DOCSLIB.ORG

Get the Data out Real Time Data Dissemination from Isolated

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Get the Data out Real Time Data Dissemination from Isolated Get the Data Out Real Time Data Dissemination from Isolated Monitoring Stations within the Delta American Water Works Association California-Nevada Section 2013 Fall Conference October 1, 2013 Mark Bettencourt California Department of Water Resources Municipal Water Quality Program Today’s discussion The Real Time Data and Forecasting – Comprehensive Program, a part of the California Department of Water Resource’s Municipal Water Quality Program. Program Design, Rules for Success and Goals Information Products In California, more than 20 million people rely on Sacramento - San Joaquin Delta water for all or part of their drinking water supply. Due to the organic nature of the Delta and its geographic relationship with seawater intrusion and agricultural runoff inputs, treatment of Delta water presents the challenge of providing protection from both pathogens and simultaneously from the formation of disinfection byproducts (DBP’s, chemicals potentially harmful to humans). Disinfectant (Chlorine) + Natural Organic Material (NOM) +/- Bromide → DBP’s (Trihalomethanes (THM’s), Haloacetic acids (HAA’s)) Chloroform Bromodichloromethane Chlorodibromomethane Bromoform Monobromoacetic acid Dichloroacetic acid Monochloroacetic acid Dibromoacetic acid Trichloroacetic acid Disinfectant (Ozone) + Bromide Bromate Bromate Would drinking water suppliers like to know what the quality of their source water is before it arrives at their treatment facilities? MWQP Mission Statement The mission of the Municipal Water Quality Investigations (MWQI) Program is to: a) Support the effective and efficient use of the State Water Project (SWP) as a source water supply used for municipal purposes through monitoring, forecasting, and reporting of SWP water quality. b) Provide early warning of changing conditions in source water quality used for municipal purposes. c) Provide data and knowledge based support for operational decision- making on the SWP. d) Conduct scientific studies of drinking water importance. e) Provide scientific support to the Department of Water Resources (DWR), the State Water Project Contractors Authority (SWPCA), MWQI Specific Project Committee (MWQI-SPC), and other governmental entities. The Three Components of the Real Time Data Forecasting And Comprehensive Program (RTDF-CP) Modeling/Forecasting DSM2 Delta DSM2 Aqueduct Extension Model Sacramento River WARMF Real Time Monitoring San Joaquin River WARMF Organic carbon and Bromide Seasonal Forecasts Short Term Aqueduct Forecasts Data Collection from the Stations Delta Source Fingerprinting Artificial Neural Network Hood Vernalis Banks Jones Information Dissemination Gianelli The RTDF-CP provides a single Station Operation and location that compiles and Maintenance disseminates the data Data QA/QC & Storage Visualization Dissemination Program elements include: Instrumentation installed at key locations Field operations that ensure proper operation of all automated sampling equipment Timely transmission of real-time data Consistent modeling with continuous updates which provides the best forecasting possible QA/QC of the instruments and data Important Principles of the Program Real time monitoring requires • steady maintenance, inspection, and cleaning. • an inventory of spare parts, especially those prone to wear and breakage Success requires staff who: • understand the systems in detail • understand the unique dynamics at each site • want to do this kind of work; aptitude & creativity • know to prepare for preventative/seasonal maintenance Only then can you keep these systems running well The data produced by the RTDF-CP are used to: Make informed decisions affecting the Delta and SWP (State Water Project) Support the development of water quality forecasting tools Provide early warning of changing water quality conditions Provide information for water quality and water supply planning studies (In addition to DWR and the SWP contractors, this information can be used by federal, state, local, non-governmental organizations and the public.) The Stations