sign in sign up
<<
Home , American alligator, American mink, Florida panther, Puma (genus)

Puma concolor (Linnaeus, 1771) Margaret K. Trani and Brian R. Chapman

CONTENT AND TAXONOMIC COMMENTS The taxonomic classification of the concolor group was revised and described by Nelson and Goldman (1929) and Young and Goldman (1946). Nowell and Jackson (1996) reviewed the and placed the mountain into the (Clark 2001, Baker et al. 2003). The mountain lion includes 15 recognized (Wilson and Ruff 1999); however, Culver et al. (2000) proposed a reduction of the genus to six subspecies based on . The only known reproducing pop- ulation of mountain in the South today is that of the subspecies P. c. coryi,theFloridapanther (Whitaker and Hamilton 1998, U. S. and Wildlife Service 2006). The life history of the mountain lion is reviewed by Currier (1983) and Lindzey (1987). Beier et al. (2003) and the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (2006) reviewed the literature on the panther.

DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTICS The mountain lion is the largest native North Ameri- can . Measurements are: total length, 150–274 cm; , 53.5–90.0 cm; hind foot, 22.0–29.5 cm; ear, 7.5–10.0 cm; weight, 35–100 kg. Adult dorsal pelage is tan but may appear grayish, reddish, or brownish. The cylindrical tail is long and is usually tipped with black. The ears are rounded and lack tufts or black coloration. The pads of the feet have a distinctive three-lobed appearance and the toes are equipped with long, sharp, retractile claws. The skull is short and rounded dorsally with a blunt rostrum and is distinguished from that of the ( rufus)by size and number of teeth. The mountain lion skull exceeds 130 mm in length and has four cheek teeth in the upper jaw whereas the bobcat skull is smaller and has only three upper cheek teeth. The skull of the is unique, with a flat, frontal region Figure 1. Dorsal, ventral, and lateral view of cranium with broad, high-arched nasal bones (Young and and lateral view of mandible of Puma concolor from Goldman 1946). The dental formula is I 3/3, C 1/1, Gila County, (USNM 271971 female). P 3/2, M 1/1 = 30 (Figure 1). See keys for details. The Florida panther is unspotted and typically rusty expressions of inbreeding (Seal 1994). Since genetic reddish-brown on the back, tawny on the sides, and introgression with the mountain lion (P. c. stanleyana) pale gray underneath. A right angle crook (kink) released into Florida from west in 1995, these near the end of the tail and a hair whorl (cowlick) in characteristics have dramatically decreased (Land the middle of the back were commonly observed in et al. 2004). Florida panthers through the early 1990s (U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2006). These were considered

The Land Manager's Guide to of the South 457 Mountain Lion (Puma concolor)

CONSERVATION STATUS The mountain lion has a global rank of Secure (NatureServe 2007). In Florida, is it considered Apparently Secure. It is Presumed Extirpated in and Kentucky and Possibly Extirpated in , , and . It is Imperiled in Texas and Critically Imperiled in , , , and . It is unranked in Virginia. The U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (U. S. Department of the Interior 2007) lists P. c. coryiasEndangered.

