DOCSLIB.ORG

A Comparative Analysis of Three Versions of 2 Samuel 21:1-14

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Comparative Analysis of Three Versions of 2 Samuel 21:1-14 A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THREE VERSIONS OF 2 SAMUEL 2 1: 1- 14 by Daniel Lee McNaughton A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Emmanuel College of Victoria University and the Biblical Department of the Toronto School of TheoIogy in partial fulfillment of the requiremenis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Theology awarded by the University of St. Michael's College Toronto 2000 @ Daniel Lee McNaughton National Library Bibliothèque nationale du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographic Services services bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395. rue WdingtOC) OnawaON K1AM OnawaON KlAW Canada Canada The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive licence dowing the exclusive permettant à la National Libraiy of Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distribute or seil reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies of this thesis in microform, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic foxmats. la forme de microfiche/fiim, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantial extracts fiom it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be pririted or otherwise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son pemiission. autorisation. A Comparative Analysis of 'ThreP Versions of 2 Samuel 21 : 1 -14 by Daniel b Mchkwghton A Thesis submitted to the Facuity of Emmanuel Cdege of Victoria University and the Biblid DPpartment of the Toronto School of Theology in partial fidfihent of the quknients of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Thedogy awarded by the University of St Michael's College Toronto 20 This thesis is a comparative anaiysis of tkversions of the bibliml stcxy found in 2 Samuel 2 1: 1- 14. In spite of evidence for diverse versions of Samuel, commentators and modern translations have assumeci that the Hebxew and Greek versions are geneticaily related and that textual problems can be solved by reconstructing derstages of the capying pnress. Whiie some textual difficulties have bcai solved usiag the rwonstnictive method, other texaral divergeIICies resist being explainai as anns in the transmissional process and appear uistead to represent altemate versions. This dissertation argues that Codex Coisiinianus (M),Codex Vaticanus (B), and the Masoretic text (m) are three discrete versions of 2Sam. 2 1: 1-14 wtuch refiect diffaent theological and political intaests. The dissertation begins with a summary of the awareness of mncesbetween the Greek and HcacW versions hmthe first century AD. to the pnseat and a rationale for interpreting manuscripts independently and compatively. Manuscripts M, m, and B of 2Sam. 2 1: 1- 14 are transïated, analyzd, and in- independently and tben compared. The research shows that the three versions agree in their words and word or&r throughout most of the story. Where the vasais differ, some of the diffefences are the result of transmissional erron, conflations, and stylistic improvements, while others point to different Hebrew tex& 'Ihe diffaias, far from haphazsad, cluster amund political and theological issues: Saul's kingship, David's role in wiping out Saul's descendants, God's ii role, the role of outsiders in Isaelite community. Each version addresses these theological and political issues hmdifferent perspectives. The dissertatian then explores ideollogical contexts within which each version of tbe story is at home. In the conclusion, the dissertation gives a brief analygs of the value and i~sultsof the comparative method dong with unne implications of this study fatextual criticism and the literary approach to the Bible. The dissertation coricludes that scholars should intapret the actuai versions and be careful about reconstructing a hypothetid oldest version where the data does not support it. iii 1 would lik to take the oppominity to give thanks to the Lord without whom there would neither be versions of the Biblical text nor a reason to read the versions we & have. I want to also express my gratitude to Staniey D. Walters of Rosedale Presbyterian Church and Knox Coiiege who first introduced me to the diffkzent versions of the stories in Samuel. He has been a constant source of support and encuuragemait thugh this project. 1 also want to thank GddT. Sheppard of Emmanuel Cdlege for his continua1 challenge to rpad the Bible aitidyand as Saipturie. I un grateful to the Advanced Degr& Stuclies Cornmittee at Emmanuel College for the RRobe IaiLaidlaw Schokhip. 1 want to thank the GRAMCORD Institute for allowing me io be a beta tester for the L?~cproject. It sped up my work cunsiderably. 1 am al- gnucfd for my children (nerisse and Seth, my immediate family, my chiirch fanulies, and the Vaky Forge Christian wegecomrnunity Who supported me financialiy, emotidy, and in thBr payas. DEDICATION To Amy PREFACE This study is a comparative analysis of three versions of 2 Samuel 2 1: 1- 14 as presented in manuscripts M, m, and B. Although I wiil ernploy textaitical methods, rny primary focus is neither histarid raicinstniciive nathe establishment of sequence of the fmsof this narrative in histoncai order. 