DOCSLIB.ORG

Pittsburgh Region

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pittsburgh Region PITTSBURGH REGION The Pittsburgh region has experienced both gentrification and decline since 2000, in moderate proportions. About 8 percent of regional residents live in a neighborhood with strong economic expansion, while 19 percent of residents live in a strongly declining area. The expanding areas have experienced some displacement since 2000, losing about 27 percent of their low-income population. Neighborhoods with displacement are scattered across the metro, but are particularly focused around downtown Pittsburgh, and extended northeast through the Strip District and Lower Lawrenceville. In Pittsburgh proper, black residents have suffered especially from displacement, and the black population of strongly expanding central city neigborhoods has dropped by 47 percent, or about 3,000 overall. Neighborhood decline has been moderate, both in extent and in degree. In Pittsburgh proper, a higher share of residents live in strongly declining neighborhoods than elsewhere – about 30 percent. Metrowide, the population of strongly declining areas has fallen about 11 percent since 2000, while the low-income population has increased by 16 percent, concentrating poverty. There has also been some degree of white flight, as the white population of these areas has fallen by 19 percent. Several areas are also experiencing abandonment, such as the neighborhoods of Highland Park and Morningside. Regional Total Population: 2,354,926 Regional Low-Income Population: 635,042 Regional Nonwhite Population: 327,996 Central City Population: 305,305 Central City Low-Income Population: 117,724 Central City Nonwhite Population: 108,795 NET DISPLACEMENT (Low-Income Change in Tracts with Strong Expansion, 2000-2016) Central City: -2,981 Suburbs: -9,381 NET CONCENTRATION (Low-Income Change in Tracts with Strong Decline, 2000-2016) Central City: 3,671 Suburbs: 21,660 1 DETAILS ON TABLES The following tables depict aggregated population and housing change in two categories of neighborhoods across the metropolitan area, its central cities, and its suburbs. The categories are: • Economically expanding neighborhoods, which are those experiencing the kind of population changes associated with growth and displacement. These are neighborhoods where the low-income* share of population has fallen since 2000 (indicating that an area has grown less poor overall) and the absolute number of non-low-income residents has grown since 2000 (indicating that middle-income residents see the area as an attractive place to live). • Economically declining neighborhoods, which are those experiencing the kind of population changes associated with abandonment and poverty concentration. These are neighborhoods where the low- income share of population has grown since 2000 (indicating that an area has more less poor overall) and the absolute number of non-low-income residents has fallen since 2000 (indicating that middle-income residents do not see the area as an attractive place to live). Two variants of this measure exist, and a separate table is provided for each. They are: • In the upper set of tables, a strong, narrow measure, which only includes census tracts that have a change of +/-5 percent or greater in low-income population share, and a change of +/-10 percent for non- low-income population. This approach classifies fewer neighborhoods overall, excluding areas with only small changes in their income profile. This is the more robust and preferred measure. It is also the measure used in the accompanying maps. • In the lower set of tables, a weak, broad measure, which includes all census tracts with any change that meet the criteria for the two categories above, with no cutoffs for scale. This approach classifies more neighborhoods overall, but is noisier, because it includes tracts with very small population changes. In addition, because this report relies on American Community Survey sampling data with margins of error, this measure is more likely to include erroneously classified tracts. However, this broad measure can provide a useful outer estimate of the scale of neighborhood economic expansion and decline. Three sets of tables are provided. They are: • Figures for the entire metropolitan region, aggregating central cities and suburbs