ZOOSYSTEMATICA ROSSICA, 26(2): 294–306 25 DECEMBER 2017

Review of the Palaearctic species of the genus Colpopyga (: Chrysididae) with description of a new species Обзор палеарктических видов рода Colpopyga (Hymenoptera: Chrysididae) с описанием нового вида

P. R OSA

П. РОЗА

P. Rosa, Via Belvedere 8/d, 20881 Bernareggio (MB), Italy. E-mail: [email protected]

Colpopyga Semenov, 1954, a chrysidid genus of the tribe (Chrysididae: Chrysidi- nae) with four Palaearctic and one Nearctic species, is reviewed. The study of internal urites (Noskiewicz & Lorencova, 1963) and new molecular data (Niehuis, pers. comm.) show a ge- neric status of Colpopyga, which is more related to the genus Dahlbom, 1854. A new species, Colpopyga nesterovi sp. nov. from Kazakhstan, is described and illustrated; it is easily recognizable by the red-coppery body coloration and shallow, small and sparse punctures. The status of the subspecies flavipes temperatum Linsenmaier, 1959 is updated to species level in the genus Colpopyga (comb. nov.). New generic combinations are also pro- posed for C. aureiventris (Mercet, 1904), comb. nov. and C. crassa (Bohart, 1978), comb. nov. (all from the genus Hedychridium). The lectotype of Hedychridium flavipes var. cyanomacula- tum Trautmann, 1927 is designated. Дан обзор ос-блестянок рода Colpopyga Semenov, 1954 из трибы Elampini (Chrysididae: ), включающий 4 палеарктических вида и 1 неарктический. Изучение вну- тренних уритов (Noskiewicz & Lorencova, 1963) и новые молекулярные данные (Niehuis, личное сообщение) показали самостоятельность Colpopyga и его близость к роду Holopy- ga Dahlbom, 1854. Описан и проиллюстрирован новый вид Colpopyga nesterovi sp. nov. из Казахстана, хорошо отличающийся красно-медной окраской и мелкой, редкой пун- ктировкой тела. Статус Hedychridium flavipes temperatum Linsenmaier, 1959 повышен до видового уровня в роде Colpopyga (comb. nov.). Предложены новые комбинации для C. aureiventris (Mercet, 1904), comb. nov. и C. crassa (Bohart, 1978), comb. nov. (все из рода Hedychridium). Обозначен лектотип Hedychridium flavipes var. cyanomaculatum Trautmann, 1927. Key words: Kazakhstan, Chrysidinae, Elampini, Hedychridium, new species, new combinations Ключевые слова: Казахстан, Chrysidinae, Elampini, Hedychridium, новый вид, новые со- четания

INTRODUCTION pes Eversmann, 1858, was inсluded in this genus, and Semenov (1954) noticed that The genus Colpopyga Se- Colpopyga resembles the genus Holopyga menov, 1954 (Hymenoptera: Chrysididae: Dahlbom, 1845. Chrysidinae: Elampini) was described A few years later, Linsenmaier (1959) based on some relevant generic diagnostic synonymised Colpopyga with Hedychridium features (shapes of the third metasomal ter- Abeille de Perrin, 1878 because their mem- gum and propodeal teeth), as well as on spe- bers share similar habitus and tarsal claw cific diagnostic characters (both sexes with structure with a median, perpendicular in- second metasomal tergum apically thick- ner tooth. In addition, he described two sub- ened, and metasoma with double punctua- species of H. flavipes based on metasomal tion). Only one species, flavi- punctuation, H. f. rugulosum Linsenmaier,

© 2017 Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Scienсes P. ROSA. REVIEW OF THE PALAEARCTIC SPECIES OF THE GENUS COLPOPYGA 295

