Mental Protection & Agriculture

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mental Protection & Agriculture Best practice examples for environ- mental protection & agriculture Landcare Associations in Natura 2000 sites 2 Contents Ebersberg Streuwiesen Water meadows on the 4 Lech near Augsburg 20 Dillingen river mussels Höchstadt wetlands 8 24 Dingolfing bird Würzburg paradise farmland biotopes 12 suzbah - fotolia.com 28 Heathland in the Bamberg Albtrauf area 16 Editorial information PUBLISHED BY: Deutscher Verband für Landschaftspflege e.V. (Landcare Germany) Promenade 9 91522 Ansbach Tel: 0981/1800 990 [email protected] CONCEPTUAL DESIGN AND COPY: Christiane Feucht PHOTOS: Peter Roggenthin, www.roggenthin.de LAYOUT: Nicole Sillner, alma grafica UG PRINTING: Thuy GmbH, Ansbach Carbon neutral; printed on 100% recycled paper © All rights reserved; Second, revised edition Ansbach 2018 3 Voluntary collaboration – Landcare associations in Natura 2000 sites The Natura 2000 network was set up to protect the diversity Farmers, nature conservationists and local politicians work of species and biotopes in Europe. Bavaria has designated a together on an equal footing in Landcare Associations. This total of 11.4 % of its area as Natura 2000 sites. The diversity brochure highlights how they collaborate by managing Natura that they contain is our region’s natural treasure. These sites are 2000 sites. dependent on careful management in many ways. Employees of the Landcare Associations are at the forefront. The species and biotopes in Natura 2000 sites have to be They inform, advise, communicate and are reliable partners for conserved and developed. Managing these areas is not easy local authorities and agriculture. My thanks go to them together because there are often conflicting interests of owners, land with my recognition of their commitment and work. users and nature conservationists. The DVL approach focuses on “cooperative nature conservation” and is based on voluntary cooperation of all parties. Landcare Associations have been mentioned several times by the European Commission as exemplary organisations for Josef Göppel collaboration with local authorities and farmers. Chairman of Landcare Germany (DVL) Leo Ott Farmers are a godsend 5 for this area. Ebersberg Streuwiesen JOSEF RÜEGG LANDCARE ASSOCIATION EBERSBERG Natura 2000 site Gutterstätt Streuwiesen (meadows cut for animal bedding) Locality Ebersberg rural district Size of site 16 ha Landowners Predominantly private owners, district Agricultural use Grassland, predominantly approved for direct payments Programme of the Bavarian Ministry Landcare and nature Mowing, scrub clearance for Environment and reserve regulation Consumer Protection 6 mall is beautiful”: Josef Rüegg, Di- fritillary can be espied on occasion. he Landcare Association was able to rector of the Landcare Association prevent a change of management in “SEbersberg, puts it in a nutshell when de- owever, this change did not happen Tthe Gutterstätt Streuwiesen. When many scribing the six hectares of the Gutterstätt by itself – it is the result of excellent farmers abandoned the unprofitable Streuwiesen. Hcooperation between the nature conser- meadows in the early 1990s, the area These are meadows of purple moor grass vation authority, the Landcare Association, threatened to return to scrubland. This and low-lying marshlands on the north- landowners and farmers. would have meant the loss of numerous ern edge of the foothills of the Alps. The Purple moor grass meadows and low-ly- species of flora and fauna. In order to agrobiologist enthusiastically explains ing marshlands are to be found primarily avoid this, the Landcare Association talked how these meadows, which are poor in the south of Germany, with their main to many landowners and they agreed to in nutrients but rich in species, are still geographical concentration in the Alpine maintain extensive mowing. The Landcare used as traditional meadows for provid- foothills of Bavaria. The meadows were Association submitted its first application ing animal bedding – as they were 150 created by extensive late mowing and are for funding from conservation funds and years ago – where the marsh gladiolus mostly very rich in species, which makes started looking for farmers to mow the blossoms once again and the marsh gen- them so valuable for nature conservation. grass and cut the bushes. tian spread. Where the dusky large blue They react very sensitively to fertilisation flutters and the highly endangered marsh and changes in utilisation. The Streuwiesen meadows are Josef Rüegg discusses The numbers of the rare marsh fritillary have a jewel for nature conservationists. upcoming activities been steadily increasing over the years since with the three farmers. the meadows have been cut. 7 n 2007 the Gutterstätt meadows were he three livestock owners Josef Abin- here, and we can preserve them through designated as European protection ger, Martin Hutterer and Hans Zehet- our work for the Landcare Association.” Iarea. “I thought that everything would Tmaier traditionally mow the meadows in be forbidden” Josef Abinger, farmer and September and use the cut grass as animal