The Physics of Sqiling Bryond

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Physics of Sqiling Bryond The physics of sqiling BryonD. Anderson Sqilsond keels,like oirplone wings, exploit Bernoulli's principle. Aerodynomicond hydrodynomicinsighis help designeri creqte fosterioilboots. BryonAnderson is on experimentolnucleor physicist ond,choirmon of the physicsdeportment ot KentSlote University in Kent,Ohio. He is olsoon ovocotionolsoilor who lecfuresond wrifesobout the intersectionbehyeen physics ond soiling. In addition to the recreational pleasure sailing af- side and lower on the downwind side. fords, it involves some interesting physics.Sailing starts with For downwind sailing, with the sail oriented perpen- the force of the wind on the sails.Analyzing that interaction dicular to the wind directiory the pressure increase on the up- yields some results not commonly known to non-sailors. It wind side is greater than the pressure decrease on the down- turns ou! for example, that downwind is not the fastestdi- wind side. As one turns the boat more and more into the rection for sailing. And there are aerodynamic issues.Sails direction from which the wind is coming, those differences and keels work by providing "lift" from the fluid passing reverse, so that with the wind perpendicular to the motion of around them. So optimizing keel and wing shapesinvolves the boat, the pressure decrease on the downwind side is wing theory. greater than the pressure increase on the upwind side. For a The resistance experienced by a moving sailboat in- boat sailing almost directly into the wind, the pressure de- cludes the effects of waves, eddiei, and turb-ulencein the crease on the downwind side is much greater than the in- water, and of the vortices produced in air by the sails.To re- crease on the upwind side. duce resistanceeffectively by optimizing hulls, keels, and Experimenting with what can be done, a beginner finds sails, one has to understand its various components. some surprising results. Sailors know well that the fastest point of sail (the boat's direction of motion with respect to the Wind power wind direction) is not directly downwind. Sailboats move Moving air has kinetic energy that cary through its interac- fastest when the boat is moving with the wind coming tion with the sails,be used to propel a sailboat.Like airplane "abeam" (from the side). That's easily understood: When a wings, sails exploit Bernoulli's principle. An airplane wing is sailboat is moving directly downwind, it can never move designed to causethe air moving over its top to move faster faster than the wind because, at the wind speed, the sails than the air moving along its undersurface.That results in would feel no wind. In fact, a boat going downwind can lower pressure above the wing than below it. The pressure never attain the wind speed because there's always some re- difference generatesthe lift provided by the wing. sistance to its motion through the water. There is much discussionof whether the pressurediffer- But when the boat is moving perpendicular to the wind, encearises entirely from the Bemoulli effector partly from the the boat's speed doesn't decrease the force of the wind on the wing's impact and redirection of the air. Classicwing theory sails. One sets the sails at about 45o to the direction of mo- attributesall the lift to the Bemoulli effectand ascribesthe dif- tion-and to the wind. The boat's equilibrium speed is de- ferencein wind speedsabove and below the wing to the wing's termined by the roughly constant force of the wind in the asymmetric cross-sectionalshape, which causedthe path on sails and the resistance against the boat's motion through the top to be longer. But it's well known that an updown sym-, water. If the resistance can be made small, the velocity can be metrical wing can provide lift simply by moving through the large. That's seen most dramatically for sail iceboats, which air with an upward tilf called the angle of attack. Thery de- skate on the ice with very little resistance. They can glide spite the wing's symmetry,the wind still experiencesa longer along at speeds in excess of 150 kmlh with the wind abeam path and thus greater speed over the top of the wing than at speeds of only 50 km/h! Of course sailboats plowing under its bottom. A NASA websitehas an excellentdiscussion through the water experience much more resistance. of the various contributions to lift by an airplane wing.l It dis- Nonetheless, some specially constructed sailboats have at- putes the conventionalsimple version of wing theory and em- tained speeds of more than twice the wind speed. phasizes that lift is produced by the tuming of the fluid flow. The caseis similar for sailboats.A sail is almost always Keels curved and presentedto the wind at an angle of attack. It was recognized centuries ago that a sailboat needs The situation is shown schematicallyin figure 1a. The something to help it move in the direction in which it's wind moving around the "upper," or downwind, side of pointed rather than just drifting downwind. The answer was the sail is forced to take the longer path. So the presenceof the keel. Until the development of modem wing theory it the surrounding moving air makes it move faster than was thought that one needed a long, deep keel to prevent the air passing along the "lower," or upwind, side of the side-slipping. But now it's understood that a keel, like a sail, sail. Measurementsconfirm that relative to the air pressure works by providing sideways lift as the water flows around far from the sail, the pressure is higher on the upwind it, as shown in figure 1a. A keel must be symmetrical for 38 February2008 PhysicsToday @ 2008 American Instituteof Physics,5-0031-9228-0802-020-6 "# Fsail F.1.ngF.,t.ng Figurel. Forceson o movingsoilboqt. (q) Soilond keelproduce horizontol "|ift" forcesdue to pressuredifferences from differentwind'ond woter speeos, respectively,on oppositesurfoces. (b) The vector sum of lift forcesfrom soil ond keelforces determines the boot'sdirection of motion(ossuming there's no rudder).When boot speedond courseore constont,the net lift forceis pre- ciselybolonced by thevelocity-dependent drog forceon the boot os it plows throughwoter ond oir. the sailboat to move to either side of the wind. with respect to the hull and the bulk of water farther away. A keel works only if the motion of the boat is not exactly The shear means that van der Waals couplings between water in the direction in which it's pointed. The boat must be mov- molecules are being broken. That costs energy and createsthe ing somewhat sideways. In that "crabbing" motion, the keel resistive force, which becomes stronger as the boat's speed moves through the water with an angle of attack. Just as for increases.The energy dissipation also increaseswith the total the sails in the wind, that causes the water on the "high" area of wetted surface. (more downstream) side of the keel to move faster and cre- Although the effect is called frictiorral resistance,it's im- ate a lower pressure. Again, the net lift force on the keel is portant to realize that the resistive force in water is basically due to the combination of that decreasedpressure on the high different from the frictional force between solid surfaces side and increased pressure on the other (low) side. rubbed together. To reduce ordinary friction, one can polish In figure 1b, the keel lift thus generated points almost in or lubricate the sliding surfaces. That makes surface bumps the opposite direction from the lift provided by the sails. The smaller, and it substitutes the shearing of fluid lubricant mol- two vectors can be resolved into components along and per- ecules for shearing of the more tightly bound molecules on pendicular to the boat's direction of motion. For a saiiboat the solid surfaces. moving in equilibrium-that is, at constant speed in a fixed For a boat moving through water, however, polishing the direction-the transverse lift components from sail and keel hull doesn't eliminate the shearing of the molecules of water, cancel each other. The componeni of the driving force from which is already a fluid. The resistive force cannot be reduced the sails in the direction of motion is the force that is actually significantly except by reducing the wetted surface. It does moving the boat forward. For equilibrium motion, that force help to have a smooth surface, but that's primarily to reduce is balanced by the opposing component of the keel lift plus turbulence. the total resistive force. The generation of turbulence is a general phenomenon Wing theory, developed over the past 100years for flight, in the flow of fluids. At sufficiently low speeds, fluid flow is indicates that the most efficient wing is long and narrow. Vor- laminar. At higher speeds, turbulence begins. Its onset has to tices produced at the wing tip cost energy. A long, narrow do with the shearing of the molecules in the fluid. When the wing maximizes the ratio of lift to vortex dissipation, thus shearing reaches a critical rate, the fluid can no longer re- providing the best performance for a given wing surface area. spond with a continuous dynamic equilibrium in the flow That also applies to sailboat sails and keels. and the result is turbulence. Its onset is ouantifiecl in terms It is now recognized that the most efficient keels are nar- of the Reynolds nrrmber row from front to back and deep. Such a keel can have much R: (Lu)l(p.lp), (1) less surface area than the old long keels.
Recommended publications
  • Experimental Analysis of a Low Cost Lift and Drag Force Measurement System for Educational Sessions
    International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056 Volume: 04 Issue: 09 | Sep -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072 Experimental Analysis of a Low Cost Lift and Drag Force Measurement System for Educational Sessions Asutosh Boro B.Tech National Institute of Technology Srinagar Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012 ---------------------------------------------------------------------***--------------------------------------------------------------------- Abstract - A low cost Lift and Drag force measurement wind- tunnel and used for educational learning with good system was designed, fabricated and tested in wind tunnel accuracy. In addition, an indirect wind tunnel velocity to be used for basic practical lab sessions. It consists of a measurement capability of the designed system was mechanical linkage system, piezo-resistive sensors and tested. NACA airfoil 4209 was chosen as the test subject to NACA Airfoil to test its performance. The system was tested measure its performance and tests were done at various at various velocities and angle of attacks and experimental angles of attack and velocities 11m/s, 12m/s and 14m/s. coefficient of lift and drag were then compared with The force and coefficient results obtained were compared literature values to find the errors. A decent accuracy was with literature data from airfoil tools[1] to find the deduced from the lift data and the considerable error in system’s accuracy. drag was due to concentration of drag forces across a narrow force range and sensor’s fluctuations across that 1.1 Methodology range. It was inferred that drag system will be as accurate as the lift system when the drag forces are large.
