UN Consolidated Relief Appeal 2004

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

UN Consolidated Relief Appeal 2004 In Tribute In 2003 many United Nations, International Organisation, and Non-Governmental Organisation staff members died while helping people in several countries struck by crisis. Scores more were attacked and injured. Aid agency staff members were abducted. Some continue to be held against their will. In recognition of our colleagues’ commitment to humanitarian action and pledging to continue the work we began together We dedicate this year’s appeals to them. FOR ADDITIONAL COPIES, PLEASE CONTACT: UN OFFICE FOR THE COORDINATION OF HUMANITARIAN AFFAIRS PALAIS DES NATIONS 8-14 AVENUE DE LA PAIX CH - 1211 GENEVA, SWITZERLAND TEL.: (41 22) 917.1972 FAX: (41 22) 917.0368 E-MAIL: [email protected] THIS DOCUMENT CAN ALSO BE FOUND ON HTTP://WWW.RELIEFWEB.INT/ UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, November 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..........................................................................................................................11 Table I. Summary of Requirements – By Appealing Organisation ........................................................12 2. YEAR IN REVIEW ....................................................................................................................................13 2.1 CHANGES IN THE HUMANITARIAN SITUATION ...........................................................................................13 2.2 FINANCIAL OVERVIEW...........................................................................................................................14 2.3 MONITORING REPORT AND MONITORING MATRIX ....................................................................................14 2.4 LESSONS IDENTIFIED............................................................................................................................18 3. HUMANITARIAN CONTEXT ................................................................................................................19 3.1 PROBLEM ANALYSIS.............................................................................................................................19 3.2 HUMANITARIAN PRINCIPLES AND HUMAN RIGHTS ....................................................................................20 3.3 CAPACITIES AND VULNERABILITIES ANALYSIS..........................................................................................21 4. SCENARIOS.........................................................................................................................................27 5. STRATEGIC GOALS............................................................................................................................27 6. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES.......................................................................................................28 7. COMPLEMENTARITY WITH OTHER ACTORS ..................................................................................29 8. RESPONSE PLANS.............................................................................................................................30 WATER AND ENVIRONMENTAL SANITATION ......................................................................................31 HEALTH AND NUTRITION.......................................................................................................................36 FOOD AID.................................................................................................................................................41 AGRICULTURE ........................................................................................................................................45 EDUCATION.............................................................................................................................................51 8.1 SECURITY..............................................................................................................................................54 9. STRATEGIC MONITORING .................................................................................................................54 10. CRITERIA FOR PRIORITISATION OF PROJECTS ............................................................................55 11. COORDINATION..................................................................................................................................56 Table II. Listing of Project Activities – By Appealing Organisation ........................................................57 Table III: Listing of Project Activities – By Sector ..................................................................................61 PROJECT SUMMARIES ..................................................................................................................................64 WATER AND ENVIRONMENTAL SANITATION...........................................................................................64 HEALTH AND NUTRITION ...........................................................................................................................73 FOOD AID...................................................................................................................................................102 AGRICULTURE ..........................................................................................................................................108 EDUCATION...............................................................................................................................................118 COORDINATION........................................................................................................................................120 ANNEX I. DONOR RESPONSE TO THE 2003 APPEAL...........................................................................123 ANNEX II. 2003 CAP MONITORING MATRIX............................................................................................134 ANNEX III. 2003 CAP PROGRESS REPORT – PROJECT ACTIVITIES ....................................................141 ANNEX IV. INTER-AGENCY FORUM..........................................................................................................149 ANNEX V. HUMANITARIAN AND DEVELOPMENT WORKING GROUP KEY IDENTIFIED LESSONS ..150 ANNEX VI. STATEMENT OF HUMANITARIAN PRINCIPLES – DPRK NOVEMBER 1998 .......................153 ANNEX VII. CONSENSUS STATEMENT OF ALL UN AGENCIES, NGOS AND DONOR AGENCIES OPERATING IN THE DPRK, NOVEMBER 1998 ...........................................................................................154 ANNEX VIII. CONSENSUS STATEMENT OF ALL UN AGENCIES, NGOS AND DONOR AGENCIES OPERATING IN THE DPRK, DECEMBER 1999 ...........................................................................................155 ANNEX IX. CONSENSUS STATEMENT OF ALL UN AGENCIES, NGOS AND DONOR AGENCIES OPERATING IN THE DPRK, MARCH 2001 ..................................................................................................156 ANNEX X. BILATERAL, MULTILATERAL AND NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANISATIONS..................158 ANNEX XI. POLICY STATEMENT FOR THE INTEGRATION OF A GENDER PERSPECTIVE IN HUMANITARIAN AND DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE IN DPRK ...............................................................168 ANNEX XII. INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF RED CROSS AND RED CRESCENT SOCIETIES .......170 ANNEX XIII. ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS.......................................................................................172 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The humanitarian response to the emergency in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) takes place against a backdrop of continuing economic difficulties and a weakened international response, both of which threaten to undermine the substantial gains that humanitarian assistance has achieved. The humanitarian emergency in the DPRK is not over. Assistance is still needed and continues to play a vital role in safeguarding and promoting the well being of millions whose nutritional status and general health would otherwise be seriously compromised. In the DPRK, health indicators have worsened. Nine per cent of children suffer from acute malnutrition, while chronic malnutrition (stunted growth) in some parts of the country, such as Ryanggang, is typically more than 45%. Anaemia is common, and is seen in 30% of pregnant women. The maternal mortality rate is of great concern, doubling since 1993. Despite being rich with water resources, many girls and women spend hours each day collecting water from unsafe sources because of a breakdown of water systems, and difficulties with electricity. Nonetheless in 2003, the international response has made considerable progress towards meeting some of the basic needs of the population. Chronic malnutrition dropped from 62% in 1998, to 42% in 2002. This can be attributed in part to the substantial humanitarian assistance provided by the international community, in particular food aid. In 2002, over 350,000 people benefited from improved water quantity and quality, reinforcing the gains in nutrition. Humanitarian assistance has supported the dramatic 72.3 % decrease in the number of malaria cases in a 12-month period: a fall from 185,420 cases to 38,920 cases. This progress demonstrates that well targeted assistance can have an immediate and sustainable impact on the lives of vulnerable people. Therefore, the strategy of organisations participating in the 2004 Consolidated Inter-Agency Appeal for DPRK, aims to preserve lives and promote the well being of vulnerable populations, including children and women. The humanitarian response
Recommended publications
  • Pdf | 431.24 Kb
