DOCSLIB.ORG

Nfa Norway Ling & Tusk and Nfa Norway Lumpfish

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nfa Norway Ling & Tusk and Nfa Norway Lumpfish Surveillance NFA NORWAY LING & TUSK AND NFA NORWAY LUMPFISH FISHERIES Marine Stewardship Council fisheries assessments Conformity Assessment Body (CAB) DNV Business Assurance Assessment team Hans J. Lassen, Jodi Bostrom & Sandhya Chaudhury Fishery client Norges Fiskarlag (Norwegian Fishermen's Association) Assessment Type 3rd Surveillance Report Author name Hans J. Lassen, Jodi Bostrom & Sandhya Chaudhury Date 18.05.2021 NFA Norway ling & tusk and NFA Norway lumpfish Fisheries- 3rd Surveillance report 18.05.2021 2 Introduction Covid 19 derogation 27.03.2020 The surveillance report timeline is subject to a 6-month extension in accordance with Covid-19 Derogation 27 March 2020 DNV dnv.com NFA Norway ling & tusk and NFA Norway lumpfish Fisheries- 3rd Surveillance report 18.05.2021 3 1 Contents 1 Contents .......................................................................................................... 3 2 Glossary .......................................................................................................... 5 3 Executive summary ......................................................................................... 7 3.1 The assessment process ........................................................................................... 8 3.2 History of the assessment ......................................................................................... 8 3.2.1 Summary of the original assessment .............................................................................. 8 3.2.2 First annual surveillance- February 2019 ........................................................................ 9 3.2.3 Second annual surveillance – December 2019 .............................................................. 9 3.2.4 Third annual surveillance – Year 2021 .......................................................................... 10 3.3 Summary of surveillance audit findings ................................................................... 10 3.4 Conclusion ............................................................................................................... 10 4 Report details ................................................................................................ 12 4.1 Surveillance information ........................................................................................... 12 4.2 Background .............................................................................................................. 18 4.2.1 Lumpfish (Cyclopterus lumpus) Norwegian Coast ........................................................ 18 4.2.2 Ling (Molva molva) in subareas 1 and 2 (Northeast Arctic) .......................................... 20 4.2.3 St Tusk (Brosme brosme) in subareas 1 and 2 (Northeast Arctic) ............................... 22 4.2.4 Impact on the ecosystem .............................................................................................. 23 4.2.5 Bait for long line fishery ................................................................................................. 34 4.2.6 Impact on habitats ......................................................................................................... 34 4.2.7 Changes to the management system ........................................................................... 35 4.2.8 Changes to relevant regulations ................................................................................... 37 4.2.9 Changes to personnel involved in science, management or industry. .......................... 37 4.2.10 Changes that impact Traceability .................................................................................. 37 4.2.11 Status of Inseparable or practically inseparable stock (IPI) .......................................... 38 4.2.12 Enhanced fisheries ........................................................................................................ 38 4.3 Version details ......................................................................................................... 38 5 Results .......................................................................................................... 39 5.1 Surveillance results overview .................................................................................. 39 5.1.1 Summary of conditions .................................................................................................. 39 5.1.2 Total Allowable Catch (TAC) and catch data ................................................................ 45 5.1.3 Recommendations ........................................................................................................ 46 5.2 Re-scoring Performance Indicators ......................................................................... 47 5.3 Conditions ................................................................................................................ 49 5.3.1 Closed Conditions ......................................................................................................... 49 5.3.2 Progress against conditions .......................................................................................... 50 5.4 Client Action Plan ..................................................................................................... 66 6 Appendices ................................................................................................... 72 6.1 Evaluation processes and techniques ..................................................................... 