1959 and H. f. temperatum Linsenmaier, [C. crassa (Bohart, 1978), comb. nov.]. But 1959, and recognised that H. auriventris no specimen of H. incisum and H. purum Mercet, 1904 (Iberian endemic) is closely was studied yet and their inclusion into the related to H. flavipes (Linsenmaier, 1959). genus Colpopyga is postponed when mate- However some years after, Noskiewicz & rial will be available for a more comprehen- Lorencowa (1963) revalidated the genus sive study. Consequently, a revision of the Colpopyga, based on a detailed study of Nearctic species of the H. crassum species- female internal urites of H. flavipes. They group sensu Bohart & Kimsey (1982) is illustrated the main differences with ho- needed. mologous urites of several Hedychridium In a recent study (Rosa, 2001) I new- species, and concluded that the outstand- ly dissected the female internal urites of ing diversity justify the legitimacy of the H. flavipes and found that they are more genus Colpopyga. Various authors followed similar to those of the genus Holopyga the generic classification proposed by Se- Dahlbom, 1845, yet extremely elongate. menov (1954) and Noskiewicz & Loren- Therefore, I tentatively included C. flavi- cowa (1963) for Colpopyga (e.g. Móczár, pes in the genus Hedychridium (Rosa, 2005, 1967; Nikol’skaya, 1978; Banaszak, 1980; 2006; Rosa et al., 2017), but writing that Vinokurov, 2006a, 2006b, 2007a, 2007b, the placement of this species in the genus 2008, 2009a, 2009b, 2013; Brustilo & Mar- Colpopyga would be more appropriate, due tinova, 2009). Nonetheless, Linsenmaier to its highly derived morphological charac- (1968) established the H. flavipes species- ters (e.g. cone-shaped T3, peculiar internal group in the genus Hedychridium, based on urites, metasoma flattened in lateral view, the same features considered by Semenov spiniform propodeal teeth, genitalia weakly (1954) of generic relevance, and included pigmented, cylindrical flagellomeres, etc.) three species: H. flavipes (with two sub- and that molecular analyses were needed to species H. f. rugulosum and H. f. tempera- assess the correct placement of this species tum), H. auriventris and H. elongatum Lin- and its species-group. At this moment, new senmaier, 1959. Hedychridium elongatum molecular, unpublished data (O. Niehuis, was later moved to the newly established pers. comm.) are available and support the H. elongatum species-group (Linsenmaier, generic status of Colpopyga, as well as its 1999) because of its short, not cylindrical clear affinity with the genus Holopyga, plac- flagellomeres, unmodified shape of the pro- ing C. flavipes outside the genus Hedychrid- podeal angles and T3 (Fig. 4I), thin and hy- ium, on a different lineage. Phylogenetic aline wing nervures and faint discoidal cell. data will be discussed in a forthcoming arti- In the Nearctic fauna, Bohart & Kimsey cle (O. Niehuis, pers. comm.). In this paper (1978, 1982) described three species in the a key to the Palaearctic species, remarks for genus Hedychridium, H. crassum Bohart, all Palaearctic Colpopyga and the descrip- 1978, H. incisum Bohart, 1978 and H. pu- tion of a new species, C. nesterovi sp. nov., rum Kimsey, 1978, and included them in the are provided. newly established H. crassum species-group. MATERIALS AND METHODS In their monograph of the chrysidid of the World, Kimsey & Bohart (1991) fol- Specimens were examined and described lowed Linsenmaier’s interpretation and under the stereomicroscope Togal SCZ; im- recognised that the Nearctic H. crassum ages were taken with a Nikon D-80 con- species-group is analogous to the Palaearc- nected to the stereomicroscope Togal SCZ tic H. flavipes species-group. Specimens of and stacked with the software Combine ZP. H. crassa (Bohart, 1978) were examined by The morphological terminology follows me in Genova Museum (Italy), and they Kimsey & Bohart (1991). The following share the typical features of Colpopyga abbreviations are used in the descriptions:

© 2017 Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Scienсes, Zoosystematica Rossica 26(2): 294–306 296 P. ROSA. REVIEW OF THE PALAEARCTIC SPECIES OF THE GENUS COLPOPYGA

F1, F2, F3 – flagellomeres 1, 2, 3; MOD – cone-shaped; structure of internal terga and mid ocellar diameter; MS – malar space, the sterna modified, highly elongated; male T3 shortest distance between the base of the dimorphic, evenly rounded; male genitalia mandible and the margin of the compound weakly pigmented (Figs 6F, 6G); in both eye; OOL – oculo-ocellar line, the shortest sexes, flagellomeres elongate, cylindrical, distance between the lateral ocellus and the F1 at least twice as long as broad; propodeal compound eye; P – pedicel; PD – puncture tooth (= posterior propodeal projection) diameter; POL – the shortest distance be- spiniform (Fig. 1A); legs largely or entirely tween posterior ocelli; T1, T2, T3 – meta- non-metallic, yellow; tegulae brown; apical somal terga 1, 2, 3; l/w = relative length to margin of T3 with narrow hyaline-brown- width. ish rim, medially emarginate; one single Types of the newly described species submedian perpendicular tooth on claws; are deposited in the Zoological Institute of basal vein curved; frons without transverse the Russian Academy of Sciences, St Pe- frontal carina; face with sparse erect setae; tersburg, Russia (ZIN) and in the author’s malar spaces less than 1 MOD; undifferen- private collection (PRC). Other examined tiated facial punctuation, between punc- types are deposited in the following collec- tures of frons and those among eye margin tions and museums: Institute for Biology and scapal basin; scapal basin shallow, medi- and Pedology, National Academy of Sci- ally cross-ridged; mandibles tridentate; mid ences, Bishkek, Kyrgyz Republic (IBB); and hind tibia without pits on inner surface; Invertebrate collections of the Institute of forewing medial vein arched. Systematics and Evolution of , Pol- Remarks. Colpopyga can be distingui- ish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland shed from Hedychridium by sexual dimor- (ISEA-PAN); Musée Cantonal de Zoologie, phic structure of T3 which is cone-shaped Lausanne, Switzerland (MCZL); Musée in females; in both sexes T3 medially emar- d’Histoire Naturelle, Genève, Switzerland ginated, with narrow hyaline-brownish rim (MHNG); Museo Nacional de Ciencias along apical margin; metasomal sterna en- Naturales, Madrid, Spain (MNCN); Natur- tirely metallic; female internal sterna and Museum, Luzern, Switzerland (NMLS). terga (see Noskiewicz & Lorencowa, 1963) with peculiar shape, noticeably elongated TAXONOMIC PART and different from that of the internal urites of Hedychridium; pinned female specimens Order HYMENOPTERA usually have the ovipositor exserted; male Family CHRYSIDIDAE genitalia weakly pigmented and elongated; propodeal tooth distinctly pointed and Subfamily CHRYSIDINAE spiniform. Members of this genus are 3.5– Tribe ELAMPINI 7.0 mm long, and those from the Old World can be easily recognizable also for their pe- Genus Colpopyga Semenov, 1954 culiar coloration and legs entirely or largely non-metallic yellow, contrasting with me- Colpopyga Semenov, 1954: 137. Colopyga: Kimsey & Bohart 1991: 181, incorrect tallic body colour; for this reason they are subsequent spelling. commonly called “yellow-legged cuckoo wasps” (Zettel, 2017). Type species: Hedychrum flavipes Ever- smann, 1858, by original designation and monotypy. Colpopyga auriventris (Mercet, 1904), Diagnosis. The genus Colpopyga Se- comb. nov. menov, 1954 is characterised by female (Figs 1D, 2D, 3D, 4A) metasoma highly modified, flattened in Hedychridium auriventris Mercet, 1904: 85. Ho- lateral view; T3 elongate (Figs 3A, C–F), lotype, female: Spain, Los Molinos (MNCN).

