OBJ (Application/Pdf)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

OBJ (Application/Pdf) i7961 ~ar vio~aoao ‘va~triiv ioo’IoIa ~o Vc!~ ~tVITII~ MOflt~W ~IVJs~OO ~31~E~IO~ ~O ~J~V1AI dTO ~O~K~t ~HJ, ~!O~ ~ ~ ~o j~N~rniflflA ‘wIJ~vc! MI ISH~KAIMf1 VJ~t~tWI1V ~O Nh1flDY~ ~H~Ii OJ~ iwan~ ~I~H~L V IOMEM ~nO~oV~IHawIo ~IO V~T~N~fJ !‘O s~aictn~ ~ tt 017 ‘. ~I~LIO aUfl1V~EJ~I’I ...•...•...••• .c.~IVWJT~flS A ii: ••••••••~•‘••••‘‘ MOIS~flO~I~ ~INY sMoI~vA~asaO A1 9 ~ ~OH ~t1~W VI~~1Th 111 . ‘ . ~ ~o ~tIA~U • II t ••••••••••••• ..•.•s•e•e•••q••••• NoI~OfltO~~LNI i At •••••••••••••••••••••••••~••••••••••• ~Unott~ ~ao ~~i’i ttt ...........................~!aV1 ~O J~SI’I gJ~N~J~NOO ~O ~‘I~VJi ttt 91 ‘‘~~‘ ~ ~flOQO t~.8tO .XU03 JO ~tU~OJ Ot~o!ot~&OW ~ue~t~ jo ~o~-~X~dWOO peq.~~uc~~1 j 9 tq~ a ri~i~ ~o ~r~r’r LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Photograph of sporophore of C1ath~ fisoberi.... 12 2. Photograph of sporophore of Colus hirudinOsUs ... 12 3. Photograph of sporophore of Colonnarià o olumnata. • • • • • • • • • • . • , • • . • . 20 4. “Latern&t glebal position of Colozinarla ......... 23 5. Photograph of sporophore of Pseudooo~ ~~y~nicuS ~ 29 6. Photograph of transect ions of It~gg~tt of pseudooo1~ javanious showing three arms ........ 34 7. PhotographS of transactions of Itegg&t of Pseudocolus javanicUs showing four arms ......... 34 8. Basidia and basidiospOres of Pseudoco].uS j aVafliCUs . 35 iv CHAPTER I INTRODU~flON Several collections of a elath~aceous fungus were made during the summer of 1963 in a wooded area off Boulder Park Drive just outside the city limits of Atlanta, Georgia. Attempts to identify the fungus revealed the existence of confusion regarding the taxo— nomic position of certain clathraceous genera. After a more critical survey of the literature, it was evident that diverse opinions prevail relative to the nomenclatorial status of certain generic names and taxonomic delimitations of these genera. The olathraoeous fungi belong to the class Basidiomycetes, the subclass Homobasidiomycetes, the order Phallales, and the family Clathraoeae. Opinions vary concerning the recognition of orders in the Homobasidiomycetes and this affects the number of families recognized. The order Phallales, however, and the fami lies Phallaoeae and Clathraoeae are recognized by most mycologists. Fungi belonging to Phallales are commonly loiown as phalloids, so called beóause of the excessively fetid odor of the exposed gleba present on a horn—like receptaöJ.e. The term “pha].loid”, however, has a more valid reference to the family Phallaoeae, to which Phallus belongs and upon which the family was established. The family Olathraceae, on the other hand, is based on the genus Clathrus and those related stinkhorns that have a receptacle composed of obliquely anastomosing branches or a columnar recep— taclo. The lattice—work pattern of branching is more character istic of the group. This pattern may be confined to an apical 2 position or it may be completely lacking, with the receptacle consisting of simple vertical branches. ~Unoertainty regarding generic limits and status prevail espeoiàlly among those clathraceous members with the receptacle consisting of columnar branches. The problem still appears to be unresolved although several studies of fresh and preserved collec tions of clathraceous fungi assigned to different genera are reported. in the literature. When an attempt was made to identify the locally collected specimens, five generic names were encoun tered. These included Colonnaria, Colus, Clathrus, Latornea aM Pseudocolus. Three of these genera, Laternea, Colonnaria and. Pseudocolus, were clearly based on the presence of columnar receptacles, and two, Colus and Clathrus, were based on a partial or full lattice—work receptacle pattern. Since it was found that the status of Colus and Clathrus required no further clarification, it became the objective of these studies to attempt to clarify the status and relationship of the remaining three genera, namely, Colonnaria, Laternea and Pseudooolus. The principal delimiting features of the genera were found to involve variations in global position, the morphology of the receptacle, and the presence or absence of a stipe. The approach used in an attempt to resolve this problem was to criti cally study and evaluate the morphologic characteristics possessed by specimens assigned to these genera, in order to ascertain the limits of generic boundaries and the extent of species differences within these taxa. CHAPTER II REVIEW OF LITERATURE Traditionally the clathraoeous fungi have been pl~cod in the Gasteromycetes, a subdivision of the subclass Homobasidiomycetes. Today, the term Gasterornyoetes is not generally recognized as a taxonomic category. Martin (1961) has included Gasteromycetes as one of the two earlier series of the Homobasidiomycetes. At one time, all fungi in this series were grouped into the single order, Lycoperdales. Fischer (1890) recognized the order Lycoperdales and included as one of the families was Phallaoeae, the taxon to which the genera Colus and Clathrus were assigned. Excluding Colus, he placed all columnar