72 6.1.1 Site visits ....................................................................................................................... 72 6.1.2 Stakeholder participation ............................................................................................... 74 DNV dnv.com NFA Norway ling & tusk and NFA Norway lumpfish Fisheries- 3rd Surveillance report 18.05.2021 4 6.2 Stakeholder input ..................................................................................................... 74 6.3 Revised surveillance program ................................................................................. 75 6.4 Harmonised fishery assessments ............................................................................ 76 6.5 References ............................................................................................................... 78 6.6 Variation Request and MSC response .................................................................... 80 6.7 Vessel list ................................................................................................................. 86 6.8 List of landing sites ................................................................................................ 122 7 Template information and copyright ............................................................ 150 Figure 1 IESSNS Survey results. Number of Lumpfish. Left Panel estimates based on STOX software. ..................... 19 Figure 2 Results from BESS survey. Number of Lumpfish. Left panel estimates based on STOX software. ................ 19 Figure 3 Ling in ICES 1+2. Stock status and stock trends. Source: ICES (2019) Advice on Ling 1+2 .......................... 21 Figure 4 Tusk in ICES 1+2. Stock status and stock trends. Source: ICES (2020) Advice on tusk in 1+2 ...................... 23 Figure 5 Hooded seal distribution. Source: https://nammco.no/topics/hooded-seal/ ...................................................... 33 Figure 6 Ringed seal distribution. Source: https://nammco.no/topics/ringed-seal/ ......................................................... 33 Figure 7 Areas fished (green) by the UoCs for tusk and ling in 2019 and 2020. Source: Fiskeridirektoratet................. 35 Table 1 General Information 7 Table 2 Principle scores – initial assessment (PCR 2017) ............................................................................................... 8 Table 3 Status of conditions at this audit (GN: gillnets; LL: longline) .............................................................................. 10 Table 4 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................................................... 11 Table 5 Surveillance information ..................................................................................................................................... 12 Table 6 Norwegian Catch of Lumpfish Roe (tons) 2008-2020. Source Durif (2020) ...................................................... 18 Table 7 Tusk catch composition (in MT) for Norwegian vessels for 2019 and 2020 ...................................................... 24 Table 8 Ling catch composition (in MT) for Norwegian vessels for 2019 and 2020 ....................................................... 26 Table 9 Lumpfish catch composition (in MT) for Norwegian vessels for 2019 and 2020 ............................................... 28 Table 10 Redfish catch as percentage of total catch for each UoC ......................................................................... 30 Table 11 The protection measures and status (where relevant) of the ETP species overlapping with the UoCs. ......... 30 Table 12 ETP species’ percentage of catch ................................................................................................................... 30 Table 13 Estimated bycatch of seabirds per trip in the lumpfish fishery. ........................................................................ 31 Table 14 Total
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mt-2018-2-3.Pdf
    2–3/2018 Kr 48,- TIDSAM 1098-02 NORWEGIAN DEFENCE And ECURITY ndUSTRIES ssOCIATION 9 770806 615906 02 S I A RETURUKEReturuke 39 v 12 STYRETS ÅRSBERETNING 2017 GiraffeFlexible protection for mobile forces1X Saab Technologies Norway AS saab.no CONTENTS CONTENTS: MINE CLEARANCE Editor-in-Chief: 2 The future is unmanned M.Sc. Bjørn Domaas Josefsen NSM 6 US Navy selects Naval Strike Missile NORDIC DEFENCE CO- OPERATION; NOT NECESSARILY DOOMED TO FAILURE NORDEFCO 8 NDIS (Nordic Defence Industry Seminar) 2018 Nordic collaboration within the defence sector has for many years been riddled with good intentions, but often with meagre results to show for all the efforts. FSi The Nordic countries are often regarded as a common unit, with 11 Norwegian Defence and Security almost similar languages (except Finland), a great deal of cultural Industries Association (FSi) similarity, and a long-standing tradition for co-operation on a number of different arenas. And yet, there are significant differences between the countries, not 17 ÅRSRAPPORT 2017 least from a security political and military point of view. Two of the Nordic countries are members of NATO, while two are BULLETIN BOARD FOR DEFENCE, alliance-free. Finland has an extended land border to Russia, while INDUSTRY AND TRADE Norway has a short land border as well as a long demarcation line at sea. Neither Sweden nor Denmark have land borders to Russia. 59 Gripen Plant in Brazil Sweden and Finland have huge forest regions, where Norway has 61 Command post shelters for Kongsberg fjords, mountains and deep valleys; Denmark mainly consists of a flat 63 Training Systems for the Swedish Army culture landscape spread across some mainland and a few large islands.
