DOCSLIB.ORG

Methodology in the Evolutionary Study of Art: Perspectives in Philosophical

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Supervisors: Prof. Dr. Steven Jacobs & Prof. Dr. Wilfried van Damme Dean: Prof. Dr. Marc Boone Rector: Prof. Dr. Anne De Paepe Nederlandstalige titel: Methodologie in de evolutionaire studie van kunst: perspectieven in filosofische antropologie, cognitieve archeologie, en evolutietheorie. Cover inspiration and images: Guthrie (2005) Cover design: Gitte Callaert Faculteit Letteren en Wijsbegeerte Eveline Seghers Methodology in the evolutionary study of art Perspectives in philosophical anthropology, cognitive archaeology, and evolutionary theory Proefschrift voorgelegd tot het behalen van de graad van Doctor in de Kunstwetenschappen 2015 Promotoren: Prof. Dr. Steven Jacobs & Prof. Dr. Wilfried van Damme Table of contents Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................... xii List of figures .............................................................................................................................. xv General introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 PART I - PHILOSOPHICAL ANTHROPOLOGY Introduction to Part I ................................................................................................................. 15 Chapter 1. Art and the evolutionary framework 1.1. Introduction ................................................................................................................... 19 1.2. The archaeological record for visual art ................................................................. 20 1.2.1. Human evolution and migratory patterns .................................................... 21 1.2.2. Classifying prehistoric art ................................................................................. 25 1.2.3. Ca. 50.000 - 10.000 BP ....................................................................................... 28 1.2.4. Ca. 100.000 - 50.000 BP ................................................................................... 46 1.2.5. Before ca. 100.000 BP ........................................................................................ 48 1.2.6. General issues with interpreting this record ................................................ 53 viii Table of contents 1.3. Connecting art and evolution .................................................................................... 57 1.3.1. Historical antecedents of current evolutionary research on art................ 57 1.3.2. Why use evolutionary theory to account for art? ........................................ 60 1.3.3. Mapping evolutionary hypotheses of art ....................................................... 62 1.4. Adaptationist thinking on visual art ....................................................................... 65 1.4.1. The artification hypothesis .............................................................................. 65 1.4.2. The aesthetic fitness indicator hypothesis .................................................... 71 1.4.3. The ancestress hypothesis .................................................................................. 82 1.4.4. The simulation hypothesis .............................................................................. 88 1.5. Byproduct views on visual art ..................................................................................... 94 1.5.1. The cheesecake hypothesis ................................................................................ 94 1.5.2. The sensory exploitation hypothesis .............................................................. 97 1.6. Gene-culture co-evolution and exaptation ...........................................................101 1.6.1. The indirect bias hypothesis ............................................................................101 1.7. Archaeology’s contribution to evolutionary thinking ...................................... 109 1.7.1. Cognitive fluidity ...............................................................................................110 1.7.2. Neurovisual resonance theory ........................................................................ 114 1.8. Evolutionary aesthetics ............................................................................................... 117 1.8.1. Aesthetics in evolutionary hypotheses of art ............................................... 117 1.8.2. Themes in evolutionary aesthetics ................................................................. 119 1.9. Visual art and the brain .............................................................................................. 121 1.9.1. Neuroarthistory and neuroaesthetics ............................................................ 121 1.9.2. The relevance of neuroscience for evolutionary hypotheses ................... 123 1.10. Concluding remarks ................................................................................................. 125 Chapter 2. Defining art in evolutionary research: conceptual and methodological considerations 2.1. Introduction ................................................................................................................. 127 2.2. The matter of defining art ....................................................................................... 128 2.3. Evolutionary attempts at defining art ................................................................... 130 2.3.1. Analytic confusion ............................................................................................ 130 2.3.2. Evolutionary approaches .................................................................................. 133 2.4. Whither art in evolutionary research? ................................................................... 138 2.4.1. First art and an evolutionary concept of art ............................................... 138 2.4.2. The matter of traits .......................................................................................... 139 Table of contents ix 2.4.3. Towards a pluralist view of art in evolutionary research......................... 142 2.5. Concluding remarks ................................................................................................. 144 Chapter 3. Cross-species comparison in the evolutionary study of art: a cognitive approach to the ape art debate 3.1. Introduction ................................................................................................................. 147 3.2. A history of the ape art debate ................................................................................. 148 3.3. Artistic cognition in the human species ................................................................. 153 3.3.1. Recognition of intentionality ......................................................................... 155 3.3.2. Symbolism .......................................................................................................... 156 3.3.3. Aesthetic sensitivity .......................................................................................... 156 3.4. But is it art? .................................................................................................................... 157 3.4.1. Recognition of intentionality ........................................................................ 157 3.4.2. Symbolism .......................................................................................................... 158 3.4.3. Aesthetic sensitivity ......................................................................................... 159 3.5. Discussion: the relevance of ape art for the evolution of art and an aesthetic sense among humans ......................................................................................................... 161 3.6. Concluding remarks .................................................................................................. 167 PART II - COGNITIVE ARCHAEOLOGY Introduction to Part II ............................................................................................................. 171 Chapter 4. Symbolism and the nature of art: the case of geometrically engraved artefacts 4.1. Introduction ................................................................................................................. 175 4.2. The behavioural modernity debate in Palaeolithic archaeology ................... 176 4.2.1. The nature of behavioural and cognitive modernity .............................. 176 4.2.2. Debating modernity ........................................................................................ 181 4.3. Symbolism and geometric mark-making: the burden of evidence ............... 188 4.3.1. The nature of symbolism in archaeological research ............................... 188 4.3.2. The objects of analysis and their primary interpretation ....................... 195 4.4. The argumentation assessed ................................................................................... 205 4.4.1. Eliminating other potential explanations ................................................ 205 4.4.2. Circumstantial evidence ............................................................................... 209 x Table of contents 4.4.3. Critical perspectives and alternative explanations ................................... 217 4.5. The behavioural modernity debate revisited ....................................................... 222 4.6. Concluding remarks ................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Art in the Stone Age Terminology

