YVES CONGAR's THEOLOGY of LAITY and MINISTRIES and ITS THEOLOGICAL RECEPTION in the UNITED STATES Dissertation Submitted to Th

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

YVES CONGAR's THEOLOGY of LAITY and MINISTRIES and ITS THEOLOGICAL RECEPTION in the UNITED STATES Dissertation Submitted to Th YVES CONGAR’S THEOLOGY OF LAITY AND MINISTRIES AND ITS THEOLOGICAL RECEPTION IN THE UNITED STATES Dissertation Submitted to The College of Arts and Sciences of the UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Theology By Alan D. Mostrom UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON Dayton, Ohio December 2018 YVES CONGAR’S THEOLOGY OF LAITY AND MINISTRIES AND ITS THEOLOGICAL RECEPTION IN THE UNITED STATES Name: Mostrom, Alan D. APPROVED BY: ___________________________________________ William L. Portier, Ph.D. Faculty Advisor ___________________________________________ Sandra A. Yocum, Ph.D. Faculty Reader ___________________________________________ Timothy R. Gabrielli, Ph.D. Outside Faculty Reader, Seton Hill University ___________________________________________ Dennis M. Doyle, Ph.D. Faculty Reader ___________________________________________ William H. Johnston, Ph.D. Faculty Reader ___________________________________________ Daniel S. Thompson, Ph.D. Chairperson ii © Copyright by Alan D. Mostrom All rights reserved 2018 iii ABSTRACT YVES CONGAR’S THEOLOGY OF LAITY AND MINISTRIES AND ITS THEOLOGICAL RECEPTION IN THE UNITED STATES Name: Mostrom, Alan D. University of Dayton Advisor: William L. Portier, Ph.D. Yves Congar’s theology of the laity and ministries is unified on the basis of his adaptation of Christ’s triplex munera to the laity and his specification of ministry as one aspect of the laity’s participation in Christ’s triplex munera. The seminal insight of Congar’s adaptation of the triplex munera is illumined by situating his work within his historical and ecclesiological context. The U.S. reception of Congar’s work on the laity and ministries, however, evinces that Congar’s principle insight has received a mixed reception by Catholic theologians in the United States due to their own historical context as well as their specific constructive theological concerns over the laity’s secularity, or the priority given to lay ministry over the notion of a laity. Recovering the significance of the triplex munera for Congar’s theology of the laity and lay ministry provides U.S. Catholics opportunity for greater fusion of horizons and understanding of the intrinsic relationship between the laity’s secularity and their ecclesial ministries. iv DEDICATION for Sarah, “We blew up our TV, threw away our paper, Went to the country, built us a home, Had a lot of children, fed 'em on peaches, They all found Jesus on their own” - John Prine, “Spanish Pipedream” v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Finishing a dissertation is certainly a happy moment, especially since it provides the opportunity to recognize one’s debts to friends, mentors, and loved ones. The expressions of gratitude expressed below are only the beginning and do not exhaust my appreciation. First, I must show appreciation to Dr. William Portier for carefully guiding me through the process with his characteristic grace, insight, and friendship. A sincere gratitude is also due to my committee—Dr. Sandra Yocum, Dr. Dennis Doyle, Dr. William Johnston—for their patience and support throughout the process. A special thanks to my outside reader, Dr. Tim Gabrielli, for taking on the project on such short notice and providing useful feedback. My time at the University of Dayton has been acutely enriched by each of these scholars and mentors, and I am humbled and pleased by their interest in my project. I would like to thank my many colleagues and friends at the University of Dayton, with specific mention of Jason Heron, Christine Falk Dalessio, Anthony Rosselli, Ben Heidgerken, and Josh Brown. Your friendships make the work of theology inspiring and joyful. A singular thanks is owed to Dr. Matthew Levering for his constant support, willingness to mentor me as a young theologian, and profound example of a Thomist theologian. vi I would also like to acknowledge the generous support of the faculty, staff, and students of the Athenaeum of Ohio—especially Dr. Fr. Endres and Dr. Fr. Brausch—over the last year and a half. Teaching theology to seminarians for the sake of the New Evangelization has been the fulfillment of my theological and vocational dreams. I owe substantial thanks to the support and encouragement of my family of origin, specifically my parents Howard and Brenda and my brother Howard III, my sister-in-law Desiree, and my sister Tamiko. Special thanks to my in-laws Ed and Mary Powers, my sister-in-law Alexandra and brother-in-law Stephen, who have constantly supported my family throughout these years in graduate school and are excellent examples of Christian charity. The deepest gratitude is owed to Sarah, my intensely loving, gifted, and hard- working wife, and our perfectly delightful children: Lucy, Iris, David, Theresa, and Jacob. Your faith and love for our Lord and your ever-increasing charity toward me, despite my constant working, humble and inspire me to seek the face of Christ daily in prayer and study. “I thank my God every time I remember you, constantly praying with joy in every one of my prayers for all of you” (Phil. 1:3-4). Finally, all honor, praise, love, and glory are due to our great Lord and God, Jesus Christ, the eternal Son of the Father, who loved us first and gave himself for us. vii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ....................................................................................................................... iv DEDICATION .................................................................................................................... v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................... vi INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1 Gadamer, Reception Theory, and the ‘Fusion’ of Horizons ........................................... 