hey are paid for their work by the landowner, remembers. But this was far bedding. “It’s physically very demanding Landcare Association and they receive from the case, as he and his colleagues because a lot of the work is manual. We Tdirect payments for the management of were astonished to find. “Nothing has do it because we live here. We see nature the area. Josef Rüegg smiles. “These three changed really. We keep on mowing the all the time, we drive past here often farmers are a godsend for the area! With it meadows and we’ll do that as long as we enough. We can see the success. It’s also being used agriculturally, these meadows, can and we get money for it.” On the basis an extra way of making money, particularly rich in species, have been created and we of the many years’ good cooperation be- nowadays when, as a farmer, you always can only maintain this jewel with the help tween the Landcare Association and local have to look for ways to earn a little extra. of these farmers and appropriate funding” players, discussions between the nature But we don’t do it just for the money, we he explains, with a satisfied look over the conservation authorities and all parties in- want to do something good for the area. meadows. volved regarding the designation of nature For ourselves but also for everyone else. protection area ran smoothly. We like the plants and animals we’ve got The three farmers and livestock owners The farmers mow the meadows once a year, These meadows, with their numerous orchids, are happy with the as their ancestors did, and keep an eye on the can only maintain such a rich diversity of management of the Natura 2000 site. diversity of plant life. species by late mowing. In order to keep streams in their 9 natural state, we have to consider the whole catchment area and make a lot of adjustments. Dillingen river mussels SUSANNE KLING DONAUTAL-AKTIV E.V. Natura 2000 site Nebelbach, Klosterbach and Brunnenbach streams Locality Dillingen rural district Size of site 318 ha Landowners Private owners, district authorities, local authorities, the Free State of Bavaria Agricultural use Woods, arable land, meadows and pastures, approved for direct payments Contractual nature conservation 22 ha extensive use of grassland Programme of the programme Bavarian Ministry Hydromorphological implementation of for Environment and Guidelines for grants for stream the Brunnenbach concept, hydromor- Consumer Protection basin management phological measures Biodiversity project “Bringing back Swabia’s best river mussels” – Swabian Other projects and regional government; BayernNetzNatur project “River mussels in the funding authorities Dillingen rural district” – Bavarian Nature Conservation Fund; boden:ständig – Bavarian State Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Forestry 10 illingen has the largest stocks he river mussels live in clear, fast-flow- the streams have an uninterrupted course of river mussels anywhere in ing streams with dense, sandy to and are well structured. Settling ponds and “DBavaria! We bear a great responsibility” Tgravelly beds. They are dependent on fish buffer zones are created in places affected Susanne Kling from Landcare Association such as minnows to reproduce, which act by erosion. Susanne Kling agrees all proj- Donautal-Aktiv justifies her active commit- as alternate hosts. Soil and nutrient con- ect activities with the owners and users ment to these rare animals. The streams tamination, water pollution and the drying of the area, applies for funding from con- Nebelbach, Klosterbach and Brunnenbach up of stream sections are having a nega- servation, agricultural or water manage- actually have significant stocks of river tive impact on the river mussel and other ment funds and oversees implementation. mussels on a European scale. That is why water inhabitants. Local authorities are responsible for main- their interconnected flowing water system taining small waterbodies. Susanne Kling has been designated a European nature n order to keep streams in their advises them how to keep the streams protection site. The landscape planner and “Inatural state, we have to consider clear sustainably and improve their eco- her team have been taking especial care the whole catchment area and make a logical value. This means they can also of them for three years now and receive lot of adjustments” Susanne Kling ex- contribute to flood prevention. monies from conservation funds of the plains. Man-made obstructions have to Free State of Bavaria. be removed and natural elements such as ince agricultural use of the land in the stones and tree trunks brought in so that S catchment area can have a negative The river mussel is The river mussel needs clear flowing water and Checking progress at the stream: Susanne Kling threatened with extinction a sandy, gravelly bed. and volunteer Leo Schaudi inspect the river and is under strict protection. mussels. Susanne Hochwald 11 impact on the quality of water, Susanne some farmers to create riparian strips, use mussels.” For example, when a landslide Kling has started an advisory service for mulching methods for sowing and use silts the water badly, then they have to farmers.