    Art in the Stone Age Terminology

    Art in the Stone Age Terminology ● Paleolithic- (Greek) ○ Paleo-Old ○ Lithos-Stone. ○ 40,000-9,000BCE ○ Characteristics, Hunter Gatherer, Caves. Migration ● Mesolithic, ○ Meso-Middle ○ Lithos- Stone Age ○ 10,000-5,000 bce ○ Characteristics, Beginnings of Cities, Dog Domestication, Transition to agricultural and animal domestication ● Neolithic, ○ Neo-New ○ Lithos-Stone ○ 8,000-2300 BCE ○ Development of Cities, Animal Husbandry Herding, Agriculture, People Began to stay in one place Mistakes in Art History The saying Goes.. “History is Written by the victors.” Niccolo Machiavelli Mercator Map Projection. https://youtu.be/KUF_Ckv8HbE http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo- way/2016/01/21/463835225/discovery-of- ancient-massacre-suggests-war-predated- settlements Radio Carbon Dating https://youtu.be/54e5Bz7m3do A process Archaeologists use among others to estimate how long ago an artifact was made. Makapansgat Face Pebble resembling a face, Makapansgat, ca. 3,000,000 bce. This pebble of one of the earliest examples of representation of the human form. Apollo 11 Cave Animal facing left, from the Apollo 11 Cave, Namibia, ca. 23,000bce. Charcoal on stone, 5”x4.25”. State Museum of Namibia, Windhoek. Scientists between 1969-1972 scientists working in the Apollo 11 Cave in Namibia found seven fragments of painted stone plaques, transportable. The approximate date of the charcoal from the archeological layer containing the Namibian plaques is 23,000bce. Hohlenstein-Stadel Human with feline (Lion?) head, from Hohlenstein-Stadel Germany, ca 40,000- 35,000BCE Appox 12” in length this artifact was carved from ivory from a mammoth tusk This object was originally thought to be of 30,000bce, was pushed back in time due to additional artifacts found later on the same excavation layer.
  • Experimentation Preceding Innovation in a MIS5 Pre-Still Bay Layer from Diepkloof Rock Shelter (South Africa): Emerging Technologies and Symbols

    Experimentation Preceding Innovation in a MIS5 Pre-Still Bay Layer from Diepkloof Rock Shelter (South Africa): Emerging Technologies and Symbols

