DOCSLIB.ORG

Bridging the Historic Mainstreet with the Future of Light Rail

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bridging the Historic Mainstreet with the Future of Light Rail 2009 Hopkins Downtown: Bridging the Historic Mainstreet with the Future of Light Rail Greta Alquist, Andrew Guthrie, and Cole Hiniker GretaHubert Alquist, H. Humphrey Andrew Institute Guthrie, of and Publi Colec Affairs Hiniker Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs 5/5/2009 5/5/2009 0 | P a g e TABLE OF CONTENTS BEST PRACTICES ....................................................................................... 29 CASE STUDIES .......................................................................................... 31 DIAGNOSIS ............................................................................................. 1 A VISION FOR HOPKINS ........................................................................ 34 PROBLEM STATEMENT ................................................................................. 1 PICTURE THIS: A NARRATIVE OF THE FUTURE ................................................. 34 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................... 1 BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN .............................................................................. 34 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................. 2 TROLLEY SERVICE ...................................................................................... 36 STREETCAR/BUS CIRCULATOR SCOPING STUDY .................................................... 4 MIXED USE ZONING .................................................................................. 36 PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE CIRCULATION STUDY ................................................... 4 MIXED USE ZONING DISTRICT STUDY ................................................................ 4 A PLAN FOR ACTION............................................................................. 38 STRENGTHS, WEAKNESSES, OPPORTUNITIES, AND THREATS ................................ 5 STRENGTHS ................................................................................................ 5 COMPONENTS OF THE ACTION PLAN AND THEIR LINK TO THE VISION STATEMENT . 38 WEAKNESSES ............................................................................................. 6 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN ....................................................... 39 OPPORTUNITIES .......................................................................................... 8 RECOMMENDATION ONE: SHARED SPACE TREATMENT ..................................... 39 THREATS ................................................................................................... 8 RECOMMENDATION TWO: BICYCLE TRAIL CONNECTION ..................................... 42 STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS .............................................................................. 9 RECOMMENDATION THREE: ADJUST SIGNAL TIMING AT EIGHTH AND EXCELSIOR FOR PEDESTRIAN & BICYCLE CIRCULATION SCOPING STUDY .................................... 11 HIGHER PEDESTRIAN LEVEL OF SERVICE ........................................................... 43 EXISTING CONDITIONS - PEDESTRIAN ............................................................. 11 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN STEPS .................................................................. 44 BEST PRACTICES ........................................................................................ 12 TRANSIT ACTION PLAN .............................................................................. 45 CASE STUDIES........................................................................................... 15 CIRCULATOR ROUTE 1 ................................................................................ 47 EXISTING CONDITIONS - BICYCLE................................................................... 17 CIRCULATOR ROUTE 2 ................................................................................ 49 BEST PRACTICES ........................................................................................ 17 CIRCULATOR ROUTE 3 ................................................................................ 51 STREETCAR/BUS CIRCULATOR SCOPING STUDY............................................... 18 CIRCULATOR BUS FEATURES ........................................................................ 53 EXISTING CONDITIONS ................................................................................ 18 STREETCAR ROUTE .................................................................................... 54 SOUTHWEST LRT CHANGES ......................................................................... 20 STOPS AND SIGNAGE ................................................................................. 58 BEST PRACTICES ........................................................................................ 21 MIXED-USE ZONING ACTION PLAN .............................................................. 60 CASE STUDIES – RUBBER TIRES..................................................................... 23 RECOMMENDATIONS/OBJECTIVES ................................................................ 60 CASE STUDY—STEEL WHEEL ON STEEL RAIL ..................................................... 