DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Justice and the City: Full Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Justice and the City: Full Report Environmental Justice and the City: Full Report Simin Davoudi and Elizabeth Brooks October 2012 Environmental Justice and the City Environmental Justice and the City: Full Report Simin Davoudi and Elizabeth Brooks Global Urban Research Unit School of Architecture, Planning and Landscape Newcastle University October 2012 Study commissioned by Newcastle City Council and funded by the Institute for Local Governance to inform the work of Newcastle City Council’s Fairness Commission Global Urban Research Unit i Simin Davoudi is Professor of Environmental Policy and Planning at the School of Architecture, Planning and Landscape and the Theme Coordinator for Environmental Justice and Governance at Newcastle Institute for Research on Sustainability, at Newcastle University. She is past President of the Association of the European Schools of Planning and an elected member of the Academy of Social Sciences. Simin has led the UK Office of the Deputy Prime Minister’s Planning Research Network and served as member of: expert panels for three UK government departments (DCLG, DEFRA, DECC), the ESRC Grant Assessment Panel, the Research Excellence Framework Sub-Panel in the UK and in several other European countries, the RTPI’s Research and Knowledge Committee, the Expert Groups for two European Commission Directorate Generals (Environment and Regional Policy, and Presidency Seminars), the Advisory Boards of the Irish Social Science Platform, University of Hong Kong, and BTH Swedish School of Planning. Simin has held visiting professorships at the universities of Amsterdam, Karlskrona and Nijmegen. She is one of the editors of the Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, a founding member of the editorial team of the Journal of the Academy of Social Sciences, and on the editorial boards of 10 international journals. Her research, which focuses largely on planning and environmental governance, has been funded by a range of international and national research funding bodies and is published widely. For more details please see: http://www.ncl.ac.uk/guru/staff/ profile/simin.davoudi Elizabeth Brooks is a Research Associate at the School of Architecture, Planning and Landscape at Newcastle University, where she completed a PhD in 2009, joint-funded by the ESRC and the Department of Communities and Local Government. She is currently employed on an EU Framework Programme 7 project running from 2012-2015, to which she is contributing support on stakeholder involvement and environmental governance. She has recently worked on the democratic and justice implications of the new Neighbourhood Planning policy in England and contributed to an EPSRC-funded project on Climate Change Adaptation. Working in research since 1996, she has contributed to research studies on a diverse range of topics including older people, housing and community care, for bodies including government departments, universities and NGOs. For more details see: http://www.ncl.ac.uk/apl/ staff/profile/elizabeth.brooks#tab_profile. ii Newcastle University Environmental Justice and the City Acknowledgements We would like to thank the Institute for Local Governance for funding this study and Newcastle City Council for commissioning and providing support throughout the study. At the preparatory stages of the study, we were given practical support and advice by Philip Hunter, Head of Policy and Research, and Adrian McLoughlin, Climate Change Officer, at Newcastle City Council. We were also supported by discussions with Dr Lucy Grimshaw, School of Social Sciences and Law, Teeside University. We owe thanks to: James O’Brien, PhD student, School of Civil Engineering and Geosciences and Dr Claire Walsh, Research Associate, School of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, for providing GIS support and maps, and Professor Tanja Pless-Mulloli, Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University for commenting on the first draft of the air pollution section of the report. We would also like to thank the council officers who generously gave their time and took part in interviews for this study. We benefited from the discussions in the two roundtable events which we organised as part of this study. We are grateful to those who took part and particularly the following speakers (in order of appearance): 24 November 2011 Workshop • Chair: Professor Simin Davoudi (NIReS Justice and Governance Theme) • Philip Hunter (Head of Policy and Research, Newcastle City Council) • Dr Paul Crawshaw (Social Futures Institute, Teesside University) • Dr Lucy Grimshaw (School of Social Sciences and Law, Teesside University) • Dr Jane Midgley (School of Architecture Planning and Landscape, Newcastle University) • Professor David Schlosberg (University of Sydney, Visiting Professor, SAPL, Newcastle University) 22 March 2012 Workshop • Chair: Professor Paul Younger (Newcastle Institute for