DOCSLIB.ORG

Afghanistan Annual Report on Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict: 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Afghanistan Annual Report on Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict: 2020 AFGHANISTAN ANNUAL REPORT ON PROTECTION OF CIVILIANS IN ARMED CONFLICT: 2020 AFGHANISTAN PROTECTION OF CIVILIANS IN ARMED CONFLICT ANNUAL REPORT 2020 FEBRUARY 2021 1 KABUL, AFGHANISTAN AFGHANISTAN ANNUAL REPORT ON PROTECTION OF CIVILIANS IN ARMED CONFLICT: 2020 This report and all Afghanistan Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict Reports referenced herein are available on the UNAMA website at: http://unama.unmissions.org/protection-of-civilians-reports Front cover: Three months after the start of the Afghanistan Peace Negotiations between the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan and the Taliban, an Afghan boy makes his way home through broken glass after rockets hit a resi- dential area in Kabul, Afghanistan on 12 December 2020. The Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant – Khorasan Province (ISIL-KP) claimed responsibility for the rocket attack which killed a civilian man and injured two others. ISIL-KP had also claimed responsibility for a rocket attack on Kabul less than a month earlier on 21 November that killed 10 civilians and injured 50 others. Photo © EPA-EFE / Hedayatullah Amid 2 AFGHANISTAN ANNUAL REPORT ON PROTECTION OF CIVILIANS IN ARMED CONFLICT: 2020 3 AFGHANISTAN ANNUAL REPORT ON PROTECTION OF CIVILIANS IN ARMED CONFLICT: 2020 Deborah Lyons, UN Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Afghanistan Kabul, Afghanistan February 2021 Michelle Bachelet, United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Geneva, Switzerland February 2021 4 AFGHANISTAN ANNUAL REPORT ON PROTECTION OF CIVILIANS IN ARMED CONFLICT: 2020 Mandate he 2020 Annual Report on the Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict in Afghanistan was prepared by the Human Rights Service of the United Na- T tions Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) and covers the period from 1 January to 31 December 2020. The UNAMA Human Rights Service prepared this report pursuant to the UNAMA mandate under United Nations Security Council Resolution 2543 (2020) “to mon- itor the situation of civilians, to coordinate efforts to ensure their protection, […] to promote accountability, […] and to assist in the full implementation of the fun- damental freedoms and human rights provisions of the Afghan Constitution and international treaties to which Afghanistan is a State party, in particular those re- garding the full enjoyment by women of their human rights.” Security Council Resolution 2543 (2020) recognizes the importance of ongoing monitoring and reporting to the Security Council on the situation of civilians in the armed conflict, particularly on civilian casualties. UNAMA undertakes a range of activities aimed at minimizing the impact of the armed conflict on civilians including: independent and impartial monitoring of incidents involving loss of life or injury to civilians; advocacy to strengthen pro- tection of civilians affected by the armed conflict; and initiatives to promote com- pliance among all parties to the conflict with international humanitarian law and international human rights law and the Constitution and laws of Afghanistan, in- cluding in particular respect for rights to life and physical integrity. This report received technical input from the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). 5 AFGHANISTAN ANNUAL REPORT ON PROTECTION OF CIVILIANS IN ARMED CONFLICT: 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS Methodology .............................................................................................................................................................................. 8 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................................. 11 Incident Types Causing Most Harm to Civilians ............................................................................................................................ 15 Attribution of Civilian Casualties to Parties to the Conflict .......................................................................................................... 17 Anti-Government Elements ..................................................................................................................................................... 17 Pro-Government Forces ........................................................................................................................................................... 19 Recommendations ................................................................................................................................................................... 20 I. Political and Security Dynamics Affecting Civilian Protection .......................................................................................... 23 II. Women and Armed Conflict ............................................................................................................................................. 26 III. Children and Armed Conflict ............................................................................................................................................ 30 Recruitment and Use of Children by Parties to the Armed Conflict .................................................................................... 