    RESEARCH ARTICLE Experimentation preceding innovation in a MIS5 Pre-Still Bay layer from Diepkloof Rock Shelter (South Africa): emerging technologies and symbols. Guillaume Porraz1,2, John E. Parkington3, Patrick Schmidt4,5, Gérald Bereiziat6, Jean-Philip Brugal1, Laure Dayet7, Marina Igreja8, Christopher E. Miller9,10, Viola C. Schmid4,11, Chantal Tribolo12,, Aurore 4,2 13 1 Cite as: Porraz, G., Parkington, J. E., Val , Christine Verna , Pierre-Jean Texier Schmidt, P., Bereiziat, G., Brugal, J.- P., Dayet, L., Igreja, M., Miller, C. E., Schmid, V. C., Tribolo, C., Val, A., Verna, C., Texier, P.-J. (2020). 1 Experimentation preceding Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, Ministère de la Culture, UMR 7269 Lampea, 5 rue du Château innovation in a MIS5 Pre-Still Bay de l’Horloge, F-13094 Aix-en-Provence, France layer from Diepkloof Rock Shelter 2 University of the Witwatersrand, Evolutionary Studies Institute, Johannesburg, South Africa (South Africa): emerging 3 technologies and symbols. University of Cape Town, Department of Archaeology, Cape Town, South Africa EcoEvoRxiv, ch53r, ver. 3 peer- 4 Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Department of Early Prehistory and Quaternary reviewed and recommended by PCI Ecology, Schloss Hohentübingen, 72070 Tübingen, Germany Archaeology. doi: 5 10.32942/osf.io/ch53r Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Department of Geosciences, Applied Mineralogy, Wilhelmstraße 56, 72074 Tübingen, Germany. 6 Université de Bordeaux, UMR CNRS 5199 PACEA, F-33615 Pessac, France Posted: 2020-12-17 7 CNRS-Université Toulouse Jean Jaurès, UMR 5608 TRACES, F-31058 Toulouse, France 8 LARC DGPC, Ministry of Culture (Portugal) / ENVARCH Cibio-Inbio 9 Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Institute for Archaeological Sciences & Senckenberg Recommender: Anne Delagnes Center for Human Evolution and Paleoenvironment, Rümelinstr.
  • Palaeolithic Bone Retouchers from Belgium: a Preliminary­ Overview of the Recent Research Through Historic and Recently Excavated Bone Collections

    Palaeolithic Bone Retouchers from Belgium: a Preliminary­ Overview of the Recent Research Through Historic and Recently Excavated Bone Collections

    GRÉGORY ABRAMS PALAEOLITHIC BONE RETOUCHERS FROM BELGIUM: A PRE LIMINARY OVERVIEW OF THE RECENT RESEARCH THROUGH HISTORIC AND RECENTLY EXCAVATED BONE COLLECTIONS Abstract Since the first half of the 19th century, Belgium has provided a multitude of sites dating back to the Palaeo- lithic. These discoveries have contributed to the definition of the Palaeolithic and to the understanding of prehistoric people. This long tradition of research has resulted in the collection of thousands of bones that are increasingly the subject of extensive analysis, including the study of bone retouchers. At present, this re- search has identified 535 retouchers in various Belgian repositories. The tools come from different sites with highly variable and incomplete contextual information depending on their excavation history (e.g., Trou du Diable and the Caves of Goyet). In contrast, unit 5 of Scladina Cave constitutes a well-defined assemblage. Bones with fresh fracture patterns provide interesting technological data, such as a refitted cave bear femo- ral shaft that includes four retouchers. The use of cave bear bones for producing tools at Scladina Cave as well as retouchers made from Neanderthal remains from the 3rd Cave of Goyet gives rise to questions about the possible symbolic meanings attributed to particular species. Keywords Belgium; Middle Palaeolithic; Retouchers; Neanderthals; Cave bear; Refitting Introduction Belgian Palaeolithic research has its roots deep in ness of cave sites was such that most were explored the first half of the 19th century with the work of during the 19th century. Philippe-Charles Schmerling, who found the first Since the beginning of research into Belgian Neander thal remains in Engis Cave in the early prehistory, archaeologists have focused their atten- 1830s.
  • Un Origen En La Fenomenología Del Habitar a Partir De La Representación Simbólica Del Espacio