into one set of tables. • Figures for central cities. • Figures for suburban areas, defined as any area in the metropolitan region not included in a central city. This includes incorporated and unincorporated communities. Each table depicts the number of people in each of the two neighborhood categories, both overall and in various population subsets. It also shows the number of housing units of various types in each neighborhood category. • 2016 Share indicates what share of the regional, city, or suburban population of a given group live in expanding or declining tracts. The box is shaded in accordance with the size of the share. • 2016 Total indicates the absolute number of individuals in a given group that live in expanding or declining census tracts. • Net Change since 2000 indicates the change of population of a subgroup in expanding or declining tracts since 2000, both in percentage and in absolute terms. These have been colored to indicate the type of change. In economically expanding tracts, green indicates net growth while blue indicates net displacement. In economically declining tracts, red indicates net poverty concentration while purple indicates net abandonment. Darker shades indicate larger percentage changes. * For the purposes of this report, “low-income” is classified as individuals at 200 percent of poverty line or less. 2 DETAILS ON MAPS Neighborhood change has also been mapped by individual census tracts, incorporating the same data used to create the tables above. The map incorporates the strong measure of neighborhood change used to create the tables. In the maps, tracts have been subdivided into four categories: • Economically expanding areas with low-income displacement, indicated in blue, where a neighborhood’s income profile is improving while low-income population declines on net. These are typically places undergoing changes traditionally associated with gentrification, in which economic pressures push out lower incomes while higher income residents arrive. • Economically expanding areas with overall growth, indicated in green, where a neighborhood’s income profile is improving while low-income population increases on net. These are typically places with significant new housing construction, where residents across the income spectrum are arriving. • Economically declining areas with abandonment, indicated in purple, where a neighborhood’s income profile is worsening while low-income population declines on net. These are typically places experiencing the worst neighborhood economic decline, with people across the income spectrum leaving and outright depopulation occurring. • Economically declining areas with poverty concentration, indicated in red, where a neighborhood’s income profile is worsening while low-income population increases on net. These are typically places where higher-income flight and eroding housing stocks are causing rapid demographic and economic transition, contributing to the impoverishment of the area. The categories are also shaded to indicate the scale of low-income population change within the census tracts. The maps allow intra-regional comparisons of observed neighborhood change. However, because these classifications have been made using American Community Survey data with margins of error, precise measures are not possible and it is likely that some individual tracts are erroneously classified. As a consequence, readers are advised to focus more on clusters of tracts undergoing similar changes rather than individual outliers, particularly outliers with smaller-scale changes. 3 TABLES FOR METROPOLITAN AREA - Pittsburgh Region ECONOMICALLY EXPANDING NEIGHBORHOODS ECONOMICALLY DECLINING NEIGHBORHOODS Population Change by Subgroup in Neighborhoods Population Change by Subgroup in Neighborhoods Experiencing Strong Economic Expansion Experiencing Strong Economic Decline (Pittsburgh Metro) (Pittsburgh Metro) 2016 Share 2016 Total Net Change Since 2000 2016 Share 2016 Total Net Change Since 2000 TOTAL 8.2% 192,715 13.0% +22,101 TOTAL 19.0% 447,242 -10.5% -52,447 Low-Income 5.3% 33,781 -26.8% -12,362 Low-Income 29.0% 183,924 16.0% +25,331 Poverty 5.1% 14,126 -18.6% -3,224 Poverty 31.9% 87,998 30.9% +20,759 Extreme Poverty 5.2% 6,381 -13.2% -972 Extreme Poverty 31.4% 38,905 26.8% +8,225 American Indian 8.6% 148 -26.7% -54 American Indian 22.9% 395 -38.6% -248 Asian 7.5% 3,732 158.8% +2,290 Asian 17.5% 8,713 77.5% +3,804 Black 4.3% 8,158 -17.6% -1,745 Black 43.3% 82,337 12.5% +9,134 Hispanic 8.1% 2,978 165.4% +1,856 Hispanic 22.3% 8,245 87.5% +3,848 White 8.6% 174,497 11.3% +17,730 White 16.4% 332,340 -18.8% -76,728 College-Educated 10.0% 54,883 92.0% +26,298 College-Educated 13.9% 76,322 16.4% +10,778 Non-College 7.4% 84,508 -8.4% -7,713 Non-College 20.7% 235,761 -15.1% -41,903 Families 8.6% 21,483 2.5% +525 Families 18.9% 47,202 -20.8% -12,379 Families in Poverty 4.7% 1,705 -30.6% -752 Families in Poverty 36.5% 13,331 29.7% +3,050 Non-Poor Families 9.3% 19,778 6.9% +1,277 Non-Poor Families 15.9% 33,871 -31.3% -15,429 Single Mothers 4.7% 1,195 -17.6% -255 Single Mothers 39.1% 9,898 30.9% +2,335 Children (Under 18) 8.5% 38,645 -2.3% -890 Children (Under 18) 19.5% 88,829 -18.0% -19,471 Young Adults (18-34) 8.0% 40,772 18.8% +6,440 Young Adults (18-34) 21.5% 109,917 1.2% +1,306 Adults
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Aw April 2013
    )HEUXDU\0DUFKZZZDOOHJKHQ\ZHVWPDJD]LQHFRP )URPWKH PUBLISHER & EDITORS 7KURXJK'LIIHUHQW(\HV My New Year’s Day started off in a rather Going into public bathrooms was often difficult. Some bathroom doors unusual fashion. I spent the morning at the are so heavy; it is next to impossible to open them with one hand while hospital having x-rays of my foot. Much to trying to navigate one’s balance and keeping two crutches under the arms. my chagrin, I learned I had broken it the night Some bathrooms for the handicapped are not equipped as they should be, before in a freak twist of my ankle. with doors in some instances opening inward (how do those with a Thus began a two-month journey of using wheelchair manage that?), or lack of paper supplies, leaving one with crutches, wearing an air boot, and staying off difficulty in maneuvering without the necessary materials to get the job my foot for what most people consider daily done. living activities, such as walking, driving, and There were other situations I discovered, too. Some public places do standing. not have ramps or flat access to their venues. Someone with a broken foot To be sure, this experience opened my eyes or leg can’t access these places. We learned that we had to carefully plot in ways I would never have considered. out our moves before we went anywhere. Getting up stairs was a challenge. Getting showered posed I am finally back on two feet and walking fine. This experience, difficulties. Getting up in the middle of the night to use the facilities however, showed me how much more we have to do to help those with meant all hands on deck, literally, while shuffling carefully to the physical handicaps.
    [Show full text]
  • Chartiers City 1977
    , An Atlas of the Chartiers City Neighborhood of Pittsburgh 1977 f CHAR TIERS CITY I UNIVERSITY CENTER fOR Un8AN RESEARCH 1209-0, Cathedral of learning UNIVERSITY Cr:: FlTiS2LJ~G H University of Pittsburgh 249 NORTH CRAIG STREET Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260 \ I'mSBURGH. PeNNSYLVANIA 15260 Phone: (412) 624-3465 PITTSBURGH NEIGHBORHOOD ATLAS GOVERNING BOARD R OGER AH L BAAN DT. JR. STAFF Univer.ity 01 P lt"bu r ~. Sc hool 01 S ocl, 1 Work Ch llrperlon JAMES VALLAS Wendell D. Jordan (East Liberty-Lemington-Lincoln) S hady. lde Vlce-Cheirper. on Margaret K. Charny (Squirrel Hill) BARBARA KELL Y Julia Whitener (Mexican War Streets) Perry-Hilltop Secretl rv Millofred Russell (Homestead, Pa.) TERRY WOODCOCK Gerald S. Oswalt (Schenley Heights) Squ lrr,. HIli T r ...ur • • Katherine Knorr (East Liberty) RICHARO ARMSTEAO John Zingaro (Shadyside) Hili OIu rlC I Dan Baskin J OSEPH BORKOWSKI Lawarancavllla Vicky Leap O A NIEL CHAPPELL Howard Williams Hili OIltrlet Ronald ~adzy MARY CO YNE West End Tony Gary JIM CUNNINGHAM Mary Shea Shady.lda MARY LOU DANIEL West End SUPPORTIVE INSTITUTIONS J ESE OEL GRE Hili Olurlet WILLIAM P. GALLAGHER Pittsburgh Neighborhood Alliance G reenflald Center for Urban Research of the Univ. 'of Pgh. MARY HALL Squ lr ..1 HIli School of Social Work of the Univ. of Pgh. ROSE JEWELL Architect Workshop Shady,lde City Council of the City of Pgh. GABOR KISH Elliott Allegheny County Department of Elections ROBERT "BLUE" MARTIN Haulwood ACTION-Housing. Inc. TH O MAS MURPHY Department of City Planning of the City of Pgh. " a rry Hilltop Southwestern Penna.
