DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter 1 Introduction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chapter 1 Introduction Notes Abbreviations used in notes CAB Cabinet Papers ES Ministerial Committee on Economic Strategy EUS Ministerial Committee on European Strategy FCO Foreign and Commonwealth Office FV Department of Trade and Industry PREM Prime Minister’s Office T Treasury TFIA Files released by the Treasury under the Freedom of Information Act Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Stephen George, An Awkward Partner: Britain in the European Community (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998). For the overview of British and French policy towards European integration, see Andrew Geddes, The European Union and British Politics (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004); John W. Young, Britain and European Unity 1945–1999 (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 2000); Hugo Young, This Blessed Plot: Britain and Europe from Churchill to Blair (London: Macmillan, 1998); and Alain Guyomarch, Howard Machin and Ella Ritchie, France in the European Union (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1998). 2 The Hague European summit of 1969 commissioned the Werner Committee to draw up a report on EMU. See Werner Report, ‘Report to the Council and Com- mission on the Realization by Stages of Economic and Monetary Union in the Community’, Supplement to Bulletin of the European Communities, No. 11, 1970. 3 European Council, ‘Resolution of the European Council of 5 December 1978 on the Establishment of the European Monetary System and related Matters’, Bulletin of the European Communities, No. 12, 1978. 4 Alec Cairncross, ‘The Heath Government and the British Economy’, in Stuart Ball and Anthony Seldon (eds), The Heath Government 1970–74: A Reappraisal (London: Longman, 1996), 132. 5 On EMU in the 1970s, see Loukas Tsoukalis, The Politics and Economics of the European Monetary Integration (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1978). For a historical account of the process which culminated in the establishment of the EMS, see Peter Ludlow, The Making of the European Monetary System: A Case Study of the Politics of the European Community (London: Butterworth, 1982). Kenneth Dyson and Kevin Featherstone, The Road to Maastricht: Negotiating Economic and Monetary Union (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999) is a monumental work on the entire history of European monetary integration after the Second World War and should be the starting point for a scholar of later generations. David Marsh, The Euro: The Politics of the New Global Currency (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009) is also a very informative book on the history and prospects of the single currency. 199 200 Notes 6 Dean Acheson, ‘Extract from a Speech at West Point’, in Ian S. McDonald (ed.), Anglo-American Relations since the Second World War (Newton Abbot: David & Charles, 1974), 181–2. 7 Ernest Haas, The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social, and Economic Forces, 1950–1957 (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1958); Andrew Moravcsik, The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht (London: UCL Press, 1998). 8 David Reynolds, ‘A “Special Relationship”? America, Britain and the Inter- national Order since the Second World War’, International Affairs, 62(1) (1986), 2. 9 Allan Bullock, Ernest Bevin: A Biography (new edn; London: Politico’s, 2002). For a revisionist view, see John W. Young, Britain, France and the Unity of Europe 1945–51 (Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1984). 10 Michael Charlton, The Price of Victory (London: British Broadcasting Corporation, 1983). 11 Wolfgang Kaiser, Using Europe, Abusing the Europeans: Britain and European Integration, 1945–63 (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1996), 130; N. Piers Ludlow, Dealing with Britain: The Six and the First UK Application to the EEC (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), 30. 12 Cmnd 4715, The United Kingdom and the European Communities (London: HMSO, 1971), paragraph 35. 13 John W. Young, International Policy (The Labour Governments 1964–70, 2; Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2003), 20. 14 Christopher Hill and Christopher Lord, ‘The Foreign Policy of the Heath Government’, in Stuart Ball and Anthony Seldon (eds), The Heath Government of 1970–74: A Reappraisal (London: Longman, 1996), 305. 15 For France’s European strategy during the early post-war period, see William Hitchcock, France Restored: Cold War Diplomacy and the Quest for Leadership in Europe, 1944–54 (Chapel Hill: University of North California Press, 1998); Michael Sutton, France and the Construction of Europe, 1944–2007: The Geo- political Imperative (Oxford: Berghahn Books, 2007). 