    Un Origen En La Fenomenología Del Habitar a Partir De La Representación Simbólica Del Espacio

    58 Un origen en la fenomenología del habitar a partir de la representación simbólica del espacio doi: 10.33264/rpa.201802-06 Rodrigo Gandolfi Orrego Escuela de Arquitectura Facultad de Arquitectura, Diseño y Artes Visuales Resumen El texto a continuación, busca profundizar sobre aquellos elementos originales que habrían motivado al individuo, a la adaptación de su entorno como estrategia de representación simbólica, la que alcanzará con el desarrollo de una concepción fenomenológica del espacio y el tiempo, y cuyo origen aparecerá junto a su anhelo de protección y su voluntad para organizar sus hábitos, modos de convivencia y comunicación. A partir de su experiencia del mundo, será capaz de trasladar aquellas vivencias al interior de su morada, concibiendo por vez primera, aquella unión entre exterior e interior como posibilidad de representación de su mundo interior reconociendo los fenómenos que lo rodean. De este modo, aparecerá la posibilidad de reparar aquella brecha existencial impuesta por la distancia espacial y temporal que lo separa de la realidad, o aquello que le resulta inalcanzable y doloroso. La caverna, específicamente sus paredes, constituyen los límites de aquella primera morada donde se configura la escena a través de la cual será capaz de representar su propio mundo interior-exterior como unidad indivisible y posibilidad de trascendencia simbólica que le permitirá concebir su presencia armónica en el cosmos. Palabras clave: arte rupestre, arquitectura, simbolismo, fenomenología, habitar, representación simbólica, Platón, Sigfried Giedion, mito de la caverna. Abstract The following text, seeks to deepen on those original elements that could have motivated the individual, to adapt their environment as a strategy of symbolic representation, which will be achieved with the development of a phenomenological conception of space and time, and whose origin appears together with its desire for protection and willingness to organize their habits, their ways of living together and communication, from their own worldview.
  • Mladopaleolitické Skalní Umění Tomáš Tesařík

    Mladopaleolitické Skalní Umění Tomáš Tesařík

    Západočeská univerzita v Plzni Fakulta filozofická Bakalářská práce Mladopaleolitické skalní umění Tomáš Tesařík Plzeň 2019 Západočeská univerzita v Plzni Fakulta filozofická Katedra archeologie Studijní program Archeologie Studijní obor Archeologie Bakalářská práce Mladopaleolitické skalní umění Tomáš Tesařík Vedoucí práce: Mgr. Luboš Chroustovský, Ph.D. Katedra archeologie Fakulta filozofická Západočeské univerzity v Plzni Plzeň 2019 Prohlašuji, že jsem práci zpracoval samostatně a použil jen uvedených pramenů a literatury. Plzeň, duben 2019 ……………………… Poděkování: Rád bych poděkoval vedoucímu práce Mgr. Lubošovi Chroustovskému, Ph. D. za pomoc, odborné rady a poskytnutí cenných připomínek k vypracování této bakalářské práce. Dále děkuji své rodině a přátelům za velkou podporu a trpělivost. Obsah 1. Úvod .............................................................................................................. 1 2. Význam pojmu skalní umění ......................................................................... 2 3. Dějiny bádání ................................................................................................. 4 3.1. Umění pro umění .................................................................................... 4 3.2. Lovecká magie a totemismus ................................................................. 4 3.3. Strukturalismus ....................................................................................... 5 3.4. Období druhé poloviny 20. století ..........................................................
  • Response to Government Consultation on Banning Uk Ivory Sales, Opened on 6 October 2017

    Response to Government Consultation on Banning Uk Ivory Sales, Opened on 6 October 2017