olathraoeous fungi in the genus Clathrus. C]~ents and Shear (1931) followed Fischer’s treatment of the clathraceous fungi in their volume on known genera of fungi. In the earlier work of Fries (1823), the Gasteromycetes were recognized as a valid class. He included in this class, the order Angiogastres and the suborder Phalloideae, to which four genera were assigned. Clathrus was among the included genera, Laternea. being listed under it as a tribe. Saccardo (1888) elevated Phalloideae to family status and designated Clathreae and Phalleas as subfamilies. The exact status of Laternea and Pseudocolus was not indicated. In Coker and Couches (1928) study of the Gasteromycetes, the family Phallaceae, with subfamilies Clathreae and Phalleae, was recognized. Genera included in Clathreae were Clathrus and Colus; 3 4 Pseudocolus was only mentioned as a generic name and no further comment was made. Fischer (1933) established Phallineae as a suborder and Clathraoeae, including Clathrus and related forms, and Phallaoeae, including Phallus and related forms, as subfamilies. Among the genera of Clathraceae recognized were Colonnaria, Laternea and Psoudocolus. •Zeller (1949) published keys to the Gasteromycetes based on Fischer’s treatment. Differences extend beyond these categories .to the genera. In Glathraceae, the morphology of the receptacle, variation in the gleba in relation to the receptacle, and the presence or absence of a. stipe represent the features providing the taxonomic bases for generic delimitations. The genus Clathrus established by Micheli (1729) was described as having a receptaole without a single distinct branch, forming an inflated hollow network. Colus, erected by Cavalier and Sechier (1835), was indicated as having 6 to 9 vertical branches of equal length, attached to an apical dome—shape lattice—work, to which the gleba adhered. Clathraceous fungi with simple columns joined at the apex said free at the base have been placed in various taxa. Colonnaria, a genus erected by Rafinesque (i808), was described as having a receptacle divided “into four pillars united at the top which bear the seeds in the margin”, Turpin (1822), apparently unaware of Rafinesque’s Colonnaria, described the genus Laternea. The genus Laternea was described as having a receptacle consisting of slender, 5 smooth columns united at the apex with the gleba restricted to this apical region. Linder (1928), in his treatment of clathraceous genera, recognized the validity of Laternea. This genus was not recognized by Fischer (1890) in an earlier treatment, for ho incor porated all columnar clathraceous fungi, except Colus, in the genus Clathrus. It was further suggested by Linder (1928), that Colonnaria, on the basis of priority, be recognized and include those clathraoeous fungi with simple columnar receptacles having no hhlaternett gleba. Linder suggested that Clathrus be reserved for those forms having aaaastomosed receptacles. Cunningham (1931) separated the columnar species, previously included in Clathrus by Fischer (1890), and established for them the genus Linderia, differing from Laternea in having its globa on the inner surface of the arms rather than in the etlaternett position. Linderia was later changed by Cunningham (1942) to Linderiella, since the name Linderia was similar in appearance to Lindera Thunberg, a member of Lauraceae. Cunningham indicated that investigators recognizing Colonnaria were operating on mere guess work in assuming that Rafinesque was dealing with a. fungus. Lloyd (1907) described Rafinescjue’s report of a new fungus as being “Rafinesque raving”. The opinions of both Lloyd and Cunningham were shared by Long and Stouffer (1948), who rejeoted Fischer’s later treatment (1933) of Colonnaria and Laternea. According to Santesson (1943), the rejection of Rafinesque’s description of Colonnaria cannot be accepted in light of the present rules of nomenclature. Santesson expressed the opinion 6 that because of the wording of the description, the only fungus to which such a description could apply would be to a olathraceoUs fuiagus. Santesson therefore made Linderia a synonym of 001 onnaria. In 1933 Fischer recognized the genera Laternea and Coloimaria, and indicated the thain difference delimiting these genera as being ?tfistutous columns” and “massive columns” respectively. Santessofl (1943) reported that the receptacle of Colorinaria was not “massive” but was “lacunose”; the arms of La,ternea were not “fistutoUs” but were ~~lacunosett. Th~.s differing with the work of Fischer, he further indicated only a difference in the size of the cavities in the lacunose tissue, a difference deemed insufficient to warrant separation of the genera. Santesson considered Laternea to be a synonym of Colonnaria, recognizing the latter as the valid genus. Linder (1928) indicated that the “laterne” gleba]. position was common to Laternea. For his studies, he only had comparative material preserved in alcohol of Clathrus columna.tus, and therefore the gleba was misinterpreted, according to Santesson (1943), who did a detailed study of Clathrus co1ur~.atu~ and compared this to Linder’s photographs of Laternea triscapa.