25 CONCLUSION ........................................................................................ 63 SUMMARY ............................................................................................... 26 MIXED-USE ZONING SCOPING STUDY ........................................................... 28 REFERENCES ......................................................................................... 64 EXISTING CONDITIONS ................................................................................ 28 1 DIAGNOSIS mainline. By 1905, high-speed electric, PROBLEM STATEMENT interurban streetcar service – part of The City of Hopkins seeks the tools necessary to maximize the potential Twin City Rapid of the downtown light rail transit (LRT) station on the proposed Transit's line to Lake Southwest Transitway, especially in terms of: Minnetonka – had also reached Redevelopment around the station and Hopkins.2 As a result Connecting the station area to downtown/Mainstreet of its initial development as a late-nineteenth century railroad town, rather than a The city intends the downtown station, and the planning efforts mid-twentieth century suburb, Hopkins developed as a compact, full- connected with it, to provide opportunities for redevelopment and the service community, centered on a “Mainstreet” business district. attraction of visitors, as well as to enhance the existing downtown experience. During the mid and late-twentieth century, much more automobile- oriented bedroom suburbs grew up around Hopkins and now surround INTRODUCTION the community on all sides. Hopkins' own transportation infrastructure is now primarily road based as well, with Trunk Highway 7 - north of Hopkins, Minnesota is an incorporated city of roughly 18,000 people, downtown, US Highway 169 - immediately to the east of downtown, and and occupies an approximate area of four square miles in the Excelsior Boulevard - immediately to the south of downtown. These southwestern portion of the Twin Cities metropolitan area. Unique routes form the primary regional transportation infrastructure of within the inner-suburban areas of the metro, Hopkins developed long Hopkins. Of the three railroads which once served Hopkins, only a before being captured into the metropolitan orbit of the Twin Cities. A truncated, single-track shadow of the Milwaukee Road main remains product of late-nineteenth century railroad building, Hopkins grew up active as the Twin Cities and Western Railroad. (The Minneapolis & Saint along a major rail corridor as a traditional Midwestern small town along Louis' and Great Northern's rights-of-way have been converted to branches of the Minneapolis and Saint Louis Railroad and the Great Northern Railroad, as well as what would eventually become the Chicago, Milwaukee, Saint Paul, and Pacific Railroad's transcontinental 1 Totten & Timken, ed. 1965. 2 Isaacs, 2005. 1 | P a g e 1 regional multi-use trails.) The last streetcar ran to Hopkins in 1951, PROJECT DESCRIPTION though its route is largely duplicated by Metro Transit bus routes.2 In terms of transportation, the City of Hopkins may soon come full circle, Today, downtown Hopkins survives as a vibrant center of commerce and thanks to the proposed Southwest Transitway. Currently nearing the end entertainment for the city. The relatively new Center for the Arts, of the Alternatives Analysis phase of the Federal Transit Administration featuring a 750-seat theatre, art gallery, and educational and meeting (FTA) New Starts funding process, the options under consideration for space, is a growing regional destination located right on Mainstreet. the Transitway have been narrowed to four generally similar route Unusual in having a well-preserved small town Mainstreet relatively 3 options. All of the remaining options feature LRT and all would run close in to the heart of the metro, downtown Hopkins has become through Hopkins on the former Minneapolis & St. Louis right-of-way something of a unique regional entertainment destination. In addition to currently owned by the Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority retaining its vibrancy and importance, downtown Hopkins retains much (HCRRA). Three stations are planned for Hopkins, one each at Blake of its traditional built Road, Downtown Hopkins, and Shady Oak Road. This project focuses on form, with classical the Downtown Hopkins station, located at the intersection of Eighth
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Power of Small State of Main Is Published As a Membership Benefi T of Main Street America, a Program of the National Main Street Center
    A PUBLICATION OF MAIN STREET AMERICA WINTER 2018 The Power of Small State of Main is published as a membership benefi t of Main Street America, a program of the National Main Street Center. For information on how to join Main Street America, please visit mainstreet.org/main-street/join/. National Main Street Center, Inc. Patrice Frey President and CEO Board of Directors: Editorial Staff: Social Media: Ed McMahon, Chair Rachel Bowdon TWITTER: @NatlMainStreet Darryl Young, Vice Chair Editor in Chief Senior Manager of Content David J. Brown Development FACEBOOK: Kevin Daniels @NationalMainStreetCenter Emily Wallrath Schmidt Samuel B. Dixon Editor Joe Grills Associate Manager of INSTAGRAM: @NatlMainStreet Irvin M. Henderson Communications Laura Krizov Hannah White Contact: Mary Thompson Editor Tel.: 312.610.5611 Director of Outreach and Engagement Email: [email protected] Design: Website: mainstreet.org The Nimble Bee Main Street America has been helping revitalize older and historic commercial districts for more than 35 years. Today it is a network of more than 1,600 neighborhoods and communi- ties, rural and urban, who share both a commitment to place and to building stronger communities through preservation-based economic development. Main Street Ameri- ca is a program of the nonprofi t National Main Street Center, a subsidiary of the National Trust for Historic Preservation. © 2018 National Main Street Center, All Rights Reserved WINTER Table of contents 2018 3 President’s Note By Patrice Frey 5 Editor’s Note By Rachel Bowdon
