DOCSLIB.ORG

The Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017 Federal Aviation Administration The Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017 January 2017 Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017 i Contents About the FAA Office of Commercial Space Transportation The Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation (FAA AST) licenses and regulates U.S. commercial space launch and reentry activity, as well as the operation of non-federal launch and reentry sites, as authorized by Executive Order 12465 and Title 51 United States Code, Subtitle V, Chapter 509 (formerly the Commercial Space Launch Act). FAA AST’s mission is to ensure public health and safety and the safety of property while protecting the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States during commercial launch and reentry operations. In addition, FAA AST is directed to encourage, facilitate, and promote commercial space launches and reentries. Additional information concerning commercial space transportation can be found on FAA AST’s website: http://www.faa.gov/go/ast Cover art: Phil Smith, The Tauri Group (2017) Publication produced for FAA AST by The Tauri Group under contract. NOTICE Use of trade names or names of manufacturers in this document does not constitute an official endorsement of such products or manufacturers, either expressed or implied, by the Federal Aviation Administration. ii Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017 GENERAL CONTENTS Executive Summary 1 Introduction 5 Launch Vehicles 9 Launch and Reentry Sites 21 Payloads 35 2016 Launch Events 39 2017 Annual Commercial Space Transportation Forecast 45 Space Transportation Law and Policy 83 Appendices 89 Orbital Launch Vehicle Fact Sheets 100 iii Contents DETAILED CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . 1 INTRODUCTION . 5 THE SPACE TRANSPORTATION INDUSTRY . 9 THE SPACE INDUSTRY. .9 LAUNCH VEHICLES. 9 Typical Launch Vehicle Subsystems . 10 Launch Vehicle Integration and Processing . .14 Operational Orbital Launch Vehicles . 15 Operational Suborbital Launch Vehicles . .16 LAUNCH AND REENTRY SITES . 21 U.S. FEDERAL SITES. 23 FAA AST-LICENSED SITES . .25 NON-LICENSED U.S. SITES. 30 NON-U.S. SITES. 31 PAYLOADS . 35 STATE OF THE PAYLOAD INDUSTRY . 35 GLOBAL PAYLOAD INDUSTRY. 35 U.S. PAYLOAD INDUSTRY. 36 COMMERCIAL ON-ORBIT VEHICLES AND PLATFORMS. 36 2016 LAUNCH EVENTS . .. 39 2017 ANNUAL COMMERCIAL SPACE TRANSPORTATION FORECAST . 45 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. 45 METHODOLOGY. .49 COMMERCIAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS SATELLITES. .50 COMMERCIAL REMOTE SENSING SATELLITES . 63 COMMERCIAL CREW AND CARGO TRANSPORTATION SERVICES. 72 OTHER COMMERCIALLY LAUNCHED SATELLITES. 77 TECHNOLOGY TEST AND DEMONSTRATION LAUNCHES . 77 FACTORS THAT AFFECT LAUNCH PROJECTIONS. 78 SPACE TRANSPORTATION LAW AND POLICY . 83 CURRENT LAW AND POLICY. .83 International Treaties. .83 U.S. Law and Policy . 84 COMMERCIAL SPACE TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE (COMSTAC) . 86 Purpose, Scope, and 2016 Membership . 86 APPENDIX 1: DEFINITIONS AND ACRONYMS . 89 APPENDIX 2: 2016 WORLDWIDE ORBITAL LAUNCH EVENTS . 95 ORBITAL LAUNCH VEHICLE FACT SHEETS . 100 iv Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017 v Executive Summary EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The size of the global space industry, which combines satellite services and ground equipment, government space budgets, and global navigation satellite services (GNSS) equipment, is estimated to be about $335 billion. At $98 billion in revenues, or about 29 percent, satellite television represents the largest segment of activity. Following satellite television are services enabled by global navigation satellite systems (GNSS), which represent about $81 billion in revenues, or 24 percent. Government space budgets represent $77 billion, or 23 percent. Other satellite services (fixed and mobile satellite services, broadband, and remote sensing) generated about $30 billion in revenues, and ground equipment represents $28 billion in revenues. Satellite manufacturing generated nearly $17 billion. All of this activity would not be possible without orbital launch services. Global launch services is estimated to account for $5.4 billion of the $335 billion total, or only about 2 percent. Most of this launch activity is captive; that is, the majority of payload operators have existing agreements with launch service