Vernon A. Walters: Pathfinder of the Intelligence Profession
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Dilemma of NATO Strategy, 1949-1968 a Dissertation Presented
The Dilemma of NATO Strategy, 1949-1968 A dissertation presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Robert Thomas Davis II August 2008 © 2008 Robert Thomas Davis II All Rights Reserved ii This dissertation titled The Dilemma of NATO Strategy, 1949-1968 by ROBERT THOMAS DAVIS II has been approved for the Department of History and the College of Arts and Sciences by ______________________________ Peter John Brobst Associate Professor of History ______________________________ Benjamin M. Ogles Dean, College of Arts and Sciences iii Abstract DAVIS, ROBERT THOMAS II, Ph.D., August 2008, History The Dilemma of NATO Strategy, 1949-1968 (422 pp.) Director of Dissertation: Peter John Brobst This study is a reappraisal of the strategic dilemma of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization in the Cold War. This dilemma revolves around the problem of articulating a strategic concept for a military alliance in the nuclear era. NATO was born of a perceived need to defend Western Europe from a Soviet onslaught. It was an imperative of the early alliance to develop a military strategy and force posture to defend Western Europe should such a war break out. It was not long after the first iteration of strategy took shape than the imperative for a military defense of Europe receded under the looming threat of thermonuclear war. The advent of thermonuclear arsenals in both the United States and Soviet Union brought with it the potential destruction of civilization should war break out. This realization made statesmen on both sides of the Iron Curtain undergo what has been referred to as an ongoing process of nuclear learning. -
Psychological Operations Principles and Case Studies
Psychological Operations Principles and Case Studies Editor Frank L. Goldstein, Col, USAF Co-editor Benjamin F. Findley, Jr., Col, USAFR Air University. Press Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama September 1996 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Psychological operations : principles and case studies j editor, Frank L. Goldstein ; co-editor, Benjamin F. Findley. p. cm. At head of t.p. : AU Shield. "September 1996 ." 1. Psychological warfare-United States . 2. Psychological warfare-Case studies . 1. Goldstein, Frank L., 1945- . 11. Findley, Benjamin F. UB276.P82 1996 355 .3'434-dc20 96-22817 CIP ISBN 1-58566-016-7 Disclaimer This publication was produced in the Department of Defense school environment in the interest of academic freedom and the advancement of national defense-related concepts . The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the United States government. This publication has been reviewed by security and policy review authorities and is cleared for public release . For Sale by the Superintendent of Documents US Government Printing Office Washington, DC 20402 Contents Essay Page DISCLAIMER -------------------- ii FOREWORD . Lx PREFACE ______________________ xi PART I Nature and Scope of Psychological Operations (PSYOP) Introduction . 3 1 Psychological Operations : An Introduction Col Frank L. Goldstein, USAF Col Daniel W. Jacobowitz, USAF, Retired 2 Strategic Concepts for Military Operations . , 17 Col Fred W. Walker, USAF, Retired 3 No More Tactical Information Detachments: US Military Psychological Operations in Transition . 25 Col Alfred H. Paddock, Jr., USA, Retired 4 Blending Military and Civilian PSYOP Paradigms . -
Wikipedia Subcorpora Tool (Wist) a Tool for Creating Customized Document Collections for Training Unsupervised Models of Lexical Semantics
Wikipedia Subcorpora Tool (WiST) A tool for creating customized document collections for training unsupervised models of lexical semantics Natalia Derbentseva Peter Kwantes DRDC – Toronto Research Centre Simon Dennis University of Newcastle Benjamin Stone Ohio State University Defence Research and Development Canada Scientific Report DRDC-RDDC-2016-R100 June 2016 IMPORTANT INFORMATIVE STATEMENTS This work was sponsored by the Influence Activities Task Force (IATF) and was conducted under project 15AH of the Command and Control thrust (5a). Template in use: (2010) SR Advanced Template_EN (051115).dotm © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of National Defence, 2016 © Sa Majesté la Reine (en droit du Canada), telle que représentée par le ministre de la Défense nationale, 2016 Abstract One of the most important advances in cognitive science over the past 20 years is the invention of computer models that can form semantic representations for words by analysing the patterns with which words are used in documents. Generally speaking, the models need to be ‘trained’ on tens of thousands of documents to form representations that are recognizable as the meaning or ‘gist’ of a term or document. Because the models derive meaning from words’ usage across contexts/documents, the ways that words are used will drive the meaning. In this report, we describe the Wikipedia Subcorpora Tool (WiST), a tool for creating custom document corpora for the purpose of training models of lexical semantics. The tool is unique in that it allows the user to control the kinds of documents that comprise a corpus. For example, one might want to train a model to be an expert on medical topics, so the user can use the WiST to select a collection of medical documents on which to train the model. -
FOIA Logs for the Defense Intelligence Agency for 1999-2005
Description of document: FOIA CASE LOGS for: FOIA Logs for the Defense Intelligence Agency, Washington DC for 1999-2005 Posted date: 09-December-2007 Title of Document All Requests Received Between 01/01/1999 and 12/31/1999, 01/01/2000 and 12/31/2000, 10/01/2001 – 09/30/2002, 10/01/2002 – 09/30/2003, 10/01/2003 – 09/30/2004, 10/01/2004 – 09/30/2005 Date/date range of document: 1999 - 2005 Source of document: Defense Intelligence Agency Building 6000 Washington, DC 20340-5100 ATTN: DIAC, DAN-1A (FOIA) The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file All Requests Received between 01/01/1999 and 12/31/1999 Request 10 Requester Name Request Description Type 0001-1999-5970 ESTEY, Nathan Poland Intelligence Services; FOIA 0003-1999-14145 TROGDON, Gary Poland Intelligence Services; FOIA 0004-1999-14145 TROGDON,Gary Poland Intelligence Services; FOIA 0005-1999-14259 YEMINI, Galit Israel Intelligence Services; FOIA 0006-1999-14145 TROGDON, Gary Israel Intelligence Services; FOIA 0007-1999-8395 WITTNER, Lawrence Radiation and Fallout; Weapons; Conferences & meetings; Country files; FOIA 1- <,rrllin C;q 1 q4q-1 qf)/' 0008-1999-14257 PIKE, David Soviet and German individuals - communist; FOIA 0009-1999-14255 GRIFFITH, Ann "Cold Spot" operations aimed at intercepting No. -