2 Criteria for U.S. Theologians .......................................................................................... 4 Structure of Presentation ................................................................................................. 5 Chapter One: Congar’s Context .................................................................................. 5 Chapter Two: Congar’s Theology of the Laity: Jalons Pour Une Théologie Du Laïcat .......................................................................................................................... 5 Chapter Three: Congar’s Theology of the Laity after Jalons: Theology of Ministries and the Triplex Munera ............................................................................. 6 Chapter Four: Changing Contexts: An Interlude on the Conditions for Congar’s Reception in the United States .................................................................................... 6 Chapter Five: Philibert and Lakeland: Revitalization and Secularity of the Laity ..... 7 Chapter Six: O’Meara and Hahnenberg: Diverse and Relational Ministries over against ‘Laity’ and ‘Apostolate’ ................................................................................. 7 CHAPTER ONE ................................................................................................................. 9 CONGAR’S CONTEXT .................................................................................................... 9 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 9 Congar’s Adaptation of the Triplex Munera to the Laity in Light of the Social Anthropology of Pius XI ............................................................................................... 11 Modification of Catholic Action Theology of the Laity ............................................... 15 Pius XI’s Development of Social Munera as Significant Background to Congar’s Adaptation of the Triplex Munera ................................................................................ 18 “Munus/munera” in the Social Thought of Pius XI .................................................. 20 viii The Doctrinal Basis of the Lay Apostolate: The Power of the Sacramental Character as Source for Laity Obligation to participate in the Apostolate (especially Catholic Action) .......................................................................................................................... 40 Pius XII ..................................................................................................................... 40 Summary of the Definition of the Laity Prior to the founding of Catholic Action and Theologies of the Lay Apostolate ...................................................................... 41 The Layperson in the Pre-Conciliar Theologies of the Lay Apostolate ....................... 45 Luigi Civardi’s A Manual of Catholic Action (1943) .............................................. 45 Roland Fournier’s La Theologie de l’Action Catholique (1940).............................. 49 Theodore Hesburgh, C.S.C., The Theology of Catholic Action (1946) .................... 53 Conclusion .................................................................................................................... 58 CHAPTER TWO CONGAR’S THEOLOGY OF THE LAITY: JALONS POUR UNE THÉOLOGIE DU LAÏCAT ............................................................................................... 60 General Introduction to Jalons pour une théologie du laïcat: Historical and Theological Context .....................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • The Theology of the Lay Apostolate
    THE THEOLOGY OF THE LAY APOSTOLATE When Monsignor Murphy requested me to prepare this paper on the theology of the lay apostolate for the 19S9 convention of the Catholic Theological Society of America he indicated that the Com- mittee on Current Problems was interested in the topic in order that a course on the subject could be worked into the seminary frame- work. This seminar, therefore, has a twofold purpose: an inquiry into the theological problems of the lay apostolate and the more practical issue of the relationship of those questions to the seminary curriculum. In order that the second objective might be at least par- tially realized a letter was mailed to the major seminaries of the United States to determine the present status of the theology of the lay apostolate in the seminary course. Forty-five replies were re- ceived and the information can be summarized rather briefly. Nine- teen of the forty-five seminaries said that nothing or practically nothing was done. The remaining twenty-six all treated the topic in one way or another, either in elective seminars, special classes or lectures, in extra-curricular activities or in other classes. The most common method was to consider the lay apostolate in courses already in the curriculum, for example in Dogma (de Ecclesia, de Baptismo, de Confirmatione, de Verbo Incarnato), in Missiology, Pastoral Theology and Catechetics. In the last three cases the treatment tended to be more practical. Whether or not a special course should be introduced into the seminary is questionable. Those who expressed themselves on this point thought that the cur- riculum is already overcrowded and that seminarians have too little opportunity for individual study and reflection.