DISTRIBUTION The historical distribution of the mountain lion extended from southern through most of the into (Hall 1981, Choate et al. 1994, Whitaker and Hamilton 1998). The Figure 2. Distribution of Puma concolor in the South. disappeared from much of the during the latter half of the last century (Downing 1984, McBride et al. 1993). Although generally con- Hendry, Dade, and Monroe counties south of the sidered unreliable (U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Belden et al. 1991). Radio-col- 2006), sightings of mountain lions occasionally occur lared male panthers and uncollared males killed by throughout the South. These include areas through- vehicles (McBride 2002, Belden and McBride 2005) out the central Appalachians in Virginia (Handley have also been recorded in 11 counties within central 1991) and the southern Appalachians of North and northeastern Florida (Figure 2). Between 1988–1995, Carolina and Tennessee in or near the Great Smoky 26 Texas mountain lions were released near Mountains National Park (Linzey 1995). Sealander Okefenokee National Wildlife Refuge and Osceola and Heidt (1990) believed that mountain lions might National Forest to evaluate the feasibility of reintro- be present in the Ozark-Ouachita Mountains of ducing panthers into unoccupied areas of their his- Arkansas. Recent observations include Oklahoma toric range. Although the successfully (Pike et al. 1999), Louisiana (Leberg et al. 2004), and established territories in the reintroduction areas Arkansas (Witsell et al. 1999, Clark et al. 2002). How- (U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2006), they were sub- ever, the origins of these reported animals could not sequently removed from the wild at the end of the be determined. They may have been released captive study. animals (Pike et al. 1997, Heck 1998) or dispersing subadult males from northern and western popula- ABUNDANCE STATUS tions (C. Belden, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, per- sonal communication). The dispersal of mountain The Florida panther is secretive and occurs at low lion over long distances (1067 km) recently described densities. In the early 1970s, Nowak and McBride (1974) in the Black Hills of (Thompson and estimated the population from Lake Okeechobee Jenks 2005) and reports of verified sightings in the southward at 20–30 animals. After this initial research, Badlands of (North Dakota and additional surveys on public and private lands were Fish Department 2006) suggest that these are poten- completed (Belden et al. 1991). Maehr et al. (1991a) 2 tial source populations in addition to those in west- estimated a density of 1 panther/110 km based on ern and southern Texas. extrapolation of areas occupied by radio-collared panthers during the period 1985–1990 for southwest Currently, the only known reproducing population Florida. McBride (2003) reported a minimum popula- of mountain lions in the South is in Florida (Belden tion estimate of 87 panthers based upon a count of et al. 1988, Maehr 1992, Foster and Humphrey 1995, adult and subadult panthers. Today, the panther is Land et al. 1998, Main and Richardson 2002). Histori- restricted to a breeding population of less than 100 cally, the Florida panther ranged from Arkansas and animals (U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2006). Louisiana east to portions of South Carolina and south to Florida (Clark 2001). The panther’s current breeding range includes the Big Cypress and physiographic region in Collier, Lee,

