DOCSLIB.ORG

The Council of Chalcedon and the Armenian Church

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Council of Chalcedon and the Armenian Church THE COUNCIL OF CHALCEDON AND THE ARMENIAN CHURCH KAREKIN SARKISSIAN Prelate, Armenian Apostolic Church of America A PUBLICATION OF The Armenian Church Prelacy NEW YORK Copyright© 1965 by Archbishop Karekin Sarkissian Preface to the Second Edition Copyright © 1975 by The Armenian Apostolic Church of America Ail rights reserved Printed in U.S.A. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Sarkissian, Karekin, Bp. The Council of Chalccdon and the Armenian Church. Bibliography: p. Includes indexes. i. Armenian Church. 2. Chalccdon, Council of, 451. I. Title. S25 1975 28i'.62 75-28381 To the beloved memory of His Holiness ZAREHI Catholicos of the Great House of Cilicia (1915-1963) In. humble recognition of his sacrifice for the Armenian Church and Nation CONTENTS page FOREWORD xi MAPS I Armenia in the fourth and fifth centuries xiv il Christianity in Syria and Mesopotamia in the fifth and sixth centuries xv EXPLANATORY NOTES xvii INTRODUCTION i The Problem and its Significance i n The Traditional View 6 in Recent Critical Approach 14 1. CHALCEDON AFTER CHALCEDON i Some Significant Aspects of the Council of Chalcedon 25 n Some Aspects of Post-Chalcedonian History 47 2. THE HISTORICAL BACKGROUND (i): The Political Situation 61 3. THE HISTORICAL BACKGROUND (2): The Ecclesiastical Situation Before the Council of Ephesus 75 i The First Four Centuries 76 n The First Three Decades of the Fourth Century 85 4. THE HISTORICAL BACKGROUND (3): The Ecclesiastical Situation between the Council of Ephesus and the Council of Chalcedon 111 5. THE HISTORICAL BACKGROUND (4) The Ecclesiastical Situation after the Council of Chalcedon 148 6. THE DOCTRINAL BACKGROUND 174 7- THE REJECTION OF THE COUNCIL OF CHALCEDON 196 Vlli CONTENTS EPILOGUE 214 ADDITIONAL NOTES 219 TRANSLITERATION SYSTEM 237 BIBLIOGRAPHICAL ABBREVIATIONS 238 INDEX OF PROPER NAMES 255 INDEX OF SUBJECTS 261 PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION The Prelacy of the Armenian Apostolic Church of America, East- ern Diocese, considers it important to publish a second edition of the scholarly work The Council of Chakedon and the Armenian Church, by Archbishop Karekin Sarkissian, Prelate of our Church. The book, originally published in London in 1965 by the So- ciety for Promoting Christian Knowledge (SPCK), has been out of print for the last four years. We arc very grateful to the SPCK for assigning the publication rights to us. The Council of Chakedon and the Armenian Church is widely- known in British theological circles and in Europe. It has been reviewed in many scholarly periodicals in more than eight lan- guages and is included in bibliographies of reference works on Armenia, on the Council of Chalccdon, and on Christology. Here in the United States, it deserves to be more widely circu- lated, for it has much to contribute, not only in Armenological circles but also in theological seminaries and universities, to a bet- ter understanding of the historical and doctrinal place of the Ar- menian Church in Christendom. For a variety of reasons, theo- logical and historical, the Armenian Church took the position of rejecting the Council of Chakedon. What were the significant stages in the process of that rejection? Where can one find accu- rate documentation of the issues? Archbishop Sarkissian deals with these questions ably and with scholarly thoroughness. His Grace also states very clearly the present-day relevance of the theme of his study, both in his own Foreword and in the Epilogue, "Looking Forward: Some Conclusions and Considerations." We would like to draw the reader's attention to two other ar- ticles which His Grace has published on the same issue: "The Ecumenical Problem in Eastern Christendom" (Ecumenical Review, the official quarterly of the World Council of Churches, ix X PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION Geneva, Switzerland, Vol. XII, No. 4, July 1960, pp. 436-454); and "The Doctrine of the Person of Christ in the Armenian Church" (Greek Orthodox Theological Review, published by the Holy Cross Theological Seminary, Brookline, Massachusetts, Vol. X, No. 2, Winter 1964-65, pp. 108-121). We recommend this volume and the articles just mentioned to everyone concerned with ecumenism, with Christianity, with the Armenian Church, and Armenian studies in general, in the sincere hope that this publication will serve the ecumenical cause and