33 Conflict-Related Sexual Violence Against Children .............................................................................................................. 35 Impact of the Armed Conflict on Healthcare ....................................................................................................................... 35 Impact of the Armed Conflict on Education ........................................................................................................................ 37 IV. Anti-Government Elements ......................................................................................................................................... 40 Overview .............................................................................................................................................................................. 40 1. The Taliban ...................................................................................................................................................................... 42 2. Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant – Khorasan Province .............................................................................................. 43 3. Undetermined Anti-Government Elements .................................................................................................................... 43 Incident Types Causing Most Harm to Civilians ................................................................................................................... 44 1. Suicide and non-suicide IEDs ........................................................................................................................................... 44 2. Attacks deliberately targeting civilians and civilian objects ............................................................................................ 51 3. Conflict-related abductions of civilians ........................................................................................................................... 58 4. Cruel, inhuman or degrading punishments and arbitrary deprivation of life ................................................................. 59 5. Placing civilians at risk: military use of homes and other civilian infrastructure, and instigation of risky acts ............... 59 V. Pro-Government Forces ................................................................................................................................................... 61 Overview .............................................................................................................................................................................. 61 1. Afghan national security forces ....................................................................................................................................... 63 2. International military forces ............................................................................................................................................ 65 3. Pro-government armed groups ....................................................................................................................................... 65 Incident Types Causing the Most Harm to Civilians ............................................................................................................. 66 1. Airstrikes .......................................................................................................................................................................... 66 2. Intentional harm to civilians, including summary executions ......................................................................................... 69 VI. Ground Engagements and Explosive Remnants of War ............................................................................................... 71 Ground Engagements: Civilians Caught in the Crossfire ...................................................................................................... 71 1. Indirect fire: artillery shells, mortars and rockets ........................................................................................................... 72 2. Civilian casualties from shooting during ground engagements .....................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Briefing Notes 17 July 2017
    Group 22 - Information Centre Asylum and Migration Briefing Notes 17 July 2017 Afghanistan Armed confrontations The fighting, purges, and raids by the security forces continue as well as the ambushes and attacks of the insurgents and sometimes also civilians are killed or injured. According to media reports the following provinces were affected in the last two weeks: Lagham, Kunar, Nangarhar (east), Kunduz, Baghlan (northeast), Kandahar, Helmand, Zabul, Uruzgan (south), Ghazni (southeast), Faryab (north), and Parwan (centre). The renewed outbreak of fighting in Kunduz (northeast) drove more than 350 families from their homes. Reportedly Afghan government forces reconquered Nawa district in Helmand (south). Already on 04 July 2017 the leader of the Afghan branch of IS, Abu Sayed, is said to have died in an air strike on the regional IS headquarters in Kunar (east). Assaults and attacks On 11 July 2017 a high ranking criminal police officer was assassinated by the Taliban in Logar (centre). In Kandahar (south) two children died in the explosion of a roadside bomb. On 12 July 2017 the Taliban stopped a bus in Farah province (west) and shot at least seven of the 16 passengers. On 13 July 2017 tribal elders from Faryab province (north) complained that members of the Afghan Local Police (ALP) had shot eleven civilians and burnt down their houses in Dawlatabad district. On 14 July 2017 seven civilians, including women and children, were injured in an attack in Jalalabad (Nangarhar province, east). Furthermore two civilians were shot, one of them was a reputed poet. It is reported that several children died in an air strike on their school in Kunduz (northeast) on 15 July 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Sunday, 06 October 2019 Venue: FAO Meeting Room Draft Agenda