458 The Land Manager's Guide to Mammals of the South Mountain Lion (Puma concolor)

PRIMARY HABITATS FOOD HABITS The Florida panther uses a mosaic of habitats for The white-tailed (Odocoileus virginianus)and denning, , and dispersal. These include cypress pig (Sus scrofa) are the dominant prey species of ( distichum) , live oak (Quercus the Florida panther (Maehr et al. 1990, Dalrymple virginiana) hammocks, pine flatwoods, cabbage palm and 1996). In the northern portion of its range, (Sabal palmetto) forests, flooded , sawgrass feral pigs comprise the bulk of the diet, whereas ( jamaicense) , and agricultural lands white-tailed deer are more important in the southern (Belden 1986, Maehr 1992). Kautz et al. (in press) portion (Clark 2001). The northern ( reported that forest patches of variable size are lotor), nine-banded armadillo ( novemcinctus), important components of the panther landscape, and (Sylvilagus palustris)areofsecond- although the species will also use non-forested habi- ary importance (Dalrymple and Bass 1996). Seasonal tats (Comiskey et al. 2002). Den sites are often variation in the diet has not been detected (U. S. Fish located in dense, understory vegetation such as saw and Wildlife Service 2007). An adult male consumes palmetto (Serona repens; Land et al. 1998). Shindle et the equivalent of one white-tailed deer every 8–11 al. (2003) reported that 73% of panther dens were days; this frequency is 14–17 days for a female located in palmetto thickets. Panther habitat use is (Ackerman et al. 1986). Maehr et al. (1990a)docu- also related to prey availability (Janis and Clark 1999, mented domestic livestock infrequently in scats or Dees et al. 2001). Although daytime habitat use from kills, although were readily available on their radio-telemetry indicates that panthers use the study area. majority of habitats available to them, additional nocturnal research is required to provide a compre- ASSOCIATED SPECIES hensive understanding of panther habitat relation- ships (Beier et al. 2003). In addition to its primary prey species, the panther commonly occurs in habitats occupied by the swamp rabbit (Sylvilagus aquaticus), round-tailed (Neofiber alleni), (Oryzomys palustris), Age at first reproduction for the female panther ( latrans), common gray ( ranges between 1.8–3.2 years; successful reproduction cinereoargenteus), northern river ( canadensis), has occurred up to 11 years of age (U. S. Fish and striped ( mephitis), and American Wildlife Service 2007). may not occur until a (Mustela vison). Potential competitors of the Florida is established (Maehr et al. 1989). Male pan- panther include the American black ( thers are polygynous, maintaining large, overlapping americanus), bobcat, and American (Alligator home ranges containing several adult females and mississippiensis; Beier et al. 2003). their offspring. The average age at sexual maturity is 3 years (Maehr et al. 1991), although some males may VULNERABILITY AND THREATS breed as early as 17 months (U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2007). The breeding activity peaks between Habitat loss and degradation are significant threats December–March (Shindle et al. 2003). Gestation to the continued survival of the panther throughout lasts 90–96 days (Maehr 1992). Prior to giving , its range (Belden 1986, Maehr 1992, U. S. Fish and females establish den sites which may include rock Wildlife Service 2007). Intolerant of human distur- crevices, brush piles, thickets, and uprooted bance, panthers are sensitive to (Maehr et al. 1989; 1990b). Although litters are pro- stemming from road construction, agricultural devel- duced throughout the year, most occur opment, and urban expansion (Beier et al. 2003). Ille- between May–June (Jansen et al. 2005). The average gal shooting and highway collision also are major litter size ranges from 2–3 kittens; the mean birth problems; off-road vehicle traffic has increased in interval between litters is 20 months (Lotz et al. 2005). , making accessible large areas that for- Females that lose their litters generally produce merly had been isolated wilderness (Clark 2001). Due another within an average of 10.4 months (Land 1994). to habitat alteration, a reduced prey base also is a Den sites are used for up to two months by female concern. The Florida panther is susceptible to infec- panthers and their litters. Dispersal of young typi- tious disease such as feline leukemia and cally occurs at 18 months, but may occur as early as virus and environmental contaminants such as mer- 12 months (Maehr 1992). cury, polychlorinated biphenyls, and organochlorines (Land et al. 2004, Newman et al. 2004). Finally, the problems associated with being a small, isolated pop- ulation have resulted in the loss of genetic variabil- ity. Panther populations are losing genetic diversity