    DEMOCRATIC PEOPEL'S REPUBLIC OF KOREA NUTRITION Onsong Kyongwon ± Combat Undernutrition especially for Mother and Children North Kyonghung Hamgyong Hoiryong City Musan Chongjin City Kilometers Taehongdan 050 100 200 Puryong Samjiyon Yonsa Junggang Ryanggang Kyongsong Pochon Paekam Jasong Orang Kimhyongjik Hyesan City Unhung Hwaphyong Kimjongsuk Myonggan Manpo City Samsu Kapsan Janggang Kilju Myongchon Sijung Kanggye City Chagang Rangrim Pungso Hwadae Chosan Wiwon Songgang Pujon Hochon Kimchaek City Kimhyonggwon North Usi Kopung Jonchon South Hamgyong Phyongan Pyokdong Ryongrim Tanchon City Changsong Jangjin Toksong Sakju Songwon Riwon Sinhung Uiju Tongsin Taegwan Tongchang Pukchong Huichon City Sinuiju City Hongwon Sinpho City Chonma Unsan Yonggwang Phihyon Taehung Ryongchon Hyangsan Kusong City Hamhung City Sindo Nyongwon Yomju Tongrim Thaechon Kujang Hamju Sonchon Rakwon Cholsan Nyongbyon Pakchon Tokchon City Kwaksan Jongju City Unjon Jongphyong Kaechon City Yodok Maengsan Anju City Pukchang Mundok Kumya Responsible Agencies Sunchon City Kowon Sukchon Sinyang Sudong WFP Pyongsong City South Chonnae Pyongwon Songchon PhyonganYangdok Munchon City Jungsan UNICEF Wonsan City Taedong Pyongyang City Kangdong Hoichang Anbyon Kangso Sinpyong Popdong UNFPA PyongyangKangnam Thongchon Onchon Junghwa YonsanNorth Kosan Taean Sangwon Areas with No Access Nampo City Hwangju HwanghaeKoksan Hoiyang Suan Pangyo Sepho Free Trade Zone Unchon Yontan Kumgang Kosong Unryul Sariwon City Singye Changdo South Anak Pongsan Sohung Ichon Kangwon Phyonggang Kwail Kimhwa Jaeryong HwanghaeSonghwa Samchon Unpha Phyongsan Sinchon Cholwon Jangyon Rinsan Tosan Ryongyon Sinwon Kumchon Taetan Pongchon Pyoksong Jangphung Haeju City Kaesong City Chongdan Ongjin Paechon Yonan Kaepung Kangryong Map Compiled By WFP VAM Unit Feb 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Facilities of Asia and the Pacific," 2007 (Open-File Report 2010-1254)
    Table1.—Attribute data for the map "Mineral Facilities of Asia and the Pacific," 2007 (Open-File Report 2010-1254). [The United States Geological Survey (USGS) surveys international mineral industries to generate statistics on the global production, distribution, and resources of industrial minerals. This directory highlights the economically significant mineral facilities of Asia and the Pacific. Distribution of these facilities is shown on the accompanying map. Each record represents one commodity and one facility type for a single location. Facility types include mines, oil and gas fields, and processing plants such as refineries, smelters, and mills. Facility identification numbers (“Position”) are ordered alphabetically by country, followed by commodity, and then by capacity (descending). The “Year” field establishes the year for which the data were reported in Minerals Yearbook, Volume III – Area Reports: Mineral Industries of Asia and the Pacific. In the “DMS Latitiude” and “DMS Longitude” fields, coordinates are provided in degree-minute-second (DMS) format; “DD Latitude” and “DD Longitude” provide coordinates in decimal degrees (DD). Data were converted from DMS to DD. Coordinates reflect the most precise data available. Where necessary, coordinates are estimated using the nearest city or other administrative district.“Status” indicates the most recent operating status of the facility. Closed facilities are excluded from this report. In the “Notes” field, combined annual capacity represents the total of more facilities, plus additional
    [Show full text]
  • Democratic People's Republic of Korea INDIVIDUALS
    CONSOLIDATED LIST OF FINANCIAL SANCTIONS TARGETS IN THE UK Last Updated:21/01/2021 Status: Asset Freeze Targets REGIME: Democratic People's Republic of Korea INDIVIDUALS 1. Name 6: AN 1: JONG 2: HYUK 3: n/a 4: n/a 5: n/a. Title: Diplomat DOB: 14/03/1970. a.k.a: AN, Jong, Hyok Nationality: Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) Passport Details: 563410155 Address: Egypt.Position: Diplomat DPRK Embassy Egypt Other Information: (UK Sanctions List Ref):DPR0001 Date designated on UK Sanctions List: 31/12/2020 (Further Identifiying Information):Associations with Green Pine Corporation and DPRK Embassy Egypt (UK Statement of Reasons):Representative of Saeng Pil Trading Corporation, an alias of Green Pine Associated Corporation, and DPRK diplomat in Egypt.Green Pine has been designated by the UN for activities including breach of the UN arms embargo.An Jong Hyuk was authorised to conduct all types of business on behalf of Saeng Pil, including signing and implementing contracts and banking business.The company specialises in the construction of naval vessels and the design, fabrication and installation of electronic communication and marine navigation equipment. (Gender):Male Listed on: 22/01/2018 Last Updated: 31/12/2020 Group ID: 13590. 2. Name 6: BONG 1: PAEK 2: SE 3: n/a 4: n/a 5: n/a. DOB: 21/03/1938. Nationality: Democratic People's Republic of Korea Position: Former Chairman of the Second Economic Committee,Former member of the National Defense Commission,Former Vice Director of Munitions Industry Department (MID) Other Information: (UK Sanctions List Ref):DPR0251 (UN Ref): KPi.048 (Further Identifiying Information):Paek Se Bong is a former Chairman of the Second Economic Committee, a former member of the National Defense Commission, and a former Vice Director of Munitions Industry Department (MID) Listed on: 05/06/2017 Last Updated: 31/12/2020 Group ID: 13478.