providers or do not otherwise “shop around” for a launch. About a third of the $5.4 billion represents internationally competed, or commercial, transactions. In 2016, service providers conducted a total of 85 orbital launches in seven countries. While this figure is elaborated upon in greater detail later in this report, there are some interesting events worthy of noting here. Since 2014, U.S. providers have begun to cut into the existing share of commercial launches occupied by Russian providers. This U.S. gain is the result of a combination of factors. An Orbital ATK Antares is prepared for the OA 5 cargo mission to the First, the entrance of International Space Station (ISS). (Source: NASA/Bill Ingalls) Space Exploration Technologies (SpaceX), which has been offering its Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy vehicles to the global market at low prices, is attracting significant business. In addition, launch failures, quality control problems, and supply chain issues have plagued the Russian space industry, leading some customers to seek alternatives like SpaceX. Meanwhile, Europe’s Arianespace remains a steadfast provider, offering reliable services via the Ariane 5 ECA, Soyuz 2, and Vega. Sea Launch, 1 Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017 for a time a key player but never a dominant one, has essentially ceased operations. Finally, Japan’s Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (MHI) Launch Services and India’s Antrix have become more aggressive at marketing their H-IIA/B and PSLV vehicles, respectively. Since about 2004, the annual number of orbital launches conducted worldwide has steadily increased. This increase has primarily been due to government activity outside the U.S., as U.S. government launches remain relatively steady. For example, retirement of the Space Shuttle in 2011 decreased the number of U.S. launches per year relative to the previous three decades. However, commercial cargo missions to the International Space Station (ISS) have helped to fill the resulting gap, along with anticipated commercial crew missions beginning in 2018. Perhaps the most notable in terms of government launch activity is China. The number of orbital launches conducted by China has steadily increased each year since 2010, with a peak of 22 launches in 2016. The China Great Wall Industry Corporation (CGWIC) has also been aggressively pursuing international clients via package deals that include satellite manufacturing and launch. These launches are not considered commercial since the launch contract is not internationally competed. In 2015, China introduced two new small-class launch vehicles, the Long March 6 and the Long March 11. In 2016, China successfully launched the Long March 5 and Long March 7, both of which were launched from a new launch site on Hainan Island. Finally, China’s human spaceflight program continues in a deliberate fashion, with the 2016 launch of its Tiangong 2 space station. The Chinese National Space Agency (CNSA) is also continuing to develop its robotic investigations of the Moon with plans for venturing further. These signs point to a robust future in Chinese spaceflight, expanding the Chinese slice of the pie. Meanwhile, the commercial launch pie has not grown significantly during the past decade; instead, the slices of the pie have changed size. Yet, there are signs the commercial launch pie may be expanding. Several new launch vehicles are being developed specifically to address what some believe Rocket Lab’s Electron is prepared for launch in 2017. (Source: is latent demand among small Rocket Lab) satellite operators. These vehicles are designed to launch payloads with masses under 500 kg (1,102 lb) to low Earth orbit (LEO). Though the price per kilogram remains high relative to larger vehicles, the value is in scheduling. Previously, these small satellites would routinely “piggyback” as a secondary payload on a launch carrying a much larger payload that would dictate the schedule and the orbital destination. Consequently, these new vehicles will give small satellite operators, especially those with constellations of many satellites, greater control over their business plans. Some of these new vehicles are in advanced stages of development, like the Electron by 2 Executive Summary Rocket Lab and LauncherOne from Virgin Galactic, with some expected to start launching payloads in 2017 and 2018. There are almost 50 proposed small launch vehicles being developed worldwide, though