DOCSLIB.ORG

FAA Order JO 7110.65Y Chg 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION JO 7110.65Y CHANGE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION CHG 1 Air Traffic Organization Policy Effective Date: January 30, 2020 SUBJ: Air Traffic Control 1. Purpose of This Change. This change transmits revised pages to Federal Aviation Administration Order JO 7110.65Y, Air Traffic Control, and the Briefing Guide. 2. Audience. This change applies to all Air Traffic Organization (ATO) personnel and anyone using ATO directives. 3. Where Can I Find This Change? This change is available on the FAA Web site at http://faa.gov/air_traffic/publications and https://employees.faa.gov/tools_resources/orders_notices/. 4. Explanation of Policy Change. See the Explanation of Changes attachment which has editorial corrections and changes submitted through normal procedures. The Briefing Guide lists only new or modified material, along with background. 5. Distribution. This change is distributed to selected offices in Washington headquarters, regional offices, service area offices, the William J. Hughes Technical Center, and the Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center. Also, copies are sent to all air traffic field facilities and international aviation field offices; and to interested aviation public. 6. Disposition of Transmittal. Retain this transmittal until superseded by a new basic order. 7. Page Control Chart. See the page control chart attachment. Angela McCullough Vice President, Mission Support Services Air Traffic Organization Date: _______________________ Distribution: ZAT-710, ZAT-464 Initiated By: AJV-0 Vice President, Mission Support Services 1/30/20 JO 7110.65Y CHG 1 Explanation of Changes Change 1 Direct questions through appropriate facility/service center office staff to the Office of Primary Interest (OPI) a. 1−2−6. ABBREVIATIONS signs” are specified as “other FAA authorized call 2−8−1. FURNISH RVR/RVV VALUES signs”. Editorial changes and reference changes 2−8−2. ARRIVAL/DEPARTURE have been made to provide clarity, emphasis and RUNWAY VISIBILITY improved understanding of these three paragraphs. 2−8−3. TERMINOLOGY d. 2−6−4. ISSUING WEATHER AND 3−4−11. HIGH INTENSITY RUNWAY, CHAFF AREAS RUNWAY CENTERLINE, AND TOUCHDOWN ZONE LIGHTS This change adds language to clarify that when an aircraft is vectored or deviates off of a procedure, all This changes removes all references to Runway published speeds are canceled. Controllers must Visual Value (RVV) from this order. issue a speed if one is needed. b. 2−3−8. AIRCRAFT EQUIPMENT e. 2−6−6. HAZARDOUS INFLIGHT SUFFIX WEATHER ADVISORY SERVICE (HIWAS) 2−3−9. CLEARANCE STATUS 2−9−3. CONTENT This change updates paragraph 2–3–8 to reflect This change deletes commissioned HIWAS areas as current ATC procedures for properly amending an this broadcast service is no longer provided by aircraft’s equipment suffix. In addition, Table Flight Service. This change cancels and incorpo- 2–3–10, Aircraft Equipment Suffixes, is amended rates Notice JO 7110.768, Hazardous Inflight to correctly define the /O and /H equipment Weather Advisory Service (HIWAS), which was suffixes. effective January 8, 2020. c. 2−4−9. ABBREVIATED TRANSMIS- f. 3−10−5. LANDING CLEARANCE SIONS This change adds guidance to FAA Order JO 2−4−15. EMPHASIS FOR CLARITY 7110.65, Air Traffic Control, for controllers when 2−4−20. AIRCRAFT IDENTIFICATION they become aware an aircraft is about to land and This change to paragraph 2−4−9 clarifies the has aligned to the wrong surface. When controllers aircraft identifications that may be abbreviated and become aware that an aircraft has aligned to the provides improved descriptions of the aircraft wrong surface, the controller must inform the pilot identifications that are not to be abbreviated. This and issue control instructions/clearances. If time change to paragraph 2−4−15 consolidates permits, the controller will notify the pilot of the procedures for similar sounding call signs into a misalignment and have the pilot verify the landing single paragraph. A procedural NOTE pertaining to runway. This change cancels and incorporates similar sounding call signs is relocated (and Notice JO 7110.766, Landing Clearance (Wrong reworded) from paragraph 2−4−20 and added as a Surface Landings), which was effective September sub−paragraph to 2−4−15. This change to paragraph 23, 2019. 