Recommended publications
  • Stinkhorns of the Ns of the Hawaiian Isl Aiian Isl Aiian Islands
    StinkhorStinkhornsns ofof thethe HawHawaiianaiian IslIslandsands Don E. Hemmes1* and Dennis E. Desjardin2 Abstract: Additional members of the Phallales are recorded from the Hawaiian Islands. Aseroë arachnoidea, Phallus atrovolvatus, and a Protubera sp. have been collected since the publication of the field guide Mushrooms of Hawaii in 2002. A complete list of species and their distribution on the various islands is included. Figure 1. Aseroë rubra is commonly encountered in Eucalyptus plantations Key Words: Phallales, Aseroë, Phallus, Mutinus, Dictyophora, in Hawai’i but these fruiting bodies are growing in wood chip mulch surrounding landscape plants in a park. Pseudocolus, Protubera, Hawaii. Roger Goos made the earliest comprehensive record of mem- bers of the Phallales in the Hawaiian Islands (Goos, 1970) and listed Anthurus javanicus (Penzig.) G. Cunn., Aseroë rubra Labill.: Fr., Dictyophora indusiata (Vent.: Pers.) Desv., Linderiella columnata (Bosc) G. Cunn., and Phallus rubicundus (Bosc) Fr. Later, Goos, along with Dring and Meeker, described the unique Clathrus spe- cies, C. oahuensis Dring (Dring et al., 1971) from the Koko Head Desert Botanical Gardens on Oahu. The records of Dictyophora indusiata and Linderiella columnata in Goos’s paper actually came from observations by N. A. Cobb in the early 1900’s (Cobb, 1906; Cobb, 1909) who reported these two species in sugar cane fields on Hawai’i Island (also known as the Big Island) and Kaua’i, re- spectively, and thought they might be parasitic on sugar cane. To our knowledge, neither Linderiella columnata (now known as Figure 2. Aseroë arachnoidea forming fairy rings on a lawn in Hilo. Clathrus columnatus Bosc) nor Clathrus oahuensis has been seen in the islands since these early observations.
    [Show full text]
  • <I>Clathrus Delicatus</I>
    ISSN (print) 0093-4666 © 2010. Mycotaxon, Ltd. ISSN (online) 2154-8889 MYCOTAXON doi: 10.5248/114.319 Volume 114, pp. 319–328 October–December 2010 Development and morphology of Clathrus delicatus (Phallomycetidae, Phallaceae) from India S. Swapna1, S. Abrar1, C. Manoharachary2 & M. Krishnappa1* [email protected], [email protected] cmchary@rediffmail.com & *[email protected] 1Department of Post Graduate Studies and Research in Applied Botany Jnana Sahyadri, Kuvempu University, Shankaraghatta-577451, Karnataka, India 2Mycology and Plant Pathology Laboratory, Department of Botany Osmania University, Hyderabad-500007, Andhra Pradesh, India Abstract — During fieldwork, Clathrus delicatus was collected from the Muthodi forest range in the Bhadra Wildlife Sanctuary in the state of Karnataka, India. Although this species was previously recorded from India, these reports did not include detailed morphological descriptions. Here we describe C. delicatus and provide illustrations and notes on fruitbody development, which has not been well characterized in the past. Key words — Phallaceae, peridial suture, primordia, sporoma, volva-gel Introduction Members of Phallales, commonly called stinkhorns, produce foul-smelling fruitbodies that attract insects. Their distinctive odor is produced by a combination of chemicals such as hydrogen sulfide and methyl mercaptan (List & Freund 1968). Stinkhorns typically develop very quickly, often within few hours, with the spore bearing structures (receptacles) emerging from globose to ovoid structures called ‘myco-eggs’ (Lloyd 1906, Pegler et al. 1995). The order Phallales comprises 2 families, 26 genera, and 88 species (Kirk et al. 2008). Clathroid members of family Phallaceae form multipileate receptacles (Gäumann 1952) with beautiful and bright colored sporomata. Clathrus is unique in having latticed, hollow, spherical or stellate receptacles with slimy glebae (spore masses) borne on their inner surfaces (Pegler et al.
