Environmental Geology of Lake and Porter Counties, Indiana an Aid to Planning

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Environmental Geology of Lake and Porter Counties, Indiana an Aid to Planning Environmental Geology of Lake and Porter Counties, Indiana An Aid to Planning By EDWIN J. HARTKE, JOHN R. HILL, and MARK RESHKIN ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY 8 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY SPECIAL REPORT 11 PRINTED BY AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF INDIANA BLOOMINGTON, INDIANA: 1975 STATE OF INDIANA Otis R. Bowen, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Joseph D. Cloud, Director GEOLOGICAL SURVEY John B. Patton, State Geologist For sale by Geological Survey, Bloomington, Ind. 47401 Price $2.00 Contents Page Page Abstract .................................................................. 1 Water Resources— Continued Introduction ............................................................ 1 Groundwater— Continued Natural character of the landscape ..................... 2 Contamination ........................................... 23 Calumet Lacustrine Plain ............................. 2 Water usage ............................................... 23 Valparaiso Morainal Area ............................ 3 Aquifer systems ......................................... 25 Kankakee Outwash and Lacustrine Plain ...... 3 Unconsolidated system........................ 25 Land use ........................................................... 3 Shallow bedrock system ...................... 30 Geologic history ................................................... 4 Deep bedrock system .......................... 34 Bedrock geology ............................................... 4 Summary of groundwater potential ............ 34 Geology of the unconsolidated deposits ............ 7 Industrial minerals................................................ 35 Calumet Lacustrine Plain ............................. 7 Sand and gravel............................................... 36 Valparaiso Morainal Area ............................ 7 Clays............................................................... 36 Kankakee Outwash and Lacustrine Plain ...... 8 Peat................................................................. 36 Engineering geology .............................................. 9 Slag................................................................. 36 Terminology...................................................... 9 Dolomite ......................................................... 37 Data and Interpretations................................... 10 Waste disposal ..................................................... 37 Calumet Lacustrine Plain ........................... 10 Subsurface liquid waste injection .................... 37 Valparaiso Morainal Area .......................... 12 Geologic andhydrologic aspects ................. 37 Kankakee Outwash and Lacustrine Plain .... 15 Environmental hazards............................... 39 Lake Michigan shoreline in Indiana...................... 15 Potential injection horizons........................ 39 Water Resources................................................... 16 Protective standards and criteria................. 39 Surface hydrology ........................................... 16 Sanitary landfills ............................................. 40 Calumet Lacustrine Plain ........................... 17 Liquid waste storage lagoons........................... 44 Valparaiso Morainal Area .......................... 17 Septic systems................................................. 46 Kankakee Outwash and Lacustrine Plain .... 19 Acknowledgements .............................................. 49 Environmental management ....................... 19 Literature cited..................................................... 49 Groundwater ................................................... 20 Glossary ............................................................... 50 System development .................................. 23 Appendix.............................................................. 51 Illustrations Page Plate 1 Summary of geologic properties and land use potential..............................................................In pocket Figure 1 Map of Indiana showing location of study area and major bedrock structural features............................ 