    [Show full text]
  • Union Station Conceptual Engineering Study
    Portland Union Station Multimodal Conceptual Engineering Study Submitted to Portland Bureau of Transportation by IBI Group with LTK Engineering June 2009 This study is partially funded by the US Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration. IBI GROUP PORtlAND UNION STATION MultIMODAL CONceptuAL ENGINeeRING StuDY IBI Group is a multi-disciplinary consulting organization offering services in four areas of practice: Urban Land, Facilities, Transportation and Systems. We provide services from offices located strategically across the United States, Canada, Europe, the Middle East and Asia. JUNE 2009 www.ibigroup.com ii Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................... ES-1 Chapter 1: Introduction .....................................................................................1 Introduction 1 Study Purpose 2 Previous Planning Efforts 2 Study Participants 2 Study Methodology 4 Chapter 2: Existing Conditions .........................................................................6 History and Character 6 Uses and Layout 7 Physical Conditions 9 Neighborhood 10 Transportation Conditions 14 Street Classification 24 Chapter 3: Future Transportation Conditions .................................................25 Introduction 25 Intercity Rail Requirements 26 Freight Railroad Requirements 28 Future Track Utilization at Portland Union Station 29 Terminal Capacity Requirements 31 Penetration of Local Transit into Union Station 37 Transit on Union Station Tracks
    [Show full text]
  • 10 – Eurocruise - Porto Part 4 - Heritage Streetcar Operations
    10 – Eurocruise - Porto Part 4 - Heritage Streetcar Operations On Wednesday morning Luis joined us at breakfast in our hotel, and we walked a couple of blocks in a light fog to a stop on the 22 line. The STCP heritage system consists of three routes, numbered 1, 18 and 22. The first two are similar to corresponding services from the days when standard- gauge streetcars were the most important element in Porto’s transit system. See http://www.urbanrail.net/eu/pt/porto/porto-tram.htm. The three connecting heritage lines run every half-hour, 7 days per week, starting a little after the morning rush hour. Routes 1 and 18 are single track with passing sidings, while the 22 is a one-way loop, with a short single-track stub at its outer end. At its Carmo end the 18 also traverses a one-way loop through various streets. Like Lisbon, the tramway operated a combination of single- and double- truck Brill-type cars in its heyday, but now regular service consists of only the deck-roofed 4-wheelers, which have been equipped with magnetic track brakes. Four such units are operated each day, as the 1 line is sufficiently long to need two cars. The cars on the road on Wednesday were 131, 205, 213 and 220. All were built by the CCFP (Porto’s Carris) from Brill blueprints. The 131 was completed in 1910, while the others came out of the shops in the late 1930s-early 1940s. Porto also has an excellent tram museum, which is adjacent to the Massarelos carhouse, where the rolling stock for the heritage operation is maintained.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Planning Practice in the Age of Transit-Oriented Development by Ian Robinson Carlton a Dissertation Submitted in Partial
    Transit Planning Practice in the Age of Transit-Oriented Development By Ian Robinson Carlton A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in City & Regional Planning in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Daniel Chatman, Chair Professor Robert Cervero Professor Dwight Jaffee Fall 2013 © Copyright by Ian Robinson Carlton 2013 All Rights Reserved Abstract Transit Planning Practice in the Age of Transit-Oriented Development by Ian Robinson Carlton Doctor of Philosophy in City & Regional Planning University of California, Berkeley Professor Daniel Chatman, Chair Globally, urban development near transit stations has long been understood to be critical to transit’s success primarily because it can contribute to ridership and improve the efficiency of transit investments. In the United States in particular, fixed-guideway transit’s land use-shaping capability has been an important justification and goal for transit investment. In fact, today’s U.S. federal funding policies increasingly focus on achieving transit-oriented real estate development near new transit infrastructure. However, the widespread implementation of transit and land use coordination practices has been considered an uphill battle. The academic literature suggests the most effective practice may be for U.S. transit planners to locate transit stations where pre-existing conditions are advantageous for real estate development or transit investments can generate the political will to dramatically alter local conditions to make them amenable to real estate development. However, prior to this study, no research had investigated the influence of real estate development considerations on U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Cost Analysis of Bicycle Facilities: Refining Methods for Estimating the Effect of Bicycle Infrastructure on Use and Property Values
