Gender Mobility

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Gender Mobility This text is an unedited draft on the basis of which the speaker delivered a seminar, talk or lecture at the venue(s) and event(s) cited below. The title and content of each presentation varied in response to the context. There is a slide-show below that accompanies this document. If the text has been worked upon and published in the form of an essay, details about the version(s) and publication(s) are included in the section pertaining to Geeta Kapur’s published texts. Venues • Lecture: ‘Gender Mobility: through the lens of five women artists’, Faculty of Fine Arts, M.S.U., Baroda, 5th December 2006 • Lecture: ‘Play of Self and Gender’, Irish Museum of Modern Art, Dublin, July 2007 (without Tejal Shah) • Lecture: ‘Through the Lens: gender in performance’, School of Arts and Aesthetics, J.N.U., New Delhi, March 2008 • Lecture: ‘Through the Lens: gender in performance’, India Moderna exhibition talk, IVAM (Institut Valencia d’Art Moderna), Valencia, February 2009 Gender Mobility: Through the Lens of Five Women Artists in India Feminist practice is, in its radical definition, provocative; in its more reflexive aspect it complicates the otherness of gendered sexuality, taking it beyond the narrow historicity of sexual antinomies—and toward a calibrated and critical account of “difference.” Female artists have devised means to materially transfigure sanctioned notions of identity, to push corporeality into interpretative possibilities at once nurturing and uncanny, to test the paradox of “mimesis and alterity”1 by a theatrical rendering of gender. Often compelled by the lure (and revulsion) of beauty, these artists play on the polyvalence of masquerade—from a wounding narcissism to fetishist forms of cross-gender sexuality, to a performativity that mocks the politics of representation. If we understand that art and culture in the cosmopolitan contemporary are driven by forms of representation that are as often simulacral as they are authentic, then feminists are often the ones to read either aspect of representation against the grain. Working against or beyond the universality presumed by phallocentric authority, they bring to the condition of oppression something more than ideological identification based on binary categories. The battle against 1 binaries is above all against the primal binary of male and female (man and woman), the premise of which must be questioned in order to demolish the metaphysics that surmounts it and dominates all existential questions. Feminist consciousness reduplicates the experience of loss in order to gain a contrary mandate: for a promise of survival incarnating, in the form of a witness, the pain and desire, the abjection and refusal, of otherness. Feminism is a discourse against power; feminist artists, refusing to accept the formal closure of (late) modernist art, translate feminism’s deconstructive “genius” along an itinerary of subversions; along such reconstitutive hypotheses that address the issue of power conceptually, retroactively. The questions investigated by the vast body of feminist literature rotate around representation as a psychosocial act. However, it is by complicating these into semiotic conundrums that meaning is elicited. Rosalind Krauss’s warning, not to take the signified as a given, not to lunge for it in an interpretative overkill,2 is crucial in understanding the strategy and ethics of representation. It is not enough to work a critique of “woman as image”; we should have to chase after the signifiers and arrive at indirect (allegorical?) reconfigurations that lead beyond the image to the limit of formlessness. Further, the very category of woman and, therefore, of sex and gender, suggests a juridical redefinition such as Judith Butler offers and contests. Asking for a deconstruction of the very terms of discourse on which gendered existence is premised, Butler promotes the ironies at play in the performance of gender.3 With the sign—visual, performative, discursive4—under scrutiny, the questions relevant to aesthetics come to the fore: fetishism5 in the exchange-driven economies of commodity and spectacle; contrariwise, the restorative possibilities of beauty and also those of mourning.6 Some of these modalities within feminism are direct provocations for the practice of art. In the present essay, I take the example of five women artists working in India with lens-based images (Nalini Malani, Pushpamala N., Dayanita Singh, Sonia Khurana, Tejal Shah), seeing how each of them addresses core questions about gender and representation, and how they open up detours specific to the Indian context. For this purpose, the framework implies cultural configurations that articulate gender according to certain customs and protocols. But the detours also crisscross into more individual versions where artists with distinct sexual attitudes can inscribe their practice, tendentiously, within the ongoing movement of global feminisms. Remythologizing How shall we conduct a transaction between the victim and the witness, between these two key signs, where the one verges on