most are in conceptual stages. Two launch failures occurred in 2016. In August, a Long March 4C carrying a government-owned meteorological satellite called Gaofen 10 was destroyed late in the launch trajectory. The second launch failure took place in December, when a Soyuz U failed to deliver Progress MS-4 to the ISS. Only one Soyuz U remains to be launched; all further flights will take place using the upgraded Soyuz 2, which has been commercially available since 2004. There were some notable activities in 2016 relating to suborbital reusable vehicles. Blue Origin’s New Shepard vehicle successfully flew four times, launching from the company’s site in western Texas. The fourth flight, which took place on October 5, 2016, featured a test of a capsule abort and separation, and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Orbital Debris Quarterly News 22-1
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Orbital Debris Quarterly News Volume 22, Issue 1 February 2018 Inside... Two Anomalous Events in GEO Summer 2017 was marred by two apparently platform. Spacecraft dry mass is estimated to be on Space Debris Sensor anomalous events in the geosynchronous orbit the order of 2000 kg. On-board stored energy sources Launches Aboard (GEO) belt. Both incidents have been observed by include fuel and pressurized components, as well as the commercial space situation awareness providers, but as battery subsystem. SpaceX-13 2 of 26 December 2017 no debris from either event have The Indonesian GEO communications spacecraft entered the public catalog. TELKOM-1 (1999-042A, SSN catalog number 25880) SEM Analysis The GEO communications spacecraft AMC-9 experienced an energetic event on or about 25 August Results of (International Designator 2003-024A, U.S. Strategic 2017, after over 18.1 years on-orbit—3 years past Returned ISS Command [USSTRATCOM] Space Surveillance its nominal operational lifetime. An examination of Network [SSN] catalog number 27820), formerly known the Two Line Element data indicates an observable PMA-2 Cover 4 as GE-12, experienced an energetic event estimated to change in spacecraft orbit between 26 and 29 August. have occurred at approximately 07:10 GMT on 17 June At the beginning of this time interval, approximately CubeSat Study 2017, after approximately 14 years on-orbit. Fig. 1 Project Review 6 depicts the orbital evolution of the spacecraft in 2017. continued on page 2 SES, the spacecraft owner- operator, described this AMC‐9 (SSN 27820, 2003‐024A) 360 36300 Space Debris Sensor event as a “serious anomaly.” Installation 8 Following this event, the 36200 spacecraft began a westward 300 Monthly Object Type drift in the GEO belt.
    [Show full text]
  • APSCC Monthly E-Newsletter JANUARY 2017
    APSCC Monthly e-Newsletter JANUARY 2017 The Asia-Pacific Satellite Communications Council (APSCC) e-Newsletter is produced on a monthly basis as part of APSCC’s information services for members and professionals in the satellite industry. Subscribe to the APSCC monthly newsletter and be updated with the latest satellite industry news as well as APSCC activities! To renew your subscription, please visit www.apscc.or.kr/sub4_5.asp. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected] with a title “Unsubscribe.” News in this issue has been collected from 1 to 31 December 2016. INSIDE APSCC APSCC Session at PTC'17, What do End Users Actually Want? 16 January 2017, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, www.ptc.org/ptc17 While new technology is good, as are lower prices, are we actually meeting end user needs in the Pacific? Why/why not? What is being provisioned now and future? What gaps we must fill? Where does the satcom model fall short? The session, “What do End Users Actually Want?” would discuss end user needs across various applications and markets. Pierre-Jean Beylier, CEO, SpeedCast Richard Swardh, SVP, Comtech EF Data Imran Malik, RVP, O3b Networks Jacques-Samuel Prolon, General Manager, Kacific Broadband Satellites Moderated by Chris Baugh, President, NSR APSCC members can enjoy discounted rate when PTC’17 registration. Gregg Daffner Elected as APSCC President Gregg Daffner (CEO, GapSat) was elected and inaugurated as the President of APSCC at the 2016 APSCC General Assembly held on 13 December 2016. As the main representative of APSCC, Gregg will be responsible for setting the policies and goals of APSCC in consultation with the APSCC Board of Directors, Vice Presidents and Executive Director.