provide a better understanding of the Armenian Church. Executive Council Armenian Apostolic Church of America, Eastern Diocese New York, New York August 27, FOREWORD This book was written five years ago as a thesis for the degree of B. Litt. in the University of Oxford. The text has undergone no substantial change since then. The only addition has been the last chapter, in which I have tried to draw up certain conclusions with an ecumenical perspective and I have indicated some general lines for future studies concerning the historical and theological situations subsequent to and closely related to the period and the problems under study in this treatise. I need not emphasize the importance of a study treating the early christological controversies which have had a permanent effect on the Christian Churches, particularly in the East. In fact, the clash between the two main traditions of christological thinking in the early Church, usually described as the " Alexandrian and Antiochene Schools", interwoven as it was with other fac- tors of personal, ecclesiastical, and political nature, finally resulted after the Council of Chalcedon (A.D. 451) and particularly in the first half of the sixth century in the formation of two distinct, sep- arate groups of Churches within the fold of Eastern Christendom: the Chalcedonian Churches under the protection of the Byzantine Empire, and the anti-Chalcedonian Churches within or outside the Byzantine Empire with a strong tendency towards an independent status of life. The latter group of Churches, mistakenly and mis- leadingly often depicted as "Monophysite Churches"—i.e. the Syrian, Coptic, Ethiopian, and Armenian Churches—have con- tinuously maintained firm their doctrinal position throughout their history. The Churches of Byzantine tradition and origin have recognized them for many centuries as heretical or schis- matic Churches. But thanks to sincere and serious attempts made in mutual understanding and in an atmosphere free from polem- ical heat and historical prejudices many of the misunderstand- FOREWORD ings have fallen away. Owing to the present ecumenical spirit that breathes in the Christian Churches all over the world, these two groups of Churches have come to recognize their unity in faith in the very depth of their christological confession. Fears of heresy or alienation from Christian truth that lay behind the minds of the leading theological figures of these Churches have disappeared in the course of their long experience of Christian faith and life in history. Political and other related factors have disappeared equally. Recently, some positive signs are emerging with regard to the possibility of mutual understanding and re- covery of the lost sense and state of unity or communion. Thus, the study of the Council of Chalcedon has become an item of genuine interest at the present time. My sincere belief is that any objective and deep-searching inquiry into the history and theology of Chalcedon and post-Chalcedon may be a help towards a deeper understanding of the most essential area of our common heritage of Christian faith: christology. It is with this desire in heart and with this view in mind that I present this work to its readers, who will find a fuller presentation of the nature and the scope of this study in the Introduction that follows. Before concluding this brief word of opening, I should like to express my feelings of joy and gratitude in thanking many of my friends who in one way or another have helped towards the pre- paration and publication of this book. First of all, I should say a special word of thankful recognition in memory of my Super- visor, the Reverend C. S. C. Williams, the late Chaplain of Mer- ton College, Oxford, whose constant support and help have meant so much to me and have contributed so greatly to the improvement of my work. My hearty thanks are due also to the Right Rev- erend F. J. Taylor, Principal of Wycliffe Hall (now the Lord Bishop of Sheffield), who provided me with all the facilities for quiet study in Wycliffe Hall where I had the pleasure of sharing in the life of Anglican theological students for two years. I take much pleasure in thanking my examiners, the Reverend Dr H. Chadwick, Regius Professor of Divinity in Oxford University FOREWORD Xlll and Dr C. J. F. Dowsett, Lecturer in Armenian in the School of Oriental and African Studies of London University, who care- fully read the text and made valuable suggestions at the same time encouraging me to publish the work. Finally, it is with deep satisfaction and appreciation that I should like to express my thanks to the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation as well as to the Harold Buxton Trust for their generous financial contribution towards the publication of the book. KAREKIN SABKISSIAN Antelias, Lebanon, 2$ November 1964. XTv_ KEY ARMENIA X, ^^~^x^ IN THE y7^7y"V -*.The Line d fertitiwi (387-Sfl) 4T-HAND 5T-HCENTURIES r^J/GEORGlAX ^ \CASPIAN ^ABLACK SEA yf^^^0^ANKX, „ 7 ^V^^-c^i^-^AY ^ ^VCALBANIANS) Neocaesarea ] N"— -^^ f V d ^-— ^— ^ "S? V^-^_N X^^*^. PONTUS Vx-^\ Q\*- v, i ^ Sebastia J CAPPADOCiA"^*^ ,-^^ERV7:r^3?