Force Planning Scenarios, 1945-2016
Force Planning Scenarios, 1945 –2016 Their Origins and Use in Defense Strategic Planning Eric V. Larson C O R P O R A T I O N For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR2173z1 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0099-4 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2019 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover: Photo by Angel_a/Getty Images Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface This report documents research and analysis conducted as part of a project titled Defense Planning for a New Era, sponsored by the Quadrennial Defense Review Office, Deputy Chief of Staff (G-8), Headquarters, United States Army. -
Blinders, Blunders, and Wars: What America and China Can Learn
Blinders, Blunders, and Wars What America and China Can Learn David C. Gompert, Hans Binnendijk, Bonny Lin C O R P O R A T I O N ELECTRONIC COPIES OF RAND RESEARCH ARE PROVIDED FOR PERSONAL USE; POSTING TO A NONRAND WEBSITE IS PROHIBITED. THIS PUBLICATION IS AVAILABLE FOR LINKING OR FREE DOWNLOAD AT www.rand.org For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR768 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Gompert, David C. Blinders, blunders, and wars : what America and China can learn / David C. Gompert, Hans Binnendijk, Bonny Lin. pages cm Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 978-0-8330-8777-5 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. War—Decision making—Case studies. 2. Strategy—Case studies. 3. Military history—Case studies. 4. United States —Military policy—Decision making. 5. China— Military policy—Decision making. I. Binnendijk, Hans. II. Lin, Bonny. III. Title. U162.G65 2014 355.02'75—dc23 2014036605 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2014 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover image: German troops surrender to Russian soldiers during World War II (Time Life Pictures, Getty Images/used with permission) Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. -
A History of the Defense Intelligence Agency
THE DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY SEAL The dark blue background of the seal signifies the unknown or the threats and challenges of the world around us. The flaming torch and its gold color, which represents knowledge or intelligence, is lighting our A History of the way to a known world symbolized by the blue-green planet. The eternal search for knowledge and truth is the worldwide mission of the Defense Intelligence Agency. The two red ellipses symbolize the technical aspects DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY of intelligence today and in the future. The 13 stars and the wreath identify the Agency as a Department of Defense organization. DIA Office of Historical Research PCN7308 Contents 1 What is Military Intelligence? 3 Military Intelligence in U.S. History 4 The American Revolution: The Roots of U.S. Military Intelligence “Let us never forget 6 The Civil War: Intelligence in 19th Century Warfare 10 The Spanish-American War: Global Military Intelligence 12 World War I: Expansion and Contraction that good intelligence 14 World War II: From Failure to Triumph 16 Cold War Dilemmas 18 Challenge and Reorganization: The Rise of DIA saves American lives and 22 A Time of Transition 26 DIA Comes of Age protects our freedom.” 32 The Post-Cold War Challenge 36 The 21st Century: Combating Terrorism, Providing Relief 40 The Future of Defense Intelligence 41 Directors of DIA — President Ronald Reagan, 1981 42 The Patriots’ Memorial What is Military Intelligence? Military intelligence is the product of gathering The intelligence process services the need for information about foreign military dispositions, both tactical and strategic intelligence. -
ISA Peter Rodman Briefs Reporters During a Media Roundtable in the Pentagon, August 2001
Cover Photo Captions (Left to right) John Ohly (second from right) confers with Secretary of Defense James Forrestal (seated) and his two other special assistants, Marx Leva and Wilfred McNeil, 1948. (OSD Historical Office) ASD/ISA Peter Rodman briefs reporters during a media roundtable in the Pentagon, August 2001. (Department of Defense) Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara (right) congratulates newly sworn-in Secretary of the Navy Paul Nitze (second from left) and William Bundy (far left), Nitze’s successor as Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Affairs, November 1963. (National Archives) Contents Foreword . v The Early Years . 1 North Atlantic Treaty Organization . 4 Biography . 5 A Period of Reform . .. 7 The Vietnam Commitment . 10 Biography . 12 Years of Consequence . 13 ISA and Arms Control in the 1960s . 18 Biography . 21 A Lower Profile . 23 The “Two Pauls” . 28 Biography . 30 Resurgent Influence . 33 ISP: Dividing the World . 38 Biography . 40 ISA in a Rapidly Changing World . .. 43 Biography . 47 Epilogue . 49 Appendix 1 . 51 Appendix 2 . 53 Notes . 55 Foreword he Office of the Assistant Secretary of TDefense for International Security Affairs has played a central role in shaping the national security policy of the United States since 1949 . As ISA celebrates its 65th birthday and pivots toward the challenges of a new century, this study seeks to impart a shared perspective of the office’s origins, legacy, and future . Its aim is twofold: to spark a deeper appreciation of the organization’s history among its current members and to inform a wider audience of the office’s unique position within the Department of Defense, within the Office of the Secretary of Defense, and within America’s national security bureaucracy more generally .