1 have henneneutic umcedlls that go beyond textual and historicai in ta est^. The primary foais of this work is the inkrpmation of acnial texts and not the reconstruction of a hypothetical earliest text 'Ibis thesis seeb to identify, interpret and compare the thrœ versions of 2 Sam. 21: 1-14.1 hope to show that some of the differences between these versions cannot be resolved as ernrrs in the transmissional process but raher as differences in ideology. TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACï ................................................................................... ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .................................................................... DEDICATION ................................................................................. PREFACE...................................................................................... LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................ INTRODUCrION .................................................................. Awareness of Differences Between the Greek and Hebrew Texts in the First Five Centuries A.D ....................................... Awareness of Diffaerices Between the Hebrew and Greek Texts Suice the 16th Centrny ................................................. Divergent Readings in the Greek and Hebrew Texts of Samuel ........... The Significanœ of niis Study ................................................ Interpretatim of llme Versions of 2 Samuel 21: 1-14 ...................... Defining Terms ................................................................... INTERPRETATION OF UNCIAL MANUSCRIPT M'S VERSION OF 2 SAMUEL 21:l-14 ........................................................ The Text of M .................................................................... Translation and Notes of M ..................................................... intequemion of M ............................................................... INTERPRET'ATION OF THE MASORETIC TEXI"S VERSION OF 2 SAMUEL, 21:l-14 ........................................................ TheTextofm ................................................................... Translation and Notes ofnI ..................................................... Interprietationofm ..... .......................................................... INTERPRETATION OF UNCIAL MANUSCRIVT B'S VERSION OF2 SAMUEL21:l-14 ................................................*....... The Text of B ..................................................................... Translation and Notes of B ...................................................... Interpretation of B ................................................................ vii 5. A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE M, !R, AND B VERSIONS OF2 SAMUEL21:1-14 ........................................................ Introduction ................... ...... ........................................... A Summary of the Similarities Among M, nt, and B ......................... The Story Common to M, rn, and B ................... .... .... ................ A Summary of the Differences Between M, IR, and B.. ..................... Transmissional Errors, Conflations and Glosses ................... Sty listic Differences and Improvements.. ........................... The Same Hebrew Consonants with Different Vawei Pointhg ... Different Hebrew Consonants........-..................-..-.......... nieological and ibliticai Issues Raised By the Mererices in M,m,and B ............................ .. ................................ Merences Regarding Saul in the Versions.. ....................... Diff'erences Regardhg David in the Versions ....................... Diffkenœs Regarding God in the Versions.. ....................... DBkences Regarding the Social Outsiders in the Versiais.. ..... Thmlogical and Politid ïntsests of M, in, and B.. ......................... ?he Theo1ogica.i and Political Interests of M ........................ 'Ik Theological and Political Intcnsti of m ........................ The nieological and Politid Iriterests of B ......................... I~logicalContexts of M, m, and B .......................................... The Ideological Context of M ......................................... The Ideoiogical Cmmt of m ........................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 Samuel 2:1-2 Like Mary, Hannah Magnified God After Her Son's Birth. I
    1 Samuel 2:1-2 Like Mary, Hannah magnified God after her son’s birth. I. Hannah praised God for His deliverance (2:1). A. She prayed: It was a hymn of thanksgiving. B. She praised God for her deliverance. 4 lines of poetry that Mary borrowed from in her song: 1. My heart exalts in the LORD. a. Heart = throne of her soul b. Exults = to be pumped up i. Her grieving heartache of barrenness is gone. ii. It is replaced with a grateful heart of praise to God. c. In the LORD i. The LORD brought her heart to rejoice. ii. He was the object of her praise. d. Mary was also elated. i. Elizabeth told her that she was carrying the Lord. ii. She used Hannah’s words to express her own soul. iii. Lk 1:46 And Mary said: "My soul exalts the Lord. 2. My horn is exulted in the LORD. a. Horn is a symbol of strength and vitality. i. Horns were used by animals for defense and attack. ii. Some of you have deer horns that picture might. iii. In Hannah’s neck of the woods sheep and oxen horns symbolized strength. b. Hannah credits the LORD for lifting her vitality to bear a child, to give him back to God, and to give her joy. 3. My mouth speaks boldly against my enemies. a. She has much to speak freely about. b. She can speak to Peninnah (1:2) her rival/enemy (1:6), who mocked and ridiculed her weakness. 4. H’s reason for song, strength, & speech is God’s salvation.