    [Show full text]
  • Anatomy of a Neighborhood: Homewood in the 21St Century, 2011
    ANATOMY OF A NEIGHBORHOOD: HOMEWOOD IN THE 21ST CENTURY March 2011 Project in support of the Homewood Children’s Village report: State of the Village, 2011 Program in Urban and Regional Analysis University Center for Social and Urban Research University of Pittsburgh 121 University Place Pittsburgh, PA 15260 Homewood Children’s Village University of Pittsburgh School of Social Work Center on Race and Social Problems Executive Summary The Urban and Regional Analysis program at the University Center for Social and Urban Research (UCSUR) has been engaged in a number of projects involving Pittsburgh neighborhoods, with its Pittsburgh Neighborhood and Community Information System (PNCIS) serving as a valuable resource for these projects. Homewood is a neighborhood in Pittsburgh’s East End that has experienced tremendous change since the 1940s, as suburbanization, population loss and post-industrial restructuring of the Pittsburgh region have deeply affected this community. This report summarizes collaboration between UCSUR and the Homewood Children’s Village in 2010. Information from this study will also be part of the Homewood Children’s Village State of the Village (2011).1 Some prominent changes and trends analyzed in this report include: Homewood continues to lose population. Between 2000 and 2010, Homewood’s population dropped 30.6 percent, to 6,600 residents. In Homewood South and Homewood West, residents aged 65 and over make up nearly a third of the population. The average sales price for existing residential homes in Homewood was $9,060 in 2009, one-tenth the average price for a home in the City of Pittsburgh. This 2009 price represents a substantial loss of home equity from twenty years earlier, when the average home sold for over $22,000 in current (2010) dollars.
    [Show full text]
  • Allegheny County Community Learning Hubs Safe Places for Kids to Go to Do Schoolwork and Participate in Enrichment Activities During COVID-19
    Allegheny County Community Learning Hubs Safe places for kids to go to do schoolwork and participate in enrichment activities during COVID-19. Why a learning hub? • Children will be grouped in pods of 10 or fewer and will spend the entire day Learning hubs are a great option for parents who need childcare when in-person with that pod school is not in session. Learning hub staff will help facilitate the virtual curriculum • Adequate spaces, desk and chairs are available to maintain physical distancing from your child’s school district in the morning and conduct fun activities with them in the afternoon. • Children must wear their own mask at all times, except when eating or drinking Locations What is a day like at a learning hub? There are more than 50 learning hubs in Allegheny County. Most locations are Most learning hubs are open all day on weekdays (check with the hub you are open Monday through Friday during normal school hours. Contact a hub near you interested in for exact times). Free Wi-Fi is available, but your child should bring to enroll and to find out more. their own technology device (laptop computer, tablet, phone). Each child will get headphones for online work. Eligibility Every learning hub has free spots available for low-income families, with priority Staff will help children in the following ways: for families experiencing homelessness, families involved in child welfare or other • Help children get online each morning and keep them motivated to engage human services and children of essential workers. Some learning hub locations virtually offer flexibility with payment including private pay, subsidies and free options.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Services Activist Richard Garland Brings “Juice” to a New Program That Puts Ex-Cons on the Street to Stop Brutal Violence Before Lives Are Lost
    Social services activist Richard Garland brings “juice” to a new program that puts ex-cons on the street to stop brutal violence before lives are lost. By Jim Davidson Photography by Steve Mellon Adrienne Young offers a cherished image of her son, Javon, gunned down a decade ago in the last epidemic of street violence involving youth in Pittsburgh. Young went on to found Tree of Hope, a faith-based agency that serves families and children devastated by senseless killings. 13 The story is familiar now. A dispute over turf, money, girls, pride or next to nothing is replayed again and again on the streets of Pittsburgh — streets now marked with the ferocity, the violence, the tragedy that can bring down a neighborhood when young people have guns. ❖ Adrienne Young knows about it all too well. On a night just before Christmas 10 years ago, her 18-year-old son, Javon Thompson, an artist who had just finished his first semester at Carnegie Mellon University, was visiting a friend’s apartment in East Liberty. “He was successful. He had never done anything to anyone. He was an artist and writer — he was a great child,” Young says now. That night, Benjamin Wright, a robber dressed in gang colors, burst into the apartment and icily ordered Thompson to “say his last words.” Gunshots rang out, killing Thompson and wounding two others. Wright, who later confessed that he shot Thompson and robbed him for failing to show proper respect to his Bloods street gang, is serving a life sentence. ❖ But the carnage from the violence extends well beyond the victims and the shooter.