Research on Sustainability, NReS) • Professor William Rees (University of British Columbia, Visiting Professor, SAPL, Newcastle University) • Adrian McLoughlin (Newcastle City Council) • Professor Tanja Pless-Mulloli (Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University) • Dr Derek Bell (School of Geography, Politics and Sociology, Newcastle University) Finally, we would like to thank Minh Dung Le for his support with designing both this document and the brief Executive Summary version of it. (Please refer to the end of this report for details of how to obtain the Executive Summary). Disclaimer The opinions expressed in this report are entirely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of those acknowledged above. Global Urban Research Unit iii Environmental Justice and the City Table of Contents 1. Introduction 3 1.1 Why does environmental justice matter? 4 1.2 Assessing environmental justice 5 1.3 About this report 6 2. On Justice 9 2.1 Distributive justice and the question of a ‘fair’ share 10 2.2 Beyond distributive justice: recognition, capabilities and responsibilities 12 2.3 A framework for understanding and advancing fairness 13 3. Environmental Justice 15 3.1 Origin and history 16 3.2 Continuing injustices 17 3.3 Definition and substantive scope 18 3.4 Sustainability and justice 19 3.5 Beyond distribution: recognition, capabilities and participation 19 4. Newcastle City 23 4.1 From cradle of the industrial revolution to green capital 24 4.2 Demography 25 4.3 Income, employment and qualifications 26 4.4 Deprivation, inequalities and neighbourhood health differential 27 4.5 Health 29 4.6 Crime 29 4.7 Environment 30 iv Newcastle University Environmental Justice and the City 5. Distribution of Environmental Burdens 33 5.1 Air pollution 36 5.2 Landfills and hazardous sites 44 5.3 Rundown neighbourhoods 52 5.4 Poor housing conditions 61 5.5 Road traffic accidents 69 6. Distribution of Environmental Benefits 79 6.1 Urban green and open spaces 82 6.2 Natural places: nature reserves, woodlands and allotments 94 6.3 Blue spaces and water 101 6.4 Local public transport 110 6.5 Affordable warmth 119 6.6 ‘Green’ jobs 131 7. Procedural Justice, Participation and Access to Information 139 8. Bibliography 142 Global Urban Research Unit v Photo by Minh Dung Le 2 Newcastle University Introduction SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION The current financial crisis is driving environmental terms in Newcastle. many government policies in the UK and To fill the gap, this study has been elsewhere. However, economics alone commissioned by the Council and funded cannot decide what policy changes the by the Institute for Local Governance. government should make. At its best, It aims to examine a range of issues in economics can tell us the effects of relation to environmental justice in order seeking alternative policies, but without to inform and complement the work of the being guided by a set of normative Fairness Commission. principles, it cannot provide guidance on The report has seven main sections. which policy to pursue. At the heart of Following this introduction, Section Two such normative principles is the pursuit of briefly outlines different interpretations justice and fairness. This is acknowledged of justice and fairness and clarifies the by Newcastle City Council (NCC) which position adopted in this study. Section has established a Fairness Commission to Three provides an overview of the develop a set of guiding principles for the history of environmental justice, and its governance of the City at a time of financial definitions and perspectives. In Section austerity. This stems from a desire to Four a brief profile of Newcastle upon ensure equitable access to services while Tyne is presented, focusing particularly continuing to prioritise those most in need. on spatial differentiations and inequalities It will entail understanding the nature in the city. Sections Five and Six present of the challenges ahead and exploring our empirical work in relation to the how the powers and resources of the socio-spatial distribution of, respectively, Council alongside those of other public environmental burdens and benefits in agencies and the private and voluntary Newcastle. Section Seven focuses on sectors can be deployed to address them procedural justice and the significance in an innovative and effective manner. of participation both in decision- The focus of the Fairness Commission making processes and in contributing is on socio-economic issues. However, to sustainability. A full bibliography is it is strongly recognised by the Council provided in Section Eight. that these issues cannot be examined fully without considering
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Visitor Guide 2010
