DOCSLIB.ORG

DCA Aviation Noise Assessment Comprehensive Report Sep2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DCA Aviation Noise Assessment Comprehensive Report Sep2018 RONALD REAGAN WASHINGTON NATIONAL AIRPORT (DCA) AIRPLANE NOISE ASSESSMENT FINAL REPORT Prepared for: The Government of the District of Columbia Department of Energy and Environment Prepared by: CSDA Design Group September 12, 2018 Randy Waldeck, PE 475 Sansome Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, CA 94111 Freytag & Associates Jack Freytag, PE Hughes AV Dennis Hughes DC Government Grant No. 2018-1810-AQD CSDA Project No. 1820.01 SEPTEMBER 2018 DCA Airplane Noise Assessment Final Report – September 2018 DC Government Grant No. 2018-1810-AQD Table of Contents Section Page 1.0 Project Description ............................................................................................................................ 6 2.0 Glossary of Terms .............................................................................................................................. 7 3.0 Historical Air Traffic Control Procedures ........................................................................................ 11 3.1 Background ......................................................................................................................... 11 3.2 Conventional ATC ................................................................................................................ 12 3.3 Area Navigation (RNAV) ...................................................................................................... 13 3.4 Performance-Based Navigation .......................................................................................... 13 3.5 NextGen .............................................................................................................................. 13 4.0 Flight Track History ......................................................................................................................... 15 4.1 Historical Summary ............................................................................................................. 15 4.2 The ATC Procedures ............................................................................................................ 15 4.3 Evolution of Impact on DC .................................................................................................. 21 4.4 The Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study ............................................................................. 21 4.5 Further ATC Routing Changes: LAZIR SID ............................................................................ 24 4.6 Washington DC Metroplex Study (OAPM) .......................................................................... 27 4.7 OAPM SIDs .......................................................................................................................... 28 4.8 RADAR Vectoring ................................................................................................................. 29 4.9 STARs ................................................................................................................................... 29 4.10 Instrument Approach Procedures (IAPs) ........................................................................ 29 4.11 Standard Instrument Departures (SIDs) .......................................................................... 29 4.12 TARGETS AEDT Environmental Plug-in Report ................................................................ 29 4.13 Flight Track Comparative Analysis .................................................................................. 30 4.14 RNAV Procedures ............................................................................................................ 32 4.15 P-56 Complex .................................................................................................................. 32 4.16 Operational Demands: DCA, IAD, BWI (Forecast) ........................................................... 33 4.17 Forecast Operations ........................................................................................................ 35 4.18 Arrivals ............................................................................................................................ 38 4.19 Summary and Conclusions .............................................................................................. 41 5.0 DCA Noise Monitoring System Analysis .......................................................................................... 42 5.1 Background ......................................................................................................................... 42 5.2 Regulatory Environment – FAA Order 1050.1E and 10501.F .............................................. 43 5.3 Noise Monitor Operations .................................................................................................. 45 5.4 Analyses Procedures ........................................................................................................... 46 5.5 Results and Conclusions ...................................................................................................... 46 5.6 Calculated Aircraft DNL with and without Community Events ........................................... 47 5.7 Temporal Analysis of NMT Events ...................................................................................... 48 5.8 Results and Conclusions ...................................................................................................... 50 6.0 DCA Noise Measurements and Noise Monitoring Terminals Analysis ........................................... 51 6.1 Summary ............................................................................................................................. 51 6.2 Measurement Description .................................................................................................. 51 6.3 Measurement Locations ..................................................................................................... 52 6.4 Measurement Procedure .................................................................................................... 53 6.5 Data Analysis Methodology ................................................................................................ 53 6.6 Calculation of SEL ................................................................................................................ 