    [Show full text]
  • Spaceflight, Inc. General Payload Users Guide
    Spaceflight, Inc. SF‐2100‐PUG‐00001 Rev F 2015‐22‐15 Payload Users Guide Spaceflight, Inc. General Payload Users Guide 3415 S. 116th St, Suite 123 Tukwila, WA 98168 866.204.1707 spaceflightindustries.com i Spaceflight, Inc. SF‐2100‐PUG‐00001 Rev F 2015‐22‐15 Payload Users Guide Document Revision History Rev Approval Changes ECN No. Sections / Approved Pages CM Date A 2011‐09‐16 Initial Release Updated electrical interfaces and launch B 2012‐03‐30 environments C 2012‐07‐18 Official release Updated electrical interfaces and launch D 2013‐03‐05 environments, reformatted, and added to sections Updated organization and formatting, E 2014‐04‐15 added content on SHERPA, Mini‐SHERPA and ISS launches, updated RPA CG F 2015‐05‐22 Overall update ii Spaceflight, Inc. SF‐2100‐PUG‐00001 Rev F 2015‐22‐15 Payload Users Guide Table of Contents 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Document Overview ........................................................................................................................ 7 1.2 Spaceflight Overview ....................................................................................................................... 7 1.3 Hardware Overview ......................................................................................................................... 9 1.4 Mission Management Overview .................................................................................................... 10 2 Secondary
    [Show full text]
  • Techedsat Satellite Project Techedsat Formal Orbital Debris
    TechEdSat Satellite Project TES-03-XS008 Orbital Debris Assessment Report (ODAR) Rev A TechEdSat Formal Orbital Debris Assessment Report (ODAR) In accordance with NPR 8715.6A, this report is presented as compliance with the required reporting format per NASA-STD-8719.14, APPENDIX A. Report Version: A (4/2/2012) DAS Software Used in This Analysis: DAS v2.0 Page 1 of 34 TechEdSat Satellite Project TES-03-XS008 Orbital Debris Assessment Report (ODAR) Rev A Page 2 of 34 TechEdSat Satellite Project TES-03-XS008 Orbital Debris Assessment Report (ODAR) Rev A Record of Revisions Affected Description of Rev Date Author (s) Pages Change Ali Guarneros Luna, A 4/2/2012 All Initial Release Christopher Hartney, Page 3 of 34 TechEdSat Satellite Project TES-03-XS008 Orbital Debris Assessment Report (ODAR) Rev A Table of Contents Self-assessment and OSMA assessment of the ODAR using the format in Appendix A.2 of NASA-STD-8719.14: Assessment Report Format Mission Description ODAR Section 1: Program Management and Mission Overview ODAR Section 2: Spacecraft Description ODAR Section 3: Assessment of Spacecraft Debris Released during Normal Operations ODAR Section 4: Assessment of Spacecraft Intentional Breakups and Potential for Explosions. ODAR Section 5: Assessment of Spacecraft Potential for On-Orbit Collisions ODAR Section 6: Assessment of Spacecraft Postmission Disposal Plans and Procedures ODAR Section 7: Assessment of Spacecraft Reentry Hazards ODAR Section 8: Assessment for Tether Missions Appendix A: Acronyms Appendix B: Battery Data Sheet Appendix C: Wiring Schematics Page 4 of 34 TechEdSat Satellite Project TES-03-XS008 Orbital Debris Assessment Report (ODAR) Rev A Self­assessment and OSMA assessment of the ODAR using the format in Appendix A.2 of NASA­STD­8719.14: A self assessment is provided below in accordance with the assessment format provided in Appendix A.2 of NASA-STD-8719.14.