^ SIWNlv=v /-1 P^ORDANANI ^od^°P0^) S^ / f- / ^ \ U Agt|Sat X^ ^Manavazakart V /^ ^TBYZANTINEX^^^T J^L^r v^^—^XJ SEA .X (LATER RO'MAN)^^ JTW^-T^-TARON ^ cj-a*e ?*» I (^EMPIRE £>/V S ^2* C^X / y y AmdV? } -Arzan MOKK* >T 'CIUCIA/ X ^—4^ ARCRUNIK S ^ ^j^_ /T7^ — *te i 1 j S Lakevurmia -^Mopsuestia ^ — %/iamosata C \ / ^ ^^1-^-^ A«fO \A V^—, f^ -riir SYRIA A X N-sihi3 S x_S THE i OSROHENE Nls^X^ "^— ' CAOCAMIn rMD,Dr Antioch / ^^r 5ASSANID EMPInE V ^ / ? I Armenia in the fourth and fifth centuries.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fathers of the Church, Part 2: the Latin (Or Western) Fathers
    Fathers of the Church, Part 2: The Latin (or Western) Fathers A previous In Focus explored some of the great Fathers of the Eastern, or Greek, Church. This week the Latin (Western) Fathers are highlighted. While there is no official list of the Fathers, since the fifth century the criteria for selection has been that the individuals lived holy lives, were orthodox in their teachings and writings, lived during antiquity (the first through seventh centuries) and have been approved by the Church. According to some historians, there are more than 100 total Church Fathers (East and West); many of the same names are found on the different lists. The Fathers helped define, establish and promote the dogmas of the Catholic faith. They not only explained and advanced Christianity, but they stood against those who would defame, deny or exploit our Lord, Jesus Christ. This author is not able to adequately measure or describe the sanctity of these men, who were popes, bishops, theologians, apologists and writers. Some are saints, and all gave themselves in the service of the Lord. Here are a handful among the giants from the Western Church who have the title Church Father. They are categorized by those who lived just before the Council of Nicea, those in the era of Nicea and those after the council, up through the seventh century. Part one about the Greek (Eastern) Church Fathers was published Jan. 21 and can be found at: bit.ly/fatherspart1. Ante-Nicea Fathers Tertullian (c. 155-220) Tertullian Public domain The Fathers of the Western Church begin with Tertullian in the second century.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Times (A.D
    The Catholic Faith History of Catholicism A Brief History of Catholicism (Excerpts from Catholicism for Dummies) Ancient Times (A.D. 33-741) Non-Christian Rome (33-312) o The early Christians (mostly Jews who maintained their Jewish traditions) o Jerusalem’s religious establishment tolerated the early Christians as a fringe element of Judaism o Christianity splits into its own religion . Growing number of Gentile converts (outnumbered Jewish converts by the end of the first century) . Greek and Roman cultural influences were adapted into Christianity . Destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem in A.D. 70 (resulted in the final and formal expulsion of the Christians from Judaism) o The Roman persecutions . The first period (A.D. 68-117) – Emperor Nero blamed Christians for the burning of Rome . The second period (A.D. 117-192) – Emperors were less tyrannical and despotic but the persecutions were still promoted . The third period (A.D. 193-313) – Persecutions were the most virulent, violent, and atrocious during this period Christian Rome (313-475) o A.D. 286 Roman Empire split between East and West . Constantinople – formerly the city of Byzantium and now present- day Istanbul . Rome – declined in power and prestige during the barbarian invasions (A.D. 378-570) while the papacy emerged as the stable center of a chaotic world o Roman Emperor Constantine issued the Edict of Milan in A.D. 313 which legalized Christianity – it was no longer a capital crime to be Christian o A.D. 380 Christianity became the official state religion – Paganism was outlawed o The Christian Patriarchs (Jerusalem, Antioch, Alexandria, Rome, and Constantinople) .