mortality and the other serves for a living testimony, and both together establish a large part of the iconography of twentieth-century art? The two designations 2 have been especially important within feminist and postcolonial discourses and, in both cases, the stereotype has been activated to conduct that transaction. There is the stereotype imposed in the act of othering; there is also the stereotype construed like an artifice by the subject herself, garnering attributes, mimicking the iconic—and averting the temptation to cast these ironies into instrumentalized iconographies. This opens up a debate on what an ethics of self-representation might be; specifically, on how the female “self,” identified in all its contestations, might be figured within the extended discourse of representational politics.7 Both Nalini Malani and Pushpamala, borrowing stereotypes of Indian women from the nineteenth and twentieth centuries and bringing them up-to-date, prod the questions posed above. Believing themselves to inhabit what is now called a postnational society, they address the national nevertheless. On site in the painting or photograph or video are female preceptors who act out meek or divine stereotypes, or stereotypes of the female grotesque; but who can, on reflection, be recast as the (dissembling) interlocutors of those more grand identities that characterize the national. Malani’s video-narratives are frequently based on well-known plays, stories, and social critiques.8 She chooses texts that embody dispossession, that allegorize the nation’s betrayal of its citizenry, that index the level of loss entailed by the populace in relation to the state. In inverse proportion to the developmental ambitions of the nation-state, Malani tries to materialize through image what Veena Das calls social suffering,9 and her choice of mode for this purpose is almost always tragic. In the single-channel video installation titled Unity in Diversity (4 images), Nalini Malani animates a nineteenth-century oil painting (Ravi Varma’s Galaxy of Musicians, c. 188910) in which a tiered group-portrait of Indian women, holding musical instruments and costumed according to ethnic type and region, serves as a tableau allegorizing the diverse and unified nation, the civilizational slogan Indians repeat in the hope of sustaining a secular, multireligious, multiethnic, and democratically structured polity. Malani’s galaxy mutates through a painterly rendering of video animation: a flesh-and-blood actor underwrites the images of her painted sisters, and the surface shudders with the uncanny overlapping of dead and alive women. The screen replicates an “Old Master” painting encased in a frame, and the pleasure of its pictorial imagery—blooming, twitching, dissolving—is shot through with omens. A gunshot causes us to regain consciousness in an India rent by religious violence.11 The screen breaks into palpitating viscera—an intrusion, a probing that might, in a Surrealist take on body metaphors, stand for rape. The short narrative closes with insurgent women wearing head scarves and carrying guns; a 3 voiceover sees the transfiguration support the right of representation—urging us to name by whom, and how, this right may be elaborated. Malani has always worked through certain psychoanalytic tropes: with neurosis that virtually forms the iconography of “woman”; and with the wounded female body—a personification of “lack,” fetishized through the masculinist gaze. Staking her artist’s chance on finding a way out of a corrupted condition, Malani messes with the glutinous accretions that adhere to the “real,” and melds into this matter her painter’s voracity for blood and gore from the victim’s body. In the very process, her female figures, mutilated by war and violation and other, more invisible metonymies of patriarchal violence, take repossession of themselves and, grabbing what is not-yet-language, work with gestures that are at once raw and reparative, and always also cathartic, in the expressionist sense of that word.12 Her multiscreen video installations are directly political and even topical, elaborately narrativizing war, bombings, ethnic cleansing, civil conflict, public murder;13 her “shadow-plays” are, on the other hand, sublimated into room-size chimeras echoing with cosmic demonology, human desire.14 Hosts of “figures” (shot, scribbled, animated) pass through the world as through scrims (screens, Mylar, walls) and crowd the threshold in surreal mutations. With these veiled icons, reality cedes to a charade of representation. Shadows and echoes, a chorus of lament rewinds itself again and again as in her early rendition of the Medea myth.15 Meanings chase themselves into an abyss, and Malani plucks out female stereotypes, shattered and bereft, pleading the need for a definitive dis-closure. In continuing to offer tales of terror and pity, her work becomes complicit with fate: are her maneuvers already, as it were, cursed, and therefore swept into hermeneutic closure? Malani belongs to a generation, and a tradition, that does not shy from producing replete imagery that still seeks to enrich secular culture with an image-code.