2−4−20a1 deletes the NOTE and associated g. 5−1−3. ATC SURVEILLANCE SOURCE EXAMPLE and relocates both to paragraph USE 2−4−15. Several NOTES in 2−4−20 are modified or 5−2−1. ASSIGNMENT CRITERIA added to provide reference for similar sounding call 5−2−13. STANDBY OR LOW signs. Paragraph 2−4−20b is updated to reflect that SENSITIVITY OPERATION foreign civil aircraft registration identifications are 5−2−17. FAILED TRANSPONDER IN to be stated in full. The term “air carrier” is replaced CLASS A AIRSPACE by “ICAO 3LD” and “U.S special and local call 5−2−23. BEACON TERMINATION Explanation of Changes E of C−1 JO 7110.65Y CHG 1 1/30/20 5−3−2. PRIMARY RADAR j. 5−6−2. METHODS IDENTIFICATION METHODS 5−3−3. BEACON IDENTIFICATION This change adds language to clarify that when an METHODS aircraft is vectored or deviates off of a procedure, all published speeds are canceled. Controllers must This change updates multiple paragraphs to align issue a speed if one is needed. them with ADS−B Out technology and current k. 5−7−1. APPLICATION regulatory requirements, deletes obsolete refer- ences to aircraft transponder “low sensitivity This change clarifies that when an aircraft is position” operation and “blooming” target displays, vectored or deviates off of a procedure that contains and makes other minor editorial changes. This published speeds, those speeds are canceled. A change cancels and incorporates Notice JO NOTE is added that advises controllers that the last 7110.770, Automatic Dependent Surveillance− speed on a STAR will be maintained until ATC Broadcast (ADS−B) Related Changes, which was changes it. A second note is added identifying the effective January 2, 2020. importance of advising pilots where they can expect to resume the published speed. h. 5−2−25. INOPERATIVE OR MALFUNCTIONING ADS−B l. 5−8−3. SUCCESSIVE OR SIMULTANE- TRANSMITTER OUS DEPARTURES 5−2−26. ADS−B ALERTS This change adds the term immediately after 5−2−27. ADS−B OUT OFF departure to the conditions for the use of ELSO to OPERATIONS remove any ambiguity and also aligns the meaning of “Immediately after departure” to account for the This change adds language to paragraphs 5–2–25 minimum required divergence permitted under and 5–2–26 that reflects the recent amendments to ELSO. This change also re−formats the paragraph 14 CFR Section 91.225(f), which gives air traffic to flow better, and to help the reader to better controllers the authority to direct an aircraft to stop distinguish the conditions required to meet the transmitting ADS−B when transmitting would ELSO standard. jeopardize the safe execution of air traffic control functions. This change updates paragraph 5–2–26 m. 5−9−9. SIMULTANEOUS OFFSET IN- subparagraph b, deleting the reporting requirements STRUMENT APPROACHES (SOIA)− HIGH related to a Duplicate ICAO Address. This change UPDATE RADAR also adds a new paragraph that provides guidance This change removes the requirement for high concerning FAA−authorized ADS−B Out OFF update rate surveillance when conducting SOIA operations. Lastly, this change harmonizes termi- operations. It also corrects the tower applied Visual nology in this paragraph with that used by ICAO as Separation provision which is noted in error. well as in the Aeronautical Information Manual (AIM) and the Aeronautical Information Publica- n. 8−7−3. LONGITUDINAL SEPARATION tion (AIP), and makes editorial changes for 8−7−4. LATERAL SEPARATION consistency within FAA Order JO 7110.65. This 8−8−3. LONGITUDINAL SEPARATION change cancels and incorporates Notice JO 8−8−4. LATERAL SEPARATION 7110.770, Automatic Dependent Surveillance− 8−9−3. LONGITUDINAL SEPARATION Broadcast (ADS−B) Related Changes, which was 8−9−4. LATERAL SEPARATION effective January 2, 2020. 8−10−3. LONGITUDINAL SEPARA- TION i. 5−5−4. MINIMA 8−10−4. LATERAL SEPARATION This editorial change accounts for the use of This change adds the compulsory Required FUSION targets when authorizing 2.5 nautical mile Communication Performance (RCP) and Required reduced separation on final within 10 NM of the Surveillance Performance (RSP) values to the landing runway in accordance with paragraph Chapter 8 performance−based longitudinal and 5−5−4 j. lateral separation paragraphs and tables. E of C−2 1/30/20 JO 7110.65Y CHG 1 o. 9−3−2. SEPARATION MINIMA p. Editorial Changes This change stipulates the separation standards and Editorial changes include making P/CG a consistent procedures to be used while aircraft are operating in abbreviation, clarifying the appropriate approval proximity to aircraft hazard areas (AHA) and authority directorate in paragraph 5−14−5b NOTE, transitional hazard areas (THA) that may be and updating incorrect references throughout. designated as temporary flight restrictions or stationary altitude reservations. This change q. Entire publication cancels and incorporates Notice JO 7110.767, Separation Minima During Commercial Launch Additional editorial/format changes were made and Reentry Operations, which was effective where necessary. Revision bars were not used October 15, 2019. because of the insignificant nature of these changes. Explanation of Changes E of C−3 1/30/20 JO 7110.65Y CHG 1 PAGE CONTROL CHART REMOVE PAGES DATED INSERT PAGES DATED Table of Contents i through xx ........... 8/15/19 Table of Contents i through xx .......... 1/30/20 1−1−1 and 1−1−2 ...................... 8/15/19 1−1−1 and 1−1−2 ..................... 1/30/20 1−2−3 ............................... 8/15/19 1−2−3 .............................. 8/15/19 1−2−4 through 1−2−7................... 8/15/19 1−2−4 through 1−2−7.................
Recommended publications
  • Aircraft of Today. Aerospace Education I