2 2 Map showing physiographic units ......................................................................................................... 3 3 Generalized column showing lithologies and ......................................................................................... 5 4 Map showing bedrock topography6........................................................................................................ 6 5 Generalized southwest-northeast cross section showing physiography and interrelationships of unconsolidated deposits................................................................................................................. 8 6 Map showing numbered auger hole locations....................................................................................... 11 7 Map showing drift thickness at well locations in Lake and Porter Counties .......................................... 14 8 Map showing surface and subsurface hydrologic features in Lake and Porter Counties ......................... 18 Illustrations Page Figure 9 Geologic column from surface of Valparaiso Moraine to Precambrian basement showing locations of aquifer systems, hydrologic properties, and material descriptions ................................................... 21 10 Map showing potentiometric surface of unconsolidated aquifer ............................................................. 22 11 Map showing groundwater contamination potential ................................................................................ 24 12 Map showing water quality in ppm sulfate in unconsolidated aquifer system and approximate areal extent of each aquifer.......................................................................................................................... 26 13 Map showing water quality in ppm hardness as CaC03 in unconsolidated aquifer system and approximate areal extent of each aquifer ............................................................................................ 27 14 Map showing water quality in ppm iron in unconsolidated aquifer system and approximate areal extent of each aquifer.......................................................................................................................... 28 15 Idealized north-south cross section through Lake County showing positions of unconsolidated aquifers .............................................................................................................................................. 29 16 Map showing water quality in ppm sulfate in shallow bedrock aquifer ................................................... 31 17 Map showing water quality in ppm hardness as CaC03 in shallow bedrock aquifer ............................... 32 18 Map showing water quality in ppm iron in shallow bedrock aquifer ...................................................... 33 19 Northwest-southeast cross section showing structure, approximate permeability, and water quality in deep bedrock aquifer ....................................................................................................................... 35 20 Generalized column of rock formations showing waste injection suitability ........................................... 38 21 Map showing locations of injection wells ............................................................................................... 40 22 Cross section showing stratigraphic relationships of injection zones for active injection wells................ 41 23 Schematic diagram showing recommended development of a typical waste injection well using the Mount Simon Sandstone below the “B” cap .................................................................................... 42 24 Map showing areas of relative potential suitability for sanitary landfills ................................................ 43 25 Map showing areas of relative potential suitability for settling ponds .................................................... 45 26 Map showing areas of relative failure potential of septic systems and causes of failure .......................... 48 Table Page Table 1 Modified Wentworth scale of particle sizes............................................................................................... 