    VisitorVisitor GuideGuide 2010 Free to you • FREE PULL OUT WALKING GUIDE INSIDE • • WHAT TO DO • WHERE TO GO • KIDS PAGE • WILDLIFE • EVENTS • www.northumberlandnationalpark.org.uk Welcome Vision for the future in Free to you! Northumberland National Park National Parks are ‘Britain's Breathing Spaces’ and Northumberland National Park with its distinctive open and tranquil landscapes and unique heritage will provide you with wonderful memories to savour. Stretching from Hadrian's Wall in the south, through the rolling valleys of the Tyne and Rede to the impressive hills of the Cheviots on the Scottish Border, the National Park has some of the most unspoilt landscapes in the country. Hadrian’s Wall page 6, page 11 Its’ wealth of history and culture has been shaped by a past that was Tony Gates, National Park Officer Chief Executive NNPA not always peaceful.The landscape of the National Park as it is today has been formed over centuries - from Iron Age hillforts to the legacy Northumberland National Park is a of the Romans, through the Middle Ages to the Victorian industrial age - special place and we have a vision for the 405 scenic square miles and the evidence is everywhere. (1049km2) of this protected landscape that we share with the many people In this Visitor Guide you will see how the National Park Authority, who helped us to develop our latest landowners, farmers, businesses and other organisations are all working Management Plan. to ensure that Northumberland National Park remains one of Britain's Our vision is that Northumberland most beautiful breathing spaces for everyone to enjoy.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview and Scrutiny Committee 23 February 2017 'Let's Talk Transport
    Overview and Scrutiny Committee 23 February 2017 ‘Let’s talk transport – Re-Newcastle’ – development programme update Graham Grant, Head of Transport Investment, Place Directorate 1. Summary 1.1 This report is to provide an update to the Overview and Scrutiny (O&S) Committee on the themes of work identified in the ‘Let’s Talk Transport – Re-Newcastle’ report of July 2014 and subsequent Cabinet reports including March and November 2016. 2. Introduction 2.1 In July 2014, a report to the Council Cabinet noted that our Local Plan recognises that an improved transport network is fundamentally important to the future economic growth and liveability of Newcastle. The paper outlined an approach to take forward the Council’s commitment to upgrade our transport system by helping people to move more freely around, across and within the city. 2.2 In line with the transparent and democratic processes of the Council, the work associated with progressing these recommendations are subject to regular review by the Overview and Scrutiny Committee. 3. North East Local Growth Deal schemes 3.1 Following recent announcements by government about Local Growth Deal funding the North East Local Enterprise Partnership (the LEP) are conducting a review of the existing Growth Deal programme. Newcastle City Council, along with all other partners in the North East Combined Authority area are taking part in this review. 3.2 Newcastle City Council originally secured funding for four transport schemes through the first round of the North East Local Growth Deal. The Full Business Case for Scotswood Bridgehead has been submitted and will be assessed against the North East Combined Authority’s assurance framework.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Framework Directive) (England and Wales) Directions 2009
    The River Basin Districts Typology, Standards and Groundwater threshold values (Water Framework Directive) (England and Wales) Directions 2009 The Secretary of State and the Welsh Ministers, with the agreement of the Secretary of State to the extent that there is any effect in England or those parts of Wales that are within the catchment areas of the rivers Dee, Wye and Severn, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 40(2) of the Environment Act 1995(a) and now vested in them(b), and having consulted the Environment Agency, hereby give the following Directions to the Environment Agency for the implementation of Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy(c): Citation and commencement and extent 1.—(1) These Directions may be cited as the River Basin Districts Typology, Standards and Groundwater threshold values (Water Framework Directive) (England and Wales) Direction 2009 and shall come into force on 22nd December 2009. Interpretation 2.—(1) In these Directions— ―the Agency‖ means the Environment Agency; ―the Groundwater Directive‖ means Directive 2006/118/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of groundwater against pollution and deterioration(d); ―the Priority Substances Directive‖ means Directive 2008/105/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on environmental quality standards in the field of water policy(e); ―threshold value‖ has the same meaning as in the Groundwater Directive; and ―the Directive‖ means Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23rd October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Election Results 2007