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Korean Bulletin
    Approved For ReleaaUf1ie5/23 : CIA-RDP91T01172R6442,1,30001-6 swam Security Intonation: Central Intelligence Agency Office of Current Intelligence 0454,2 January 1953 DAILY KOREAN BULLETIN Militarv Operations Army On 31 December and 1 January only minor probes and patrols contacts were reported across the front. A total of 13,636 rounds of artillery and mortar fire was expended during the two-day period.The most noteworthy action was a series of 10 probing attacks on 1 January against elements of the RCK 12th Division east of the Punch Bowl; the enemy was repultad in each engagement,. the longest of which lasted 45 minutes* Navy A total of 202 naval air sorties was flown on 31 December. Aircraft attacked Pungsan, Kilchu and Wonsan on the east coast, and Channampos Upchori, Ongjin and Haeju on the west coast. Surface units on the east coast bombarded Songjin, Tanchon, Chaho and Wonsan, The area between Amgak to Wolsari was fired on by naval vessels on the west coast. On 1 January, only eight sorties were flown because of foul weather; all the planes involved were from the west coast carrier Badoeng Strait attacking Tanchonni and Haeju. Air UN land-based aircraft under Far East Air Flate controlon 31 December flew 661 effective sorties, of which 372were combat. Only three effective medium bomber nissiOEB were flown during the night and these aircraftengaged in close support and reconnaissance. On 1 January, 532 effective land-based air sorties were flown, including 285 Combat.No enemy aircraft were observed or encountered on either day. On the night of 1-2 January, Far East Bomber Command mounted 14 effective sorties.
    [Show full text]
  • DPRK) So Far This Year
    DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE’S 16 April 2004 REPUBLIC OF KOREA Appeal No. 01.68/2004 Appeal Target: CHF 14, 278, 310 Programme Update No. 01 Period covered: January – March 2004 The Federation’s mission is to improve the lives of vulnerable people by mobilising the power of humanity. It is the world’s largest humanitarian organisation and its millions of volunteers are active in over 180 countries. For more information: www.ifrc.org In Brief Appeal coverage: 36.3 %; See attached Contributions List for details. Outstanding needs: CHF 9,089,504 Related Emergency or Annual Appeals: 01.67/2003 Programme Summary: No major natural disasters have affected the People’s Democratic Republic of Korea (DPRK) so far this year. Food security is a major concern, especially in areas remote from the capital. The Red Cross Society of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK RC) has been granted permission from the government to expand the Federation supported health and care programme to another province, increasing the number of potential beneficiaries covered by the essential medicines programme to 8.8 million from July 2004. Due to delayed funding, the first quarter of 2004 has been used to finalise most of the programme activities from the 2003 appeal. Bilateral support from the Republic of Korea, the Netherlands and the Norwegian Red Cross Societies is supplementing Federation support. Partner national societies renewed their commitment to continue supporting DPRK RC. DPRK RC is regarded as an important organisation in DPRK by the government, donor country embassies, UN agencies and NGOs. Operational developments Harvests last year in DPRK were above average, however, the UN Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) and the World Food Programme (WFP) state that, despite the good harvests, the situation remains “especially precarious” for young children, pregnant and nursing women and many elderly people.