Vernalis Hood (San Joaquin River) (Sacramento River) CW “Bill” Jones Pumping HO Banks Pumping Plant Plant State Water Project (CVP/SLDMWA) William R. Gianelli Pumping Plant (San Luis Reservoir) The Real Time Data Data Production Carbon Analyzer … Anion Analyzer Instrument computer Wireless Cellular Server with instrument software Modem or third party data processing software loaded on to it. YSI sonde (Gianelli) Station Station Einstein User’s External Instruments Computer Server Computer Data Remote Data Transfer Scripts RTDF Scripts Via Raven Cellular Modem Website Anion Data Utility Non Analyzer FileZilla Database QA/QC MagIC Net or - Chromeleon MWQI Data CDEC Organic Website Text Files Carbon Indigo FileZilla Remote Analyzer Connection Outside Remote Desktop Database Connection Direct Transfer Remote Transfer (FTP) Remote Access Database/Data Utility QA/QC … Water Data California Data Exchange Center (CDEC) Library (WDL) … Data Products…. Water Quality Report Summary Page and Webpage … MWQI RTDF Water Quality Report Summary Table 8/5/2013 This report is part of the Real Time Data and Forecasting (RTDF) project. The full RTDF water quality report is available online at http://www.water.ca.gov/waterquality/drinkingwater/rtdf_rprt.cfm. Data are mean daily and seven day averages. Missing data is indicated by "m". All data are preliminary and subject to revision without notice. 7/29/13 8/4/13 % Change 7-day Average Sacramento River (Hood) Mean Daily Flow, cfs 17043 16485 -4 16899 Salinity (EC), µS/cm 149 154 +3 150 DOC, mg/L 1.62 1.59 -2 1.57 TOC, mg/L 1.66 1.66 <1 1.64 San Joaquin River (Vernalis) Mean Daily Flow, cfs 617 531 -14 527 Salinity (EC), µS/cm 525 465 -12 500 DOC, mg/L 2.83 1.46 -49 2.27 TOC, mg/L 2.93 1.75 -41 2.35 Bromide, mg/L 0.24 0.22 -8 0.24 H.O. Banks Pumping Plant (SWP) Mean Daily Pumping, cfs 5407 3961 -27 4780 Salinity (EC), µS/cm 451 569 +26 496 DOC, mg/L 2.38 2.39 <1 2.44 TOC, mg/L 2.61 2.55 -3 2.69 Bromide, mg/L 0.28 0.37 +31 0.33 C.W. Jones Pumping Plant (DMC) Mean Daily Pumping, cfs 3456 3510 +1 3446 Salinity (EC), µS/cm 420 461 +9 449 DOC, mg/L 2.35 2.44 +3 2.43 TOC, mg/L 2.58 2.30 -11 2.48 Bromide, mg/L 0.26 0.31 +16 0.30 Gianelli Pumping Plant (SWP) Mean Daily Pumping, cfs 0 m --- 554 Mean Daily Generation, cfs 2366 m --- 878 Salinity (EC), µS/cm 509 509 -1 493 DOC, mg/L 3.37 3.1 -9 3.06 TOC, mg/L 3.62 3.58 -2 3.36 Bromide, mg/L 0.24 m --- 0.24 Barker Slough Pumping Plant Mean Daily Pumping, cfs 106 104 -2 105 Salinity (EC), µS/cm 201 192 -5 198 Turbidity, NTU 41 21 -49 29 Victoria Canal Near Byron Salinity (EC), µS/cm 297 330 +11 319 Delta Total Outflow.cfs Outflow, cfs 4997 6177 +23 6394 (Comments updated on 8/5/13) Delta Conditions: Sacramento River flow at Freeport is approximately the same as last week, about 16,500 cfs. No changes are expected through the week. Current flow conditions on the Feather River at Gridley show cfs at about 5500. The NOAA River Forecast Center shows a possible stage increase through 10 August. In the San Joaquin River (near Vernalis), flow is currently just over 520 cfs. It is predicted to decrease to 430 cfs by 10 August. EC in the San Joaquin (at Vernalis) is averaging about 480 uS/cm. The predicted flow decrease could possibly produce an increased EC although the change would most likely be small. EC at Banks PP has been rising over the past month and as of 01 August; the average was 467 uS/cm. On the other hand, EC at Clifton Court Forebay stopped its upward trend on the 1st and has leveled off with the average coming in at about 490 uS/cm. Pumping has decreased from an average of 5818 cfs on 31 July to about 4000 cfs on 04 August. According to CDEC, daily average Delta total outflow was just above 6000 cfs on the 3rd and 4th. Model predictions show EC at selected points through 19 August leveling off. Could it be that EC's have peaked for the time being? EC above Jones pumping plant has also leveled off and is currently averaging just above 460 uS/cm. It leveled off on the same date as Clifton Court. Current average pumping just came up from 3272 cfs to 3515 cfs. The overall organic carbon trend at Banks is downward with TOC concentrations coming in near 2.5 mg/L and DOC at 2.35 mg/L. (The closeness of the TOC and