    [Show full text]
  • AR TICLE Phylogenetic Placement of Itajahya
    IMA FUNGUS · 6(2): 257–262 (2015) doi:10.5598/imafungus.2015.06.02.01 Phylogenetic placement of Itajahya: An unusual Jacaranda fungal associate ARTICLE Seonju Marincowitz2, Martin P.A. Coetzee1,2, P. Markus Wilken1,2, Brenda D. Wingeld1,2, and Michael J. Wingeld2 1Department of Genetics, Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), University of Pretoria, P.O. Box X20, Pretoria, 0028, South Africa 2Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), University of Pretoria, P.O. Box X20, Pretoria, 0028, South Africa; corresponding author e-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Itajahya is a member of Phallales (Agaricomycetes), which, based on the presence of a calyptra Key words: and DNA sequence data for I. rosea, has recently been raised to generic status from a subgenus of Homobasidiomycetes Phallus. The type species of the genus, I. galericulata, is commonly known as the Jacaranda stinkhorn molecular phylogeny in Pretoria, South Africa, which is the only area where the fungus is known outside the Americas. The Phallomycetidae common name is derived from its association with the South American originating Jacaranda mimosifolia phalloid fungi trees in the city. The aim of this study was to consider the unusual occurrence of the fungus in South South Africa Africa, to place it on the available Phallales phylogeny and to test whether it merits generic status. Fresh stinkhorns basidiomes were collected during the summer of 2015 and sequenced. Phylogenetic analyses were based on sequence data for the nuc-LSU-rDNA (LSU) and ATPase subunit 6 (ATP6) regions. The results showed that I. rosea and I. galericulata are phylogenetically related.
    [Show full text]
  • (Basidiomycota, Phallales) in India
    © 2018 W. Szafer Institute of Botany Polish Academy of Sciences Plant and Fungal Systematics 63(2): 39–44, 2018 ISSN 2544-7459 (print) DOI: 10.2478/pfs-2018-0006 Morphological and molecular evidence for the occurrence of Itajahya galericulata (Basidiomycota, Phallales) in India Ravi S. Patel, Ajit M. Vasava & Kishore S. Rajput* Abstract. Itajahya galericulata (Phallales, Phallaceae) was previously reported from Article info several countries in South America and Africa. Recently we found I. galericulata in the Received: 2 May 2018 city of Vadodara, Gujarat State, India. To verify its identity we studied its morphology and Revision received: 21 Nov. 2018 performed molecular phylogenetic analyses using nuclear rDNA LSU and mitochondrial Accepted: 22 Nov. 2018 ATP6 loci. Here we also provide nuclear rDNA ITS sequences for the Indian collection, Published: 14 Dec. 2018 since up to now no sequences of this region have been available for I. galericulata in Corresponding Editor GenBank. This study furnishes the first evidence for the occurrence of I. galericulata in Marcin Piątek India and in Asia as a whole. Key words: Itajahya, Phallaceae, ITS, molecular phylogeny, DNA barcoding, India, Asia Introduction Members of the fungal family Phallaceae, classified a poorly known yet taxonomically important member of within the order Phallales and subphylum Basidiomycota, the genus – Itajahya galericulata – and concluded that are commonly known as stinkhorn mushrooms. The fam- it is phylogenetically separated from species of Phallus ily contains 21 genera and 77 species (Kirk et al. 2008), and Dictyophora. Their study also confirmed that Ita- including the genus Itajahya, which was first described jahya rosea and I.