© 2017 Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Scienсes, Zoosystematica Rossica 26(2): 294–306 P. ROSA. REVIEW OF THE PALAEARCTIC SPECIES OF THE GENUS COLPOPYGA 297

Fig. 1. Habitus, females, dorsal view. A, Colpopyga flavipes flavipes (Eversmann), Italy; B, C. flavi- pes rugulosa (Linsenmaier), Cyprus; C, C. temperata (Linsenmaier), holotype, Morocco; D, C. auri- ventris (Mercet), Spain; E, C. nesterovi sp. nov., paratype, Kazakhstan. Scale bar: 1.0 mm.

Fig. 2. Habitus, males, dorsal view. A, Colpopyga flavipes flavipes (Eversmann), Italy; B, C. flavipes rugulosa (Linsenmaier), paratype, Iran; C, C. temperata (Linsenmaier), Morocco; D, C. auriventris (Mercet), Spain; E, C. nesterovi sp. nov., paratype, Kazakhstan. Scale bar: 1.0 mm.

Diagnosis. Length 4.0–6.0 mm. Recogni- red colour on pronotum and mesonotum, in zable by its metasoma, in lateral view, ex- the male with coppery colour; head poste- ceedingly flattened (Fig. 3D), metasoma rior to ocelli, metanotum and propodeum punctures small and dense, with tiny punc- blue; metasoma metallic, dorsally red, ven- tures on interspaces (Fig. 4A), body color- trally golden-greenish. Female fore femur ation (Figs 1D, 2D): head and mesosoma ventrally metallic green, mid- and hind legs metallic green, in the female with extensive entirely non-metallic; male femora ventral-

© 2017 Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Scienсes, Zoosystematica Rossica 26(2): 294–306 298 P. ROSA. REVIEW OF THE PALAEARCTIC SPECIES OF THE GENUS COLPOPYGA

Fig. 3. Habitus, females, lateral view. A, Colpopyga flavipes flavipes (Eversmann), Italy; B, C. flavi- pes rugulosa (Linsenmaier), Cyprus; C, C. temperata (Linsenmaier), paratype, Tunisia; D, C. auriven- tris (Mercet), Spain; E, C. nesterovi sp. nov., paratype, Kazakhstan. Scale bar: 1.0 mm. ly metallic. Female F1 and F2 pale brown Hedychridium flavipes var. cyanomaculatum to yellow. Propodeal teeth slightly pointing Trautmann, 1927: 63. Lectotype: male (here downwards (Fig. 1D). designated): Tunisia, Kairouan, 24.VI.1919 Bionomics. Unknown. Collected on sun- (leg. Santschi), coll. Trautmann (Berlin) [examined]. ny and stony wall looking for sphecidoid nests (Mingo & Gayubo, 1986). Diagnosis. Length 5.0–7.0 mm. Colpopy- Distribution. Endemic to Spain (Castil- ga flavipes flavipes is recognizable by its la) (Linsenmaier, 1959; Mingo, 1985, 1994). metasoma (lateral view) with apical margin of T2 swollen over T3 (Fig. 3A); metasomal punctures dense, laterally and apically dis- Colpopyga flavipes flavipes tinctly double (Fig. 4D), body coloration (Eversmann, 1858) green to blue, with large metasomal darker (Figs 1A, 2A, 3A, 4D, 4H) spot. Female F1 and F2 at least ventrally brown to yellowish, except for some insular Hedychrum flavipes Eversmann, 1858: 552. Ho- populations (Corsica). lotype, female: Russia, Ural (ISEA-PAN) Remarks. Colpopyga f. flavipes is the [examined]. most widespread subspecies in the Pa- Hedychrum solandii Courtiller, 1859: 65. Holo- type, female: France, Saumur (depository laearctic, yet only rarely and occasionally unknown). Synonymised by Mocsáry (1889: collected. It is very variable in coloration: 133). metallic green (especially males), light or Holopyga bellipes Mocsáry 1879: 121. Holotype, dark blue, violet, with a large, non-metallic, female: Hungary, Budapest (HMNH) [exam- antero-medial black spot on T2 (Figs 1A, ined]. Synonymised by Mocsáry (1889: 134). 1B, 2A, 2B).

© 2017 Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Scienсes, Zoosystematica Rossica 26(2): 294–306 P. ROSA. REVIEW OF THE PALAEARCTIC SPECIES OF THE GENUS COLPOPYGA 299

Fig. 4. T3, dorso-lateral view. A, Colpopyga auriventris (Mercet), female, Spain; B, C. nesterovi sp. nov., female, holotype, Kazakhstan; C, C. nesterovi sp. nov., male, paratype, Kazakhstan; D, C. fla- vipes flavipes (Eversmann), female, Italy; E, C. flavipes rugulosa (Linsenmaier), female, Cyprus; F, C. temperata (Linsenmaier), female, holotype, Morocco; G, C. temperata (Linsenmaier), male, Tuni- sia; H, C. flavipes cyanomaculata (Trautmann), male, lectotype, Tunisia; I, Hedychridium elongatum Linsenmaier, holotype, Morocco.