DOC data indicates that the filters are over loading or there is a possible internal clog inside the carbon instrument.) Like Banks, Jones PP OC is also trending downward with levels at about 2.3 mg/L TOC and 2.1 mg/L DOC. At the Sacramento River station at Hood, TOC is running at 1.45 mg/L and DOC at 1.3 mg/L. (Current data suggests filter or instrument clogging.) Current OC levels at Vernalis are 1.8 mg/L for TOC and 1.2 mg/L for DOC. The latest information from the station lead indicates that the data is bad due to insufficient sample flow. Bromide at Banks is following EC and continues on an upward path. The current level is approximately 0.38 mg/L. At Vernalis, bromide is currently running at 0.22 mg/L and holding steady. Jones PP bromide appears to have leveled off following EC. The current level is 0.27 mg/L. Pumping data from Gianelli is currently not available. Bromide levels are currently coming in at about 0.1 mg/L while TOC and DOC are running at 3.6 and 3.3 respectively. Instruments: Banks: The instruments ran normally during the week. There was however an issue with the Sprint network on August 1st where we lost connectivity to the station.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 0 5 10 15 20 Miles Μ and Statewide Resources Office
    Woodland RD Name RD Number Atlas Tract 2126 5 !"#$ Bacon Island 2028 !"#$80 Bethel Island BIMID Bishop Tract 2042 16 ·|}þ Bixler Tract 2121 Lovdal Boggs Tract 0404 ·|}þ113 District Sacramento River at I Street Bridge Bouldin Island 0756 80 Gaging Station )*+,- Brack Tract 2033 Bradford Island 2059 ·|}þ160 Brannan-Andrus BALMD Lovdal 50 Byron Tract 0800 Sacramento Weir District ¤£ r Cache Haas Area 2098 Y o l o ive Canal Ranch 2086 R Mather Can-Can/Greenhead 2139 Sacramento ican mer Air Force Chadbourne 2034 A Base Coney Island 2117 Port of Dead Horse Island 2111 Sacramento ¤£50 Davis !"#$80 Denverton Slough 2134 West Sacramento Drexler Tract Drexler Dutch Slough 2137 West Egbert Tract 0536 Winters Sacramento Ehrheardt Club 0813 Putah Creek ·|}þ160 ·|}þ16 Empire Tract 2029 ·|}þ84 Fabian Tract 0773 Sacramento Fay Island 2113 ·|}þ128 South Fork Putah Creek Executive Airport Frost Lake 2129 haven s Lake Green d n Glanville 1002 a l r Florin e h Glide District 0765 t S a c r a m e n t o e N Glide EBMUD Grand Island 0003 District Pocket Freeport Grizzly West 2136 Lake Intake Hastings Tract 2060 l Holland Tract 2025 Berryessa e n Holt Station 2116 n Freeport 505 h Honker Bay 2130 %&'( a g strict Elk Grove u Lisbon Di Hotchkiss Tract 0799 h lo S C Jersey Island 0830 Babe l Dixon p s i Kasson District 2085 s h a King Island 2044 S p Libby Mcneil 0369 y r !"#$5 ·|}þ99 B e !"#$80 t Liberty Island 2093 o l a Lisbon District 0307 o Clarksburg Y W l a Little Egbert Tract 2084 S o l a n o n p a r C Little Holland Tract 2120 e in e a e M Little Mandeville
    [Show full text]
  • Transitions for the Delta Economy
    Transitions for the Delta Economy January 2012 Josué Medellín-Azuara, Ellen Hanak, Richard Howitt, and Jay Lund with research support from Molly Ferrell, Katherine Kramer, Michelle Lent, Davin Reed, and Elizabeth Stryjewski Supported with funding from the Watershed Sciences Center, University of California, Davis Summary The Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta consists of some 737,000 acres of low-lying lands and channels at the confluence of the Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers (Figure S1). This region lies at the very heart of California’s water policy debates, transporting vast flows of water from northern and eastern California to farming and population centers in the western and southern parts of the state. This critical water supply system is threatened by the likelihood that a large earthquake or other natural disaster could inflict catastrophic damage on its fragile levees, sending salt water toward the pumps at its southern edge. In another area of concern, water exports are currently under restriction while regulators and the courts seek to improve conditions for imperiled native fish. Leading policy proposals to address these issues include improvements in land and water management to benefit native species, and the development of a “dual conveyance” system for water exports, in which a new seismically resistant canal or tunnel would convey a portion of water supplies under or around the Delta instead of through the Delta’s channels. This focus on the Delta has caused considerable concern within the Delta itself, where residents and local governments have worried that changes in water supply and environmental management could harm the region’s economy and residents.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 2015 CCSDA Newsletter