    [Show full text]
  • The Neighbourhood Messenger
    THE NEIGHBOURHOOD MESSENGER NEWSLETTER OF THE ADOLPHUSTOWN-FREDERICKSBURGH HERITAGE SOCIETY Issue Number 8 February 2014 A Wintry World The winter solstice seemed to arrive this year with a frightening arsenal of severe winter weather. Spanning the full range of deep freezing temperatures and attendant fluffy snow, to rain, freezing rain and ice pellets, the weather served up conditions that ran from Our Society simply unpleasant to outright destructive. The falling of ice- Members of the Adolphustown- laden trees that downed power lines meant many of us were Fredericksburgh Heritage Society are without electricity in the days just before Christmas. This was a your neighbours, your friends, your family. near calamity for some, but it no doubt brought to mind how We are new to the area or have lived the people of this region endured the winters not so long ago. here all our lives. Some of us are Certainly there was hardship, and indeed tragedy, in the early descendants of the Loyalists who settled years of settlement along these shores and throughout the two the shores of the Bay of Quinte. We all share a desire to deepen our knowledge centuries that followed. However, winters of our past were not of the history of our local community and only to be survived. They also presented an opportunity to to share our passion with others. play: from sleigh or cutter rides along the roads or bays, to skating, tobogganing, ice fishing and iceboating. In this issue Our Executive of the Neighbourhood Messenger we will look at the many President: Angela Cronk ways winter has impacted life of the residents of our townships.
    [Show full text]
  • Sailing for Performance
    SD2706 Sailing for Performance Objective: Learn to calculate the performance of sailing boats Today: Sailplan aerodynamics Recap User input: Rig dimensions ‣ P,E,J,I,LPG,BAD Hull offset file Lines Processing Program, LPP: ‣ Example.bri LPP_for_VPP.m rigdata Hydrostatic calculations Loading condition ‣ GZdata,V,LOA,BMAX,KG,LCB, hulldata ‣ WK,LCG LCF,AWP,BWL,TC,CM,D,CP,LW, T,LCBfpp,LCFfpp Keel geometry ‣ TK,C Solve equilibrium State variables: Environmental variables: solve_Netwon.m iterative ‣ VS,HEEL ‣ TWS,TWA ‣ 2-dim Netwon-Raphson iterative method Hydrodynamics Aerodynamics calc_hydro.m calc_aero.m VS,HEEL dF,dM Canoe body viscous drag Lift ‣ RFC ‣ CL Residuals Viscous drag Residuary drag calc_residuals_Newton.m ‣ RR + dRRH ‣ CD ‣ dF = FAX + FHX (FORCE) Keel fin drag ‣ dM = MH + MR (MOMENT) Induced drag ‣ RF ‣ CDi Centre of effort Centre of effort ‣ CEH ‣ CEA FH,CEH FA,CEA The rig As we see it Sail plan ≈ Mainsail + Jib (or genoa) + Spinnaker The sail plan is defined by: IMSYC-66 P Mainsail hoist [m] P E Boom leech length [m] BAD Boom above deck [m] I I Height of fore triangle [m] J Base of fore triangle [m] LPG Perpendicular of jib [m] CEA CEA Centre of effort [m] R Reef factor [-] J E LPG BAD D Sailplan modelling What is the purpose of the sails on our yacht? To maximize boat speed on a given course in a given wind strength ‣ Max driving force, within our available righting moment Since: We seek: Fx (Thrust vs Resistance) ‣ Driving force, FAx Fy (Side forces, Sails vs. Keel) ‣ Heeling force, FAy (Mx (Heeling-righting moment)) ‣ Heeling arm, CAE Aerodynamics of sails A sail is: ‣ a foil with very small thickness and large camber, ‣ with flexible geometry, ‣ usually operating together with another sail ‣ and operating at a large variety of angles of attack ‣ Environment L D V Each vertical section is a differently cambered thin foil Aerodynamics of sails TWIST due to e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Equinox Manual
