DOCSLIB.ORG

Master Plan for Mineral Extraction Douglas County

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Master Plan for Mineral Extraction Douglas County MASTER PLAN FOR MINERAL EXTRACTION DOUGLAS COUNTY July 9, 1990 Redline-strikethrough of original document ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Jim Sullivan, Chairman Chris Christensen Suzy McDanal PLANNING COMMISSION Neil Hillyard, Chairman Ken Gloss, Vice-Chairman Duane Capps, Secretary Davis Ammons Dora D'Amico David Gill Neil McLaughlin Stanley Mikelson Clyde Tucker MINERAL EXTRACTION PLANNING TASK FORCE Lou Pakiser, Chairman Davis Ammons Jeanette Bare Duane Capps Dora D'Amico Harvey DuChene Kelli Fallbach David Gill Ken Gloss Sally Hardy Neil Hillyard Tony Johnson John Lowell Mike Maxwell JoeAnn Mickelsen Norma Stone Clyde Tucker Ray Waterman Mike Refer, Conferee Jane Woodward, Conferee PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Ed Tepe, Director A special thanks to all of the individual citizens, homeowner associations, and referral agencies too numerous to list, whose time, energy, and resourcefulness contributed to the creation of this document. Amendment to Mineral Extraction Plan - DRAFT Project No. DR2016-001 Redline version, Jan 10, 2018, Page 2 of 87 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER 2 GEOLOGY 5 CHAPTER 3 SUPPLY AND DEMAND 21 CHAPTER 4 LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS 29 CHAPTER 5 LAND USE 33 CHAPTER 6 TRANSPORTATION 41 CHAPTER 7 WILDLIFE 47 CHAPTER 8 HISTORIC, ARCHAEOLOGIC, & PALEONTOLOGIC RESOURCES 49 CHAPTER 9 AIR QUALITY 51 CHAPTER 10 WATER QUALITY 57 CHAPTER 11 NOISE 63 CHAPTER 12 BLASTING 67 CHAPTER 13 OPEN SPACE, PARKS, AND RECREATION 71 CHAPTER 14 VISUAL IMPACT 75 CHAPTER 15 RECLAMATION 79 CHAPTER 16 IMPLEMENTATION 83 Amendment to Mineral Extraction Plan - DRAFT Project No. DR2016-001 Redline version, Jan 10, 2018, Page 3 of 87 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... x BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................... x PURPOSE ................................................................................................................................... x IMPLEMENTATION ..................................................................................................................... x GEOLOGY................................................................................................................................... x LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS ........................................................................................................ x GOAL AND POLICY .................................................................................................................... x APPENDIX A – GLOSSARY ........................................................................................................ x APPENDIX B – STATE STATUTE............................................................................................... x MINERAL RESOURCES MAP................................................................................................... xx Amendment to Mineral Extraction Plan - DRAFT Project No. DR2016-001 Redline version, Jan 10, 2018, Page 4 of 87 2 MAP AND GRAPHS PAGE BEDROCK AQUIFERS 17 DENVER BASIN GEOLOGIC SECTIONS 18 POTENTIAL RESOURCES 19 DEMAND SCENARIO 1 25 DEMAND SCENARIO 2 26 Amendment to Mineral Extraction Plan - DRAFT Project No. DR2016-001 Redline version, Jan 10, 2018, Page 5 of 87 INTRODUCTION On September 12, 1989, the Douglas County Board of Commissioners declared a moratorium on the issuance of mineral extraction permits. In declaring the moratorium, the Board called for a comprehensive, county-wide, mineral extraction plan to be developed and adopted before the moratorium expires on September 12, 1990. The mineral extraction plan has been prepared in accordance with the standards set forth in the Preservation of Mineral Deposits Act (see Legal Considerations chapter), required of all counties upon the attainment of a population of 65,000. Although Douglas County has not yet reached a population of 65,000, it is expected to do so in 1992. At that time, Douglas County will already have a comprehensive mineral extraction plan in place. The Mineral Extraction Planning Task Force, the Planning Commission, and the Board of County Commissioners have produced a plan that sets out the County's mineral­ extraction policies. The plan should be used by applicants, extractors, and citizens to understand the issues that will be raised in the land use application process. It also is intended