 1,413,064 825,759 1,629,790 A2: Expenditure Performance by end December 2019/20 and Plans for the next FY by Programme Approved Budget for FY Cumulative Receipts by Draft Budget for FY Uganda Shillings Thousands 2019/20 End Dec for FY 2019/20 2020/21 Administration 6,433,868 4,365,344 6,236,256 o/w Higher Local Government 6,116,177 4,273,976 4,982,779 o/w Lower Local
    [Show full text]