    [Show full text]
  • Korea-Today-2021-0306.Pdf
    Monthly Journal (777) C O N T E N T S 2 Second Plenary Meeting of Eighth Central Committee of WPK Held 12 Kim Jong Un Sees Lunar New Year’s Day Performance with Party Central Leadership Body Members 14 Appeal to All Working People Across the Country 15 By Dint of Scientifi c Self-reliance 16 Harnessing of Renewable Energy Propelled 17 Electric Power Management Gets Upgraded 18 By Tapping Local Materials 19 Secret of Increasing Production 20 Ideals for New Victory 21 Guidance for the People’s Well-being Monthly journal Korea Today is available on the Internet site www.korean-books.com.kp in English, Russian and Chinese. 22 Education Highlighted in DPRK 23 Immortal Juche Idea (10) Self-reliance in National Defence 24 Pride of Medical Scientist 24 Authority on Burns Treatment 26 With Sincerity and Devotion 28 True story Front Cover: On March Life and Promise 8 International Women’s Day 30 Vinalon Inventor and His Descendants Photo by courtesy 32 E-commerce Gets Expansive of the KCNA 33 Efforts for Correct and Prompt Weather Forecast 34 How Mun Has Overcome Disability 35 Liquefi ed Rare Earth Draws Attention 36 Small Institute in Woods 37 People Who Strive to Increase Forest Land 38 Songchon County Changes 40 Pacesetter of Costume Culture 41 For Conservation of Water Resources 42 Kimchi, Distinctive Dish of Korea (1) Kimchi and Folklore of Korea 44 Mt Chilbo ( 2 ) Back Cover: Rhododen- 46 National Intangible Cultural Heritage (51) dron blossoms in the snow Ssolmaethagi Photo by Song Tae Hyok 47 Ho Jun and Tonguibogam 48 History Denounces 13502 Edited by An Su Yong Address: Sochon-dong, Sosong District, Pyongyang, DPRK E-mail: fl [email protected] © The Foreign Language Magazines 2021 1 ► amine the plans for this year in detail and fi x and work for implementing the decisions made at the issue them as the decisions of the Party Central Party congress starts and what kind of change is Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Setting Devotion to People at Core of WPK's Activities
    Democratic People’s Republic of Korea No. 32 (3 172) weekly http://www.pyongyangtimes.com.kp e-mail:[email protected] Sat, August 7, Juche 110 (2021) LEAD PATRIOT Setting devotion to people at Nation blessed with core of WPK’s activities growing number of patriots Meritorious persons of Kim Jong Il made sure that It is the supreme principle of always went deeper among the day in August 2018, saying he socialist patriotism are found the people across the country activities of the Workers’ Party people to become their firm would only feel at ease when everywhere in the DPRK which learned after the spiritual world of Korea to steadily improve the spiritual pillar and share weal he rode it first, and examined is seething with enthusiasm of Hero Jong Song Ok and, at people’s material and cultural and woe near them and devoted handles and other fittings one for implementing the first-year the same time, put forward standards of living. everything for their wellbeing by one. tasks of the new five-year plan. frontrunners in various fields as The Third Plenary Meeting of whenever they were in trouble. When new streets and leisure They are unassumingly leaving heroes of the times. the Eighth Central Committee One day in September facilities such as Changjon, indelible marks of their life The Korean people cultivated of the WPK held last June 2020 when the General Mirae Scientists and Ryomyong in the building of a thriving their minds in the days of severe discussed as its major agenda Secretary inspected Kangbuk- streets and the Munsu Water country with their intense trials as they learned the noble items the issues of protecting ri of Kumchon County, North Park were under construction, loyalty, clean conscience and spirit of the chairwoman of the the life and safety of the people, Hwanghae Province, which was he visited the construction sites untiring devotion and passion.
    [Show full text]
  • North Korea Development Report 2002/03
    Development Report 2002/03 Report Development Korea North North Korea Development Report 2002/03 Edited by Choong Yong Ahn Choong Yong Ahn Edited by North Korea Development Report 2002/03 Edited by Choong Yong Ahn Choong Yong Ahn is the president of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. He received his Ph.D. from Ohio State University. He was a professor in the Department of Economics at Chung-Ang University in Seoul. Dr. Ahn is current- ly serving as the Chair of the APEC Economic Committee and as a member of the Presidential Economic Advisory Council in Korea. He has written extensively on issues related to East Asian development and economic cooperation in the Asia-Pacific region. His recent publications include “A Search for Robust East K Asian Development Models After the Financial Crisis: Mutual Y Learning form East Asian Experiences” (Journal of Asian M Economics, 2001) and “Financial and Cooperate Sector C Restructuring in South Korea: Accomplishments and Unfinished Agenda” (Japanese Economic Review, 2001). He was bestowed with the Okita Research Award from the National Institute for Research Advancement in Japan on the book, Gendai Higashi Asia Geizairon (Modern East Asia Economy), published by Iwanami Shoten in 2000. 300-4 Yomgok-dong, Seocho-gu, Seoul 137-747 Korea Tel. (822) 3460-1114 Fax. (822) 3460-1144 URL: http://www.kiep.go.kr Price USD 20 The Korea Institute for International Economic Policy (KIEP) was founded in 1990 as a government-funded economic research institute. It is the world’s leading institute on the international economy and its relationship with Korea.