    [Show full text]
  • Mephibosheth
    No. 15 Mephibosheth surrounded Nathan Hiram Solomon Asaph Jeduthun Adonijah Heman Abishag “the child” Araunah Gad the Cushite Jonathan Uriah Bathsheba Nathan Ahimaaz Abiathar Chileab Zadok Ahimelech Abigail Nabal Uzzah Obed-Edom Hadadezer Samuel Benaiah Doeg Achish Goliath David Saul Merab Eliab Jonathan Michal Jesse Zeruiah Mephibosheth Ziba Rechab & Baanah Joab Abner Ishbosheth Abishiai Talmai Shimei Barzillai Absalom Tamar Asahel Sheba Amasa Amnon Hushai Ahithophel Ahinoam pe vid ople in the life of Da © 2013 Jon F. Mahar, Hakusan City, Japan, Alexander, Maine, U.S.A. about Mephibosheth 1.) Mephibosheth was introduce briefly 5.) It’s helpful to ask what connection, in 2 Sam. 4:4 as a son of Jonathan if any, there may have been between who was lame because of a childhood Mephibosheth’s godly character and accident. His age and lameness prob- his physical handicap and weak social ably disqualified him from becoming position. As the grandson of king Saul king of Israel. He was only five when it was natural for him to be afraid of his father died and probably only about David (9:6-7, 19:28). But the bigger seven or eight when his much older question is if God had used his handi- brother, King Ishbosheth, died. cap to make him a godly man. 2.) Mephibosheth was probably over- 6.) The adjective, “humble,” is derived looked and spared by those who killed from the verb “to humble” which often Ishbosheth in ch. four because of his has to do with being afflicted or op- handicap, as well as because of his pressed, like the people of Israel in young age.
    [Show full text]
  • Different Editions of the Song of Hannah and of Its
    CHAPTER TWENTY-NINE DIFFERENT EDITIONS OF THE SONG OF HANNAH AND OF ITS NARRATIVE FRAMEWORK 1. Introduction The differences between MT (with which T,1 S, and V more or less agree) and the LXX2 in the Song of Hannah are mentioned in the commentaries and in several monographic studies of that poem.3 The sources differ in many small details, as well as in major ones in vv. 1, 2, 6, 9, 10. These major discrepancies consist of differences, omissions, and additions (when using these terms, MT is taken as point of departure without taking a stand regarding the originality of the readings of that text). As far as I know, the differences between MT and the ancient versions of the Song of Hannah and its narrative framework have not been discussed in a monographic treatment,4 with the exception of Walters, “Hannah and Anna” (on the relation between the MT and LXX); nor have the differences between MT and 4QSama been discussed. When deviating from MT, this scroll often agrees with the LXX and/or LXXLuc (see Tov, “Qumran,”* and “4QSama”*). The differences between the Qumran scroll and MT have been put forward in Cross, “New Qumran 1 See D.J. Harrington, “The Apocalypse of Hannah: Targum Jonathan of 1 Samuel 2:1- 10,” in D.M. Golomb (ed.), “Working with No Data,” Semitic and Egyptian Studies Presented to Thomas O. Lambdin (Winona Lake, IN 1987) 147-152. 2 The Old Latin version is more or less identical with the LXX. See in detail P.A.H. de Boer, “Confirmatum est cor meum—Remarks on the Old Latin Text of the Song of Hannah 1 Samuel ii 1-10,” OTS 13 (1963) 173-213; idem, “Once Again the Old Latin Text of Hannah’s Song,” OTS 14 (1965) 206-213.