9 Environmental Geology of Lake and Porter Counties, Indiana- An Aid to Planning By EDWIN J. HARTKE, JOHN R. HILL, and MARK RESHKIN1 Abstract in areas where little is known about the engineering Lake and Porter Counties are subdivided into three and hydrologic properties of the materials, (6) physiographically and geologically distinct regions: disposal of industrial wastes by deep well injection (1) the Calumet Lacustrine Plain, (2) the Valparaiso methods, and (7) development of groundwater Morainal Area, and (3) the Kankakee Outwash and supplies without sufficient hydrologic and geologic Lacustrine Plain. The surficial deposits of these data. regions, which range in thickness from 40 feet near The environmental problems of Lake and the Kankakee River to more than 250 feet near Porter Counties, are related to geology, are as varied Valparaiso, Ind,. Are the products, either directly or and complex as the materials themselves. Specific indirectly, of the Wisconsinan Age of glaciation. The questions related to a given problem are best answered Calumet lake plain is characterized by low-lying by the competent consultant equipped to do so. This complexly
Recommended publications
  • Lexicon of Pleistocene Stratigraphic Units of Wisconsin
    Lexicon of Pleistocene Stratigraphic Units of Wisconsin ON ATI RM FO K CREE MILLER 0 20 40 mi Douglas Member 0 50 km Lake ? Crab Member EDITORS C O Kent M. Syverson P P Florence Member E R Lee Clayton F Wildcat A Lake ? L L Member Nashville Member John W. Attig M S r ik be a F m n O r e R e TRADE RIVER M a M A T b David M. Mickelson e I O N FM k Pokegama m a e L r Creek Mbr M n e M b f a e f lv m m i Sy e l M Prairie b C e in Farm r r sk er e o emb lv P Member M i S ill S L rr L e A M Middle F Edgar ER M Inlet HOLY HILL V F Mbr RI Member FM Bakerville MARATHON Liberty Grove M Member FM F r Member e E b m E e PIERCE N M Two Rivers Member FM Keene U re PIERCE A o nm Hersey Member W le FM G Member E Branch River Member Kinnickinnic K H HOLY HILL Member r B Chilton e FM O Kirby Lake b IG Mbr Boundaries Member m L F e L M A Y Formation T s S F r M e H d l Member H a I o V r L i c Explanation o L n M Area of sediment deposited F e m during last part of Wisconsin O b er Glaciation, between about R 35,000 and 11,000 years M A Ozaukee before present.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambrian Ordovician
    Open File Report LXXVI the shale is also variously colored. Glauconite is generally abundant in the formation. The Eau Claire A Summary of the Stratigraphy of the increases in thickness southward in the Southern Peninsula of Michigan where it becomes much more Southern Peninsula of Michigan * dolomitic. by: The Dresbach sandstone is a fine to medium grained E. J. Baltrusaites, C. K. Clark, G. V. Cohee, R. P. Grant sandstone with well rounded and angular quartz grains. W. A. Kelly, K. K. Landes, G. D. Lindberg and R. B. Thin beds of argillaceous dolomite may occur locally in Newcombe of the Michigan Geological Society * the sandstone. It is about 100 feet thick in the Southern Peninsula of Michigan but is absent in Northern Indiana. The Franconia sandstone is a fine to medium grained Cambrian glauconitic and dolomitic sandstone. It is from 10 to 20 Cambrian rocks in the Southern Peninsula of Michigan feet thick where present in the Southern Peninsula. consist of sandstone, dolomite, and some shale. These * See last page rocks, Lake Superior sandstone, which are of Upper Cambrian age overlie pre-Cambrian rocks and are The Trempealeau is predominantly a buff to light brown divided into the Jacobsville sandstone overlain by the dolomite with a minor amount of sandy, glauconitic Munising. The Munising sandstone at the north is dolomite and dolomitic shale in the basal part. Zones of divided southward into the following formations in sandy dolomite are in the Trempealeau in addition to the ascending order: Mount Simon, Eau Claire, Dresbach basal part. A small amount of chert may be found in and Franconia sandstones overlain by the Trampealeau various places in the formation.
    [Show full text]
  • Kankakee Watershed