    [Show full text]
  • STYRE OG KOMITEER 2019 HAAKONSVERN PENSJONISTFORENING Navn Adresse Postnr
    STYRE OG KOMITEER 2019 HAAKONSVERN PENSJONISTFORENING Navn Adresse Postnr. Telefon Mobil e-post Verv Styret Olsen, Bjørn Kiplelien 12 5179 Godvik 55265562 97521664 [email protected] Leder Osberg, Terje Solåsen 2H 5223 Nesttun 92414363 [email protected] Nestleder/ Leder Reisekomite Jespersen, Per-Johan Sollien 35b 5096 Bergen 55297982 90259836 [email protected] Sekretær Halvorsen, Britt Vassenden 44 5174 Mathopen 55930612 91124381 [email protected] Kasserer Johansen, Elin Steen Skareveien 6 5174 Mathopen 55266934 41108817 [email protected] Styremedlem/Leder vervekomite Flæsland, Jan Gunnar Olsvikmarken 147 5183 Olsvik 98068013 [email protected] Styremedlem/ Leder Kos & Kurs Hammersland, Helge Hammersland 5382 Skogsvåg 56337145 90983754 Styremedlem/Reisekomite Vågseth, Borgny Strimmelen 20 5097 Bergen 95994305 [email protected] Varamedlem Voll, Britt Vassendveien 8 5174 Mathopen 91863999 [email protected] Varamedlem Arrangementskomite Osberg, Terje Solåsen 2H 5223 Nesttun 92414363 [email protected] Leder Osberg, Beate Solåsen 2H 5223 Nesttun 93047926 [email protected] Bergset, Dagny Rekdalsv. 74 5151 Straumsgrend 55121032 91522081 [email protected] Bergset, Svein Rekdalsv. 74 5151 Straumsgrend 55121032 95727578 [email protected] Hansen, Aase Liv Tveita Gyseterlia 16 5174 Mathopen 46485881 Flæsland, Jan Gunnar Olsvikmarken 147 5183 Olsvik 55935679 98068013 [email protected] Stifinnerkomite Jespersen, Per-Johan Sollien 35b 5096 Bergen 55297982 90259836 [email protected] Leder Sunde, Per A. Kipledalen 15 5179 Godvik 90999213 Stifinner Light komite Olsen, Randi Eliassen Kiplelien 12 5179 Godvik 55265562 97479959 [email protected] Leder Valvik, Harald Gjerdehaugen 11 5174 Mathopen 90024539 Hesjedal, Anne Kristine Ture Nermansvei 166 5143 Fyllingsdalen 92444868 [email protected] Hobbyrom/UVB Bergset, Svein Rekdalsv.
    [Show full text]
  • Varslingsliste Planoppstart Solnutane Hytteområde Naboar Og Berørde Parter
    Varslingsliste planoppstart Solnutane hytteområde Naboar og berørde parter Gårdsnr Bruksnr Namn Eigars adresse Postnr Poststad 142 37, 76, 128 GUNNAR SIGURD FAYE og TURID HELLAN STORETVEITVEGEN 19 F 5067 BERGEN 143 28 INGRID WAAGBØ HODNELANDog JON HODNELAND NIPEDALEN 11 5164 LAKSEVÅG 142 23 ARNE KOLVE MELKERAAENog BJØRG MELVE MELKERAAEN FREIMSBØNO 2 5750 ODDA 142 95 ANNE KAMLUND RINGDAL LILLE STAREFOSSVEIEN 6 A 5019 BERGEN 142 80 OLE MARIUS JØRSog RUTH JOHANNE JØRS DAMSGÅRDSLIEN 27 5161 LAKSEVÅG 142 9 CECILIE NAGELGAARD KALLAND GRINDHAUGVEGEN 38 B 5259 HJELLESTAD 142 9 WENCHE NAGELGAARD PETERSEN HATLESTADLIA 145 5227 NESTTUN 142/146 og 143/1 TORGEIR REIME RAUNDALSVEGEN 1832 5706 VOSS 142 44 INGRID MARGRETHE EGENÆS HERLAND og NILS KRISTIAN HERLAND BREIVIKDALEN 28 5179 GODVIK 142 10 KATHRINE LØNO LAHLUM STRANDAVEGEN 749 5710 SKULESTADMO 143 69 ROAR SCHANKE MOBERGSBAKKEN 14 5200 OS 142 57 ERIC ANDREAS HAUGE og MARIANNE MIDDELTHON-MOE ØVRE BERGVEIEN 22 5152 BØNES 142 83 CHRISTIAN JØRS ØRNEFJELLET 78 5174 MATHOPEN 142 14 LILLI JOHANNE HANTHO SUDMANNS VEI 29 5037 BERGEN 142 120 EVA MARGRETHE AAKERMANN NORDÅSGRENDA 134 5235 RÅDAL 142 1 DAGNY VANGEN VANGSGATA 40 A 5700 VOSS 143 56 OLE ANDREAS OLSNES TUFTADALEN 35 A 5265 YTRE ARNA 143 40, 46 IVAR AASHEIM og WENCHE HAUKANES SKAGETJERNVEGEN 28 5258 BLOMSTERDALEN 141 33 GEORG ØVSTHUS og LEIV ØVSTHUS LØBERGSALLEEN 15 5073 BERGEN 142 94 CHARLOTTE VILLANGER NIELSEN ØVRE RÅTRÆET 21 B 5239 RÅDAL 142 94 MERETE VILLANGER NIELSEN NORDRE OTERVEGEN 7 5236 RÅDAL 143 7, 8, 12 KNUT HEGG RAUNDALSVEGEN 2004 5706
    [Show full text]