    Aircraft of Today. Aerospace Education I

    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 068 287 SE 014 551 AUTHOR Sayler, D. S. TITLE Aircraft of Today. Aerospace EducationI. INSTITUTION Air Univ.,, Maxwell AFB, Ala. JuniorReserve Office Training Corps. SPONS AGENCY Department of Defense, Washington, D.C. PUB DATE 71 NOTE 179p. EDRS PRICE MF-$0.65 HC-$6.58 DESCRIPTORS *Aerospace Education; *Aerospace Technology; Instruction; National Defense; *PhysicalSciences; *Resource Materials; Supplementary Textbooks; *Textbooks ABSTRACT This textbook gives a brief idea aboutthe modern aircraft used in defense and forcommercial purposes. Aerospace technology in its present form has developedalong certain basic principles of aerodynamic forces. Differentparts in an airplane have different functions to balance theaircraft in air, provide a thrust, and control the general mechanisms.Profusely illustrated descriptions provide a picture of whatkinds of aircraft are used for cargo, passenger travel, bombing, and supersonicflights. Propulsion principles and descriptions of differentkinds of engines are quite helpful. At the end of each chapter,new terminology is listed. The book is not available on the market andis to be used only in the Air Force ROTC program. (PS) SC AEROSPACE EDUCATION I U S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. EDUCATION & WELFARE OFFICE OF EDUCATION THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRO OUCH) EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FROM THE PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIG INATING IT POINTS OF VIEW OR OPIN 'IONS STATED 00 NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT OFFICIAL OFFICE OF EOU CATION POSITION OR POLICY AIR FORCE JUNIOR ROTC MR,UNIVERS17/14AXWELL MR FORCEBASE, ALABAMA Aerospace Education I Aircraft of Today D. S. Sayler Academic Publications Division 3825th Support Group (Academic) AIR FORCE JUNIOR ROTC AIR UNIVERSITY MAXWELL AIR FORCE BASE, ALABAMA 2 1971 Thispublication has been reviewed and approvedby competent personnel of the preparing command in accordance with current directiveson doctrine, policy, essentiality, propriety, and quality.
  • FAA Order JO 7110.65U, Air Traffic Control