Recommended publications
  • New Concepts for the Suburban Countryside in the Growing Metropolitan Region Munich
    International Master of Landscape Architecture GLONN VALLEY New Concepts for the Suburban Countryside in the growing Metropolitan Region Munich PROJECT DOCUMENTATION International Master of Landscape Architecture GLONNVALLEY New Concepts for the Suburban Countryside in the growing Metropolitan Region Munich Project Documentation IMLA - Main Project I / 1st Semester 2018 IMLA - International Master of Landscape Architecture Weihenstephan-Triesdorf University of Applied Sciences, Freising (Germany) Nürtingen-Geislingen University, Nürtingen (Germany) www.imla-campus.eu Glonnvalley (Source: Andreas Kitzberger) INTRODUCTION Prof. Fritz Auweck Frame conditions and This has very big influence on the The Glonnvalley is characterised by: student composition space because of the need of areas for • rural character The project was the task of the so-called settlements and infrastructure, the need of • long history - which is implemented in „Main Project I“, a module in the first new housing for people and possibilities of settlements, landscape and traditions semester of the master programme mobility and recreation in the landscape. • high and regional specific landscape „International Master of Landscape At the moment the planning region 14 quality in the Glonnvalley as well as in Architecture“ (IMLA) in summer semester has about 2.85 million inhabitants (2015) the neighbouring valleys 2018. and will grow until 2035 more than 12.5% • regional types of settlements and This master programme is operated (min. 3.2 million inhabitants). buildings, including farmhouses and by the Universities of Applied Sciences religious buildings Weihenstephan-Triesdorf (HSWT) and Regional Plan Region 14 • renewable energy production, Nürtingen-Geislingen (HfWU). The state regional plan 14 includes the intensive agriculture and regional About 30 students from about 20 different regional state targets for the development marketing countries (from Asia, America, Middle East of the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Regionales Naturschutzkonzept Für Den Forstbetrieb Wasserburg Am Inn
    Regionales Naturschutzkonzept für den Forstbetrieb Wasserburg am Inn Stand: Mai 2013 Naturschutzkonzept Forstbetrieb Wasserburg 1 Verantwortlich für die Erstellung Bayerische Staatsforsten Bayerische Staatsforsten Zentrale Forstbetrieb Wasserburg Bereich Waldbau, Naturschutz, Jagd und Fischerei Salzburger Straße 14 Naturschutzspezialist Klaus Huschik 83512 Wasserburg Hindenburgstraße 30 Tel.: 08071 - 9236- 0 83646 Bad Tölz [email protected] Hinweis Alle Inhalte dieses Naturschutzkonzeptes, insbesondere Texte, Tabellen und Abbildungen sind urheberrechtlich geschützt (Copyright). Das Urheberrecht liegt, soweit nicht ausdrücklich anders gekennzeichnet, bei den Bayeri- schen Staatsforsten. Nachdruck, Vervielfältigung, Veröffentlichung und jede andere Nutzung bedürfen der vorherigen Zustimmung des Urhebers. Wer das Urheberrecht verletzt, unterliegt der zivilrechtlichen Haftung gem. §§ 97 ff. Urheberrechtsgesetz und kann sich gem. §§ 106 ff. Urheberrechtsgesetz strafbar machen. Naturschutzkonzept Forstbetrieb Wasserburg 2 Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Zusammenfassung ............................................................................................... 5 2 Allgemeines zum Forstbetrieb Wasserburg ....................................................... 7 2.1 Kurzcharakteristik für den Naturraum .................................................................................... 8 2.2 Ziele der Waldbewirtschaftung ............................................................................................... 9 3 Naturschutzfachlicher Teil