  • International-Newsletter-02-15.Pdf
    International Newsletter 2/15 2 | International Newsletter 2/2015 Contents 1. Our partner regions 3 2. Cooperation through European organisations 9 3. Projects 11 4. Youth and internationalisation 14 5. West Norway Office in Brussels 20 6. Other activities 21 Hordaland County Council is responsible for county policies within the follow- ing fields: Higher secondary education, cultural affairs, public transport, dental health, economic development and regional planning, including the development of the road system. Hordaland County Council is involved in many international projects and activi- ties. Our region has signed cooperation agreements with several partner regions abroad. The «Hordaland class» programme gives an opportunity for Upper secondary school students in Hordaland, to study in several of these partner regions for one school year. We also cooperate with other countries as a member of European organisations. The County Mayor of Hordaland has been elected as president of the North Sea Commission and the NSC secretariat has been set up in Hordaland. We are also member of West Norway Office, one of six Norwegian regional offices in Brussels. EU-programmes such as Interreg and Erasmus+ are among the most important tools for internationalisation in Hordaland. Hordaland County Council publishes an International Newsletter twice a year, giving you a short introduction to the county’s international activities over the previous six months. The list is not extensive, but nevertheless we hope it gives an idea of the breadth of international activities that take place within our region. All photos are produced by Hordaland County Council, unless otherwise stated. For more information: www.hordaland.no/internasjonalt Editor: [email protected] Front page: Finnish pupils visited Hordaland in November 2015, in connection with the Erasmus+ strategic partnership project “The City Rings“, coordinated by Laksevåg Upper Secondary School.
    [Show full text]
  • Naturressurskartlegging I Kommunene Sund, Fjell Og Øygarden
    Naturressurskartlegging i kommunene Sund, Fjell og Øygarden: Miljøkvalitet i vassdrag Rapport nr. 93, november 1993. Naturressurskartlegging i kommunene Sund, Fjell og Øygarden: Miljøkvalitet i vassdrag. Geir Helge Johnsen og Annie Bjørklund Rapport nr. 93, november 1993. RAPPORTENS TITTEL: Naturressurskartlegging i kommunene Sund, Fjell og Øygarden: Miljøkvalitet i vassdrag. FORFATTERE: Dr.philos. Geir Helge Johnsen og cand.scient. Annie Bjørklund OPPDRAGSGIVER: Sund, Fjell og Øygarden kommuner. OPPDRAGET GITT: ARBEIDET UTFØRT: RAPPORT DATO: 15.juni 1993 August - oktober 1993 3.november 1993 RAPPORT NR: ANTALL SIDER: ISBN NR: 93 75 ISBN 82-7658-013-0 RAPPORT SAMMENDRAG: Foreliggende informasjon vedrørende miljøkvalitet i vassdragene er sammenstilt og vurdert med hensyn på brukskvalitet. Opplysningene er hentet fra mange kilder, men det meste av vannkvalitetsinformasjonen er fra de rutinemessige drikkevannsundersøkelsene. Regionen er rik på småvassdrag, men forsuringen truer en lang rekke av fiskebestandene,- med unntak av vannkilder der det ennå finnes bufferkapasitet igjen. Enkelte brukeres "monopolisering" av hele vassdrag skaper også problem, ved at demninger eller andre stengsler hindrer annen utnyttelse av ressursene. Drikkevannskvaliteten i regionen er i utgangspunktet heller ikke god. Vannet fra de aller fleste råvannskildene bør alkaliseres, men særlig problematisk er det høye innholdet av humusstoffer. Dette medfører problemer av estetisk karakter, og skaper til dels betydelige problemer for de vanligste desinfiseringsmetodene.
