METHAMPHETAMINE: FACT VS. FICTION AND LESSONS FROM THE CRACK HYSTERIA Carl L. Hart, Joanne Csete, Don Habibi Department of Psychology, Columbia University, Division on Substance Abuse, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Department of Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University, Institute for Research in African-American Studies, Columbia University, Open Society Foundation and Department of Philosophy, University of North Carolina Wilmington Address Correspondence to: Carl L. Hart, Ph.D. New York State Psychiatric Institute 1051 Riverside Dr., Unit 120 New York, NY 10032, U.S.A. Voice (212) 543-5884 FAX (212) 543-5991
[email protected] Hart: Methamphetamine dangers, 1 Executive Summary The purpose of this report is to provide a critical examination of the available evidence on illicit methamphetamine use and its consequences in the United States and internationally. It is the aim of this report to dispel some of the myths about the effects of methamphetamine and other illicit drugs using the best available scientific data. Further, it is our hope that this analysis will lead to more rational policies for dealing with both legal and illegal amphetamine. The report begins with an examination of the lessons learned from the “crack cocaine scare” in the 1980s. In this way, the reader can draw parallels between society’s response to crack cocaine then, and methamphetamine now. The report then describes distinctions and similarities between methamphetamine and other amphetamine-type stimulants. Also examined is the prevalence of methamphetamine use and public policies in response to the perceived increased use of the drug and perceived drug-related problems.