Recommended publications
  • TIARA Research Final-Online
    TIARAResearch Insight Based Research Across Celebrities Indian Institute of Human Brands 2020 About IIHBThe Indian Institute of Human Brands (IIHB) has been set up by Dr. Sandeep Goyal, India’s best known expert in the domain of celebrity studies. Dr. Goyal is a PhD from FMS-Delhi and has been researching celebrities as human brands since 2003. IIHB has many well known academicians and researchers on its advisory board ADVISORY Board D. Nandkishore Prof. ML Singla Former Global Executive Board Former Dean Member - Nestlé S.A., Switzerland FMS Delhi Dr. Sandeep Goyal Chief Mentor Dr. Goyal is former President of Rediffusion, ex-Group CEO B. Narayanaswamy Prof. Siddhartha Singh of Zee Telefilms and was Founder Former Managing Director Associate Professor of Marketing Chairman of Dentsu India IPSOS and Former Senior Associate Dean, ISB 0 1 WHY THIS STUDY? Till 20 years ago, use of a celebrity in advertising was pretty rare, and quite much the exception Until Kaun Banega Crorepati (KBC) happened almost 20 years ago, top Bollywood stars would keep their distance from television and advertising In the first decade of this century though use of famous faces both in advertising as well as in content creation increased considerably In the last 10 years, the use of celebrities in communication has increased exponentially Today almost 500 brands, , big and small, national and regional, use celebrities to endorse their offerings 0 2 WHAT THIS STUDY PROVIDES? Despite the exponential proliferation of celebrity usage in advertising and content, WHY there is no organised body of knowledge on these superstars that can help: BEST FIT APPROPRIATE OR BEST FIT SELECTION COMPETITIVE CHOOSE BETTER BETWEEN BEST FITS PERCEPTION CHOOSE BASIS BRAND ATTRIBUTES TRENDY LOOK AT EMERGING CHOICES FOR THE FUTURE 0 3 COVERAGE WHAT 23 CITIES METRO MINI METRO LARGE CITIES Delhi Ahmedabad Nagpur (incl.
    [Show full text]
  • Raja Ravi Varma 145
    viii PREFACE Preface i When Was Modernism ii PREFACE Preface iii When Was Modernism Essays on Contemporary Cultural Practice in India Geeta Kapur iv PREFACE Published by Tulika 35 A/1 (third floor), Shahpur Jat, New Delhi 110 049, India © Geeta Kapur First published in India (hardback) 2000 First reprint (paperback) 2001 Second reprint 2007 ISBN: 81-89487-24-8 Designed by Alpana Khare, typeset in Sabon and Univers Condensed at Tulika Print Communication Services, processed at Cirrus Repro, and printed at Pauls Press Preface v For Vivan vi PREFACE Preface vii Contents Preface ix Artists and ArtWork 1 Body as Gesture: Women Artists at Work 3 Elegy for an Unclaimed Beloved: Nasreen Mohamedi 1937–1990 61 Mid-Century Ironies: K.G. Subramanyan 87 Representational Dilemmas of a Nineteenth-Century Painter: Raja Ravi Varma 145 Film/Narratives 179 Articulating the Self in History: Ghatak’s Jukti Takko ar Gappo 181 Sovereign Subject: Ray’s Apu 201 Revelation and Doubt in Sant Tukaram and Devi 233 Frames of Reference 265 Detours from the Contemporary 267 National/Modern: Preliminaries 283 When Was Modernism in Indian Art? 297 New Internationalism 325 Globalization: Navigating the Void 339 Dismantled Norms: Apropos an Indian/Asian Avantgarde 365 List of Illustrations 415 Index 430 viii PREFACE Preface ix Preface The core of this book of essays was formed while I held a fellowship at the Nehru Memorial Museum and Library at Teen Murti, New Delhi. The project for the fellowship began with a set of essays on Indian cinema that marked a depar- ture in my own interpretative work on contemporary art.
    [Show full text]
  • PRESS RELEASE Homeward ARPITA SINGH 18 March
    D-40 Defence Colony, New Delhi 110024 | T +91-11-24622545/24615368 D-53 Defence Colony, New Delhi - 110024 | T +91-11-46103550/46103551 E [email protected] | W www.vadehraart.com PRESS RELEASE Homeward ARPITA SINGH 18 March – 16 April 2021 D-40 Defence Colony, New Delhi Vadehra Art Gallery is pleased to announce a continuation of our presentation titled Homeward, featuring a recent body of worK by Arpita Singh, which was recently presented as part of On Site, a collaborative exhibition by four leading galleries held at BiKaner House, New Delhi, earlier this month, and is now on view at our modern gallery. Described as a figurative artist and a modernist, Arpita Singh still maKes it a point to stay tuned in to traditional Indian art forms and aesthetics, like miniaturist painting and different forms of folk art, employing them regularly in her work. Afflicted by the problems that are faced each and every day by women in her country and the world in general, Singh paints the range of emotions that she exchanges with these subjects – from sorrow to joy and from suffering to hope – providing a view of the ongoing communication she maintains with them. In this latest body of watercolours on paper and oil paintings, Singh’s cartographical autobiographies assume new dimensions through an intensification of colour, accenting her imagined landscapes with the flourish of expressionist emotion. With compositions foregrounded in movement, Singh tends to emphasize the potential of individual agency operating within collective constraints, though her mapping doesn’t seem to prioritize any one aspect – whether the fictional, mythical, personal, public fact or dream.