    [Show full text]
  • Opus Dei and Franco
    documentation INFORMATION OFFICE OF THE OPUS DEI PRELATURE IN BRITAIN 6 Orme Court, London W2 4RL - Tel: 020-7221 9176 - Fax: 020-7243 9400 - E-mail: [email protected] October 2001 OPUS DEI AND FRANCO Arguments and facts about a chapter in the history of Opus Dei about which a confused image has sometimes been presented Press cutting: Profile of Sr Antonio Fontán (from IPI Report, Columbia, MO, Second Quarter 2000) History texts: Brian Crozier (from Franco. A biographical history, London, 1967) Paul Preston (from Franco. A Biography, London, 1993) Background: Bishop Alvaro del Portillo on relations with the Franco regime (from Immersed in God, Princeton, NJ, 1994) Giuseppe Romano, Opus Dei and Franco (translation of Chapter 17 of: Vittorio Messori, Opus Dei: Un’indagine, Milan, 1994) Press cutting: Obituary of Sr Rafael Calvo Serer (from The Times, London, 21st April 1988) This Dossier has been prepared by the Information Office of Opus Dei in Britain. For more information visit the internet site http://www.opusdei.org.uk FOREWORD This special issue of Documentation aims to tackle the misconception that Opus Dei supported the regime of General Franco, who ruled Spain from 1939 to 1975. It is arguable that this prejudice is becoming less topical by the year, for various reasons; among others, Franco died over a quarter of a century ago. Furthermore, Opus Dei is a world-wide institution. However, the theme occasionally comes to the fore. One can still find articles in works of reference affirming that Opus Dei had political influence in Franco’s government, through the important posts occupied by its members.
    [Show full text]
  • To Revise Canon Law Code
    Pope appointscommission to reviseCanon Law Code Vr\'l'tCAN Cl'llY--llis llolitter;s Pope John XXlll has sct tup tr commissiou o{ 30 cnltlirtals lo levise the Corlc nf Canou Ltrrv. Anrong tlie 30 ale Caldinetl Irrancis Sipellman, Arch- bishop of Norv Yolli, ;rutl (iartlinal P:tul Legcr, Alchbishop of A'lotttt'citl. soon supcrscrlcd all eallicl col lcctions. Ry tlur beginning of tlre ?Oth ccntrrly carron larv rvas again in a statc ol' eonfusion. At thc Ii'ilsL Vatican f.louncil ( 186$.1870) con- tliliorrs harl I)l'cvonlr'(l thc 1l:rssing of disciplinar'1' larvs ol consitlcll- liou oI thc bislrops'rt'qrrcst Ior codilication of those allc;rtly irr I| RIGIII' SP0'I': fr'IEDICIA\II l0fcc, Itilt in lt)0.[ l'opc fit, l,ius X attuorrrrccrl lris dctcrnrinttion lo have a conrplete an<l olrlerlv corli[iciltion ol all cxisting ('hur.clr Indianapoliscivil la*'s, rights 'l'ltc rvith obsolt'tc lnd outrlalctl tasli ol' llrtt ttt'rr' ('()tlltllls- on(rs r,lirnirrntcrl arrrl othcr.s sion rlill l)('to glrtl)cr an(l pl'e- btrtugltt into t'onfolnritl' rvith palc nralclial lirr a rctisiott oi lltc tuodcln conrlilions. 6 canon larr, <:otlc accot'tling to thc rlilcclilr:s ol llto ct:tltttt'ttical cotttt- HE APPOINTED 'l'hc u t,unrrrrissiorr cil. t'evisiott rvill ;rp1rl1'ottl.t' rePorL ol calrlin:tls trrrrlcr ltis orvn and clrair.. good bad' ttttrt'itt [rrt'ttc itt tlttl to tltc cotlc nranship. ()n llalr:lr 25, 19().{,the Catlttt' l,atin lt itc. [,)nstct'tt Itite tvrrr'lrl's alchbi,slrops rvcle askctl g()\'ofttc(l lt1';t lics llr: sttllat'atc lo conlr'r' uith thcil sulfr.agan lroenle<l u itrtesses rltrlin;1 thc c0(l('.