54 Page 1 of 150 DCA Airplane Noise Assessment Final Report – September 2018 DC Government Grant No. 2018-1810-AQD 6.7 Calculation of DNL ............................................................................................................... 54 6.8 Supplemental Metrics ......................................................................................................... 54 6.9 Calculation of TA and NA Levels.......................................................................................... 56 6.10 School Performance Analysis .......................................................................................... 56 6.11 Awakening Calculation Methodology ............................................................................. 58 6.12 Measurement Results and Conclusions .......................................................................... 59 6.13 Classroom Noise Analysis ................................................................................................ 72 6.14 Noise Monitoring Terminal Analysis ............................................................................... 75 7.0 Noise Complaint History ................................................................................................................. 81 7.1 Operation of the MWAA Complaint System for DCA.......................................................... 81 7.2 The MWAA Complaint System ............................................................................................ 84 7.3 Complaint Records .............................................................................................................. 84 7.4 Nature of Concerns ............................................................................................................. 84 7.5 Time of Complaints ............................................................................................................. 85 7.6 Complaints and Operations History .................................................................................... 86 7.7 Summary and Conclusions .................................................................................................. 88 8.0 Noise Modeling Analysis ................................................................................................................. 89 8.1 Summary ............................................................................................................................. 89 8.2 Modeling Procedure ........................................................................................................... 89 8.3 Data Output ........................................................................................................................ 90 8.4 Noise Modeling Results ....................................................................................................... 93 8.5 DNL Noise Exposure ............................................................................................................ 96 8.6 Comparison of Modeling results to MWAA Measurement Data ...................................... 107 8.7 TA Level ............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Plan to Celebrate the Holidays with GWBAA
    Facebook Twitter General Aviation Terminal, Hangar 7 Washington, DC 20001 (703) 417-3540 www.gwbaa.com [email protected] October 31, 2014 Plan to Celebrate the Holidays with GWBAA Holiday Party to be Held at Dulles Jet Center on Thursday, December 4 More details will be posted soon - but in the meantime, please mark your calendar to join us from 5:30pm-7:30pm on Thursday, December 4 at Dulles Jet Center (23800 Wind Sock Drive) for some holiday cheer. If you already know that you can join us, please RSVP to [email protected]. Also, the event would not be complete without our annual door prizes. We have a few things in our “GWBAA Closet” to give away, but if you or your company want to provide a door prize, please email us at [email protected]. Regional News Round-Up As part of General Aviation and Community Airport Month, Maryland Governor Martin O’Malley issued a proclamation honoring Maryland Airport in Charles County. Sue Greer, chairwoman of the Charles County Chamber of Commerce Economic Development Committee, noted that corporate air traffic is expected to increase in coming years and "Maryland Airport and Charles County are uniquely positioned to take advantage of that opportunity." The airport recently received a $1.6 million FAA grant. 1 The FBO at Culpeper Regional Airport will be under renovation starting on November 1, and will be operating out of temporary space in the Civil Air Patrol building until April 2015. Hours of operation will remain the same, but services/facilities may be limited.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study of Infrared Deployment Technologies to Enhance Quality Control on Asphalt Pavements Pave-IR Scantm
    Case Study of Infrared Deployment Technologies to Enhance Quality Control on Asphalt Pavements Pave-IR ScanTM October 2017 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No 3. Recipient’s Catalog No 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Case Study on Infrared Deployment October 2017 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Authors 8. Performing Organization Report No. Harold L. Von Quintus, P.E. and Joseph Reiter 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) C6B Applied Research Associates, Inc. 100 Trade Centre Drive, Suite 200 11. Contract or Grant No. Champaign, IL 61820 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Strategic Highway Research Program Draft Final Federal Highway Administration Office of Acquisition Management 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington DC 20590 15. Supplementary Notes Contracting Officers Technical Representative (COTR): Stephen Cooper 16. Abstract Infrared (IR) technology was recommended as part of the SHRP2 Technologies to Enhance Quality Control on Asphalt Pavements (R06C) product. As part of that recommendation, field projects were completed to demonstrate the use and effectiveness of an IR asphalt pavement scanner for control of asphalt mixture temperature uniformity, and to confirm the short and long-term benefits of the IR technology. A total of ten field demonstration projects and eight workshops were completed. The purpose of this report is to provide a summary of the field demonstration projects and workshops. 17. Key Words 18. Distribution Statement Infrared Technology, Infrared Scanner, Asphalt No restriction. This document is available to the public Pavement Construction, Quality Assurance, Quality through the National Technical Information Service Control 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield VA 22161 19.