Linsenmaier (1999) without type exam- following Kimsey & Bohart (1991) and ination synonymised H. flavipes cyanomac- H. flavipes cyanomaculatum as synonym of ulatum Trautmann, 1927 with Hedychrum C. flavipes. cyaneum Brullé, 1846. Description of the The two syntypes of H. f. cyanomacula- latter taxon was based on a single specimen tum were examined by me and the male col- collected at Cape Town (South Africa), lected in June 24th, 1919 is here designated and the type is apparently lost (Rosa & Xu, as the lectotype. In C. f. cyanomaculata the 2015). This synonym is unfounded and un- apical margin of T2 in lateral view is not reliable, and the placement of H. cyaneum distinctly thickened (as in the nominotypi- in the genus Hedychridium is not supported cal form), nevertheless the punctuation of by any evidence (in the original descrip- T2 and T3 is clearly double (Fig. 4H) com- tion tarsal claws are described as bifidous). pared with male specimens of C. temperata Consequently we consider H. cyaneum as an collected in Morocco (Fig. 4G). Moreover, unknown species in the genus Hedychrum the shape of the propodeal angles (posterior

© 2017 Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Scienсes, Zoosystematica Rossica 26(2): 294–306 300 P. ROSA. REVIEW OF THE PALAEARCTIC SPECIES OF THE GENUS COLPOPYGA propodeal projection) in these specimens is tion varies, gradually becoming coarser and slightly pointing outwards (Figs 2A, 2B), deeper from western to eastern Mediter- whereas in C. temperata is distinctly curved ranean populations. Apparently in Turkey backwards (Fig. 2C). Since only two speci- both the subspecies have been collected in mens of C. f. cyanomaculata have been stud- the same administrative regions (Erzurum, ied, we consider this taxon as a geographi- İzmir, Konya), but this overlapping distri- cal variation, waiting for the examination of bution may be the result of incorrect iden- more material and a possible assignment to tifications, and these specimens should be subspecific rank. double checked. Bionomics. Unknown. Observed feeding Bionomics. Unknown. on flowers of Laserpitium siler, Xanthium spi- Distribution. Eastern Mediterranean, nosum, Allium sp., pulegium, M. ro- Middle East and Western Asia: Cyprus, tundifolia, various Apiaceae, and in Rubus Iran, Turkey, Uzbekistan [Kugitan Sta- and juniper cave twigs (Rosa, 2006). In the te Reserve (NMLS)], (new record), Ka- southernmost part of its range, C. flavipes zakhstan [Alma Ata; Talgara (ZIN)] (new is bivoltine, with two generations in May– record), Kyrgyzstan [Tian-Shan, Ala-Too July and August–September (Rosa, 2006). (IBB)] (new record), and Turkmenistan Distribution. Armenia [Yerevan (ZIN)] [Daşköpri (ZIN)] (new record). Northeast (new record), Austria, Corsica, Czech Africa: Egypt (Linsenmaier, 1999). Republic, France, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Moldova, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Rus- Colpopyga temperata sia [Centre and South of the European part (Linsenmaier, 1959), stat. nov. (including Crimea); North Caucasus; Ural], (Figs 1C, 2C, 3C, 4F, 4G) Slovakia, Spain, Switzerland, Tunisia, Tur- Hedychridium flavipes temperatum Linsenmaier, key, and Ukraine. 1959: 57. Holotype, female: Morocco, Oued Tensift (MCZL) [examined]. Colpopyga flavipes rugulosa Diagnosis. Length 3.5–4.0 mm. Colpo- (Linsenmaier, 1959) pyga temperata is recognisable by the even, (Figs 1B, 2B, 3B, 4E) simple metasomal punctuation with small Hedychridium flavipes rugulosum Linsenmaier, punctures, instead of double and dense punc- 1959: 57. Holotype, female: Cyprus (NMLS) tures along lateral and posterior margins, and [examined]. without irregular, coarse punctures medially Diagnosis. Length 5.0–7.0 mm. Colpo- on T2 (Figs 1C, 2C, 3C, 4F, 4G); in lateral pyga flavipes rugulosa is easy recognisable view, apical margin of T2 not thickened, con- from the nominotypical subspecies by its tinuous with T3 (Figs 3C, 4F, 4G). coarser metasomal punctuation, with shin- Remarks. Linsenmaier (1959) described ing interspaces between larger punctures C. temperata as the westernmost Mediterra- (Fig. 4E), apical margin of T2 even more nean subspecies of C. f. flavipes with simple thickened (Figs 3B, 4E), and transversal punctuation, compared to C. f. rugulosa with median carina strongly raised. coarse, double punctuation, from the oppo- Remarks. C. flavipes rugulosa is consid- site side of the Mediterranean Sea. Never- ered conspecific with C. flavipes for the theless, other diagnostic characters argue for swollen structure of the second metasomal a full-species status of this form. In particu- tergum and the double metasomal punc- lar, the shape of T2, not thickened [already tuation. Differences in the size of the meta- considered as a specific character by Bohart somal punctuation may be in relation with & Kimsey (1978) for Holarctic species] and the geographic area: it is well documented the elongate pronotum (l/w > 2.8 vs. 2.4–2.5 by Linsenmaier (1959) that in many and in C. f. flavipes and C. f. rugulosa). not related Chrysididae taxa body punctua- Bionomics. Unknown.