    [Show full text]
  • Loddefjord.Pdf
    Kvarven Skoltegrunnskaien Nordnes N E Askøybrua I E V K I V Gravdalsneset Brøstaneset E L Lyreneset Å K S Til Askøy L Y Kjøkkelvika S R Gravdalsbukten J E Olderneset Ø N Skålevik K N E R Y S I G V G E Å W S I R A S E D L K N L S E O S Nøstet V U M L N E I S K V N D L V V I E IE Å B E E I E G Y I N E J E V - N A S H N Å N C E J G V I S O O A Kjøkkelvik E G B T R V IN L E Sydnes U K A N I R P K R S V N S S E E O V N Puddefjorden Gjerdingen L Olsvik F E M G Holen S S ÆS I E O L L N V V K E L E E I S T I K R I E Skåleviksvatnet A F S E J R U W E Å M V Nygård N S M L E E S L I E S L K E N I E L L T V N V V A E E E L I Y E K Y R S I W Ø Gravdal N R N V K K E A G I J K S E Ørnafjellet J M B Laksevåg A N Nybø K Å S Ø L Leirvika S S B A V E I E R N L E I Bjørkelia R E E E N K N IE V D N K E N I O B E D K E L E G S N B F S R S Å E O L V T G Ø A A D K I R V I K N E D T S G Engdal L R V V E T YD I E E E O Damsgård K E RH I L S OR K N J A V NS S N L E VE V I T N D E EN A V E O E E I D E E U I B I I E T O E T L O B N N S N E A N L SOTRA V IK I S N R VEIE R K N E T Godvik V E E S I S Ø V K E I S N B D V S I K J N K Å E Banurda A L Tollneset V I T N V M N O E K L R I E IE S G M I E V N Nygård G I E E N E V S Å N E S I N N L R I E T K V D O S I V S Breidvika A N N R L E B K B Fagerdalen O I I R E E I H E V E R N E Krabbedalen R R E S S N I D V U G Y O G I L K N L N E I N S B A Ø H T R N E T B N R V A Ø I T L Ø E P Ørjebekken R U L L Nordre Drotningsvik A N Myra L O E E G A E D N R N N V K D L G K D D E E I Y I I A Lyngbødalen P Ø I Å V E L L N E I L E
    [Show full text]
  • Zoning Plan for Parts of Bergen Airport, Flesland Proposer's Plan Description and Impact Assessment
    ZONING PLAN FOR PARTS OF BERGEN AIRPORT, FLESLAND PROPOSER’S PLAN DESCRIPTION AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVISED FOR 2ND READING DATED 30 MARCH 2012 ZONING PLAN (DETAIL PLAN) W/ IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR BERGEN AIRPORT, FLESLAND, LAND NO. 109, TITLE NO. 14 ET AL. AVINOR AS P.O. BOX 150 2061 Gardermoen Switchboard: +47 815 30 550 Fax: +47 64 81 20 01 E-mail: [email protected] www.avinor.no Org.no: 985198292 Contact person: Project director Alf Sognefest REPORT TITLE Zoning plan (detail plan) w/ Impact assessment for Bergen Airport, Norconsult AS, Main office Flesland, land no. 109, title no. 14 et al. P.O. Box 626, 1303 SANDVIKA Vestfjordgaten 4, 1338 SANDVIKA Phone: +47 67 57 10 00 CLIENT Fax: 67 54 45 76 Avinor AS E-mail: [email protected] www.norconsult.no CLIENT’S CONTACT PERSON Bus. reg. no.: NO 962392687 VAT Project director Alf Sognefest ASSIGNMENT NO. DOCUMENT NUMBER PREPARED 5008543 01 Mona Hermansen DATE REVISION TECHNICAL QUALITY CONTROL 12 May 2011 01 Ragne Rommetveit 11 July 2011 02 30 March 2012 03 NUMBER OF PAGES APPROVED 140 Ragne Rommetveit 2 1 BACKGROUND AND REASON FOR DRAFT PLAN - SUMMARY Avinor hereby submits a proposal for a zoning plan for parts of the landside at Bergen Airport Flesland. Implementation of this plan ensures that Bergen Airport, Flesland will not be a limiting factor in the positive development for citizens, public activities as well as business and tourism in Bergen and the Western Region. The plan furthermore facilitates increasing the public transport share of traffic to the airport by the construction of a light rail transit (LRT) station at the airport, integrated in the air terminal.