as a starting point for changes to the special use application and review process. Included in the plan are recommendations for incorporating new processes, criteria, and standards in Douglas County regulations. The process began with the appointment of the Mineral Extraction Planning Task Force. The task force includes representatives of the mineral extraction industry who are residents of Douglas County, the Planning Commission, citizens from each County Commissioner's district, the Governor's Task Force on Mountain Scars, and The Planning Department. The Board then contracted with CDR Associates to act as facilitators and to work with the appointed chairman and the task force to manage the task force meetings through a consensus process. On December 13, 1989, a representative of the Town of Castle Rock was appointed as a task force member. The Town of Parker was also invited to appoint a representative. After introductory meetings, the Board of Commissioners appointed two conferees to act as advisors to the task force and to help create an open and thorough planning process. One conferee represents the Colorado Environmental Coalition, and one represents the Colorado Rock Products Association. The task force set out to create a document that would address the following tasks: Clearly assert the County's land use jurisdiction over mineral extraction operations Enumerate the policies that should govern the approval of mineral extraction Discuss the full range of impacts created by extractive uses Contain criteria to be applied to applications for new or expanded operations Form the basis for amendments to the Douglas County Zoning and Subdivision Resolutions Guide decision-makers in properly reviewing extraction applications BALANCE The plan attempts to balance the County's real need for clay and rock products against the potential and real negative impacts of extraction. The quality of life in Douglas County was at the center of the deliberations. A quality living environment is clearly dependent on the mineral resources this plan seeks to regulate. Mineral extraction is necessary in the development of Amendment to Mineral Extraction Plan - DRAFT Project No. DR2016-001 Redline version, Jan 10, 2018, Page 6 of 87 homes, roads, and office buildings and, therefore, is part of the County's economic viability. Reclaimed mineral extraction sites, moreover, provide opportunities for wildlife habitat, trail corridors, and other active and passive recreational uses. The quality living environment enjoyed by County residents also needs to be protected. We must balance the benefits of extraction against the potential loss of those things that make Douglas County's environment so attractive, including, but not limited to, scenic values and wildlife habitat. Mineral extraction has the potential of disrupting urban and rural lifestyles. The County's residential areas are blessed with outstanding panoramic views of mesas and foothills, and they are nestled in valleys supporting widely varied vegetation, rock formations, and wildlife. Many residents and business owners chose Douglas County for its pastoral quality, unique geographic diversity, and clean environment. The County, therefore, has a fundamental responsibility to address mineral extraction needs while also protecting these highly valued resources without which Douglas County's economy will not flourish. THE PLAN AS A RESOURCE Throughout the deliberation process the mineral extraction plan was referred to as a resource for the extraction industry, for the policy-makers, and for the citizens of the County. As a product of that philosophy, the document contains descriptions of the County's geologic framework, which defines the character, occurrence, and extent of its mineral resources. The document also specifically addresses the supply and demand for rock products. It also discusses the legal framework surrounding the mineral extraction plan and local land use review. These three chapters are designed to provide background information. The task force hopes to pass along to the user of the plan some of what was learned as the plan was developed. The prose that accompanies each policy section is likewise written with an educational objective to shed light on the reasons for adopting the policies which follow. The structure and outline of the document is meant to reflect the structure of the Douglas County Master Plan. At the completion of the hearing process, the plan will be incorporated into the Master Plan and the Master Plan will be amended to remove duplications or conflicts. In addition to meeting the statutory requirements for a mineral­ extraction plan, and the charge of the Board of County Commissioners, the task force sought to fulfill the commitment made by the Planning Commission in the 1986 Master Plan and the 1989 Franktown Sub Area Plan to develop a county-wide, mineral extraction plan. IMPLEMENTATION Implementation is emphasized throughout the plan. This plan is not merely a statement of recommended policies;