© 2017 Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Scienсes, Zoosystematica Rossica 26(2): 294–306 P. ROSA. REVIEW OF THE PALAEARCTIC SPECIES OF THE GENUS COLPOPYGA 301

Fig. 5. Colpopyga nesterovi sp. nov., female, holotype. A, head, front view; B, head, dorsal view; C, mesosoma, dorsal view; D, mesosoma, lateral view; E, metasoma, dorsal view; F, metasoma, ventral view. Scale bar: 0.5 mm.

Distribution. Southern Spain (Jerez de la Colpopyga nesterovi Rosa, sp. nov. Fronteira), Northern Africa (Morocco, Al- (Figs 1E, 2E, 3E, 4B, 4C, 5) geria, Tunisia) to Palestine (Jericho) (Lin- Holotype. Female, Kazakhstan: Aktobe Prov., senmaier, 1959, 1968), and Israel [Hazeva, Mugodzhary Mt., Emba River valley, 17.VI.1985, Arava valley (PRC)] (new record). leg. M. Nesterov (ZIN).

© 2017 Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Scienсes, Zoosystematica Rossica 26(2): 294–306 302 P. ROSA. REVIEW OF THE PALAEARCTIC SPECIES OF THE GENUS COLPOPYGA

Fig. 6. Colpopyga nesterovi sp. nov., male, paratype (A–E, G) and C. flavipes (Eversmann), male (F). A, head, frontal view; B, mesosoma, dorsal view; C, mesosoma, lateral view; D, metasoma, dorsal view; E, metasoma, postero-lateral view; F, G, genital capsule. Scale bar: 0.5 mm.

Paratypes. Kazakhstan: 1 male, same data, Female. Head. OOL = 1.5 MOD; POL = locality and collector (ZIN); 1 male, same local- 2.3 MOD; MS = 1.0 MOD; relative length ity, 6.VI.1985 (PRC); 1 female, SE Kazakhstan, of P : F1 : F2 : F3 = 1.0 : 1.4 : 1.2 : 1.1. Frons 20 km W of Chundzha, canyon Tekesay, Bolshie Boguty crest, 20.VI.1998, leg. V. Kazenas (ZIN). and vertex with small- to medium-sized, Description. Body length 4.5–5.5 mm. contiguous punctures (0.2–0.5 MOD); in Fore wing length 3.0–3.5 mm. frontal view, between scapal basin and eye,

© 2017 Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Scienсes, Zoosystematica Rossica 26(2): 294–306 P. ROSA. REVIEW OF THE PALAEARCTIC SPECIES OF THE GENUS COLPOPYGA 303 gradually decreasing from frons to clypeus Male similar to female (Fig. 6), with (Fig. 5A); scapal basin medially transverse- longer and denser setae; femora extensively ly microridged. Face almost flat. Ocellar metallic red; pronotum with larger inter- triangle isosceles; midocellus anteriorly and spaces among punctures; T3 short and api- posterior ocelli laterally slightly sunken. cally rounded, medially slightly emarginate. Flagellomeres cylindrical: F1 length 2.3 Genital capsule as in Fig. 6G. times breadth, F2 = 1.9, F3 = 1.7, F4 to Etymology. The specific epithet nesterovi F11 = 1.5 (Fig. 5A). Mandibles tridentate (masculine noun in genitive case) is dedi- (Fig. 6A). Subantennal space 1.0 MOD. cated to M.A. Nesterov, collector of the ho- Mesosoma. Pronotum with double, con- lotype specimen. A. Kilimnik already chose tiguous punctuation. Mesoscutum mostly this name and pinned three specimens in with large, aligned punctures, horizontally the general collection of ZIN as Colpopyga confluent, forming transversal wrinkles nesterovi, but the description of this species (Fig. 5C, 6B). Mesoscutellum with dou- was never published. ble punctuation, with shining interspaces. Bionomics. Unknown. Metascutellum with foveate-reticulate Distribution. Kazakhstan (Aktobe Pro- punctures (Fig. 5C). Propodeal teeth spi- vince). niform, acute, slightly pointing backward. Comparative diagnosis. Colpopyga nest- Forewing medial vein medially arched, lon- erovi sp. nov. is easily recognisable for the ger than RS stub. metasomal punctuation and the body col- Metasoma. T1 and T2 with even, mi- oration. In particular, the metasomal punc- nute, sparse punctures, 1–2 PD apart (Figs tuation is characterised by even, tiny, sparse 5E, 6D), laterally denser. T3 with denser, punctures with shining interspaces, whereas deeper punctures, postero-laterally larger, in C. flavipes the punctuation is double, in more or less contiguous (Fig. 6E); posterior C. auriventris is simple, with small, deep, margin with hyaline rim, apico-medially contiguous punctures, and in C. temperata is weakly incised (Fig. 4B). simple too, but punctures are clearly sepa- Colouration. Body metallic red-coppery; rated, about 1.0 MOD apart. The almost ocellar triangle darker to purplish; scape, uniform red-rosy to coppery coloration is di- face and lateral sides of mesosoma, includ- agnostic for C. nesterovi sp. nov.; in compar- ing propodeum, greenish; posterior margin ison, C. flavipes and C. temperata are almost of pronotum greenish in one paratype. T2 uniformly green to blue or violet, whereas with or without a large, well-limited, darker head and mesosoma of C. auriventris are bi- to blackish area; ventrally metallic green- coloured: green to blue, with red or greenish ish (Fig. 5F). Scape metallic green, pedicel colour on frons, pronotum, mesonotum and basally darker, apically yellowish; F1–F3 mesoscutellum. yellowish, F4–F11 yellowish to brownish; legs variable: fully yellowish, including hind Key to the Palaearctic species of the genus coxa and trochanter in the holotype, or with Colpopyga metallic green coxae, trochanters and fem- ora baso-ventrally in the female paratype. 1. Body colour more or less uniform metallic Wings hyaline, smoky around Rs. green to blue or violet, with a distinct me- Vestiture. Body dorsally covered with dian, matt, dark to blackish dark spot on T2 (Figs 1A–C) ...... 2 short, whitish setae (less or around 1.0 – Body colour various, yet metasoma always MOD); on metasomal terga, posteriorly entirely metallic red to coppery, with or and laterally with sparse setae (> 2 MOD), without darkened median area on T2 (Figs longer on coxae and femora. Face laterally 1D–E) ...... 4 covered with adpressed, silvery setae, even 2. In lateral view, T2 apically thickened, convex in the female. (Figs 3A, 3B); punctuation of metasoma dis-

