Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Tuesday, February 19, 2002 Part IV Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 91 Enhanced Security Procedures for Operations at Certain Airports in the Washington, DC Metropolitan Area Special Flight Rules Area; Final Rule VerDate 11<MAY>2000 14:55 Feb 15, 2002 Jkt 197001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\19FER2.SGM pfrm07 PsN: 19FER2 7538 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 33 / Tuesday, February 19, 2002 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202) page at http://www.faa.gov/avr/ 267–8320. armhome.htm or the Government Federal Aviation Administration Questions on security procedures and Printing Office’s web page at http:// obtaining security procedure approval www.access.gpo.gov/su_docs/aces/ 14 CFR Part 91 or waivers: Washington Civil Aviation aces140html. Security Field Office (WAS CASFO), [Docket No. FAA–2002–11580; SFAR 94] You can also get a copy by submitting Washington Dulles International RIN 2120–AH62 Airport, 45005 Aviation Drive Suite 110, a request to the Federal Aviation Washington, DC 20166; telephone (703) Administration, Office of Rulemaking, Enhanced Security Procedures for 661–6070. You can also find guidance ARM–1, 800 Independence Avenue, Operations at Certain Airports in the on drafting security procedures at SW, Washington, DC 20591, or by Washington, DC Metropolitan Area http://cas.faa.gov/usa.html. calling (202) 267–9680. Be sure to Special Flight Rules Area SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: identify the amendment number or AGENCY: Federal Aviation docket number of this final rule. Comments Invited Administration (FAA), DOT. Small Entity Inquiries ACTION: Final rule, request for This final rule is being adopted comments. without prior notice and prior public The Small Business Regulatory comment. The Regulatory Policies and Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA) of SUMMARY: This action requires any Procedures of the Department of 1996 requires the FAA to comply with person operating an aircraft to or from Transportation (DOT) (44 FR 1134; Feb small entity requests for information or College Park Airport (CGS), Potomac 26, 1979) provide that, to the maximum advice about compliance with statutes Airfield (VKX), and Washington extent possible, operating and regulations within the FAA’s Executive/Hyde Field (W32) to conduct administrations for the DOT should jurisdiction. Therefore, any small entity those operations in accordance with provide an opportunity for public that has a question regarding this security procedures approved by the comment on regulations issued without document may contact its local FAA notice. Accordingly, interested persons Administrator. Operations under 14 official. Internet users can find are invited to participate in the CFR part 91 have been prohibited at additional information on SBREFA on rulemaking by submitting written data, these airports as a result of Notices to the FAA’s web page at Airmen (NOTAMs) issued after views, or arguments. Comments relating to the environmental, energy, http:www.faa.gov/avr/arm/sbrefa.htm September 11, 2001. This action is being and send electronic inquiries to the taken to restore aircraft operations at federalism, or economic impact that might result from this amendment also following Internet address: 9-AWA- these airports while attempting to [email protected]. counter possible terrorist threats to the are invited. Comments must include the National Capital region. docket number or amendment number Background DATES: This action is effective February and must be submitted in duplicate to 13, 2002, and shall remain in effect until the address above. All comments After the September 11, 2001, terrorist February 13, 2003. Submit comments by received, as well as a report attacks against four U.S. commercial April 22, 2002. summarizing each substantive public aircraft resulting in the tragic loss of contact with FAA personnel concerning human life at the World Trade Center, ADDRESSES: Address your comments to this rulemaking, will be filed in the the Pentagon, and in southwest the Docket Management System, U.S. public docket. The docket is available Pennsylvania, the FAA immediately Department of Transportation, Room for public inspection before and after prohibited all aircraft operations within Plaza 401, 400 Seventh Street, SW, the comment closing date. the territorial airspace of the United Washington, DC 20590. You must The FAA will consider all comments identify the docket number FAA–2002– States, with the exception of certain received on or before the closing date military, law enforcement, and 11580 at the beginning of your for comments. Late-filed comments will comments, and you should submit two emergency related aircraft operations. be considered to the extent practicable. This general prohibition was lifted in copies of your comments. If you wish to The final rule may be amended in light receive confirmation that the FAA part on September 13, 2001. In the of the comments received. Washington, DC