    Van Kankakee 8 Digit Watershed (07120001) Buren Total Acres: 1,937,043 Kankakee Watershed - 12 Digit HUCs Illinois Acres: 561,041 Indiana Acres: 1,371,490 Michigan Acres: 4,512 LAKE MICHIGAN Indiana Counties Acres s n i a Elkhart County: 7,287 o g Kane i n Fulton County: 1 i l h Berrien l c Cass Jasper County: 103,436 I i Kosciusko County: 32,683 M Lake County: D15u1P,6a3g8e LaPorte County: 298,166 Marshall County: 207,453 Newton County: 79,365 Porter County: 141,795 Pulaski County: 8,658 St. Joseph County: 175,401 Indiana 0201 Starke County: 165,607 Cook LaPorte 0202 Grey shaded 12-digit watersheds fall completely or 0207 0 2 0203 partially within Indiana. Shaded 12-digit watershed 0 St. 0403 4 0205 names and acres are on page 2. Joseph Elkhart 0208 0 0206 4-digit labels represent the last 4 numbers of the 4 0209 0406 02 12-digit watershed code. 0 0104 0 4 3 *Please note, all acres are approximate.* 1003 01 0 0302 0 0105 5 Winter 2013 1 0 10 0 0 4 6 0301 02 1 4 0 0 0 0 4 0304 0 8 7 0102 Porter 0 1 0405 1 0 Will 1004 0 1 0303 8 0 1807 0 3 0101 Lake 4 8 0702 1308 0 0309 4 1007 8 0803 8 0 0 1 0 18 0703 11 1702 0 0 3 0307 1 0 0312 3 1 1 3 0 0 0701 2 1 0 1809 0 5 1306 1302 9 0308 1 0 2 5 0 5 4 1309 6 0704 0306 1 1 8 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 0310 y 0502 8 0 1703 7 3 0 0 5 0705 0504 1010 0 d 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 8 n 3 1 0506 1 1 0 u 1 3 0 0603 0505 r 0 1 4 1305 8 1806 1502 8 1 30 0 G 1 6 0503 Marshall 1 0 1311 4 1 Kosciusko 1 0904 0501 1504 1 3 0604 0602 4 1 1604 3 0807 0 3 2 1307 1 4 1 0 0 Starke 8 2 8 0 3 9 0 4 1 0 1204 1101 0 9 1805 9 0601 1602 0 1803 1205
    [Show full text]
  • Indiana Glaciers.PM6
    How the Ice Age Shaped Indiana Jerry Wilson Published by Wilstar Media, www.wilstar.com Indianapolis, Indiana 1 Previiously published as The Topography of Indiana: Ice Age Legacy, © 1988 by Jerry Wilson. Second Edition Copyright © 2008 by Jerry Wilson ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2 For Aaron and Shana and In Memory of Donna 3 Introduction During the time that I have been a science teacher I have tried to enlist in my students the desire to understand and the ability to reason. Logical reasoning is the surest way to overcome the unknown. The best aid to reasoning effectively is having the knowledge and an understanding of the things that have previ- ously been determined or discovered by others. Having an understanding of the reasons things are the way they are and how they got that way can help an individual to utilize his or her resources more effectively. I want my students to realize that changes that have taken place on the earth in the past have had an effect on them. Why are some towns in Indiana subject to flooding, whereas others are not? Why are cemeteries built on old beach fronts in Northwest Indiana? Why would it be easier to dig a basement in Valparaiso than in Bloomington? These things are a direct result of the glaciers that advanced southward over Indiana during the last Ice Age. The history of the land upon which we live is fascinating. Why are there large granite boulders nested in some of the fields of northern Indiana since Indiana has no granite bedrock? They are known as glacial erratics, or dropstones, and were formed in Canada or the upper Midwest hundreds of millions of years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • GEOLOGY What Can I Do with This Major?
    GEOLOGY What can I do with this major? AREAS EMPLOYERS STRATEGIES Some employment areas follow. Many geolo- gists specialize at the graduate level. ENERGY (Oil, Coal, Gas, Other Energy Sources) Stratigraphy Petroleum industry including oil and gas explora- Geologists working in the area of energy use vari- Sedimentology tion, production, storage and waste disposal ous methods to determine where energy sources are Structural Geology facilities accumulated. They may pursue work tasks including Geophysics Coal industry including mining exploration, grade exploration, well site operations and mudlogging. Geochemistry assessment and waste disposal Seek knowledge in engineering to aid communication, Economic Geology Federal government agencies: as geologists often work closely with engineers. Geomorphology National Labs Coursework in geophysics is also advantageous Paleontology Department of Energy for this field. Fossil Energy Bureau of Land Management Gain experience with computer modeling and Global Hydrogeology Geologic Survey Positioning System (GPS). Both