    [Show full text]
  • Barbed Wire Vine
    Flora & Fauna of Mt Gravatt Conservation Reserve – Fungi Compiled by: Michael Fox http://megoutlook.wordpress.com/flora-fauna/ © 2014-17 Creative Commons – free use with attribution to Mt Gravatt Environment Group Gilled Fungi Basidiomycota Armillaria luteobubalina Common in sclerophyll forests – very active parasite spreading underground from infected trees by dark string like rhizomorphs Basidiomycota Russula persanguinea Simple Gills Fleshy texture Mycorrhizal species (symbiotic with plant roots) found in eucalypt forests. Fungi - ver 1.1 Page 1 of 24 Flora & Fauna of Mt Gravatt Conservation Reserve – Fungi Basidiomycota Mycena lampadis Luminous Mushroom Bioluminescencet Basidiomycota Mushroom orange Gilled Fungi - ver 1.1 Page 2 of 24 Flora & Fauna of Mt Gravatt Conservation Reserve – Fungi Basidiomycota Mushroom white-brown Gilled Basidiomycota Mushroom – white-pink/grey Fungi - ver 1.1 Page 3 of 24 Flora & Fauna of Mt Gravatt Conservation Reserve – Fungi Basidiomycota Mushroom – white-brown patchy Gilled Fungi - ver 1.1 Page 4 of 24 Flora & Fauna of Mt Gravatt Conservation Reserve – Fungi Basidiomycota Mushroom – brown Gilled Fungi - ver 1.1 Page 5 of 24 Flora & Fauna of Mt Gravatt Conservation Reserve – Fungi Basidiomycota Mushroom – orange/brown Gilled Fungi - ver 1.1 Page 6 of 24 Flora & Fauna of Mt Gravatt Conservation Reserve – Fungi Basidiomycota Bracket – white Gilled Basidiomycota Funnel – white Gilled Fungi - ver 1.1 Page 7 of 24 Flora & Fauna of Mt Gravatt Conservation Reserve – Fungi Coral Fungi Basidiomycota Coral White Fungi - ver 1.1 Page 8 of 24 Flora & Fauna of Mt Gravatt Conservation Reserve – Fungi Gilled Fungi – Simple Gills Basidiomycota Mycena sp Simple Gills Basidiomycota Mushroom grey-white Simple Gills Fungi - ver 1.1 Page 9 of 24 Flora & Fauna of Mt Gravatt Conservation Reserve – Fungi Basidiomycota Mushroom red Simple Gills Basidiomycota Mushroom purple Simple Gills Tiny purple mushrooms growing through a Craypot fungi.
    [Show full text]
  • Una Nueva Especie De Clathrus (Eumycota, Phallales)1
    BOLETIN DE LA SOCIEDAD ARG'ENTINA DE BOTANICA 24 (1-2): 131-136, Julio, 1985 UNA NUEVA ESPECIE DE CLATHRUS (EUMYCOTA, PHALLALES)1 Por LAURA S. DOMINGUEZ DE TOLEDO2 SUMMARY A new species Clathrus argentinus L. Domínguez (ser. Latemoid) is des¬ cribed and illustrated. It has been found in the Provinces of Jujuy and Córdo¬ ba in Argentina; This is the fourth species recorded for the Argentine territory. The species bears affinities with Clathrus ruber Micheli ex Persoon from which it differs by its free columns (vertical arms), the occurrence of a glebifer and the nature of the arms tubes. Con motivo de mi trabajo de tesis sobre Gasteromycetes del centro de Argentina he tenido la ocasión de estudiar materiales que han resultado pertenecer a una nueva especie, que creo conveniente dar a conocer. Clathrus argentinus L. Domínguez nov. sp. (Fig. 1 A-P) Volva albido-eburnea, alutacea, 1-3 cm lata, 1,2-3,3 cm alta, infeme reticulata. Receptaculum obovatum, clatratum, 2,5-6 cm altum, 1,7-3,7 cm latum, roseosalmoneum, 6-7 columnisad basem disjunctis et una rete formatum; interstitiis minoribus in ápice (pen¬ tagons vel hexagonis), verticali modo elongatis ad basem; ramis ovoides, numerosS tubis, parvioribus in facie abaxiale, maioribus intemS formats. Glebifera prolongations digitiformibus, intersec- tione retís incidentibus. Gleba atrovirens, odore foetido. Sporae laeves, hyalinae, oblongae, apicibus obtusS, 3,9-6 x 1,6-2,5 pm. Habitat: in pinetis et margins agrorum. HOLOTYPUS: ARGENTINA. Prov. Jujuy: Dpto. San Pedro, per rutam N° 34 inter Los Lapachos et San Pedro. Laura D. de Toledo 431 (Leg.