    GUIDELINES FOR BENEFIT- COST ANALYSIS OF BICYCLE FACILITIES: REFINING METHODS FOR ESTIMATING THE EFFECT OF BICYCLE INFRASTRUCTURE ON USE AND PROPERTY VALUES Project 06-07 June 2007 Midwest Regional University Transportation Center College of Engineering Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Wisconsin, Madison Prepared by: Gavin Poindexter, with the assistance of Kevin J. Krizek, Gary Barnes, and Kristen Thompson; Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN Principal Investigator: Kevin J. Krizek; Associate Professor, Urban and Regional Planning and Civil Engineering, Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota, Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. MRUTC 06-07 CFDA 20.701 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date June 2007 Optimization of Transportation Investment: Guidelines for Benefit-Cost Analysis of Bicycle Facilities: Refining methods for estimating the effect of bicycle infrastructure on use and property values 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author/s Gavin Poindexter, Kevin J. Krizek, Gary Barnes, Kristen Thompson 8. Performing Organization Report No. 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Midwest Regional University Transportation Center University of Wisconsin-Madison 11. Contract or Grant No. 1415 Engineering Drive, Madison, WI 53706 997B570 12. Sponsoring Organization Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered U.S. Department of Transportation Final Report [7/1/05 – 6/30/07] Research and Innovative Technology Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Washington, D.C. 20590 15. Supplementary Notes Project completed for the Midwest Regional University Transportation Center. 16.
    [Show full text]
  • Factors to Consider in Designing a Joint Bus-Light Rail Transit Mall
    156 TRB Special Report 195 Factors to Consider in Designing a Joint Bus-Light Rail Transit Mall R. DAVID MINISTER and DAVID J. CLARKE, Santa Clara County Transportation Agency Cities are turning more and more to bus and LRT transit planning, design, or construction of such a facility are mall solutions primarily because the costs of building a listed in Table 1. transit mall for servicing downtown areas are between $15 At about the same time that North American transit and $30 million per mile (1981 doilars) whereas building a experts were rediscovering the streetcar by visiting subway would cost between $60 and $120 million per mile modern light rail installations in Europe, an interest in bus in a CBD environment. Ongoing energy, maintenance, and transit malls began to spring up. First tested on Nicollet security costs are also much less with a transit mall than Avenue in Minneapolis in 1967, the basic idea of a transit with a subway station alternative, and pedestrian access is mall is to combine a pedestrian mall with an exclusive much quicker and easier, particularly for elderly and roadway for transit vehicles. In 1976, Portland, Oregon, handicapped persons. This paper identifies and describes received approval to construct a bus transit mall on 2 one- key design factors considered in the development of a joint way downtown streets. In the same year Chestnut Street bus-light rail transit mall for the downtown area in San in Philadelphia was converted into a bus transit mall in Jose, California. Other light rail mall designs researched time for celebrating the nations bicentennial.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit-Oriented Development and Joint Development in the United States: a Literature Review
    Transit Cooperative Research Program Sponsored by the Federal Transit Administration RESEARCH RESULTS DIGEST October 2002—Number 52 Subject Area: VI Public Transit Responsible Senior Program Officer: Gwen Chisholm Transit-Oriented Development and Joint Development in the United States: A Literature Review This digest summarizes the literature review of TCRP Project H-27, “Transit-Oriented Development: State of the Practice and Future Benefits.” This digest provides definitions of transit-oriented development (TOD) and transit joint development (TJD), describes the institutional issues related to TOD and TJD, and provides examples of the impacts and benefits of TOD and TJD. References and an annotated bibliography are included. This digest was written by Robert Cervero, Christopher Ferrell, and Steven Murphy, from the Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California, Berkeley. CONTENTS IV.2 Supportive Public Policies: Finance and Tax Policies, 46 I INTRODUCTION, 2 IV.3 Supportive Public Policies: Land-Based I.1 Defining Transit-Oriented Development, 5 Initiatives, 54 I.2 Defining Transit Joint Development, 7 IV.4 Supportive Public Policies: Zoning and I.3 Literature Review, 9 Regulations, 57 IV.5 Supportive Public Policies: Complementary II INSTITUTIONAL ISSUES, 10 Infrastructure, 61 II.1 The Need for Collaboration, 10 IV.6 Supportive Public Policies: Procedural and II.2 Collaboration and Partnerships, 12 Programmatic Approaches, 61 II.3 Community Outreach, 12 IV.7 Use of Value Capture, 66 II.4 Government Roles, 14