Metropolitan area, received your comments, include a self- See ADDRESSES above for information addressed, stamped postcard. You may on how to submit comments. however, aircraft operations remained also submit comments through the prohibited at all civil airports within a Availability of This Action Internet to http://dms.dot.gov. 25-nautical mile radius of the You may review the public docket You can get an electronic copy using Washington (DCA) VOR/DME. This containing comments to these the Internet by taking the following action was accomplished through regulations in person in the Dockets steps: emergency air traffic rules issued Office between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00p.m., (1) Go to search function of the pursuant to title 14, Code of Federal Monday through Friday, except Federal Department of Transportation’s Regulations (14 CFR) 91.139 and the holidays. The Dockets Office is on the electronic Docket Management System implementation of temporary flight plaza level of the NASSIF Building at (DMS) Web page (http://dms.dot.gov/ restrictions (TFRs) issued pursuant to 14 the Department of Transportation at the search). CFR 91.137. (2) On the search page type in the last above address. You may also review five digits of the docket number shown On October 4, 2001, limited air carrier public dockets on the Internet at at the beginning of this document. Click operations were permitted to resume at http://dms.dot.gov. on ‘‘search.’’ Ronald Reagan Washington National FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: (3) On the next page, which contains Airport (DCA). On October 5, 2001, the Questions on this rulemaking: Bruce the docket summary information for the FAA issued NOTAM 1/0989, which Landry, ACP–200, Office of Civil Docket you selected, click on the final authorized instrument flight rules (IFR) Aviation Security Policy and Planning, rule. operations and limited visual flight Federal Aviation Administration, 800 You can also get an electronic copy rules (VFR) operations within an 18 to Independence Avenue, SW, using the Internet through FAA’s web 25 nautical mile radius from the DCA VerDate 11<MAY>2000 16:00 Feb 15, 2002 Jkt 197001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\19FER2.SGM pfrm02 PsN: 19FER2 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 33 / Tuesday, February 19, 2002 / Rules and Regulations 7539 VOR/DME in accordance with in this SFAR to operations to or from those conducted under 14 CFR part 91, emergency air traffic rules issued under these airports will help to protect those for which an air carrier or an 14 CFR 91.139. Exceptions to the critical national assets against an operating certificate may be issued restrictions affecting part 91 operations airborne threat while permitting the under 14 CFR part 119 (14 CFR parts in the Washington, DC area issued since resumption of operations at these 121, 125, and 135), and those which September 11th were made to permit airports. This action is taken in may be conducted under part 129, 133, the repositioning of aircraft from accordance with the Administrator’s or 137. airports within the area of the TFR and statutory mandate found in section The provisions of this rule do not to permit certain operations conducted 44701(a)(5) of Title 49, United States apply to the operation of ultralight under waivers issued by the FAA. Code (49 U.S.C.) to promote the safe vehicles, which must be conducted in On December 19, 2001, the FAA flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by accordance with 14 CFR part 103. Part canceled NOTAM 1/0989 and issued prescribing regulations and minimum 103 contains prohibitions on the NOTAM 1/3354 that set forth special standards necessary for safety in air operation of ultralight vehicles in security instructions under 14 CFR 99.7 commerce and national security. certain airspace, including both and created a new TFR under 14 CFR prohibited and restricted areas, and 91.137. That action significantly Justification for Emergency Final Rule other areas designated by NOTAM. decreased the size of the area subject to Because flight operations at airports Operators of ultralight vehicles should the earlier prohibitions on part 91 affected by this SFAR have been review current NOTAMs to determine operations in the Washington, DC area prohibited since September 11, 2001, the status of ultralight operations at and permitted operations at Freeway and in recognition of the need to restore these airports and within the special (W00), Maryland (2W5), and Suburban operations at these airports in a manner flight rules area. (W18) airports. At the same time, the that responds to the current security Although the FAA considered FAA eliminated all ‘‘enhanced Class B threat, the FAA is adopting this SFAR including operations to or from other airspace flight restrictions’’ Enhanced as an emergency final rule pursuant to airports within the Washington, DC Class B airspace consisted of that section 553 of the Administrative Metropolitan Area Special Flight Rules airspace underlying and overlying Class Procedures Act (APA).