    [Show full text]
  • Flyer Zur Tarifstrukturreform
    ALLE REGIONALBUS-LINIEN Der IM MVV neue Tarif Ingolstadt, Treuchtlingen, Nürnberg Puttenhausen Mainburg (683) kommt nach 602 603 683 Margarethenried Gammelsdorf Schweitenkirchen Osterwaal Rudelzhausen (501) Niernsdorf Letten Hebronts- Grafen- Hörgerts- Nieder-/ 617 603 Weitenwinterried Oberdorf Unter-/ Grünberg 683 683 hausen dorf hausen Mauern Ober- (601) (706) Mitter- Ober-/Unter- Ruderts-/Osselts-/ Paunzhausen Pfettrach (Wang) Burgharting Volkersdorf/ Steinkirchen mar- marbach wohlbach Deutldorf Günzenhausen 602 (707) Dickarting Sulding 707 707 Priel (PAF) bach 616 Tegernbach Ziegelberg Froschbach 603 Ebersberg. (683) Arnberg/ Lauter- 5621 Schernbuch Abens Neuhub (5621) 616 (707) (617) (561) Haag bach Tandern Hilgerts- Schlipps/ Au (i. Hallertau) St. Alban (704) hausen Jetzendorf Eglhausen Sillertshausen Hausmehring Moosburg (501) Arndorf (619) Randelsried 729 Aiterbach Nörting 617 601 (561) 707 Göpperts- Sünz- Attenkirchen Starzell Neuried hausen Unter-/ Gütlsdorf Nandlstadt (680) Schröding Thalhausen Asbach (Altom.) (619) Oberallers- 601 hausen Thalham/ Pottenau Loiting Peters- Oberhaindlfing Kirchamper (5621) (616) hausen 695 616 695 (617) Alsdorf Haarland Oberappersdorf Wollomoos Schmarnzell Ainhofen (561) hausen (785) Hohen- (619) Allers- Tünzhausen/ Ruhpalzing Langenpreising Ramperting Alles wird einfacher und vieles günstiger. (785) Herschen- 695 616 Thonhausen Gerlhausen Hausmehring (Haag) Inkofen (728) Pfaenhofen (Altomünster) Reichertsh. (DAH) Kleinschwab- Fränking 728 hausen Göttschlag 617 782 kammer 704 (785) hofen Kirchdorf
    [Show full text]
  • Melinda DE ENG 1.11 Mb
    PILOT PROJECT: Car-Pooling in the District of Ebersberg: Network of Hitchhiking Benches JOIN US! PILOT PROJECT PARTNER/s CONTACT DETAILS: Name of organization: Energieagentur Ebersberg-München gGmbH Email: [email protected] Website: https://www.energieagentur-ebe-m.de Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/energieagenturebem/ MORE INFORMATION ABOUT MELINDA PROJECT: www.alpine-space.eu/projects/melinda https://www.facebook.com/projectmelinda/ https://twitter.com/project_melinda www.alpine-space.eu/melinda Melinda Zloženka DE_ENG.indd 1 9. 03. 2021 10:16:17 ABOUT OUR PILOT TARGET GROUPS AND STAKEHOLDERS (WHO?) PILOT PROJECT STAKEHOLDERS: Energieagentur Ebersberg project partner PILOT AREA DATA (WHERE?) Klimaschutzmanagement Landkreis Ebersberg Ebersberg is a district in the East of the greater Munich area. It is a transition area between the urban and more rural climate protection management of the district surroundings of Munich. It has a population of around 140.000 inhabitants and is among the fastest growing regions in Bavaria. As a part of the region of the public transport service provider MVV, Ebersberg has a decent public transport Mobilitätsforum Landkreis Ebersberg network, but also areas with weaker coverage. well established forum of mobility stakeholders with different thematic working groups Aktionskreis Energiewende Glonn PILOT CHALLENGES (WHY?) first movers in the district when it comes to setting up hitchhiking benches In front of this background, the pilot project aims at improving intermodal mobility options with a focus on the more rural Transition Town Grafing areas of the region. Hitchhiking as a form of transportation and alternative to public transport is not yet established in the first movers in the district when it comes to setting up hitchhiking benches population and a good connection of the hitchhiking benches to other mobility services (information system of the public transport provider; car sharing) is not available yet.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Family Membership and Gender by Club MBR0018 As of December, 2009 Club Fam