    [Show full text]
  • Abraham (Hermit) 142F. Aristode 160 Acacius (Bishop Atarbius (Bishop Of
    INDEX Abraham (hermit) 142f. Aristode 160 Acacius (bishop Atarbius (bishop of Caesarea) 80f., 86f., of Neocaesarea) 109f., 127 91 Athanasius 63, 67ff., 75 Acacius (bishop Athanasius of Balad 156, 162 of Beroea) 142ff. Athenodorus (brother Aelianus 109 of Gregory al-Farabi 156 Thaumaturgus) 103, 105, Alexander (bishop 133 of Comana) I 26f., 129, Athens 120 132 Augustine 9-21, 70 Alexander (of the Cassiciacum Dialogues 9, 15ff. "Non-Sleepers" Corifessions 9-13, 15, monastery) 203, 211 18, 20f. Alexander (patriarch De beata vita 16ff. of Antioch) 144 De ordine 16ff. Alexander of Retractions 19 Abonoteichos 41 Soliloquies 19f. Alexander Severus Aurelian (emperor (emperor 222-235) 47 270-275) 121 Alexandria 37, 39f., 64, Auxentios 205 82, 101, 104, 120, Babai 172 n. II, 126f., 129 173ff. n. 92, 143, Babylas 70 156, 215 Baghdad 156 Alexandrian Christology 68 Bardesanism/Bardesanites 147 Amaseia 128 Barhadbeshabba 'Arbaya 145 Ambrose 70, 91 Barnabas 203 n. 39 Basil of Caeserea 109f., 117, Anastasios (monk) 207 121ff., 126f., Anastasius (= Magundat) 171 131, 157, Ancyra 113 166 Andrew Kalybites 207 Basilides 32, 37ff. Andrew the Fool 203 Beroea 141, 142 Annisa 112f. Berytus 101, 103f., Antioch 82, 105, 120 I I If., 155, 160, 215 Caesarea (Cappadocia) 129 Antiochene theology 72f., 143 Caesarea (Palestine) 80ff., 87, Antiochos the African 205 91, 92, 100, Antony 63,69f., 101, 103ff., 75f. 120 Antony / Antoninus Cappadocia 46ff., 53, (pupil of Lucian) 65 122 Apelles 51 Carpocrates 32, 39, 41 Arius/ Arianism/ Arians 65ff., 80ff., Carthage 47,49, 51, 92, 148 53ff., 57f. 224 INDEX Cataphrygian(s) 50ff., 56, 59 David of Thessalonike 205 Chaereas (comes) 140 Dcmosthenes (vicarius Chalcedon 75 of Pontica) III Chosroes II 17Iff., 175, Diogenes (bishop 177, I 79f., of Edessa) 144 182, 184, Dionysius (pope 259~269) 106 188 Doctrina Addai 91 n.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation of the Idea of Nestorian Crosses— Based on Fa Nixon's
    QUEST: Studies on Religion & Culture in Asia, Vol. 2, 2017 INVESTIGATION OF THE IDEA OF NESTORIAN CROSSES— BASED ON F. A. NIXON’S COLLECTION Chen, Jian Andrea Published online: 1 January 2017 ABSTRACT It is generally agreed that the study of the Nestorian Cross (a kind of bronze piece believed to be an early Chinese Christian relic), has great significance both for the developing study of Jingjiao and for ethnographic studies of the Nestorian Mongol people. The most important question that we should ask, however, is, “Are these so-called Nestorian Crosses part of the Mongolian Nestorian heritage?“ In other words, before starting to interpret the pieces in question, we need to ask if the identification, made at the first step of examination, is convincing enough as a basis upon which to build the interpretation. This paper focuses on issues concerning all aspects of the concept of Nestorian Crosses, looking first into the history of such an idea, then investigating its inner logic, and finally challenging its hard evidence. It is hoped that the conclusions of this paper will initiate a paradigm shift in the current study of this topic. Introduction to the Study The Jingjiao and the Yelikewen The name “Nestorian Crosses” clearly reveals that the religious dimension has been the primary consideration in the existing identification of these items, an identification which subsumes them as relics of Chinese Nestorianism, or more accurately, of the Jingjiao and the Yelikewen. Although controversies surround the identity of Nestorianism, the most commonly accepted description is as follows: At the Ephesus Council of 431 A.D., the Patriarch Nestorius was deemed heretical and his teaching anathematized due to his insistence that Mary should be called “Christotokos (Christ-bearer)” instead of “Theotokos (God-bearer).” This insistence is thought to emphasize a distinction between Christ’s divine and human natures instead of their unity.