    Time: 14:00 – 15:30 hrs Date: Sunday, 06 October 2019 Venue: FAO Meeting Room Draft Agenda: Introduction of ANDMA Nangarhar Newly appointed Director Update on the current humanitarian situation in Nurgal (Kunar) and Surkhrod (Nangarhar) – DoRR, OCHA Petition from Surkhrod for Tents and IDPs left of assessment Update on the status of Joint Needs Assessment & Response – OCHA and Partners Petitions for IDPs from Laghman AOB www.unocha.org The mission of the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) is to mobilize and coordinate effective and principled humanitarian action in partnership with national and international actors. Coordination Saves Lives Update on Assessment & Response on Natural disasters – as of 21 April 2019 - IOM & ANDMA Deaths In Responde Province Districts Affected & Initial Info. # of Families Agencies Agencies Response Assistance Action Points j Status Assessed Families ured Assessed Assessed Responde Provided Affected d d Nangarhar 250 (1817 9 5 250 and 105 IOM, IMC, IOM, Ongoing NFI, Tents, -Health MHT will be deployed Assessment individuals) Assessment ongoing WFP, SCI, effective 23 April 2019.4.22, completed in Lalpur, NCRO, Pending: food, Kama, Rodat, Behsud, OXFAM, -WASH cluster will reassess the Jalalabad city, Goshta, RRD, ARCS, needs and respond accordingly. Mohmandara, Kot, Bati DACAAR, Kot DAIL, DA -IOM to share the list of families recommended for permanent Assessment ongoing: shelter with ACTED. Shirzad, Dehbala, Pachir- Agam, -ANDMA will clarify the land Chaparhar,
    [Show full text]
  • Live News: a Survival Guide for Journalists
    AA SURVIVALSURVIVAL GUIDEGUIDE FORFOR JOURNALISTSJOURNALISTS LIVELIVE NEWSNEWS Front cover picture: A press photographer in a cloud of teargas during a riot in Lima, Peru, in May 2000. Photo: AP / Martin Mejia Title page picture (right) A newspaper vendor waits for customers in Abidjan, Ivory Coast, one of many countries where media have been put under threat. In November 2002, an emergency aid programme was launched by the IFJ, the Communication Assistance Foundation, International Media Support and Media Assistance International, working with the Union Nationale des Journalistes de Côte d'Ivoire (UNJCI) and the West Africa Journalists Association. The programme included training on safety and conflict reporting. Photo: AP / Clement Ntaye. LIVE NEWS A SURVIVAL GUIDE FOR JOURNALISTS Written and produced for the IFJ by Peter McIntyre Published by the International Federation of Journalists, Brussels March 2003 With the support of the European Initiative for Democracy and Human Rights. (i) Live News — A survival guide for journalists Published by the International Federation of Journalists March 2003. © International Federation of Journalists International Press Centre Residence Palace Rue de la Loi 155 B-1040 Brussels, Belgium ✆ +32 2 235 2200 http://www.ifj.org Editor in Chief Aidan White, General Secretary, IFJ Managing Editor Sarah de Jong, Human Rights Officer, IFJ [email protected] Projects Director Oliver Money-Kyrle Written and designed by Peter McIntyre, Oxford, UK [email protected] Acknowledgments The IFJ would like to thank: Associated Press Photos and Reuters, who donated the use of photos; AKE Ltd, Hereford, UK, for advice, information, facilities, and support; Mark Brayne (Dart Centre Europe) for advice on post trauma stress; Rodney Pinder, for comments on the drafts; All the journalists who contributed to, or were interviewed for, this book.
    [Show full text]
  • The ANSO Report (16-30 September 2010)
    The Afghanistan NGO Safety Office Issue: 58 16-30 September 2010 ANSO and our donors accept no liability for the results of any activity conducted or omitted on the basis of this report. THE ANSO REPORT -Not for copy or sale- Inside this Issue COUNTRY SUMMARY Central Region 2-7 The impact of the elections and Zabul while Ghazni of civilian casualties are 7-9 Western Region upon CENTRAL was lim- and Kandahar remained counter-productive to Northern Region 10-15 ited. Security forces claim extremely volatile. With AOG aims. Rather it is a that this calm was the result major operations now un- testament to AOG opera- Southern Region 16-20 of effective preventative derway in various parts of tional capacity which al- Eastern Region 20-23 measures, though this is Kandahar, movements of lowed them to achieve a unlikely the full cause. An IDPs are now taking place, maximum of effect 24 ANSO Info Page AOG attributed NGO ‘catch originating from the dis- (particularly on perceptions and release’ abduction in Ka- tricts of Zhari and Ar- of insecurity) for a mini- bul resulted from a case of ghandab into Kandahar mum of risk. YOU NEED TO KNOW mistaken identity. City. The operations are In the WEST, Badghis was The pace of NGO incidents unlikely to translate into the most affected by the • NGO abductions country- lasting security as AOG wide in the NORTH continues onset of the elections cycle, with abductions reported seem to have already recording a three fold in- • Ongoing destabilization of from Faryab and Baghlan.