    FAA Order JO 7110.65U, Air Traffic Control

    ORDER JO 7110.65U Air Traffic Organization Policy Effective Date: February 9, 2012 SUBJ: Air Traffic Control This order prescribes air traffic control procedures and phraseology for use by personnel providing air traffic control services. Controllers are required to be familiar with the provisions of this order that pertain to their operational responsibilities and to exercise their best judgment if they encounter situations not covered by it. Distribution: ZAT-710, ZAT-464 Initiated By: AJV-0 Vice President, System Operations Services RECORD OF CHANGES DIRECTIVE NO. JO 7110.65U CHANGE SUPPLEMENTS CHANGE SUPPLEMENTS TO OPTIONAL TO OPTIONAL BASIC BASIC FAA Form 1320−5 (6−80) USE PREVIOUS EDITION 2/9/12 JO 7110.65U Explanation of Changes Basic Direct questions through appropriate facility/service center office staff to the Office of Primary Interest (OPI) a. 2−5−2. NAVAID TERMS d. 5−9−10. SIMULTANEOUS INDEPEND- 4−2−1. CLEARANCE ITEMS ENT APPROACHES TO WIDELY-SPACED 4−2−5. ROUTE OR ALTITUDE PARALLEL RUNWAYS WITHOUT FINAL AMENDMENTS MONITORS 4−2−9. CLEARANCE ITEMS 4−3−2. DEPARTURE CLEARANCE This change adds a new paragraph allowing 4−3−3. ABBREVIATED DEPARTURE simultaneous independent approaches to widely CLEARANCE spaced parallel runways separated by 9,000 feet or 4−7−1. CLEARANCE INFORMATION more−without monitors. This change cancels and 4−8−2. CLEARANCE LIMIT incorporates N JO 7110.559, Simultaneous Inde- This change clarifies how to issue clearances that pendent Approaches to Widely-Spaced Parallel contain NAVAIDs and provides new phraseology Runways Without Final Monitors, effective and examples. July 29, 2011. b.
  • Table of Contents Next Page

    Table of Contents Next Page

    , SERVICE PUBLICATION OF OCKHEED-GEORGIA COMPANY / DIVISION OF OCKHEED CORPORATION Editor: Don H. Hungate Associate Editors: Charles I. Gale, James A. Loftin, Arch McCleskey, Patricia Thomas Art Direction and Production: Anne G. Anderson This summer marks the 25th anniversary of the first flight of the Lockheed Hercules; a Volume 6, No. 3, July - September 1979 quarter century of service to nations throughout the world! Over 1,550 Hercules (C-130s Vol. 6, No. 3, July. September 1979 and L-100) have been delivered to 44 countries. We at Lockheed are very proud of this Contents: record and the reputation the Hercules has earned. It is a reputation built on depend- ability, versatility, and durability. 2 Focal Point The Hercules is a true workhorse. Many developing countries depend on it to carry all types of cargo, from lifesaving food to road-building equipment. They carry these cargoes to remote areas that are not easily accessible by any other mode of transporta- 3 tion. An additional advantage is its ability to land and take off in incredibly short 3 Crew Door Rigging distances, even on unpaved clearings. The tasks the Hercules is capable of accomplishing are almost limitless; from hunting hurricanes, to flying mercy relief missions. It is the universal airborne platform. And it is 14 Royal Norwegian Air Force energy-efficient, using only about half the fuel a comparable jet aircraft would require. 15 One of the more interesting aspects of these 25 years is that while the external design of 15 Hydraulic Pressure Drop the aircraft has changed very little, constant improvements in systems and avionics equip- ment have made the world’s outstanding cargo airplane also among the world’s most modern.
  • Suborbital Reusable Launch Vehicles and Applicable Markets