16 Compare Frances M. B. Lynch, France and the International Economy: From Vichy to the Treaty of Rome (London: Routledge, 1997), 183 with Peter Mangold, The Almost Impossible Ally: Harold Macmillan and Charles de Gaulle (London: I. B. Tauris, 2006), 82. A more balanced account is available in Alan S. Milward, The Rise and Fall of a National Strategy 1945–63 (The United Kingdom and the European Community, 1; London: Frank Cass, 2002), 252. 17 Mangold, Impossible Ally, 81–2. 18 Sutton, France, Chapter 4. 19 As for French policy towards NATO, see Frédéric Bozo, ‘Détente versus Alliance: France, the United States and the Politics of the Harmel Report’, Contemporary European History, 7(3) (1998). 20 Marsh, Euro, 41–4. 21 Uwe Kitzinger, Diplomacy and Persuasion: How Britain Joined the Common Market (London: Thames and Hudson, 1973), 38–9. 22 Edward Heath, Old World, New Horizons: Britain, Europe, and the Atlantic Alliance (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1970), 32 pointed out that Britain’s past applications to the EEC had failed because London and Paris had opposing visions on Europe. Notes 201 23 Haig Simonian, The Privileged Partnership: Franco-German Relations in the European Community 1969–1984 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1985), 5. As for the detailed explanation of the Ostpolitik, see Timothy Garton Ash, In Europe’s Name: Germany and the Divided Continent (London: Vintage, 1994). 24 Georges-Henri Soutou, ‘The Linkage between European Integration and Détente: The Contrasting Approaches of de Gaulle and Pompidou’, in Piers Ludlow (ed.), European Integration and the Cold War: Ostpolitik-Westpolitik, 1965–73 (London: Routledge, 2007), 26–9. 25 Jean-Pierre Corcelette and Frédéric Abadie, Georges Pompidou: Le désir et le destin (Paris: Editions Balland, 1994), 337. 26 Ibid. 27 For an instance of this view, see Tsoukalis, European Monetary Integration, 63–81. 28 David J. Howarth, The French Road to European Monetary Union (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2001), 29. 29 Harold James, International Monetary Cooperation Since Bretton Woods (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996), 249. 30 Britain concluded the Basle Agreement with the United States and the other 11 countries, who offered a medium-term dollar credit for Britain. The British government also negotiated bilateral sterling agreements with the sterling area countries. Under the agreements, these countries were obliged to hold a cer- tain proportion of their foreign exchange reserves in sterling. In exchange, Britain agreed to guarantee the value of 90 per cent of their sterling balances in the US dollar. As a consequence of these developments, Britain became financially and therefore politically dependent on the United States. France was not a signatory of the Basle Agreement. 31 Milward, Rise and Fall, Chapters 7, 9 and 10. 32 Susan Strange, Sterling and British Policy: A Political Study of an International Currency in Decline (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1971). See also Alan S. Milward, The Reconstruction of Western Europe 1945–51 (London: Routledge, 1984), 237–8; Kaiser, Using Europe, 41; Catherine R. Schenk, ‘The UK, the Sterling Area, and the EEC, 1957–63’, in Anne Deighton and Alan S. Milward (eds), Widening, Deepening and Acceleration: The European Economic Community 1957–63 (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag, 1999), 123–37. 33 Simonian, Partnership, 19. 34 Lynch, France, 186–209. 35 Charles de Gaulle, Mémoires d’espoir (Le renouveau, 1958–1962, 1; Paris: Plon, 1970), 23. 36 Douglas Hurd, Memoirs (London: Little, Brown & Company, 2003), 198; Jean- René Bernard, ‘Britain into Europe’, in Richard Mayne, Douglas Johnson and Robert Tombs (eds), Cross Channel Currents: 100 Years of the Entente Cordiale (London: Routledge, 2004), 171. 37 Tsoukalis, European Monetary Integration, 33. 38 Ludlow, European Monetary System, 159–61. 39 Moravcsik, Choice for Europe, 291. 40 As for the historical background of these hostilities, see Jack Hayward, ‘France and the United Kingdom: The Dilemmas of Integration and National 202 Notes Democracy’, in Jeffrey Anderson (ed.), Regional Integration and Democracy: Expanding on the European Experience (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 1999); Sudhir Hazareesingh, Political Traditions in Modern France (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994), Chapter 5. 41 Tsoukalis, European Monetary Integration, 33, 37–8. 42 Philip Lynch, The Politics of Nationhood: Sovereignty, Britishness and Conservative Politics (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1999), 39–41. 43 Anthony Forster, Euroscepticism in Contemporary British Politics: Opposition to Europe in the British Conservative and Labour Parties since 1945 (London: Routledge, 2002), 40. 44 Sudhir Hazareesingh, ‘Vincent Wright and the Jacobin Legacy in Historical and Theoretical Perspective’, in Sudhir Hazareesingh (ed.), The Jacobin Legacy in Modern France: Essays in Honour of Vincent Wright (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), 6. 45 Andrew Knapp, Gaullism since de Gaulle (Aldershot: Dartmouth, 1994). 46 Michael Newman, Socialism and European Unity: The Dilemma of the Left in Britain and France (London: Junction