    Contra Costa Special Districts Association Newsletter Contra Costa Chapter of the California Special Districts Association Fall 2015 October 2015 Ironhouse Sanitary District General Ironhouse new General Manager Manager Tom Williams Retires Chad Davisson, the new General Manager for Ironhouse You don’t have to look too hard to see the changes, Sanitary District (ISD), started on July 13, 2015. Chad innovations and conservation techniques that Tom comes to the District with over 25 years of wastewater Williams has helped bring to Ironhouse Sanitary District industry experience. (ISD) during his 15 years there, including the past 10 as He also has 10 years of general manager. It is those lasting contributions that executive level organization Williams leaves behind. management experience. He has a Bachelor of Arts Congratulations Degree in Public Administration Tom Williams for 15 from San Diego State University and is scheduled to receive his years’ service, ten MBA Degree from Saint Mary’s College in Moraga January years as Manager! 2016. He served as the General Manager of the Richmond First hired as the district’s engineer under the Municipal Sewer District, worked for the City of San leadership of then GM David Bauer, Williams dove in Mateo as the Environmental Services Division Manager, on existing projects around the old treatment plant. the Water Reclamation Systems Plant Manager for When Bauer retired, Williams easily made the transition Olivenhain Water District and the Industrial Waste to overseeing the day-to-day operations of the district. Control Representative for the County of San Diego. One of his first major projects was building a railroad He has also worked as a consultant for Crescent City, undercrossing to safely bring workers and the public the City of Ontario, the City of Montclair and the past what had been a non-signalized grade crossing Olivenhain Municipal Water District.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter Chinook Salmon in the Central Valley of California: Life History and Management
    Winter Chinook salmon in the Central Valley of California: Life history and management Wim Kimmerer Randall Brown DRAFT August 2006 Page ABSTRACT Winter Chinook is an endangered run of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) in the Central Valley of California. Despite considerablc efforts to monitor, understand, and manage winter Chinook, there has been relatively little effort at synthesizing the available information specific to this race. In this paper we examine the life history and status of winter Chinook, based on existing information and available data, and examine the influence of various management actions in helping to reverse decades of decline. Winter Chinook migrate upstream in late winter, mostly at age 3, to spawn in the upper Sacramento River in May - June. Embryos develop through summer, which can expose them to high temperatures. After emerging from the spawning gravel in -September, the young fish rear throughout the Sacramento River before leaving the San Francisco Estuary as smolts in January­ March. Blocked from access to their historical spawning grounds in high elevations of the Sacramento River and tributaries, wintcr Chinook now spawn below Kcswick Dam in cool tail waters of Shasta Dam. Their principal environmental challcnge is temperature: survival of embryos was poor in years when outflow from Shasta was warm or when the fish spawned below Red Bluff Diversion Dam (RBDD), where river temperature is higher than just below Keswick. Installation of a temperature control device on Shasta Dam has reduccd summer temperature in the discharge, and changes in operations of RBDD now allow most winter Chinook access to the upper river for spawning.