    [Show full text]
  • Hays Woods Task Force Report - Draft for Discussion Hays Woods Task Force Report - Draft for Discussion 3 Table of Contents Letter from Task Force Co-Chairs
    Hays Woods Task Force DRAFT Findings and Recommendations to Mayor William Peduto and the Pittsburgh City Council MARCH 2019 DRAFT ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Mayor William Peduto Dave Depretis, Baldwin Borough, Mayor Sylvia Fields, Eden Hall Foundation Mike Gable, Department of Public Works Co-Chairs of the Hays Woods Task Force Ray Gastil, Department of City Planning Corey O’Connor, Councilman, District 5, City of Pittsburgh Hannah Hardy, Allegheny County Health Department Tom Murphy, Urban Land Institute Ryan Herbinko, 31st Ward Community Action Group, Lincoln Place resident Michael Knoop, Western Pennsylvania Conservancy Office of Councilman Corey O’Connor Sarah Koenig, Audubon Society of Western Pennsylvania Curt Conrad, Chief of Staff Roy Kraynyk, Allegheny Land Trust Erin Jensen, Operations Intern Joey Lynn Ulrich, Venture Outdoors Ilyssa Manspeizer, Landforce Department of City Planning Peg McCormack, Riverlife Ray Gastil, Planning Director Jayne Miller, Pittsburgh Parks Conservancy Andrew Dash, Assistant Director Camila Rivera Tinsley, Pittsburgh Parks Conservancy Kara Smith, Principal Environmental Planner Heather Sage, Pittsburgh Parks Conservancy Martina Battistone, Senior Environmental Planner Kate St. John, Friends of Hays Woods Ose Akinlotan, Neighborhood Planner Sonya Tilghman, Hazelwood Initiative Mike Walsh, Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Task Force Members Karen Abrams, Heinz Endowments John Barret, Baldwin Borough Patrick Bondi, Baldwin Borough Shade Tree Commission Jacqui Bonomo, PennFuture Lisa Brown, Economic
    [Show full text]
  • City of Pittsburgh Neighborhood Profiles Census 2010 Summary File 1 (Sf1) Data
    CITY OF PITTSBURGH NEIGHBORHOOD PROFILES CENSUS 2010 SUMMARY FILE 1 (SF1) DATA PROGRAM IN URBAN AND REGIONAL ANALYSIS UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR SOCIAL AND URBAN RESEARCH UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH JULY 2011 www.ucsur.pitt.edu About the University Center for Social and Urban Research (UCSUR) The University Center for Social and Urban Research (UCSUR) was established in 1972 to serve as a resource for researchers and educators interested in the basic and applied social and behavioral sciences. As a hub for interdisciplinary research and collaboration, UCSUR promotes a research agenda focused on the social, economic and health issues most relevant to our society. UCSUR maintains a permanent research infrastructure available to faculty and the community with the capacity to: (1) conduct all types of survey research, including complex web surveys; (2) carry out regional econometric modeling; (3) analyze qualitative data using state‐of‐the‐art computer methods, including web‐based studies; (4) obtain, format, and analyze spatial data; (5) acquire, manage, and analyze large secondary and administrative data sets including Census data; and (6) design and carry out descriptive, evaluation, and intervention studies. UCSUR plays a critical role in the development of new research projects through consultation with faculty investigators. The long‐term goals of UCSUR fall into three broad domains: (1) provide state‐of‐the‐art research and support services for investigators interested in interdisciplinary research in the behavioral, social, and clinical sciences; (2) develop nationally recognized research programs within the Center in a few selected areas; and (3) support the teaching mission of the University through graduate student, post‐ doctoral, and junior faculty mentoring, teaching courses on research methods in the social sciences, and providing research internships to undergraduate and graduate students.