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanistan 2015 Human Rights Report
    AFGHANISTAN 2015 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Afghanistan is an Islamic republic with a strong, directly elected presidency, a bicameral legislative branch, and a judicial branch. Presidential and provincial elections held in 2014 were marred by allegations of fraud that led to an audit of all ballot boxes. Protracted political negotiations between the presidential candidates led to the creation of a national unity government headed by President Ashraf Ghani, with runner-up Abdullah Abdullah assuming the newly created post of chief executive officer. Constitutionally mandated parliamentary elections did not take place during the year. The most recent parliamentary elections took place in 2010 and were marred by high levels of fraud and violence, according to domestic observers, the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, and other international election-monitoring organizations. Civilian authorities generally maintained control over the security forces, although there were occasions when security forces acted independently. The most significant human rights problems were widespread violence, including indiscriminate attacks on civilians by armed insurgent groups; armed insurgent groups’ killings of persons affiliated with the government; torture and abuse of detainees by government forces; widespread disregard for the rule of law and little accountability for those who committed human rights abuses; and targeted violence of and endemic societal discrimination against women and girls. Other human rights problems included
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanistan Weekly Field Report 10 December – 16 December 2018
    Afghanistan Weekly Field Report 10 December – 16 December 2018 Key issues in the past week: On 12 December, 2,100 people (300 families) were airlifted from Sar-e-Hawz villages of Pashtun-Kot to Maymana city. Based on initial reports, 15,200 people were displaced in the past week. A total of 325,200 people have been verified as displaced by conflict in 2018. 15,200 381,200 325,200 New IDPs reported People assisted in Total verified in the past week the past week IDPs in 2018 Provinces with conflict displacement in the past week, according to initial reports. Countrywide conflict displacement North and North East Region: A total of 325,200 people have been verified as being Thousands of families were reportedly displaced in displaced by conflict in 2018, according to OCHA’s Andkhoy district, Faryab province due to a major military Displacement Tracking System (DTS). Overall, the operation taking place in the area. On 12 December, number of people displaced so far this year is 36 per about 2,100 people (300 families) were airlifted from Sar- cent less than the same period last year (504,680). e-Hawz villages of Pashtun-Kot to Maymana city. The villages could not receive any food supplies as a result of Conflict Displacement Alerts closure of routes to the area by NSAGs. Alerts of conflict displacement are shared based on initial information received from the ground. Numbers can Drought change as more information becomes available. As part of the ongoing full-scale drought response, WFP Central Region: and its partners reached 286,900 drought-affected In Khost province, DoRR reported that about 5,600 people both in rural and urban areas of 11 provinces from people (800 families) were displaced from Sabari, Musa 6 – 12 December.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Sense of Daesh in Afghanistan: a Social Movement Perspective
    \ WORKING PAPER 6\ 2017 Making sense of Daesh in Afghanistan: A social movement perspective Katja Mielke \ BICC Nick Miszak \ TLO Joint publication by \ WORKING PAPER 6 \ 2017 MAKING SENSE OF DAESH IN AFGHANISTAN: A SOCIAL MOVEMENT PERSPECTIVE \ K. MIELKE & N. MISZAK SUMMARY So-called Islamic State (IS or Daesh) in Iraq and Syria is widely interpreted as a terrorist phenomenon. The proclamation in late January 2015 of a Wilayat Kho- rasan, which includes Afghanistan and Pakistan, as an IS branch is commonly interpreted as a manifestation of Daesh's global ambition to erect an Islamic caliphate. Its expansion implies hierarchical order, command structures and financial flows as well as a transnational mobility of fighters, arms and recruits between Syria and Iraq, on the one hand, and Afghanistan–Pakistan, on the other. In this Working Paper, we take a (new) social movement perspective to investigate the processes and underlying dynamics of Daesh’s emergence in different parts of the country. By employing social movement concepts, such as opportunity structures, coalition-building, resource mobilization and framing, we disentangle the different types of resource mobilization and long-term conflicts that have merged into the phenomenon of Daesh in Afghanistan. In dialogue with other approaches to terrorism studies as well as peace, civil war and security studies, our analysis focuses on relations and interactions among various actors in the Afghan-Pakistan region and their translocal networks. The insight builds on a ten-month fieldwork-based research project conducted in four regions—east, west, north-east and north Afghanistan—during 2016. We find that Daesh in Afghanistan is a context-specific phenomenon that manifests differently in the various regions across the country and is embedded in a long- term transformation of the religious, cultural and political landscape in the cross-border region of Afghanistan–Pakistan.