    Local Election Results 3rd May 2007 Tyne and Wear Andrew Teale Version 0.05 April 29, 2009 2 LOCAL ELECTION RESULTS 2007 Typeset by LATEX Compilation and design © Andrew Teale, 2007. The author grants permission to copy and distribute this work in any medium, provided this notice is preserved. This file (in several formats) is available for download from http://www.andrewteale.me.uk/ Please advise the author of any corrections which need to be made by email: [email protected] Chapter 4 Tyne and Wear 4.1 Gateshead Birtley Deckham Neil Weatherley Lab 1,213 Bernadette Oliphant Lab 1,150 Betty Gallon Lib 814 Daniel Carr LD 398 Andrea Gatiss C 203 Allan Davidson C 277 Kevin Scott BNP 265 Blaydon (2) Malcolm Brain Lab 1,338 Dunston and Teams Stephen Ronchetti Lab 1,047 Mark Gardner LD 764 Maureen Clelland Lab 940 Colin Ball LD 543 Michael Ruddy LD 357 Trevor Murray C 182 Andrew Swaddle BNP 252 Margaret Bell C 179 Bridges Bob Goldsworthy Lab 888 Dunston Hill and Whickham East Peter Andras LD 352 George Johnson BNP 213 Yvonne McNicol LD 1,603 Ada Callanan C 193 Gary Haley Lab 1,082 John Callanan C 171 Chopwell and Rowlands Gill Saira Munro BNP 165 Michael McNestry Lab 1,716 Raymond Callender LD 800 Maureen Moor C 269 Felling Kenneth Hutton BNP 171 Paul McNally Lab 1,149 David Lucas LD 316 Chowdene Keith McFarlane BNP 205 Steve Wraith C 189 Keith Wood Lab 1,523 Daniel Duggan C 578 Glenys Goodwill LD 425 Terrence Jopling BNP 231 High Fell Malcolm Graham Lab 1,100 Crawcrook and Greenside Ann McCarthy LD 250 Derek Anderson LD 1,598 Jim Batty UKIP 194 Helen Hughes Lab 1,084 June Murray C 157 Leonard Davidson C 151 Ronald Fairlamb BNP 151 48 4.1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rare Plant Register of South Northumberland (VC67) 2010 Quentin J
    The Rare Plant Register of South Northumberland (VC67) 2010 Quentin J. Groom and A. John Richards Introduction The Vice-County Rare Plant Registers are an initiative of the Botanical Society of the British Isles to summarise the status of rare and conservation-worthy plants in each vice-county. The intention is to create an up-to-date summary of the sites of rare plants and their status at these sites. Rare Plant Registers intend to identify gaps in our knowledge, aid conservation efforts and encourage monitoring of our rare plants. Criteria for Inclusion The guidelines of the BSBI were followed in the production of this Rare Plant Register. All native vascular plants with a national status of “rare” (found in 1-15 hectads in Britain) or “scarce” (found in 16-100 hectads in Britain) are included even if that species is not native to South Northumberland. In addition, all native species locally rare or scarce in South Northumberland are included, as are extinct native species. These guidelines were occasionally relaxed to include some local specialities and hybrids of note. We would have liked to restrict the list to current sites for each species. However, in many cases, there is too little up-to-date information to make this possible. The listed sites are those where the species might still exist or has existed recently. In most cases, a site is included if a species has been recorded there since 1970. Sites without detailed locality information or of dubious provenance are not included. Where possible, we have tried to show the known history of a site by noting the date of first and last record.
    [Show full text]
  • Gap Analysis
    Tyne Catchment Partnership – Gap analysis The Gap Analysis was undertaken in autumn 2014 ready for a Tyne Catchment Partnership meeting on 10th December 2014, in Gateshead Civic Centre. These notes are a ‘write up’ of the Gap Analysis, with some additional information since. The meeting notes are more a summary of the discussion (and can be read with this document) – these notes are the detail behind the maps that were on the table. Generally, the picture that emerged is the collective knowledge of the Tyne Catchment Partnership. However, without everybody having detailed knowledge of each project, it was difficult to assess to what extent a project is addressing the base problems. Executive Summary The ‘Gap Analysis’ on the Tyne Catchment Plan was undertaken in autumn 2014. 5 sets of base maps were produced, based on the Plan’s goals. These were overlaid with existing projects and partnerships, to see where there might be issues with no projects or partnership. Findings On the topic of pollution, there are lots of initiatives working in the urban area, which need co-ordination. Potential ‘gaps’ in the coverage of projects were Newburn (urbanisation issues); March Burn (phosphate); Derwent Reservoir (phosphorous related problems, linked to impoundments); Colt Crag reservoir, Hallington Reservoir, sediment monitoring at 3 loughs on the Roman Wall. Elsewhere, some initiatives are taking place where the base map hadn’t noted any issues. On the topic of mines / minerals, many organisations are working together and programming activity. The link between mines / minewaters and calaminarian grasslands (and linking to the wider Tyne Sediments Plan) might be a good Partnership project for further detailed thought, to see if there are still ‘gaps’ to address or timescales to plan for.