    [Show full text]
  • The Biographical Method of Bible Study (P. Rhebergen)
    Method 5 - The Biographical Method of Bible Study (P. Rhebergen) 5.1 - Tools 5.1.1 - Bible 5.1.2 - Exhaustive and / or biographical concordance 5.1.3 - Topical Bible 5.1.4 - Bible dictionary or encyclopedia 5.2 - Hints 5.2.1 - Remember that the person will often be referred to by means other than his / her proper name in many passages. 5.3 - Steps Step 1 - Choose an individual from the Bible for your study. See the list below for a selection of persons from the Bible. Step 2 - List all references concerning that person. A concordance will help if the person is referred to in the Bible by their proper name, but you may also wish to look for ambiguous references to the person (ie: Pharaoh’s wife or the son of Zebedee). Step 3 - Note your first impression of the person after your first reading of the passages. Step 4 - Make a chronological outline of the person's life after your second reading. Step 5 - Obtain some insights into the person after your third reading. Step 6 - Identify some character qualities after your fourth reading. Step 7 - Show how some other Bible truths are illustrated in this person's life. Step 8 - Summarize the main lesson(s) you have learned. Step 9 - Write out a personal application. Step 10 - Make your study transferable. Step 11 - Note someone with whom you will share the results of this study and commit yourself to doing this. A Partial List of Biblical People The three following lists include some of the major men of the Bible, the minor but important men of the Bible, and the prominent women of the Bible.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 and 2 Samuel, by Robert Vannoy, Lecture 1
    1 Dr. Robert Vannoy, Samuels, Lecture 1 © 2011, Dr. Robert Vannoy and Ted Hildebrandt What I want to do in a series of four lectures is speak about the books of First and Second Samuel and see how what is contained in these two important Old Testament books fits into the storyline of the whole of the Bible. So, this is the first of four lectures on First and Second Samuel. When one reads the Old Testament, I think one of the first things that needs to be considered is the literary character or the genre of the material being read. The books of First and Second Samuel, to which we will be giving our attention in these lectures, find their place among what is generally known as the historical books of the Old Testament. Because historical books have a different literary character than, for example, the law books or the poetic books or the wisdom literature, they require a reading strategy that is appropriate to their literary character. So, in these four lectures on First and Second Samuel, I want to begin by saying something about the nature of the historical writing of the Old Testament. I do this because the way in which we understand the nature of Old Testament historiography has a very important influence on the way in which we read and understand the narratives of First and Second Samuel. So let me start by asking a general question: What kind of history writing do we find in the Old Testament? And how does a proper assessment of the character of Old Testament historiography help us to read and understand the narratives of the Old Testament in an appropriate way? I then want to go on to say something more specific about how a proper understanding of the nature of Old Testament historiography helps us to read and understand the books of First and Second Samuel in an appropriate way.
    [Show full text]
  • 11-Judges-1 Samuel Notes
    Old Testament History Lesson #11 Judges 8:1-1 Samuel 2:11 Outline I. Cycles Of Apostasy, Judgment, And Deliverance (Judges 2:6-16:31) A. Failure of the judges to maintain Israel’s faithfulness (3:7-16:31). 1. Gideon (6:1-9:57). a) The conquests of Gideon (7:1-8:35). b) Abimelech’s murder of his brothers (9:1-9:57). 2. Tola (10:1-2). 3. Jair (10:3-5). 4. Jephthah (10:6-12:7). 5. Ibzan (12:8-10). 6. Elon (12:11-12). 7. Abdon (12:13-15). 8. Samson (13:1-16:31). B. The extent of Israel’s depravity (17:1-21:24). 1. Idolatry among the Danites (17:1-18:31). 2. Civil war: Israel against Benjamin (19:1-20:24). C. Summary of the condition of Israel (21:25). II. The Story Of Ruth (Ruth 1:1-4:22) A. Naomi loses a family (1:1-5). B. Naomi returns from Moab (1:6-22). 1. Ruth pledges to go with Naomi (1:6-18). 2. Naomi’s bitter return to Bethlehem (1:19-22). C. Ruth goes to work in the fields of Boaz (2:1-23). 1. Ruth begins work (2:1-7). 2. Ruth and Boaz meet (2:8-16). 3. Ruth returns to Naomi (2:17-23). D. Ruth visits Boaz at the threshing floor (3:1-18). 1. Naomi’s instructions (3:1-5). 2. Boaz’s pledge to redeem Ruth (3:6-15). 3. Ruth returns to Naomi (3:14-18). E.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Samuel 2 Sermon Zuph, an Ephraimite.)