© 2017 Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Scienсes, Zoosystematica Rossica 26(2): 294–306 304 P. ROSA. REVIEW OF THE PALAEARCTIC SPECIES OF THE GENUS COLPOPYGA

tinctly double (Figs 4D, 4E); pronotum more Indeed, this species does not belong to than 2.8 times as long as wide; T3 slightly to the genus Colpopyga, but is closely allied strongly transversely carinate ...... 3 to the H. ardens species-group for general – In lateral view, T2 apically not thickened, habitus, yet separated by the slightly coni- flat (Fig. 3C); punctuation of metasoma sim- cal T3 (Fig. 4I). ple (Figs 4F, 4G); pronotum 2.4–2.5 times as long as wide; T3 transversely ecarinate ...... Distribution. Endemic to Morocco (Lin- ...... C. temperata senmaier, 1959). 3. In lateral view, T2 apically standing out over T3; double punctuation on T2 dense (Fig. Spintharis pallipes Tournier, 1879 4D); T3 with weak transverse median carina (Fig. 4D) ...... C. flavipes flavipes Spintharis pallipes Tournier, 1879: 99. Syntypes – In lateral view, T2 apically largely protrud- male, female: Russia: Sarepta (MHNG) [exa- ing over T3 (Fig. 3B); double punctuation on mined]. T2 sparse (Fig. 4E) and with shining inter- Spintharis pallidipes Dalla Torre 1892: 36. Incor- spaces between larger punctures (Fig. 3B); rect subsequent spelling. T3 with strong transverse median carina Remarks. Spintharis pallipes has been (Fig. 4E) ...... C. flavipes rugulosa tentatively included in various genera: 4. Metasoma with small, dense, deep punctures Spintharis Klug 1845 (Tournier, 1879; Moc- (Fig. 4A); head and mesosoma blue, dorsally sáry, 1889; Bischoff, 1913), Spintharina greenish (male) to coppery (female) on frons, Semenov, 1892 (Zimmermann, 1950), and pronotum, mesoscutum and mesoscutellum Hedychridium Latreille, 1806 (Trautmann, (Figs 1D, 2D, 3D); metasoma metallic red, without darkened T2 median area ...... 1926, as variation of H. flavipes) and was ...... C. auriventris finally synonymised with Hedychridium – Metasoma with tiny, scattered, shallow flavipes by Linsenmaier (1951: 99). Kimsey punctures (Figs 4B, 4C); body almost uni- & Bohart (1991) followed this interpreta- formly red-coppery, with or without dark- tion. Linsenmaier (1997: 253) considered ened T2 median area (Figs 1E, 2E, 3E, 5, 6) . . S. pallipes close to Hedychridium moricei du ...... C. nesterovi sp. nov. Buysson, 1904 without type examination and without any further remark. Additional notes In Tournier’s collection (currently Chrysididae collection), housed at MHNG, Hedychridium elongatum there are three male syntypes of S. pallipes. Linsenmaier, 1959 These specimens are not conspecific with (Fig. 4I) C. flavipes, conversely they are really con- specific with Hedychridium moricei. Since Hedychridium elongatum Linsenmaier, 1959: H. moricei is the name currently in use, this 57. Holotype, female: Morocco, Tafraout case will be discussed in a forthcoming no- (MCZL) [examined]. menclatorial article. Remarks. Hedychridium elongatum was considered by Linsenmaier (1959) as ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS closely related to C. auriventris Mercet, and included in the H. flavipes species-group I am indebted to Sergey Belokobylskij (ZIN) (Linsenmaier, 1968). Later Linsenmaier for the loan of the newly described specimens, (1999) moved H. elongatum into its own Marco Bernasconi (NMLS) for the loan of species group, characterised by hyaline, Linsenmaier’s types; Anne Freitag, Jessica Del- hayes, and Marion Podolak (MCZL) for the thin wing nervures; faint discoidal cell; ra- pictures of types from de Beaumont’s collection; dial vein about twice as long as pterostigma; Michael Ohl and Lukas Kirschey (Museum für slightly conical shape of T3 (Fig. 4I); meta- Naturkunde, Berlin, Germany), for the pictures soma ventrally metallic; simple fore femur; of types from Trautmann’s collection; Dmitry unmodified shape of the propodeal angles. Milko (IBB) for the study of Tarbinsky’s collec-