    [Show full text]
  • Masculinity and the Structuring of the Public Domain in Kerala: a History of the Contemporary
    MASCULINITY AND THE STRUCTURING OF THE PUBLIC DOMAIN IN KERALA: A HISTORY OF THE CONTEMPORARY Ph. D. Thesis submitted to MANIPAL ACADEMY OF HIGHER EDUCATION (MAHE – Deemed University) RATHEESH RADHAKRISHNAN CENTRE FOR THE STUDY OF CULTURE AND SOCIETY (Affiliated to MAHE- Deemed University) BANGALORE- 560011 JULY 2006 To my parents KM Rajalakshmy and M Radhakrishnan For the spirit of reason and freedom I was introduced to… This work is dedicated…. The object was to learn to what extent the effort to think one’s own history can free thought from what it silently thinks, so enable it to think differently. Michel Foucault. 1985/1990. The Use of Pleasure: The History of Sexuality Vol. II, trans. Robert Hurley. New York: Vintage: 9. … in order to problematise our inherited categories and perspectives on gender meanings, might not men’s experiences of gender – in relation to themselves, their bodies, to socially constructed representations, and to others (men and women) – be a potentially subversive way to begin? […]. Of course the risks are very high, namely, of being misunderstood both by the common sense of the dominant order and by a politically correct feminism. But, then, welcome to the margins! Mary E. John. 2002. “Responses”. From the Margins (February 2002): 247. The peacock has his plumes The cock his comb The lion his mane And the man his moustache. Tell me O Evolution! Is masculinity Only clothes and ornaments That in time becomes the body? PN Gopikrishnan. 2003. “Parayu Parinaamame!” (Tell me O Evolution!). Reprinted in Madiyanmarude Manifesto (Manifesto of the Lazy, 2006). Thrissur: Current Books: 78.
    [Show full text]
  • Utopias and Dystopias in World Literature
    MEJO The MELOW Journal of World Literature Volume 4 February 2020 ISSN: 2581-5768 A peer-refereed journal published annually by MELOW (The Society for the Study of the Multi-Ethnic Literatures of the World) Sunny Pleasure Domes and Caves of Ice: Utopias and Dystopias in World Literature Editor Manpreet Kaur Kang Volume Sub-Editors Neela Sarkar Barnali Saha 1 Editor Manpreet Kaur Kang, Professor of English, Guru Gobind Singh IP University, Delhi Email: [email protected] Volume Sub-Editors Neela Sarkar, Associate Professor, New Alipore College, W.B. Email: [email protected] Barnali Saha, Research Scholar, Guru Gobind Singh IP University, Delhi Email: [email protected] Editorial Board: Anil Raina, Professor of English, Panjab University Email: [email protected] Debarati Bandyopadhyay, Professor of English, Visva-Bharati, Santiniketan Email: [email protected] Himadri Lahiri, Professor of English, University of Burdwan Email: [email protected] Manju Jaidka, Professor, Shoolini University, Solan Email: [email protected] Rimika Singhvi, Associate Professor, IIS University, Jaipur Email: [email protected] Roshan Lal Sharma, Professor, Central University of Himachal Pradesh, Dharamshala Email: [email protected] 2 3 EDITORIAL NOTE MEJO, or the MELOW Journal of World Literature, is a peer-refereed E-journal brought out biannually by MELOW, the Society for the Study of the Multi-Ethnic Literatures of the World. It is a reincarnation of the previous publications brought out in book or printed form by the Society right since its inception in 1998. MELOW is an academic organization, one of the foremost of its kind in India.