    [Show full text]
  • Economy, Magic and the Politics of Religious Change in Pre-Modern
    1 Economy, magic and the politics of religious change in pre-modern Scandinavia Hugh Atkinson Department of Scandinavian Studies University College London Thesis submitted for the degree of PhD 28th May 2020 I, Hugh Atkinson, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that these sources have been acknowledged in the thesis. 2 Abstract This dissertation undertook to investigate the social and religious dynamic at play in processes of religious conversion within two cultures, the Sámi and the Scandinavian (Norse). More specifically, it examined some particular forces bearing upon this process, forces originating from within the cultures in question, working, it is argued, to dispute, disrupt and thereby counteract the pressures placed upon these indigenous communities by the missionary campaigns each was subjected to. The two spheres of dispute or ambivalence towards the abandonment of indigenous religion and the adoption of the religion of the colonial institution (the Church) which were examined were: economic activity perceived as unsustainable without the 'safety net' of having recourse to appeal to supernatural powers to intervene when the economic affairs of the community suffered crisis; and the inheritance of ancestral tradition. Within the indigenous religious tradition of the Sámi communities selected as comparanda for the purposes of the study, ancestral tradition was embodied, articulated and transmitted by particular supernatural entities, personal guardian spirits. Intervention in economic affairs fell within the remit of these spirits, along with others, which may be characterized as guardian spirits of localities, and guardian spirits of particular groups of game animals (such as wild reindeer, fish).
    [Show full text]
  • Or 71/2008 O 2008 November 978 978
    NILU: NILU: NILU: OR 71/2008 REFERENCE: O-108031 OR 71/2008 DATE: NOVEMBER 2008 ISBN: 978-82-425-2038-8 (print) 978-82-425-2039-5 (electronic) CO2 on the way to School English summary of final report assessing the 2007 Norwegian student-based web campaign Georg Hansen and Scott Randall 2 Preface Student research campaigns (forskningskampanjer) have been an annual event in connection to Research Days (Forskningsdagene) since 2003 in Norway. The campaigns invite students from all over the country to participate in a common scientific research event, always connected to a special environmentally related theme – for example Air Quality in the Classroom (2003), Pollution along Roads (2004), Bacteria in Drinking Water (2005), and The Rain Check (2006). The year 2007 was overshadowed by the topic of climate change, and the specific role of humans. The theme for the 2007 campaign fit well into this focus: the release of carbon dioxide in connection with transport of the students to and from school. In contrast to earlier research campaigns, the 2007 campaign placed less weight on measurements and technical activities, and more weight towards consciousness and understanding of the climate problem at the local and global scale. The campaign included (for the first time with such a large participation) a questionnaire related to the students relationship to the climate problem…something which has been traditionally seen as irrelevant to the official climate discussion. We would like to sincerely thank all of the schools which participated, both the teachers as driving forces, and the students as willing participants. We are certain that the results of the campaign will be of great interest to a large sector of climate researchers.
    [Show full text]
  • A Pilot Study of Lumpfish (Cyclopterus Lumpus )
    A pilot study of lumpfish (Cyclopterus lumpus) skin health, reared with three different treatments in land-based facilities and commercial net-pens by Frida Sol Meland Svendsen Supervisor: prof. Karin Anna Pittman Thesis for the degree Master of Science in Aquaculture Biology Department of Biological Sciences UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN © Frida Sol Meland Svendsen University of Bergen, 2021 Acknowledgements This thesis was supported by different research projects whom I give my sincere thanks. The first project “Kan tare gi bedre fiskehelse for rognkjeks i oppdrett?” was funded by regional research funds (RFF) Agder county municipality through “Blått kompetansesenter sør” and was owned by Landbasert Akvakultur Norge AS. The seconds research project “Seaweed Symbiosis - bedret velferd og overlevelse for rognkjeks ved bruk av naturlige tareskjul” (project number 317935) was funded by RFF Vestland, and the project owner was Engesund oppdrett AS. First of all, I would like to express my deepest gratitude to my supervisor Karin Pittman. Without her guidance, encouragement and overall enthusiastic being, the process of working with this thesis would not be the same. Her constant positivity and curiosity have lifted my spirit more times than I can count, and I am ever so grateful for the wave of wisdom sha has shared with me. Secondly, I would like to thank Mearge Okubamichael and Grigory Merkin at the Quantidoc lab, for the hospitality and help they have shown me with the mucosal analysis and statistics. I would also like to thank Bettina Wickman Kvamme for the engaging conversations and nice company during our sampling trips to Austevoll. Further I would like to give a huge thanks to the “masters in mucous” group, for the interesting discussions we have had and the small sense of sanity our weekly meetings through a year much stripped off human interactions and routine, have given me (#Covid19).