The Land Manager's Guide to Mammals of the South 459 Mountain Lion (Puma concolor) by 3–7 percent per generation (Clark 2001). Data on REFERENCES polymorphism and physiological abnormalities sug- gest that the panther population has experienced Ackerman, B. B., F. G. Lindzey, and T. P. Hemker. 1986. Predictive energetics model for . Pages 333–352 inbreeding depression (Roelke et al. 1993, Barone et in S. D. Miller and D. D. Everett, editors. of the al. 1994). To address this problem, eight female Texas world: Biology, conservation, and management. puma were released into South Florida in 1995 (U. S. National Wildlife Federation and Caesar Kleberg Fish and Wildlife Service 2006). The initial results Wildlife Research Institute, Washington, D. C., USA. have been promising: atrial septal defects and Baker, R. J., L. C. Bradley, R. D. Bradley, J. W. Dragoo, cryptorchidism have not been found in introgressed M.D.Engstrom,R.S.Hoffman,C.A.Jones,F.Reed, panthers, while the occurrence of kinked and D. W. Rice, and C. Jones. 2003. Revised checklist of cowlicks in intercross progeny has been reduced North American mammals north of Mexico, 2003. (Land et al. 2004). Occasional Papers, The Museum, Texas Tech University 229:1–23. MANAGEMENT SUGGESTIONS Barone, M. A., M. E. Roekle, J. Howard, J. L. Brown, A. E. Anderson, and D. E. Wildt. 1994. Reproductive Because the Florida panther range includes public characteristics of male Florida panthers: Comparative and private lands, coordination of management and studies from Florida, Texas, Colorado, Latin America, proactive land use planning is essential. The key to and North American zoos. Journal of Mammalogy panther conservation is the protection and acquisition 75:150–162. of large, interconnected blocks of suitable habitat. Beier P., M. R. Vaughan, M. J. Conroy, and H. Quigley. Objectives of the recovery plan focus on achieving 2003. An analysis of scientific literature related to the long-term viability (U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Florida panther. Final report, Project NG01-105, Florida 2007). These include: (1) maintaining and expanding Fish and Commission, the panther population and its habitat in South Tallahassee, Florida, USA. Florida; (2) providing for the expansion of the breed- Belden, R. C. 1986. Florida panther recovery plan ing population into south-central Florida; (3) facili- implementation: A progress report. Pages 159–172 in tating panther recovery through public awareness S. D. Miller and D. D. Everett, editors. Cats of the world: Biology, conservation, and management. and education; and (4) establishing viable popula- National Wildlife Federation, Washington, D. C., USA. tions of the panther in potential reintroduction areas in other parts of the South. Thatcher et al. (2006) Belden, R. C., and R. T. McBride. 2005. Florida panther peripheral areas survey final report 1998–2004. Florida identified prospective sites for panther reintroduc- Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, tion within the historic range based on several land- Tallahassee, Florida, USA. scape parameters (e.g., natural and urban land cover, Belden, R. C., W. B. Frankenberger, and J. C. Roof. 1991. contagion, patch density, human population density, Florida panther distribution. Final Report 7501, E-1 and road density). Of the nine areas identified, the II-E-1. Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, Okefenokee National Wildlife Refuge in Georgia, Tallahassee, Florida, USA. and the Ozark National Forest and Felsenthal Belden,R.C.,W.B.Frankenberger,R.T.McBride,and National Wildlife Refuge in Arkansas rank as the top S. T. Schwikert. 1988. Panther habitat use in southern prospective reintroduction sites based on effective Florida. Journal of Wildlife Management 52:660–663. habitat area and expert opinion (Thatcher et al. 2006). Choate, J. R., J. K. Jones, Jr., and C. Jones. 1994. Handbook Additional conservation measures include imple- of mammals of the south-central states. Louisiana State menting a management plan to monitor University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA. physical and physiological characteristics correlated Clark, J. D. 2001. Florida panther. Pages 234–239 in with the depletion of genetic variability; devising J. Dickson, editor. Wildlife of the southern forests: appropriate biomedical strategies to limit population Habitat and management. Hancock House, Blaine, Washington, USA. disease threats; and actively managing white-tailed deer and populations and their habitats. The Clark,D.W.,S.C.White,A.K.Bowers,L.D.Lucio,and construction of wildlife crossings, road signs, and G. A. Heidt. 2002. A survey of recent accounts of the mountain lion (Puma concolor) in Arkansas. fencing can ameliorate highway fatalities where Southeastern Naturalist 1:269–278. roadways intersect panther habitat; incorporating habitat connectivity and dispersal corridors into road Comiskey, E. J., O. L. Bass, Jr., L. J. Gross, R. T. McBride, and R. Salinas. 2002. Panthers and forests in South expansion projects is key. Public support is critical to Florida: An ecological perspective. Conservation attainment of recovery goals and reintroduction Ecology 6:18. efforts; political and social issues must be resolved Culver,M.,W.E.Johnson,J.Pecon-Slattery,andS.J. before these efforts are initiated. O’Brien. 2000. Genomic ancestry of the American puma (Puma concolor). Journal of Heredity 91:186–197.