    [Show full text]
  • North Korean Magnesite
    NORTH KOREAN MAGNESITE DAVID COPLET Amsterdam MANAGING DIRECTOR May 10-12, 2009 51% 49% LOCATION OF MAGNESITE DEPOSITS AND OPERATIONS IN NORTH KOREA MAGNESITE ENERGY SUNGRI CCM PLANT – NORTH KOREA BUSINESS AGREEMENT BETWEEN QUINTERMINA AND SUNGRI FOR EXPORT OF CCM KMCIG – KOREA MAGNESIA CLINKER INDUSTRIAL GROUP BUSINESS AGREEMENT BETWEEN QUINTERMINA AND KMCIG FOR EXPORT OF FM, DBM AND CCM DEVELOPMENT PLANS IN NORTH KOREA • PRODUCTION OF CCM IN JOINT VENTURE WITH SUNGRI TRADING COMPANY • EXPORT OF FM, DBM AND CCM OF KMCIG (KOREA MAGNESITE CLINKER INDUSTRY GROUP) • FILLING VOID CREATED BY CHINA RESTRICTING MAGNESIA EXPORTS BY LICENCE SYSTEM MAGNESITE MINE MAGNESIA PLANT COAL MINE NAJIN YANG GANG-DO CHONGJIN COAL SUNGRI SUNGRI EXPORTS BAEK BAE MINE BAKONG DAEHUNG/ KMCIG NORTH RYONG YANG MINES KOREA DAEHUNG KIMCHAEK PORT KMCIG KMCIG EXPORTS HAMYONG- TANCHON 100km CHAGANG-DO NAMDO LOCATION OF MAGNESITE MINES AND PLANTS OF KMCIG AND SUNGRI IN NORTH KOREA OPERATIONS SUNGRI BAEK BAE MINE FACTORY DAEHUNG KMCIG 41º DAEHUNG FACTORY YANGGANG-DO RYONG YANG KIMCHAEK PORT RAIL HAMGYONG KMCIG -NAMDO TANCHON TANCHON FACTORY 40º MAGNESITE DEPOSIT MAGNESIA FACTORY HUNGNAM RAILWAY 127º 128º 129º 130º LOCATION OF MINES AND MAGNESITE PLANTS SUNGRI MAGNESITE STOCKPILE AT SUNGRI FROM WHITE ROCK MINE MAGNESITE FEED FOR KILNS KILNS SUNGRI PLANT AND CCM PRODUCTION MILLING BIG BAG STORAGE TYPICAL 200# QUALITY OF CCM FROM SUNGRI Wt.% MgO 91.5 CaO 1.6 SiO2 1.1 Fe2O3 0.6 Al2O3 0.1 LOI 4.6 <200 MESH POWDER KMCIG Quintermina AG to assist KMCIG Quintermina AG is now a business partner with KMCIG and is investing to grow and improve production.