    [Show full text]
  • Why We Sing What We Sing and Do What We Do at Mass Looking for Ways to ENGAGE Your Assembly?
    NATIONAL ASSOCIATION of PASTORAL MUSICIANS PASTORAL May 2010 Music Why We Sing What We Sing and Do What We Do at Mass Looking for ways to ENGAGE your assembly? ENGAGE UNITE OCP missals give you music known and loved by Catholics around the world, helping you connect with your parishioners and inspire your community. Discover how the right missal program can enhance INSPIRE your worship experience—Call us today! WORSHIP 1-866-728-2209 | ocp.org NPM-May2010:Layout 1 3/17/10 2:56 PM Page 1 Peter’s Way Tours Inc. Specializing in Custom Performance Tours and Pilgrimages Travel with the leader, as choirs have done for 25 years! Preview a Choir Tour! This could be ROME, FLORENCE, ASSISI, VATICAN CITY your choir in Rome! Roman Polyphony FEBRUARY 17 - 24, 2011 • $795 (plus tax) HOLY LAND - Songs of Scriptures FEBRUARY 24 - MARCH 5, 2011 • $1,095 (plus tax) IRELAND - Land of Saints and Scholars MARCH 1 - 7, 2011 • $995/$550* (plus tax) Continuing Education Programs for Music Directors Enjoy these specially designed programs at substantially reduced rates. Fully Refundable from New York when you return with your own choir! *Special Price by invitation to directors bringing their choir within 2 years. Visit us at Booth #100 at the NPM Convention in Detroit 500 North Broadway • Suite 221 • Jericho, NY 11753 New York Office: 1-800-225-7662 Special dinner with our American and Peter’s Way Tours Inc. EuropeanRequest Pueria brochure: Cantores [email protected] groups allowing for www.petersway.com or call Midwest Office: 1-800-443-6018 From the President Dear Members, fourth and fifth centuries, such as Ambrose, Augustine, Cyril of Jerusalem, and John Chrysostom.
    [Show full text]
  • The Virtue of Penance in the United States, 1955-1975
    THE VIRTUE OF PENANCE IN THE UNITED STATES, 1955-1975 Dissertation Submitted to The College of Arts and Sciences of the UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree Doctor of Philosophy in Theology By Maria Christina Morrow UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON Dayton, Ohio December 2013 THE VIRTUE OF PENANCE IN THE UNITED STATES, 1955-1975 Name: Morrow, Maria Christina APPROVED BY: _______________________________________ Sandra A. Yocum, Ph.D. Committee Chair _______________________________________ William L. Portier, Ph.D. Committee Member Mary Ann Spearin Chair in Catholic Theology _______________________________________ Kelly S. Johnson, Ph.D. Committee Member _______________________________________ Jana M. Bennett, Ph.D. Committee Member _______________________________________ William C. Mattison, III, Ph.D. Committee Member iii ABSTRACT THE VIRTUE OF PENANCE IN THE UNITED STATES, 1955-1975 Name: Morrow, Maria Christina University of Dayton Advisor: Dr. Sandra A. Yocum This dissertation examines the conception of sin and the practice of penance among Catholics in the United States from 1955 to 1975. It begins with a brief historical account of sin and penance in Christian history, indicating the long tradition of performing penitential acts in response to the identification of one’s self as a sinner. The dissertation then considers the Thomistic account of sin and the response of penance, which is understood both as a sacrament (which destroys the sin) and as a virtue (the acts of which constitute the matter of the sacrament but also extend to include non-sacramental acts). This serves to provide a framework for understanding the way Catholics in the United States identified sin and sought to amend for it by use of the sacrament of penance as well as non-sacramental penitential acts of the virtue of penance.