    1 Samuel 2 Sermon Zuph, an Ephraimite.). He had two wives. The first he had married for love, and they 17th September 2017 could have been happy, but they were unable to have children, and so he married again. Reading 1 Samuel 2:1-10 His first wife was heartbroken, and humiliated by his actions. The new wife had 1 Hannah prayed and said, children, but knew that she wasn’t really loved. And so she became bitter and ‘My heart exults in the Lord; mocked her rival. my strength is exalted in my God.[a] My mouth derides my enemies, This unhappy situation, helped little by the clumsiness of the husband, showing because I rejoice in my[b] victory. favouritism towards Hannah, and therefore making her rival more bitter and 2 ‘There is no Holy One like the Lord, jealous, and then saying things like v8 “‘Hannah, why do you weep? Why is your no one besides you; heart sad? Am I not more to you than ten sons?’” there is no Rock like our God. 3 Talk no more so very proudly, What a great start to a story. let not arrogance come from your mouth; Have you ever thought it strange that when God chooses to reveal his truth he does for the Lord is a God of knowledge, so through story. The vast majority of the Biblical text isn’t law, rules, abstract and by him actions are weighed. theology, it is narrative. 4 The bows of the mighty are broken, but the feeble gird on strength.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nature of David's Kingship at Hebron: an Exegetical and Theological Study of 2 Samuel 2:1-5:5
    Andrews University Digital Commons @ Andrews University Dissertations Graduate Research 2019 The Nature of David's Kingship at Hebron: An Exegetical and Theological Study of 2 Samuel 2:1-5:5 Christian Vogel Andrews University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations Part of the Biblical Studies Commons Recommended Citation Vogel, Christian, "The Nature of David's Kingship at Hebron: An Exegetical and Theological Study of 2 Samuel 2:1-5:5" (2019). Dissertations. 1684. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations/1684 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Research at Digital Commons @ Andrews University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Andrews University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ABSTRACT THE NATURE OF DAVID’S KINGSHIP AT HEBRON: AN EXEGETICAL AND THEOLOGICAL STUDY OF 2 SAMUEL 2:1—5:5 by Christian Vogel Adviser: Richard M. Davidson ABSTRACT OF GRADUATE STUDENT RESEARCH Dissertation Andrews University Seventh-day Adventist Theological Seminary Title: THE NATURE OF DAVID’S KINGSHIP AT HEBRON: AN EXEGETICAL AND THEOLOGICAL STUDY OF 2 SAMUEL 2:1—5:5 Name of researcher: Christian Vogel Name and degree of faculty adviser: Richard M. Davidson, Ph.D. Date completed: June 2019 The account of David’s reign at Hebron found in 2 Samuel 2:1—5:5 constitutes a somewhat neglected, yet crucial part of the David narrative, chronicling David’s first years as king. This dissertation investigates these chapters by means of a close reading of the Hebrew text in order to gain a better understanding of the nature of David’s kingship as it is presented in this literary unit.
    [Show full text]
  • Compositry and Creativity in 2 Samuel 21:1–14
    JBL 122/1 (2003) 23–52 COMPOSITRY AND CREATIVITY IN 2 SAMUEL 21:1–14 SIMEON CHAVEL [email protected] The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel Despite a cluster of contrary indications, scholars have routinely inter- preted the story of the three-year famine in 2 Sam 21:1–14 as an internally con- sistent, homogeneous narrative.1 This perception of the story may derive in part from its place as a link in 2 Sam 21–24, the chain of chapters closing the book of Samuel. Since Julius Wellhausen noted the palistrophe in chs. 21–24 over a century ago, this appendix compiled from disparate elements has tended to invite several kinds of literary approaches: structural analysis concerned pri- marily with its organization; interest in the lemmatic and thematic links govern- ing its different parts; and a broader redactional view that seeks its meaning within the wider frameworks of the Succession Narrative, 2 Samuel, the com- plete book of Samuel, and the Deuteronomistic History.2 At least with regard to the Gibeonite episode, the focus on the literary shape and function of the Thanks to Isaac Chavel, Baruch Schwartz, Michael Segal, and the JBL critical readers for their helpful comments. Translations are mine except where otherwise attributed. 1 Survey the standard introductions and commentaries, for example, Carl Steuernagel, Lehrbuch der Einleitung in das Alte Testament (Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck, 1912), 311, 326–27, 334–36. Only three attempts have been made to divide the story into sources; see below, nn. 5 and 31. 2 Julius Wellhausen, Die Composition des Hexateuchs und der historischen Bucher des Alten Testaments (3d ed.; Berlin: Georg Reimer, 1899), 260–61; Karl Budde, Die Bücher Samuel (KHAT; Tübingen/Leipzig: Mohr-Siebeck, 1902), xi, 304; Peter J.