    [Show full text]
  • Newcastle and Gateshead Leisure Study
    Newcastle and Gateshead Leisure Study Newcastle City Council & Gateshead Council April 2010 Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Overview.............................................................................................................. 4 1.2 Objectives ............................................................................................................ 4 1.3 Definition of leisure .............................................................................................. 5 1.4 Report structure ................................................................................................... 5 2 National and Regional Policy Requirements................................................................. 6 2.2 Planning Policy Statement 4 ............................................................................... 6 2.3 Planning Policy Statement 12 ........................................................................... 10 2.4 The North East of England Plan: Regional Spatial Strategy to 2021 ................ 12 2.5 Community Strategy .......................................................................................... 14 3 The leisure sector in Newcastle and Gateshead ........................................................ 15 3.1 Background ....................................................................................................... 15 3.2 Leisure Market overview ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • River Rede Restoration Work Starts at Smoutel Ford
    NEWS RELEASE RR04: 19 August 2019 River Rede Restoration Work Starts at Smoutel Ford River restoration work starts this week at Smoutel Ford, West Woodburn. Revitalising Redesdale Partnership will rebuild the historic bridleway across the Rede valley, allowing walkers and riders to enjoy trails between Monkridge Hill and Otterburn for the first time in decades. The river crossing at Smoutel Ford was lost because so much stone and gravel was removed from the river during the 1950s. Revitalising Redesdale’s work will reintroduce about 1400 tonnes of boulder and cobble sized stone to the river bed to create the Ford and associated features. The aim is to reinvigorate the river flow in this over-deepened part of the channel. This will provide healthier habitat for fish, river flies and our iconic Rede species, the endangered freshwater pearl mussel. The contractor team, led by Groundwork North East & Cumbria, have developed the project with strong support from local landowners. The project has been made possible with funding from The National Lottery Heritage Fund, the Environment Agency and Northumberland County Council, through an active partnership led by Natural England and Northumberland Wildlife Trust. This work will restore the Rede along one of the most degraded stretches where there are not enough gravels upstream to sustain the natural riverbed. As well as improving access for people across the river, this action will benefit river ecology beyond the 300m restored length. The Smoutel Ford project will be completed in October 2019 with further associated work planned for 2020. Additional riverside projects are taking place across the catchment as part of Revitalising Redesdale Programme 2018-2023.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Organisation Submissions to the Newcastle City Council Electoral Review
    Local Organisation submissions to the Newcastle City Council electoral review This PDF document contains submissions from Local Organisations. Some versions of Adobe allow the viewer to move quickly between bookmarks. Friends of the Valley and the Little Dene Chairperson: Audrey Kingham, Secretary: John Stephenson, To: The Review Officer (Newcastle upon Tyne), Local Government Boundary Commission for England, 14th Floor Millbank Tower, 21-24 Millbank, London SW1P 4QP 3rd April 2016 Dear Sir/Madam Consultation on Ward Arrangement – Newcastle Upon Tyne I am responding to the above consultation as the secretary of Friends of the Valley and the Little Dene (FOVALD), an organisation based in High West Jesmond, Newcastle upon Tyne. We adopted a local open space in our neighbourhood in 2000 and we have been maintaining it, improving it and holding community events on it since then. The space provides recreational opportunities mainly for residents and families living in our neighbourhood (see attached plan). FOVALD is open to all neighbourhood residents. We were consulted by the City Council on the proposals to adjust the ward boundaries in February last. Our neighbourhood is currently in East Gosforth ward and the initial proposal was to take our community out of the Gosforth ward and attach it to communities further east, i.e. towards High Heaton & Benton. In terms of general services, our community links are north-south – we have strong links with Gosforth as well as Jesmond. Therefore, we commented that, from a community perspective, we thought the proposal would have a negative impact and suggested that High West Jesmond be included in either the Gosforth or Jesmond wards.
    [Show full text]
  • Newcastle City Council Election Results 1973-2012
    Newcastle City Council Election Results 1973-2012 Colin Rallings and Michael Thrasher The Elections Centre Plymouth University The information contained in this report has been obtained from a number of sources. Election results from the immediate post-reorganisation period were painstakingly collected by Alan Willis largely, although not exclusively, from local newspaper reports. From the mid- 1980s onwards the results have been obtained from each local authority by the Elections Centre. The data are stored in a database designed by Lawrence Ware and maintained by Brian Cheal and others at Plymouth University. Despite our best efforts some information remains elusive whilst we accept that some errors are likely to remain. Notice of any mistakes should be sent to [email protected]. The results sequence can be kept up to date by purchasing copies of the annual Local Elections Handbook, details of which can be obtained by contacting the email address above. Front cover: the graph shows the distribution of percentage vote shares over the period covered by the results. The lines reflect the colours traditionally used by the three main parties. The grey line is the share obtained by Independent candidates while the purple line groups together the vote shares for all other parties. Rear cover: the top graph shows the percentage share of council seats for the main parties as well as those won by Independents and other parties. The lines take account of any by- election changes (but not those resulting from elected councillors switching party allegiance) as well as the transfers of seats during the main round of local election.