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 'Opposition-Craft': an Evaluative Framework for Official Opposition Parties in the United Kingdom Edward Henry Lack Submitte
    ‘Opposition-Craft’: An Evaluative Framework for Official Opposition Parties in the United Kingdom Edward Henry Lack Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of PhD The University of Leeds, School of Politics and International Studies May, 2020 1 Intellectual Property and Publications Statements The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. ©2020 The University of Leeds and Edward Henry Lack The right of Edward Henry Lack to be identified as Author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 2 Acknowledgements Page I would like to thank Dr Victoria Honeyman and Dr Timothy Heppell of the School of Politics and International Studies, The University of Leeds, for their support and guidance in the production of this work. I would also like to thank my partner, Dr Ben Ramm and my parents, David and Linden Lack, for their encouragement and belief in my efforts to undertake this project. Finally, I would like to acknowledge those who took part in the research for this PhD thesis: Lord David Steel, Lord David Owen, Lord Chris Smith, Lord Andrew Adonis, Lord David Blunkett and Dame Caroline Spelman. 3 Abstract This thesis offers a distinctive and innovative framework for the study of effective official opposition politics in the United Kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • Discussing What Prime Ministers Are For
    Discussing what Prime Ministers are for PETER HENNESSY New Labour has a lot to answer for on this front. They On 13 October 2014, Lord Hennessy of Nympsfield FBA, had seen what the press was doing to John Major from Attlee Professor of Contemporary British History at Queen Black Wednesday onwards – relentless attacks on him, Mary, University of London, delivered the first British which bothered him deeply.1 And they were determined Academy Lecture in Politics and Government, on ‘What that this wouldn’t happen to them. So they went into are Prime Ministers for?’ A video recording of the lecture the business of creating permanent rebuttal capabilities. and an article published in the Journal of the British Academy If somebody said something offensive about the can be found via www.britishacademy.ac.uk/events/2014/ Government on the Today programme, they would make every effort to put it right by the World at One. They went The following article contains edited extracts from the into this kind of mania of permanent rebuttal, which question and answer session that followed the lecture. means that you don’t have time to reflect before reacting to events. It’s arguable now that, if the Government doesn’t Do we expect Prime Ministers to do too much? react to events immediately, other people’s versions of breaking stories (circulating through social media etc.) I think it was 1977 when the Procedure Committee in will make the pace, and it won’t be able to get back on the House of Commons wanted the Prime Minister to be top of an issue.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Political Economy of Trade: Understanding the Treatment of Non-Tariff Measures in European Union Trade Policy
    The London School of Economics and Political Science The New Political Economy of Trade: Understanding the Treatment of Non-Tariff Measures in European Union Trade Policy Elitsa Garnizova A thesis submitted to the Department of International Relations of the London School of Economics for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, London, November 2018 Page 1 of 324 Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the MPhil/ PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me, and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of 115,854 words; 99,109 excluding Table of Contents, Bibliography and Appendices. Statement of use of third party for editorial help I can confirm that Chapter 1 was copy edited for conventions of language, spelling, and grammar by Bregtje Kamphuis, and Chapters 2 and 3 were edited by Dr Marina Cino-Pagliarello. Page 2 of 324 Abstract Non-tariff measures have become a central topic to the debate of how international trade rules and domestic regulatory choices are to co-exist.
