Distribution, Organization and Expression of Genes Concerned with Anaerobic Lactate
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.04.438253; this version posted April 4, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Distribution, organization and expression of genes concerned with anaerobic lactate- 2 utilization in human intestinal bacteria 3 Author list: Paul O. Sheridan1, Petra Louis1, Eleni Tsompanidou2, Sophie Shaw3, Hermie J. 4 Harmsen2, Sylvia H. Duncan1, Harry J. Flint1*, Alan W. Walker1* 5 *These authors contributed equally 6 7 1Gut Health Group, Rowett Institute, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, Scotland, 8 AB25 2ZD, UK 9 2Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University of Groningen University Medical 10 Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands 11 3Centre for Genome-Enabled Biology and Medicine, 23 St. Machar Drive, Aberdeen, Scotland, 12 AB24 3RY, UK 13 Corresponding author: Alan W. Walker: [email protected] 14 15 Keywords: Human gut microbiota; lactate-utilizing bacteria; anaerobic metabolism; 16 upregulation by lactate; transcriptomics 17 18 Repositories: Novel draft genomes that were generated for this study are available from 19 GenBank under BioProject PRJNA701799. RNA-seq data have been deposited in the 20 ArrayExpress database at EMBL-EBI (www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress) under accession number 21 E-MTAB-10136. 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.04.438253; this version posted April 4, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 22 Abstract 23 Lactate accumulation in the human gut is linked to a range of deleterious health impacts. 24 However, lactate is consumed and converted to the beneficial short chain fatty acids butyrate 25 and propionate by indigenous lactate-utilizing bacteria. To better understand the underlying 26 genetic basis for lactate utilization, transcriptomic analysis was performed for two prominent 27 lactate-utilizing species from the human gut, Anaerobutyricum soehngenii and Coprococcus 28 catus, during growth on lactate, hexose sugar, or hexose plus lactate. In A. soehngenii L2-7, 29 six genes of the lct cluster including NAD-independent D-lactate dehydrogenase (i-LDH) were 30 co-ordinately upregulated during growth on equimolar D and L-lactate (DL-lactate). 31 Upregulated genes included an acyl-CoA dehydrogenase related to butyryl-CoA 32 dehydrogenase, which may play a role in transferring reducing equivalents between reduction 33 of crotonyl-CoA and oxidation of lactate. Genes upregulated in C. catus GD/7 included a six- 34 gene cluster (lap) encoding propionyl CoA-transferase, a putative lactoyl-CoA epimerase, 35 lactoyl-CoA dehydratase and lactate permease, and two unlinked acyl-CoA dehydrogenase 36 genes that are candidates for acryloyl-CoA reductase. An i-LDH homolog in C. catus is 37 encoded by a separate, partial lct, gene cluster, but not upregulated on lactate. While C. catus 38 converts three mols of DL-lactate via the acrylate pathway to two mols propionate and one mol 39 acetate, some of the acetate can be re-used with additional lactate to produce butyrate. A key 40 regulatory difference is that while glucose partially repressed lct cluster expression in A. 41 soehngenii, there was no repression of lactate utilization genes by fructose in the non-glucose 42 utilizer C. catus. This implies that bacteria such as C. catus might be more important in 43 curtailing lactate accumulation in the gut. 44 45 Impact statement 2 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.04.438253; this version posted April 4, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 46 Lactate can be produced as a fermentation by-product by many gut bacteria but has the potential 47 to perturb intestinal microbial communities by lowering luminal pH, and its accumulation has 48 been linked to a range of deleterious health outcomes. Fortunately, in healthy individuals, 49 lactate tends not to accumulate as it is consumed by cross-feeding lactate-utilizing bacteria, 50 which can convert it into the beneficial short chain fatty acids butyrate and propionate. Lactate- 51 utilizing gut bacteria are therefore promising candidates for potential development as novel 52 probiotics. However, lactate-utilizers are taxonomically diverse, and the genes that underpin 53 utilization of lactate by these specialized gut bacteria are not fully understood. In this study we 54 used transcriptomics to compare gene expression profiles of Anaerobutyricum soehngenii and 55 Coprococcus catus, two prominent lactate-utilizing species in the human gut, during growth 56 on lactate alone, sugar alone, or sugar plus lactate. The results revealed strong upregulation of 57 key, but distinct, gene clusters that appear to be responsible for lactate utilization by these, and 58 other, gut bacterial species. Our results therefore increase mechanistic understanding of 59 different lactate utilization pathways used by gut bacteria, which may help to inform selection 60 of optimal lactate-utilizing species for development as novel therapeutics against colonic 61 microbiota perturbations. 