    [Show full text]
  • COUNTY COUNCIL of PRINCE GEORGE's COUNTY, MARYLAND SITTING AS the DISTRICT COUNCIL 2002 Legislative Session Bill No
    COUNTY COUNCIL OF PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND SITTING AS THE DISTRICT COUNCIL 2002 Legislative Session Bill No. CB-51-2002 Chapter No. 46 Proposed and Presented by The Chairman (by request – Planning Board) Introduced by Council Members Shapiro, Hendershot, and Scott Co-Sponsors Date of Introduction May 21, 2002 ZONING BILL AN ORDINANCE concerning General Aviation Airports and Aviation Policy Areas For the purpose of defining and adopting land use regulations for Aviation Policy Areas, providing for designation of Aviation Policy Areas adjacent to public use, general aviation airports, establishing procedures for amendment of the Aviation Policy Area regulations for individual properties, and making related amendments to the Zoning Ordinance. BY repealing and reenacting with amendments: Sections 27-107.01(a), 27-229(b), and 27-333, The Zoning Ordinance of Prince George's County, Maryland, being also SUBTITLE 27. ZONING. The Prince George's County Code (1999 Edition, 2001 Supplement). BY adding: Sections 27-548.32, 27-548.33, 27-548.34, 27-548.35, 27-548.36, 27-548.37, 27-548.38, 27-548.39, 27-548.40, 27-548.41, 27-548.42, 27-548.43, 27-548.44, 27-548.45, 27-548.46, 27-548.47, 27-548.48, and 27-548.49, The Zoning Ordinance of Prince George's County, Maryland, being also CB-51-2002 (DR-2) – Summary Page 2 SUBTITLE 27. ZONING The Prince George's County Code (1999 Edition, 2001 Supplement). SECTION 1. BE IT ENACTED by the County Council of Prince George's County, Maryland, sitting as the District Council for that part of the Maryland-Washington Regional District in Prince George's County, Maryland, that the following findings are made: A.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Belvoir Real Property Master Plan MP20 Fort Belvoir 9820 Flagler Road NCPC MAP FILE NUMBER Fort Belvoir, VA 2204.10(05.00)44465
    Executive Director’s Recommendation Commission Meeting: January 5, 2017 PROJECT NCPC FILE NUMBER Fort Belvoir Real Property Master Plan MP20 Fort Belvoir 9820 Flagler Road NCPC MAP FILE NUMBER Fort Belvoir, VA 2204.10(05.00)44465 SUBMITTED BY APPLICANT’S REQUEST United States Department of Defense Approval of final master plan Department of the Army PROPOSED ACTION REVIEW AUTHORITY Approve with comments Federal Projects in the Environs per 40 U.S.C. § 8722(a) and (b)(1) ACTION ITEM TYPE Open Session Presentation PROJECT SUMMARY The Department of the Army has submitted the final 2015 Fort Belvoir Master Plan package, which consists of three separate documents: the Installation Vision and Development Plan (Master Plan); the Transportation Management Plan (TMP); and the Installation Planning Standards (IPS). As background, Fort Belvoir’s previous master plan was completed in 1993, with amendments in 2002 and 2007. An updated master plan is necessary to assist the installation with real property planning through 2030, based on projected employment growth of 17,000 personnel (from 39,000 in 2011 to 56,000 in 2030). The Master Plan Update includes 52 short-term (through 2017) building demolition, construction, and renovation projects, and four transportation improvement projects. The Plan includes 10 long-term building and 10 transportation projects, scheduled for completion between 2018 and 2030. The long-term projects are less defined in terms of siting, design, and timing. NCPC will need additional analysis as each project reaches a more advanced stage of planning. Fort Belvoir (Main Post and Fort Belvoir North Area (FBNA)) is located along the Potomac River in Fairfax County, Virginia, situated 16 miles southwest of Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 119 / Wednesday, June 19, 1996 / Rules and Regulations
    31018 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 119 / Wednesday, June 19, 1996 / Rules and Regulations TX. The development of a Global 71.1. The Class E airspace designation (lat. 27°54′04′′N., long. 98°03′06′′W.) Positioning System (GPS) standard listed in this document will be Navy Orange Grove TACAN ° ′ ′′ ° ′ ′′ instrument approach procedure (SIAP) published subsequently in the Order. (lat. 27 53 43 N., long. 98 02 33 W.) to Runway (RWY) 31 at Alice Kingsville, Kleberg County Airport, TX The Rule (lat. 27°33′03′′N., long. 98°01′51′′W.) International Airport has made this action necessary. This action is This amendment to part 71 of the That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface within a 7.5-mile intended to provide adequate Class E Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR radius of Alice International Airport and airspace to contain instrument flight