    Suborbital Reusable Launch Vehicles and Applicable Markets

    SUBORBITAL REUSABLE LAUNCH VEHICLES AND APPLICABLE MARKETS Prepared by J. C. MARTIN and G. W. LAW Space Launch Support Division Space Launch Operations October 2002 Space Systems Group THE AEROSPACE CORPORATION El Segundo, CA 90245-4691 Prepared for U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE OFFICE OF SPACE COMMERCIALIZATION Herbert C. Hoover Building 14th and Constitution Ave., NW Washington, DC 20230 (202) 482-6125, 482-5913 Contract No. SB1359-01-Z-0020 PUBLIC RELEASE IS AUTHORIZED Preface This report has been prepared by The Aerospace Corporation for the Department of Commerce, Office of Space Commercialization, under contract #SB1359-01-Z-0020. The objective of this report is to characterize suborbital reusable launch vehicle (RLV) concepts currently in development, and define the military, civil, and commercial missions and markets that could capitalize on their capabilities. The structure of the report includes a brief background on orbital vs. suborbital trajectories, as well as an overview of expendable and reusable launch vehicles. Current and emerging market opportunities for suborbital RLVs are identified and discussed. Finally, the report presents the technical aspects and program characteristics of selected U.S. and international suborbital RLVs in development. The appendix at the end of this report provides further detail on each of the suborbital vehicles, as well as the management biographies for each of the companies. The integration of suborbital RLVs with existing airports and/or spaceports, though an important factor that needs to be evaluated, was not the focus of this effort. However, it should be noted that the RLV concepts discussed in this report are being designed to minimize unique facility requirements.
  • AOE 3104 Problem Sheet 10 (Ans) Our Class Business Jet Has the Following Characteristics

    AOE 3104 Problem Sheet 10 (Ans) Our Class Business Jet Has the Following Characteristics

    AOE 3104 Problem Sheet 10 (ans) Our class business jet has the following characteristics: Gross Weight = 10,000 lbs b = 40 ft CLmax = 1.8 (normal flight) 2 2 S = 200 ft CD = 0.02 + 0.05 (CL) CLmax = 2.4 (with flaps) 2 engines with 1000 lb / engine (up and away drag polar) During ground roll, the wing is 5 ft above the ground The coefficient of friction on the paved runway is : = 0.02 : The coefficient during braking is b = 0.3 51. Calculate the takeoff ground roll distance assuming no flaps are used for takeoff and that minimum takeoff distance conditions are used during the ground roll. Must calculate the conditions on the ground: However, units must be SI units so: and Then and The ground effect on the induced drag parameter K. Then the correction factor N is given by and Therefore This is the ground drag polar! For minimum distance takeoff, the proper ground lift coefficient is given by: The corresponding drag coefficient is determined from the ground drag polar” We can now calculate the constants in the takeoff equations: We need to calculate the reference speeds: Finally the takeoff distance can be calculated from: 52. Calculate the landing ground roll distance for this aircraft assuming a full flap landing and that zero lift occurs during the ground roll, and that brakes are applied at touch-down (short field landing in which you retract the flaps and hit the brakes as soon as possible after touch-down). Here we will assume that we land with flaps so we need to calculate new reference airspeeds: Ground run, no flaps.
  • Acquisition Story 54 Introduction 2 Who We Were 4 194Os 8 195Os 12

    Acquisition Story 54 Introduction 2 Who We Were 4 194Os 8 195Os 12

    table of contents Introduction 2 Who We Were 4 194Os 8 195Os 12 196Os 18 197Os 26 198Os 30 199Os 34 2OOOs 38 2O1Os 42 Historical Timeline 46 Acquisition Story 54 Who We Are Now 58 Where We Are Going 64 Vision For The Future 68 1 For nearly a century, innovation and reliability have been the hallmarks of two giant U.S. aerospace icons – Aerojet and Rocketdyne. The companies’ propulsion systems have helped to strengthen national defense, launch astronauts into space, and propel unmanned spacecraft to explore the universe. ➢ Aerojet’s diverse rocket propulsion systems have powered military vehicles for decades – from rocket-assisted takeoff for propeller airplanes during World War II – through today’s powerful intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs). The systems helped land men on the moon, and maneuvered spacecraft beyond our solar system. ➢ For years, Rocketdyne engines have played a major role in national defense, beginning with powering the United States’ first ICBM to sending modern military communication satellites into orbit. Rocketdyne’s technology also helped launch manned moon missions, propelled space shuttles, and provided the main power system for the International Space Station (ISS). ➢ In 2013, these two rocket propulsion manufacturers became Aerojet Rocketydne, blending expertise and vision to increase efficiency, lower costs, and better compete in the market. Now, as an industry titan, Aerojet Rocketdyne’s talented, passionate employees collaborate to create even greater innovations that protect America and launch its celestial future. 2011 A Standard Missile-3 (SM-3) interceptor is being developed as part of the U.S. Missile Defense Agency’s sea-based Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense System.
  • Nasa Technical Memorandum