    [Show full text]
  • YVES CONGAR's THEOLOGY of LAITY and MINISTRIES and ITS THEOLOGICAL RECEPTION in the UNITED STATES Dissertation Submitted to Th
    YVES CONGAR’S THEOLOGY OF LAITY AND MINISTRIES AND ITS THEOLOGICAL RECEPTION IN THE UNITED STATES Dissertation Submitted to The College of Arts and Sciences of the UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Theology By Alan D. Mostrom UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON Dayton, Ohio December 2018 YVES CONGAR’S THEOLOGY OF LAITY AND MINISTRIES AND ITS THEOLOGICAL RECEPTION IN THE UNITED STATES Name: Mostrom, Alan D. APPROVED BY: ___________________________________________ William L. Portier, Ph.D. Faculty Advisor ___________________________________________ Sandra A. Yocum, Ph.D. Faculty Reader ___________________________________________ Timothy R. Gabrielli, Ph.D. Outside Faculty Reader, Seton Hill University ___________________________________________ Dennis M. Doyle, Ph.D. Faculty Reader ___________________________________________ William H. Johnston, Ph.D. Faculty Reader ___________________________________________ Daniel S. Thompson, Ph.D. Chairperson ii © Copyright by Alan D. Mostrom All rights reserved 2018 iii ABSTRACT YVES CONGAR’S THEOLOGY OF LAITY AND MINISTRIES AND ITS THEOLOGICAL RECEPTION IN THE UNITED STATES Name: Mostrom, Alan D. University of Dayton Advisor: William L. Portier, Ph.D. Yves Congar’s theology of the laity and ministries is unified on the basis of his adaptation of Christ’s triplex munera to the laity and his specification of ministry as one aspect of the laity’s participation in Christ’s triplex munera. The seminal insight of Congar’s adaptation of the triplex munera is illumined by situating his work within his historical and ecclesiological context. The U.S. reception of Congar’s work on the laity and ministries, however, evinces that Congar’s principle insight has received a mixed reception by Catholic theologians in the United States due to their own historical context as well as their specific constructive theological concerns over the laity’s secularity, or the priority given to lay ministry over the notion of a laity.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Orthodox Ecclesiologies in the Era of Confessionalism Heith
    Eastern Orthodox Ecclesiologies in the Era of Confessionalism Heith-Stade, David Published in: Theoforum 2010 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Heith-Stade, D. (2010). Eastern Orthodox Ecclesiologies in the Era of Confessionalism. Theoforum, 41(3), 373- 385. https://www.academia.edu/1125117/Eastern_Orthodox_Ecclesiologies_in_the_Era_of_Confessionalism Total number of authors: 1 General rights Unless other specific re-use rights are stated the following general rights apply: Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Read more about Creative commons licenses: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. LUND UNIVERSITY PO Box 117 221 00 Lund +46 46-222 00 00 Theoþrum, 4l (2010), p. 37 3-385 Eastern Orthodox Ecclesiologies in the Era of Confessionalism "[I believeJ in one, holy, catholic and apostolic church." Creed -Nicaeno-Constantinopolitan DAVID HEITH-STADE Lund University, Sweden The Eastern Orthodox Church was a self-evident phenomenon in Byzantine society.
    [Show full text]
  • Nestorianism 1 Nestorianism
    Nestorianism 1 Nestorianism For the church sometimes known as the Nestorian Church, see Church of the East. "Nestorian" redirects here. For other uses, see Nestorian (disambiguation). Nestorianism is a Christological doctrine advanced by Nestorius, Patriarch of Constantinople from 428–431. The doctrine, which was informed by Nestorius' studies under Theodore of Mopsuestia at the School of Antioch, emphasizes the disunion between the human and divine natures of Jesus. Nestorius' teachings brought him into conflict with some other prominent church leaders, most notably Cyril of Alexandria, who criticized especially his rejection of the title Theotokos ("Bringer forth of God") for the Virgin Mary. Nestorius and his teachings were eventually condemned as heretical at the First Council of Ephesus in 431 and the Council of Chalcedon in 451, leading to the Nestorian Schism in which churches supporting Nestorius broke with the rest of the Christian Church. Afterward many of Nestorius' supporters relocated to Sassanid Persia, where they affiliated with the local Christian community, known as the Church of the East. Over the next decades the Church of the East became increasingly Nestorian in doctrine, leading it to be known alternately as the Nestorian Church. Nestorianism is a form of dyophysitism, and can be seen as the antithesis to monophysitism, which emerged in reaction to Nestorianism. Where Nestorianism holds that Christ had two loosely-united natures, divine and human, monophysitism holds that he had but a single nature, his human nature being absorbed into his divinity. A brief definition of Nestorian Christology can be given as: "Jesus Christ, who is not identical with the Son but personally united with the Son, who lives in him, is one hypostasis and one nature: human."[1] Both Nestorianism and monophysitism were condemned as heretical at the Council of Chalcedon.