part 71) revises the Class E airspace within 2 miles each side of the 135° bearing rule (IFR) operations for aircraft located at Alice, TX, to provide from Alice International Airport extending executing the GPS SIAP to RWY 31 at controlled airspace extending upward from the 7.5-mile radius to 9.8 miles Alice International Airport, Alice, TX. from 700 feet AGL for aircraft executing southeast of the airport and within a 7.2-mile EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 UTC, August 15, the GPS SIAP to RWY 31 at Alice radius of Orange Grove NALF and within 1.6 ° 1996. International Airport. miles each side of the 129 radial of the Navy The FAA has determined that this Orange Grove TACAN extending from the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 7.2-mile radius to 11.7 miles southeast of the Donald J.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Hudson River and East River Exclusion Special
    § 93.343 14 CFR Ch. I (1–1–11 Edition) VHF frequency 121.5 or UHF frequency Traffic Control-assigned course and re- 243.0. main clear of the DC FRZ. (d) Before departing from an airport (c) If using VFR egress procedures, a within the DC FRZ, or before entering pilot must— the DC FRZ, all aircraft, except DOD, (1) Depart as instructed by Air Traf- law enforcement, and lifeguard or air fic Control and expect a heading di- ambulance aircraft operating under an rectly out of the DC FRZ until the FAA/TSA airspace authorization must pilot establishes two-way radio com- file and activate an IFR or a DC FRZ munication with Potomac Approach; or a DC SFRA flight plan and transmit and a discrete transponder code assigned by (2) Operate as assigned by Air Traffic an Air Traffic Control facility. Aircraft Control until clear of the DC FRZ, the must transmit the discrete transponder DC SFRA, and the Class B or Class D code at all times while in the DC FRZ airspace area. or DC SFRA. (d) If using VFR ingress procedures, the aircraft must remain outside the § 93.343 Requirements for aircraft op- erations to or from College Park DC SFRA until the pilot establishes Airport, Potomac Airfield, or Wash- communications with Air Traffic Con- ington Executive/Hyde Field Air- trol and receives authorization for the port. aircraft to enter the DC SFRA. (a) A pilot may not operate an air- (e) VFR arrivals: craft to or from College Park Airport, (1) If landing at College Park Airport MD, Potomac Airfield, MD, or Wash- a pilot may receive routing via the vi- ington Executive/Hyde Field Airport, cinity of Freeway Airport; or MD unless— (2) If landing at Washington Execu- (1) The aircraft and its crew and pas- tive/Hyde Field or Potomac Airport, sengers comply with security rules the pilot may receive routing via the issued by the TSA in 49 CFR part 1562, vicinity of Maryland Airport or the subpart A; Nottingham VORTAC.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Tipton Airport in Anne Arundel County
    The Future of Tipton Airport in Anne Arundel County by Pranita Ranbhise Under the supervision of Professor Melina Duggal Course 788: Independent Study The University of Maryland- College Park Fall 2016 PALS - Partnership for Action Learning in Sustainability An initiative of the National Center for Smart Growth Gerrit Knaap, NCSG Executive Director Uri Avin, PALS Director, Kim Fisher, PALS Manager 1 Executive Summary Tipton Airport is located in Anne Arundel County, Maryland. It is a General (GA) airport, classified as a reliever airport by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). It is the reliever airport to the Baltimore/Washington International Thurgood Marshall Airport (BWI), which is located less than 13 miles from Tipton. The airport plans to extend their runway from 3,000 feet to 4,200 feet. The main objective for this expansion is to increase the number of larger turbo-planes and business aircrafts, which require longer runways that can use the facility. This will expand the airport’s market reach and user base, allowing it to improve the ease of flying for potential users. The purpose of this study is to determine the future demand for corporate service and other air traffic at the airport in light of the runway expansion, and to recommend additional variables that will help increase air traffic. The report provides a detailed description of Tipton Airport, including its location and context, airport services, and a comparison of these services with similar airports in Maryland. It also includes an analysis of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats for the airport, based on a review of FAA records and recommendations, market analysis, general aviation airport demand drivers, the Maryland Aviation Administration (MAA) reports, and information from airport experts.