    [Show full text]
  • New Labour, Old Morality
    New Labour, Old Morality. In The IdeasThat Shaped Post-War Britain (1996), David Marquand suggests that a useful way of mapping the „ebbs and flows in the struggle for moral and intellectual hegemony in post-war Britain‟ is to see them as a dialectic not between Left and Right, nor between individualism and collectivism, but between hedonism and moralism which cuts across party boundaries. As Jeffrey Weeks puts it in his contribution to Blairism and the War of Persuasion (2004): „Whatever its progressive pretensions, the Labour Party has rarely been in the vanguard of sexual reform throughout its hundred-year history. Since its formation at the beginning of the twentieth century the Labour Party has always been an uneasy amalgam of the progressive intelligentsia and a largely morally conservative working class, especially as represented through the trade union movement‟ (68-9). In The Future of Socialism (1956) Anthony Crosland wrote that: 'in the blood of the socialist there should always run a trace of the anarchist and the libertarian, and not to much of the prig or the prude‟. And in 1959 Roy Jenkins, in his book The Labour Case, argued that 'there is a need for the state to do less to restrict personal freedom'. And indeed when Jenkins became Home Secretary in 1965 he put in a train a series of reforms which damned him in they eyes of Labour and Tory traditionalists as one of the chief architects of the 'permissive society': the partial decriminalisation of homosexuality, reform of the abortion and obscenity laws, the abolition of theatre censorship, making it slightly easier to get divorced.
    [Show full text]
  • Leadership and Change: Prime Ministers in the Post-War World - Alec Douglas-Home Transcript
    Leadership and Change: Prime Ministers in the Post-War World - Alec Douglas-Home Transcript Date: Thursday, 24 May 2007 - 12:00AM PRIME MINISTERS IN THE POST-WAR WORLD: ALEC DOUGLAS-HOME D.R. Thorpe After Andrew Bonar Law's funeral in Westminster Abbey in November 1923, Herbert Asquith observed, 'It is fitting that we should have buried the Unknown Prime Minister by the side of the Unknown Soldier'. Asquith owed Bonar Law no posthumous favours, and intended no ironic compliment, but the remark was a serious under-estimate. In post-war politics Alec Douglas-Home is often seen as the Bonar Law of his times, bracketed with his fellow Scot as an interim figure in the history of Downing Street between longer serving Premiers; in Bonar Law's case, Lloyd George and Stanley Baldwin, in Home's, Harold Macmillan and Harold Wilson. Both Law and Home were certainly 'unexpected' Prime Ministers, but both were also 'under-estimated' and they made lasting beneficial changes to the political system, both on a national and a party level. The unexpectedness of their accessions to the top of the greasy pole, and the brevity of their Premierships (they were the two shortest of the 20th century, Bonar Law's one day short of seven months, Alec Douglas-Home's two days short of a year), are not an accurate indication of their respective significance, even if the precise details of their careers were not always accurately recalled, even by their admirers. The Westminster village is often another world to the general public. Stanley Baldwin was once accosted on a train from Chequers to London, at the height of his fame, by a former school friend.