are used to State government locate deposits. Consulting firms Many geologists in this area of expertise work with oil Well services and drilling companies and gas and may work in the geographic areas Oil field machinery and supply companies where deposits are found including offshore sites and in overseas oil-producing countries. This industry is subject to fluctuations, so be prepared to work on a contract basis. Develop excellent writing skills to publish reports and to solicit grants from government, industry and private foundations. Obtain leadership experience through campus organi- zations and work experiences for project man- agement positions. (Geology, Page 2) AREAS EMPLOYERS STRATEGIES ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY Sedimentology Federal government agencies: Geologists in this category may focus on studying, Hydrogeology National Labs protecting and reclaiming the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment B-13
    Attachment B-13 Hydrogeology for Underground Injection Control · n Michigan: Part 1 Department of Geology Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Underground Injection Control Program 1981 Acknowledgements ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF DENNIS L. CURRAN LINDA J. MILLER DONALD N. LESKE Project Coordinator Cartographer Regional Coordinator PROJECT DIRECTORS RICHARD N. PASSERO W. Thomas Straw Lloyd J. Schmaltz Ph .D., Professor of Geology Ph.D., Professor of Geology Chatrman, Department of Geology Department of Geology, Western Michigan University RESEARCH STAFF CYNTHIA BATHRICK WILLIAM GIERKE CRYSTAL KEMTER JEFFREY PFOST PAUL CIARAMITARO PAUL GOODREAULT STEVEN KIMM NICK POGONCHEFF PATRICIA DALIAN DAVID HALL KEVIN KINCARE KIFF SAMUELSON DOUGLAS DANIELS EVELYN HALL MICHAEL KLEIN JEFFREY SPRUIT DARCEY DAVENPORT THOMAS HANNA BARBARA LEONARD GARY STEFANIAK JEFFREY DEYOUNG ROBERT HORNTVEDT THOMAS LUBY JOSEPH VANDERMEULEN GEORGE DUBA JON HERMANN HALLY MAHAN LISA VARGA SHARON EAST WILLIAM JOHNSTON JAMES McLAUGHLIN KATHERINE WILSON JAMES FARNSWORTH PHILLIP KEAVEY DEANNA PALLADINO MICHAEL WIREMAN LINDA FENNER DONALD PENNEMAN CARTOGRAPHIC STAFF LINDA J. MILLER Chief Cartographer SARAH CUNNINGHAM CAROL BUCHANAN ARLENE D. SHUB DAVID MOORE KENNETH BATTS CHRISTOPHER H. JANSEN NORMAN AMES ANDREW DAVIS ANN CASTEL PATRICK HUDSON MARK LUTZ JOAN HENDRICKSEN MAPPING CONSULTANT THOMAS W. HODLER Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Geography Department of Geography Western Michigan University CLERICAL PERSONNEL KARN KIK JANET NIEWOONDER
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphic Succession in Lower Peninsula of Michigan
    STRATIGRAPHIC DOMINANT LITHOLOGY ERA PERIOD EPOCHNORTHSTAGES AMERICANBasin Margin Basin Center MEMBER FORMATIONGROUP SUCCESSION IN LOWER Quaternary Pleistocene Glacial Drift PENINSULA Cenozoic Pleistocene OF MICHIGAN Mesozoic Jurassic ?Kimmeridgian? Ionia Sandstone Late Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Conemaugh Grand River Formation Geological Survey Division Late Harold Fitch, State Geologist Pennsylvanian and Saginaw Formation ?Pottsville? Michigan Basin Geological Society Early GEOL IN OG S IC A A B L N Parma Sandstone S A O G C I I H E C T I Y Bayport Limestone M Meramecian Grand Rapids Group 1936 Late Michigan Formation Stratigraphic Nomenclature Project Committee: Mississippian Dr. Paul A. Catacosinos, Co-chairman Mark S. Wollensak, Co-chairman Osagian Marshall Sandstone Principal Authors: Dr. Paul A. Catacosinos Early Kinderhookian Coldwater Shale Dr. William Harrison III Robert Reynolds Sunbury Shale Dr. Dave B.Westjohn Mark S. Wollensak Berea Sandstone Chautauquan Bedford Shale 2000 Late Antrim Shale Senecan Traverse Formation Traverse Limestone Traverse Group Erian Devonian Bell Shale Dundee Limestone Middle Lucas Formation Detroit River Group Amherstburg Form. Ulsterian Sylvania Sandstone Bois Blanc Formation Garden Island Formation Early Bass Islands Dolomite Sand Salina G Unit Paleozoic Glacial Clay or Silt Late Cayugan Salina F Unit Till/Gravel Salina E Unit Salina D Unit Limestone Salina C Shale Salina Group Salina B Unit Sandy Limestone Salina A-2 Carbonate Silurian Salina A-2 Evaporite Shaley Limestone Ruff Formation
    [Show full text]