    [Show full text]
  • Of the School District of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Minutes
    THE BOARD OF PUBLIC EDUCATION OF THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA MINUTES Meeting of: August 25,2004 Call of the Meeting: Regular Meeting Members Present: Mr. Brentley, Mrs. Colaizzi, Dr. Dowd, Mrs. Fink, Mr. Isler, Mr. Matthews, Mr. McCrea, Mr. Romaniello, Sr., and Mr. Taylor Present 9. Members Absent: Absent 0. The following matters were received and acted upon. Actions taken are recorded following the reports. THE BOARD OF PUBLIC EDUCATION PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA 15213 Administration Building 341 South Bellefieid Avenue August 25,2004 AGENDA ROLL CALL Approval of the Minutes of the Meeting of July 21,2004 Announcement of Executive Sessions Committee Reports 1. Committee on Education Roll Call 2. Committee on BusinessEinance Roll Call Personnel Report 3. Personnel Report of the Superintendent of Schools Roll Call Financial Matters Financial Statement and Controller's Reports on the Status of Appropriations New Business Roll Call(s) We are an equal rights and opportunity school district. EXECUTIVE SESSIONS Legislative Meeting of August 25, 2004 In addition to executive sessions announced at the legislative meeting of July 21 2004, the Board met in executive session on July 27, August 16, and immediately before this legislative meeting to discuss various personnel matters, that may include, but are not limited to: administrative vacancies, residency waivers, disciplinary matters, and positions opened and closed. The Board does not vote at executive sessions. Committee on Education August 25,2004 Page 1 COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION AUGUST 25,2004 DIRECTORS: The Committee on Student Services recommends the adoption of the following resolutions, that the proper officers of the Board be authorized to enter into contracts relating to those resolutions and that authority be given to the staff to change account numbers, the periods of performance, and such other details as may be necessary to carry out the intent of the resolution, so long as the total amount of money carried in the resolution is not exceeded.
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvania
    DRAFT CITY OF PITTSBURGH P ENNSYLVANIA JURISDICTION: City of Pittsburgh NEIGHBORHOOD MAYOR: Luke Ravenstahl STABILIZATION JURISDICTION WEB ADDRESS: PROGRAM http://www.city.pittsburgh.pa.us/ SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT NSP CONTACT PERSON: Ms. Susan Scheuring ADDRESS: For Submission to HUD 200 Ross Street, 2nd Floor Pittsburgh, PA 15219 December 1, 2008 TELEPHONE NUMBER: (412) 255-2667 FAX NUMBER: (412) 393-0151 EMAIL ADDRESS: [email protected] City of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROGRAM (NSP) CITY OF PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA TABLE OF CONTENTS A. Table of Contents…………...…………...…………...…..……………….…………..1 B. SF 424 Form…………………………………………………………………………….2 C. Executive Summary…………………………………………………………………...3 D. Areas of Greatest Need…………………………...……………………………….....4 E. Distribution and Uses of Funds……………………………………………………20 F. Definitions and Descriptions……………….………………………………………25 G. Low Income Targeting………………………………………………………………28 H. Acquisitions and Relocation……………………………………………………….29 I. Public Comment Period…………………………………………………………….30 J. Information By Activity………………………..…………………………………….32 K. Total Budget…………………………………………………………………………..41 L. Performance Measures……………………………………………………………...42 M. Certifications………………………….………………………………………………43 Neighborhood Stabilization Program 1 FY 2008 City of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania B. HUD SF 424 FORM: 1. HUD SF 424 Form – Attached is the Standard Form – 424, as required by HUD, in support of the City of Pittsburgh’s Neighborhood Stabilization Program Application. Neighborhood Stabilization Program
    [Show full text]
  • PHLF News Publication
    Pittsburgh History & Landmarks Foundation 1 Station Square, Suite 450 Pittsburgh, P 15219 -1134 www.phlf.org^ Address Service Requested Punusnno FoR THE MEMBERS oF THE PrrrseuRcH HISToRy s{ LANDMARKS FouNDATToN No. 150 August 1"998 Landmarks Assists Manchester and South Side in Obtaining $S Million Commirmenr Duquesne Light and Pl{C Bank, major corpora,te sponsors, utilize State tax-credit program to assist Pittsburgh neighborhoods In, this issue: TVfe are pleased to inform 5 W ou, -embe.s of major The Courthouse: grants to the South Side A Progress Local Development Report Company (SSLDC)and Manchester Citizens 10 (MCC), Corporation two Pittsburgh-and neighborhood organizations with whom we have worked Landmarks-Inspire f.or many years. As a result Main Street Participants of our technical assistance and their excellent proposals, Duquesne Light and PNC 20 Bank will provide Manchester Passing the Torch: Arensberg, t: and South Side, respectivel¡ Van Dusen, Hallen with funding commitments for ten years under the È Commonwealth of Pennsyl- vania's Department of Community and Economic Development Neighborhood Our Partners Comment PNC Bank is excited about thß iruestment oppor- Assistance Program/ Comprehensive tuníty. Tlrc strength of the partrærs-South Síd,e From lcft to rþht : Howard B. Slau4hter, Gouemor Rid,ge ß excited, about the role that the Service Program. Incal Deuelopment Company, the Pittsburgh Jr., director of P reseruation Seraices Neighborhood, Assistanc,e Program,/ Samuel A. McCullough, secretary Hßtory & lrtnd,marks Found,arion, and, Brashear Comprehensiue Senice Program nill play in our of the Department of Community and a,t Landmørlts; Mayor Tom Murphy; Association-in terms of their operating perfor- ongoing eforts to reaitalize the communiries in Economic Development (DCED), Sy Holzer, president of PNC Banh; mance and, historíc d,ed,ícation to improuing the the Píttsburgh regíon.