    [Show full text]
  • Postcolonial Pirate Domain." Postcolonial Piracy: Media Distribution and Cultural Production in the Global South
    Poduval, Satish. "Hacking and Difference: Reflections on Authorship in the Postcolonial Pirate Domain." Postcolonial Piracy: Media Distribution and Cultural Production in the Global South. Ed. Lars Eckstein and Anja Schwarz. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2014. 273–292. Bloomsbury Collections. Web. 2 Oct. 2021. <http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781472519450.ch-012>. Downloaded from Bloomsbury Collections, www.bloomsburycollections.com, 2 October 2021, 06:23 UTC. Copyright © Lars Eckstein and Anja Schwarz 2014. You may share this work for non-commercial purposes only, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher, and provide a link to the Creative Commons licence. 12 Hacking and Difference Reflections on Authorship in the Postcolonial Pirate Domain Satish Poduval Philip K. Dick famously observed about science fiction that ‘Jules Verne’s story of travel to the moon is not SF because they go by rocket but because of where they go. It would be as much SF if they went by rubber band’ (Dick 1995: 57). A remark like that is peculiarly resonant in postcolonial spaces where historical experience tends to be framed as a story of travel, as a destinal narrative1 in which modernity is simul- taneously a destination to be reached and the ensemble of mechanisms destined to accelerate the journey. However, in recent decades, the helical loop of this narrative appears to be unravelling. Neither the vision nor the vehicle of modernization is any longer monopolized by the state or the older national elites, and earlier conceptions of a shared Third World identity forged by imperial exploitation and industrial backwardness do not typify the global South uniformly today.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cinema of Satyajit Ray Between Tradition and Modernity
    The Cinema of Satyajit Ray Between Tradition and Modernity DARIUS COOPER San Diego Mesa College PUBLISHED BY THE PRESS SYNDICATE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge cb2 2ru, UK http://www.cup.cam.ac.uk 40 West 20th Street, New York, ny 10011-4211, USA http://www.cup.org 10 Stamford Road, Oakleigh, Melbourne 3166, Australia Ruiz de Alarcón 13, 28014 Madrid, Spain © Cambridge University Press 2000 This book is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written perrnission of Cambridge University Press. First published 2000 Printed in the United States of America Typeface Sabon 10/13 pt. System QuarkXpress® [mg] A catalog record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Cooper, Darius, 1949– The cinema of Satyajit Ray : between tradition and modernity / Darius Cooper p. cm. – (Cambridge studies in film) Filmography: p. Includes bibliographical references and index. isbn 0 521 62026 0 (hb). – isbn 0 521 62980 2 (pb) 1. Ray, Satyajit, 1921–1992 – Criticism and interpretation. I. Title. II. Series pn1998.3.r4c88 1999 791.43´0233´092 – dc21 99–24768 cip isbn 0 521 62026 0 hardback isbn 0 521 62980 2 paperback Contents List of Illustrations page ix Acknowledgments xi Introduction 1 1. Between Wonder, Intuition, and Suggestion: Rasa in Satyajit Ray’s The Apu Trilogy and Jalsaghar 15 Rasa Theory: An Overview 15 The Excellence Implicit in the Classical Aesthetic Form of Rasa: Three Principles 24 Rasa in Pather Panchali (1955) 26 Rasa in Aparajito (1956) 40 Rasa in Apur Sansar (1959) 50 Jalsaghar (1958): A Critical Evaluation Rendered through Rasa 64 Concluding Remarks 72 2.