    [Show full text]
  • Brief of Appellee, Protestant Episcopal Church in the Diocese of Virginia
    Record No. 120919 In the Supreme Court of Virginia The Falls Church (also known as The Church at the Falls – The Falls Church), Defendant-Appellant, v. The Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America and The Protestant Episcopal Church in the Diocese of Virginia, Plaintiffs-Appellees. BRIEF OF APPELLEE PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL CHURCH IN THE DIOCESE OF VIRGINIA Bradfute W. Davenport, Jr. (VSB #12848) Mary C. Zinsner (VSB #31397) [email protected] [email protected] George A. Somerville (VSB #22419) Troutman Sanders LLP [email protected] 1660 International Drive, Suite 600 Troutman Sanders LLP McLean, Virginia 22102 P.O. Box 1122 (703) 734-4334 (telephone) Richmond, Virginia 23218-1122 (703 734-4340 (facsimile) (804) 697-1291 (telephone) (804) 697-1339 (facsimile) CONTENTS Table of Authorities .................................................................................... iiii Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 Facts ........................................................................................................... 2 Assignment of Cross-Error .......................................................................... 5 Argument .................................................................................................... 5 Standard of Review ........................................................................... 5 I. The Circuit Court correctly followed and applied this Court’s
    [Show full text]
  • The Diocese of Minsk, Its Origin, Extent and Hierarchy
    177 The Diocese of Minsk, its Origin, Extent and Hierarchy BY Č. SIPOVIČ I Those who would wish to study the history of Christianity in Byelorussia should certainly pursue the history of the Orthodox and Catholic churches, and to a lesser extent, that of various groups of Protestants. One must bear in mind that the Catholic Church in Byelorussia followed and still follows two Rites: the Latin and the Oriental-Byzantine. It is acceptable to call the latter by the name Uniate. In Byelorussia it dates back to the Synod of Brest-Litoŭsk in the year 1596. But here we propose to deal exclusively with the Catholic Church of the Latin Rite, and will further limit ourselves to a small section of its history, namely the foundation of the diocese of Minsk. Something also will be said of its bishops and admin­ istrators. Exactly how and when the Latin form of Catholicism came to Byelorussia is a question which has not been sufficiently elucidated. Here then are the basic historical facts. From the beginning of the acceptance of Christianity in Byelo­ russia until the end of the 14th century, the population followed the Eastern Rite and until the end of the 12th century it formed part of the universal Christian Church. After the erection of a Latin bishopric in Vilna in 1387, and after the acceptance of Christianity in the Latin Rite by the Lithuanians, this episcopal see itself and its clergy started to propagate this rite. It is well-known that Jahajła had virtually the same relations with the pagan Lithuanians as with Orthodox Ukrainians and Byelo­ russians.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeology and History of Lydia from the Early Lydian Period to Late Antiquity (8Th Century B.C.-6Th Century A.D.)
    Dokuz Eylül University – DEU The Research Center for the Archaeology of Western Anatolia – EKVAM Colloquia Anatolica et Aegaea Congressus internationales Smyrnenses IX Archaeology and history of Lydia from the early Lydian period to late antiquity (8th century B.C.-6th century A.D.). An international symposium May 17-18, 2017 / Izmir, Turkey ABSTRACTS Edited by Ergün Laflı Gülseren Kan Şahin Last Update: 21/04/2017. Izmir, May 2017 Websites: https://independent.academia.edu/TheLydiaSymposium https://www.researchgate.net/profile/The_Lydia_Symposium 1 This symposium has been dedicated to Roberto Gusmani (1935-2009) and Peter Herrmann (1927-2002) due to their pioneering works on the archaeology and history of ancient Lydia. Fig. 1: Map of Lydia and neighbouring areas in western Asia Minor (S. Patacı, 2017). 2 Table of contents Ergün Laflı, An introduction to Lydian studies: Editorial remarks to the abstract booklet of the Lydia Symposium....................................................................................................................................................8-9. Nihal Akıllı, Protohistorical excavations at Hastane Höyük in Akhisar………………………………10. Sedat Akkurnaz, New examples of Archaic architectural terracottas from Lydia………………………..11. Gülseren Alkış Yazıcı, Some remarks on the ancient religions of Lydia……………………………….12. Elif Alten, Revolt of Achaeus against Antiochus III the Great and the siege of Sardis, based on classical textual, epigraphic and numismatic evidence………………………………………………………………....13. Gaetano Arena, Heleis: A chief doctor in Roman Lydia…….……………………………………....14. Ilias N. Arnaoutoglou, Κοινὸν, συμβίωσις: Associations in Hellenistic and Roman Lydia……….……..15. Eirini Artemi, The role of Ephesus in the late antiquity from the period of Diocletian to A.D. 449, the “Robber Synod”.……………………………………………………………………….………...16. Natalia S. Astashova, Anatolian pottery from Panticapaeum…………………………………….17-18. Ayşegül Aykurt, Minoan presence in western Anatolia……………………………………………...19.