    [Show full text]
  • FLIGHT ADVISORY NATIONAL SPECIAL SECURITY EVENT 2021 Presidential Inauguration Events
    FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION FLIGHT ADVISORY NATIONAL SPECIAL SECURITY EVENT 2021 Presidential Inauguration Events The planned 2021 Presidential Inauguration events in Washington, DC are scheduled for January 20, 2021 between the hours of 0800 to 2200 local time. At the request of the Department of Homeland Security and as part of the airspace security measures for the event, the FAA will be modifying the Washington Special Flight Rules Area (SFRA) and Washington Metropolitan Flight Restriction Zone (FRZ) with additional flight restrictions. Pursuant to 49 USC 40103(B), The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) classifies the airspace defined in these NOTAMs as "National Defense Airspace". Any person who knowingly or willfully violates the rules concerning operations in this airspace may be subject to certain criminal penalties under 49 USC 46307. Pilots who do not adhere to the following procedures may be intercepted, detained and interviewed by Law Enforcement/Security Personnel. Any of the following additional actions may also be taken against a pilot who does not comply with the requirements or any special instructions or procedures announced in this NOTAM: A. The FAA may take administrative action, including imposing civil penalties and the suspension or revocation of airmen certificates; or B. The United States government may pursue criminal charges, including charges under Title 49 of the United States Code, Section 46307; or C. The United States government may use deadly force against the airborne aircraft, if it is determined that the aircraft poses an imminent security threat. The following restrictions will apply: Washington DC SFRA Restrictions: The DC SFRA is that area of airspace over the surface of the earth where the ready identification, location, and control of aircraft is required in the interest of national security.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Weather Services
    Fire Weather Services for Virginia Operating Plan NWS Blacksburg, VA NWS Charleston, WV NWS Morristown, TN NWS Sterling, VA NWS Wakefield, VA 2021 This operating plan will be a semi-permanent document, specifying Fire Weather services provided by National Weather Service in Virginia. The plan incorporates procedures detailed in the Interagency Agreement for Meteorological Services. Table of Contents Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 4 Purpose of the AOP. ................................................................................................... 4 Explanation of relationship between the AOP and MOU. .......................................... 4 Service Area and Organizational Directory ........................................................................ 5 NWS Service Area and Organizational Information .................................................. 5 National Weather Service Headquarters ..................................................................... 8 National Weather Service Regional Headquarters ..................................................... 8 Weather Forecast Offices (WFO) ............................................................................... 8 Meteorologists-in-Charge (MIC) ................................................................................ 9 Program Leaders (or Focal Points) ........................................................................... 10 Participating Agencies .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • FAA) Will Be Issuing Temporary Flight Restrictions (TFR) in Support of the Nuclear Security Summit Taking Place in Washington, DC on March 31St and April 1St, 2016
    FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION FLIGHT ADVISORY National Special Security Event Nuclear Security Summit Washington, DC March 31 – April 1 The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) will be issuing Temporary Flight Restrictions (TFR) in support of the Nuclear Security Summit taking place in Washington, DC on March 31st and April 1st, 2016. The restrictions are designed to provide a safe and secure environment for the event but also ensure fair and equitable access to all airspace users to the greatest extent possible. At the request of the Department of Homeland Security and as part of the airspace security measures for the event, the FAA will be modifying the Washington Special Flight Rules Area (SFRA) and Washington Metropolitan Flight Restriction Zone (FRZ) with additional flight restrictions. Pursuant to 49 USC 40103(b), the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) classifies the airspace defined in this advisory and the published NOTAM as 'National Defense Airspace'. Pilots who do not adhere to the following procedures may be intercepted, detained and interviewed by law enforcement/security personnel. Any of the following additional actions may also be taken against a pilot who does not comply with the requirements or any special instructions or procedures announced in this NOTAM: a) The FAA may take administrative action, including imposing civil penalties and the suspension or revocation of airmen certificates; or b) The United States Government may pursue criminal charges, including charges under Title 49 of the United States Code, Section 46307; or c) The United States Government may use deadly force against the airborne aircraft, if it is determined that the aircraft poses an imminent security threat.