    [Show full text]
  • Transitions for the Delta Economy
    Transitions for the Delta Economy January 2012 Josué Medellín-Azuara, Ellen Hanak, Richard Howitt, and Jay Lund with research support from Molly Ferrell, Katherine Kramer, Michelle Lent, Davin Reed, and Elizabeth Stryjewski Supported with funding from the Watershed Sciences Center, University of California, Davis Summary The Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta consists of some 737,000 acres of low-lying lands and channels at the confluence of the Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers (Figure S1). This region lies at the very heart of California’s water policy debates, transporting vast flows of water from northern and eastern California to farming and population centers in the western and southern parts of the state. This critical water supply system is threatened by the likelihood that a large earthquake or other natural disaster could inflict catastrophic damage on its fragile levees, sending salt water toward the pumps at its southern edge. In another area of concern, water exports are currently under restriction while regulators and the courts seek to improve conditions for imperiled native fish. Leading policy proposals to address these issues include improvements in land and water management to benefit native species, and the development of a “dual conveyance” system for water exports, in which a new seismically resistant canal or tunnel would convey a portion of water supplies under or around the Delta instead of through the Delta’s channels. This focus on the Delta has caused considerable concern within the Delta itself, where residents and local governments have worried that changes in water supply and environmental management could harm the region’s economy and residents.
    [Show full text]
  • Simulation of Flows and Water Quality in the California Aqueduct Using DSM2
    Simulation of Flows and Water Quality in the California Aqueduct Using DSM2 Siqing Liu, Bob Suits DWR, Bay Delta Office, Modeling Support Branch 2011 CWEMF Annual Meeting, February 28 –March 2 1 Topics • Project objectives • Aqueduct System modeled • Assumptions / issues with modeling • Model results –Flows / Storage, EC, Bromide 2 Objectives Simulate Aqueduct hydraulics and water quality • 1990 – 2010 period • DSM2 Aqueduct version calibrated by CH2Mhill Achieve 1st step in enabling forecasting Physical System Canals simulated • South Bay Aqueduct (42 miles) • California Aqueduct (444 miles) • East Branch to Silverwood Lake • West Branch to Pyramid Lake (40 miles) • Delta‐Mendota Canal (117 miles) 4 Physical System, cont Pumping Plants Banks Pumping Plant Buena Vista (Check 30) Jones Pumping Plant Teerink (Check 35) South Bay Chrisman (Check 36) O’Neill Pumping-Generating Edmonston (Check 40) Gianelli Pumping-Generating Alamo (Check 42) Dos Amigos (Check 13) Oso (West Branch) Las Perillas (Costal branch) Pearblossom (Check 58) 5 Physical System, cont Check structures and gates • Pools separated by check structures throughout the aqueduct system (SWP: 66, DMC: 21 ) • Gates at check structures regulate flow rates and water surface elevation 6 Physical System, cont Turnout and diversion structures • Water delivered to agricultural and municipal contractors through diversion structures • Over 270 diversion structures on SWP • Over 200 turnouts on DMC 7 Physical System, cont Reservoirs / Lakes Represented as complete mixing of water body •
    [Show full text]
  • Comparing Futures for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta
    comparing futures for the sacramento–san joaquin delta jay lund | ellen hanak | william fleenor william bennett | richard howitt jeffrey mount | peter moyle 2008 Public Policy Institute of California Supported with funding from Stephen D. Bechtel Jr. and the David and Lucile Packard Foundation ISBN: 978-1-58213-130-6 Copyright © 2008 by Public Policy Institute of California All rights reserved San Francisco, CA Short sections of text, not to exceed three paragraphs, may be quoted without written permission provided that full attribution is given to the source and the above copyright notice is included. PPIC does not take or support positions on any ballot measure or on any local, state, or federal legislation, nor does it endorse, support, or oppose any political parties or candidates for public office. Research publications reflect the views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the staff, officers, or Board of Directors of the Public Policy Institute of California. Summary “Once a landscape has been established, its origins are repressed from memory. It takes on the appearance of an ‘object’ which has been there, outside us, from the start.” Karatani Kojin (1993), Origins of Japanese Literature The Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta is the hub of California’s water supply system and the home of numerous native fish species, five of which already are listed as threatened or endangered. The recent rapid decline of populations of many of these fish species has been followed by court rulings restricting water exports from the Delta, focusing public and political attention on one of California’s most important and iconic water controversies.