    [Show full text]
  • Sir Alan Campbell Interviewed by Jane Barder 19/1/96 Typed by Jeremy Wiltshire 10/6/96
    Contents of interview Entry to Foreign Office, 1946. p 2 Service under Lord Killearn, Singapore; marriage, 1947-48. pp 2-4 Private Secretary to PUS William Strang, 1950-53. pp 5-6 Head of Chancery, Rome, 1952-55: Trieste problem; pp 6-8 Communist threat. Head of Chancery, Peking, 1955-57: role of Head of Chancery; pp 8-12 relations with Chinese; recognition problem; anti-British demonstrations at time of Suez; schooling of children. Imperial Defence College, 1958. pp 12-13 News Department, 1958-60; comments on Selwyn Lloyd, pp 13-17 Hoyer-Millar, Macmillan and aftermath of Suez. Counsellor and Head of Chancery, New York (UN), 1961-65; pp 17-23 death of Hammarskjold; anti-Imperialist feeling; Lord Caradon (political appointees to diplomatic posts). Comments on Alec Douglas-Home. p 23 Western European Department at FO, 1965-67. pp 23-24 Counsellor and Head of Chancery, Paris, 1967-69; appointment pp 24-25 to post; EEC. Ambassador to Addis Ababa, 1969-72; Haile Selassie; Idi Amin; pp 25-28 growth of sedition in Ethiopia. Deputy Under-Secretary, FO, 1974-76; effective “Political pp 28-32 Director”; foreign policy talks with other EEC members; commercial competition with EEC states; co-ordination of EEC foreign policy. Concluding comments on: international civil servants; women pp 32-35 in diplomatic service; merger of CRO and FO; spending cuts in late 1970’s; David Owen as Foreign Secretary. 1 Sir Alan Campbell Interviewed by Jane Barder 19/1/96 Typed by Jeremy Wiltshire 10/6/96 An interview between Sir Alan Campbell and Jane Barder, at his flat in London.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This Publication
    ASEF PUBLIC DIPLOMACY HANDBOOK HOW TO WIN HEARTS AND MINDS Published by: Asia-Europe Foundation (ASEF) 31 Heng Mui Keng Terrace Singapore 119595 Editors: Ms Rebecca STETTER Ms Sunkyoung LEE Contributing Editor: Mr Richard WERLY © Asia-Europe Foundation (ASEF) 2016 The electronic version of the ASEF Public Diplomacy Handbook, “How to Win Hearts and Minds” shall be licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDeriviatives 4.0 International License. This means that non-commercial use of text or parts of texts for educational purposes is allowed; however, one must attribute the work both to the individual authors and to the publisher, including ASEF’s URL (www. asef.org). More information about this license can be found at http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. The views expressed in this volume are the sole responsibility of the authors and can under no circumstances be attributed as the views of the Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM), ASEF, or the editors of this handbook. This publication has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union. The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of the speakers and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the European Union. This project is co-funded by the European Union. ASEF PUBLIC DIPLOMACY HANDBOOK HOW TO win hearts and minds ASEF Public Diplomacy Handbook Asia-Europe Foundation (ASEF) ASEF promotes understanding, strengthens relationships and facilitates cooperation among the people, institutions and organisations of Asia and Europe. ASEF enhances dialogue, enables exchanges and encourages collaboration across the thematic areas of culture, economy, education, governance, public health and sustainable development.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 50 Years Arguing with Neighbours: the UK's Complex
    Chapter 3 50 years Arguing with Neighbours: The UK’s Complex Relationship with the European Union Anne Wesemann Abstract 1969 determined the UK’s fate as an European Union (EU) Member State. Finally, with the ‘cock’ who crowed ‘NON’ twice making way, the route was clear for the UK to join the then European Community. The UK became a Member State in 1973 but it was neither smooth sailing to get to that point nor has it been since. The early years of membership were marked by doubts over the nature of the developing communities and the role the UK would be playing in that development were it to leave or remain. This led to a first UK referendum in 1975 on membership which confirmed the UK government’s decision to join. Forty-one years later, a second referendum decided the UK should leave and paved the way to a slow exit. In between lay numerous economic crisis