    Nasa Technical Memorandum

    NASA TECHNICAL NASA TM X* 73,231 MEMORANDUM LARGE-SCALE V/STOL TESTING David G. Koenig, Thomas N. Aiken, Kiyoshi Aoyng' Ames Research Center Moffett Field, Calif. 94035 nnd Michael D. Fnlorski Aines Directornte, USAAMRDL Ames Research Center Moffett Field, Calif, 9403: (NASA-TM-X-7 3231) LARGE-SCALE V/STOL N77-23OG 1 TESTING (EASA) 36 p HC A02/NP 801 CSCL 01C . 1. Woport No. 2. Governmmt Accarlon No. 3. Raclpientt* btelop No. NASA TM 2-73,231 4. Titlo and Suhlltlo 6. Rcport Oslo LARGE-SCALE V/STOL TESTING 8. Parforming Organlretlan &do 7. AuthorC1 0. Periormlng Orpnlzmlion Roport No. David G. Koenig,h Thomas N. Aiken,* Kiyoshl Aoyagi* A-7002 and Ml..cchaol D , l!alarslti** to, Work Unlt No. 0, PerformingOrgsnit~tton Nams md Addrsu 505-10-41 Wmes Research Center, NASA and 11. Conlnct or Grant No. h*Ames Directorate, USAAMIU)L Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035 13, Typa of Report ond Period Covercd 12, Sponrorlng Agency Namr and Address Technical Memorandum National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 14. Sponsoring Awncy &do Washington, D,C. 20546 and U.S. Army Air Mobility R&D Laboratory, Moffett Field. Calif. 94035 16. Supplumantary Notes 16. Abstract Several facet8 of large-scale testing of V/STOL aircraft configurations are discussed with particular emphasis on test experience in the Ames 40- by 80-Foot Wind Tunnel. Exariple~of powered-lift teat prngrame are preeented in order to illustrate rradeoffs confronting the planner of V/STOL test program. It is indicated that large-scale V/STOL wind-tunnel testing can sometimes compete with small-scale testing in the effort required (overall test time) and program costa because of the possibility of conducting a number of different tests with a single large-scale model where several small-scale models would be reql~ired.
  • Wicthssified <' )$ #-C ?Ih . . ~I