    [Show full text]
  • Power and Energy Technical Report, DEIS
    Draft Power and Energy Technical Report Shasta Lake Water Resources Investigation, California Prepared by: U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Mid-Pacific Region U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation June 2013 Contents Contents Chapter 1 Affected Environment ....................................................................................... 1-1 Environmental Setting .............................................................................................................. 1-1 Shasta Lake and Vicinity ................................................................................................. 1-7 Upper Sacramento River (Shasta Dam to Red Bluff) ...................................................... 1-9 Lower Sacramento River and Delta ............................................................................... 1-10 CVP/SWP Service Areas ............................................................................................... 1-12 Chapter 2 Modeling Results ................................................................................................ 2-1 Chapter 3 Bibliography ....................................................................................................... 3-1 Tables Table 1-1. Central Valley Project Power Plants, Capacities, and Historical Annual Generation ................................................................................................................. 1-5 Table 1-2. Major State Water Project Facilities, Capacities, and Historical Power Generation
    [Show full text]
  • USGS 7.5-Minute Image Map for Clifton Court Forebay, California
    O C O A C T S N I O U C U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Q CLIFTON COURT FOREBAY QUADRANGLE A A U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY R O CALIFORNIA T J 4 N N 7.5-MINUTE SERIES O Union Island A n█ C 121°37'30" 35' S 32'30" 121°30' 6 000m 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6270000 FEET 37°52'30" 22 E 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 37°52'30" C S A O N N T J 6 5 . R . .. O ( . .. 4 ! 3 2 2 . .. 3 .. .. A A C Q U Victoria O I S N Island T C 2140000 A O 4192000mN CAMINO DIABLO C O CAMINO DIABLO FEET 4192 Widdows Island 7 8 10 Eucalyptus 9 10 11 11 Island Old 41 h Riv 91 g Kings er u o l . Island . S ... 4191 . n n .. D a R i l I I a T t T I E . N . O . .. .. .... B . .. .. S CAL PACK RD . .. .. 4190 ... ○ 4190 . ... ... ... .. 14 ... 18 17 Coney Island 16 15 . 15 . .. .. 14 . ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... Clifton Court . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. .. .. .. Forebay . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ........ ... .. ....... .. .. T1S R4E CLIFTON CT RD 4189 4189 CLIFTON CT . .. .. .... .... Union Island . .... .. .. .. Brushy ... Cr ... .. .. Imagery................................................NAIP, January 2010 Roads..............................................©2006-2010 Tele Atlas Names...............................................................GNIS, 2010 50' 50' Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 2010 Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 2010 4188 23 22 HOLEY RD 23 19 20 21 22 23 Byron 41 Byron 88 Airport Airport t 24 c u d e u q A a a i n r o f i l . a .