460 The Land Manager's Guide to Mammals of the South Mountain Lion (Puma concolor)

Currier, M. J. P. 1983. Felis concolor. Mammalian Species Lindzey, F. 1987. Mountain lion. Pages 657–668 in 200:1–7. M. Novak, J. A. Baker, M. E. Obbard, and B. Malloch, Dalrymple, G. H., and O. L. Bass. 1996. The diet of the editors. Wild furbearer management and conservation Florida panther in , Florida. in . Ontario Ministry of Natural Bulletin of the Florida Museum of Natural History Resources, Toronto, Canada. 39:173–193. Linzey, D. W. 1995. Mammals of Great Smoky Mountains Dees, C. S., J. D. Clark, and F. T. Van Manen. 2001. Florida National Park. McDonald and Woodward, Blacksburg, panther habitat use in response to prescribed fire. Virginia, USA. Journal of Wildlife Management 65:141–147. Lotz, M., D. Land, M. Cunningham, and B. Ferree. 2005. Downing, R. L. 1984. The search for cougars in the eastern Florida panther annual report: 2004–2005. Florida Fish United States. Cryptozoology 3:31–49. and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Tallahassee, Florida, USA. Foster, M. L., and S. R. Humphrey. 1995. Use of highway underpasses by Florida panthers and other wildlife. Maehr, D. S. 1990. The Florida panther and private lands. Wildlife Society Bulletin 23:95–100. Conservation Biology 4:167–170. Hall, E. R. 1981. The mammals of North America, Second Maehr, D. S. 1992. Florida panther. Pages 176–189 in S. R. edition. John Wiley and Sons, , New York, Humphrey, editor. Rare and endangered biota of USA. Florida: Volume I, Mammals. , Gainesville, Florida, USA. Handley, C. O., Jr. 1991. The mammals. Pages 539–616 in K. Terwilliger, coordinator. Virginia’s endangered Maehr, D. S., E. D. Land, and J. C. Roof. 1991. Social species: Proceedings of a symposium. McDonald and ecology of Florida panthers. National Geographic Woodward, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA. Research and Exploration 7:414–431. Heck, B. A. 1998. Mountain lion cranium from McCurtain Maehr,D.S.,E.D.Land,J.C.Roof,andJ.W.McCown. County, Oklahoma. Proceedings of the Oklahoma 1989. Early maternal behavior in the Florida panther Academy of Science 78:127–128. (Felis concolor coryi). American Midland Naturalist 122:34–43. Janis, M. W., and J. D. Clark. 1999. The effects of recreational deer and hog hunting on the behavior of Maehr, D. S., R. C. Belden, E. D. Land, and L. Wilkins. Florida panthers. Final report to Big Cypress National 1990a. Food habits of panthers in southwest Florida. Preserve, National Park Service, Ochopee, Florida, USA. Journal of Wildlife Management 54:420–423. Jansen, D. K., S. R. Schulze, and A. T. Johnson. 2005. Maehr,D.S.,E.D.Land,J.C.Roof,andJ.W.McCown. Florida panther (Puma concolor coryi) research and 1990b. Day beds, natal dens, and activity of Florida monitoring in Big Cypress : Annual panthers. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the report 2004–2005. National Park Service, Ochopee, Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies Florida, USA. 44:310–318. Kautz,R.,R.Kawula,T.Hoctor,J.Comiskey,D.Jansen, Maehr,D.S.,J.C.Roof,E.D.Land,J.W.McCown,and D. Jennings, J. Kasbohm, F. Mazzotti, R. McBride, R. T. McBride. 1992. Home range characteristics of a L. Richardson, and K. . In press. How much is panther in south central Florida. Florida Field enough? Landscape-scale conservation for the Florida Naturalist 20:97–103. panther. Biological Conservation. Main, M. B., and L. W. Richardson. 2002. Response of Land, E. D. 1994. Response of the wild Florida panther wildlife to prescribed fire in southwest Florida population to removals for captive breeding. Final flatwoods. Wildlife Society Bulletin 30:213–221. Report 7571. Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish McBride, R. T. 2002. Current panther distribution and Commission, Tallahassee, Florida, USA. conservation implications: Fall 2001-Winter 2002. Land, E. D., D. R. Garman, and G. A. Holt. 1998. Report to Florida Panther Subteam of MERIT, U. S. Fish Monitoring female Florida panthers via cellular and Wildlife Service, Vero Beach, Florida, USA. telephone. Wildlife Society Bulletin 26:29–31. McBride, R. T. 2003. The documented panther population Land, D., D. Shindle, M. Cunningham, M. Lotz, and (DPP) and its current distribution from July 1, 2002 to B. Ferree. 2004. Florida panther genetic restoration and June 30, 2003. Appendix IV in D. Shindle, M. Cunningham, management annual report: 2003–2004. Florida Fish and D.Land,R.McBride,M.Lotz,andB.Ferree,editors. Wildlife Conservation Commission, Tallahassee, Florida panther genetic restoration and management. Florida, USA. Annual report 93112503002. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Tallahassee, Florida, USA. Leberg, P. L., M. R. Carloss, L. J. Dugas, K. L. Pilgrim, L. S. Mills, M. C. Green, and D. Scognamillo. 2004. Recent McBride,R.T.,R.M.McBride,J.L.Cashman,andD.S. record of a (Puma concolor) in Louisiana, with Maehr. 1993. Do mountain lions exist in Arkansas? notes on diet, based on analysis of fecal materials. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies 47:394–402.