    Summary of Family Membership and Gender by Club MBR0018 as of December, 2009 Club Fam. Unit Fam. Unit Club Ttl. Club Ttl. District Number Club Name HH's 1/2 Dues Females Male TOTAL District 111BS 21847 AUGSBURG 0 0 0 35 35 District 111BS 21848 AUGSBURG RAETIA 0 0 1 49 50 District 111BS 21849 BAD REICHENHALL 0 0 2 25 27 District 111BS 21850 BAD TOELZ 0 0 0 36 36 District 111BS 21851 BAD WORISHOFEN MINDELHEIM 0 0 0 43 43 District 111BS 21852 PRIEN AM CHIEMSEE 0 0 0 36 36 District 111BS 21853 FREISING 0 0 0 48 48 District 111BS 21854 FRIEDRICHSHAFEN 0 0 0 43 43 District 111BS 21855 FUESSEN ALLGAEU 0 0 1 33 34 District 111BS 21856 GARMISCH PARTENKIRCHEN 0 0 0 45 45 District 111BS 21857 MUENCHEN GRUENWALD 0 0 1 43 44 District 111BS 21858 INGOLSTADT 0 0 0 62 62 District 111BS 21859 MUENCHEN ISARTAL 0 0 1 27 28 District 111BS 21860 KAUFBEUREN 0 0 0 33 33 District 111BS 21861 KEMPTEN ALLGAEU 0 0 0 45 45 District 111BS 21862 LANDSBERG AM LECH 0 0 1 36 37 District 111BS 21863 LINDAU 0 0 2 33 35 District 111BS 21864 MEMMINGEN 0 0 0 57 57 District 111BS 21865 MITTELSCHWABEN 0 0 0 42 42 District 111BS 21866 MITTENWALD 0 0 0 31 31 District 111BS 21867 MUENCHEN 0 0 0 35 35 District 111BS 21868 MUENCHEN ARABELLAPARK 0 0 0 32 32 District 111BS 21869 MUENCHEN-ALT-SCHWABING 0 0 0 34 34 District 111BS 21870 MUENCHEN BAVARIA 0 0 0 31 31 District 111BS 21871 MUENCHEN SOLLN 0 0 0 29 29 District 111BS 21872 MUENCHEN NYMPHENBURG 0 0 0 32 32 District 111BS 21873 MUENCHEN RESIDENZ 0 0 0 22 22 District 111BS 21874 MUENCHEN WUERMTAL 0 0 0 31 31 District 111BS 21875
    [Show full text]
  • Naturräumlich-Ökologische Analyse Der Flechtenflora Von Deutschland
    624 Herzogia 28 (2) Teil 2, 2015: 624 – 653 Naturräumlich-ökologische Analyse der Flechtenflora von Deutschland Ulf Schiefelbein*, Florian Jansen, Birgit Litterski & Volkmar Wirth Zusammenfassung: Schiefelbein, U., Jansen, F., Litterski, B. & Wirth, V. 2015. Naturräumlich-ökologische Analyse der Flechtenflora von Deutschland. – Herzogia 28: 624 – 653. Die Flechtenflora von Deutschland wird auf der Grundlage der Angaben von Wirth et al. (2013; Die Flechten Deutschlands) analysiert, wobei Naturräume die geografische Basis für die Analysen bilden. Bewertet werden Artendiversität, Exklusivität des Arteninventars, substratspezifische Eigenschaften (Substratbindung, pH-Werte und Nährstoffgehalt/Eutrophierung der besiedelten Substrate) und klimatische Faktoren (Licht, Luftfeuchte). Die artenreichs- ten Naturräume sind nach den Bayerischen Alpen, dem Schwarzwald und Odenwald-Spessart die ebenfalls sehr nieder- schlagsreichen Naturräume Eifel, Weserbergland, Harz, Fränkische Alb, Sauerland und Bayerisch-Böhmischer Wald. Die artenärmsten Landschaften liegen überwiegend im südlichen Teil des Nordostdeutschen Tieflandes. Die Exklusivität des Arteninventars eines Naturraumes wird als Anzahl der Arten, die in Deutschland nach 1950 nur in einem bis zwei Naturräumen nachgewiesen wurden, definiert. In der gesamten Bundesrepublik sind es 638 Arten, davon kommen die meisten in den Bayerischen Alpen, im Schwarzwald, Bayerischen Wald, Odenwald-Spessart und in der Schwäbischen Alb vor. Im gesamten Deutschland überwiegen die Gesteinsbewohner (47,6 % des Gesamtarteninventars),
    [Show full text]
  • Empire of Prints. the Imperial City of Augsburg and the Printed Image In