and domestic as well as international political challenges. As the last full year of UK EU Membership, 2019 marks an end to a struggling ‘ever closer’ relationship. This chapter will shed some light on the 50 years of struggle between the what is now the European Union and the UK. It will draw on historical, political, economic and legal perspectives in examining the relationship. It will present an overview of the humble beginnings of the EU and the UK’s role in that, and the relationship’s stormy youth, when the world faced a global economic crisis. This chapter will examine whether the UK was being led or was leading in key matters of EU policy and law; in doing so it will consider arguments around sovereignty, or rather what there was to gain back after 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • 39 Mcnally Radice Friends and Rivals Review
    REVIEWS the result is a refreshing mix Dr Tim Benson is Director of the that makes fascinating reading Political Cartoon Society, an organi- for anyone interested in cur- sation for those interested in history rent affairs, one which will also and politics through the medium of be appreciated by students of cartoons. politics, history, journalism and Visit www.politicalcartoon.co.uk cartoon art. When personal ambitions collide, mutual co-operation is precluded Giles Radice: Friends and Rivals: Crosland, Jenkins and Healey (Little, Brown & Co., 2002), 382 pp. Reviewed by Tom McNally et us start with the con- narrative parallels Dangerfield’s clusion. Giles Radice has The Strange Death of Liberal Eng- Lwritten an important land in seeking to explain how book, a very readable book and both a political establishment and one that entirely justifies the a political philosophy lost its way. many favourable reviews it has I watched this story unfold received since its publication in first of all as a Labour Party re- September 2002. By the device searcher in the mid- and late them. In that respect Tony Blair of interweaving the careers and sixties, then as International Sec- and Gordon Brown did learn the ambitions of Anthony Crosland, retary of the Labour Party from lessons of history by cementing Roy Jenkins and Denis Healey, 1969–74 (the youngest since their own non-aggression pact, Radice is able to tell the tale of Denis Healey, who served in the and reaped their full reward for the rise and fall of social democ- post from 1945–52), followed by so doing.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Book (PDF)
    01-Titelei.Buch : 01-Titelei 1 11-05-19 13:21:24 -po1- Benutzer fuer PageOne Veröffentlichungen des Deutschen Historischen Instituts London Publications of the German Historical Institute London 01-Titelei.Buch : 01-Titelei 2 11-05-19 13:21:25 -po1- Benutzer fuer PageOne Veröffentlichungen des Deutschen Historischen Instituts London Herausgegeben von Hagen Schulze Band 53 Publications of the German Historical Institute London Edited by Hagen Schulze Volume 53 R. Oldenbourg Verlag München 2002 01-Titelei.Buch : 01-Titelei 3 11-05-19 13:21:25 -po1- Benutzer fuer PageOne Dominik Geppert Thatchers konservative Revolution Der Richtungswandel der britischen Tories 1975–1979 R. Oldenbourg Verlag München 2002 01-Titelei.Buch : 01-Titelei 4 11-05-19 13:21:25 -po1- Benutzer fuer PageOne Meinen Eltern Die Deutsche Bibliothek – CIP-Einheitsaufnahme Geppert, Dominik: Thatchers konservative Revolution : der Richtungswandel der britischen Tories 1975 - 1979 / Dominik Geppert. - München : Oldenbourg, 2002 (Veröffentlichungen des Deutschen Historischen Instituts London ; Bd. 53) Zugl.: Berlin, Freie Univ., Diss., 2000 ISBN 3-486-56661-X © 2002 Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag GmbH, München Rosenheimer Straße 145, D - 81671 München Internet: http://www.oldenbourg-verlag.de Das Werk einschließlich aller Abbildungen ist urheberrechtlich geschützt. Jede Ver- wertung außerhalb der Grenzen des Urheberrechtsgesetzes ist ohne Zustimmung des Verlages unzulässig und strafbar. Dies gilt insbesondere für Vervielfältigungen, Über- setzungen, Mikroverfilmungen und die Einspeicherung und Bearbeitung in elektroni- schen Systemen. Umschlaggestaltung: Dieter Vollendorf, München Gedruckt auf säurefreiem, alterungsbeständigem Papier (chlorfrei gebleicht). Gesamtherstellung: R. Oldenbourg Graphische Betriebe Druckerei GmbH, München ISBN 3-486-56661-X 01-Titelei.Buch : 02-Inhalt 5 11-05-19 13:21:25 -po1- Benutzer fuer PageOne Inhalt 5 INHALT EINLEITUNG...............................