    [Show full text]
  • A Second Record of the Species Clathrus Ruber P. Micheli Ex Pers. in Romania, and Notes on Its Distribution in Southeastern Europe
    ECOLOGIA BALKANICA 2020, Vol. 12, Issue 2 December 2020 pp. 213-217 Short note A Second Record of the Species Clathrus ruber P. Micheli ex Pers. in Romania, and Notes on its Distribution in Southeastern Europe Ciprian Bîrsan1*, Constantin Mardari1, Ovidiu Copoţ1, Cătălin Tănase2 1 - A. Fătu Botanical Garden, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iaşi, 7-9 Dumbrava Roşie, 700487 Iaşi, ROMANIA 2 - Faculty of Biology, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iaşi, Carol I 20A, 700505 Iaşi, ROMANIA *Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract. In this short note, the fungal species Clathrus ruber is reported for the second time in Romania, 60 years after the first record. It was identified in the northeastern part of the country, in Iaşi region, in a Lolium sward from a private garden. Twenty fruitbodies were counted between June and October 2020. It is not known how the species was brought into the garden. Key words: stinkhorns, rare species, distribution, new occurrence. Introduction on sandy and calcareous soils, in coniferous Clathrus ruber P. Micheli ex Pers. (syn. forests (Mallorca, Sardinia, Corsica), but also C. cancellatus Tourn. ex Fr.) is one of the two on the French Atlantic coast (Breitenbach & species of the genus Clathrus (Phallaceae, Kränzlin, 1986; Gerhardt, 1999). It is a Phallales) that have been identified in species with a Mediterranean origin, Romania (besides C. archeri (Berk.) Dring occurring throughout the year in southern (Bereş, 1996)). The species was first France. Sporadic occurrences have been described by the Italian botanist Pier reported in Central Europe. The species is Antonio Micheli in 1729 (Micheli, 1729).
    [Show full text]
  • Descargar En Formato
    ISSN: 2007-5049. DICIEMBRE 20 DE 2011 1 CUCBA | UNIVERSIDAD DE GUADALAJARA CUCBA | UNIVERSIDAD Bonellia nervosa (C. Presl) B. Ståhl & Källersjö Fotografía de Luz María González Villarreal. ISSN 2007-5049 9 772007 504003 Bonellia nervosa (C. Presl) B. Ståhl & Källersjö Fotografía de Luz María González Villarreal. Nota del editor Editor’s note Con la intención de llegar a un público más extenso With the intention to make it possible for more readers que hacen uso de las tecnologías actuales, se decidió to have easy access to our publications we have publicar la revista ibugana exclusivamente en decided to publish our bulletin ibugana exclusively formato digital. En México, el Instituto Nacional de in digital format. This does not imply that it is a new Derechos de Autor, establece que se reinicie la serie con journal and therefore libraries should not designate a un ISSN distinto y a partir del “número uno” para la new title for ibugana. However, the Mexican versión electrónica. Esto no significa que se trate de Instituto Nacional de Derechos de Autor requires otra revista, por ello no será necesario alterar los regis- distinct ISSN number beginning with “number one” for tros de la versión impresa que de ella se tengan en las the first electronic volume. Please note this difference bibliotecas. in future citations. Esta versión electrónica puede consultarse de manera The electronic version is available to anyone in: libre en la dirección: http://ibugana.cucba.udg.mx y http://ibugana.cucba.udg.mx. The page is designed está diseñada para imprimirse en papel tamaño carta to print on letter size paper (8.5 × 11 inches).