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CRETACEOUS-TERTIARY BOUNDARY Ijst the ROCKY MOUNTAIN REGION1
    BULLETIN OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA V o l..¿5, pp. 325-340 September 15, 1914 PROCEEDINGS OF THE PALEONTOLOGICAL SOCIETY CRETACEOUS-TERTIARY BOUNDARY IjST THE ROCKY MOUNTAIN REGION1 BY P. H . KNOWLTON (Presented before the Paleontological Society December 31, 1913) CONTENTS Page Introduction........................................................................................................... 325 Stratigraphic evidence........................................................................................ 325 Paleobotanical evidence...................................................................................... 331 Diastrophic evidence........................................................................................... 334 The European time scale.................................................................................. 335 Vertebrate evidence............................................................................................ 337 Invertebrate evidence.......................................................................................... 339 Conclusions............................................................................................................ 340 I ntroduction The thesis of this paper is as follows: It is proposed to show that the dinosaur-bearing beds known as “Ceratops beds,” “Lance Creek bieds,” Lance formation, “Hell Creek beds,” “Somber beds,” “Lower Fort Union,”- Laramie of many writers, “Upper Laramie,” Arapahoe, Denver, Dawson, and their equivalents, are above a major
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis and Correlation of Growth
    ANALYSIS AND CORRELATION OF GROWTH STRATA OF THE CRETACEOUS TO PALEOCENE LOWER DAWSON FORMATION: INSIGHT INTO THE TECTONO-STRATIGRAPHIC EVOLUTION OF THE COLORADO FRONT RANGE by Korey Tae Harvey A thesis submitted to the Faculty and Board of Trustees of the Colorado School of Mines in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science (Geology). Golden, Colorado Date __________________________ Signed: ________________________ Korey Harvey Signed: ________________________ Dr. Jennifer Aschoff Thesis Advisor Golden, Colorado Date ___________________________ Signed: _________________________ Dr. Paul Santi Professor and Head Department of Geology and Geological Engineering ii ABSTRACT Despite numerous studies of Laramide-style (i.e., basement-cored) structures, their 4-dimensional structural evolution and relationship to adjacent sedimentary basins are not well understood. Analysis and correlation of growth strata along the eastern Colorado Front Range (CFR) help decipher the along-strike linkage of thrust structures and their affect on sediment dispersal. Growth strata, and the syntectonic unconformities within them, record the relative roles of uplift and deposition through time; when mapped along-strike, they provide insight into the location and geometry of structures through time. This paper presents an integrated structural- stratigraphic analysis and correlation of three growth-strata assemblages within the fluvial and fluvial megafan deposits of the lowermost Cretaceous to Paleocene Dawson Formation on the eastern CFR between Colorado Springs, CO and Sedalia, CO. Structural attitudes from 12 stratigraphic profiles at the three locales record dip discordances that highlight syntectonic unconformities within the growth strata packages. Eight traditional-type syntectonic unconformities were correlated along-strike of the eastern CFR distinguish six phases of uplift in the central portion of the CFR.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Studies of the Platte River, South-Central Nebraska and Adjacent Areas—Geologic Maps, Subsurface Study, and Geologic History