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of HM Embassy in Washington
    The Role of HM Embassy in Washington edited by Gillian Staerck and Michael D. Kandiah ICBH Witness Seminar Programme The Role of HM Embassy in Washington ICBH Witness Seminar Programme Programme Director: Dr Michael D. Kandiah © Institute of Contemporary British History, 2002 All rights reserved. This material is made available for use for personal research and study. We give per- mission for the entire files to be downloaded to your computer for such personal use only. For reproduction or further distribution of all or part of the file (except as constitutes fair dealing), permission must be sought from ICBH. Published by Institute of Contemporary British History Institute of Historical Research School of Advanced Study University of London Malet St London WC1E 7HU ISBN: 1 871348 83 8 The Role of HM Embassy in Washington Held 18 June 1997 in the Map Room, Foreign & Commonwealth Office Chaired by Lord Wright of Richmond Seminar edited by Gillian Staerck and Michael D. Kandiah Institute of Contemporary British History Contents Contributors 9 Citation Guidance 11 The Role of HM Embassy in Washington 13 edited by Gillian Staerck and Michael D. Kandiah Contributors Editors: GILLIAN STAERCK Institute of Contemporary British History DR MICHAEL KANDIAH Institute of Contemporary British History Chair: LORD WRIGHT OF Private Secretary to Ambassador and later First Secretary, Brit- RICHMOND ish Embassy, Washington 1960-65, and Permanent Under-Sec- retary and Head of Diplomatic Service, FCO 1986-91. Paper-giver DR MICHAEL F HOPKINS Liverpool Hope University College. Witnesses: SIR ANTONY ACLAND GCMG, GCVO. British Ambassador, Washington 1986-91. PROFESSOR KATHLEEN University College, University of London.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A: Non-Executive Directors of Channel 4 1981–92
    Appendix A: Non-Executive Directors of Channel 4 1981–92 The Rt. Hon. Edmund Dell (Chairman 1981–87) Sir Richard Attenborough (Deputy Chairman 1981–86) (Director 1987) (Chairman 1988–91) George Russell (Deputy Chairman 1 Jan 1987–88) Sir Brian Bailey (1 July 1985–89) (Deputy Chairman 1990) Sir Michael Bishop CBE (Deputy Chairman 1991) (Chairman 1992–) David Plowright (Deputy Chairman 1992–) Lord Blake (1 Sept 1983–87) William Brown (1981–85) Carmen Callil (1 July 1985–90) Jennifer d’Abo (1 April 1986–87) Richard Dunn (1 Jan 1989–90) Greg Dyke (11 April 1988–90) Paul Fox (1 July 1985–87) James Gatward (1 July 1984–89) John Gau (1 July 1984–88) Roger Graef (1981–85) Bert Hardy (1992–) Dr Glyn Tegai Hughes (1983–86) Eleri Wynne Jones (22 Jan 1987–90) Anne Lapping (1 Jan 1989–) Mary McAleese (1992–) David McCall (1981–85) John McGrath (1990–) The Hon. Mrs Sara Morrison (1983–85) Sir David Nicholas CBE (1992–) Anthony Pragnell (1 July 1983–88) Usha Prashar (1991–) Peter Rogers (1982–91) Michael Scott (1 July 1984–87) Anthony Smith (1981–84) Anne Sofer (1981–84) Brian Tesler (1981–85) Professor David Vines (1 Jan 1987–91) Joy Whitby (1981–84) 435 Appendix B: Channel 4 Major Programme Awards 1983–92 British Academy of Film and Television Arts (BAFTA) 1983: The Snowman – Best Children’s Programme – Drama 1984: Another Audience With Dame Edna – Best Light Entertainment 1987: Channel 4 News – Best News or Outside Broadcast Coverage 1987: The Lowest of the Low – Special Award for Foreign Documentary 1987: Network 7 – Special Award for Originality
    [Show full text]