    [Show full text]
  • The Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2012
    Federal Aviation Administration The Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2012 February 2013 About FAA About the FAA Office of Commercial Space Transportation The Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation (FAA AST) licenses and regulates U.S. commercial space launch and reentry activity, as well as the operation of non-federal launch and reentry sites, as authorized by Executive Order 12465 and Title 51 United States Code, Subtitle V, Chapter 509 (formerly the Commercial Space Launch Act). FAA AST’s mission is to ensure public health and safety and the safety of property while protecting the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States during commercial launch and reentry operations. In addition, FAA AST is directed to encourage, facilitate, and promote commercial space launches and reentries. Additional information concerning commercial space transportation can be found on FAA AST’s website: http://www.faa.gov/go/ast Cover art: Phil Smith, The Tauri Group (2013) NOTICE Use of trade names or names of manufacturers in this document does not constitute an official endorsement of such products or manufacturers, either expressed or implied, by the Federal Aviation Administration. • i • Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation Dear Colleague, 2012 was a very active year for the entire commercial space industry. In addition to all of the dramatic space transportation events, including the first-ever commercial mission flown to and from the International Space Station, the year was also a very busy one from the government’s perspective. It is clear that the level and pace of activity is beginning to increase significantly.
    [Show full text]
  • January 2018 Satellite & Space Monthly Review
    February 5, 2018 Industry Brief Chris Quilty [email protected] January 2018 +1 (727)-828-7085 Austin Moeller Satellite & Space Monthly Review [email protected] +1 (727)-828-7601 January 11, 2018: Air force to utilize more smallsats for weather DMSP F19 Readying for Launch observation. Citing growing budget constraints, the US Air Force announced that is considering using small satellites in combination with next-gen software rather than procuring traditional multibillion-dollar, cost-plus spacecraft to replace/replenish its Defense Meteorological Satellite Program (DMSP). Despite awarding a $94 million contract to Ball Aerospace in November to design the Weather System Follow-on Microwave (WSF-M) satellite, the Air Force plans to begin launching small satellites equipped with infrared imaging and electro-optical instruments to monitor battlefield weather starting in 2021-2022. The Air Force is also considering augmenting their current capabilities with inactive NOAA GOES satellites in the near-term. These considerations parallel recent comments by USSTRATCOM commander Gen. John Hyten, who has repeatedly stated that the Air Force currently spends too much time and money developing large, high- cost satellites, and needs to invest in more small satellites for strategic Source: Lockheed Martin and budgetary reasons. Conclusion: Smallsats ready for a DoD growth spurt? With growing evidence of Russian/Chinese anti- satellite technology demonstrations, the Pentagon is becoming increasingly reluctant to spend billions of dollars on monolithic “Battlestar Galactica” satellite systems that place too many eggs in one basket. While not as robust or technologically-capable as high-end spacecraft built by traditional contractor, such as Lockheed Martin, small satellites are orders-of-magnitude less expensive to build, launch, and maintain.
    [Show full text]
  • Cubesat-Services.Pdf