    [Show full text]
  • Positive Deviance Research Report Jan2014
    FutureGenerations Afghanistan . empowering communities to shape their futures ________________________________________________________________________________ Research Report Engaging Community Resilience for Security, Development and Peace building in Afghanistan ________________________________________________________________________________ December 2013 Funding Agencies United State Institute of Peace Rockefeller Brothers Fund Carnegie Corporation of New York Contact House # 115, 2nd Str., Parwan-2, Kabul, Afghanistan Cell: +93 (0) 799 686 618 / +93 (0) 707 270 778 Email: [email protected] Website: www.future.org 1 Engaging Community Resilience for Security, Development and Peacebuilding in Afghanistan Project Research Report Table of Contents List of Table List of Figures and Maps List of Abbreviations Glossary of local Language Words Chapter Title Page INTRODUCTION 3 Positive Deviance Process Conceptual Framework 4 • Phase-1: Inception • Phase-2: Positive Deviance Inquiry • Phase-3: Evaluation SECTION-1: Inception Phase Report 7 Chapter One POSITIVE DEVIANCE HISTORY AND DEFINITIONS 7 History 7 Definitions (PD concept, PD approach, PD inquiry, PD process, PD 8 methodology) a) Assessment Phase: Define, Determine, Discover 8 b) Application Phase: Design, Discern, Disseminate 9 Positive Deviance Principles 10 When to use positive deviance 10 Chapter Two RESEARCH CONTEXT 11 Challenges 11 Study Objectives 12 Site Selection 13 Research Methods 13 Composite Variables and Data Analysis 14 Scope and Limitation 15 Chapter Three SOCIO-POLITICAL
    [Show full text]
  • Watershed Atlas Part IV
    PART IV 99 DESCRIPTION PART IV OF WATERSHEDS I. MAP AND STATISTICS BY WATERSHED II. AMU DARYA RIVER BASIN III. NORTHERN RIVER BASIN IV. HARIROD-MURGHAB RIVER BASIN V. HILMAND RIVER BASIN VI. KABUL (INDUS) RIVER BASIN VII. NON-DRAINAGE AREAS PICTURE 84 Aerial view of Panjshir Valley in Spring 2003. Parwan, 25 March 2003 100 I. MAP AND STATISTICS BY WATERSHED Part IV of the Watershed Atlas describes the 41 watersheds Graphs 21-32 illustrate the main characteristics on area, popu- defined in Afghanistan, which includes five non-drainage areas lation and landcover of each watershed. Graph 21 shows that (Map 10 and 11). For each watershed, statistics on landcover the Upper Hilmand is the largest watershed in Afghanistan, are presented. These statistics were calculated based on the covering 46,882 sq. km, while the smallest watershed is the FAO 1990/93 landcover maps (Shapefiles), using Arc-View 3.2 Dasht-i Nawur, which covers 1,618 sq. km. Graph 22 shows that software. Graphs on monthly average river discharge curve the largest number of settlements is found in the Upper (long-term average and 1978) are also presented. The data Hilmand watershed. However, Graph 23 shows that the largest source for the hydrological graph is the Hydrological Year Books number of people is found in the Kabul, Sardih wa Ghazni, of the Government of Afghanistan – Ministry of Irrigation, Ghorband wa Panjshir (Shomali plain) and Balkhab watersheds. Water Resources and Environment (MIWRE). The data have Graph 24 shows that the highest population density by far is in been entered by Asian Development Bank and kindly made Kabul watershed, with 276 inhabitants/sq.