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Publications of the US Geological Survey US Geological Survey 2005 Geologic Studies of the Platte River, South-Central Nebraska and Adjacent Areas—Geologic Maps, Subsurface Study, and Geologic History Steven M. Condon Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgspubs Part of the Earth Sciences Commons Condon, Steven M., "Geologic Studies of the Platte River, South-Central Nebraska and Adjacent Areas—Geologic Maps, Subsurface Study, and Geologic History" (2005). Publications of the US Geological Survey. 22. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgspubs/22 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the US Geological Survey at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Publications of the US Geological Survey by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Geologic Studies of the Platte River, South- Central Nebraska and Adjacent Areas—Geologic Maps, Subsurface Study, and Geologic History Professional Paper 1706 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Geologic Studies of the Platte River, South-Central Nebraska and Adjacent Areas—Geologic Maps, Subsurface Study, and Geologic History By Steven M. Condon Professional Paper 1706 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Charles G. Groat, Director Version 1.0, 2005 This publication and any updates to it are available online at: http://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/pp1706/ Manuscript approved for publication, March 3, 2005 Text edited by James W. Hendley II Layout and design by Stephen L.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Characterization 111 Date 7/31/91 List of Appendices
    Characterization GEOLOGIC Prepared by ? TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ........................................... 1 1.2 Scope of Characterization .............................. 1 1.2.1 Literature Search .... ........................... 1 1.2.2 Core Processing and Description ..................... 2 1.2.3 Reprocessing of Seismic Data ........................ 2 1.2.4 Grain Size Analysis .............................. 2 1.2.5 Geologic Report ................................ 3 1.3 Location and General Setting ...., ........................ 3 1.4 Previous Studies ...................................... 5 2.0 STRATIGRAPHY ....................................... 7 Precambrian ......................................... 2.1 7 2.2 Paleozoic And Mesozoic Sedimentary Section ................ 2.2.1 Fountain Formation (PennsylvanianPermian) ............ 7 2.2.2 Lyons Sandstone Formation (Permian) ................ 7 2.2.3 Lykins Formation (PermianrTriassic) ................. 10 2.2.4 Ralston Creek Formation (Jiurassic) .................. 10 2.2.5 Momson Formation (Jurassic) ...................... 10 2.2.6 Dakota Group (Lower Cretaceous) ................... 10 2.2.7 Benton Shale Formation (Lower/Upper Cretaceous) ....... 11 2.2.8 Niobrara Formation (Upper Cretaceous) ............... 11 2.2.9 Pierre Shale Formation (Upper Cretaceous) ............. 11 2.2.10 Fox Hills Sandstone Formation (Upper Cretaceous) ....... 12 2.2.1 1 Laramie Formation (Upper Cretaceous) ............... 12 2.2.12
    [Show full text]
  • Improvement of the Geotechnical Axial Design Methodology for Colorado’S Drilled Shafts Socketed in Weak Rocks
    Report No. CDOT-DTD-R-2003-6 Final Report IMPROVEMENT OF THE GEOTECHNICAL AXIAL DESIGN METHODOLOGY FOR COLORADO’S DRILLED SHAFTS SOCKETED IN WEAK ROCKS Naser Abu-Hejleh Michael W. O'Neill Dennis Hanneman William J. Atwooll July 2003 COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BRANCH The contents of this report reflect the views of the author(s), who is(are) responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views of the Colorado Department of Transportation or the Federal Highway Administration. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. The preliminary design recommendations should be considered for only conditions very close to those encountered at the load test sites and per the qualifications described in Chapter 6. Use of the information contained in the report is at the sole discretion of the designer. i Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. CDOT-DTD-R-2003-6 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date July 2003 IMPROVEMENT OF THE GEOTECHNICAL AXIAL DESIGN METHODOLOGY FOR COLORADO’S DRILLED SHAFTS SOCKETED 6. Performing Organization Code IN WEAK ROCKS 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. CDOT-DTD-R-2003-6 Naser Abu-Hejleh, Michael W. O'Neill, Dennis Hanneman, William J. Atwooll 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Colorado Department of Transportation 11. Contract or Grant No. 4201 E. Arkansas Ave Performed internally by CDOT-Research Office Denver, Colorado 80222 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13.