    Racing Manual V1.2 January 2014 Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 3 The Boat ........................................................................................................................................ 3 Positions on a Sigma 38 ................................................................................................................. 4 Points of Sail .................................................................................................................................. 5 Tacking a boat ............................................................................................................................... 6 Gybing a boat ................................................................................................................................ 7 Essential knots all sailors should know ............................................................................................... 8 Bowline ......................................................................................................................................... 8 Cleat Knot ..................................................................................................................................... 8 Clove Hitch ................................................................................................................................... 8 Reef Knot......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • How Do Wings Generate Lift? 2
    GENERAL ARTICLE How Do Wings Generate Lift? 2. Myths, Approximate Theories and Why They All Work M D Deshpande and M Sivapragasam A cambered surface that is moving forward in a fluid gen- erates lift. To explain this interesting fact in terms of sim- pler models, some preparatory concepts were discussed in the first part of this article. We also agreed on what is an accept- able explanation. Then some popular models were discussed. Some quantitative theories will be discussed in this conclud- ing part. Finally we will tie up all these ideas together and connect them to the rigorous momentum theorem. M D Deshpande is a Professor in the Faculty of Engineering The triumphant vindication of bold theories – are these not the and Technology at M S Ramaiah University of pride and justification of our life’s work? Applied Sciences. Sherlock Holmes, The Valley of Fear Sir Arthur Conan Doyle 1. Introduction M Sivapragasam is an We start here with two quantitative theories before going to the Assistant Professor in the momentum conservation principle in the next section. Faculty of Engineering and Technology at M S Ramaiah University of Applied 1.1 The Thin Airfoil Theory Sciences. This elegant approximate theory takes us further than what was discussed in the last two sections of Part 111, and quantifies the Resonance, Vol.22, No.1, ideas to get expressions for lift and moment that are remarkably pp.61–77, 2017. accurate. The pressure distribution on the airfoil, apart from cre- ating a lift force, leads to a nose-up or nose-down moment also.
    [Show full text]
  • A Concept of the Vortex Lift of Sharp-Edge Delta Wings Based on a Leading-Edge-Suction Analogy Tech Library Kafb, Nm
    I A CONCEPT OF THE VORTEX LIFT OF SHARP-EDGE DELTA WINGS BASED ON A LEADING-EDGE-SUCTION ANALOGY TECH LIBRARY KAFB, NM OL3042b NASA TN D-3767 A CONCEPT OF THE VORTEX LIFT OF SHARP-EDGE DELTA WINGS BASED ON A LEADING-EDGE-SUCTION ANALOGY By Edward C. Polhamus Langley Research Center Langley Station, Hampton, Va. NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION For sale by the Clearinghouse for Federal Scientific and Technical Information Springfield, Virginia 22151 - Price $1.00 A CONCEPT OF THE VORTEX LIFT OF SHARP-EDGE DELTA WINGS BASED ON A LEADING-EDGE-SUCTION ANALOGY By Edward C. Polhamus Langley Research Center SUMMARY A concept for the calculation of the vortex lift of sharp-edge delta wings is pre­ sented and compared with experimental data. The concept is based on an analogy between the vortex lift and the leading-edge suction associated with the potential flow about the leading edge. This concept, when combined with potential-flow theory modified to include the nonlinearities associated with the exact boundary condition and the loss of the lift component of the leading-edge suction, provides excellent prediction of the total lift for a wide range of delta wings up to angles of attack of 20° or greater. INTRODUCTION The aerodynamic characteristics of thin sharp-edge delta wings are of interest for supersonic aircraft and have been the subject of theoretical and experimental studies for many years in both the subsonic and supersonic speed ranges. Of particular interest at subsonic speeds has been the formation and influence of the leading-edge separation vor­ tex that occurs on wings having sharp, highly swept leading edges.