    OPUS Augsburg 2016 Peter Stoll Empire of Prints The Imperial City of Augsburg and the Printed Image in the 17th and 18th Centuries1 Detail from the frontispiece to David Langenmantel’s Historie des Regiments in des Heil. Röm. Reichs Stadt Augspurg (Augsburg 1734); engraving by Jakob Andreas Friedrich: Augsburg city hall; on top of the cartouche the pine cone from the city’s coat of arms; to the right the eagle signifying the Holy Roman Empire. 1 This text, in a Spanish translation, first served as one of the introductory essays in an exhibition catalogue dealing with Augsburg prints as modellos for baroque paintings in Quito, Ecuador (‘El imperio del grabado: La ciudad imperial de Augsburgo y la imagen impresa en los siglos XVII y XVIII’, in: Almerindo E. Ojeda, Alfonso Ortiz Crespo [ed.]: De Augsburgo a Quito: fuentes grabadas del arte jesuita quiteño del siglo XVIII, Quito 2015, pp. 17-66). For the present purpose, all passages of the text which only made sense in the context of the exhibition have been removed. Nonetheless, the 18th century bias of the text as well as the selection of artists which come under closer scrutiny still reflect the origins of the essay. As it was meant to address not only art historians, but also a general interest readership, it contains much basic information about print- making and the cultural history of Augsburg. OPUS Augsburg 2016 / Stoll, Empire of Prints 2 _______________________________________________________________________________________ A very particular type of factory When in 2001 Johan Roger
    [Show full text]
  • Schriftliche Anfrage Der Abgeordneten Ruth Müller SPD Vom 30.07.2019
    18. Wahlperiode 15.11.2019 Drucksache 18/3880 Schriftliche Anfrage der Abgeordneten Ruth Müller SPD vom 30.07.2019 Struktur und Organisation des amtlichen Veterinärwesens und der Lebensmittel- überwachung Bereits im Gutachten des Obersten Rechnungshofs (ORH) „zur Struktur und Organisati- on des amtlichen Veterinärwesens und der Lebensmittelüberwachung“ vom 12.02.2016 wurden eklatante personelle Unterbesetzungen bei den Veterinären in den bayerischen Landratsämtern festgestellt. Ich frage die Staatsregierung: 1. a) Wie viele Veterinärinnen und Veterinäre (Vollzeitstellen) sind an den bayerischen Kreisverwaltungsbehörden beschäftigt (bitte aufgelistet nach Regierungsbezir- ken, kreisfreien Städten und Landkreisen) für die Jahre 2015–2019? b) Welche der unter 1 a genannten Stellen wurden aufgrund des ORH-Gutachtens zusätzlich geschaffen? 2. a) Gibt es eine Stellenberechnung für die Besetzung der Veterinärinnen und Veteri- näre, die den tatsächlichen Tierbestand in der Region berücksichtigt? b) Wenn ja, wie ist der Stellenschlüssel für die einzelnen Verwaltungsbehörden in Soll- und Ist-Stellen (aufgelistet nach Regierungsbezirken, kreisfreien Städten und Landkreisen)? c) Wenn es zwischen Soll- und Ist-Stellen zu einer Diskrepanz kommt, bis wann ist mit einer ausgeglichenen Stellenbesetzung zu rechnen? 3. Wie viele Veterinärstellen sind in Bayern derzeit unbesetzt (aufgelistet nach Re- gierungsbezirken, kreisfreien Städten und Landkreisen)? 4. a) Welche Kreisverwaltungsbehörden haben um Stellenmehrung gebeten (bitte de- taillierte Aufschlüsselung der jeweiligen Ämter mit Datum)? b) Welche Kreisverwaltungsbehörden haben aufgrund ihres Gesuchs tatsächlich zusätzliches Personal erhalten (bitte Personalstärke jeweils mit angeben)? Drucksachen, Plenarprotokolle sowie die Tagesordnungen der Vollversammlung und der Ausschüsse sind im Internet unter www.bayern.landtag.de – Dokumente abrufbar. Die aktuelle Sitzungsübersicht steht unter www.bayern.landtag.de – Aktuelles/Sitzungen/Tagesübersicht zur Verfügung.