    [Show full text]
  • Diachronous Development of Great Unconformities Before Neoproterozoic Snowball Earth
    Diachronous development of Great Unconformities before Neoproterozoic Snowball Earth Rebecca M. Flowersa,1, Francis A. Macdonaldb, Christine S. Siddowayc, and Rachel Havraneka aDepartment of Geological Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309; bEarth Science Department, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106; and cDepartment of Geology, The Colorado College, Colorado Springs, CO 80903 Edited by Paul F. Hoffman, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada, and approved March 6, 2020 (received for review July 30, 2019) The Great Unconformity marks a major gap in the continental precisely because the Great Unconformities mark a large gap in geological record, separating Precambrian basement from Phan- the rock record, the erosion history leading to their formation erozoic sedimentary rocks. However, the timing, magnitude, cannot be investigated directly by study of preserved units. spatial heterogeneity, and causes of the erosional event(s) and/ Past work leads to at least four general models for the timing or depositional hiatus that lead to its development are unknown. and magnitude of pre-Great Unconformity continental erosion, We present field relationships from the 1.07-Ga Pikes Peak batho- which are depicted in Fig. 1. Some have proposed major erosion lith in Colorado that constrain the position of Cryogenian and of the continents associated with assembly of the supercontinent Cambrian paleosurfaces below the Great Unconformity. Tavakaiv Rodinia and mantle upwelling below it prior to 850 Ma (Hy- sandstone injectites with an age of ≥676 ± 26 Ma cut Pikes Peak pothesis 1) or with the early diachronous breakup of Rodinia granite. Injection of quartzose sediment in bulbous bodies indi- between 850 and 717 Ma (Hypothesis 2) (10–17).
    [Show full text]
  • Italic Page Numbers Indicate Major References]
    Index [Italic page numbers indicate major references] Abbott Formation, 411 379 Bear River Formation, 163 Abo Formation, 281, 282, 286, 302 seismicity, 22 Bear Springs Formation, 315 Absaroka Mountains, 111 Appalachian Orogen, 5, 9, 13, 28 Bearpaw cyclothem, 80 Absaroka sequence, 37, 44, 50, 186, Appalachian Plateau, 9, 427 Bearpaw Mountains, 111 191,233,251, 275, 377, 378, Appalachian Province, 28 Beartooth Mountains, 201, 203 383, 409 Appalachian Ridge, 427 Beartooth shelf, 92, 94 Absaroka thrust fault, 158, 159 Appalachian Shelf, 32 Beartooth uplift, 92, 110, 114 Acadian orogen, 403, 452 Appalachian Trough, 460 Beaver Creek thrust fault, 157 Adaville Formation, 164 Appalachian Valley, 427 Beaver Island, 366 Adirondack Mountains, 6, 433 Araby Formation, 435 Beaverhead Group, 101, 104 Admire Group, 325 Arapahoe Formation, 189 Bedford Shale, 376 Agate Creek fault, 123, 182 Arapien Shale, 71, 73, 74 Beekmantown Group, 440, 445 Alabama, 36, 427,471 Arbuckle anticline, 327, 329, 331 Belden Shale, 57, 123, 127 Alacran Mountain Formation, 283 Arbuckle Group, 186, 269 Bell Canyon Formation, 287 Alamosa Formation, 169, 170 Arbuckle Mountains, 309, 310, 312, Bell Creek oil field, Montana, 81 Alaska Bench Limestone, 93 328 Bell Ranch Formation, 72, 73 Alberta shelf, 92, 94 Arbuckle Uplift, 11, 37, 318, 324 Bell Shale, 375 Albion-Scioio oil field, Michigan, Archean rocks, 5, 49, 225 Belle Fourche River, 207 373 Archeolithoporella, 283 Belt Island complex, 97, 98 Albuquerque Basin, 111, 165, 167, Ardmore Basin, 11, 37, 307, 308, Belt Supergroup, 28, 53 168, 169 309, 317, 318, 326, 347 Bend Arch, 262, 275, 277, 290, 346, Algonquin Arch, 361 Arikaree Formation, 165, 190 347 Alibates Bed, 326 Arizona, 19, 43, 44, S3, 67.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Interior Seaway
    () . Paleogeo.graphy of the Late Cretaceous of the Western Interior otMfddle North America+­ j?'oal .Blstribution anct,Sedimen~cumulation By Laura N. Robinson Roberts and Mark A. Kirschbaum U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1561 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1995 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 Any use of trade, product, or finn names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Roberts, Laura N. Robinson. Paleogeography of the Late Cretaceous of the western interior of middle North America : coal distribution and sediment accumulation I by Laura N. Robinson Roberts and Mark A. Kirschbaum. p. em.- (U.S. Geological Survey professional paper ; 1561) Includes bibliographical references. Supt. of Docs. no.: I 19.16: 1561 1. Paleogeography-Cretaceous. 2. Paleogeography-West (U.S.). 3. Coal­ Geology-West (U.S.). I. Kirschbaum, Mark A. II. Title. III. Series. QE50 1.4.P3R63 1995 553.2'1'0978-dc20 94-39032 CIP CONTENTS Abstract........................................................................................................................... 1" Introduction ................................................................................................................... Western Interior Seaway ... .. ... ... ... .. .. ..