    [Show full text]
  • Now Offering Sports Physicals!
    Now offering sports physicals! Check https://www.chp.edu/our-services/mobile-medical-clinic/schedule for the most up-to-date locations and dates this summer! All clinics run from 10AM – 2PM Neighborhood Location Dates Braddock Braddock Civic Plaza June 24th 451 Braddock Ave, Braddock, PA 15104 July 22nd Chartiers Chartiers Early Childhood Center June 8th 3799 Chartiers Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15204 June 10th Clairton Family Dollar June 4th 533 Miller Ave, Clairton, PA 15025 Coraopolis Cornell School District August 31st 1099 Maple St, Coraopolis, PA 15108 Crafton/West End The First United Presbyterian Church of June 29th Crafton Heights July 17th 50 Stratmore Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15205 Hazelwood Old S&R Market Lot July 8th 4915 Second Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15207 Hill District Ebenezer Baptist Church July 6th 2001 Wylie Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15219 August 12th Homestead/Munhall Steel Valley Middle School July 27th 3114 Main St, Munhall, PA 15120 July 29th Homewood Homewood-Brushton YMCA June 25th 7140 Bennett St, Pittsburgh, PA 15208 July 23rd Mt. Oliver Hilltop Family Care Connection July 10th 1635 Arlington Ave, Mount Oliver, PA 15210 Natrona Heights Allegheny Valley YMCA July 2nd 5021 Freeport Rd, Natrona Heights, PA August 6th 15065 New Castle New Castle Jr/Sr High School July 20th 300 E Lincoln Ave, New Castle, PA 16101 August 19th New Kensington Valley Points Family YMCA June 22nd 800 Constitution Blvd, New Kensington, July 16th PA 15068 North Side Children’s Museum of Pittsburgh June 17th 10 Children’s Way, Pittsburgh, PA 15212 July 15th The Pittsburgh Project July 24th 2801 N Charles St, Pittsburgh, PA 15214 August 5th Penn Hills Penn Hills Family Care Connection June 18th 10 Duff Rd, Penn Hills, PA 15235 July 31st Wilkinsburg Wilkinsburg School District June 19th 718 Wallace Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15221 July 13th Children’s Hospital Injury Prevention will be on site at this location and date distributing free bike helmets.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Pittsburgh, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania Planning Sector 4: West Pittsburgh West End & Elliott Neighborhoods Report of Findings and Recommendations
    Architectural Inventory for the City of Pittsburgh, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania Planning Sector 4: West Pittsburgh West End & Elliott Neighborhoods Report of Findings and Recommendations The City of Pittsburgh In Cooperation With: Pennsylvania Historical & Museum Commission September 2018 Paving Chartiers Avenue in Elliott, April 28, 1910, view northwest from Lorenz Avenue. Pittsburgh City Photographer’s Collection, Archives of Industrial Society, University of Pittsburgh Prepared By: Michael Baker International, Inc. Jesse A. Belfast Justin Greenawalt and Clio Consulting Angelique Bamberg with Cosmos Technologies, Inc. James Brown The Architectural Inventory for the City of Pittsburgh, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, was made possible with funding provided by the Pennsylvania State Historic Preservation Office (PA SHPO), the City of Pittsburgh, and the U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Certified Local Government program. The contents and opinions contained in this document do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior. This program receives federal financial assistance for identification and protection of historic properties. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, the U.S. Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, disability, or age in its federally assisted programs. If you believe you have been discriminated against
    [Show full text]