    [Show full text]
  • Clathrus Natalensis Fungal Planet Description Sheets 351
    350 Persoonia – Volume 41, 2018 Clathrus natalensis Fungal Planet description sheets 351 Fungal Planet 836 – 13 December 2018 Clathrus natalensis G.S. Medeiros, Melanda, T.S. Cabral, B.D.B Silva & Baseia, sp. nov. Etymology. Named in reference to the type locality, Natal City. tubes in transverse section. This species presents similarities with Clathrus cristatus with the colour of the arms and mesh Classification — Clathraceae, Phallales, Phallomycetidae. arrangement, but that presents basidiomata with crests along Immature basidiomata subglobose, 13–18 × 16–22 mm, greyish the arm edges (Fazolino et al. 2010), a characteristic absent in white (12A1–12B1 KW) with a single and thick rhizomorph grey- C. natalensis. In a BLASTn search, the ITS sequence obtained ish white (12A1–12B1 KW). Expanded basidiomata obovate to in this study has 94 % similarity to Clathrus ruber (GenBank subglobose 46–95 × 24–71 mm. Arm meshes pentagonal to GQ981501). However, C. ruber can easily be distinguished hexagonal, rugose at the beginning of development, becoming by the bright red colour, smaller meshes, and the immature smooth afterwards, 32–90 × 20–70 mm, dull red to pinkish white basidiome marked by reticulations (Dring 1980). In the phylo- (8B3–8A2), transverse section of an arm shows 3–4 tubes genetic analysis, C. natalensis does not group with any species subglobose, elongated to piriform. Pseudostipe absent. Gleba available on GenBank; in fact, they are clearly morphologically mucilaginous, in all inner part of arms, olive brown (KW 4F4), different. Clathrus columnatus and C. archeri show distinct re- with an unpleasant smell. Volva 50–140 × 10–40 mm, greyish ceptacle arrangements, columnar in the first, and united arms white (12A1–12B1 KW), with thick rhizomorph, greyish white below with pointed tips initially attached in the latter (Bosc 1811, (12A1–12B1 KW).
    [Show full text]
  • Notes, Outline and Divergence Times of Basidiomycota
    Fungal Diversity (2019) 99:105–367 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-019-00435-4 (0123456789().,-volV)(0123456789().,- volV) Notes, outline and divergence times of Basidiomycota 1,2,3 1,4 3 5 5 Mao-Qiang He • Rui-Lin Zhao • Kevin D. Hyde • Dominik Begerow • Martin Kemler • 6 7 8,9 10 11 Andrey Yurkov • Eric H. C. McKenzie • Olivier Raspe´ • Makoto Kakishima • Santiago Sa´nchez-Ramı´rez • 12 13 14 15 16 Else C. Vellinga • Roy Halling • Viktor Papp • Ivan V. Zmitrovich • Bart Buyck • 8,9 3 17 18 1 Damien Ertz • Nalin N. Wijayawardene • Bao-Kai Cui • Nathan Schoutteten • Xin-Zhan Liu • 19 1 1,3 1 1 1 Tai-Hui Li • Yi-Jian Yao • Xin-Yu Zhu • An-Qi Liu • Guo-Jie Li • Ming-Zhe Zhang • 1 1 20 21,22 23 Zhi-Lin Ling • Bin Cao • Vladimı´r Antonı´n • Teun Boekhout • Bianca Denise Barbosa da Silva • 18 24 25 26 27 Eske De Crop • Cony Decock • Ba´lint Dima • Arun Kumar Dutta • Jack W. Fell • 28 29 30 31 Jo´ zsef Geml • Masoomeh Ghobad-Nejhad • Admir J. Giachini • Tatiana B. Gibertoni • 32 33,34 17 35 Sergio P. Gorjo´ n • Danny Haelewaters • Shuang-Hui He • Brendan P. Hodkinson • 36 37 38 39 40,41 Egon Horak • Tamotsu Hoshino • Alfredo Justo • Young Woon Lim • Nelson Menolli Jr. • 42 43,44 45 46 47 Armin Mesˇic´ • Jean-Marc Moncalvo • Gregory M. Mueller • La´szlo´ G. Nagy • R. Henrik Nilsson • 48 48 49 2 Machiel Noordeloos • Jorinde Nuytinck • Takamichi Orihara • Cheewangkoon Ratchadawan • 50,51 52 53 Mario Rajchenberg • Alexandre G.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Mycology Index 2000 –2016 SPECIES INDEX 1