    Space• Space Station Station Cubesat CubesatDeployment Services Deployment Services NanoRacks Cubesat Deployer (NRCSD) • 51.6 degree inclination, 385-400 KM • Orbit lifetime 8-12 months • Deployment typically 1-3 months after berthing • Soft stowage internal ride several times per year Photo credit: NASA NRCSD • Each NRCSD can deploy up to 6U of CubeSats • 8 NRCSD’s per airlock cycle, for a total of 48U deployment capability • ~2 Air Lock cycles per mission Photo Credit: NanoRacks LLC Photo credit: NASA 2. Launched by ISS visiting vehicle 3. NRCSDs installed by ISS Crew 5. Grapple by JRMS 4. JEM Air Lock depress & slide 6. NRCSDs positioned by JRMS table extension 1. NRCSDs transported in CTBs 7. Deploy 8. JRMS return NRCSD-MPEP stack to slide table; 9. ISS Crew un-install first 8 NRCSDs; repeat Slide table retracts and pressurizes JEM air lock install/deploy for second set of NRCSDs NanoRacks Cubesat Mission (NR-CM 3 ) • Orbital Sciences CRS-1 (Launched Jan. 9, 2014) • Planet Labs Flock1A, 28 Doves • Lithuanian Space Assoc., LitSat-1 • Vilnius University & NPO IEP, LituanicaSat-1 • Nanosatisfi, ArduSat-2 • Southern Stars, SkyCube • University of Peru, UAPSat-1 Photo credit: NASA Mission Highlights Most CubeSats launched Two countries attain in a single mission space-faring status World’s largest remote Kickstarter funding sensing constellation • NR-CM3 • Orbital Science CRS-1, Launch Jan 9, 2014 • Air Lock Cycle 1, Feb 11-15, 2014 Dove CubeSats • Deployers 1-8 (all Planet Labs Doves) Photo credit: NASA • NR-CM3 • Orbital Science CRS-1,
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin De Veille
    images/spatial.jpg Semaine 23 10/06/2017 Lancement réussi pour le lanceur GSLV-MKIII (100% indien) qui a été tiré depuis le pas de tir de Sriharijota et qui a placé le satellite GSAT-19 en orbite. http://information.tv5monde.com/en-continu/new-delhi-tire-une-nouvelle-fusee-100-indienne-173485 Le rapprochement entre Intelsat et Oneweb a échoué. http://www.air-cosmos.com/pas-de-mariage-entre-intelsat-et-oneweb-95805 Space X remporte un nouveau contrat et se chargera désormais de la mise en orbite du X37B. http://www.fredzone.org/x-37b-spacex-003 TAS signe un contrat de 130ME avec Inmarsat pour le développement d'Inmarsat GX. http://www.vipress.net/thales-alenia-space-signe-contrat-de-130-me-inmarsat/ La Chine développe des lanceurs réutilisables. http://french.china.org.cn/china/txt/2017-06/08/content_40992470.htm ILS Proton réussit le lancement du satellite EchoStar XXI depuis le cosmodrome de Baïkonour. http://www.ecranmobile.fr/ILS-Proton-reussit-le-lancement-du-satellite-EchoStar-XXI_a64266.html La capsule Dragon recyclée de Space X est bien arrivée à l'ISS. https://www.sciencesetavenir.fr/espace/systeme-solaire/spacex-la-premiere-capsule-dragon-recyclee-est-bien-arrivee-a-l-iss_113590 La NASA met le feu à une capsule Cygnus dans l'espace afin de préparer la sécurisation des futurs voyages sur Mars. http://kulturegeek.fr/news-112566/nasa-met-feu-capsule-cygnus-lespace-securiser-prochains-voyages-vers-mars Space X réutilise une fusée afin d'aller ravitailler l'ISS. http://www.la-croix.com/Sciences-et-ethique/Sciences/SpaceX-reutilise-fusee-aller-vers-station-spatiale-2017-06-05-1200852572 Elon Musk: réutiliser des fusées, cela commence à être normal.
    [Show full text]
  • Loral Space & Communications Inc
    Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 Form 10-K ☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020 OR ☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Commission file number 1-14180 LORAL SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS INC. (Exact name of registrant specified in its charter) Jurisdiction of incorporation: Delaware IRS identification number: 87-0748324 600 Fifth Avenue New York, New York 10020 Telephone: (212) 697-1105 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Trading Symbol Name of each exchange on which registered Common stock, $.01 par value LORL Nasdaq Global Select Market Preferred Stock Purchase Rights Nasdaq Global Select Market Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ◻ No ☒ Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ◻ No ☒ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ◻ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).