    Response to consultation: 24 December 2017 RESPONSE TO GOVERNMENT CONSULTATION ON BANNING UK IVORY SALES, OPENED ON 6 OCTOBER 2017 DATE OF RESPONSE: 24 DECEMBER 2017 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Submitted on behalf of: THE ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY UK (EIA) STOP IVORY THE DAVID SHEPHERD WILDLIFE FOUNDATION (DSWF) THE WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY (WCS) THE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF LONDON (ZSL) The following organisations have submitted their own individual responses to the consultation but also endorse the contents of this document: BORN FREE FOUNDATION NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL TUSK TRUST 1 Response to consultation: 24 December 2017 GLOSSARY BADA: British Antiques Dealers Association Consultation Document: The consultation document accompanying this consultation, issued by DEFRA in October 2017 CEMA: Customs and Excise Management Act 1979 CITES: Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora COTES Regulations: Control of Trade in Endangered Species (Enforcement) Regulations 1997 Evidence Document: The document setting out further detail to support this response. Export: Includes what are often referred to as ‘(re)exports’, which are the export out of the UK (or any other country) of ivory that had been previously been imported into the country IFAW: International Fund for Animal Welfare Impact Assessment: The impact assessment accompanying this consultation, issued by DEFRA dated 05/09/2017 IUCN: International Union
  • European Culture

    European Culture

    EUROPEAN CULTURE SIMEON IGNATOV - 9-TH GRADE FOREIGN LANGUAGE SCHOOL PLEVEN, BULGARIA DEFINITION • The culture of Europe is rooted in the art, architecture, film, different types of music, economic, literature, and philosophy that originated from the continent of Europe. European culture is largely rooted in what is often referred to as its "common cultural heritage”. • Because of the great number of perspectives which can be taken on the subject, it is impossible to form a single, all-embracing conception of European culture. Nonetheless, there are core elements which are generally agreed upon as forming the cultural foundation of modern Europe. One list of these elements given by K. Bochmann includes:] PREHISTORIC ART • Surviving European prehistoric art mainly comprises sculpture and rock art. It includes the oldest known representation of the human body, the Venus of Hohle Fel, dating from 40,000-35,000 BC, found in Schelklingen, Germany and the Löwenmensch figurine, from about 30,000 BC, the oldest undisputed piece of figurative art. The Swimming Reindeer of about 11,000 BCE is among the finest Magdalenian carvings in bone or antler of animals in the art of the Upper Paleolithic. At the beginning of the Mesolithic in Europe figurative sculpture greatly reduced, and remained a less common element in art than relief decoration of practical objects until the Roman period, despite some works such as the Gundestrup cauldron from the European Iron Age and the Bronze Age Trundholm sun chariot. MEDIEVAL ART • Medieval art can be broadly categorised into the Byzantine art of the Eastern Roman Empire, and the Gothic art that emerged in Western Europe over the same period.Byzantine art was strongly influenced by its classical heritage, but distinguished itself by the development of a new, abstract, aesthetic, marked by anti-naturalism and a favour for symbolism.
  • 5 Years on Ice Age Europe Network Celebrates – Page 5

    5 Years on Ice Age Europe Network Celebrates – Page 5

    network of heritage sites Magazine Issue 2 aPriL 2018 neanderthal rock art Latest research from spanish caves – page 6 Underground theatre British cave balances performances with conservation – page 16 Caves with ice age art get UnesCo Label germany’s swabian Jura awarded world heritage status – page 40 5 Years On ice age europe network celebrates – page 5 tewww.ice-age-europe.euLLING the STORY of iCe AGE PeoPLe in eUROPe anD eXPL ORING PLEISTOCene CULtURAL HERITAGE IntrOductIOn network of heritage sites welcome to the second edition of the ice age europe magazine! Ice Age europe Magazine – issue 2/2018 issn 2568­4353 after the successful launch last year we are happy to present editorial board the new issue, which is again brimming with exciting contri­ katrin hieke, gerd­Christian weniger, nick Powe butions. the magazine showcases the many activities taking Publication editing place in research and conservation, exhibition, education and katrin hieke communication at each of the ice age europe member sites. Layout and design Brightsea Creative, exeter, Uk; in addition, we are pleased to present two special guest Beate tebartz grafik Design, Düsseldorf, germany contributions: the first by Paul Pettitt, University of Durham, cover photo gives a brief overview of a groundbreaking discovery, which fashionable little sapiens © fumane Cave proved in february 2018 that the neanderthals were the first Inside front cover photo cave artists before modern humans. the second by nuria sanz, water bird – hohle fels © urmu, director of UnesCo in Mexico and general coor­­­di nator of the Photo: burkert ideenreich heaDs programme, reports on the new initiative for a serial transnational nomination of neanderthal sites as world heritage, for which this network laid the foundation.
  • Human Origins in South Africa