Recommended publications
  • Plan to Celebrate the Holidays with GWBAA
    Facebook Twitter General Aviation Terminal, Hangar 7 Washington, DC 20001 (703) 417-3540 www.gwbaa.com [email protected] October 31, 2014 Plan to Celebrate the Holidays with GWBAA Holiday Party to be Held at Dulles Jet Center on Thursday, December 4 More details will be posted soon - but in the meantime, please mark your calendar to join us from 5:30pm-7:30pm on Thursday, December 4 at Dulles Jet Center (23800 Wind Sock Drive) for some holiday cheer. If you already know that you can join us, please RSVP to [email protected]. Also, the event would not be complete without our annual door prizes. We have a few things in our “GWBAA Closet” to give away, but if you or your company want to provide a door prize, please email us at [email protected]. Regional News Round-Up As part of General Aviation and Community Airport Month, Maryland Governor Martin O’Malley issued a proclamation honoring Maryland Airport in Charles County. Sue Greer, chairwoman of the Charles County Chamber of Commerce Economic Development Committee, noted that corporate air traffic is expected to increase in coming years and "Maryland Airport and Charles County are uniquely positioned to take advantage of that opportunity." The airport recently received a $1.6 million FAA grant. 1 The FBO at Culpeper Regional Airport will be under renovation starting on November 1, and will be operating out of temporary space in the Civil Air Patrol building until April 2015. Hours of operation will remain the same, but services/facilities may be limited.
    [Show full text]
  • COUNTY COUNCIL of PRINCE GEORGE's COUNTY, MARYLAND SITTING AS the DISTRICT COUNCIL 2002 Legislative Session Bill No
    COUNTY COUNCIL OF PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND SITTING AS THE DISTRICT COUNCIL 2002 Legislative Session Bill No. CB-51-2002 Chapter No. 46 Proposed and Presented by The Chairman (by request – Planning Board) Introduced by Council Members Shapiro, Hendershot, and Scott Co-Sponsors Date of Introduction May 21, 2002 ZONING BILL AN ORDINANCE concerning General Aviation Airports and Aviation Policy Areas For the purpose of defining and adopting land use regulations for Aviation Policy Areas, providing for designation of Aviation Policy Areas adjacent to public use, general aviation airports, establishing procedures for amendment of the Aviation Policy Area regulations for individual properties, and making related amendments to the Zoning Ordinance. BY repealing and reenacting with amendments: Sections 27-107.01(a), 27-229(b), and 27-333, The Zoning Ordinance of Prince George's County, Maryland, being also SUBTITLE 27. ZONING. The Prince George's County Code (1999 Edition, 2001 Supplement). BY adding: Sections 27-548.32, 27-548.33, 27-548.34, 27-548.35, 27-548.36, 27-548.37, 27-548.38, 27-548.39, 27-548.40, 27-548.41, 27-548.42, 27-548.43, 27-548.44, 27-548.45, 27-548.46, 27-548.47, 27-548.48, and 27-548.49, The Zoning Ordinance of Prince George's County, Maryland, being also CB-51-2002 (DR-2) – Summary Page 2 SUBTITLE 27. ZONING The Prince George's County Code (1999 Edition, 2001 Supplement). SECTION 1. BE IT ENACTED by the County Council of Prince George's County, Maryland, sitting as the District Council for that part of the Maryland-Washington Regional District in Prince George's County, Maryland, that the following findings are made: A.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 119 / Wednesday, June 19, 1996 / Rules and Regulations
    31018 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 119 / Wednesday, June 19, 1996 / Rules and Regulations TX. The development of a Global 71.1. The Class E airspace designation (lat. 27°54′04′′N., long. 98°03′06′′W.) Positioning System (GPS) standard listed in this document will be Navy Orange Grove TACAN ° ′ ′′ ° ′ ′′ instrument approach procedure (SIAP) published subsequently in the Order. (lat. 27 53 43 N., long. 98 02 33 W.) to Runway (RWY) 31 at Alice Kingsville, Kleberg County Airport, TX The Rule (lat. 27°33′03′′N., long. 98°01′51′′W.) International Airport has made this action necessary. This action is This amendment to part 71 of the That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface within a 7.5-mile intended to provide adequate Class E Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR radius of Alice International Airport and airspace to contain instrument flight part 71) revises the Class E airspace within 2 miles each side of the 135° bearing rule (IFR) operations for aircraft located at Alice, TX, to provide from Alice International Airport extending executing the GPS SIAP to RWY 31 at controlled airspace extending upward from the 7.5-mile radius to 9.8 miles Alice International Airport, Alice, TX. from 700 feet AGL for aircraft executing southeast of the airport and within a 7.2-mile EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 UTC, August 15, the GPS SIAP to RWY 31 at Alice radius of Orange Grove NALF and within 1.6 ° 1996. International Airport. miles each side of the 129 radial of the Navy The FAA has determined that this Orange Grove TACAN extending from the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 7.2-mile radius to 11.7 miles southeast of the Donald J.