Final Report Florida's Wildlife Legacy Initiative Florida's State Wildlife
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Tellier et al. 2008 FWRI File Code: F2196-05-08-F Final report for Florida’s Wildlife Legacy Initiative Florida’s State Wildlife Grants Program Monitoring the Flora and Fauna of the nearshore hardbottom habitats of the Florida Keys June 16 th , 2008 Report Authors: Marie-Agnès S. Tellier 1 Rodney Bertelsen 1 Principal Investigators: John H. Hunt1 Mark Butler 2 Thomas R. Matthews 1 1 Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Fish and Wildlife Research Institute South Florida Regional Laboratory 2796 overseas highway, suite 119 Marathon, Florida 33050 2 Old Dominion University Department of Biological Science, 110 Mills Godwin Life Science Blds. Norfolk, VA 23529-0266 Tellier et al. 2008 i FWRI File Code: F2196-05-08-F ABSTRACT Florida’s Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy (CWCS) has specifically identified hard-bottom habitat as an area of concern. This project was developed to meet the data needs of the CWCS and allow an evaluation of the status of the hard-bottom community at an ecosystem level. Nearshore hard-bottom surveys of the Florida Keys were conducted from 2002 to 2007 at 32 sites ranging from west of Key West to the Upper Keys. All sites were surveyed visually by divers using SCUBA. Surveys of sessile fauna were conducted during the summer whereas motile fauna (fish and invertebrates) and algal surveys were conducted quarterly in the first year, then spring and fall thereafter. Data were analyzed primarily using multivariate techniques (regression, logistics, factor, discriminant, and non-linear canonical correlation) to explore which taxa, structures, and physical parameters best describe the nearshore hard-bottom community. There were three faunistically district regions in the Florida Keys designated as Oceanside, Channels, and Inner Bay. The centrally positioned Outer Bay region was not distinguishable from any other geographical area in the nearshore hard-bottom habitat. We found that the Anomura spp., Cerithiidae, and Astraea spp. (all small common invertebrates) with a larger decapod, Menippe mercenaria , formed a principal group that responded favorably to hard-bottom structure. While members of this group could be found throughout the Florida Keys, they best characterized the Gulfside region. The Oceanside region could be characterized with the abundance of echinoderms, and octocorals. The majority of sessile invertebrate structure was composed of sponge and octocoral taxa. Sponge structure were correlated with decapod abundance ( Panulirus argus , Menippe mercenaria , and Mithrax spinosissimus ), whereas octocoral structure was correlated with echinoderm abundance, especially Clypeaster rosaceus and Echinometra lucunter . We found two significant trends from 2003 to 2007 in the algal data. The presence of Halimeda spp. increased, and both Halimeda spp and Laurencia spp. increased in percent cover. A majority of the fishes observed during these surveys were juvenile fish. More than 85% of the fish were less than 15 cm total length. Only 79% of all fish taxa had reached up to one-third of their maximum size. We recommend that any management decisions and future regulations regarding the nearshore hard-bottom community account for the unique regional characteristics of the hard-bottom community and recognize that hard-bottom habitat, like seagrass habitat, has an important role as a nursery area for both fish and invertebrates. We also recommend that future monitoring include efforts to link factors between seagrass and hard-bottom by conducting simultaneous surveys in adjacent seagrass and hard-bottom sites. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Support was provided for this project by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission’s program, Florida’s Wildlife Legacy Initiative, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s State Wildlife Grants program (grant number: F2196-05-F). We would also like to thank Dr. Mark Butler IV and his students from Old Dominion University, Dr. William Herrnkind and his students from Florida State University, and the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary for assisting in the data collection. Tellier et al. 2008 ii FWRI File Code: F2196-05-08-F TABLE OF CONTENT ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................................i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...................................................................................................................i INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................1 STUDY AREA ...................................................................................................................................2 METHODS.........................................................................................................................................3 Sampling Procedure........................................................................................................................3 Sessile Invertebrates ...................................................................................................................4 Algae and Seagrass.....................................................................................................................4 Motile Invertebrates....................................................................................................................4 Fish .............................................................................................................................................7 Data Handling and Analysis ...........................................................................................................8 Agreement Analysis....................................................................................................................8 Regression Analysis....................................................................................................................8 Discriminant Analysis.................................................................................................................8 Non-linear Canonical Correlation Analysis................................................................................9 Principal Factor Extraction Analysis ..........................................................................................9 RESULTS...........................................................................................................................................9 Sessile Invertebrates .......................................................................................................................9 Presence-Absence Analysis..........................................................................................................10 Algae and Seagrasses................................................................................................................10 Motile invertebrates..................................................................................................................13 Fish ...........................................................................................................................................16 Percent Cover and Density Analysis ............................................................................................17 Algae-Seagrass .........................................................................................................................17 Agreement Analysis among Algae and Seagrass Data Collection Methods ............................19 Motile invertebrates..................................................................................................................21 Fish ...........................................................................................................................................24 Discriminant analysis....................................................................................................................25 Algae-Seagrass and Region ......................................................................................................25 Sessile Invertebrates and Region ..............................................................................................25 Motile Invertebrates/Fish and Region.......................................................................................25 Non-Linear Canonical Correlation Analysis ................................................................................27 Principal Factor Extraction...........................................................................................................27 DISCUSSION...................................................................................................................................30 MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................37 Recommendations for Future Studies...........................................................................................37 Recommendations for Future Hardbottom Studies.......................................................................37 LITERATURE CITED.....................................................................................................................38 Hunt et al. 2008 1 Report: F219-05/08-F INTRODUCTION Nearshore habitat can be defined geographically as exposed rocky bottom within 2 km of the shore on the Gulf and Florida Bay side or Oceanside of the Florida Keys (Chiappone 1996). Another definition uses hydrodynamic characteristics to describe nearshore