    Human Origins in South Africa

    Human Origins in South Africa September 8-22, 2018 (15 days) with paleoanthropologist Ian Tattersall © Thomas T. oin Dr. Ian Tattersall, curator emeritus at the Makapansgat American Museum of Natural History and renowned SOUTH AFRICA Valley & Jpaleoanthropologist and author, on this diverse South African # = Hotel nights 2 Polokwane Mapungubwe adventure featuring fascinating paleontological localities; evocative Sterkfontein Caves 1 Pretoria historical sites and modern cities; sublime mountain, veld, and coastal scenery; wildlife viewing and photography opportunities; delicious cuisine; and 4- and 5-star accommodations. Travel from 2 Magaliesberg the lovely Magaliesberg Mountains to early human sites in the Johannesburg “Cradle of Humankind,” such as Sterkfontein Caves, and as far Hoedspruit afield as the Makapansgat Valley, plus archaeological sites in the Mapungubwe Cultural Landscape and the West Coast Fossil Park. Visit Blombos Museum of Archaeology and Pinnacle Point Caves, West Coast Fossil Park 4 Cape Town 2 Kapama Game with private tours of both by a guest archaeologist. Spend two Reserve nights at a luxurious camp to explore the Kapama Game Reserve, Cape Winelands enjoying morning and afternoon game drives. Take guided tours Darling 2 George of Pretoria and Cape Town, and tour the Cape Winelands, where you will sample some of South Africa’s most renowned wines. Indian Ocean Cango Dr. Tattersall and local guides will accompany you throughout, Pinnacle Point Caves Atlantic Ocean Caves weaving together the threads of past and present that make up the rich tapestry of human evolution. Cover, Cape Town. Below, Mapungubwe Hill, Mapungubwe National Park. Bottom, the entrance to the Sterkfontein Caves. Itinerary (B)= Breakfast, (L)= Lunch, (D)= Dinner Saturday, September 8, 2018: Depart Home Depart home on independent flights to Johannesburg, South Africa.
  • Symbolic Use of Marine Shells and Mineral Pigments by Iberian Neandertals

    Symbolic Use of Marine Shells and Mineral Pigments by Iberian Neandertals

    Symbolic use of marine shells and mineral pigments by Iberian Neandertals João Zilhãoa,1, Diego E. Angeluccib, Ernestina Badal-Garcíac, Francesco d’Erricod,e, Floréal Danielf, Laure Dayetf, Katerina Doukag, Thomas F. G. Highamg, María José Martínez-Sánchezh, Ricardo Montes-Bernárdezi, Sonia Murcia-Mascarósj, Carmen Pérez-Sirventh, Clodoaldo Roldán-Garcíaj, Marian Vanhaerenk, Valentín Villaverdec, Rachel Woodg, and Josefina Zapatal aUniversity of Bristol, Department of Archaeology and Anthropology, Bristol BS8 1UU, United Kingdom; bUniversità degli Studi di Trento, Laboratorio di Preistoria B. Bagolini, Dipartimento di Filosofia, Storia e Beni Culturali, 38122 Trento, Italy; cUniversidad de Valencia, Departamento de Prehistoria y Arqueología, 46010 Valencia, Spain; dCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 5199, De la Préhistoire à l’Actuel: Culture, Environnement et Anthropologie, 33405 Talence, France; eUniversity of the Witwatersrand, Institute for Human Evolution, Johannesburg, 2050 Wits, South Africa; fUniversité de Bordeaux 3, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 5060, Institut de Recherche sur les Archéomatériaux, Centre de recherche en physique appliquée à l’archéologie, 33607 Pessac, France; gUniversity of Oxford, Research Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art, Dyson Perrins Building, Oxford OX1 3QY, United Kingdom; hUniversidad de Murcia, Departamento de Química Agrícola, Geología y Edafología, Facultad de Química, Campus de Espinardo, 30100 Murcia, Spain; iFundación de Estudios Murcianos Marqués de Corvera, 30566 Las Torres de Cotillas (Murcia), Spain; jUniversidad de Valencia, Instituto de Ciencia de los Materiales, 46071 Valencia, Spain; kCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 7041, Archéologies et Sciences de l’Antiquité, 92023 Nanterre, France; and lUniversidad de Murcia, Área de Antropología Física, Facultad de Biología, Campus de Espinardo, 30100 Murcia, Spain Communicated by Erik Trinkaus, Washington University, St.
  • Bibliography