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Hudson River and East River Exclusion Special
    § 93.343 14 CFR Ch. I (1–1–11 Edition) VHF frequency 121.5 or UHF frequency Traffic Control-assigned course and re- 243.0. main clear of the DC FRZ. (d) Before departing from an airport (c) If using VFR egress procedures, a within the DC FRZ, or before entering pilot must— the DC FRZ, all aircraft, except DOD, (1) Depart as instructed by Air Traf- law enforcement, and lifeguard or air fic Control and expect a heading di- ambulance aircraft operating under an rectly out of the DC FRZ until the FAA/TSA airspace authorization must pilot establishes two-way radio com- file and activate an IFR or a DC FRZ munication with Potomac Approach; or a DC SFRA flight plan and transmit and a discrete transponder code assigned by (2) Operate as assigned by Air Traffic an Air Traffic Control facility. Aircraft Control until clear of the DC FRZ, the must transmit the discrete transponder DC SFRA, and the Class B or Class D code at all times while in the DC FRZ airspace area. or DC SFRA. (d) If using VFR ingress procedures, the aircraft must remain outside the § 93.343 Requirements for aircraft op- erations to or from College Park DC SFRA until the pilot establishes Airport, Potomac Airfield, or Wash- communications with Air Traffic Con- ington Executive/Hyde Field Air- trol and receives authorization for the port. aircraft to enter the DC SFRA. (a) A pilot may not operate an air- (e) VFR arrivals: craft to or from College Park Airport, (1) If landing at College Park Airport MD, Potomac Airfield, MD, or Wash- a pilot may receive routing via the vi- ington Executive/Hyde Field Airport, cinity of Freeway Airport; or MD unless— (2) If landing at Washington Execu- (1) The aircraft and its crew and pas- tive/Hyde Field or Potomac Airport, sengers comply with security rules the pilot may receive routing via the issued by the TSA in 49 CFR part 1562, vicinity of Maryland Airport or the subpart A; Nottingham VORTAC.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Tipton Airport in Anne Arundel County
    The Future of Tipton Airport in Anne Arundel County by Pranita Ranbhise Under the supervision of Professor Melina Duggal Course 788: Independent Study The University of Maryland- College Park Fall 2016 PALS - Partnership for Action Learning in Sustainability An initiative of the National Center for Smart Growth Gerrit Knaap, NCSG Executive Director Uri Avin, PALS Director, Kim Fisher, PALS Manager 1 Executive Summary Tipton Airport is located in Anne Arundel County, Maryland. It is a General (GA) airport, classified as a reliever airport by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). It is the reliever airport to the Baltimore/Washington International Thurgood Marshall Airport (BWI), which is located less than 13 miles from Tipton. The airport plans to extend their runway from 3,000 feet to 4,200 feet. The main objective for this expansion is to increase the number of larger turbo-planes and business aircrafts, which require longer runways that can use the facility. This will expand the airport’s market reach and user base, allowing it to improve the ease of flying for potential users. The purpose of this study is to determine the future demand for corporate service and other air traffic at the airport in light of the runway expansion, and to recommend additional variables that will help increase air traffic. The report provides a detailed description of Tipton Airport, including its location and context, airport services, and a comparison of these services with similar airports in Maryland. It also includes an analysis of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats for the airport, based on a review of FAA records and recommendations, market analysis, general aviation airport demand drivers, the Maryland Aviation Administration (MAA) reports, and information from airport experts.