    [Show full text]
  • S/2020/151 Security Council
    United Nations S/2020/151 Security Council Distr.: General 2 March 2020 Original: English Note by the President of the Security Council In paragraph 2 of resolution 2464 (2019), the Security Council requested the Panel of Experts established pursuant to resolution 1874 (2009) to provide a final report to the Council with its findings and recommendations. Accordingly, the President hereby circulates the report received from the Panel of Experts (see annex). 20-02046 (E) 200420 *2 00 2 04 6* S/2020/151 Annex Letter dated 26 February 2020 from the Panel of Experts established pursuant to resolution 1874 (2009) addressed to the President of the Security Council The Panel of Experts established pursuant to Security Council resolution 1874 (2009) has the honour to transmit herewith, in accordance with paragraph 2 of resolution 2464 (2019), the final report on its work. The report was provided to the Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolution 1718 (2006) on 7 February 2020 and was considered by the Committee on 19 February 2020. The Panel would appreciate it if the present letter and the report were brought to the attention of the members of the Security Council and issued as a document of the Council. Panel of Experts established pursuant to Security Council resolution 1874 (2009) 2/266 20-02046 S/2020/151 Enclosure Letter dated 7 February 2020 from the Panel of Experts established pursuant to resolution 1874 (2009) addressed to the Chair of the Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolution 1718 (2006) The Panel of Experts established pursuant to Security Council resolution 1874 (2009) has the honour to transmit herewith, in accordance with paragraph 2 of resolution 2464 (2019), the final report on its work.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mineral Industry of North Korea in 2004
    THE MINERAL INDUSTRY OF NORTH KOREA By John C. Wu The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (North Korea), the country’s outdated thermal-power-generating facilities and which occupies the northern half of the Korean Peninsula, is insufficient coal supply. located east of the Korean Bay, west of the Sea of Japan (the The Government has been implementing its economic reform East Sea), south of China, and north of the Republic of Korea. since July 2002. The reform measures included introducing The country’s total area is about 120,540 square kilometers, market economy elements; phasing out the Government or about the size of Pennsylvania. In 2004, its population was food rationing system; establishing general markets in major about 22.7 million. Its economy remained tightly controlled cities; designating Gaesong, Mount Geumgang, and Shinuiju and centrally planned by the North Korean Government. The as special economic zones; and sending professional groups country’s gross domestic product (GDP) and the GDP per abroad to learn about market economies. The Government has capita based on purchasing power parity were estimated to be simultaneously implemented such supplementary measures as $30.9 billion and $1,400, respectively, in 2004 (U.S. Central establishing state-owned food stores and wholesale department Intelligence Agency, 2005§1). stores to stabilize the prices of rice and other daily necessities The country’s identified mineral resources are coal, copper, (Ministry of Unification of the Republic of Korea, 2004c§). fluorspar, gold, graphite, iron ore, lead, limestone, magnesite North Korea’s environmental protection law was first passed (magnesium carbonate), pyrite, salt, silver, tungsten, and zinc.
    [Show full text]
  • Floods 1,955,140
    RESIDENT/HUMANITARIAN COORDINATOR REPORT 2012 ON THE USE OF CERF FUNDS DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF KOREA RESIDENT/HUMANITARIAN COORDINATOR Ms. Desiree Jongsma (acting) PART 1: COUNTRY OVERVIEW I. SUMMARY OF FUNDING 20121 TABLE 1: COUNTRY SUMMARY OF ALLOCATIONS (US$) CERF 12,920,667 COMMON HUMANITARIAN FUND/ EMERGENCY RESPONSE 0 Breakdown of total response FUND (if applicable) funding received by source OTHER (Bilateral/Multilateral) 104,556,133 TOTAL 117,476,800 Underfunded Emergencies First Round 10,965,527 Breakdown of CERF funds received by window and Second Round 0 emergency Rapid Response Floods 1,955,140 II. REPORTING PROCESS AND CONSULTATION SUMMARY a. Please confirm that the RC/HC Report was discussed in the Humanitarian and/or UN Country Team and by cluster/sector coordinators as outlined in the guidelines. YES NO b. Was the final version of the RC/HC Report shared for review with in-country stakeholders as recommended in the guidelines (i.e. the CERF recipient agencies, cluster/sector coordinators and members and relevant government counterparts)? YES NO The final version was shared for review with recipient agencies prior to submission; however other stakeholders, including Government counterparts, will receive a copy after submission. 1 Does not include late 2011 allocation. 2 PART 2: CERF EMERGENCY RESPONSE – NUTRITION CRISIS (RAPID RESPONSE 2011) I. HUMANITARIAN CONTEXT TABLE 1: EMERGENCY ALLOCATION OVERVIEW (US$) Total amount required for the humanitarian response: US$ 9,288,000 Source Amount Breakdown of total response
    [Show full text]