    Wicthssified <' )$ #-C ?Ih . . ~I

    APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE WICthSSIFIED <’ )$ #- ~i . c d -’if?’ PORT COLLECTION I ?iHP ODUCTION Cgyw LA-2590 Copy No. 1 c~, 3 AECRESEARCHANDDEVELOPMENTREPORT PUBLICLY RELEASABLE Per JI!z4?&&& FSS- 16 Date: 4-3d-?Z CIC-14 Date:J-J?.3:7S- ,. , a LOS ALAMOS SCIENTIFIC LABORATORY . OF THE UNIVERSITYOF CALIFORNIAo LOSALAMOS NEW MEXICO VERIFIED UN(!LASSIF#E~ Per MPH 6-ji’u-7y. ..:. .. ASPEN An Aerospace Plane With Nuclear Engines (Title Unclassified) . .. .. .. —— —-- . _- a..- .-. .* .“. .-=+. --~. .——-, ..-. , “J, 4.- .-.’ APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE . LEGAL NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of Govern- ment sponso~ed work. ‘Ne_ither the United States, nor the Commission, nor any person acting on behalf of the Com- mission: A. Makes any warranty or representation, expressed or implied, with respect to the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of the information contained in this report, or that the use of any information, apparatus, method, or pro- cess disclosed in this report may not infringe privately owned rights; or B. Assumes any liabilities with respect to the use of, or for damages resulting from the use of any informa- tion, apparatus, method, or process disclosed in this re- port, As used in the above, “person acting on behalf of the Commission” includes any employee or contractor of the Commission, or employee of such contractor, to the extent that such employee or contractor of the Commission, or employee of such contractor prepares, disseminates, or provides access to, any information pursuant to his em- ployment or contract with the Commission, or his employ- ment with such contractor. ,... APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE LA-2590 C-91, NUCLEAR ROCKET ENGINES M-3679 (25th Ed.) LOS ALAMOS SCIENTIFIC LABORATORY OF THE UNIVERSITYOF CALIFORNIA LOS ALAMOS NEW MEXICO REPORT WRITTEN May 1961 REPORT DISTRIBUTED: September 2’7, 1961 ASPEN An Aerospace Plane With Nuclear Engines (Title Unclassified) by R.
  • UAV CHART 2011 Low-Res

    UAV CHART 2011 Low-Res

    20112011 WorldwideWorldwide UAVUAV RoundupRoundup Country Prime Designation Development Production Operation Propulsion Gross Wt., kg Payload Wt., kg Wing Span, m Endurance, hr Range, km Ceiling, m Mission Country Prime Designation Development Production Operation Propulsion Gross Wt. kg Payload Wt., kg Wing Span, m Endurance , hr Range, km Ceiling, m Mission ABU DHABI ADCOM Military Industries Yabhon RX-6 Completed (?) In production Deployed Piston pusher prop 1,100 110 6 30 14,500 R/S RUSSIA (continued) ZALA 421-09 Under way Piston prop 70 10 3.9 10.5 50 3,000 RSTA - BDA -satcomm Yabhon RX-18 Under way Jet 1,250 18 Predator-class MALE ZALA 421-12 MAV Completed Electric C-L 3.9 1 1.6 2 3,600 R/S - monitoring (ADCOM uses the Yabhon Yabhon HMD Completed In production Deployed Twin turbo 1.2 High-speed target drone ZALA 421-15 VTOL Under way Electric 5 0.5 Rotor diam. 1.35 20 min 15 2,500 R/S - monitoring name for a wide range of UAVs Yabhon HM Completed In production Deployed Turbine ZALA 421-16 Completed Piston prop - C-L 16 3 1.62 7 50 3,000 R/S - SAR - video relay; monitoring with little else in common) Yabhon-H Completed In production Deployed Piston pusher prop 3.28 8 Reconnaissance ZALA 421-20 (?) GAS 200 50 6 8 70-400 3,700 Reconnaissance/surveillance; monitoring Yabhon-M Completed In production Deployed 30 5.7 Reconnaissance ZALA 421-21 mini-VTOL (?) Electric - 6 rotors 1.5 0.5 Rotor diam. 0.22 25 min 5 1,000 Surveillance; monitor; video Yabhon-R Completed In production Deployed 50 6.56 30 MALE R/S; SAR; monitoring ZALA 421-23 VTOL Under way GAS rotor 35 13 Rotor diam.
  • Explore the Space Hangar