    [Show full text]
  • The Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017
    Federal Aviation Administration The Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017 January 2017 Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017 i Contents About the FAA Office of Commercial Space Transportation The Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation (FAA AST) licenses and regulates U.S. commercial space launch and reentry activity, as well as the operation of non-federal launch and reentry sites, as authorized by Executive Order 12465 and Title 51 United States Code, Subtitle V, Chapter 509 (formerly the Commercial Space Launch Act). FAA AST’s mission is to ensure public health and safety and the safety of property while protecting the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States during commercial launch and reentry operations. In addition, FAA AST is directed to encourage, facilitate, and promote commercial space launches and reentries. Additional information concerning commercial space transportation can be found on FAA AST’s website: http://www.faa.gov/go/ast Cover art: Phil Smith, The Tauri Group (2017) Publication produced for FAA AST by The Tauri Group under contract. NOTICE Use of trade names or names of manufacturers in this document does not constitute an official endorsement of such products or manufacturers, either expressed or implied, by the Federal Aviation Administration. ii Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017 GENERAL CONTENTS Executive Summary 1 Introduction 5 Launch Vehicles 9 Launch and Reentry Sites 21 Payloads 35 2016 Launch Events 39 2017 Annual Commercial Space Transportation Forecast 45 Space Transportation Law and Policy 83 Appendices 89 Orbital Launch Vehicle Fact Sheets 100 iii Contents DETAILED CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .
    [Show full text]
  • Eurospace Position Paper on Aggregation of European Institutional Launch Services
    Eurospace position paper on aggregation of European institutional launch services Preamble Space is a strategic and multifaceted tool in daily-life for European governments, businesses and citizens: indeed, space-based applications support major crisis management, economic growth, innovation, employment and information access, resulting in a significant benefit for people, growth, employment and innovation. In order to keep the European autonomous access to space, it is thus essential for Europe to maintain its global leadership throughout the entire value chain of the space sector. With 82 successful Ariane 5 flights in a row and 11 flawless Vega flights out of 11 attempts from the Guiana Space Center, the current ESA-developed European fleet of Launchers is characterized by an unprecedented, worldwide recognized reliability. Arianespace, the European Launch Service Provider, has got more than 40 years of experience and competence in this sector and can count on a highly competitive industrial base with skilled workforce and recognized high level of expertise and excellence. Nonetheless, the current worldwide scenario is being severely challenged by an aggressive competition and asymmetries in access to the market: in particular, the size of captive markets and pricing policies are different from one space power to the other, resulting in an unbearable competitive disadvantage for the European launcher industry. The aggregation of all European institutional launch services is needed in order to counter such distortions and move towards a level-playing field to the benefit of Europe developed launchers. The current scenario - Analysis of asymmetries Arianespace’s business model relies on a significant success in the commercial and foreign institutional launch market.
    [Show full text]
  • MIT Japan Program Working Paper 01.10 the GLOBAL COMMERCIAL
    MIT Japan Program Working Paper 01.10 THE GLOBAL COMMERCIAL SPACE LAUNCH INDUSTRY: JAPAN IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE Saadia M. Pekkanen Assistant Professor Department of Political Science Middlebury College Middlebury, VT 05753 [email protected] I am grateful to Marco Caceres, Senior Analyst and Director of Space Studies, Teal Group Corporation; Mark Coleman, Chemical Propulsion Information Agency (CPIA), Johns Hopkins University; and Takashi Ishii, General Manager, Space Division, The Society of Japanese Aerospace Companies (SJAC), Tokyo, for providing basic information concerning launch vehicles. I also thank Richard Samuels and Robert Pekkanen for their encouragement and comments. Finally, I thank Kartik Raj for his excellent research assistance. Financial suppport for the Japan portion of this project was provided graciously through a Postdoctoral Fellowship at the Harvard Academy of International and Area Studies. MIT Japan Program Working Paper Series 01.10 Center for International Studies Massachusetts Institute of Technology Room E38-7th Floor Cambridge, MA 02139 Phone: 617-252-1483 Fax: 617-258-7432 Date of Publication: July 16, 2001 © MIT Japan Program Introduction Japan has been seriously attempting to break into the commercial space launch vehicles industry since at least the mid 1970s. Yet very little is known about this story, and about the politics and perceptions that are continuing to drive Japanese efforts despite many outright failures in the indigenization of the industry. This story, therefore, is important not just because of the widespread economic and technological merits of the space launch vehicles sector which are considerable. It is also important because it speaks directly to the ongoing debates about the Japanese developmental state and, contrary to the new wisdom in light of Japan's recession, the continuation of its high technology policy as a whole.
    [Show full text]