    Bibliography

    Bibliography Many books were read and researched in the compilation of Binford, L. R, 1983, Working at Archaeology. Academic Press, The Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology: New York. Binford, L. R, and Binford, S. R (eds.), 1968, New Perspectives in American Museum of Natural History, 1993, The First Humans. Archaeology. Aldine, Chicago. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Braidwood, R 1.,1960, Archaeologists and What They Do. Franklin American Museum of Natural History, 1993, People of the Stone Watts, New York. Age. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Branigan, Keith (ed.), 1982, The Atlas ofArchaeology. St. Martin's, American Museum of Natural History, 1994, New World and Pacific New York. Civilizations. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Bray, w., and Tump, D., 1972, Penguin Dictionary ofArchaeology. American Museum of Natural History, 1994, Old World Civiliza­ Penguin, New York. tions. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Brennan, L., 1973, Beginner's Guide to Archaeology. Stackpole Ashmore, w., and Sharer, R. J., 1988, Discovering Our Past: A Brief Books, Harrisburg, PA. Introduction to Archaeology. Mayfield, Mountain View, CA. Broderick, M., and Morton, A. A., 1924, A Concise Dictionary of Atkinson, R J. C., 1985, Field Archaeology, 2d ed. Hyperion, New Egyptian Archaeology. Ares Publishers, Chicago. York. Brothwell, D., 1963, Digging Up Bones: The Excavation, Treatment Bacon, E. (ed.), 1976, The Great Archaeologists. Bobbs-Merrill, and Study ofHuman Skeletal Remains. British Museum, London. New York. Brothwell, D., and Higgs, E. (eds.), 1969, Science in Archaeology, Bahn, P., 1993, Collins Dictionary of Archaeology. ABC-CLIO, 2d ed. Thames and Hudson, London. Santa Barbara, CA. Budge, E. A. Wallis, 1929, The Rosetta Stone. Dover, New York. Bahn, P.
  • Vilniaus Universiteto Komunikacijos Fakulteto Informacijos Ir Komunikacijos Katedra

    Vilniaus Universiteto Komunikacijos Fakulteto Informacijos Ir Komunikacijos Katedra

    Vilniaus universiteto Komunikacijos fakulteto Informacijos ir komunikacijos katedra Ieva Šimkutė Tarptautinės komunikacijos magistro studijų programos 2 kurso studentė LIEKNUMO IDEALAI ŢINIASKLAIDOJE: TARPKULTŪRINIS ASPEKTAS Magistro baigiamasis darbas Vadovė: dr. Laima Nevinskaitė Vilnius, 2011 Pildo bakalauro / magistro baigiamojo darbo autorius Ieva Šimkutė (magistro baigiamojo darbo autoriaus vardas, pavardė) Lieknumo idealai ţiniasklaidoje: tarpkultūrinis aspektas (magistro baigiamojo darbo pavadinimas lietuvių kalba) Body Image Ideals in the Media: a Cross-cultural Dimension (magistro baigiamojo darbo pavadinimas anglų kalba) Patvirtinu, kad magistro baigiamasis darbas parašytas savarankiškai, nepaţeidţiant kitiems asmenims priklausančių autorių teisių, visas baigiamasis bakalauro/ magistro darbas ar jo dalis nebuvo panaudotas kitose aukštosiose mokyklose. (magistro baigiamojo darbo autoriaus parašas) Sutinku, kad magistro baigiamasis darbas būtų naudojamas neatlygintinai 5 metus Vilniaus universiteto Komunikacijos fakulteto studijų procese. (magistro baigiamojo darbo autoriaus parašas) Pildo bakalauro / magistro baigiamojo darbo vadovas Magistro baigiamąjį darbą ginti ____________________________________________ (įrašyti – leidţiu arba neleidţiu) _______________ _______________________________________________________ (data) (magistro baigiamojo darbo vadovo parašas) Pildo instituto/ katedros, kuruojančios studijų programą, reikalų tvarkytoja Magistro baigiamasis darbas įregistruotas _______________________________________________________________________________