The Land Manager's Guide to Mammals of the South 461 Mountain Lion (Puma concolor)

NatureServe. 2007. An online encyclopedia of life [Database]. Sealander, J. A., Jr., and G. A. Heidt. 1990. Arkansas Version 6.1. Association for Biodiversity Information. mammals: Their natural history, classification and http://www.natureserve.org/. distribution. University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Nelson, E. W., and E. A. Goldman. 1929. List of the pumas Arkansas, USA. with three described as new. Journal of Mammalogy ShindleD.,M.Cunningham,D.Land,R.McBride,M.Lotz, 10:345–350. and B. Ferree. 2003. Florida panther genetic restoration Newman, J., E. Zillioux, E. Rich, L. Liang, and C. Newman. and management. Annual Report 93112503002. Florida 2004. Historical and other patterns of monomethyl and Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, inorganic mercury in the Florida panther (Puma concolor Tallahassee, Florida, USA. coryi). Archives of Environmental Contaminants and Thatcher, C., F. T. van Manen, and J. D. Clark. 2006. Toxicology 48:75–80. Identifying suitable sites for Florida panther North Dakota Game and Fish Department. 2006. Status of reintroduction. Journal of Wildlife Management mountain lions (Puma concolor) in North Dakota: 70:752–763. A report to the legislative council. North Dakota Game Thompson, D. J., and J. A. Jenks. 2005. Long-distance and Fish Department, Bismarck, North Dakota, USA. dispersal by a subadult male cougar from the Black Nowak, R. M., and R. T. McBride. 1974. Status survey of Hills, South Dakota. Journal of Wildlife Management the Florida panther. Project 973. World Wildlife Fund 69:818–820. Yearbook 1973–74:237–242. U. S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. Nowell, K., and P. Jackson. 1996. Status survey and 2007. Southeast Region 4. conservation action plan: Wild cats. International Union http://www.endangered.fws.gov/wildlife/html. for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2006. Technical/Agency Burlington, Cambridge, . Draft, Florida Panther Recovery Plan (Puma concolor Pike, J. R., J. H. Shaw, and D. M. Leslie, Jr. 1997. The coryi), Third Revision. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service. mountain lion in Oklahoma and surrounding states. Atlanta, Georgia, USA. Proceedings of the Oklahoma Academy of Science Whitaker, J. O. and W. J. Hamilton, Jr. 1998. Mammals of 77:39–42. the Eastern United States. Comstock Publishing, Ithaca, Pike,J.R.,J.H.Shaw,D.M.Leslie,Jr.,andM.G.Shaw. New York, USA. 1999. A geographic analysis of the status of mountain Wilson, D. E., and S. Ruff, editors. 1999. The Smithsonian lions in Oklahoma. Wildlife Society Bulletin 27:4–11. book of North American mammals. Smithsonian Roekle, M. E., J. S. Martenson, and S. J. O’Brien. 1993. The Institution, Washington, D. C., USA. consequences of demographic reduction and genetic Witsell,T.,G.A.Heidt,P.L.Dozhier,T.Frothingham,and depletion in the endangered Florida panther. Current M. Lynn. 1999. Recent documentation of mountain lion Biology 3:340–350. (Puma concolor) in Arkansas. Journal of the Arkansas Seal, U. S., editor. 1994. A plan for genetic restoration and Academy of Science 53:157–158. management of the Florida panther (Felis concolor coryi). Young, S. P., and E. A. Goldman. 1946. The puma, Report to the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish mysterious American cat. The American Wildlife Commission by the Conservation Breeding Specialist Institute, Washington, D. C., USA. Group, Species Survival Commission, IUCN, Apple Valley, Minnesota, USA.

462 The Land Manager's Guide to Mammals of the South