© 2017 Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Scienсes, Zoosystematica Rossica 26(2): 294–306 P. ROSA. REVIEW OF THE PALAEARCTIC SPECIES OF THE GENUS COLPOPYGA 305 tion. A special thank to Maurizio Pavesi (Museo Linsenmaier W. 1968. Revision der Familie di Storia Naturale, Milan, Italy) and Arkadiy Chrysididae (Hymenoptera). Zweiter Nacht- Lelej (Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia rag. Mitteilungen der Schweizerischen Ento- Terrestrial Biodiversity, Russian Academy of mologischen Gesellschaft, 41(1–4): 1–144. Sciences, Vladivostok, Russia) for critical re- Linsenmaier W. 1997. Altes und Neues von den view of the manuscript and useful suggestions, Chrysididen (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae). and to David Baldock (Milford, England) for Entomofauna, 18(19): 245–300. proofreading the English manuscript. Linsenmaier W. 1999. Die Goldwespen Nor- dafrikas (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae). Ento- REFERENCES mofauna, 10 (Supplement): 1–210. Mercet García R. 1904. Especies españolas Banaszak J. 1980. Złotolitki Chrysididae. Kata- del genero Hedychridium. Bolétin de la Real log Fauny Polski, 26: 1–52. Sociedad Española de Historia Natural, 4: Bischoff H. 1913. Hymenoptera. Fam. Chrysi- 144–153. didae. In: Wytsman P. (Ed.). Genera Insec- Mingo E. 1985. Especies españolas del género torum. Fascicule 151. Bruxelles, L. Desmet- Hedychridium Ab., 1878 (Hym., Chrysidi- Verteneuil. 86 p. + 5 pls. dae). Eos, 40: 189–204. Bohart R.M. & Kimsey L.S. 1978. A revision Mingo E. 1994. Hymenoptera Chrysididae. Fa- of the New World species of Hedychridium una Iberica. Museo Nacional de Ciencias Na- (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae). Proceedings of turales Consejo Superior de Investigaciones the Biological Society of Washington, 91(3): Científicas, 6. Madrid. 256 p. 590–635. Mingo E. & Gayubo S.F. 1986. Contribución Brustilo K.V. & Martynov V.V. 2009. Prelimi- al conocimiento de los crisídidos de la pro- nary data towards a study of cuckoo wasps vincial de Ciudad Real (Hym., Chrysididae). (Hymenoptera: Chrysididae) in eastern Eos, 62: 125–136. Ukraine. Transactions of the Kharkov Ento- Mocsáry A. 1879. Hymenoptera nova e Fauna mological Society, 17(1–2): 38–61. (In Rus- Hungarica. Természetrajzi Füzetek, 3: 115– sian). 141. Courtiller A. 1859 (1858). Descriptions des Mocsáry A. 1889. Monographia Chrysididarum chrysidides observes aux environs de Sau- Orbis Terrarum Universi. Budapest: Hungar- mur. Annales de la Société linnéenne du ian Academy of Science. 643 p. département de Maine-et-Loire, 3: 61–72. Móczár L. 1967. Femdarázsalkatúak – Chry- Dalla Torre K.W. 1892. Catalogus hymenopter- sidoidea. Magyarország Állatvilága. Fauna orum hucusque descriptorum systematicus et Hungariae, 86(2): 1–118. synonymicus. Volumen VI. Chrysididae (Tu- Nikol’skaya M.N. 1978. Chrysidoidea. In: Med- bulifera). Wilhelm Engelmann, Lipsiae. ix + vedev G.S. (Ed.). Opredelitel’ nasekomykh 118 p. evropeyskoy chasti SSSR [Key to the Eversmann E. 1858 (1857). Fauna Hymenop- of the European part of the USSR]. Lenin- terologica Volgo-Uralensis. Bulletin de la grad: Nauka, 3(1): 58–71. (In Russian). Sociéte Imperiale des Naturalistes de Moscou, Noskiewicz J. & Lorenvowa J. 1963. Über den 30: 544–567. taksonomischen Wert der Gattung Colpo- Kimsey L.S. & Bohart R.M. 1991 (1990). The pyga Sem. Polskie Pismo Entomologiczne, Chrysidid wasps of the World. New York: Ox- 33(15): 245–252. ford Press. 652 p. Rosa P. 2001. I Crisidi (Hymenoptera, Chrysidi- Linsenmaier W. 1951. Die europäischen Chrysi- dae) della Valle d’Aosta. Dissertation. Uni- diden (Hymenoptera). Versuch einer natürli- versità degli Studi di Pavia. 247 p. + 111 pl. chen Ordnung mit Diagnosen. Mitteilungen Rosa P. 2005. La collezione di Crisidi (Hyme- der Schweizerischen Entomologischen Gesell- noptera, Chrysididae) del Museo Civico di schaft, 24(1): 1–110. Storia Naturale di Milano. Natura, 94(2), Linsenmaier W. 1959. Revision der Familie 1–128. Chrysididae (Hymenoptera) mit besonderer Rosa P. 2006. I Crisidi della Valle d’Aosta (Hyme- Berücksichtigung der europäischen Spezies. noptera, Chrysididae). Monografie del Museo Mitteilungen der Schweizerischen Entomolo- Regionale di Scienze Naturali. Vol. 6. Aosta: gischen Gesellschaft, 32(1): 1–232. St.-Pierre. 368 pp., xvi + 32 pls.