    Explore the Space Hangar

    EXPLORE THE SPACE HANGAR DISCOVER SPACECRAFT in the James S. McDonnell Space Hangar at the Steven F. Udvar-Hazy Center CHOOSE your favorite space exploration vehicle when you finish. USE the map on page 10 to find them. Goddard 1935 A Series rocket A B C D LOOK FOR: A The nose cone. How does the shape of the nose cone on the A Series rocket compare to nose cones on nearby rockets? Top: Goddard A Series rocket; insets of Goddard holding rocket and Goddard Is it sharper, blunter, or the same? postage stamp B The window on the rocket near the nose cone. What can you see inside? ■ liquid fuel tank ■ parachute ■ computer C The vanes. The vanes/tail fins help to stabilize the rocket in flight. How many vanes are on the Goddard A Series rocket? ■ 2 ■ 3 ■ 4 ■ 6 D The nozzle(s). The exhaust nozzles squeeze gases out producing a force/thrust that pushes the rocket forward. The Goddard A Series rocket had a thrust of 900 newtons, N, (200 lb). Each of the three Space Shuttle engines has a thrust of 2,000,000 N (418,000 lb). How many nozzles are there on the Goddard A Series rocket? ■ 1 ■ 2 ■ 3 ■ 5 A Series launch COMPARE: Rockets from the 1940s and 50s near the Goddard A Series rocket The Corporal is 3 times as tall as the Goddard A Series rocket with a thrust of ~90,000 N (20,000 lb) and a range of 120 km (75 miles). The Regulus Cruise missile is twice as tall as the Goddard A Series rocket with a thrust of ~20,000 N (4,600 lb) and a range of 8000 km (5000 miles).
  • JATO STUDY BEGUN Structures of Widely-Varied Types

    JATO STUDY BEGUN Structures of Widely-Varied Types

    FIG. 1. The Muroc Test Station control room at the Muroc Army Air base, California. ¥H Jet Pronuhion Laboratory i-i located within a various narts of the United S 1 fenced enclosure covering app~o~imatel~forty acres companies throughout the Los Angeles area. ' near the western limits of the city of Pasadena, California. Within the enclosure are more than eighty JATO STUDY BEGUN structures of widely-varied types. Dominating the en- The research begun in 1939 on Jet-Assisted Take-Off trance is the Administration Building. Beyond it are for Aircraft under the ausnices of the National Academy numerous test pits cience, continued the modest work that had been systems for solid an ated in 1936. It was understood, as it continues to ramjets and turbojet the Laboratory primarily should he concerned in high-temperature he solution of basic research problems, to enable ing of solid propellants; rmed Services to develop equipment of novel type. on underwater missiles; f the immediate objectives of Frank J. Malina. tveldmg shops. , Parsons and Edward S. Forman, appointed to Under construction t the research program for the first year, was to two types of rocket motors; one, utilizing the his-hlv-comnressedu, a The staff at the Laboratory numbers more than 385. solid propellant, the other. a liquid propel- The facilities with equipment are valued approximately . Both types had to he capable of delivering a at $3,000,000. tant and sufficient thrust for a period long enough ssist a plane to take off and reach an altitude con- ed safe to continue its flight unassisted.
  • FAA Order JO 7110.65Y Chg 2

    FAA Order JO 7110.65Y Chg 2

    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION JO 7110.65Y CHANGE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION CHG 2 Air Traffic Organization Policy Effective Date: July 16, 2020 SUBJ: Air Traffic Control 1. Purpose of This Change. This change transmits revised pages to Federal Aviation Administration Order JO 7110.65Y, Air Traffic Control, and the Briefing Guide. 2. Audience. This change applies to all Air Traffic Organization (ATO) personnel and anyone using ATO directives. 3. Where Can I Find This Change? This change is available on the FAA Web site at http://faa.gov/air_traffic/publications and https://employees.faa.gov/tools_resources/orders_notices/. 4. Explanation of Policy Change. See the Explanation of Changes attachment which has editorial corrections and changes submitted through normal procedures. The Briefing Guide lists only new or modified material, along with background. 5. Distribution. This change is distributed to selected offices in Washington headquarters, regional offices, service area offices, the William J. Hughes Technical Center, and the Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center. Also, copies are sent to all air traffic field facilities and international aviation field offices; and to interested aviation public. 6. Disposition of Transmittal. Retain this transmittal until superseded by a new basic order. 7. Page Control Chart. See the page control chart attachment. Angela McCullough Vice President, Mission Support Services Air Traffic Organization Date: _______________________6/8/2020 Distribution: ZAT-710, ZAT-464 Initiated By: AJV-0 Vice President, Mission Support Services 7/16/20 JO 7110.65Y CHG 2 Explanation of Changes Change 2 Direct questions through appropriate facility/service center office staff to the Office of Primary Interest (OPI) a.