    [Show full text]
  • Christianity In
    CHRISTIANITY IN THE CONTEMPORARY MIDDLE EAS Venue: Mathematical Institute Presentations & Speakers Andrew Wiles Building Welcome - Martin Ganeri. O.R Vice regent, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter Blackfriars Hall, Oxford Woodstock Road Christianity in the Middle East - an Oxford, 0X2 6GG introduction and Overview - Anthony O'Mahony, Heythrop College, University of London Fee for the day (payable by cheque): £20 Christianity in Iraq: present situation and Includes lunch, tea & coffee future challenge - Professor Herman TeuleT Concessions on application. University of Louvain and Director. Institute for Registration deadline: Friday 24th Eastern Christianity October 2014 Coptic Christianity in Egypt today: reconfiguring power, religion and politics- To request a registration form please Dr Mariz Tadros, University of Sussex email Charlotte Redman: Armenian Christianity in the Middle East - [email protected] modern history and contemporary challenges - Dr Hratch Tchilingirian, Armenian Conference hosted by the Las Casas Institute, Studies, Oriental Institute, University of Oxford Blackfriars Hall, Oxford Erasing the Ecumenical Patriarchate and the Greek Orthodox Christians in Turkey: «»pH^!^&£: Comparative lessons for Middle Eastern Christianity from the Turkish model of Religious Cleansing - Prof Elizabeth Prodrornou, Tufts University, Former Commissioner and vice-chair US Commission on International Religious freedom 2004-2012 & currently US Secretary of State Working Group on Religion and Foreign Policy Programme 'Christianity in
    [Show full text]
  • Publications 1427998433.Pdf
    THE CHURCH OF ARMENIA HISTORIOGRAPHY THEOLOGY ECCLESIOLOGY HISTORY ETHNOGRAPHY By Father Zaven Arzoumanian, PhD Columbia University Publication of the Western Diocese of the Armenian Church 2014 Cover painting by Hakob Gasparian 2 During the Pontificate of HIS HOLINESS KAREKIN II Supreme Patriarch and Catholicos of All Armenians By the Order of His Eminence ARCHBISHOP HOVNAN DERDERIAN Primate of the Western Diocese Of the Armenian Church of North America 3 To The Mgrublians And The Arzoumanians With Gratitude This publication sponsored by funds from family and friends on the occasion of the author’s birthday Special thanks to Yeretsgin Joyce Arzoumanian for her valuable assistance 4 To Archpriest Fr. Dr. Zaven Arzoumanian A merited Armenian clergyman Beloved Der Hayr, Your selfless pastoral service has become a beacon in the life of the Armenian Apostolic Church. Blessed are you for your sacrificial spirit and enduring love that you have so willfully offered for the betterment of the faithful community. You have shared the sacred vision of our Church fathers through your masterful and captivating writings. Your newest book titled “The Church of Armenia” offers the reader a complete historiographical, theological, ecclesiological, historical and ethnographical overview of the Armenian Apostolic Church. We pray to the Almighty God to grant you a long and a healthy life in order that you may continue to enrich the lives of the flock of Christ with renewed zeal and dedication. Prayerfully, Archbishop Hovnan Derderian Primate March 5, 2014 Burbank 5 PREFACE Specialized and diversified studies are included in this book from historiography to theology, and from ecclesiology to ethno- graphy, most of them little known to the public.
    [Show full text]