    [Show full text]
  • PAG. 3 / Attualita Ta Grave Questione Del Successore Di Papa Giovanni Roma
    FUnitd / giovedi 6 giugno 1963 PAG. 3 / attualita ta grave questione del successore di Papa Giovanni Roma il nuovo ILDEBRANDO ANTONIUTTI — d Spellman. E' considerate un • ron- zione statunltense dl Budapest dopo ITALIA Cardinale di curia. E' ritenuto un, calliano ». - --_., ^ <. la sua partecipazione alia rivolta del • moderate*, anche se intlmo di Ot­ 1956 contro il regime popolare. Non CLEMENTE MICARA — Cardinale taviani. E' nato a Nimis (Udine) ALBERT MEYER — Arcivescovo si sa se verra at Conclave. Sono not) di curia, Gran Cancelliere dell'Uni- nel 1898.' Per molti anni nunzio a d) Chicago. E' nato a Milxankee nel 1903. Membro di varie congregaziont. i recenti sondaggl della Santa Sede verslta lateranense. E* nato a Fra- Madrid; sostenuto dai cardinal! spa- per risotvere il suo caso. ficati nel 1879. Noto come • conserva- gnoli. JAMES MC. INTYRE — Arclve- tore >; ha perso molta dell'influenza EFREM FORNI — Cardinale di scovo di Los Angeles. E' nato a New che aveva sotto Pic XII. E' grave. York net 1886. Membro della con­ mente malato. , curia. E' nato a Milano net 1889. E' OLANDA stato nominate nel 1962. gregazione conclstoriale. GIUSEPPE PIZZARDO — Cardina­ JOSEPH RITTER — Arcivescovo BERNARD ALFRINK — Arcivesco­ le di curia, Prefetto delta Congrega- '« ALBERTO DI JORIO — Cardinale vo di Utrecht. Nato a Nljkeik nel di curia. E' nato a Roma nel 1884. di Saint Louis. E' nato a New Al­ zione dei seminar). E' nato a Savona bany nel 1892. 1900. Figura di punta degli innovator! nel 1877. SI e sempre situate all'estre. Fu segretario nel Conclave del 1958. sia nella rivendicazione dell'autono- ma destra anche nella Curia romana.
    [Show full text]
  • Lay Ministry Formation Program 2016-2017 Diocese of New Ulm
    Lay Ministry Formation Program 2016-2017 Diocese of New Ulm “The Risen Lord calls everyone to labor in his vineyard, that is, in a world that must be transformed in view of the final coming of the Reign of God; and the Holy Spirit empowers all with the various gifts and ministries for the building up of the Body of Christ.” Co-Workers in the Vineyard of the Lord Contact Information The Diocese of New Ulm 507-359-2966 Bishop John M. LeVoir: Lay Catholic have the responsibility by Baptism to: “Always be ready to give an explanation to anyone who asks you for a reason for your hope…” (1Peter 3:15). In the process of giving reasons for their hope, the laity evangelizes the culture. Lay Catholics are called to bring the gospel message of Jesus Christ to the public square. To a culture that increasingly tells us that there is no God and that religion is a private, personal mat- ter, we must answer in the negative. Instead, like the first Apostles, lay people are called to: “Go into the whole world and proclaim the gospel to every creature” (Mark 15:16). The Lay Ministry program prepares the laity to an- swer this call. Information includes: Overview of Programs 2016-2017 Together in Mission Information and Application Online Learning Undergraduate and Graduate Study Lay Ecclesial Ministry Certification Financial Support Overview: Foundations is a stand-alone year of training, but can also serve as the first of a two year program of training in missionary discipleship. The second year of training (which is open to all first year participants) is called Together in Mission.