    [Show full text]
  • Pilgrimage to Blessed Francis Xavier Seelos' Homeland
    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION INCLUDED IN YOUR VACATION PRICE: TOUR DIRECTOR-The services of a professional, multilingual Tour Director will be provided throughout. MEALS - 9 Breakfasts, 5 Dinners QUALITY HOTELS- Munich: Similar to Sheraton Arabellapark Fussen area – Similar to Hotel Hirsch Salzburg: Similar to NH Salzburg City Vienna: Similar to Hilton Vienna Please note: Hotels mentioned above are not being held. Properties listed are indicative only. While we will make every attempt to secure the named hotel, the group may be accommodated in one of our Globus standard hotels which may not be the same as mentioned. GROUND TRANSPORTATION - Motor coaches are fully air-conditioned everywhere while touring. No use of the motor coach other than as specified in the itinerary. AIRPORT TRANSFERS- One group airport transfer on arrival and departure. If passengers will be arriving at multiple different times throughout the day, additional transfer costs may apply. SIGHTSEEING - Sightseeing as outlined in the itinerary with inside visits (including admission charges) and special features shown in UPPER CASE in the tour description. Sightseeing with local guides where applicable. OTHER- Mass requested in Munich, Fussen, Salzburg and Vienna Price: $2,161.00 per person based on double occupancy. Estimated Air Rate and available upon request $ 1,348.00 PILGRIMAGE TO BLESSED per person Deposit $ 250.00 per person and Final Payment Due February 15, 2019. FRANCIS XAVIER SEELOS' Ask about insurance options and pre paying your gratuities. HOMELAND Interested in finding out more about this trip? Join us for our 10:30 am mass and information event on Sunday September 16, 2018. MAY 1 - MAY 11, 2019 Celebrate the 200th Anniversary of Father Seelos' birth with a pilgrimage through his homeland.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Infant Mortality Decline in Rural and Urban Bavaria
    Infant Mortality Decline in Rural and Urban Bavaria: Sanitary Improvement and Inequality in Bavaria and Munich, 1825-19101 Abstract A high infant mortality regime characterized much of the German Kingdom of Bavaria during the long nineteenth century. Conditions in Munich were reflective of this regime, with 40 deaths per 100 births not uncommon during the early 1860s. Infant mortality in all of Bavaria declined slowly in rural areas until World War I. In urban areas, the decline was much more impressive with the median falling by one-half up to 1913. The decline in Munich was even more dramatic. This paper examines the causes of infant mortality in both Bavaria as a whole and in Munich. The analysis of Bavaria examines district-level data for the period 1880 through 1910. The examination of Munich is for the period 1825-1910, which is a period of substantial economic and social change as well as sanitary reform. Patterns of land distribution, fertility and sanitary provision all play a role in accounting for the decline in infant mortality. The study uncovered growing discrepancies across social groups as decline set in Munich. John C. Brown Department of Economics Clark University Worcester, MA 01610 [email protected] Timothy W. Guinnane Department of Economics Yale University New Haven, CT 06520 [email protected] 1 Please do not quote or cite without permission of the author. Address for correspondence: [email protected] or Department of Economics, Clark University, Worcester, MA 01610-1477. This paper is part of a joint project on demographic change in Bavaria and Munich during the nineteenth century.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Pressemappe Bayerischer Inngau-Trachtenverband E. V