    [Show full text]
  • FLIGHT ADVISORY NATIONAL SPECIAL SECURITY EVENT 2021 Presidential Inauguration Events
    FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION FLIGHT ADVISORY NATIONAL SPECIAL SECURITY EVENT 2021 Presidential Inauguration Events The planned 2021 Presidential Inauguration events in Washington, DC are scheduled for January 20, 2021 between the hours of 0800 to 2200 local time. At the request of the Department of Homeland Security and as part of the airspace security measures for the event, the FAA will be modifying the Washington Special Flight Rules Area (SFRA) and Washington Metropolitan Flight Restriction Zone (FRZ) with additional flight restrictions. Pursuant to 49 USC 40103(B), The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) classifies the airspace defined in these NOTAMs as "National Defense Airspace". Any person who knowingly or willfully violates the rules concerning operations in this airspace may be subject to certain criminal penalties under 49 USC 46307. Pilots who do not adhere to the following procedures may be intercepted, detained and interviewed by Law Enforcement/Security Personnel. Any of the following additional actions may also be taken against a pilot who does not comply with the requirements or any special instructions or procedures announced in this NOTAM: A. The FAA may take administrative action, including imposing civil penalties and the suspension or revocation of airmen certificates; or B. The United States government may pursue criminal charges, including charges under Title 49 of the United States Code, Section 46307; or C. The United States government may use deadly force against the airborne aircraft, if it is determined that the aircraft poses an imminent security threat. The following restrictions will apply: Washington DC SFRA Restrictions: The DC SFRA is that area of airspace over the surface of the earth where the ready identification, location, and control of aircraft is required in the interest of national security.
    [Show full text]
  • FAA) Will Be Issuing Temporary Flight Restrictions (TFR) in Support of the Nuclear Security Summit Taking Place in Washington, DC on March 31St and April 1St, 2016
    FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION FLIGHT ADVISORY National Special Security Event Nuclear Security Summit Washington, DC March 31 – April 1 The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) will be issuing Temporary Flight Restrictions (TFR) in support of the Nuclear Security Summit taking place in Washington, DC on March 31st and April 1st, 2016. The restrictions are designed to provide a safe and secure environment for the event but also ensure fair and equitable access to all airspace users to the greatest extent possible. At the request of the Department of Homeland Security and as part of the airspace security measures for the event, the FAA will be modifying the Washington Special Flight Rules Area (SFRA) and Washington Metropolitan Flight Restriction Zone (FRZ) with additional flight restrictions. Pursuant to 49 USC 40103(b), the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) classifies the airspace defined in this advisory and the published NOTAM as 'National Defense Airspace'. Pilots who do not adhere to the following procedures may be intercepted, detained and interviewed by law enforcement/security personnel. Any of the following additional actions may also be taken against a pilot who does not comply with the requirements or any special instructions or procedures announced in this NOTAM: a) The FAA may take administrative action, including imposing civil penalties and the suspension or revocation of airmen certificates; or b) The United States Government may pursue criminal charges, including charges under Title 49 of the United States Code, Section 46307; or c) The United States Government may use deadly force against the airborne aircraft, if it is determined that the aircraft poses an imminent security threat.
    [Show full text]
  • FLIGHT ADVISORY NATIONAL SPECIAL SECURITY EVENT 2011 Joint Session of Congress
    FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION FLIGHT ADVISORY NATIONAL SPECIAL SECURITY EVENT 2011 Joint Session of Congress Due to President Obama’s planned address to Joint Session of Congress in Washington, DC on September 8, 2011, the FAA at the request of the Department of Homeland Security and Department of Defense, as part of the airspace security measures will be modifying the Washington Special Flight Rules Area (SFRA) and Washington Metropolitan Flight Restriction Zone (FRZ) procedures. Pursuant to 49 USC 40103(B), The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) classifies the airspace defined in these NOTAMs as "National Defense Airspace". Any person who knowingly or willfully violates the rules concerning operations in this airspace may be subject to certain criminal penalties under 49 USC 46307. Pilots who do not adhere to the following procedures may be intercepted, detained and interviewed by Law Enforcement/Security Personnel. Any of the following additional actions may also be taken against a pilot who does not comply with the requirements or any special instructions or procedures announced in this NOTAM: A) The FAA may take administrative action, including imposing civil penalties and the suspension or revocation of airmen certificates; or B) The United States government may pursue criminal charges, including charges under Title 49 of the United States Code, Section 46307; or C) The United States government may use deadly force against the airborne aircraft, if it is determined that the aircraft poses an imminent security threat. The following restrictions will apply: Washington DC SFRA Restrictions: The DC SFRA is that area of airspace over the surface of the earth where the ready identification, location, and control of aircraft is required in the interests of national security.