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict and Peacebuilding Observatory Nº 35 – November 2015
    Conflict and Peacebuilding Observatory Nº 35 – November 2015 WORSENING AFGHANISTAN: As the conflict rages, the Taliban split and Islamic State acquires new prominence US military sources announced the dismantling of what was probably al-Qaeda’s largest training camp. Located in the district of Shorabak in Kandahar province, the camp covered 77.7 km2. Losses of territory to the Taliban in some districts have been offset by gains in others. In Helmand, an offensive lasting several months pitted Afghan forces against the Taliban for control of the districts of Marjah and Nad-e-Ali, where over 200 Taliban and 85 soldiers were killed, according to the provincial government. In Kunduz, Afghan forces recovered a base in the district of Dasht-e-Archi, but lost a district in the province of Badakhshan. Government forces confirmed that alongside the Taliban, over 1,300 foreign insurgents (Pakistanis, Tajiks, Uyghurs and others) participated in the battle of Kunduz. Furthermore, in Nangarhar, where there is a group loyal to Islamic State, over 30 insurgents were killed in drone strikes. The local provincial government has stated that around 200 university students there are linked to Islamist groups. In fact, Islamic State banners were waved during an anti-government demonstration. In Zabul, Islamic State executed seven members of the Hazara (Shia) ethnic group that it abducted in September. Among them were three women, the first to be victims of beheading. Their families carried their bodies to Kabul, where they were joined by thousands of people (20,000 according to some media outlets) in one of the largest protests ever seen in the capital.
    [Show full text]
  • “Poppy Free” Provinces: a Measure Or a Target?
    Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit Case Study Series WATER MANAGEMENT, LIVESTOCK AND THE OPIUM ECONOMY “Poppy Free” Provinces: A Measure or a Target? This report is one of seven multi-site case studies undertaken during the second stage of AREU’s three-year study “Applied Thematic Research into Water Management, Livestock and the Opium Economy” (WOL). David Mansfield Funding for this research was provided by the European Commission. May 2009 Editor: Emily Winterbotham Layout: AREU Publications Team © 2009 Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, recording or otherwise without prior written permission of the publisher, the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit. Permission can be obtained by emailing [email protected] or by calling (+93)(0)799 608 548. “Poppy Free” Provinces: A Measure or a Target? About the Author David Mansfield is a specialist on development in drugs-producing environments. He has spent 17 years working in coca- and opium-producing countries, with over ten years experience conducting research into the role of opium in rural livelihood strategies in Afghanistan. About the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit The Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit (AREU) is an independent research organisation based in Kabul. AREU’s mission is to conduct high-quality research that informs and influences policy and practice. AREU also actively promotes a culture of research and learning by strengthening analytical capacity in Afghanistan and facilitating reflection and debate. Fundamental to AREU’s vision is that its work should improve Afghan lives.
    [Show full text]
  • "A New Stage of the Afghan Crisis and Tajikistan's Security"
    VALDAI DISCUSSION CLUB REPORT www.valdaiclub.com A NEW STAGE OF THE AFGHAN CRISIS AND TAJIKISTAN’S SECURITY Akbarsho Iskandarov, Kosimsho Iskandarov, Ivan Safranchuk MOSCOW, AUGUST 2016 Authors Akbarsho Iskandarov Doctor of Political Science, Deputy Chairman of the Supreme Soviet, Acting President of the Republic of Tajikistan (1990–1992); Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of the Republic of Tajikistan; Chief Research Fellow of A. Bahovaddinov Institute of Philosophy, Political Science and Law of the Academy of Science of the Republic of Tajikistan Kosimsho Iskandarov Doctor of Historical Science; Head of the Department of Iran and Afghanistan of the Rudaki Institute of Language, Literature, Oriental and Written Heritage of the Academy of Science of the Republic of Tajikistan Ivan Safranchuk PhD in Political Science; associate professor of the Department of Global Political Processes of the Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO-University) of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia; member of the Council on Foreign and Defense Policy The views and opinions expressed in this Report are those of the authors and do not represent the views of the Valdai Discussion Club, unless explicitly stated otherwise. Contents The growth of instability in northern Afghanistan and its causes ....................................................................3 Anti-government elements (AGE) in Afghan provinces bordering on Tajikistan .............................................5 Threats to Central Asian countries ........................................................................................................................7 Tajikistan’s approaches to defending itself from threats in the Afghan sector ........................................... 10 A NEW STAGE OF THE AFGHAN CRISIS AND TAJIKISTAN’S SECURITY The general situation in Afghanistan after two weeks of fierce fighting and not has been deteriorating during the last few before AGE carried out an orderly retreat.
    [Show full text]