    [Show full text]
  • Gao-21-200, Aircraft Noise
    United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters January 2021 AIRCRAFT NOISE Better Information Sharing Could Improve Responses to Washington, D.C. Area Helicopter Noise Concerns GAO-21-200 January 2021 AIRCRAFT NOISE Better Information Sharing Could Improve Responses to Washington, D.C. Area Helicopter Noise Concerns Highlights of GAO-21-200, a report to congressional requesters Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found Helicopter noise can potentially expose According to Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) data for 2017 through 2019, members of the public to a variety of over 50 helicopter operators conducted approximately 88,000 helicopter flights negative effects, ranging from within 30 miles of Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport (D.C. area), annoyance to more serious medical though limited data on noise from these flights exist. According to operators, issues. FAA is responsible for these flights supported various missions (see table below). While the number of managing navigable U.S. airspace and flights has decreased slightly over the 3 years reviewed, it is unknown whether regulating noise from civil helicopter there has been a change in helicopter noise in the area. For example, most operations. Residents of the D.C. area stakeholders do not collect noise data, and existing studies of helicopter noise in have raised concerns about the the area are limited. D.C. area airspace constraints—such as lower maximum number of helicopter flights and the altitudes near urban areas—combined with proximity to frequently traveled resulting noise. helicopter routes and operational factors may affect the noise heard by residents. GAO was asked to review issues related to helicopter flights and noise Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)-Reported Helicopter Flights Conducted in the within the D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • SCANNING the 59Th PRESIDENTIAL INAUGURATION
    Volume 24 Issue 1 (2021) January 2021 SCANNING THE 59th The U.S. Capitol Police operates on PRESIDENTIAL INAUGURATION this digital P25 trunked network. This is fully encrypted, but we list it be- By Chief Larry Van Horn, Chris Parris, Ron Perron, cause of the U.S. Capitol grounds’ sig- David Schoenberger, and edited by Alan Henney with nificance to the overall event. contributions from Anonymous and others as noted. USCPD also has an in-town conven- America’s 46th President, Joe Biden — codenamed tional repeater that can patch outside users into the “Celtic” by the Secret Service — will take the Oath of Of- trunked system. It is known as “Red 1” and operates on fice on Wednesday, January 20, 2021. The nation’s 169.725/165.225 with NAC $1A3. Its talkaround, 59th Inaugural activities will include Pass in Review, 169.725, is the “T/A LOS1” (talkaround, line-of-sight) Presidential Escort, and a Virtual Parade Across Amer- channel. These too are entirely encrypted. ica as explained in the Presidential Inaugural Committee (PIC) website. In addition, these repeater pairs are allocated to USCPD for use nationwide: 163.1/168.35 [Blue], 166.45/173.525 This is the 9th CHM inaugural scanning guide and our [Green] and 166.475/173.875 [Black]. These USCPD most detailed ever, thanks to many contributors. Please simplex channels are for use nationwide: 168.35 continue to share your discoveries on the Scan-DC [Alpha], 173.525 [Bravo] and 173.875 [Charlie]. NACs email list or on the CHM Facebook page. reported in use include $293, $1A3, $1B3, $1C3 and $1D3.
    [Show full text]