    [Show full text]
  • Sailing Instructions
    Verve Inshore Regatta Chicago Yacht Club Belmont Harbor, Chicago, IL August 24-26, 2018 SAILING INSTRUCTIONS Abbreviations [SP] Rules for which a standard penalty may be applied by the race committee without a hearing or a ​ discretionary penalty applied by the protest committee with a hearing. [DP] Rules for which the penalties are at the discretion of the protest committee. ​ [NP] Rules that are not grounds for a protest or request for redress by a boat. This changes RRS ​ 60.1(a) 1 RULES 1.1 The regatta will be governed by the rules as defined in The Racing Rules of Sailing. ​ ​ 1.2 Appendices T and V1 shall apply. 1.3 Class rules prohibiting the use of marine band radios and cellular telephones will not apply. All keelboats are required to carry an operating VHF marine-band radio while sailing in these events. This changes International Etchells class rule C.5.2(b)(8). 1.4 Class rules prohibiting GPS navigation devices will not apply. The following conditions will apply to the use of GPS navigation devices: When class rules prohibit the use of a GPS while racing, such a device may be used provided that it will be installed in a position or covered in such a way that no data may be taken from it while sailing. Data produced by such device may be viewed only at the dock or on shore. This changes International Etchells class rule C.5.1(b) and Shields class rule 10.9. 1.5 For the J/70 class only, J/70 Class Rules Part III I.3 (Support Boats) will apply.
    [Show full text]
  • Setting up Your FD to Go Sailing
    FD Trim Setting up your FD to go sailing The FD is a complex and powerful dinghy and getting the boat set up correctly for the prevailing conditions makes all the difference between the boat flying along and its being a pig to sail, especially to windward. It is important, therefore, that the significant controls are readily adjustable by the helmsman whilst sailing, so that he can fine tune the rig without loosing way or control. Of course, all the usual boat turning and preparation rules apply to the FD as to any other performance dinghy. Get the centreboard and rudder vertical and in line; get the mast central and upright in the boat; make the mast a tight fit in the step and partners etc. However some aspects of the FD are a bit special so try this way of sorting boat out and getting set for the race. Set up the genoa: The most important control of an FD is the genoa halyard, controlling the mast rake. This needs the purchase of at least 24:1 led to either side of the boat for the helmsman to adjust while hiking. A courser adjustment, say 6:1, is also ideal for changing between the different clew attachment positions available in modern genoas. We use a 6:1 purchase on the back face of the mast which hooks up to the genoa halyard. One end of this goes directly to a clam-cleat for the course adjustment and this marked with a position for each clew. The other end goes to 4:1 purchase running along the boats centreline and led to each side.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 Ship Compartmentation and Watertight Integrity
    CHAPTER 3 SHIP COMPARTMENTATION AND WATERTIGHT INTEGRITY Learning Objectives: Recall the definitions of terms watertight integrity, and how they relate to each other. used to define the structure of the hull of a ship and the You will also learn about compartment checkoff lists, numbering systems used for compartment number the DC closure log, the proper care of access closures designations. Identify the different types of watertight and fittings, compartment inspections, the ship’s draft, closures and recall the inspection procedures for the and the sounding and security patrol watch. The closures. Recall the requirements for the three material information in this chapter will assist you in conditions of readiness, the purpose and use of the completing your personnel qualification standards Compartment Checkoff List (CCOL) and damage (PQS) for basic damage control. control closure log, and the procedures for checking watertight integrity. COMPARTMENTATION A ship’s ability to resist sinking after sustaining Learning Objective: Recall the definitions of terms damage depends largely on the ship’s used to define the structure of the hull of a ship and the compartmentation and watertight integrity. When numbering systems used to identify the different these features are maintained properly, fires and compartments of a ship. flooding can be isolated within a limited area. Without compartmentation or watertight integrity, a ship faces The compartmentation of a ship is a major feature almost certain doom if it is severely damaged and the of its watertight integrity. Compartmentation divides emergency damage control (DC) teams are not the interior area of a ship’s hull into smaller spaces by properly trained or equipped.