    [Show full text]
  • National Law University, Delhi Sector-14, Dwarka New Delhi-110078
    NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY, DELHI SECTOR-14, DWARKA NEW DELHI-110078 ALL INDIA LAW ENTRANCE TEST-2016 (AILET-2016), B.A. LL.B.(HONS.) RESULT Marks Wise S.No. Roll No Name of the Candidate Name of Father/Mother/ Guardian DoB Gender Marks 1 52788 KARAN DHALLA DEEPESH DHALLA 03/02/1998 M 119 2 55979 SHUBHAM JAIN BHUPENDRA JAIN 20/11/1997 M 116 3 56876 VANSH AGGARWAL PAWAN SINGHAL 25/03/1998 M 116 4 63245 ARTH NAGPAL RAJESH NAGPAL 28/08/1997 M 114 5 64122 RIJU SHRIVASTAVA YUGENDRA ARYA 27/04/1998 F 114 6 69185 ROHIL BIPIN DESHPANDE BIPIN GAJANAN DESHPANDE 10/05/1998 M 114 7 70191 ARVIND KUMAR TIWARI AKHILESH CHANDRA TIWARI 03/10/1997 M 114 8 75260 ANUBHUTI GARG ARUN GARG 13/06/1997 F 114 9 63398 EKANSH ARORA RAJESH ARORA 08/01/1997 M 113 10 66089 KARISHMA KARTHIK KARTHIK SUBRAMANIAN 06/04/1998 F 113 11 75266 ANUNA TIWARI SANJAY TIWARI 14/08/1997 F 113 12 77055 ANMOL DHAWAN SANJEEV DHAWAN 29/12/1998 M 113 13 77061 ANUKRITI KUDESHIA ANURODH KUDESHIA 27/09/1997 F 113 14 64048 PRANSHU SHUKLA SANJAY SHUKLA 24/02/1998 M 112 15 71044 NIKHIL SHARMA PRAMOD KUMAR SHARMA 21/01/1997 M 112 16 75365 AVANI AGARWAL SURENDRA KUMAR AGARWAL 28/06/1998 F 112 17 63385 DIVYA KUMAR GARG NITIN GARG 05/04/1998 M 111 18 64071 PRIYANKA CHATURVEDI D. P. CHATURVEDI 20/02/1997 F 111 19 72316 PRITHVI JOSHI ARUN JOSHI 28/10/1998 M 111 20 74213 SHIVAM SINGHANIA SUNIL SINGHANIA 27/02/1998 M 111 21 74227 SHREYA JAIPURIA BIRENDRA JAIPURIA 22/12/1997 F 111 22 77417 SREEDEVI GOPALAKRISHNAN NAIR GOPALAKRISHNAN NAIR 01/07/1997 F 111 23 50911 ANKUR SINGHAL ANIL KUMAR SINGHAL 26/12/1997
    [Show full text]
  • Bollywood and Postmodernism Popular Indian Cinema in the 21St Century
    Bollywood and Postmodernism Popular Indian Cinema in the 21st Century Neelam Sidhar Wright For my parents, Kiran and Sharda In memory of Rameshwar Dutt Sidhar © Neelam Sidhar Wright, 2015 Edinburgh University Press Ltd The Tun – Holyrood Road 12 (2f) Jackson’s Entry Edinburgh EH8 8PJ www.euppublishing.com Typeset in 11/13 Monotype Ehrhardt by Servis Filmsetting Ltd, Stockport, Cheshire, and printed and bound in Great Britain by CPI Group (UK) Ltd, Croydon CR0 4YY A CIP record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 978 0 7486 9634 5 (hardback) ISBN 978 0 7486 9635 2 (webready PDF) ISBN 978 1 4744 0356 6 (epub) The right of Neelam Sidhar Wright to be identified as author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 and the Copyright and Related Rights Regulations 2003 (SI No. 2498). Contents Acknowledgements vi List of Figures vii List of Abbreviations of Film Titles viii 1 Introduction: The Bollywood Eclipse 1 2 Anti-Bollywood: Traditional Modes of Studying Indian Cinema 21 3 Pedagogic Practices and Newer Approaches to Contemporary Bollywood Cinema 46 4 Postmodernism and India 63 5 Postmodern Bollywood 79 6 Indian Cinema: A History of Repetition 128 7 Contemporary Bollywood Remakes 148 8 Conclusion: A Bollywood Renaissance? 190 Bibliography 201 List of Additional Reading 213 Appendix: Popular Indian Film Remakes 215 Filmography 220 Index 225 Acknowledgements I am grateful to the following people for all their support, guidance, feedback and encouragement throughout the course of researching and writing this book: Richard Murphy, Thomas Austin, Andy Medhurst, Sue Thornham, Shohini Chaudhuri, Margaret Reynolds, Steve Jones, Sharif Mowlabocus, the D.Phil.