    [Show full text]
  • January–June 2005 · $10.00 / Rails To
    January–June 2005 · $10.00 / Rails to Rubber to Rails Again, Part 1: Alabama–Montana Headlights The Magazine of Electric Railways Published since 1939 by the Electric Railroaders’ Association, Inc. WWW.ERAUSA.ORG Staff Contents Editor and Art Director January–June 2005 Sandy Campbell Associate Editors Raymond R. Berger, Frank S. Miklos, John Pappas Contributors Edward Ridolph, Trevor Logan, Bill Volkmer, Columns Alan K. Weeks 2 News Electric Railroaders’ Compiled by Frank Miklos. International transportation reports. Association, Inc. E Two-Part Cover Story Board of Directors 2008 President 18 Rails to Rubber to Rails Again Frank S. Miklos By Edward Ridolph. An extensive 60-year summary of the street railway industry in First Vice President the U.S. and Canada, starting with its precipitous 30-year, post-World War II decline. William K. Guild It continues with the industry’s rebirth under the banner of “light rail” in the early Second Vice President & Corresponding Secretary 1980s, a renaissance which continues to this day. Raymond R. Berger Third Vice President & Recording Secretary Robert J. Newhouser Below: LAMTA P3 3156 is eastbound across the First Street bridge over the Los Treasurer Angeles River in the waning weeks of service before abandonment of Los Angeles’ Michael Glikin narrow gauge system on March 31, 1963. GERALD SQUIER PHOTO Director Jeffrey Erlitz Membership Secretary Sandy Campbell Officers 2008 Trip & Convention Chairman Jack May Librarian William K. Guild Manager of Publication Sales Raymond R. Berger Overseas Liason Officer James Mattina National Headquarters Grand Central Terminal, New York City A-Tower, Room 4A Mailing Address P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual (Part B)
    7UDQVLW&DSDFLW\DQG4XDOLW\RI6HUYLFH0DQXDO PART 2 BUS TRANSIT CAPACITY CONTENTS 1. BUS CAPACITY BASICS ....................................................................................... 2-1 Overview..................................................................................................................... 2-1 Definitions............................................................................................................... 2-1 Types of Bus Facilities and Service ............................................................................ 2-3 Factors Influencing Bus Capacity ............................................................................... 2-5 Vehicle Capacity..................................................................................................... 2-5 Person Capacity..................................................................................................... 2-13 Fundamental Capacity Calculations .......................................................................... 2-15 Vehicle Capacity................................................................................................... 2-15 Person Capacity..................................................................................................... 2-22 Planning Applications ............................................................................................... 2-23 2. OPERATING ISSUES............................................................................................ 2-25 Introduction..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Portuguese Trams Imported by Gales Creek Enterprises
    Volume 25 Issue 1 Spring 2020 Reminder to members: Please be sure your dues are In This Issue up to date. 2020 dues were due Jan 1, 2020. If it has Portuguese Trams – Richard Thompson ……………..…..…………….…1 been longer than one year since you renewed, go to Oregon Electric Railway Historical Society News…………………………2 Willamette Shore Trolley Update – Dave Rowe …………………..……..12 our website: oregontrolley.com and download an Donation Request ……………..…………………………………..…..……14 application by clicking: Become a Member. Portuguese Trams It has been 25 years since the OERHS departed Glenwood, yet the following story should be of interest to Imported by Gales Creek newer members because a Portuguese streetcar joined the collection at Powerland in 2006. Porto No. 210 (renumbered Enterprises (1974-1993) 201 before arrival) is not a part of the Trolley Park story, of course, but it is similar to the streetcars that were kept there. Richard Thompson Car 210 was one of a series built during 1938-45 to replace the Brill and St. Louis Car Company classics. A sense of familiarity might also come from the fact that vintage Beginning in 1974, Gales Creek Enterprises (GCE), Portuguese trams share a kinship with our beloved Council headed by Oregon Electric Railway Historical Society Crest cars 503 and 506. (OERHS) co-founder Paul Class, provided at least 70 vintage streetcars to launch trolley operations in a half-dozen American cities. In the process Paul almost single-handedly started what we now call the “heritage streetcar” movement. His company imported many streetcars from Australia and Brazil, but the largest part of that pioneering effort involved trams from Portugal.