© 2017 Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Scienсes, Zoosystematica Rossica 26(2): 294–306 306 P. ROSA. REVIEW OF THE PALAEARCTIC SPECIES OF THE GENUS COLPOPYGA

Rosa P., Belokobylskij S.A. & Zaytseva L.A. mological Society. Krasnodar, 9–15 Septem- 2017. The Chrysididae types described by ber 2007]: 50–51. Krasnodar. (In Russian). Semenov-Tian-Shanskij and deposited at the Vinokurov N.B. 2007b. Laccolith mountains Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy and cretaceous ridges of the Caucasian Min- of Sciences, Saint Petersburg (Insecta, Hy- eral spas as refugium for the fauna of cuckoo menoptera). Proceedings of the Zoological In- wasps from the subfamily Hedychrinae in stitute RAS, Supplement 5: 1–266. foothills of the Central Caucasus. Gornye Rosa P. & Xu Z-f. 2015. Annotated type cata- ekosistemy i ikh komponenty. Trudy mezhdun- logue of the Chrysididae (Insecta, Hyme- arodnoy konferentsii. 13–18 avgusta 2007 g. noptera) deposited in the collection of Maxi- Chast’ 1 [Mountain ecosystems and their milian Spinola (1780–1857), Turin. ZooKeys, components. Proceedings of the Internation- 471: 1–96. al Conference. 13–18 August 2007. Part 1]: Semenov-Tian-Shanskij A. 1954. Classification 138–142. Moscow. (In Russian). of the tribe Hedychrini Mocs. (Hymenop- Vinokurov N.B. 2008. Rare species of cuckoo tera, Chrysididae) and description of new wasps (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae) from the species. Trudy Zoologicheskogo Instituta Aka- region of Caucasian Mineral Waters and pe- demii Nauk SSSR, 15: 138–145. (In Russian). culiarities of their ecology. Zhivye ob’ekty v Tournier H. 1879. Description d’Hyménop- usloviyakh antropogennogo pressa. Materialy tères nouveaux appartenant à la famille des X Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy Chrysides. Bulletin et Annales de la Société ekologicheskoy konferentsii. 15–18 senty- Royale Belge, 22: 87–100. abrya 2008, g. Belgorod [Living objects in the Trautmann W. 1926. Untersuchungen an ei- conditions of anthropogenic press. Materials nigen Goldwespenformen. Entomologische of the X International Scientific environ- Zeitchrift, 40: 4–12. mental Conference. 15–18 September 2008. Trautmann W. 1927. Die Goldwespen Europas. Belgorod]: 44. Belgorod. (In Russian). Weimar: G. Uschmann. 194 p. Vinokurov N.B. 2009a. Rare species of chry- Vinokurov N.B. 2006a. Daily activity and sea- sidid wasps (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae) sonal dynamics of flight in cuckoo wasps from the Caucasian Mineral Waters area and (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae) in Central features of their ecology. Scientific Journal Ciscaucasia. Problemy ekologii gornykh ter- of Belgorod State University, 11(66, 9/1): ritoriy: sbornik nauchnykh trudov [Problems 82–85. (In Russian). of Ecology of Mountain Territories: Collec- Vinokurov N.B. 2009b. Cuckoo wasps (Hyme- tion of scientific papers]: 19–21. Moscow. (In noptera, Chrysididae) in steppe biocenoses Russian). of the Middle Kama region (North Cau- Vinokurov N.B. 2006b. Fauna of chrysidid casus). Stepi Severnoy Evrazii: Materialy V wasps (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae) of mezhdunarodnogo simpoziuma [Steppes of mountain and hill landscapes of Central Cau- Northern Eurasia: Materials of the V Inter- casus and Ciscaucasus. Simpozium stran SNG national Symposium], 1: 206–208. Orenburg po pereponchatokrylym nasekomym. Moskva, (In Russian). 26–29 sentyabrya 2006 g. Programma i tezisy Vinokurov N.B. 2013. Peculiarities in ecology dokladov [Symposium of Hymenopterous of cuckoo wasps (Hymenoptera, Chrysidi- insects from CIS Countries. Programs and dae) in soil biocenoses from the northen mac- conference abstracts, Moscow, 26–29 Sep- roslope of the Central Caucasus. Proceedings tember 2006]: 21. Moscow. (In Russian). of the Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Vinokurov N.B. 2007a. Analysis of the cuck- Academy of Sciences, 15[3(3)]: 1105–1109. oo wasps fauna (Hymenoptera, Chrysidi- (In Russian). dae) of Central Ciscaucasia. Проблемы и Zettel H. 2017. Wiederfunde der Gelbbeinigen перспективы общей энтомологии. Tezisy Goldwespe, Hedychridium flavipes (Ever- dokladov XIII s’ezda Russkogo entomo- smann, 1857) (Hymenoptera: Chrysididae), ä logicheskogo obshchestva. Krasnodar, 9–15 in Wien. Beitr ge zur Entomofaunistik, 18: sentyabrya 2007 g. [Problems and prospects 158–161. of General Entomology: Сonference ab- Received 20 Nov. 2017 / Accepted 5 Dec. 2017 stracts. XIII Congress of the Russian Ento- Editorial responsibility: S.A. Belokobylskij, A.I. Khalaim

© 2017 Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Scienсes, Zoosystematica Rossica 26(2): 294–306