    [Show full text]
  • PRESENTATION of the COMMUNIQUÉS of the GENERAL CHAPTER 1. from January
    [Translated from Original Spanish] Thy Kingdom Come! PRESENTATION OF THE COMMUNIQUÉS OF THE GENERAL CHAPTER 1. From January 8th through February 25th, 2014, the Extraordinary General Chapter of the Legion of Christ took place in Rome. His Eminence, Cardinal Velasio De Paolis, CS, and his two counselors, Fr. Gianfranco Ghirlanda, SJ, and Fr. Agostino Montan, CSI, presided. Sixty- one chapter fathers participated, 19 ex officio and 42 elected by the nine territories of the congregation and the centers of Rome. 2. This Extraordinary General Chapter marks the end of the journey of in-depth revision that the congregation has travelled since the apostolic visitation, which took place during 2009- 2010, and the naming of a Pontifical Delegate in the summer of 2010. Our principal tasks in the Chapter, as Pope Benedict XVI1 indicated and as Pope Francis confirmed2, were to revise the Constitutions and to elect a new central government for the congregation. 3. In the first days, in light of the reports that the Pontifical Delegate and the pro-General Director submitted, we focused on analyzing the life of the Congregation since the ordinary General Chapter that took place in 2005. One of the outcomes of the intense exchange of ideas that took place in those days was the communiqué that the Chapter approved on January 20th, 2014, about the journey of renewal of the Congregation. This same day, the elections of the new central government took place. Once the election had been confirmed and the Holy See made the two nominations that it had reserved to itself, the elections of Fr.
    [Show full text]
  • Pope Says Pastors Must 'Serve, Not Use' Laypeople
    Pope says pastors must ‘serve, not use’ laypeople By Cindy Wooden Catholic News Service VATICAN CITY – Clericalism is a danger to the Catholic Church not only because on a practical level it undermines the role of laity in society, but because theologically it “tends to diminish and undervalue the baptismal grace” of all believers, whether they are lay or clergy, Pope Francis said. “No one is baptized a priest or bishop,” the pope said in a letter to Cardinal Marc Ouellet, prefect of the Congregation for Bishops and president of the Pontifical Commission for Latin America. The fundamental consecration of all Christians occurs at baptism and is what unites all Christians in the call to holiness and witness. In the letter, released at the Vatican April 26, Pope Francis said he wanted to ensure that a discussion begun with members of the Pontifical Commission for Latin America March 4 “does not fall into a void.” The topic of the March discussion, he said, was on the public role of the laity in the life of the people of Latin America. In the letter, Pope Francis said that in lay Catholics’ work for the good of society and for justice, “it is not the pastor who must tell the layperson what to do and say, he already knows this and better than we do.” “It is illogical and even impossible to think that we, as pastors, should have a monopoly on the solutions for the multiple challenges that contemporary life presents,” he said. “On the contrary, we must stand alongside our people, accompany them in their search and stimulate their imagination in responding to current problems.” Pastors are not conceding anything to the laity by recognizing their role and potential in bringing the Gospel to the world; the laity are just as much members of “holy, faithful people of God” as the clergy, the pope said.