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvania
    Spring 1991 $1.50 Pennsylvania • The Keystone States Official Boating Magazine Viewpoint Recently we received a letter suggesting that we were being contradictory in Boat Pennsylvania. According to one reader, we suggested that boaters wear personal flota- tion devices, but that the magazine photographs don't always show their use. Obtaining photographs for a magazine can be a difficult proposition. Sometimes we stage situations and take the photographs ourselves. More often, we rely on photographs submitted by contributors. Photos that depict the general boating public often do not show people wearing PFDs simply because the incidence of wearing them is so low. If we were to say that we would only use photos that showed boaters wearing PFDs, we would have a difficult time fmding acceptable photos. Generally, we try to show people wearing PFDs in small boats in situations in which devices should obviously be worn. On large boats, people most often do not wear their PFDs. Should people wear PFDs? Statistics show that wearing a PFD can save your life. Are PFDs needed all the time? Because accidents happen when they are least expected, wearing a PFD all the time is a good idea. Practically, however, as comfortable as the newest PFDs are, they can be excruciating on a hot July day. Many boaters also want to get a little sun. We accept this and our statistics show that the chances of having an accident where a PFD would have been a factor are much lower in the summer months. Ofcourse, circumstances do exist in which wearing a PFD,even on the hottest day, is warranted.
    [Show full text]
  • 35 CFR Ch. I (7–1–98 Edition)
    § 109.5 35 CFR Ch. I (7±1±98 Edition) (b) The number of Canal deckhands not less than 100 square inches (645 to be placed on board a transiting ves- square centimeters) in areaÐpreferred sel to assist her crew in handling tow- dimensions are 12 x 9 inches (305 x 229 ing wires in the locks. millimeters)Ðand shall be capable of withstanding a strain of 100,000 pounds § 109.5 Ship's gear to be ready during (43,331 kilograms) on a towing wire transit; test. from any direction. Before beginning transit of the (e) Chocks designated as double Canal, a vessel shall have hawsers, chocks shall have a throat opening of lines and fenders ready for passing not less than 140 square inches (903 through the locks, for warping, towing, square centimeters) in areaÐpreferred or mooring as the case may be; and dimensions are 14 x 10 inches (356 x 254 shall have both anchors ready for let- millimeters)Ðand shall be capable of ting go. The Master shall assure him- withstanding a strain of 140,000 pounds self, by actual test, of the readiness of (64,000 kilograms) on the towing wires his vessel's main engines, steering from any direction. gear, engine room telegraphs, whistle, (f) Use of roller chocks is permissible rudder-angle and engine-revolution in- provided they are not less than 14.94 dicators, and anchors. During the tran- meters (49 feet) above the waterline at sit, at all times while a vessel is under- the vessel's maximum Panama Canal way or moored against the lock walls, draft and provided they are in good her deck winches, capstans, and other condition, meet all of the requirements power equipment for handling lines, as for solid chocks as specified in para- well as her mooring bitts, chocks, graphs (a), (b), (c), and (d) of this sec- cleats, hawse pipes, etc., shall be ready tion, as the case may be, and are so for handling the vessel, to the exclu- fitted that transition from the rollers sion of all other work.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Sailboat Autopilot
    Sailboat Autopilot: Mainsheet Tender Module Jonathan Harris Engineering 90 2007 – 2008 Professor Fred Orthlieb 1 Abstract The Art of sailing a wind powered vessel relies heavily on the ability of the crew to trim the sails. Finding the right angle of the sail with respect to the vessel will apply the optimal amount of force with the least amount of drag on the boat. Using the idea that there is an optimal sail angle, a device has been constructed which based on wind direction relative to the boat calculates the optimal sail angle and adjusts the mainsheet accordingly. The tender is designed as a modular system that functions independent of an autopilot program that would be set to maintain a heading, hence it can be used with any autopilot system currently on the market or used independently with a sailor steering the vessel. 2 Acknowledgements Without the assistance of the Engineering Faculty and staff at Swarthmore College, this project would not be. I would like to thank the following professors for their assistance in bringing me to where I am today, and helping me complete this project. Fred Orthlieb Lynne Molter Erik Cheever Ani Hsieh Tali Moreshet Bruce Maxwell Nelson Macken Carr Everbach Grant Smith Doug Judy Don Reynolds Holly Castleman Thank you. 3 Table of Contents Abstract 2 Acknowledgements 3 Overview of the E90 Program at Swarthmore College 5 Objective 8 Reasons for Construction 9 Theory 11 Project Overview 33 Project Specifications 35 Design and Construction: Motor Selection 37 Motor Controller Selection 39 Battery Selection 41 Vishay Smart Position Sensors 43 Gears 44 Circuit Design 45 Testing 48 Discussion 49 Lessons Learned 51 Conclusion 52 Appendix 54 4 Overview of the E90 Program at Swarthmore College “Students work on a design project that is the culminating exercise for all senior engineering majors.
    [Show full text]