    [Show full text]
  • Oil and Gas Exploration and Development Along the Front Range in the Denver Basin of Colorado, Nebraska, and Wyoming by Debra K
    Chapter 2 Oil and Gas Exploration and Development along the Front Range in the Denver Basin of Colorado, Nebraska, and Wyoming By Debra K. Higley and Dave O. Cox Chapter 2 of Petroleum Systems and Assessment of Undiscovered Oil and Gas in the Denver Basin Province, Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, South Dakota, and Wyoming—USGS Province 39 Compiled by Debra K. Higley U.S. Geological Survey Digital Data Series DDS–69–P U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2007 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1–888–ASK–USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone:1–888–ASK–USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Higley, D.K., Cox, D.O., 2007, Oil and gas exploration and development along the front range in the Denver Basin of Colorado, Nebraska, and Wyoming, in Higley, D.K., compiler, Petroleum systems and assessment of undiscovered oil and gas in the Denver Basin Province, Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, South Dakota, and Wyoming—USGS Province 39: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • PALYNOLOGY of the UPPERMOST LARAMIE and ARAPAHOE FOI&Lations at ‘TEE ROCKY FLATS PLANT Mar GOLDEN, COLORADO
    ,,- - - -,- FINAL REPORT PALYNOLOGY OF THE UPPERMOST LARAMIE AND ARAPAHOE FOI&lATIONS AT ‘TEE ROCKY FLATS PLANT mAR GOLDEN, COLORADO U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Rocky Flats hant Golden, Colorado ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION PROGRAM 30 APRIL 1993 Text, Table, and Plates mMIN RECORD S W-A-004907 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section -Title Page 1.o STUDY OBJECTIVES 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION 3 3.0 METHODS 4 4.0 RESULTS 5 5.0 CONCLUSIONS 10 6.0 REFERENCES CITED 11 Palynology of the Uppermost Laramie Final Report and Arapahoe Formations at the April 30, 1993 Rocky Flab Plant oc81 OOkh Colorado i LIST OF TABLES Number -Title 1 ROCKY FLATS POLLEN, SPORES, AND DINOFLAGELLATE OCCURRENCES IN WELLS #B217489, #B218589, #00291, #00191, AND #B3 15289 2 ROCKY FLATS POLLEN, SPORES, AND DINOFLAGELLATE OCCURRENCES IN WELLS M2892, #40891, #40591, #40591, #B217689, AND #B217789 3 A COMPOSITE OF ROCKY FLATS POLLEN, SPORES, AND DINOFLAGELLATE OCCURRENCES IN WELLS #B217489 AND #B218589 Palyaology of tbc Uppamost Laramie and Arapabw Fommtiona at the 3 Rocky fiats Plant m?ar Go- Colorado ii PALYNOLOGY PLATES -Title Plate Nos. NON-MARINE FORMS: FERN SPORES 1-14 GYMNOSPERM POLLEN 15 - 20 ANGIOSPERM POLLEN 21 - 38 MARINE FORMS: DINOFLAGELLATES 39 - 44 I Palywlogy of the Uppamost Laramae FiReport andAra&oe Formatiom at tbe Apnl30.1993 Rocky nats Plant near Go- Colorado iii LIST OF APPENDICES Number -Title 1 TWO MEMOS FROM FRED GRIGSBY RE: POTENTIAL SUBSURFACE STRATIGRAPHIC MARKER BEDS 2 LrrHOLOGIC WELL LOGS 3 PLANT MICROFOSSIL COUNT DATA FROM WELL a17489 AND WELL W291 Palynology of the Uppermost Laramie FiiReport andArapaboeFomratiOllsattbe April 30.1993 5 Rocky Flats Plant near Goldea Colorado iv 1.0 STUDY OBJECTIVES The current geologic characterization model for the Rocky Flats Plant (RFP) establishes au environment of deposition that is based upon interpretation of stratigraphic data obtained from numerous boreholes and wells installed throughout the plant Site.