62 63 Data summary 64 Novel draft genomes generated for this study have been made available from GenBank 65 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/) under BioProject number PRJNA701799. RNA- 66 seq data have been deposited in the ArrayExpress database at EMBL-EBI 67 (www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress) under accession number E-MTAB-10136. Further details of 68 additional existing genomic data that were analyzed in this project are given in Table 1 and 69 Table S2. 3 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.04.438253; this version posted April 4, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 70 Introduction 71 The human large intestinal microbiota is dominated by obligately anaerobic bacteria, whose 72 growth is largely dependent on the supply of complex carbohydrates and proteins available for 73 fermentation. These substrates are mostly fermented by resident gut anaerobes to short chain 74 fatty acids (SCFAs) and gases, and in the healthy colon the major faecal SCFAs detected are 75 acetate, propionate and butyrate [1]. Lactate is another fermentation product of many anaerobic 76 bacteria that colonize the mammalian gut, either as a major metabolite, as in Lactobacillus and 77 Bifidobacterium spp., or as an alternative hydrogen sink [2]. However, as the pKa (3.73) for 78 lactic acid is lower than that of other fermentation acids such as acetate (4.76), accumulation 79 of lactate has the potential to dramatically change the gut environment and gut microbiota 80 composition via reduction in prevailing pH [3]. 81 Lactate may therefore help to inhibit the growth of some pathogenic bacteria with poor 82 tolerance for lower pHs [4] and a gut microbiota dominated by lactate-producing bacteria is 83 found in many healthy pre-weaned infants [5]. On the other hand, there are many known 84 deleterious impacts of lactate accumulation in the gut. Indeed, the phenomenon of lactic 85 acidosis, driven by excessive production of lactate following fermentation of easily digestible 86 dietary carbohydrates, is well known in ruminants and is a major problem in animal husbandry 87 [6, 7]. Similarly, in humans, accumulation of toxic D-lactate is life-threatening in short bowel 88 syndrome [8]) and lactate accumulation is also associated with severe colitis [9]. Additionally, 89 lactate can be utilized as a carbon and energy source by certain intestinal pathogens such as 90 Salmonella [10] and Campylobacter [11], compounding the potential heath detriments of 91 lactate accumulation in the gut. 92 However, in the colon of healthy adult humans, as well as in the non-acidotic rumen, lactate 93 does not accumulate, due the activities of cross-feeding, lactate-utilizing bacteria [12]. Colonic 4 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.04.438253; this version posted April 4, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 94 lactate concentrations are therefore a balance between bacterial production during fermentation 95 and utilization by lactate-utilizing bacteria, which can use lactate to form acetate, propionate 96 or butyrate [13]. Recent research has linked the populations and activities of these lactate- 97 utilizing bacteria with overall fermentation patterns and productivity [14], and a low abundance 98 of commensal lactate-utilizers has also been proposed to make gut microbial communities 99 inherently less stable and more prone to lactate-induced perturbations [15]. As such, lactate- 100 utilizing bacteria have been proposed as promising candidates for development as novel 101 probiotics [15-18]. 102 The ability to utilize lactate as an energy source for growth appears to be limited to relatively 103 few bacterial species among the human intestinal microbiota, although these species are 104 taxonomically diverse and can utilize lactate in different ways. Selective isolation on DL 105 lactate-containing media resulted in the recovery of Lachnospiraceae species subsequently 106 identified as Eubacterium hallii (since reclassified as the two species Anaerobutyricum hallii 107 and Anaerobutyricum soehngenii [19]), Anaerostipes hadrus and Anaerostipes caccae [20, 21].