    Field Mycology Index 2000 –2016 SPECIES INDEX 1 KEYS TO GENERA etc 12 AUTHOR INDEX 13 BOOK REVIEWS & CDs 15 GENERAL SUBJECT INDEX 17 Illustrations are all listed, but only a minority of Amanita pantherina 8(2):70 text references. Keys to genera are listed again, Amanita phalloides 1(2):B, 13(2):56 page 12. Amanita pini 11(1):33 Amanita rubescens (poroid) 6(4):138 Name, volume (part): page (F = Front cover, B = Amanita rubescens forma alba 12(1):11–12 Back cover) Amanita separata 4(4):134 Amanita simulans 10(1):19 SPECIES INDEX Amanita sp. 8(4):B A Amanita spadicea 4(4):135 Aegerita spp. 5(1):29 Amanita stenospora 4(4):131 Abortiporus biennis 16(4):138 Amanita strobiliformis 7(1):10 Agaricus arvensis 3(2):46 Amanita submembranacea 4(4):135 Agaricus bisporus 5(4):140 Amanita subnudipes 15(1):22 Agaricus bohusii 8(1):3, 12(1):29 Amanita virosa 14(4):135, 15(3):100, 17(4):F Agaricus bresadolanus 15(4):113 Annulohypoxylon cohaerens 9(3):101 Agaricus depauperatus 5(4):115 Annulohypoxylon minutellum 9(3):101 Agaricus endoxanthus 13(2):38 Annulohypoxylon multiforme 9(1):5, 9(3):102 Agaricus langei 5(4):115 Anthracoidea scirpi 11(3):105–107 Agaricus moelleri 4(3):102, 103, 9(1):27 Anthurus – see Clathrus Agaricus phaeolepidotus 5(4):114, 9(1):26 Antrodia carbonica 14(3):77–79 Agaricus pseudovillaticus 8(1):4 Antrodia pseudosinuosa 1(2):55 Agaricus rufotegulis 4(4):111. Antrodia ramentacea 2(2):46, 47, 7(3):88 Agaricus subrufescens 7(2):67 Antrodiella serpula 11(1):11 Agaricus xanthodermus 1(3):82, 14(3):75–76 Arcyria denudata 10(3):82 Agaricus xanthodermus var.
    [Show full text]
  • MANTAR DERGİSİ/The Journal of Fungus Ekim(2019)10(2)70-81
    10 6845 - Volume: Issue:2 2019 JOURNAL E- ISSN:2147 e- October -KONYA-TURKEY FUNGUS Research Center JOURNAL OF OF JOURNAL Selçuk Selçuk University Mushroom Application and Selçuk Üniversitesi Mantarcılık Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi KONYA-TÜRKİYE MANTAR DERGİSİ E-DERGİ/ e-ISSN:2147-6845 Ekim 2019 Cilt:10 Sayı:2 e-ISSN 2147-6845 Ekim 2019 / Cilt:10/ Sayı:2 October 2019 / Volume:10 / Issue:2 SELÇUK ÜNİVERSİTESİ MANTARCILIK UYGULAMA VE ARAŞTIRMA MERKEZİ MÜDÜRLÜĞÜ ADINA SAHİBİ PROF.DR. GIYASETTİN KAŞIK YAZI İŞLERİ MÜDÜRÜ ÖĞR.GÖR.DR. SİNAN ALKAN Haberleşme/Correspondence S.Ü. Mantarcılık Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi Müdürlüğü Alaaddin Keykubat Yerleşkesi, Fen Fakültesi B Blok, Zemin Kat-42079/Selçuklu-KONYA Tel:(+90)0 332 2233998/ Fax: (+90)0 332 241 24 99 Web: http://mantarcilik.selcuk.edu.tr http://dergipark.gov.tr/mantar E-Posta:[email protected] Yayın Tarihi/Publication Date 30/10/2019 i e-ISSN 2147-6845 Ekim 2019 / Cilt:10/ Sayı:2 October 2019 / Volume:10 / Issue:2 EDİTÖRLER KURULU / EDITORIAL BOARD Prof.Dr. Abdullah KAYA (Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniv.-Karaman) Prof.Dr. Abdulnasır YILDIZ (Dicle Üniv.-Diyarbakır) Prof.Dr. Abdurrahman Usame TAMER (Celal Bayar Üniv.-Manisa) Prof.Dr. Ahmet ASAN (Trakya Üniv.-Edirne) Prof.Dr. Ali ARSLAN (Yüzüncü Yıl Üniv.-Van) Prof.Dr. Aysun PEKŞEN (19 Mayıs Üniv.-Samsun) Prof.Dr. A.Dilek AZAZ (Balıkesir Üniv.-Balıkesir) Prof.Dr. Ayşen ÖZDEMİR TÜRK (Anadolu Üniv.- Eskişehir) Prof.Dr. Beyza ENER (Uludağ Üniv.Bursa) Prof.Dr. Cvetomir M. DENCHEV (Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Bulgaristan) Prof.Dr. Celaleddin ÖZTÜRK (Selçuk Üniv.-Konya) Prof.Dr. Ertuğrul SESLİ (Trabzon Üniv.-Trabzon) Prof.Dr.
    [Show full text]