    [Show full text]
  • I Kings – Study Guide Lessons 1-3
    I Kings – Study Guide Lessons 1-3 Preface: In this study guide we will return to our study of the life of the Children of Israel and pick up where we left off at the end of II Samuel, with the continuation of King David’s reign. I have written this study guide for the Tuesday morning Ladies’ Bible Study at Independent Presbyterian Church, Savannah, GA in the year of our Lord, 2014 - 2015. I have used the commentary “I Kings, The Wisdom and the Folly,” by Dale Ralph Davis as my main source and guide. This book and others I have used are listed at the end of this study in the Bibliography. All scripture quotes are from the English Standard Version of the Bible (ESV) unless otherwise stated. All references cited without a preceding book name (i.e. 4:3) are assumed to be in the book of I Kings. All other references include book, chapter and verse (i.e. James 2:10) Lesson 1 – I Kings 1:1-53 The Book of Kings (what we call “I and II Kings”) is a continuation of the narrative history of the Children of Israel from the end of David’s reign to the end of the final king of the Davidic line – King Zedekiah. It covers a period of about 400 years and was originally written as all one book, but was later separated into two books, which is what we find in our bibles today. Jewish tradition holds that it was written by the prophet Jeremiah, but we cannot know for certain since the author does not identify himself in the book.
    [Show full text]
  • Rizpah Mourns Her Sons
    What happens when our world falls apart? How do we press onward when our tightly-knit plans unravel into loose ends? What do we become when our identity—or the path we’re on—comes undone? What if all this is not the end we fear it will be? In our unraveling, sometimes life surprises us with unexpected joy, love, and hope—with a new beginning we couldn’t have imagined. Sometimes we need God to unravel us, for we long to be changed. Throughout the summer we will explore biblical stories of unraveled shame, identity, fear, grief, dreams, and expectations. There are stories where God meets us in the spiraling, unraveling our plans—and us—into something new. 2 Samuel 3:7; 21:1-14 – Rizpah Mourns Her Sons: Public Grief That Inspires Action The story of Rizpah is unfamiliar to many of us, perhaps because it never appears in the Revised Common Lectionary and because it is a very disturbing story! It is set in a time of Israel’s history when there was great turmoil and transition. The great leaders like Moses, who led the Exodus, and Joshua, who led the settlement in Canaan, are gone. The movement from a collection of tribes ruled judges to a centralized monarchy under King David was long, hard, and often violent, involving threats from rival nations and from within Israel itself. Saul, the first legitimate king, has died and what amounts to a civil war ensues between David and the heirs and followers of Saul, and the most venerable members of their households, their wives and children, become tools in the conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • Bible Survey II Glossary of Terms
    Bible Survey II Glossary of Terms I & II Samuel Abiathar -- Son of Ahimelech. Survived slaughter of priests by Saul and Doeg the Edomite. Served as high priest during David’s reign. Banished by Solomon for promoting Adonijah over Solomon for King. (1 Sam. 22-23; 2 Sam. 15; 1 Kings 1) Abigail -- Wife of Nabal. Acted as peacemaker between David and Nabal. Married David after Nabal died. (1 Sam. 25) Abishai -- Nephew of David. Brother of Joab and Asahel. Loyal soldier and one of David’s Mighty Men. Commander of David’s group of thirty. Saved David’s life in battle. (1 Sam. 26; 2 Sam. 10, 18, 21, 23) Abner -- Cousin of Saul. Commander of Saul’s army. Switched allegiance from Saul and Ish-Bosheth to David. Assassinated by Joab in revenge for killing Asahel. (1 Sam. 14, 17, 26; 2 Sam. 2-3) Absalom -- Third son of David. Arranged for death of Amnon to avenge his sister Tamar. Fled in exile, returned to Jerusalem three years later, reconciled with David after two more years, then instigated a rebellion and drove David into exile. Finally killed by Joab and mourned by David. Name means “Father is peace.” (2 Sam. 3, 12, 14-19) Achish -- Philistine king of Gath. Gave David refuge from Saul. Commander of army which killed Saul and Jonathan. (1 Sam. 21, 27, 31) Adonijah -- Fourth son of David. Apparent heir to throne, but passed over in favor of Solomon. Instigated a rebellion and proclaimed himself king. Killed by Solomon. (2 Sam. 3; 1 Kings 1-2) Ahimelech -- Priest at Nob.
    [Show full text]