    [Show full text]
  • Soppliste for Vestnes
    KARTLEGGING AV BIOLOGISK MANGFALD I VESTNES KOMMUNE, MØRE OG ROMSDAL av John Bjarne Jordal Vestnes kommune 2003 Forfattar: John Bjarne Jordal 6610 Øksendal Telefon 71 69 54 45 epost: [email protected] Kan siterast fritt når ein viser til kjelde. Rapporten kan bestillast fra: Vestnes kommune 6390 Åndalsnes Telefon 71 18 40 00 Denne rapporten kan refererast som: Jordal, J. B., 2003: Kartlegging av biologisk mangfald i Vestnes kommune, Møre og Romsdal. Vestnes kommune, rapport. 114 s. + kart. ISBN 82-993116-1-6. Framsidefoto, øvst: Feøya har mange kvalitetar, m.a. som naturbeitemark og hekkeområde for sjøfugl. Framsidefoto, nedst: Tresfjordleira er eit av dei store elveos-områda i fylket. Foto: John Bjarne Jordal. 1 FØREORD Prosjektet kartlegging av biologisk mangfald i Vestnes kommune ligg no føre i rapportform. Bakgrunnen for prosjektet er konvensjonen om biologisk mangfald som vart vedteken på verdskonferansen i Rio de Janeiro i 1992. Som ein følgje av dette har Stortinget vedteke at alle norske kommunar innan 2003 skal ha kartlagt det biologiske mangfaldet i sitt område. Arbeidet i Vestnes er utført av biolog John Bjarne Jordal på oppdrag av Vestnes kommune og etter retningsliner frå Direktoratet for Naturforvaltning. Ein ønskjer å takka alle som har hjelpt til undervegs i arbeidet. Vi har no eit langt betre grunnlag til å kunne ta vare på naturverdiane i Vestnes kommune. Rapporten bør nyttast av alle som arbeider med planarbeid i kommunen. Rapporten bør ellers vere nyttig for skuleverket, foreiningar innan natur og friluftsliv og einskildpersonar som er opptekne av å ta vare på mangfaldet i naturen i Vestnes. For Vestnes kommune John-Ole Aarsæther skogansvarleg 2 INNHALD SAMANDRAG .....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Churches in Finnmark County and the Torne Region in the Early Modern Period 47
    Churches in Finnmark County and the Torne Region in the Early Modern Period 47 Siv Rasmussen Churches in Finnmark County and the Torne Region in the Early Modern Period Introduction This article focuses on the availability of church buildings for the Sámi in Finn- mark County (Denmark-Norway) and the Torne region (Sweden) in the early modern period until the first half of the 1700s. Based on a survey in the current article of the known ecclesiastical buildings in the two regions in the period, the following five questions will be discussed: What kinds of buildings were used as churches? Were some of them primarily built for the non-Sámi population and others mainly for the Sámi? How often did the Sámi visit the churches? Were the availability of churches similar in Finnmark County and the Torne region? Were some Sámi linked with churches in both Norway and Sweden? After a short discussion of the religious and political background of the establishment of the churches, most of the article deals with presentations of each church rela- ted to their respective parishes in the two regions – first Finnmark, then Torne. Finally, the problems presented above will be discussed. In the period discussed in this article, the early modern period, the ma- jority of the Sámi population in Finnmark County was coastal Sámi. A smal- ler group was the reindeer-nomads who used the interior in the winter and coastal areas in the summer season as grazing land. Most of the non-Sámi population lived in fishing villages along the outer coast, but an expansion into the fjords from the non-Sámi group took place in this period.
    [Show full text]