    [Show full text]
  • Written Exam Testing Centers
    Computer Testing Designees Airman Knowledge Testing Center List This is an updated list of test center location and contact information. This list replaces all previous versions. Applicants may contact the following central registration numbers for additional information: Computer Assisted Testing Service (CATS) 1-800-947-4228 LaserGrade Computer Testing 1-800-211-2753 Airman Knowledge Testing Centers - 03/07/2008 State/City Site ID Site Address Country TCS Phone LE BOURGET CEDEX LASFR003 FLIGHT SAFETY SCHOOL AEROPORT DUDOURGET BP 25-BT 404 FRANCE MAUD DUBOSQ 33149921919 CAROLINA ABS00902 **C.V.Q. TECHNICAL TRAINING CENTER CARIBBEAN AIR FACILITIES BLDG/HGR PUERTO RICO NELSON T. FELICIANO (787) 253-3801 DUBAI, UNITED ARAB ABSAEDUB EMIRATES - CAE FLIGHT TRAINING EMIRATES AVIATION COLLEGE UNITED ARAB EMIRAT PRIYADARSHINI DIAS 971-4-2869119 FARNBOROUGH, HAMPS LASEN004 FLIGHTSAFETY INTERNATIONAL, UK LTD FARNBOROUGH AIRPORT UNITED KINGDOM CLARE BARKER 44-1-252-554-599 HULL, ONTARIO LASCA002 EAGLE SHADOW TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 400 BOUL ALEXANDRE TACHE, UNIT 380 CANADA DANIEL MARCOUX (819) 771-5054 MISSISSAUGA, ONTAR LASCA007 CANADIAN BUSINESS COLLEGE 77 CITY CENTRE DRIVE STE 105 CANADA JOSEPHINE D. CAMPBELL (905) 279-9929 OKINAWA ABSJ9011 KADENA AERO CLUB AMER. UNIV. EXTENSION, KADENA AIR JAPAN TERUMI MURDOCK 611-734-5758 OSAN ABSKROSA OSAN FLIGHT TRAINING CENTER (OSAN DEPT. OF THE AIR FORCE, OSAN SVS/L KOREA, REPUBLIC OF THOMAS MORTON 011 82 333 661 4424 SAN JUAN LAS00901 **ISLA GRANDE FLYING SCHOOL ISLA GRANDE AIRPORT PUERTO RICO CARLOS REYES (787) 722-1160 ST. THOMAS LAS00801 ACE FLIGHT CENTER, INC. P.O. BOX 306962, CYRIL E. KING AP VIRGIN ISLANDS TE`WANA I.