    [Show full text]
  • BSRA 2015-03-07 Entertainment Report
    BSRA Entertainment Report for March 7, 2015 LONG FORM (for historical record) Entertainment Report for March 7, 2015 March 7, 2015. The Bachelders' NRHS Convention Adventure, Part 1. Leonard Bachelder and his wife Nancy attended the 2013 NRHS convention in Alaska, turning this into a 6-week trip through Alberta, British Columbia, Yukon Territory, and Alaska. Len started us off in Calgary, Alberta, showing us the C-Train Transit Mall. The C-Train begain operating in 1981, and has been expanded several times since. The downtown Transit Mall consists of 7th Avenue with high-level platforms that are usually offset by a block on opposite sides for space reasons. The Transit Mall is entirely within the 7th Avenue Free Fare Zone, and is shared by both C-Train routes (the South and Northwest lines, forming route 201, and Northeast and West lines, forming route 202). As Len also showed us, Calgary Transit buses use the Transit Mall, but not the station platforms. Current rolling stock types are Siemens-Duewag U2 (#2001 - #2083, delivered from 1981 through 1984, and of which 80 of the original 83 remain in service), Siemens SD-160 Series 5 and 6 (#2201 - #2272, delivered from 2001 through 2006), and Siemens SD-160NG Series 8 (#2301 - #2338, delivered in 2007). Len showed us examples of all of these classes of cars. The C-Train also has car #2090 which was made from the remaining good sections of wrecked U2 cars #2019 and #2027, and experimental cars #2101 - #2102 (AC versions of the U2s, originally #3001 - #3002) which also served as demonstrators in Edmonton, but have been retained in revenue service in Calgary (not MU-compatible with the DC motored U2s, so inserted into the middle of SD-160 trains).
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Parks and Trails Operations and Maintenance Reimbursement
    Regional Parks and Trails Operations and Maintenance Reimbursement Washington County supports the state meeting its commitment to Support reimburse 40% of the Metropolitan Regional Parks system’s operations and Park agencies that make-up the maintenance costs. Metropolitan Regional Parks system. Issue At-A-Glance • It requires an investment of more than $114 million each year from the Previous Consideration agencies to operate and maintain the regional parks system. In past sessions, the park • The state provides reimbursement to the 10 implementation agencies implementation agencies have for the costs of operating and maintaining the Metropolitan Regional requested the state provide 40% Parks system. appropriation for regional parks • Minnesota Statute (473.351) authorizes “no less than” 40% of the operations and maintenance costs to be appropriated from state funding for the operation and reimbursement. maintenance of the Metropolitan Regional Parks system. • The average annual state funding since 1986 has been 9%. No Action Activities St. Minard FAWN LAKE DR NE DALE DR N Fish ILL N W AMBASSADOR BLVD NW Bethel AVE NE If state funding is not increased, far H Francis 237TH AVE NW 237TH Sugar Hills Regional E Trail N S Martin NIGHTINGALE NW ST E U 229TH AVE NW 229TH AVE NE R N G D A D K R E R E Linwood B N E U E S T S R I H S Twp. R C T R N E RD N O K N D LA W U IS Lake George P R 221ST AVE NE A R S N O Y W N R T Regional Park U D less than the statutorily required W East 215 Martin-Island- N TH LN D N V SIMS RD NW SIMS RD NE NedsBethel
    [Show full text]