    [Show full text]
  • A Century of Delta Salt Water Barriers
    A Century of Salt Water Barriers in the Delta By Tim Stroshane Policy Analyst Restore the Delta June 5, 2015 edition Since the late 19th century, California’s basic plan for water resource development has been to export water from the Sacramento River and the Delta to the San Joaquin Valley and southern California. Unfortunately, this basic plan ignores the reality that the Delta is the very definition of an estuary: it is where fresh water from the Central Valley’s rivers meets salt water from tidal flow to the Delta from San Francisco Bay. Productive ecosystems have thrived in the Delta for millenia prior to California statehood. But for nearly a century now, engineers and others have frequently referred to the Delta as posing a “salt menace,” a “salinity problem” with just two solutions: either maintain a predetermined stream flow from the Delta to Suisun Bay to hydraulically wall out the tide, or use physical barriers to separate saline from fresh water into the Delta. While readily admitting that the “salt menace” results from reduced inflows from the Delta’s major tributary rivers, the state of California uses salt water barriers as a technological fix to address the symptoms of the salinity problem, rather than the root causes. Given complex Delta geography, these two main solutions led to many proposals to dam up parts of San Francisco Bay, Carquinez Strait, or the waterway between Chipps Island in eastern Suisun Bay and the City of Antioch, or to use large amounts of water—referred to as “carriage water”— to hold the tide literally at bay.
    [Show full text]
  • 550. Regulations for General Public Use Activities on All State Wildlife Areas Listed
    550. Regulations for General Public Use Activities on All State Wildlife Areas Listed Below. (a) State Wildlife Areas: (1) Antelope Valley Wildlife Area (Sierra County) (Type C); (2) Ash Creek Wildlife Area (Lassen and Modoc counties) (Type B); (3) Bass Hill Wildlife Area (Lassen County), including the Egan Management Unit (Type C); (4) Battle Creek Wildlife Area (Shasta and Tehama counties); (5) Big Lagoon Wildlife Area (Humboldt County) (Type C); (6) Big Sandy Wildlife Area (Monterey and San Luis Obispo counties) (Type C); (7) Biscar Wildlife Area (Lassen County) (Type C); (8) Buttermilk Country Wildlife Area (Inyo County) (Type C); (9) Butte Valley Wildlife Area (Siskiyou County) (Type B); (10) Cache Creek Wildlife Area (Colusa and Lake counties), including the Destanella Flat and Harley Gulch management units (Type C); (11) Camp Cady Wildlife Area (San Bernadino County) (Type C); (12) Cantara/Ney Springs Wildlife Area (Siskiyou County) (Type C); (13) Cedar Roughs Wildlife Area (Napa County) (Type C); (14) Cinder Flats Wildlife Area (Shasta County) (Type C); (15) Collins Eddy Wildlife Area (Sutter and Yolo counties) (Type C); (16) Colusa Bypass Wildlife Area (Colusa County) (Type C); (17) Coon Hollow Wildlife Area (Butte County) (Type C); (18) Cottonwood Creek Wildlife Area (Merced County), including the Upper Cottonwood and Lower Cottonwood management units (Type C); (19) Crescent City Marsh Wildlife Area (Del Norte County); (20) Crocker Meadow Wildlife Area (Plumas County) (Type C); (21) Daugherty Hill Wildlife Area (Yuba County)
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Restoration Program Agreement
    Fish Restoration Program Agreement Implementation Strategy Habitat Restoration and Other Actions for Listed Delta Fish Department of Water Resources and Department of Fish and Game in coordination with the US Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service Cover: Prospect Island, Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channel, and Liberty Island (Photo Credit: Dale Kolke) State of California The Resources Agency Department of Water Resources March 2012 Fish Restoration Program Agreement Implementation Strategy Habitat Restoration and Other Actions for Listed Delta Fish Prepared by: With assistance from: Heidi Rooks Department of Fish and Game Stephani Spaar Dave Zezulak Dennis McEwan Fred Jurick Jason Roberts Laura Flournoy Carl Wilcox Tim Smith Jim Starr Gina Benigno Gina Van Klompenburg Pamela Lindholm Tim Stevens Ling Chu Chandra Ferrari Laurence Kerckhoff Delta Stewardship Council Kristal Davis‐Fadtke PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ii Table of Contents 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Purpose ................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 FRPA Goals and Objectives ................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Program Description ............................................................................................................. 2 1.3.1 Program Structure and
    [Show full text]