    [Show full text]
  • Museum Bhavan Guide
    MUSEUM BHAVAN GUIDE “Museum Bhavan is a living exhibition that will wax and wane with the lunar cycle.” Dayanita Singh This is the premiere of MUSEUM BHAVAN on its home ground — at the Kiran Nadar Museum of Art, Delhi, it becomes a museum within a museum. MUSEUM BHAVAN is a collection of museums made by Dayanita Singh. They have previously been shown in London, Frankfurt and Chicago, and here, in Delhi, the artist has installed nine museums from the collection. Each holds old and new images, from the time Singh began photography in 1981 until the present. The architecture of the museums is integral to the realization of the images shown and stored in them. Each structure can be placed and opened out in different ways. It can hold around a hundred framed images, some on view, while others await their turn in the reserve collection kept inside the structure. All the museums have smaller structures within them, they can be displayed inside the museum or on the wall. The museums can form chambers for conversation and contemplation, with their own tables and stools, as in the Museum of Chance. They can also be joined to one another in different ways to form a labyrinth. The internal relationships among them have evolved through the endless process of editing, sequencing and archiving that sustains the formal thinking essential to the realization of Singh’s work. So, within the extended family of MUSEUM BHAVAN, it is now becoming clear that File Museum and Museum of Little Ladies are sibling museums, while Museum of Photography and Museum of Furniture are cousins.
    [Show full text]
  • 20Years of Sahmat.Pdf
    SAHMAT – 20 Years 1 SAHMAT 20 YEARS 1989-2009 A Document of Activities and Statements 2 PUBLICATIONS SAHMAT – 20 YEARS, 1989-2009 A Document of Activities and Statements © SAHMAT, 2009 ISBN: 978-81-86219-90-4 Rs. 250 Cover design: Ram Rahman Printed by: Creative Advertisers & Printers New Delhi Ph: 98110 04852 Safdar Hashmi Memorial Trust 29 Ferozeshah Road New Delhi 110 001 Tel: (011) 2307 0787, 2338 1276 E-mail: [email protected] www.sahmat.org SAHMAT – 20 Years 3 4 PUBLICATIONS SAHMAT – 20 Years 5 Safdar Hashmi 1954–1989 Twenty years ago, on 1 January 1989, Safdar Hashmi was fatally attacked in broad daylight while performing a street play in Sahibabad, a working-class area just outside Delhi. Political activist, actor, playwright and poet, Safdar had been deeply committed, like so many young men and women of his generation, to the anti-imperialist, secular and egalitarian values that were woven into the rich fabric of the nation’s liberation struggle. Safdar moved closer to the Left, eventually joining the CPI(M), to pursue his goal of being part of a social order worthy of a free people. Tragically, it would be of the manner of his death at the hands of a politically patronised mafia that would single him out. The spontaneous, nationwide wave of revulsion, grief and resistance aroused by his brutal murder transformed him into a powerful symbol of the very values that had been sought to be crushed by his death. Such a death belongs to the revolutionary martyr. 6 PUBLICATIONS Safdar was thirty-four years old when he died.
    [Show full text]
  • Dayanita Singh Biography
    ALMA ZEVI DAYANITA SINGH Born in 1961 in New Delhi, India. She lives and works in New Delhi, India. Education 1988 Photojournalism and Documentary Photography, International Center of Photography, New York City, USA 1986 Visual Communication, National Institute of Design, Ahmedabad, India Selected Solo Exhibitions 2019 Dayanita Singh and Box 507 Pop Up, Frith Street Gallery, London, UK 2018 Pop-Up Book Shop, Callicoon Fine Arts, New York City, USA 2017 Museum Bhavan, Tokyo Photographic Art Museum, Tokyo, Japan 2016 Suitcase Museum, Dr. Bhau Daji Lad Museum, Mumbai, India Museum of Shedding, Frith Street Gallery, London, UK Museum of Machines: Photographs, Projections, Volumes, MAST, Bologna, Italy Museum of Chance – Book Object, Hawa Mahal, Jaipur, India 2015 Conversation Chambers Museum Bhavan, Kiran Nadar Museum of Art, Delhi, India Book Works, Goethe-Institut. New Delhi, India Museum of Chance – A book story, MMB, Delhi, India 2014 Museum of Chance – A book story, MMB, Mumbai, India Go Away Closer, MMK, Frankfurt, Germany City Dwellers: Contemporary Art From India, Seattle Art Museum, Seattle, USA Art Institute Chicago, Chicago, USA 2013 Go Away Closer, Hayward Gallery, Southbank Centre, London, UK 2012 File Museum, Frith Street Gallery, London, UK Dayanita Singh / The Adventures of a Photographer, Bildmuseet, Umeå University, Umea, Sweden Monuments of Knowledge, Photographs by Dayanita Singh, Kings College London, London, UK House of Love, Nature Morte, New Delhi, India 2011 Adventures of a Photographer, Shiseido Gallery, Tokyo, Japan
    [Show full text]