    [Show full text]
  • Heinonline (PDF)
    Citation: 99 Va. L. Rev. 917 2013 Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline (http://heinonline.org) Thu Jul 31 13:28:08 2014 -- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license agreement available at http://heinonline.org/HOL/License -- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text. -- To obtain permission to use this article beyond the scope of your HeinOnline license, please use: https://www.copyright.com/ccc/basicSearch.do? &operation=go&searchType=0 &lastSearch=simple&all=on&titleOrStdNo=0042-6601 VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW VOLUME 99 SEPTEMBER 2013 NUMBER 5 ARTICLES AGAINST RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONALISM Richard Schragger*and Micah Schwartzman** INTRODUCTION .................................................. 918 I. THE NEw RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONALISM .................... 922 A. Corporatism ........................... ...... 922 B. Neo-Medievalism .................................. 926 II. FOUR OBJECTIONS TO RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONALISM ..... ...... 932 A. Selective History ........................ ...... 932 B. Anti-Republican ........................................ 939 C. Unlimited Scope ..................................... 945 D. Not Unique.. ................................. 949 III. CHURCHES AS VOLUNTARY ASSOCIATIONS .......... ......... 956 A. Voluntarism. ................................. 957 B. Deriving CorporateRights ............. ................ 962 C. Is Religion Special? ..................... ....... 967 IV. TOWARDS A GENERAL THEORY OF CONSCIENTIOUS
    [Show full text]
  • Architects of Communion Guide for Parish Development
    • Architects of Communion Guide for Parish Development The Personal Ordinariate of the Chair of St. Peter 7730 Westview, Houston, Texas 77055 | 713.609.9292 www.ordinariate.net DECREE Whereas the Guide for Parish Development newly created for use in the Personal Ordinariate of the Chair of St. Peter provides an essential tool for evaluating the development of our communities from their earliest beginnings as groups in formation through to their canonical erection as Parishes; Whereas the Apostolic Constitution Anglicanorum coetibus established the Ordinariates for the purpose of unity and “organizing our lives around the Parish… [as] the principal indicator of our commitment to full communion”; Whereas the Guide was reviewed and amended by the Governing Council which, on May 9, 2016, approved it and recommended that it be promulgated throughout the Personal Ordinariate of the Chair of St. Peter; I therefore accept the text and promulgate the Guide for Parish Development for the Personal Ordinariate of the Chair of St. Peter as the evaluative instrument for guiding parochial development. Given in Houston, on this 31st day of May, in the year of Our Lord 2016, the Feast of the Visitation of the Blessed Virgin Mary. +STEVEN J. LOPES, STD Bishop of the Personal Ordinariate of the Chair of St. Peter The Personal Ordinariate of the Chair of St. Peter Architects of Communion Guide for Parish Development Introduction he clergy and faithful of the Ordinariate of the Chair of St. Peter are called to be architects of communion, simultaneously preserving the distinctiveness and integrity of their communities while demonstrating commitment to act in communion with the broader Church.
    [Show full text]
  • Dual Loyalty in a Different Key: JFK, Faith, and the Presidency Dr
    Dual Loyalty in a Different Key: JFK, Faith, and the Presidency Dr. Michael A. Helfand Monday, Aug. 16 at 7:00 PM EDT Course Description: What role should personal faith play in the decisions of government officials? In 1960, candidate John F. Kennedy delivered a speech seeking to allay fears that his Catholic faith would somehow impede his ability to serve as president. In so doing, Kennedy provided his own take on how faith and politics can run on separate tracks without influencing each other. But the speech, in many ways, raised more questions than answers. Should politicians adopt Kennedy’s approach and bracket faith off from their civic duties? Or are there alternative approaches to faith that both allow citizens to serve their country and still uphold core constitutional principles protecting the separation of church and state? In revisiting Kennedy’s speech, this class will explore these fundamental questions, thinking about how we as citizens, and as Jews, can respond to this core political challenge. Guiding Questions: 1. What role should religion play in government decision-making? 2. Should people of faith serve as government officials? Why? 3. Does faith enhance or undermine democratic norms? Why? “JFK’s Speech on His Religion” John F. Kennedy Watch the speech here: youtube.com/watch?v=zo5OwuryDfo 12 September 1960 Rev. Meza, Rev. Reck, I'm grateful for your generous invitation to speak my views. While the so-called religious issue is necessarily and properly the chief topic here tonight, I want to emphasize from the outset that we have far more critical issues to face in the 1960 election: the spread of Communist influence, until it now festers 90 miles off the coast of Florida; the humiliating treatment of our president and vice president by those who no longer respect our power; the hungry 1 of 4 tikvahonlineacademy.org/ children I saw in West Virginia; the old people who cannot pay their doctor bills; the families forced to give up their farms; an America with too many slums, with too few schools, and too late to the moon and outer space.
    [Show full text]