    [Show full text]
  • Electoral Review of Newcastle Our Council
    Electoral review of Newcastle Our council: Fit for the future Evidence to support the Local Government Boundary Commission for England’s consideration of the appropriate number of councillors for Newcastle City Council Presented by Newcastle City Council’s Constitutional Committee 0 Contents Background: Electoral review of Newcastle 2 Section One: Our council size proposal 3 Section Two: About Newcastle 5 Section Three: Evidence relating to governance and decision making 12 Section Four: Evidence relating to scrutiny functions 33 Section Five: Evidence relating to the representational role of councillors 38 Section Six: Evidence relating to the future 50 Section Seven: Comparisons to similar authorities 55 Section Eight: Views of other interested stakeholders 57 Section Nine: Options considered 59 Section Ten: Conclusions 60 Appendix 1: Cabinet portfolios 63 Appendix 2: Details of North East Combined Authority and joint authorities / 66 committees Appendix 3: Schedules of appointments made by City Council 68 Appendix 4: Case studies provided by councillors 99 Appendix 5: Feedback received from other stakeholders 101 1 Background: Electoral review of Newcastle The Local Government Boundary Commission for England (the Commission) is undertaking an electoral review of Newcastle between November 2015 and September 2016. An electoral review examines a council’s electoral arrangements and aims to ensure, as far as possible, that the ratio of electors to councillors in each ward is the same. The review will cover: The total number of councillors to be elected to the council (council size); The number and boundaries of electoral areas (wards) for the purposes of the election of councillors; The number of councillors for any electoral area of a local authority; and The name of any electoral area.
    [Show full text]
  • Newcastle Ambulance Pickups
    Newcastle PCT Ambulance Call Outs by SOA Please note that due to boundary reviews not all SOAs are coterminous with wards and therefore only a proxy ward name has been supplied in the below table SOA Map SOA Callout Proxy Callout Number of Callouts code Location SOA Name Ward Code Proxy Ward Name 2009/10 1 E01008288 Newcastle upon Tyne 027A 00CJGD Benwell and Scotswood 2 2 E01008289 Newcastle upon Tyne 027B 00CJGD Benwell and Scotswood 5 3 E01008290 Newcastle upon Tyne 027C 00CJGD Benwell and Scotswood 13 4 E01008291 Newcastle upon Tyne 027D 00CJGL Elswick 21 5 E01008292 Newcastle upon Tyne 027E 00CJGD Benwell and Scotswood 1 6 E01008293 Newcastle upon Tyne 004A 00CJHF Woolsington 11 7 E01008294 Newcastle upon Tyne 001A 00CJGG Castle 2 8 E01008295 Newcastle upon Tyne 008A 00CJGP Kenton 6 9 E01008296 Newcastle upon Tyne 011A 00CJHF Woolsington 4 10 E01008297 Newcastle upon Tyne 011B 00CJGE Blakelaw 14 11 E01008298 Newcastle upon Tyne 011C 00CJHF Woolsington 11 12 E01008299 Newcastle upon Tyne 011D 00CJGE Blakelaw 13 13 E01008300 Newcastle upon Tyne 016A 00CJGE Blakelaw 6 14 E01008301 Newcastle upon Tyne 026A 00CJGF Byker 15 15 E01008302 Newcastle upon Tyne 026B 00CJGZ Walker 10 16 E01008303 Newcastle upon Tyne 018A 00CJGX South Heaton 33 17 E01008304 Newcastle upon Tyne 026C 00CJGX South Heaton 36 18 E01008305 Newcastle upon Tyne 026D 00CJGF Byker 28 19 E01008306 Newcastle upon Tyne 001B 00CJGG Castle 9 20 E01008307 Newcastle upon Tyne 001C 00CJGG Castle 3 21 E01008308 Newcastle upon Tyne 001D 00CJGG Castle 3 22 E01008309 Newcastle upon
    [Show full text]