    Pressemappe a Stand: September 2020 EINLEITUNG Der 1903 gegründete Bayerische Inngau-Trachtenverband ist ein Zusammenschluss von 39 Trach- tenvereinen mit ca. 13.500 Mitgliedern. Das Gaugebiet erstreckt sich von Kiefersfelden den Inn ent- lang über Rosenheim, Bad Aibling und Grafing bis nach Rott am Inn und dann wieder von Neuötting bis nach Simbach am Inn. In der Gemeinschaft des Gauverbandes können die Interessen und Anliegen der Trachtlerinnen und Trachtler gegenüber Staat und Gesellschaft gebündelt vertreten werden. Der Inngau-Trachtenverband ist Mitglied im Bayerischen Trachtenverband e. V. – der Dachorganisa- tion der meisten bayerischen Gauverbände – und ein anerkannter Partner und Freund von benachbar- ten Trachten- und Brauchtumsverbänden. Einmal im Jahr feiern wir mit ca. 4.500 Teilnehmern ein großes Gaufest. Hierbei wird der Zusam- menhalt des Gauverbandes demonstriert und der Öffentlichkeit die Vielfalt unserer Trachten und die Lebensfreude unserer Mitglieder präsentiert. Der Gauverband und seine Mitgliedsvereine haben es sich zur Aufgabe gemacht, unsere heimischen Trachten zu erhalten, für unsere bayerische Lebensart einzustehen und besonders auch unsere Jugend für die Liebe zur Heimat und zu unserem Brauchtum zu begeistern. Auf den nachfolgenden Seiten finden Sie die Namen und Kontaktdaten aller Ansprechpartner im Gauausschuss. Ferner geben wir Ihnen einen Überblick über das Gaugebiet und die angeschlossenen Vereine, deren Vorstände und die aktuelle Mitgliederzahl. Die beigefügte Anlage beinhaltet weitergehende Informationen zur Geschichte des Trachtenwesens. Ich hoffe, dass diese Pressemappe zum besseren Verständnis für die Belange der Trachtenbewegung beiträgt und dass der Inhalt zur Beschaffung der gewünschten Informationen dient. Mit trachtlerischem Gruß Georg Schinnagl 1. Gauvorstand GAUVORSTANDSCHAFT Georg Schinnagl 1. Gauvorstand Bach 4, 83104 Tuntenhausen Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuts-Map-DE.Pdf
    GERMANY NUTS 2013 Code NUTS 1 NUTS 2 NUTS 3 DE1 BADEN-WÜRTTEMBERG DE11 Stuttgart DE111 Stuttgart, Stadtkreis DE112 Böblingen DE113 Esslingen DE114 Göppingen DE115 Ludwigsburg DE116 Rems-Murr-Kreis DE117 Heilbronn, Stadtkreis DE118 Heilbronn, Landkreis DE119 Hohenlohekreis DE11A Schwäbisch Hall DE11B Main-Tauber-Kreis DE11C Heidenheim DE11D Ostalbkreis DE12 Karlsruhe DE121 Baden-Baden, Stadtkreis DE122 Karlsruhe, Stadtkreis DE123 Karlsruhe, Landkreis DE124 Rastatt DE125 Heidelberg, Stadtkreis DE126 Mannheim, Stadtkreis DE127 Neckar-Odenwald-Kreis DE128 Rhein-Neckar-Kreis DE129 Pforzheim, Stadtkreis DE12A Calw DE12B Enzkreis DE12C Freudenstadt DE13 Freiburg DE131 Freiburg im Breisgau, Stadtkreis DE132 Breisgau-Hochschwarzwald DE133 Emmendingen DE134 Ortenaukreis DE135 Rottweil DE136 Schwarzwald-Baar-Kreis DE137 Tuttlingen DE138 Konstanz DE139 Lörrach DE13A Waldshut DE14 Tübingen DE141 Reutlingen DE142 Tübingen, Landkreis DE143 Zollernalbkreis DE144 Ulm, Stadtkreis DE145 Alb-Donau-Kreis DE146 Biberach DE147 Bodenseekreis DE148 Ravensburg DE149 Sigmaringen DE2 BAYERN DE21 Oberbayern DE211 Ingolstadt, Kreisfreie Stadt DE212 München, Kreisfreie Stadt DE213 Rosenheim, Kreisfreie Stadt DE214 Altötting DE215 Berchtesgadener Land DE216 Bad Tölz-Wolfratshausen DE217 Dachau DE218 Ebersberg DE219 Eichstätt DE21A Erding DE21B Freising DE21C Fürstenfeldbruck DE21D Garmisch-Partenkirchen DE21E Landsberg am Lech DE21F Miesbach DE21G Mühldorf a. Inn DE21H München, Landkreis DE21I Neuburg-Schrobenhausen DE21J Pfaffenhofen a. d. Ilm DE21K Rosenheim, Landkreis DE21L Starnberg DE21M Traunstein DE21N Weilheim-Schongau DE22 Niederbayern DE221 Landshut, Kreisfreie Stadt DE222 Passau, Kreisfreie Stadt DE223 Straubing, Kreisfreie Stadt DE224 Deggendorf DE225 Freyung-Grafenau DE226 Kelheim DE227 Landshut, Landkreis DE228 Passau, Landkreis DE229 Regen DE22A Rottal-Inn DE22B Straubing-Bogen DE22C Dingolfing-Landau DE23 Oberpfalz DE231 Amberg, Kreisfreie Stadt DE232 Regensburg, Kreisfreie Stadt DE233 Weiden i.
    [Show full text]