    [Show full text]
  • DCA Aviation Noise Assessment Comprehensive Report Sep2018
    RONALD REAGAN WASHINGTON NATIONAL AIRPORT (DCA) AIRPLANE NOISE ASSESSMENT FINAL REPORT Prepared for: The Government of the District of Columbia Department of Energy and Environment Prepared by: CSDA Design Group September 12, 2018 Randy Waldeck, PE 475 Sansome Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, CA 94111 Freytag & Associates Jack Freytag, PE Hughes AV Dennis Hughes DC Government Grant No. 2018-1810-AQD CSDA Project No. 1820.01 SEPTEMBER 2018 DCA Airplane Noise Assessment Final Report – September 2018 DC Government Grant No. 2018-1810-AQD Table of Contents Section Page 1.0 Project Description ............................................................................................................................ 6 2.0 Glossary of Terms .............................................................................................................................. 7 3.0 Historical Air Traffic Control Procedures ........................................................................................ 11 3.1 Background ......................................................................................................................... 11 3.2 Conventional ATC ................................................................................................................ 12 3.3 Area Navigation (RNAV) ...................................................................................................... 13 3.4 Performance-Based Navigation .......................................................................................... 13 3.5 NextGen
    [Show full text]
  • Advisory Circular
    U.S. Department Advisory of Transportation Federal Aviatlon Admlnlstration Circular Subject: FAA CERTIFICATED MAINTENANCE Date: 3 /6/g 7 AC No: 140-71 AGENCIES DIRECTORY Initiated by: AN-640 Change: 1. PURPOSE. This advisory circular (AC) transmits a consolidated directory of all certificated Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) repair stations and manufacturer’s maintenancefacilities. The repair stations and manufacturer’s maintenancefacilities were certificated as of January 2 1, 1997, under the authority of Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 145, and the directories are current as of January 21, 1997. 2. CANCELLATION. This AC cancelsAC 140-7H, FAA Certificated Maintenance Agencies Directory, dated July 24, 1995. 3. DESCRIPTION. Appendix 1 is a listing of repair stations and appendix 2 is a listing of manufacturer’s maintenancefacilities, their addresses,ratings, and codes. 4. RATING LEGENDS, CODES, AND EXPLANATIONS. a. FAA certificated repair station rating codesare describedin detail in part -l45, and are: (1) AF-Airframe l-composite construction, small aircraft 2-composite construction, large aircraft 3-all metal construction, small aircraft 4-all metal construction, large aircraft (2) PP-Powerplant l--reciprocating engines,400 hp or less 2-reciprocating engines,more than 400 hp 3-turbine engines (3) PRP-Propeller l--fixed pitch and ground adjustablepropellers - wood, metal, or composite 2-all other propellers, by make (4) RAD-Radio l-communication equipment 2-navigation equipment 3-radar equipment AC 140-71 316197 (5) INS-Instrument l-mechanical 2--electrical 3-gyroscopic 44-electronic (6) AAC-Accessory l-mechanical 2--electrical 3-electronic (7) L--Limited AAC --accessories AF --airframe EE -emergency equipment FAB -aircraft fabric FL0 -floats INS -instruments LG -landing gear NDT -nondestructive testing OT --other PP -powerplant PRP -propellers RAD -radio equipment RB --rotor blades SS ---specialized (8) Ratings may be limited to a specific model of aircraft, powerplant, propeller, radio, instrument, accessory,or parts thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary
    FINAL REPORT 2013 PREPARED FOR THE MARYLAND AVIATION ADMINISTRATION LANDRUM & BROWN, INCORPORATED | MARTIN ASSOCIATES Maryland Aviation Administration ECONOMIC IMPACT OF AIRPORTS Final Report 2013 Prepared by Landrum & Brown, Incorporated/Martin Associates The preparation of this document has been supported, in part, through the Airport Improvement Program financial assistance from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) thru AIP Grant 3-24-0000-002 (2012) as provided under Title 49 U.S.C., Section 47104. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the FAA. Acceptance of this report by the FAA does not in any way constitute a commitment on the part of the United States to participate in any development depicted therein nor does it indicate that the proposed development is environmentally acceptable or would have justification in accordance with appropriate public laws. MARYLAND AVIATION ADMINISTRATION ECONOMIC IMPACT OF AIRPORTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Maryland Aviation Administration conducted a study funded partially under a grant by the Federal Aviation Administration to estimate the economic impacts of the Maryland airport system. The first phase analyzed the Baltimore/Washington International Thurgood Marshall Airport (BWI) and Martin State Airport (MTN). Phase II estimates the economic impacts of the entire statewide aviation system, which consists of 35 general aviation (including MTN) and scheduled commercial service airports as well as BWI. The purpose of the study is to quantify the economic impacts generated by passenger and air cargo activity at BWI and to quantify the economic impacts generated by the 35 general aviation and scheduled commercial service airports. The impacts are quantified in terms of: Jobs Employee earnings Business revenue State and local taxes Federal airport-specific taxes The impacts are estimated for passenger and air cargo activity for calendar year 2011 for BWI and Martin State Airport and 2012 for the other 34 public use airports.
    [Show full text]