    [Show full text]
  • Laramie Correlation Map of the Denver
    11. Geol. Soc. Am., vol. 67 Reichert R.5I Legend Castle Rock conglomerate l-\ Castle Rock volcanics ~" • Oawton arkose (re-defined and extended) Table Mountain basalt flows Denver formation (re-defined and extended) Cretaceous - Poleocene contact—-/ of R.W.Brown(l943,p.67) Sasal member of Denver formation Base mop drawn from 1935 geological map of Colorado Arapahoe formation (re-defined and extended) Note: Compare with Plate 2 Correlolion by Stanley 0. Reichert 1955 .oramle formation as originally defined) -LARAMIE CORRELATION MAP OF THE DENVER BASIN, COLORADO POST Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/67/1/107/3441540/i0016-7606-67-1-107.pdf by guest on 02 October 2021 BULLETIN OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA VOL. 67. PP. 107-112, 2 PLS. JANUARY 1956 POST-LARAMIE STRATIGRAPHIC CORRELATIONS IN THE DENVER BASIN, COLORADO BY STANLEY O. REICHERT ABSTRACT In mapping and correlating post-Laramie formations in the Denver Basin, clear-cut mappable formation boundaries have been defined and used. It is proposed that (1) the Laramie-Arapahoe contact remain as originally defined by Emmons, Cross, andEldridge (1896); (2) the Arapahoe-Denver contact be placed at the widespread erosional disconformity at the base of the lowest, thickest, and most prominent basalt-andesite pebble conglom- erate bed in the Denver area, instead of at the first appearance of andesitic debris as originally proposed by Emmons, Cross, and Eldridge (1896). The following changes in nomenclature are proposed: (1) The Arapahoe and Denver formations can be mapped throughout the Denver Basin, and these names should replace the term "lower Dawson" of Dane and Pierce (1936).
    [Show full text]
  • The Contact of the Fox Hills and Lance Formations
    Please do not destroy or throw away this publication. If you have no furtlier use for it, write to the Geological Survey at Washington and ask for a frank t» return it DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Ray Lyman Wilbur, Secretary XI. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY RECEIVED George Otis Smith, Director UtC 1 0 192931 Professional Paper 158—B L. C. DfcCIUS THE CONTACT OF THE FOX HILLS AND LANCE FORMATIONS BY C. E. DOBBIN AND JOHN B. REESIDE, JR. Shorter contributions to general geology, 1929 (Pages 9-25) UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1929 CONTENTS Pagfr Abstract. _______________________________________________________________________________________________ 9 Introduction. _______________________________________________________________________________________________ 9 Questions involved and general conclusions _______________________________________________________ _^_ _____________ 9 Criteria for separation of the Fox Hills and Lance formations__-_____-_-_-_-__---_--____-__________________________ 11 Fox Hills and Lance formations in different regions_-_____-_____--__---__-___--_______-_________________________ 11 Mouth of Cannonball Eiver, N. Dak______-_______-____________-___-_---___--_-_-_-_____-__-_______________ 11 Cannonball River to Fox Ridge, S. Dak____________________________________________________________________ 12 Fox Ridge to Little Missouri River, S. Dak__________________________________________________________________ 14 Marmarth, N. Dak________________________________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]