  • Biosphere 2 (B2) PI: Katerina Dontsova, Phd Co-PI: Kevin Bonine, Phd Sponsors: National Science Foundation Research Experiences for Undergraduates (NSF REU) Program
    Biosphere 2 (B2) PI: Katerina Dontsova, PhD Co-PI: Kevin Bonine, PhD Sponsors: National Science Foundation Research Experiences for Undergraduates (NSF REU) Program BIOSPHERE 2 (B2) Kierstin Acuña The effect of nanochitosan on piñon pine (Pinus edulis) seedling mortality in heatwave conditions University of Maryland, Environmental Science and Policy Mentor: Dr. Dave Breshears, Jason Field and Darin Law – School of Natural Resources and the Environment Abstract Semiarid grasslands worldwide are facing woody plant encroachment, a process that dramatically alters carbon and nutrient cycling. This change in plant types can influence the function of soil microbial communities with unknown consequences for soil carbon cycling and storage. We used soils collected from a five-year passive warming experiment in Southern, AZ to test the effects of warming and substrate availability on microbial carbon use. We hypothesized that substrate addition would increase the diversity of microbial substrate use, and that substrate additions and warming would increase carbon acquisition, creating a positive feedback on carbon mineralization. Community Level Physiological Profiling (CLPP) of microbial activity was conducted using Biolog EcoPlateTMassays from soils collected in July 2018, one week after the start of monsoon rains. Two soil types common to Southern AZ, were amended with one of four treatments (surface juniper wood chips, juniper wood chips incorporated into the soil, surface biochar, or a no-amendment control) and were randomly assigned to a warmed or ambient temperature treatment. We found that surface wood chips resulted in the highest richness and diversity of carbon substrate use with control soils yielding the lowest. Substrate use was positively correlated with the total organic carbon but not with warming.
    [Show full text]
  • Illinois Snowmobile Trails
    Connects To Wisconsin Trails East g g Dubuque g Warren L E G E N D 26 Richmond 173 78 Durand E State Grant Assisted Snowmobile Trails N Harvard O Galena O on private lands, open to the public. For B ILLINOIS’ SELF-FUNDED 75 E K detailed information on these trails, contact: A 173 L n 20 Capron n Illinois Association of Snowmobile Clubs, Inc. n P.O. Box 265 • Marseilles, IL 61341-0265 N O O P G e A McHenry Gurnee S c er B (815) 795-2021 • Fax (815) 795-6507 TRAIL SYSTEM Stockton N at iv E E onica R N H N Y e-mail: [email protected] P I R i i E W Woodstock N i T E S H website: www.ilsnowmobile.com C Freeport 20 M S S The State of Illinois has adopted, by legislative E Rockford Illinois Department of Natural Resources I 84 l V l A l D r Snowmobile Trails open to the public. e Belvidere JO v action, a system of funding whereby snowmobilers i R 90 k i i c Algonquin i themselves pay for the network of trails that criss-cross Ro 72 the northern 1/3 of the state. Monies are generated by Savanna Forreston Genoa 72 Illinois Department of Natural Resources 72 Snowmobile Trail Sites. See other side for detailed L L information on these trails. An advance call to the site 64 O Monroe snowmobile registration fees. These funds are administered by R 26 R E A L is recommended for trail conditions and suitability for C G O Center Elgin b b the Department of Natural Resources in cooperation with the snowmobile use.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Inspector General Clinical
    Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Inspector General Office of Healthcare Inspections Report No. 16-00577-335 Clinical Assessment Program Review of the VA Northern Indiana Health Care System Fort Wayne, Indiana August 15, 2017 Washington, DC 20420 In addition to general privacy laws that govern release of medical information, disclosure of certain veteran health or other private information may be prohibited by various Federal statutes including, but not limited to, 38 U.S.C. §§ 5701, 5705, and 7332, absent an exemption or other specified circumstances. As mandated by law, OIG adheres to privacy and confidentiality laws and regulations protecting veteran health or other private information in this report. To Report Suspected Wrongdoing in VA Programs and Operations Telephone: 1-800-488-8244 (Hotline Information: www.va.gov/oig/hotline) CAP Review of the VA Northern Indiana Health Care System, Fort Wayne, IN Glossary CAP Clinical Assessment Program CNH community nursing home EHR electronic health record EOC environment of care facility VA Northern Indiana Health Care System FY fiscal year MH mental health NA not applicable NM not met OIG Office of Inspector General PC primary care POCT point-of-care testing QSV quality, safety, and value RME reusable medical equipment SPS Sterile Processing Service VHA Veterans Health Administration VISN Veterans Integrated Service Network VA OIG Office of Healthcare Inspections CAP Review of the VA Northern Indiana Health Care System, Fort Wayne, IN Table of Contents Page Executive Summary ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Elkhart Resource Directory
    1 Elkhart Resource Directory Elkhart, IN Elkhart County PMEP Study BRAVE Lab 2 Table of Contents Addiction Recovery 3 Child Care 4 Employment 5 Food and Clothing 6 Housing/Shelters 8 Legal Services 9 Medical/Dental Care 10 Mental Health Counseling 13 Prenatal Services 14 Emergency/Important Phone Numbers 15 3 Addiction Recovery Alcoholics Anonymous - Serenity Hall The Elkhart Area Central Service Office is “an AA service office that involves partnership among Groups in our community—just as AA groups themselves are partnerships of the individuals. It exists to aid the groups in their common purpose of carrying the AA message to the alcoholic who still suffers.” Address: 949 ½ Middlebury St, Elkhart IN 46516 Phone: (574) 295-8188 Center for Problem Resolution The Center’s goal is to effectively treat alcohol and drug-addicted clients in an outpatient setting. They also offer domestic violence prevention programming specifically focusing on a Batterers Intervention Program. Behavioral Healthcare of Northern Indiana th Address: 211 South 5 St, Elkhart IN Phone: (574) 294-7447 CleanSlate Outpatient Addiction Medicine CleanSlate is a multi-state medical group that provides effective treatment for the chronic disease of addiction, primarily alcohol and opioid use disorders. We partner with local care providers to ensure patients have access to all the resources they need, including supportive counseling and clear accountability. Address: 1004 Parkway Ave, Elkhart IN Phone: (574) 218-7131 Elkhart Addiction Recovery Center ARC provides outpatient services that are related to the misuse of one or more substances. Enrollment in one of our programs requires a current clinical evaluation from a recognized addictions provider.
    [Show full text]
  • We Are Writing to Express Our Concern And
    To Whom It May Concern: We are writing to express our concern and disappointment over the settlement entered into between the City of East Chicago and the Office of the Utility Consumer Counselor in Cause No. 44826. Under the terms of the settlement, an item providing for the use of Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) money to replace lead service lines was eliminated. As a result, we will be saddled with a 55% increase in our water bills, but may never be able to drink the water for which we are paying. The problem of lead contamination in East Chicago’s drinking water, recently brought to light by EPA’s independent testing,1 compounds the lead contamination in our yards, gardens and homes. The USS Lead Superfund site in East Chicago, which covers three East Chicago neighborhoods (West Calumet, Calumet, and East Calumet) is especially heavily affected by lead contamination. The neighborhoods in the USS Lead Superfund site, where many of us reside, are home to several thousand people. In addition to the ongoing evacuation of the West Calumet Housing Complex (formerly home to more than 1000 people), hundreds of homes in our neighborhoods exceed residential screening levels for lead in the soil and are awaiting EPA cleanup; dozens more have already been subject to emergency cleanup actions. Because lead exposure is cumulative, the public health impact of lead- contaminated drinking water is even greater in the Superfund site, where residents—especially children —are exposed to high levels of lead from other sources, than it would be elsewhere. Thus, the denial of funding for lead service line replacement is of particularly great concern for our communities.
    [Show full text]